Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1002/em.22646
J Christopher Corton, Scott S Auerbach, Naoki Koyama, Roman Mezencev, Carole L Yauk, Takayoshi Suzuki
There is growing recognition across broad sectors of the toxicology community that gene expression biomarkers have the potential to identify genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens through a weight-of-evidence approach, providing opportunities to reduce reliance on the 2-year bioassay to identify carcinogens. In August 2022, a workshop within the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) was held to critically review current methods to identify genotoxicants using various 'omics profiling methods. Here, we describe the findings of a workshop subgroup focused on the state of the science regarding the use of biomarkers to identify chemicals that act as genotoxicants in vivo. A total of 1341 papers were screened to identify those that were most relevant. While six published biomarkers with characterized accuracy were initially examined, four of the six were not considered further, because they had not been tested for classification accuracy using additional sets of chemicals or other transcript profiling platforms. Two independently derived biomarkers used in conjunction with standard computational techniques can identify genotoxic chemicals in vivo (rat liver or both rat and mouse liver) on different gene expression profiling platforms. The biomarkers have predictive accuracies of ≥92%. These biomarkers have the potential to be used in conjunction with other biomarkers in integrated test strategies using short-term rodent exposures to identify genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemicals that cause cancer.
{"title":"Review and meta-analysis of gene expression biomarkers predictive of chemical-induced genotoxicity in vivo.","authors":"J Christopher Corton, Scott S Auerbach, Naoki Koyama, Roman Mezencev, Carole L Yauk, Takayoshi Suzuki","doi":"10.1002/em.22646","DOIUrl":"10.1002/em.22646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing recognition across broad sectors of the toxicology community that gene expression biomarkers have the potential to identify genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens through a weight-of-evidence approach, providing opportunities to reduce reliance on the 2-year bioassay to identify carcinogens. In August 2022, a workshop within the International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) was held to critically review current methods to identify genotoxicants using various 'omics profiling methods. Here, we describe the findings of a workshop subgroup focused on the state of the science regarding the use of biomarkers to identify chemicals that act as genotoxicants in vivo. A total of 1341 papers were screened to identify those that were most relevant. While six published biomarkers with characterized accuracy were initially examined, four of the six were not considered further, because they had not been tested for classification accuracy using additional sets of chemicals or other transcript profiling platforms. Two independently derived biomarkers used in conjunction with standard computational techniques can identify genotoxic chemicals in vivo (rat liver or both rat and mouse liver) on different gene expression profiling platforms. The biomarkers have predictive accuracies of ≥92%. These biomarkers have the potential to be used in conjunction with other biomarkers in integrated test strategies using short-term rodent exposures to identify genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemicals that cause cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":"58-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143002242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2023-12-15DOI: 10.1002/em.22578
Carol Beevers, Yoshifumi Uno, Krista Meurer, Shuichi Hamada, Kiyohiro Hashimoto, David Kirkland, Matthew J LeBaron, Frank Le Curieux, Ludovic Le Hegarat, Hans-Joerg Martus, Kenichi Masumura, Wakako Ohyama, Daniel J Roberts, Marie Vasquez, James Whitwell, Kristine L Witt
The in vivo working group (WG) considered three topics: acceptable maximum doses for negative erythrocyte micronucleus (MN) tests, validation status of MN assays in non-hematopoietic tissues, and nuisance factors in the comet assay. The WG reached agreement on many issues, including: negative erythrocyte MN studies should be acceptable if dosing is conducted to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 474 recommendations and if sufficient bone marrow exposure is demonstrated; consensus on the evidence required to demonstrate "sufficient" exposure was not reached. The liver MN test using six-week-old rats is sufficiently validated to develop an OECD TG, but the impact of animal age warrants additional study. Ki-67 is a reliable marker for cellular proliferation in hepatocytes. The gastrointestinal tract MN test is useful for detecting poorly absorbed or rapidly degraded aneugens, and for genotoxic metabolites formed in the colon. Although current validation data are insufficient to support the development of an OECD TG, the methodologies are sufficient to consider as an appendix to OECD TG474. Comparison of comet assay results to laboratory historical control data (HCD) should not be used in data evaluation, unless the HCD distribution is demonstrated to be stable and the predominant source of HCD variation is due to animal, not study, factors. No universally acceptable negative control limit for any tissue was identified. Methodological differences in comet studies can result in variable data interpretations; more data are required before best practice recommendations can be made. Hedgehogs alone are unreliable indicators of cytotoxicity and additional investigations into cytotoxicity markers are required.
{"title":"In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: Report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT).","authors":"Carol Beevers, Yoshifumi Uno, Krista Meurer, Shuichi Hamada, Kiyohiro Hashimoto, David Kirkland, Matthew J LeBaron, Frank Le Curieux, Ludovic Le Hegarat, Hans-Joerg Martus, Kenichi Masumura, Wakako Ohyama, Daniel J Roberts, Marie Vasquez, James Whitwell, Kristine L Witt","doi":"10.1002/em.22578","DOIUrl":"10.1002/em.22578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The in vivo working group (WG) considered three topics: acceptable maximum doses for negative erythrocyte micronucleus (MN) tests, validation status of MN assays in non-hematopoietic tissues, and nuisance factors in the comet assay. The WG reached agreement on many issues, including: negative erythrocyte MN studies should be acceptable if dosing is conducted to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 474 recommendations and if sufficient bone marrow exposure is demonstrated; consensus on the evidence required to demonstrate \"sufficient\" exposure was not reached. The liver MN test using six-week-old rats is sufficiently validated to develop an OECD TG, but the impact of animal age warrants additional study. Ki-67 is a reliable marker for cellular proliferation in hepatocytes. The gastrointestinal tract MN test is useful for detecting poorly absorbed or rapidly degraded aneugens, and for genotoxic metabolites formed in the colon. Although current validation data are insufficient to support the development of an OECD TG, the methodologies are sufficient to consider as an appendix to OECD TG474. Comparison of comet assay results to laboratory historical control data (HCD) should not be used in data evaluation, unless the HCD distribution is demonstrated to be stable and the predominant source of HCD variation is due to animal, not study, factors. No universally acceptable negative control limit for any tissue was identified. Methodological differences in comet studies can result in variable data interpretations; more data are required before best practice recommendations can be made. Hedgehogs alone are unreliable indicators of cytotoxicity and additional investigations into cytotoxicity markers are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":"81-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71520850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leslie Recio, Carol Swartz, Lincoln Martin, Emily Rottinger, Stefan Pfuhler, Erica Pinkus, Daniel J. Roberts, Leon F. Stankowski, Simran Kaushal, Norah A. Owiti, Bevin P. Engelward
This interlaboratory evaluation of HepaRG CometChip was conducted to assess transferability and reproducibility of this new approach methodology (NAM) across four laboratories. Concentrations inducing up to ~70% relative cytotoxicity were determined by the organizing laboratory, and frozen chemical formulation blocks were sent to each participant. When noncytotoxic, 10 mM was the maximum dose. Cultures were exposed once daily for three consecutive days, and both cytotoxicity assessment, via ATP quantification, and comet analysis, commenced 3–4 h after initiation of the final exposure. Positive response was statistical pairwise significance (p < 0.05) with concentration-related increases in %Tail DNA across ≥ 2 consecutive exposures. For 8 of 11 compounds, all four labs generated unanimous test results, with four negative compounds (2-acetylaminofluorene [2-AAF], 2,4-dichlorophenol, eugenol and hydroquinone) and four positive compounds (azidothymidine, benzo(a)pyrene [BP], cyclophosphamide [CP], ethyl methanesulfonate).For the remaining chemicals, three of four labs generated negative calls for amitrole, cadmium chloride, and DMBA. In cases where bulky lesions were anticipated, the magnitude of %Tail DNA was low, due to the inherent insensitivity of the alkaline comet assay (not the CometChip per se) to detect bulky adducts repaired by nucleotide excision repair. This is supported by the small magnitude in %Tail DNA induced by BP and CP. Taken together, for all compounds there was majority agreement in CometChip results across participating laboratories supporting that the endpoint is readily transferable to new labs. Overall, this platform is a promising human-relevant NAM, with a physiologically relevant detoxification process that could be incorporated into rodent replacement strategies.
{"title":"Transferability and Reproducibility of the HepaRG CometChip Assay","authors":"Leslie Recio, Carol Swartz, Lincoln Martin, Emily Rottinger, Stefan Pfuhler, Erica Pinkus, Daniel J. Roberts, Leon F. Stankowski, Simran Kaushal, Norah A. Owiti, Bevin P. Engelward","doi":"10.1002/em.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1002/em.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This interlaboratory evaluation of HepaRG CometChip was conducted to assess transferability and reproducibility of this new approach methodology (NAM) across four laboratories. Concentrations inducing up to ~70% relative cytotoxicity were determined by the organizing laboratory, and frozen chemical formulation blocks were sent to each participant. When noncytotoxic, 10 mM was the maximum dose. Cultures were exposed once daily for three consecutive days, and both cytotoxicity assessment, via ATP quantification, and comet analysis, commenced 3–4 h after initiation of the final exposure. Positive response was statistical pairwise significance (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with concentration-related increases in %Tail DNA across ≥ 2 consecutive exposures. For 8 of 11 compounds, all four labs generated unanimous test results, with four negative compounds (2-acetylaminofluorene [2-AAF], 2,4-dichlorophenol, eugenol and hydroquinone) and four positive compounds (azidothymidine, benzo(a)pyrene [BP], cyclophosphamide [CP], ethyl methanesulfonate).For the remaining chemicals, three of four labs generated negative calls for amitrole, cadmium chloride, and DMBA. In cases where bulky lesions were anticipated, the magnitude of %Tail DNA was low, due to the inherent insensitivity of the alkaline comet assay (not the CometChip per se) to detect bulky adducts repaired by nucleotide excision repair. This is supported by the small magnitude in %Tail DNA induced by BP and CP. Taken together, for all compounds there was majority agreement in CometChip results across participating laboratories supporting that the endpoint is readily transferable to new labs. Overall, this platform is a promising human-relevant NAM, with a physiologically relevant detoxification process that could be incorporated into rodent replacement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"66 9","pages":"478-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}