Pub Date : 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01225-z
Anita Hardon, Martha M Téllez-Rojo, Michael Anastario, Michael Lim Tan, Cecilia S Alcala, Precious A Echague, Amy Kuritzky, Talia R Gordon, Zoe Boudart, Mariana Rios Sandoval, Elizabeth F S Roberts
{"title":"Anthroposomics: integrating anthropological methods into exposome research.","authors":"Anita Hardon, Martha M Téllez-Rojo, Michael Anastario, Michael Lim Tan, Cecilia S Alcala, Precious A Echague, Amy Kuritzky, Talia R Gordon, Zoe Boudart, Mariana Rios Sandoval, Elizabeth F S Roberts","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01225-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01225-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522934/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145291488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01210-6
Kinga Polańska, Agnieszka Jankowska, Daniel Bury, Rebecca K Moos, Claudia Pälmke, Joanna Jerzyńska, Joanna Jurewicz, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly, Holger M Koch, Mercè Garí
Background: Exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers as well as bisphenols may be relevant to the development of behavioural symptoms in childhood with sex-specific effects, although the results of existing studies are not consistent. The aim of the study was to evaluate the cross-sectional association between childhood exposure to these compounds and behavioral outcomes in the REPRO_PL cohort (Poland).
Methods: Behavioral assessments were performed at the age of 7-9 years by parents using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). HPLC-MS/MS was used for the quantification of BPA and 21 phthalate metabolites corresponding to 11 phthalate compounds (n = 400) and their replacement alternatives BPF, BPS, three metabolites of diethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHTP) and three metabolites of di-isononyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) (n = 150). Multivariable linear regression models accounting for sex-specific effects as well as sex-adjusted models were applied, using both separate models for each metabolite (or sum of metabolites) and joint models. In addition, mixtures models adjusted by the three chemical groups studied were also performed.
Results: Median concentrations of several phthalate metabolites and bisphenols were of 42 µg/L (MEP), 4.5 µg/L (MMP), 3.5 µg/L (ΣDiDP), 2 µg/L (BPA) and 1 µg/L (BPF). For ΣDEHTP and ΣDINCH, the median concentrations were 35 µg/L and 3.1 µg/L, respectively. Exposure to phthalates was related to behavioral problems in girls, and bisphenols and DEHTP in boys. Among girls, DiBP was associated with mental health problems (total difficulties: β = 4.84; 95% CI 0.72;8.96, emotional: β = 2.14; 95% CI 0.33;4.0, hyperactivity/inattention: β = 2.52; 95% CI 0.55;4.49, externalizing behavior: (β = 2.95; 95% CI 0.36;5.53) and DiDP with hyperactivity/inattention scores (β = 2.46; 95% CI 0.30;4.63). BPF was associated with emotional problems and internalizing behavior among boys in both main and sensitivity models (main model: β = 1.03; 95% CI -0.16;2.21 and β = 1.71; 95% CI -0.14;3.56 respectively).
Conclusions: This study shows that children's exposure to several replacement compounds of BPA and phthalates, such as BPF and DEHTP, are associated with adverse effects on school-age children's behavior, with a divergent sex-specific effect. In any case, mixture models did not provide any further insight on the aforementioned cross-sectional associations and further methodological approaches are needed to explore adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children and teenagers.
背景:接触邻苯二甲酸酯和非邻苯二甲酸酯增塑剂以及双酚类物质可能与儿童期具有性别特异性影响的行为症状的发展有关,尽管现有研究的结果并不一致。该研究的目的是评估在波兰的rep_pl队列中儿童暴露于这些化合物和行为结果之间的横断面关联。方法:对7 ~ 9岁儿童进行行为评估,由家长采用《优势与困难问卷》(SDQ)进行评估。采用HPLC-MS/MS法测定了11种邻苯二甲酸酯化合物(n = 400)及其替代品BPF、BPS、3种对苯二甲酸二乙基己酯(DEHTP)代谢物和3种二异丙基环己烷-1,2-二羧酸酯(DINCH)代谢物(n = 150)的双酚a和21种邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物。应用了考虑性别特异性效应的多变量线性回归模型以及性别调整模型,使用每种代谢物(或代谢物总和)的单独模型和联合模型。此外,还进行了三种化学基团调整后的混合模型。结果:几种邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物和双酚类物质的中位浓度分别为42µg/L (MEP)、4.5µg/L (MMP)、3.5µg/L (ΣDiDP)、2µg/L (BPA)和1µg/L (BPF)。对于ΣDEHTP和ΣDINCH,中位浓度分别为35µg/L和3.1µg/L。暴露于邻苯二甲酸盐与女孩的行为问题有关,暴露于双酚和DEHTP与男孩的行为问题有关。在女孩中,DiBP与心理健康问题相关(总困难:β = 4.84; 95% CI 0.72;8.96;情绪:β = 2.14; 95% CI 0.33;4.0;多动/注意力不集中:β = 2.52; 95% CI 0.55;4.49;外化行为:(β = 2.95; 95% CI 0.36;5.53); DiDP与多动/注意力不集中得分相关(β = 2.46; 95% CI 0.30;4.63)。在主模型和敏感模型中,BPF与男孩的情绪问题和内化行为相关(主模型:β = 1.03; 95% CI -0.16;2.21和β = 1.71; 95% CI -0.14;3.56)。结论:本研究表明,儿童暴露于双酚a和邻苯二甲酸盐的几种替代化合物,如BPF和DEHTP,对学龄儿童的行为有不利影响,但有不同的性别特异性影响。无论如何,混合模型并没有提供任何关于上述横截面关联的进一步见解,需要进一步的方法学方法来探索儿童和青少年的不良神经发育结果。
{"title":"Impact of plastic-related chemicals on emotional and behavioral health in children from Poland.","authors":"Kinga Polańska, Agnieszka Jankowska, Daniel Bury, Rebecca K Moos, Claudia Pälmke, Joanna Jerzyńska, Joanna Jurewicz, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly, Holger M Koch, Mercè Garí","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01210-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01210-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers as well as bisphenols may be relevant to the development of behavioural symptoms in childhood with sex-specific effects, although the results of existing studies are not consistent. The aim of the study was to evaluate the cross-sectional association between childhood exposure to these compounds and behavioral outcomes in the REPRO_PL cohort (Poland).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Behavioral assessments were performed at the age of 7-9 years by parents using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). HPLC-MS/MS was used for the quantification of BPA and 21 phthalate metabolites corresponding to 11 phthalate compounds (n = 400) and their replacement alternatives BPF, BPS, three metabolites of diethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHTP) and three metabolites of di-isononyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) (n = 150). Multivariable linear regression models accounting for sex-specific effects as well as sex-adjusted models were applied, using both separate models for each metabolite (or sum of metabolites) and joint models. In addition, mixtures models adjusted by the three chemical groups studied were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median concentrations of several phthalate metabolites and bisphenols were of 42 µg/L (MEP), 4.5 µg/L (MMP), 3.5 µg/L (ΣDiDP), 2 µg/L (BPA) and 1 µg/L (BPF). For ΣDEHTP and ΣDINCH, the median concentrations were 35 µg/L and 3.1 µg/L, respectively. Exposure to phthalates was related to behavioral problems in girls, and bisphenols and DEHTP in boys. Among girls, DiBP was associated with mental health problems (total difficulties: β = 4.84; 95% CI 0.72;8.96, emotional: β = 2.14; 95% CI 0.33;4.0, hyperactivity/inattention: β = 2.52; 95% CI 0.55;4.49, externalizing behavior: (β = 2.95; 95% CI 0.36;5.53) and DiDP with hyperactivity/inattention scores (β = 2.46; 95% CI 0.30;4.63). BPF was associated with emotional problems and internalizing behavior among boys in both main and sensitivity models (main model: β = 1.03; 95% CI -0.16;2.21 and β = 1.71; 95% CI -0.14;3.56 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that children's exposure to several replacement compounds of BPA and phthalates, such as BPF and DEHTP, are associated with adverse effects on school-age children's behavior, with a divergent sex-specific effect. In any case, mixture models did not provide any further insight on the aforementioned cross-sectional associations and further methodological approaches are needed to explore adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children and teenagers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145291494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-10DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01234-y
Haili Ren, Yizhang Xia, Tianchi Zhuang, Yang Li, Yu Chen, Wei Huang, Peijie Jiang, Xia Tang, Shuwen Han, Yan Cui, Jiemiao Shen, Minghui Ji
Objectives: In the context of global warming and escalating urbanization, occurrences of extreme ozone (EO) and heatwave (HW) events are increasingly frequent. However, studies on the impact of consecutive extreme ozone and heatwave (EO-HW) events on hospitalizations for neurological disorders (ND) and related economic burdens remains limited. Our study aimed to explore the impacts of these events on ND hospitalizations, length of stay, and related costs, with a specific focus on quantifying the impacts of consecutive extreme events of varying durations.
Methods: Time-series analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between consecutive O3 and HW events of varying durations and the number of hospitalizations, length of stay, and hospitalization costs for ND, employing a quasi-Poisson distributed‑lag non‑linear model (DLNM). In addition, we further identified potential high-risk groups by age and gender stratification.
Results: Exposure to EO-HW events were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for ND, with this risk persisting from lag 1 day (1.097, 95% CI: 1.005,1.198) to lag 4 days (1.071, 95% CI: 1.004,1.139). Significant associations were particularly evident in male (highest RR value 1.092, 95% CI: 1.016,1.173) and aged < 65 years (highest RR value 1.124, 95% CI: 1.008,1.254). Furthermore, exposure to EO-HW events were found to result in longer length of stay and higher hospitalization costs compared to exposure to HW events alone.
Conclusions: Consecutive EO-HW events significantly increase the risk of hospitalization and the economic burden of ND. Local authorities should consider incorporating early warning information and public health interventions for consecutive extreme weather into existing early warning systems. Neglecting to do so will likely result in higher associated illness rates and economic burdens.
{"title":"Exposure to consecutive extreme ozone-heatwave events and neurological disorders: a retrospective cohort study in Nanjing, China.","authors":"Haili Ren, Yizhang Xia, Tianchi Zhuang, Yang Li, Yu Chen, Wei Huang, Peijie Jiang, Xia Tang, Shuwen Han, Yan Cui, Jiemiao Shen, Minghui Ji","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01234-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01234-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the context of global warming and escalating urbanization, occurrences of extreme ozone (EO) and heatwave (HW) events are increasingly frequent. However, studies on the impact of consecutive extreme ozone and heatwave (EO-HW) events on hospitalizations for neurological disorders (ND) and related economic burdens remains limited. Our study aimed to explore the impacts of these events on ND hospitalizations, length of stay, and related costs, with a specific focus on quantifying the impacts of consecutive extreme events of varying durations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Time-series analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between consecutive O<sub>3</sub> and HW events of varying durations and the number of hospitalizations, length of stay, and hospitalization costs for ND, employing a quasi-Poisson distributed‑lag non‑linear model (DLNM). In addition, we further identified potential high-risk groups by age and gender stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to EO-HW events were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for ND, with this risk persisting from lag 1 day (1.097, 95% CI: 1.005,1.198) to lag 4 days (1.071, 95% CI: 1.004,1.139). Significant associations were particularly evident in male (highest RR value 1.092, 95% CI: 1.016,1.173) and aged < 65 years (highest RR value 1.124, 95% CI: 1.008,1.254). Furthermore, exposure to EO-HW events were found to result in longer length of stay and higher hospitalization costs compared to exposure to HW events alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consecutive EO-HW events significantly increase the risk of hospitalization and the economic burden of ND. Local authorities should consider incorporating early warning information and public health interventions for consecutive extreme weather into existing early warning systems. Neglecting to do so will likely result in higher associated illness rates and economic burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512602/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145274222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01226-y
Riccardo Mazzoli, Tommaso Filippini, Inga Iamandii, Lisa De Pasquale, Federica Veneri, Linda S Birnbaum, Kenneth J Rothman, Marco Vinceti
{"title":"The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis.","authors":"Riccardo Mazzoli, Tommaso Filippini, Inga Iamandii, Lisa De Pasquale, Federica Veneri, Linda S Birnbaum, Kenneth J Rothman, Marco Vinceti","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01226-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01226-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512478/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145257646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01222-2
Dawud Abduweli Uyghurturk, Dana E Goin, Esperanza Angeles Martinez-Mier, Tracey J Woodruff, Pamela K DenBesten
{"title":"Correction: Maternal and fetal exposures to fluoride during mid-gestation among pregnant women in northern California.","authors":"Dawud Abduweli Uyghurturk, Dana E Goin, Esperanza Angeles Martinez-Mier, Tracey J Woodruff, Pamela K DenBesten","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01222-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01222-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509339/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145257668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-07DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01183-6
David M Haas, Kevin Moss, Hani Faysal, Lynn M Yee, Robert M Silver, William A Grobman
Background: Environmental exposures, such as pesticides, during pregnancy have been associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage and shorter gestational length at birth. However, their relationship with gestational diabetes (GDM) is uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze first-trimester urinary herbicide concentrations for their associations with GDM.
Methods: This was a nested case-control study analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study- Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) study. The study included participants at the three midwestern study sites. We analyzed individuals according to whether they developed GDM. Urinary herbicide concentration at the upper quartile was the exposure of interest. To assess the association of first-trimester urine glyphosate and metabolites with GDM, conditional logistic regression was used for matched pairs models. To test whether the association of herbicides with GDM was modified by BMI, an interaction term of herbicide (dichotomous variable) * BMI was included.
Results: The 118 cases of nuMoM2b participants with GDM were matched with 118 randomly selected age-matched controls who had no adverse pregnancy outcomes. Participants with GDM were less likely to be Non-Hispanic White (26.3% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.02), had a higher mean BMI (30.7 ± 8.3 vs. 26.1 ± 6.3; p < 0.01), and were less likely to have graduated from college (55.1% vs. 72.0%; p = 0.007). Glyphosate concentrations were above the limit of detection (LOD) in 93.6% of analyzable samples. In the adjusted conditional logistic regression for the matched pairs model, participants with glyphosate in the upper quartile had significantly higher odds of having GDM (odds ratio [OR] 3.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-10.3), with the OR of 1.23 (95% CI 1.02-1.47) for the interaction with BMI. Compared to participants with BMI < 25 kg/m2, the adjusted odds of GDM for participants with obese BMI (≥ 30 kg/m2) was elevated (OR 8.52, 95% CI 1.27-57.2).
Conclusion: First trimester urinary glyphosate concentrations were associated with development of GDM, and the magnitude of this association increased at higher BMI.
Trial registry: NCT01322529.
背景:怀孕期间的环境暴露,如农药,与几种不良妊娠结局有关,包括流产和出生时妊娠长度缩短。然而,它们与妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的关系尚不确定。本研究的目的是分析孕早期尿中除草剂浓度与GDM的关系。方法:这是一项对未产妊娠结局研究-监测准妈妈(nuMoM2b)研究的巢式病例对照研究分析。这项研究包括了中西部三个研究地点的参与者。我们根据个体是否患上GDM进行分析。尿液除草剂浓度在上四分位数是感兴趣的暴露。为了评估妊娠早期尿草甘膦和代谢物与GDM的关系,对配对模型使用条件逻辑回归。为了检验除草剂与GDM的关联是否被BMI修饰,我们引入除草剂(二分类变量)* BMI的相互作用项。结果:118例患有GDM的nuMoM2b参与者与118例随机选择的年龄匹配的无不良妊娠结局的对照组相匹配。患有GDM的受试者不太可能是非西班牙裔白人(26.3% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.02),平均BMI较高(30.7±8.3 vs. 26.1±6.3;p 2,肥胖BMI(≥30 kg/m2)的受试者发生GDM的调整几率升高(OR 8.52, 95% CI 1.27-57.2)。结论:妊娠早期尿草甘膦浓度与GDM的发生相关,且BMI越高,这种相关性越强。试验注册表:NCT01322529。
{"title":"First trimester urine glyphosate concentrations and gestational diabetes in nulliparas: a nested case-control study.","authors":"David M Haas, Kevin Moss, Hani Faysal, Lynn M Yee, Robert M Silver, William A Grobman","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01183-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01183-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Environmental exposures, such as pesticides, during pregnancy have been associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage and shorter gestational length at birth. However, their relationship with gestational diabetes (GDM) is uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze first-trimester urinary herbicide concentrations for their associations with GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nested case-control study analysis of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study- Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) study. The study included participants at the three midwestern study sites. We analyzed individuals according to whether they developed GDM. Urinary herbicide concentration at the upper quartile was the exposure of interest. To assess the association of first-trimester urine glyphosate and metabolites with GDM, conditional logistic regression was used for matched pairs models. To test whether the association of herbicides with GDM was modified by BMI, an interaction term of herbicide (dichotomous variable) * BMI was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 118 cases of nuMoM2b participants with GDM were matched with 118 randomly selected age-matched controls who had no adverse pregnancy outcomes. Participants with GDM were less likely to be Non-Hispanic White (26.3% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.02), had a higher mean BMI (30.7 ± 8.3 vs. 26.1 ± 6.3; p < 0.01), and were less likely to have graduated from college (55.1% vs. 72.0%; p = 0.007). Glyphosate concentrations were above the limit of detection (LOD) in 93.6% of analyzable samples. In the adjusted conditional logistic regression for the matched pairs model, participants with glyphosate in the upper quartile had significantly higher odds of having GDM (odds ratio [OR] 3.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-10.3), with the OR of 1.23 (95% CI 1.02-1.47) for the interaction with BMI. Compared to participants with BMI < 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, the adjusted odds of GDM for participants with obese BMI (≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) was elevated (OR 8.52, 95% CI 1.27-57.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First trimester urinary glyphosate concentrations were associated with development of GDM, and the magnitude of this association increased at higher BMI.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>NCT01322529.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505753/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01231-1
Barrak Alahmad, William Kessler, Yazan Alwadi, Joel Schwartz, Gregory R Wagner, David Michaels
Background: Exposure to heat leads to physiological and cognitive impairments that increase the risk of workplace injuries. This study estimates the number and proportion of work injuries reported to the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that can be attributed to heat exposure. These estimates contribute to the calculation of the benefits of standards, policies, and programs that reduce workplace exposure to extreme heat.
Methods: We analyzed all 2023 injury cases reported to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application by establishments with 100 or more employees, primarily in high-hazard industries. Each injury was geocoded and matched with high-resolution weather data for the specific injury date. Using a case-crossover design, we compared heat index on each injury day (case) with matched non-injury control days for the same worker. Conditional logistic regression was applied separately for summer-only and year-round periods with a non-linear term for heat index to estimate the odds ratios for injury occurrence. We additionally examined heat-injury patterns by industry sectors and in states with/without workplace heat standards.
Results: The odds of work injury increased non-linearly with a rising heat index: the pooled national estimate showed a clear upward trend starting around 85°F and accelerating above 90°F. Our results were consistent across nearly all industry sectors, including those that are predominantly indoors. Using a heat index of 80°F as reference, odds ratios (OR) of injuries at or above 90°F, 100°F and 110°F were 1.03 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.02, 1.04), 1.10 (1.07, 1.13), and 1.20 (1.13, 1.26), respectively. At a heat index of 110°F or higher, the odds increased by 22% in states without occupational heat rules (OR=1.22; 1.15,1.29) versus 9% in states with rules (OR=1.09; 0.84, 1.41), suggesting a protective effect, although confidence intervals overlapped. Overall, we estimate 1.18% (95% empirical CI: 0.92%, 1.45%) of all injuries were attributable to heat exposure on days exceeding a heat index of 70°F.
Conclusion: Heat exposure increases the overall risk of work injury, an effect consistent across nearly all major industries.
{"title":"A nationwide analysis of heat and workplace injuries in the United States.","authors":"Barrak Alahmad, William Kessler, Yazan Alwadi, Joel Schwartz, Gregory R Wagner, David Michaels","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01231-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01231-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to heat leads to physiological and cognitive impairments that increase the risk of workplace injuries. This study estimates the number and proportion of work injuries reported to the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that can be attributed to heat exposure. These estimates contribute to the calculation of the benefits of standards, policies, and programs that reduce workplace exposure to extreme heat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed all 2023 injury cases reported to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application by establishments with 100 or more employees, primarily in high-hazard industries. Each injury was geocoded and matched with high-resolution weather data for the specific injury date. Using a case-crossover design, we compared heat index on each injury day (case) with matched non-injury control days for the same worker. Conditional logistic regression was applied separately for summer-only and year-round periods with a non-linear term for heat index to estimate the odds ratios for injury occurrence. We additionally examined heat-injury patterns by industry sectors and in states with/without workplace heat standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The odds of work injury increased non-linearly with a rising heat index: the pooled national estimate showed a clear upward trend starting around 85°F and accelerating above 90°F. Our results were consistent across nearly all industry sectors, including those that are predominantly indoors. Using a heat index of 80°F as reference, odds ratios (OR) of injuries at or above 90°F, 100°F and 110°F were 1.03 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.02, 1.04), 1.10 (1.07, 1.13), and 1.20 (1.13, 1.26), respectively. At a heat index of 110°F or higher, the odds increased by 22% in states without occupational heat rules (OR=1.22; 1.15,1.29) versus 9% in states with rules (OR=1.09; 0.84, 1.41), suggesting a protective effect, although confidence intervals overlapped. Overall, we estimate 1.18% (95% empirical CI: 0.92%, 1.45%) of all injuries were attributable to heat exposure on days exceeding a heat index of 70°F.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heat exposure increases the overall risk of work injury, an effect consistent across nearly all major industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498468/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-02DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01220-4
Ronald L Melnick, Joel M Moskowitz, Paul Héroux, Erica Mallery-Blythe, Julie E McCredden, Martha Herbert, Lennart Hardell, Alasdair Philips, Fiorella Belpoggi, John W Frank, Theodora Scarato, Elizabeth Kelley
The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned 12 systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) on health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). The health outcomes selected for those reviews (cancer, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, cognitive impairment, birth outcomes, male fertility, oxidative stress, and heat-related effects) were based on a WHO-conducted international survey. The SR of the studies of cancer in laboratory animal studies was the only one that did not include a MA, because those authors considered it inappropriate due to methodological differences among the available studies, including differences in exposure characteristics (carrier frequency, modulation, polarization), experimental parameters (hours/day of exposure, duration of exposure, exposure systems), and different biological models. MAs in all the other SRs suffered from relatively few primary studies available for each MA (sometimes due to excessive subgrouping), exclusion of relevant studies, weaknesses in many of the included primary studies, lack of a framework for analyzing complex processes such as those involved in cognitive functions, and/or high between-study heterogeneity. Due to serious methodological flaws and weaknesses in the conduct of the reviews and MAs on health effects of RF-EMF exposure, the WHO-commissioned SRs cannot be used as proof of safety of cell phones and other wireless communication devices. However, the animal cancer SR, which was rated as "high certainty of evidence" for heart schwannomas and "moderate certainty of evidence" for brain gliomas, provided quantitative information that could be used to set exposure limits based on reducing cancer risk. The multiple and significant dose-related adverse effects found in the SRs on male fertility and pregnancy and birth outcome should also serve as the basis for policy decisions to lower exposure limits and reduce human reproductive risks. The report of harmful effects (e.g., cancer, reproductive toxicity, etc.) at doses below the adverse health effect threshold claimed by ICNIRP demonstrates that current exposure limits to RF-EMF, which were established by applying arbitrary uncertainty factors to their putative adverse threshold dose, lack scientific credibility.
{"title":"The WHO-commissioned systematic reviews on health effects of radiofrequency radiation provide no assurance of safety.","authors":"Ronald L Melnick, Joel M Moskowitz, Paul Héroux, Erica Mallery-Blythe, Julie E McCredden, Martha Herbert, Lennart Hardell, Alasdair Philips, Fiorella Belpoggi, John W Frank, Theodora Scarato, Elizabeth Kelley","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01220-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01220-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned 12 systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) on health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). The health outcomes selected for those reviews (cancer, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, cognitive impairment, birth outcomes, male fertility, oxidative stress, and heat-related effects) were based on a WHO-conducted international survey. The SR of the studies of cancer in laboratory animal studies was the only one that did not include a MA, because those authors considered it inappropriate due to methodological differences among the available studies, including differences in exposure characteristics (carrier frequency, modulation, polarization), experimental parameters (hours/day of exposure, duration of exposure, exposure systems), and different biological models. MAs in all the other SRs suffered from relatively few primary studies available for each MA (sometimes due to excessive subgrouping), exclusion of relevant studies, weaknesses in many of the included primary studies, lack of a framework for analyzing complex processes such as those involved in cognitive functions, and/or high between-study heterogeneity. Due to serious methodological flaws and weaknesses in the conduct of the reviews and MAs on health effects of RF-EMF exposure, the WHO-commissioned SRs cannot be used as proof of safety of cell phones and other wireless communication devices. However, the animal cancer SR, which was rated as \"high certainty of evidence\" for heart schwannomas and \"moderate certainty of evidence\" for brain gliomas, provided quantitative information that could be used to set exposure limits based on reducing cancer risk. The multiple and significant dose-related adverse effects found in the SRs on male fertility and pregnancy and birth outcome should also serve as the basis for policy decisions to lower exposure limits and reduce human reproductive risks. The report of harmful effects (e.g., cancer, reproductive toxicity, etc.) at doses below the adverse health effect threshold claimed by ICNIRP demonstrates that current exposure limits to RF-EMF, which were established by applying arbitrary uncertainty factors to their putative adverse threshold dose, lack scientific credibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490090/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145206017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01228-w
Leonid Kopylev, Deborah Segal
Background: Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is a well-established hazard of methylmercury (MeHg) exposure. Past research on MeHg has highlighted DNT tests of language/verbal function (in particular the Boston naming test (BNT)) as an important aspect of MeHg toxicity.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis based on a recent systematic review of MeHg neurodevelopmental dose-response cohort studies published 1998-2025 that reported similarly normed tests of language/verbal function. Meta-analyses were based on recent studies using maternal blood biomarkers or cord blood biomarkers converted into maternal blood biomarkers.
Results: For the BNT with or without cues, analysis (based on 2 studies (3 populations)) results were adverse, but not statistically significant. For the similarly normed language/verbal tests, decrements were statistically significant [-0.0085 95% (-0.0167; -0.0003) per MeHg µg/L maternal blood (based on eight studies)]. Results of a fill and trim sensitivity analysis were similar in the size of the effect to the original results. The two studies with sex-specific results indicated that boys appeared to be more sensitive to MeHg-related language/verbal function decrements when compared with girls.
Conclusions: Although most of the individual study results of language/verbal function were not statistically significant, the meta-estimate showed a statistically significant decrement in language/verbal function in children due to prenatal MeHg exposure.
{"title":"Relationship of prenatal methylmercury exposure and language/verbal function: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Leonid Kopylev, Deborah Segal","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01228-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01228-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is a well-established hazard of methylmercury (MeHg) exposure. Past research on MeHg has highlighted DNT tests of language/verbal function (in particular the Boston naming test (BNT)) as an important aspect of MeHg toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis based on a recent systematic review of MeHg neurodevelopmental dose-response cohort studies published 1998-2025 that reported similarly normed tests of language/verbal function. Meta-analyses were based on recent studies using maternal blood biomarkers or cord blood biomarkers converted into maternal blood biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the BNT with or without cues, analysis (based on 2 studies (3 populations)) results were adverse, but not statistically significant. For the similarly normed language/verbal tests, decrements were statistically significant [-0.0085 95% (-0.0167; -0.0003) per MeHg µg/L maternal blood (based on eight studies)]. Results of a fill and trim sensitivity analysis were similar in the size of the effect to the original results. The two studies with sex-specific results indicated that boys appeared to be more sensitive to MeHg-related language/verbal function decrements when compared with girls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although most of the individual study results of language/verbal function were not statistically significant, the meta-estimate showed a statistically significant decrement in language/verbal function in children due to prenatal MeHg exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145191374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1186/s12940-025-01154-x
Christopher Neurath
Background: Extensive academic research has documented the tobacco industry's manipulation of science. Recently, scholars have begun examining the sugar industry's use of similar tactics to downplay sugar's role in obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and tooth decay. Archival records show sugar-industry-funded scientists criticized evidence linking sugar to these harms and deflected attention to other risk factors. Sugar's connection to tooth decay has been the most difficult harm for the industry to deny. Evidence is emerging that the industry turned to promoting fluoride as the solution to tooth decay thereby averting calls for reducing sugar consumption. Newly accessible sugar and dental industry documents enable investigation into whether fluoride research was manipulated to deflect from sugar's role in tooth decay, and later to defend fluoride when evidence of fluoride's own harmful effects arose.
Method: Internal documents from sugar and dental organizations were examined and compared to the published scientific record. The Industries Documents collection at the University of California San Francisco was the main source of records. Analysis was in the context of the current understanding of how vested interests manipulate science to defend their products.
Results: Records dating back to the 1930s demonstrate the sugar industry, sometimes in cooperation with dental interests, exaggerated fluoride's effectiveness and downplayed safety concerns. The sugar industry's science manipulation campaign preceded the better-known tobacco industry campaign defending cigarettes. Key leaders of the sugar industry's campaign transferred to the tobacco industry, which then adopted many of the sugar industry's tactics and financed research from some of the same sugar-conflicted scientists. Currently, a prominent safety issue with fluoride is developmental neurotoxicity. Evidence indicates that researchers with undisclosed conflicts of interest with sugar and allied industries produced biased reviews downplaying this risk.
Conclusion: Recently available records reveal a long history of the sugar industry distorting fluoride science. Many of the sugar industry's tactics were later adopted by the tobacco industry and mirrored by industries involved in asbestos, lead, pesticides, climate change denial, and others. Researchers and policymakers should be aware of the distorted scientific record regarding fluoride effectiveness and toxicity.
{"title":"The sugar industry's efforts to manipulate research on fluoride effectiveness and toxicity: a ninety-year history.","authors":"Christopher Neurath","doi":"10.1186/s12940-025-01154-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12940-025-01154-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extensive academic research has documented the tobacco industry's manipulation of science. Recently, scholars have begun examining the sugar industry's use of similar tactics to downplay sugar's role in obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and tooth decay. Archival records show sugar-industry-funded scientists criticized evidence linking sugar to these harms and deflected attention to other risk factors. Sugar's connection to tooth decay has been the most difficult harm for the industry to deny. Evidence is emerging that the industry turned to promoting fluoride as the solution to tooth decay thereby averting calls for reducing sugar consumption. Newly accessible sugar and dental industry documents enable investigation into whether fluoride research was manipulated to deflect from sugar's role in tooth decay, and later to defend fluoride when evidence of fluoride's own harmful effects arose.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Internal documents from sugar and dental organizations were examined and compared to the published scientific record. The Industries Documents collection at the University of California San Francisco was the main source of records. Analysis was in the context of the current understanding of how vested interests manipulate science to defend their products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records dating back to the 1930s demonstrate the sugar industry, sometimes in cooperation with dental interests, exaggerated fluoride's effectiveness and downplayed safety concerns. The sugar industry's science manipulation campaign preceded the better-known tobacco industry campaign defending cigarettes. Key leaders of the sugar industry's campaign transferred to the tobacco industry, which then adopted many of the sugar industry's tactics and financed research from some of the same sugar-conflicted scientists. Currently, a prominent safety issue with fluoride is developmental neurotoxicity. Evidence indicates that researchers with undisclosed conflicts of interest with sugar and allied industries produced biased reviews downplaying this risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recently available records reveal a long history of the sugar industry distorting fluoride science. Many of the sugar industry's tactics were later adopted by the tobacco industry and mirrored by industries involved in asbestos, lead, pesticides, climate change denial, and others. Researchers and policymakers should be aware of the distorted scientific record regarding fluoride effectiveness and toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11686,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145184977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}