Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae027
Edoardo Sciatti, A. Calabrese, V. Duino, Salvatore D'isa, Luca Antonio Felice Di Odoardo, E. D’Elia, Michele Senni
Moderate aortic stenosis is associated with a worse prognosis than milder degrees. Pathophysiologically, this condition in a dysfunctional ventricle could lead to a further mechanism of haemodynamic worsening, so its treatment should lead to clinical advantages for the patient. The low risk of complications associated with percutaneous correction of aortic valve disease (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) should also be considered, which would seem to favour an interventional approach even in the aforementioned condition. However, sparse data and small population studies make this approach still controversial. Three randomized controlled trials are underway to shed definitive light on the topic.
{"title":"Moderate aortic stenosis in the dysfunctional ventricle: should it be treated?","authors":"Edoardo Sciatti, A. Calabrese, V. Duino, Salvatore D'isa, Luca Antonio Felice Di Odoardo, E. D’Elia, Michele Senni","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae027","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Moderate aortic stenosis is associated with a worse prognosis than milder degrees. Pathophysiologically, this condition in a dysfunctional ventricle could lead to a further mechanism of haemodynamic worsening, so its treatment should lead to clinical advantages for the patient. The low risk of complications associated with percutaneous correction of aortic valve disease (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) should also be considered, which would seem to favour an interventional approach even in the aforementioned condition. However, sparse data and small population studies make this approach still controversial. Three randomized controlled trials are underway to shed definitive light on the topic.","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140757980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae011
P. Temporelli
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently represents the majority of all heart failure cases in the community. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists represent a class of medications used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus and, in some cases, obesity. This class includes semaglutide. In the available data from the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) trials that were done, looking at weight loss effects of semaglutide, there was a 30–40% reduction in C-reactive protein levels, and that suggests that there is a significant anti-inflammatory effect. Recently, the STEP-HFpEF trial enrolled 529 non-diabetic patients with HFpEF and obesity who were randomly assigned to once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. A statistically significant improvement in the quality of life score and in weight loss was observed. Statistically significant improvements were also seen in the 6 min walk distance, levels of C-reactive protein, and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Interestingly, the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity trial has shown that semaglutide produced a consistent reduction of around 20% vs. placebo across major cardiovascular event endpoints over the ∼3-year follow-up in patients with overweight or obesity and cardiovascular disease but not diabetes.
{"title":"Role of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists in obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction","authors":"P. Temporelli","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) currently represents the majority of all heart failure cases in the community. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists represent a class of medications used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus and, in some cases, obesity. This class includes semaglutide. In the available data from the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) trials that were done, looking at weight loss effects of semaglutide, there was a 30–40% reduction in C-reactive protein levels, and that suggests that there is a significant anti-inflammatory effect. Recently, the STEP-HFpEF trial enrolled 529 non-diabetic patients with HFpEF and obesity who were randomly assigned to once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. A statistically significant improvement in the quality of life score and in weight loss was observed. Statistically significant improvements were also seen in the 6 min walk distance, levels of C-reactive protein, and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Interestingly, the Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity trial has shown that semaglutide produced a consistent reduction of around 20% vs. placebo across major cardiovascular event endpoints over the ∼3-year follow-up in patients with overweight or obesity and cardiovascular disease but not diabetes.","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140773835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae004
F. Biccirè, L. Gatto, Francesco Prati
Despite notable advances in devices and techniques, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still affected by a substantial number of complications and failure rates. Over the years, the use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) has dramatically improved the understanding of mechanical and technical factors related to successful and failed PCI, becoming a mainstay in complex trans-catheter interventions. However, ICI modalities are invasive, time-consuming, and costly, and a net clinical benefit needs to be shown in order to recommend their routine use in clinical practice. In the past, the lack of evidence from randomized trials has been reflected in the scepticism shown by international guidelines. The recent publication of large randomized clinical trials conducted worldwide has provided new evidence regarding the clinical usefulness of ICI guidance in PCI. The consistent reduction of adverse events achieved in these trials, also demonstrated in an updated meta-analysis, suggested that the use of ICI in PCI is compelling to achieve optimal technical results and better outcomes, especially in complex high-risk interventions. Also considering the burden of information provided by ICI on coronary artery disease, looking from the inside seems today an opportunity that modern cardiology cannot ignore anymore.
{"title":"Intracoronary imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: from evidence to guidelines","authors":"F. Biccirè, L. Gatto, Francesco Prati","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Despite notable advances in devices and techniques, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still affected by a substantial number of complications and failure rates. Over the years, the use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) has dramatically improved the understanding of mechanical and technical factors related to successful and failed PCI, becoming a mainstay in complex trans-catheter interventions. However, ICI modalities are invasive, time-consuming, and costly, and a net clinical benefit needs to be shown in order to recommend their routine use in clinical practice. In the past, the lack of evidence from randomized trials has been reflected in the scepticism shown by international guidelines. The recent publication of large randomized clinical trials conducted worldwide has provided new evidence regarding the clinical usefulness of ICI guidance in PCI. The consistent reduction of adverse events achieved in these trials, also demonstrated in an updated meta-analysis, suggested that the use of ICI in PCI is compelling to achieve optimal technical results and better outcomes, especially in complex high-risk interventions. Also considering the burden of information provided by ICI on coronary artery disease, looking from the inside seems today an opportunity that modern cardiology cannot ignore anymore.","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140785502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae008
G. Tavecchia, Elena Gualini, A. Sacco, Fabrizio Oliva
There is an unmet need for new treatment options for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as progress in patients’ outcomes has plateaued over the past 15 years. Sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated cardio-renal benefits in various disease states, encompassing diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. Experimental studies further support their use in AMI, demonstrating beneficial effects in animal models by reducing infarct size and mitigating adverse cardiac remodelling. Recently, two clinical trials have been published thus paving the way for a new field to explore. This paper briefly outlines the available evidence and future perspectives regarding the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in this clinical scenario.
{"title":"The role of sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in myocardial infarction: available evidence and future perspectives","authors":"G. Tavecchia, Elena Gualini, A. Sacco, Fabrizio Oliva","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae008","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 There is an unmet need for new treatment options for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as progress in patients’ outcomes has plateaued over the past 15 years. Sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated cardio-renal benefits in various disease states, encompassing diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. Experimental studies further support their use in AMI, demonstrating beneficial effects in animal models by reducing infarct size and mitigating adverse cardiac remodelling. Recently, two clinical trials have been published thus paving the way for a new field to explore. This paper briefly outlines the available evidence and future perspectives regarding the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in this clinical scenario.","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140770492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae006
L. Calò, M. Tatangelo, G. Panattoni, C. Crescenzi, Marianna Squeglia, Francesca Fanisio, F. Romeo, Federica Toto, E. De Ruvo, M. Rebecchi
The identification of ventricular premature complexes during a cardiological evaluation necessitates the implementation of diagnostic processes aimed at discerning the clinical context that may predispose individuals to a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Epidemiological studies reveal that ventricular premature beats occur in approximately 75% of healthy (or seemingly healthy) individuals, as long as there is no evidence of underlying structural heart disease, such as benign idiopathic ventricular extrasystole originating from the right and left ventricular outflow tracts. In the real world, however, ventricular ectopic beats with morphologies very similar to seemingly benign occurrences are not uncommon. They are notable in subjects exhibiting rapid and complex repetitive forms during exercise testing and Holter electrocardiogram. Additionally, these subjects may display more or less extensive scarring signs on cardiac magnetic resonance and may have a family history of cardiomyopathy and/or sudden cardiac death. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to critically analyse the process of evaluating premature ventricular complexes, which is crucial for accurate risk stratification. The latter cannot overlook some inevitable elements, including morphology, origin, complexity, and the associated clinical setting (absence or presence of structural heart disease).
{"title":"Unlocking the enigma: decoding premature ventricular complexes for effective clinical assessment and risk management","authors":"L. Calò, M. Tatangelo, G. Panattoni, C. Crescenzi, Marianna Squeglia, Francesca Fanisio, F. Romeo, Federica Toto, E. De Ruvo, M. Rebecchi","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The identification of ventricular premature complexes during a cardiological evaluation necessitates the implementation of diagnostic processes aimed at discerning the clinical context that may predispose individuals to a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Epidemiological studies reveal that ventricular premature beats occur in approximately 75% of healthy (or seemingly healthy) individuals, as long as there is no evidence of underlying structural heart disease, such as benign idiopathic ventricular extrasystole originating from the right and left ventricular outflow tracts. In the real world, however, ventricular ectopic beats with morphologies very similar to seemingly benign occurrences are not uncommon. They are notable in subjects exhibiting rapid and complex repetitive forms during exercise testing and Holter electrocardiogram. Additionally, these subjects may display more or less extensive scarring signs on cardiac magnetic resonance and may have a family history of cardiomyopathy and/or sudden cardiac death. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to critically analyse the process of evaluating premature ventricular complexes, which is crucial for accurate risk stratification. The latter cannot overlook some inevitable elements, including morphology, origin, complexity, and the associated clinical setting (absence or presence of structural heart disease).","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140771697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae003
Antonio L. Bartorelli, L. Grancini, G. Monizzi, Emanuele Gallinoro, A. Mastrangelo, Vincenzo Mallia, Franco Fabbiocchi, D. Andreini
The COAPT 5-year data demonstrate that compared with medical treatment transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with the MitraClip in symptomatic patients with Grade 3+/Grade 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) reduced by nearly half the annualized hospitalization risk (33 vs. 57%), by almost 30% the death rate (57 vs. 67%) and achieved significant and durable SMR reduction in 95% of patients. Control patients who crossed over to TEER at 2 years had better prognosis, but nearly half of them died before reaching crossover eligibility. Death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) occurred in 73.6% of TEER patients and 91.5% of controls within 5 years, pointing to a need for further study to address left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, the underlying cause of patient’s disease. MTRA-FR targeted SMR using the same device and did not improve the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HHF at 12 months. Possible reasons for the discrepancy include enrolment of patients with more severe MR and less-advanced LV disease (dilation/dysfunction), less-procedural complications, and higher success in reducing MR in COAPT compared with MITRA-FR. Thus, the ideal patient for MitraClip treatment would be one with severe MR, but with no too severe LV dilation/dysfunction, which is what differentiates COAPT patients from those in MITRA-FR.
{"title":"I prefer the MitraClip in these cases: the 5-year COAPT data","authors":"Antonio L. Bartorelli, L. Grancini, G. Monizzi, Emanuele Gallinoro, A. Mastrangelo, Vincenzo Mallia, Franco Fabbiocchi, D. Andreini","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae003","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The COAPT 5-year data demonstrate that compared with medical treatment transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with the MitraClip in symptomatic patients with Grade 3+/Grade 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) reduced by nearly half the annualized hospitalization risk (33 vs. 57%), by almost 30% the death rate (57 vs. 67%) and achieved significant and durable SMR reduction in 95% of patients. Control patients who crossed over to TEER at 2 years had better prognosis, but nearly half of them died before reaching crossover eligibility. Death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) occurred in 73.6% of TEER patients and 91.5% of controls within 5 years, pointing to a need for further study to address left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, the underlying cause of patient’s disease. MTRA-FR targeted SMR using the same device and did not improve the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HHF at 12 months. Possible reasons for the discrepancy include enrolment of patients with more severe MR and less-advanced LV disease (dilation/dysfunction), less-procedural complications, and higher success in reducing MR in COAPT compared with MITRA-FR. Thus, the ideal patient for MitraClip treatment would be one with severe MR, but with no too severe LV dilation/dysfunction, which is what differentiates COAPT patients from those in MITRA-FR.","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140766917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-19DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae001
{"title":"Correction to: Burden of bradycardia and barriers to accessing bradycardia therapy in underserved countries","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139525074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-13eCollection Date: 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad131
Alexander M Bernhardt, Evgenij Potapov, Christophe Vandenbriele, Carsten Skurk, Letizia F Bertoldi, Federico Pappalardo
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by a state of inadequate systemic tissue perfusion caused by cardiac dysfunction. When to implement, change, or remove the use of a temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients with CS is dependent on the aetiology and severity. Here, patient scenarios underlying the need to escalate, de-escalate, wean, or bridge from tMCS devices are taken into consideration by interdisciplinary heart failure and CS teams. This includes a comprehensive review of and focus on the rationale for specific device escalation and de-escalation strategies, device selection, and general management.
{"title":"Differential utilization of Impella devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and combined therapies as escalation and de-escalation strategies.","authors":"Alexander M Bernhardt, Evgenij Potapov, Christophe Vandenbriele, Carsten Skurk, Letizia F Bertoldi, Federico Pappalardo","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by a state of inadequate systemic tissue perfusion caused by cardiac dysfunction. When to implement, change, or remove the use of a temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients with CS is dependent on the aetiology and severity. Here, patient scenarios underlying the need to escalate, de-escalate, wean, or bridge from tMCS devices are taken into consideration by interdisciplinary heart failure and CS teams. This includes a comprehensive review of and focus on the rationale for specific device escalation and de-escalation strategies, device selection, and general management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715938/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138799225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-13eCollection Date: 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad128
Letizia F Bertoldi, Andrea Montisci, Dirk Westermann, Mario Iannaccone, Vasileios Panoulas, Nikos Werner, Norman Mangner
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical syndrome with a high risk of mortality. The recent, rapid development of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has altered CS treatment. While catecholamines remain the cornerstone of CS therapy, tMCS usage has increased. According to shock severity, different treatment strategies including catecholamines alone, catecholamines and tMCS, or multiple tMCS might be used. State-of-the-art implantation techniques are necessary to avoid complications linked to the invasive nature of tMCS. In particular, bleeding and access-site complications might counteract the potential haemodynamic benefit of a percutaneous ventricular assist device. In this review, we describe the role of catecholamines in CS treatment and present the different tMCS devices with an explanation on how to use them according to CS aetiology and severity. Finally, an overview of the best practice for device implantation is provided.
{"title":"From medical therapy to mechanical support: strategies for device selection and implantation techniques.","authors":"Letizia F Bertoldi, Andrea Montisci, Dirk Westermann, Mario Iannaccone, Vasileios Panoulas, Nikos Werner, Norman Mangner","doi":"10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical syndrome with a high risk of mortality. The recent, rapid development of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has altered CS treatment. While catecholamines remain the cornerstone of CS therapy, tMCS usage has increased. According to shock severity, different treatment strategies including catecholamines alone, catecholamines and tMCS, or multiple tMCS might be used. State-of-the-art implantation techniques are necessary to avoid complications linked to the invasive nature of tMCS. In particular, bleeding and access-site complications might counteract the potential haemodynamic benefit of a percutaneous ventricular assist device. In this review, we describe the role of catecholamines in CS treatment and present the different tMCS devices with an explanation on how to use them according to CS aetiology and severity. Finally, an overview of the best practice for device implantation is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":11956,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715943/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138799241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：