European Journal of Haematology最新文献

Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a challenging condition despite advances in immunotherapies. Novel bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), including talquetamab, have shown promising efficacy in heavily pretreated patients, even those with triple- and penta-refractory disease. Talquetamab, recently approved by the FDA and EMA, is indicated for patients who have progressed after at least three or four prior lines of therapy (LOTs). Administered following a step-up dosing phase to manage cytokine release syndrome (CRS), talquetamab demonstrated a high overall response rate (ORR) of approximately 70%, including in patients previously treated with T-cell redirecting therapies. Its safety profile is consistent with other BsAbs, with hematologic adverse events such as anemia and neutropenia commonly reported, alongside unique on-target off-tumor toxicities like dysgeusia and skin-related events. Infections were less frequent compared to other BsAbs. The optimal sequencing of talquetamab and other therapies, including CAR-T cell treatments, remains an area of active research, as resistance to anti-BCMA therapies presents ongoing clinical challenges. Current trials are exploring the use of talquetamab in combination therapies, as well as therapeutic strategies post-treating progression. The real-world data further support talquetamab's efficacy, making it a valuable addition to the RRMM treatment landscape.

Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) exhibits striking clinical and biological heterogeneity. Recent studies have identified new subgroups within germinal center B-cell like (GCB) DLBCL, associated with inferior prognosis, irrespective of MYC and BCL2 translocations. We explored the existence of such a DLBCL high-risk subgroup, based on multilevel aberrations, especially focusing on MYC and BCL2.

Methods: Tissue samples from 111 DLBCL patients were sequenced with a 90-gene lymphoma panel, followed by integrative analyses combining sequencing data, immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and clinical data.

Results: We identified a high-risk subgroup in DLBCL defined by: dual immunohistochemical MYC and BCL2 expression (DEL), concurrent MYC and BCL2 translocations (DHL-BCL2), mutations in MYC, CXCR4, or both, and/or BCL2 amplification. The high-risk subgroup constituted 41% of the cohort and included DHL-BCL2, DEL, a GCB subgroup likely representing the recently described GCB subgroups, and a subset of non-GCB patients. In multivariate analysis, high-risk features provided independent predictive value from age and IPI. The 5-year overall survival was 36% in high-risk patients, compared to 76% in non-high-risk patients.

Conclusion: We identified a distinct high-risk DLBCL subgroup, characterized by MYC and BCL2 aberrations, beyond conventional DHL-BCL2 and DEL, and irrespective of cell-of-origin, thereby expanding the poor-prognosis group.

Objectives: Health information for 17 109 people living with hemophilia A (PLwHA) is contained within the ATHNdataset. We aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of damoctocog alfa pegol (BAY 94-9027, Jivi®) for hemophilia A.

Methods: The ATHNdataset was queried for PLwHA receiving damoctocog alfa pegol between January 1, 2010 and April 30, 2022. Data captured via patient charts were analyzed.

Results: At data cutoff, 205 PLwHA were treated with damoctocog alfa pegol: 150 (73.2%) severe (1 female [0.5%]) and 55 (26.8%) mild/moderate (3 [1.5%] female). In total, 32/205 (25.9%) PLwHA received on-demand treatment; 172 (83.9%) received prophylaxis-161 (93.6%) continuous prophylaxis. Documented bleed rates were available for 187 (91.2%) PLwHA, including those on prophylaxis and on-demand regimens, with 150 (80.2%) treated for > 12 months. Overall annualized bleeding rates and proportion of PLwHA with zero bleeds, receiving prophylaxis during the observation period, were mean (SD) 0.26 (1.03) and 138/157 (87.9%), respectively. No new or recurring inhibitors were reported.

Conclusion: A low number of bleeds were observed with damoctocog alfa pegol in the real world in both male and female PLwHA. Data should be interpreted with caution owing to limitations of real-world studies and insubstantial data for female PLwHA.

Objectives: Evidence-based protocols for managing bleeding emergencies in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are lacking. We conducted a systematic review of treatments for critical bleeding in patients with ITP.

Methods: We included all study designs and extracted data in aggregate or individually for patients who received one or more interventions and for whom any of the following outcomes were reported: platelet count response, bleeding, disability, or death.

Results: We identified 49 eligible studies reporting 112 critical bleed patients with ITP, including 66 children (median age, 10 years), 36 adults (median age, 41.5 years), and 10 patients with unreported age. Patients received corticosteroids (n = 67), IVIG (n = 49), platelet transfusions (n = 41), TPO-RAs (n = 17), and splenectomy (n = 28) either alone or in combination. Studies reported 29 different treatment combinations, the 5 most common were corticosteroids, platelet transfusion and splenectomy (n = 13), corticosteroids and IVIG (n = 13), or splenectomy alone (n = 13); IVIG alone (n = 11); and corticosteroids, IVIG and TPO-RA (n = 8). Mortality among patients with critical bleeds in ITP was 30.6% for adults and 19.7% for children.

Conclusions: The effects of individual treatments on patient outcomes were uncertain due to very low-quality evidence. There is a need for a standardized approach to the treatment of ITP critical bleeds.

Systematic review registration: CRD42020161206.

Introduction: Teclistamab has demonstrated deep responses in patients with multiple myeloma in the MajesTEC-1 study. However, the safety and efficacy of teclistamab in patients with AL amyloidosis are unknown.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with biopsy-proven relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis who were treated with teclistamab from December 2022 to February 2024 at the University of Pennsylvania. The data cutoff was 2/29/24. Adverse events (AE) were extracted from the electronic medical record. Patients were assessed for hematologic and organ response per consensus guidelines.

Results: Eight patients were included in this case series: median age 63 (range 59-67), 75% female, 88% White. All eight patients achieved at least very good partial response (VGPR) and had normalization of free light chains (FLC), and six (75%) patients achieved undetectable FLC levels. Of the six patients with immunofixation completed, all six (100%) achieved hematologic complete response (hCR). The median time to hematologic VGPR and hCR was 13 days (range 12-18 days) and 88 days (range 32-150 days), respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 8.5 months (range 1-14 months). Of the five patients with cardiac involvement, four (80%) achieved a cardiac response. Of the seven patients with renal involvement, two patients already achieved renal response prior to teclistamab, and of the remaining five, three (60%) achieved renal response. Six patients (75%) developed low-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS). No patients developed ICANS. Neutropenia and AKI both occurred in 25% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions: In this series of patients, teclistamab showed outstanding depth of response and was well-tolerated. Teclistamab shows promise in treating patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis.

Objective: This non-interventional, prospective, single-center study aimed to develop a technique to measure ruxolitinib (RUX) concentrations and provide preliminary data on the distribution of plasma drug levels in patients with steroid refractory (SR) GvHD.

Methods: Between April 2023 and May 2024, we analyzed 48 blood samples from 29 patients with SR-GvHD.

Results: Median individual plasma concentrations varied across different RUX doses and largely overlapped: 39.2 ng/mL at 10 mg b.i.d (range: 0-73), 13.1 ng/mL at 10-5 mg (range, 6.1-35.6), and 31.6 ng/mL at 5 mg b.i.d (range: 0.7-99.9). Samples taken under non-optimal temperature conditions showed a lower median concentration of 0.77 ng/mL (range: 0-7.4 ng/mL). The four patients who did not respond at days +28 and +180 after RUX initiation (3 with lower gastrointestinal aGvHD, and 1 with ocular, hepatic, and pulmonary cGvHD) showed a median concentration of only (7.4 ng/mL (range, 0-29) ng/mL) with full dosing.

Conclusions: The introduction and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying plasma RUX concentrations was feasible in our center. Administering predetermined and fixed doses of RUX in patients with SR-GvHD showed highly variable and overlapping plasma drug concentrations. This underscores the potential importance of RUX- pharmacokinetics (PK) monitoring.

No existing studies compare oral anticoagulants to treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis (HIT/HITT). This retrospective study evaluated thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in adults treated for HIT/HITT with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or warfarin between 2012 and 2023 within the Ochsner Health System. Patients with mechanical heart valves, valvular atrial fibrillation, antiphospholipid syndrome, active malignancy, or venous thromboembolism (VTE) within the previous 6 months were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of new or progressive VTE or arterial thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, duration of hospitalization, time to platelet recovery, and incidence of skin necrosis, gangrene, and amputation. Forty-nine patients receiving a DOAC and 30 patients receiving warfarin were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts. There were non-statistically significant increased rates of both the primary outcome (8.9% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.65) and the composite bleeding outcome (32.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.37) in the DOAC cohort. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A growing list of therapies available for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) results in deep response rates, but eventually almost all patients relapse. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a familiar approach for MM, but responses are often short and side effects burdensome. Simultaneously, allo-SCT provides a unique platform on which novel immune therapies can be employed to improve clinical outcomes. Our work describes the characteristics and outcomes of 128 refractory myeloma patients who underwent allo-SCT at five German centers between 2010 and 2021. The median number of therapies before the transplant was 6. With a median follow-up of 6, 4 years, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7 and 19 months, respectively. NRM was 28% after 6 years. OS and PFS were 61% and 45% at 1 year, 49% and 34% at 2 years, and 38% and 25% at 6 years. Achieving a CR before transplant was the single most significant variable before transplant. Allo-SCT yet remains an option for fit patient's refractory to all other treatments available. It is potentially curative for a subset of patients. Finding the characteristics of patients with durable remissions is key to sparing unnecessary toxicity for those unlikely to benefit.

The cover image is based on the Article Plasma monomeric ApoA1 and high-density lipoprotein bound ApoA1 are markedly decreased and associated with low levels of lipophilic antioxidants in sickle cell disease: A potential new pathway for therapy by Eric J. Niesor et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14288

The treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (RR-FL) is marked by a pivotal debate between chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). While both CAR-T therapy and BsAbs target similar immunobiology and molecular markers, their efficacy comparisons are hindered by the lack of direct clinical trial comparisons. Key trials, such as the ZUMA-5 study, underscore axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel)'s efficacy in treating RR-FL, achieving a 79% complete response rate with a median duration of response exceeding 3 years. Similarly, lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in the TRANSCEND FL study reports a 94% complete response rate, emphasizing robust outcomes in heavily pretreated patients. Among BsAbs, mosunetuzumab showed promise in the GO29781 trial, with a 62% overall response rate in heavily pretreated RR-FL patients. Thus, CAR-T therapy offers potential curative benefits with a single infusion. However, its efficacy is tempered by significant adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, and cytopenias, requiring specialized management and patient monitoring. In contrast, BsAbs provide a more tolerable treatment option counterbalancing by lower response rates and frequent dosing requirements. Personalized treatment strategies are crucial because of these distinct efficacy and safety profiles. When considering cost-effectiveness, both therapies need to be evaluated in the context of their clinical outcomes and quality of life improvements. Cost-effectiveness considerations are essential; while CAR-T therapies incur higher initial costs, their potential for long-term remission may mitigate expenses associated with repeated treatments or hospitalizations. Future research into resistance mechanisms and optimal therapeutic sequencing will further refine RR-FL management strategies.