European Journal of Pain最新文献_第7页

The effect of stretching intensity on pain sensitivity: A randomized crossover study on healthy adults 拉伸强度对疼痛敏感性的影响：一项针对健康成年人的随机交叉研究。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4750

Morten Pallisgaard Støve, Line Ørum Hansen, Kristian Kloppenborg Elmbæk, Stig Peter Magnusson, Janus Laust Thomsen, Allan Riis

Background

Stretching exercises have effects on local and widespread pain sensitivity. A dose–response relationship may exist between the analgesic effect and the intensity of stretching, such that a higher intensity of stretching may generate a larger reduction in analgesic response, but this remains to be studied. This study aimed to examine the dose–response relationship between stretching intensity and the analgesic effect.

Methods

A randomized, repeated-measures crossover study was performed to examine the effect of stretching to the first point of pain onset and stretching to the point of a sensation of stretching (discomfort). The primary outcome was regional and distant pressure pain thresholds.

Results

Thirty-one participants (n = 24 female) were available for analysis. We observed a 22.2% increase in regional pressure pain thresholds (93.2 kPa, p = 0.001) and a 15.0% increase in distant pressure pain thresholds (50.9 kPa, p = 0.012) following stretching to the point of stretch. We observed a 20.0% increase in regional pressure pain thresholds (90.3 kPa, p = 0.001) and a 15.1% increase in distant pressure pain thresholds (52.1 kPa, p = 0.004) following stretching to the point of pain.

Conclusions

The results showed that local and widespread pain sensitivity decreased following acute stretching, regardless of stretching intensity. No differences in pain sensitivity were found between stretching to the point of stretch or stretching to the first onset of pain. Thus, the results showed no evidence of a dose–response relationship between stretching intensity and the analgesic effect.

Significance

The study showed a significant acute hypoalgesic effect of stretching exercises regardless of stretching intensity. This may have appropriate clinical implications for patients with musculoskeletal and nociplastic pain.

背景：拉伸运动对局部和广泛的疼痛敏感性都有影响。镇痛效果与拉伸强度之间可能存在剂量-反应关系，即拉伸强度越高，镇痛反应的减弱程度越大，但这一点仍有待研究。本研究旨在探讨拉伸强度与镇痛效果之间的剂量反应关系：进行了一项随机、重复测量交叉研究，以检验拉伸至第一疼痛点和拉伸至有拉伸感（不适）点的效果。主要结果是区域和远处压力痛阈值：31名参与者（女性24人）可用于分析。我们观察到，在拉伸至拉伸点后，区域压力痛阈值（93.2 千帕，p = 0.001）增加了 22.2%，远处压力痛阈值（50.9 千帕，p = 0.012）增加了 15.0%。我们观察到，在拉伸至疼痛点后，局部压力痛阈值（90.3 kPa，p = 0.001）增加了 20.0%，远处压力痛阈值（52.1 kPa，p = 0.004）增加了 15.1%：结论：研究结果表明，无论拉伸强度如何，急性拉伸后局部和广泛的疼痛敏感性都会降低。拉伸至疼痛点与拉伸至首次出现疼痛之间的疼痛敏感性没有差异。因此，研究结果没有显示拉伸强度与镇痛效果之间存在剂量反应关系：研究表明，无论拉伸强度如何，拉伸运动都具有明显的急性低镇痛效果。这可能对肌肉骨骼和神经痛患者有适当的临床意义。

{"title":"The effect of stretching intensity on pain sensitivity: A randomized crossover study on healthy adults","authors":"Morten Pallisgaard Støve, Line Ørum Hansen, Kristian Kloppenborg Elmbæk, Stig Peter Magnusson, Janus Laust Thomsen, Allan Riis","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4750","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4750","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Stretching exercises have effects on local and widespread pain sensitivity. A dose–response relationship may exist between the analgesic effect and the intensity of stretching, such that a higher intensity of stretching may generate a larger reduction in analgesic response, but this remains to be studied. This study aimed to examine the dose–response relationship between stretching intensity and the analgesic effect.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A randomized, repeated-measures crossover study was performed to examine the effect of stretching to the first point of pain onset and stretching to the point of a sensation of stretching (discomfort). The primary outcome was regional and distant pressure pain thresholds.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-one participants (<i>n</i> = 24 female) were available for analysis. We observed a 22.2% increase in regional pressure pain thresholds (93.2 kPa, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a 15.0% increase in distant pressure pain thresholds (50.9 kPa, <i>p</i> = 0.012) following stretching to the point of stretch. We observed a 20.0% increase in regional pressure pain thresholds (90.3 kPa, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a 15.1% increase in distant pressure pain thresholds (52.1 kPa, <i>p</i> = 0.004) following stretching to the point of pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The results showed that local and widespread pain sensitivity decreased following acute stretching, regardless of stretching intensity. No differences in pain sensitivity were found between stretching to the point of stretch or stretching to the first onset of pain. Thus, the results showed no evidence of a dose–response relationship between stretching intensity and the analgesic effect.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study showed a significant acute hypoalgesic effect of stretching exercises regardless of stretching intensity. This may have appropriate clinical implications for patients with musculoskeletal and nociplastic pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755707/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Post-injury use of opioid analgesics in patients with traumatic injury: A registry-based study 外伤患者伤后使用阿片类镇痛药的情况：一项基于登记册的研究。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4743

Henrik A. Torp, Svetlana O. Skurtveit, Ingebjørg Gustavsen, Jon M. Gran, Leiv A. Rosseland

Background

Opioid analgesics are commonly used to treat acute and chronic pain following traumatic injury. Psychiatric comorbidity has been reported to be associated with increased pain and persistent opioid use. Our aims were to determine the extent of post-injury opioid use and assess whether pre-injury antidepressant, benzodiazepine, and z-hypnotic drug use is associated with increased post-injury opioid use.

Methods

Data on trauma patients aged 15 years and older included in the Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry between 2005 and 2014 was linked to data from the Norwegian Prescription Database. We identified opioid dispensing within the first 90 and 365 days following trauma and determined subsequent persistent use. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine associations between pre- and post-injury drug use.

Results

3912 of 11,057 patients (35.4%) had opioids dispensed within 90 days after trauma, and 4644 (42.0%) within 365 days. Among 9800 previously opioid-naïve, the proportions were 33.0% and 39.0%, respectively. One year after the first post-injury opioid dispensing, 9.6% of all opioid users and 4.5% of new users were defined as persistent users. Pre-injury benzodiazepine use and z-hypnotic use was associated with new persistent opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–3.45, and aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.33–3.13, respectively), whereas pre-injury antidepressant use was not (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 0.97–2.30).

Conclusions

Opioid use after trauma is widespread. Development of persistent use is limited, particularly in previously opioid-naïve patients. Pre-injury benzodiazepine or z-hypnotic use seem to increase odds of new persistent use.

Significance statement

This large registry-based study adds to the body of knowledge on opioid use beyond in-hospital care in patients having sustained traumatic injury, a field which is scarcely investigated and not yet fully understood. It suggests that both previous drug therapy and the nature of opioid treatment initiation may affect outcome. This will help guide clinicians in selecting the appropriate pain management in this patient group.

背景：阿片类镇痛药常用于治疗外伤后的急性和慢性疼痛。据报道，精神疾病合并症与疼痛加剧和持续使用阿片类药物有关。我们的目的是确定受伤后阿片类药物的使用程度，并评估受伤前使用抗抑郁药、苯二氮卓类药物和z-催眠药是否与受伤后阿片类药物使用增加有关：将奥斯陆大学医院创伤登记处 2005 年至 2014 年期间收录的 15 岁及以上创伤患者数据与挪威处方数据库的数据进行链接。我们确定了创伤后最初 90 天和 365 天内阿片类药物的发放情况，并确定了随后的持续使用情况。我们采用多变量逻辑回归法研究了受伤前和受伤后药物使用之间的关联：在 11,057 名患者中，有 3912 人（35.4%）在创伤后 90 天内使用过阿片类药物，有 4644 人（42.0%）在创伤后 365 天内使用过阿片类药物。在 9800 名之前未使用过阿片类药物的患者中，这一比例分别为 33.0% 和 39.0%。在受伤后首次发放阿片类药物一年后，9.6%的阿片类药物使用者和4.5%的新使用者被定义为持续使用者。受伤前苯二氮卓类药物和z-催眠药的使用与新的阿片类药物的持续使用有关（调整后的几率比[aOR]分别为2.25；95%置信区间[CI]为1.47-3.45和aOR为2.04；95%置信区间[CI]为1.33-3.13），而受伤前抗抑郁药物的使用与之无关（aOR为1.49；95%置信区间[CI]为0.97-2.30）：结论：创伤后阿片类药物的使用非常普遍。结论：外伤后阿片类药物的使用非常普遍，但持续使用的情况有限，尤其是以前未使用过阿片类药物的患者。受伤前使用苯二氮卓或z-催眠药似乎会增加新的持续使用几率：这项以登记为基础的大型研究进一步丰富了有关创伤患者在院内护理之外使用阿片类药物的知识。研究表明，既往的药物治疗和开始阿片类药物治疗的性质可能会影响治疗效果。这将有助于指导临床医生为这一患者群体选择适当的疼痛治疗方法。

{"title":"Post-injury use of opioid analgesics in patients with traumatic injury: A registry-based study","authors":"Henrik A. Torp, Svetlana O. Skurtveit, Ingebjørg Gustavsen, Jon M. Gran, Leiv A. Rosseland","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4743","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4743","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Opioid analgesics are commonly used to treat acute and chronic pain following traumatic injury. Psychiatric comorbidity has been reported to be associated with increased pain and persistent opioid use. Our aims were to determine the extent of post-injury opioid use and assess whether pre-injury antidepressant, benzodiazepine, and z-hypnotic drug use is associated with increased post-injury opioid use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data on trauma patients aged 15 years and older included in the Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry between 2005 and 2014 was linked to data from the Norwegian Prescription Database. We identified opioid dispensing within the first 90 and 365 days following trauma and determined subsequent persistent use. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine associations between pre- and post-injury drug use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>3912 of 11,057 patients (35.4%) had opioids dispensed within 90 days after trauma, and 4644 (42.0%) within 365 days. Among 9800 previously opioid-naïve, the proportions were 33.0% and 39.0%, respectively. One year after the first post-injury opioid dispensing, 9.6% of all opioid users and 4.5% of new users were defined as persistent users. Pre-injury benzodiazepine use and z-hypnotic use was associated with new persistent opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–3.45, and aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.33–3.13, respectively), whereas pre-injury antidepressant use was not (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 0.97–2.30).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Opioid use after trauma is widespread. Development of persistent use is limited, particularly in previously opioid-naïve patients. Pre-injury benzodiazepine or z-hypnotic use seem to increase odds of new persistent use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance statement</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This large registry-based study adds to the body of knowledge on opioid use beyond in-hospital care in patients having sustained traumatic injury, a field which is scarcely investigated and not yet fully understood. It suggests that both previous drug therapy and the nature of opioid treatment initiation may affect outcome. This will help guide clinicians in selecting the appropriate pain management in this patient group.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755689/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Effect of limb position change on capsaicin-evoked pain: Evidence of interplays between the vascular and nociceptive systems? 肢体位置变化对辣椒素诱发疼痛的影响：血管系统与痛觉系统相互作用的证据？

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4742

Arthur S. Courtin, Clara Knaepen, André Mouraux, Sabien Geraldine Antonia van Neerven

Background

This experiment aimed at confirming our incidental observation that, when capsaicin is applied on the volar forearm, raising the arm to a vertical position leads to a dramatic increase in capsaicin-evoked pain and to explore possible underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Twenty healthy volunteers received a 2% capsaicin patch on one forearm and a vehicle patch on the other. Patches were kept in place for 60 min. The perception caused by the patch was assessed repeatedly before, during and after patch application, both with the arm in horizontal resting position and raised vertically. In addition, capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia was assessed using mechanical pinprick stimuli. Half of the participants were seated upright while the other half were lying supine, to assess whether the effect of limb position on capsaicin-evoked pain was due to gravity.

Results

After a few minutes of patch application, raising the capsaicin-treated arm (but not the vehicle-treated arm) led to a strong increase of the pain experienced at the patch. This effect of raising the arm did not differ between participants in the supine and seated groups and is therefore likely related to the position of the arm relative to the ground rather than to the body. Mechanical secondary hyperalgesia and the arm raising effect were strongly decorrelated at the last time point after patch removal, indicating different underlying mechanisms.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that capsaicin-evoked pain can be strongly modulated by limb posture and that this effect may be caused by an interplay between vascular and nociceptive systems.

Significance Statement

Capsaicin-evoked pain can be strongly modulated by limb posture and this effect may be caused by an interplay between vascular and nociceptive systems.

实验背景本实验旨在证实我们的偶然观察结果，即在前臂外侧涂抹辣椒素后，将手臂抬高至垂直位置会导致辣椒素诱发的疼痛剧增，并探索可能的潜在机制：方法：20 名健康志愿者的一只前臂上贴有 2% 的辣椒素贴片，另一只前臂上贴有载体贴片。贴片放置 60 分钟。在贴敷前、贴敷中和贴敷后，在手臂处于水平静止位置和垂直抬起的情况下，对贴敷引起的感觉进行反复评估。此外，还使用机械针刺刺激评估了辣椒素诱发的继发性痛觉减退。一半受试者直立坐着，另一半受试者仰卧，以评估肢体位置对辣椒素诱发疼痛的影响是否是由于重力造成的：结果：贴上贴片几分钟后，抬起经过辣椒素处理的手臂（而不是经过载体处理的手臂）会导致贴片处的疼痛感强烈增加。仰卧组和坐位组的参与者抬起手臂的效果没有差异，因此可能与手臂相对于地面而不是身体的位置有关。在去除贴片后的最后一个时间点，机械性继发性痛觉减退和手臂抬高效应具有很强的相关性，这表明其潜在机制是不同的：我们的研究结果表明，辣椒素诱发的疼痛可受到肢体姿势的强烈调节，这种效应可能是由血管系统和痛觉系统之间的相互作用引起的：辣椒素诱发的疼痛可受到肢体姿势的强烈调节，这种效应可能是由血管系统和痛觉系统之间的相互作用引起的。

{"title":"Effect of limb position change on capsaicin-evoked pain: Evidence of interplays between the vascular and nociceptive systems?","authors":"Arthur S. Courtin, Clara Knaepen, André Mouraux, Sabien Geraldine Antonia van Neerven","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4742","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4742","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This experiment aimed at confirming our incidental observation that, when capsaicin is applied on the volar forearm, raising the arm to a vertical position leads to a dramatic increase in capsaicin-evoked pain and to explore possible underlying mechanisms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty healthy volunteers received a 2% capsaicin patch on one forearm and a vehicle patch on the other. Patches were kept in place for 60 min. The perception caused by the patch was assessed repeatedly before, during and after patch application, both with the arm in horizontal resting position and raised vertically. In addition, capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia was assessed using mechanical pinprick stimuli. Half of the participants were seated upright while the other half were lying supine, to assess whether the effect of limb position on capsaicin-evoked pain was due to gravity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>After a few minutes of patch application, raising the capsaicin-treated arm (but not the vehicle-treated arm) led to a strong increase of the pain experienced at the patch. This effect of raising the arm did not differ between participants in the supine and seated groups and is therefore likely related to the position of the arm relative to the ground rather than to the body. Mechanical secondary hyperalgesia and the arm raising effect were strongly decorrelated at the last time point after patch removal, indicating different underlying mechanisms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our results indicate that capsaicin-evoked pain can be strongly modulated by limb posture and that this effect may be caused by an interplay between vascular and nociceptive systems.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Capsaicin-evoked pain can be strongly modulated by limb posture and this effect may be caused by an interplay between vascular and nociceptive systems.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Pain intensity and comorbid depressive symptoms in the general population: An analysis of the German Health Update Study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS) 普通人群的疼痛强度和合并抑郁症状：德国健康更新研究（GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS）分析。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4745

Jan Niklas Ahrend, Kathrin Jobski, Carsten Bantel, Falk Hoffmann

Background

Pain and depressive symptoms often co-occur, but the influence of pain intensity remains unclear. This study analyses the association between pain intensity and depressive symptoms in the general adult German population.

Methods

Data was obtained from the cross-sectional German Health Update Study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). Pain intensity in the last 4 weeks was categorized into no pain, mild, moderate, and severe. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). The prevalence of depressive symptoms was analysed including a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A multivariable logistic regression analysed associated factors with depressive symptoms by odds ratio (OR).

Results

Of 22,708 participants (51.0% women, 35.1% aged 45–64 years), 41.2% reported no pain, 32.1% mild, 15.3% moderate, and 11.5% severe pain. Depressive symptoms were present in 8.3% overall (women 9.1%, men 7.5%). Participants with no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain reported depressive symptoms in 2.5%, 6.5%, 14.4%, and 27.1%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, higher pain intensity was associated with a higher risk of depressive symptoms (mild pain OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.4; moderate pain OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.0–4.0; severe pain OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.8–5.6). Depressive symptoms were further associated with a Body Mass Index (BMI) under 18.5 kg m⁻² (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.4–4.1), but not with sex (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.9–1.3).

Conclusions

Higher pain intensity increases the risk of depressive symptoms. We suggest regular assessment of pain and further assessment of depressive symptoms in patients with moderate or severe pain.

Significance Statement

Our study found a clear association between higher pain intensity and depressive symptoms in the general population across all types of pain. Further, being underweight was linked to depressive symptoms overall and the highest prevalence of depressive symptoms was found in underweight persons with severe pain. These findings highlight the importance of assessing depressive symptoms in patients with higher pain intensity, especially in underweight patients.

背景：疼痛和抑郁症状经常同时出现，但疼痛强度的影响仍不明确。本研究分析了德国成年普通人群中疼痛强度与抑郁症状之间的关联：数据来自横断面德国健康更新研究（GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS）。最近4周的疼痛强度分为无痛、轻度、中度和重度。抑郁症状采用 8 项患者健康问卷（PHQ-8）进行评估。抑郁症状发生率的分析包括 95% 置信区间 (95% CI)。多变量逻辑回归通过几率比（OR）分析了与抑郁症状相关的因素：在 22 708 名参与者（51.0% 为女性，35.1% 年龄在 45-64 岁之间）中，41.2% 报告无疼痛，32.1% 报告轻度疼痛，15.3% 报告中度疼痛，11.5% 报告重度疼痛。有抑郁症状的人占总人数的 8.3%（女性占 9.1%，男性占 7.5%）。无疼痛、轻度、中度和重度疼痛的参与者中，分别有 2.5%、6.5%、14.4% 和 27.1% 出现抑郁症状。在多变量分析中，疼痛强度越高，出现抑郁症状的风险越高（轻度疼痛 OR 1.8，95% CI 1.3-2.4；中度疼痛 OR 2.8，95% CI 2.0-4.0；重度疼痛 OR 4.0，95% CI 2.8-5.6）。抑郁症状还与体重指数（BMI）低于 18.5 kg m-2 有关（OR 2.4；95% CI 1.4-4.1），但与性别无关（OR 1.1；95% CI 0.9-1.3）：结论：疼痛强度越高，抑郁症状的风险越大。我们建议中度或重度疼痛患者定期进行疼痛评估，并进一步评估抑郁症状：我们的研究发现，在所有类型的疼痛中，疼痛强度越高，抑郁症状越明显。此外，体重不足与抑郁症状总体相关，而体重不足的重度疼痛患者抑郁症状发生率最高。这些发现强调了对疼痛强度较高的患者，尤其是体重不足的患者进行抑郁症状评估的重要性。

{"title":"Pain intensity and comorbid depressive symptoms in the general population: An analysis of the German Health Update Study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS)","authors":"Jan Niklas Ahrend, Kathrin Jobski, Carsten Bantel, Falk Hoffmann","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4745","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4745","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pain and depressive symptoms often co-occur, but the influence of pain intensity remains unclear. This study analyses the association between pain intensity and depressive symptoms in the general adult German population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data was obtained from the cross-sectional German Health Update Study (GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS). Pain intensity in the last 4 weeks was categorized into no pain, mild, moderate, and severe. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). The prevalence of depressive symptoms was analysed including a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A multivariable logistic regression analysed associated factors with depressive symptoms by odds ratio (OR).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Of 22,708 participants (51.0% women, 35.1% aged 45–64 years), 41.2% reported no pain, 32.1% mild, 15.3% moderate, and 11.5% severe pain. Depressive symptoms were present in 8.3% overall (women 9.1%, men 7.5%). Participants with no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain reported depressive symptoms in 2.5%, 6.5%, 14.4%, and 27.1%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, higher pain intensity was associated with a higher risk of depressive symptoms (mild pain OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.4; moderate pain OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.0–4.0; severe pain OR 4.0, 95% CI 2.8–5.6). Depressive symptoms were further associated with a Body Mass Index (BMI) under 18.5 kg m<sup>−2</sup> (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.4–4.1), but not with sex (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.9–1.3).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Higher pain intensity increases the risk of depressive symptoms. We suggest regular assessment of pain and further assessment of depressive symptoms in patients with moderate or severe pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study found a clear association between higher pain intensity and depressive symptoms in the general population across all types of pain. Further, being underweight was linked to depressive symptoms overall and the highest prevalence of depressive symptoms was found in underweight persons with severe pain. These findings highlight the importance of assessing depressive symptoms in patients with higher pain intensity, especially in underweight patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A randomized clinical trial of emotional freedom techniques for chronic pain: Live versus self-paced delivery with 6-month follow-up 情绪自由技术治疗慢性疼痛的随机临床试验：现场授课与自学授课，6 个月随访。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4740

Peta Stapleton, Clara Wilson, Nicola Uechtritz, Michele Stewart, Michelle McCosker, Tom O'Keefe, Matthew Blanchard

Background

Chronic pain represents a major global healthcare crisis, and current treatments are limited in effectiveness and safety. Emotional freedom techniques (EFTs) show promise as a potential psychological treatment.

Methods

The current study investigated the effect of a randomized clinical trial of EFT for chronic pain in a sample of 147 adult chronic pain sufferers (89.9% female; mean 54.63 years). Participants engaged in a 6-week EFT programme (either online self-paced or in-person).

Results

The per-protocol analysis indicated pain severity and interference scores were significantly lower at the end of treatment for the EFT group compared to waitlist, and these were sustained at follow-up. There were no differences between the in-person or self-paced programmes at follow-up for pain severity and interference. Somatic symptoms were significantly lower after EFT, although no further differences at follow-up. Quality of life scores were significantly higher after EFT, which were sustained at follow-up, and no differences between two styles of programme. No significant effects were found for anxiety, depression, happiness or satisfaction with life across the 6-week programmes for either style of delivery or at follow-up. These are discussed in terms of clinical score meanings. Intent-to-treat analysis was consistent with the per-protocol analyses. Limitations of the study are identified and future directions are discussed.

Conclusions

Findings offer early promise for EFT as a potentially effective pain management strategy, as well as support for online intervention without compromising treatment outcomes.

Significance Statement

An emerging body-based intervention for chronic pain may be a possible solution for remote clients who cannot attend in-person sessions. In this clinical trial Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) significantly reduced chronic pain severity and interference, and there were no differences between and online self-paced program toan online in-person EFT intervention. Both were equally effective, also enhancing quality of life without compromising outcomes. The results were significant at 6-month follow-up/. These findings highlight a body-based approach as a promising, accessible pain management strategy, and highlights that online programs may be part of the solution for chronic pain patients.

背景：慢性疼痛是全球医疗保健的一大危机，而目前的治疗方法在有效性和安全性方面都很有限。情绪自由技术（EFT）作为一种潜在的心理治疗方法前景广阔：本研究调查了在 147 名成年慢性疼痛患者（89.9% 为女性，平均 54.63 岁）中开展的 EFT 治疗慢性疼痛随机临床试验的效果。参与者参加了为期 6 周的 EFT 计划（在线自学或面对面学习）：结果：按协议分析表明，在治疗结束时，EFT组的疼痛严重程度和干扰评分明显低于候补名单组，并且在随访中保持不变。在随访中，面对面或自定进度方案在疼痛严重程度和干扰方面没有差异。EFT 治疗后，躯体症状明显减轻，但在随访时没有进一步的差异。经 EFT 治疗后，生活质量得分明显提高，并在随访中保持不变，两种治疗方式之间没有差异。对于焦虑、抑郁、幸福感或对生活的满意度，无论是哪种方式的 6 周课程或随访都没有发现明显的效果。我们将从临床评分的角度对这些影响进行讨论。意向治疗分析与按协议分析一致。本文指出了研究的局限性，并讨论了未来的研究方向：研究结果为 EFT 作为一种潜在有效的疼痛管理策略提供了早期希望，并支持在不影响治疗效果的情况下进行在线干预：一种新出现的以身体为基础的慢性疼痛干预方法可能会成为无法参加现场治疗的远程客户的一种解决方案。在这项临床试验中，情绪自由技术（EFT）显著降低了慢性疼痛的严重程度和干扰，在线自定进度程序与在线面对面 EFT 干预之间没有差异。两种方法同样有效，都能在不影响治疗效果的情况下提高生活质量。在6个月的随访中，效果显著。这些研究结果表明，以身体为基础的方法是一种很有前景的、易于接受的疼痛管理策略，并强调在线项目可能是慢性疼痛患者解决方案的一部分。

{"title":"A randomized clinical trial of emotional freedom techniques for chronic pain: Live versus self-paced delivery with 6-month follow-up","authors":"Peta Stapleton, Clara Wilson, Nicola Uechtritz, Michele Stewart, Michelle McCosker, Tom O'Keefe, Matthew Blanchard","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4740","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4740","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Chronic pain represents a major global healthcare crisis, and current treatments are limited in effectiveness and safety. Emotional freedom techniques (EFTs) show promise as a potential psychological treatment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The current study investigated the effect of a randomized clinical trial of EFT for chronic pain in a sample of 147 adult chronic pain sufferers (89.9% female; mean 54.63 years). Participants engaged in a 6-week EFT programme (either online self-paced or in-person).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The per-protocol analysis indicated pain severity and interference scores were significantly lower at the end of treatment for the EFT group compared to waitlist, and these were sustained at follow-up. There were no differences between the in-person or self-paced programmes at follow-up for pain severity and interference. Somatic symptoms were significantly lower after EFT, although no further differences at follow-up. Quality of life scores were significantly higher after EFT, which were sustained at follow-up, and no differences between two styles of programme. No significant effects were found for anxiety, depression, happiness or satisfaction with life across the 6-week programmes for either style of delivery or at follow-up. These are discussed in terms of clinical score meanings. Intent-to-treat analysis was consistent with the per-protocol analyses. Limitations of the study are identified and future directions are discussed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Findings offer early promise for EFT as a potentially effective pain management strategy, as well as support for online intervention without compromising treatment outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An emerging body-based intervention for chronic pain may be a possible solution for remote clients who cannot attend in-person sessions. In this clinical trial Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) significantly reduced chronic pain severity and interference, and there were no differences between and online self-paced program toan online in-person EFT intervention. Both were equally effective, also enhancing quality of life without compromising outcomes. The results were significant at 6-month follow-up/. These findings highlight a body-based approach as a promising, accessible pain management strategy, and highlights that online programs may be part of the solution for chronic pain patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Signs of hyperpathia in chronic peripheral neuropathic pain 慢性外周神经性疼痛中的过度紧张征兆

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4739

Malin Erika Carmland, Melissa Dall Kreutzfeldt, Peter Kolind Brask-Thomsen, Troels Staehelin Jensen, Flemming Winther Bach, Søren Hein Sindrup, Nanna Brix Finnerup

Background

Neuropathic pain is pain due to a disease or lesion of the somatosensory system, and can be either spontaneous, evoked or both. Hyperpathia is a type of evoked pain defined by IASP as ‘a painful syndrome characterized by an abnormally painful reaction to a stimulus, especially a repetitive stimulus, as well as an increased threshold’. The literature is sparse, and definitions are unclear and inconsistent.

Methods

The aim of this study was to examine for the presence of mechanical hyperpathia in a heterogeneous group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain and correlate signs of hyperpathia with other sensory signs. Patients were examined with graded pinprick stimuli to obtain a stimulus–response curve and repetitive pinprick stimuli to assess increase in pain over time and aftersensations. Then, patients were grouped based on the likelihood of having mechanical hyperpathia with either a steep stimulus–response curve or a steep curve on the repetitive pinprick test and results were correlated to mechanical detection and pain thresholds and other outcomes from a full quantitative sensory testing.

Results

We included 124 patients with documented peripheral neuropathic pain. Patients with a steep stimulus–response curve did not overlap with patients with a steep curve on the repetitive pinprick test and both groups more often had decreased rather than increased detection and pain thresholds.

Conclusions

Our study questions the concept of hyperpathia and suggests that more studies are needed to identify which symptoms and signs group together and might form a syndrome.

Significance Statement

Hyperpathia is a syndrome of evoked pain. It is poorly defined and little is known about its clinical presentation. Since it is part of pain symptomatology it is important to have a clear definition and understand the pathophysiology behind. This study explored signs of hyperpathia in a heterogeneous group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. We used stimulus–response function and repetitive pinprick stimulation to group patients based on the IASP definition. More studies are needed to understand how symptoms and signs coincide.

背景：神经病理性疼痛是由于躯体感觉系统的疾病或病变引起的疼痛，可以是自发的，也可以是诱发的或两者兼有。超病理性疼痛是诱发性疼痛的一种类型，国际疼痛学会（IASP）将其定义为 "一种疼痛综合征，其特征是对刺激（尤其是重复性刺激）的异常疼痛反应以及阈值升高"。相关文献较少，定义不明确且不一致：本研究的目的是检查不同类型的周围神经痛患者是否存在机械性过度紧张，并将过度紧张的迹象与其他感觉迹象联系起来。对患者进行分级针刺刺激检查，以获得刺激-反应曲线，并进行重复针刺刺激检查，以评估疼痛随时间推移而增加的情况和后遗症状。然后，根据刺激-反应曲线陡峭或重复针刺试验曲线陡峭的机械性神经过敏的可能性对患者进行分组，并将结果与机械检测和疼痛阈值以及全面定量感觉测试的其他结果相关联：我们纳入了124名有外周神经病理性疼痛记录的患者。刺激-反应曲线陡峭的患者与重复针刺试验曲线陡峭的患者并不重叠，两组患者的检测和疼痛阈值通常都是降低而非升高：我们的研究对 "过度紧张症 "的概念提出了质疑，并建议需要进行更多的研究，以确定哪些症状和体征组合在一起可能会形成一种综合征：过度紧张症是一种诱发疼痛的综合征。其定义尚不明确，临床表现也鲜为人知。由于它是疼痛症状学的一部分，因此明确定义并了解其背后的病理生理学非常重要。本研究探讨了外周神经病理性疼痛异质性患者群体中的过度紧张迹象。我们使用刺激-反应功能和重复针刺刺激，根据 IASP 定义对患者进行分组。要了解症状和体征是如何重合的，还需要更多的研究。

{"title":"Signs of hyperpathia in chronic peripheral neuropathic pain","authors":"Malin Erika Carmland, Melissa Dall Kreutzfeldt, Peter Kolind Brask-Thomsen, Troels Staehelin Jensen, Flemming Winther Bach, Søren Hein Sindrup, Nanna Brix Finnerup","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4739","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4739","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Neuropathic pain is pain due to a disease or lesion of the somatosensory system, and can be either spontaneous, evoked or both. Hyperpathia is a type of evoked pain defined by IASP as ‘a painful syndrome characterized by an abnormally painful reaction to a stimulus, especially a repetitive stimulus, as well as an increased threshold’. The literature is sparse, and definitions are unclear and inconsistent.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of this study was to examine for the presence of mechanical hyperpathia in a heterogeneous group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain and correlate signs of hyperpathia with other sensory signs. Patients were examined with graded pinprick stimuli to obtain a stimulus–response curve and repetitive pinprick stimuli to assess increase in pain over time and aftersensations. Then, patients were grouped based on the likelihood of having mechanical hyperpathia with either a steep stimulus–response curve or a steep curve on the repetitive pinprick test and results were correlated to mechanical detection and pain thresholds and other outcomes from a full quantitative sensory testing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included 124 patients with documented peripheral neuropathic pain. Patients with a steep stimulus–response curve did not overlap with patients with a steep curve on the repetitive pinprick test and both groups more often had decreased rather than increased detection and pain thresholds.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study questions the concept of hyperpathia and suggests that more studies are needed to identify which symptoms and signs group together and might form a syndrome.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Hyperpathia is a syndrome of evoked pain. It is poorly defined and little is known about its clinical presentation. Since it is part of pain symptomatology it is important to have a clear definition and understand the pathophysiology behind. This study explored signs of hyperpathia in a heterogeneous group of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. We used stimulus–response function and repetitive pinprick stimulation to group patients based on the IASP definition. More studies are needed to understand how symptoms and signs coincide.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755698/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lower thresholds and stronger adaptation to pain in musicians reflect occupational-specific adaptations to contact heat stimulation 音乐家较低的疼痛阈值和较强的疼痛适应能力反映了接触热刺激的职业特异性适应。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4738

Rebecca Divarco, Fabian Sternkopf, Matthias Karst, Eckart Altenmüller, Perianen Ramasawmy, Andrea Antal, André Lee

Background

Extensive audio-motor training and psychological stress can cause professional musicians acute overstrain-injury and chronic pain, resulting in damaged careers and diminished quality of life. It has also been previously shown that musicians might perceive pain differently than non-musicians. Therefore, the aim of our study was to quantify differences between musicians and non-musicians regarding their subjective responses to painful contact heat stimuli and assess how emotional traits might influence these responses.

Methods

Upon completing the StateTrait-Anxiety-Depression Inventory, 15 healthy musicians and 15 healthy non-musicians from German universities received 15 noxious contact heat stimuli at the dorsal side of each hand and foot. After each stimulation, participants were asked to provide a pain rating from 0 to 10.

Results

Musicians not only reported significantly higher pain ratings after the first stimulation but also showed a significantly higher degree of habituation compared to non-musicians. Additionally, musicians showed a significantly less pronounced difference regarding the pain rating of the hands compared to the feet than non-musicians. Trait anxiety and trait depression scores had no effect on the pain rating or the habituation.

Conclusion

The more pronounced habituation of musicians might hint at a neuroplastic nociceptive alteration in musicians. The lack of significance between the psychological traits and their effect on the pain ratings is surprising but could be a result of both participant groups having stressful careers.

Significance

The findings of this report justify musicians' repetitive sensorimotor training as an important model for plasticity and contribute to a better understanding of pain perception in musicians.

背景：大量的音频运动训练和心理压力会导致职业音乐家急性过度劳损和慢性疼痛，从而损害其职业生涯并降低其生活质量。此前也有研究表明，音乐家对疼痛的感知可能与非音乐家不同。因此，我们的研究旨在量化音乐家与非音乐家对疼痛接触热刺激的主观反应差异，并评估情绪特征如何影响这些反应：来自德国大学的 15 名健康音乐家和 15 名健康非音乐家在完成状态特质-焦虑-抑郁量表后，分别在手背和脚背接受了 15 次有害接触热刺激。每次刺激后，受试者都要给出 0 到 10 分的疼痛评分：结果：与非音乐家相比，音乐家不仅在第一次刺激后的疼痛评分明显更高，而且习惯程度也明显更高。此外，与非音乐家相比，音乐家手部与脚部的疼痛评分差异明显较小。特质焦虑和特质抑郁得分对疼痛评级和习惯化没有影响：结论：音乐家更明显的习惯化可能暗示了音乐家神经可塑性痛觉改变。心理特征及其对疼痛评级的影响之间缺乏显著性令人惊讶，但这可能是两个参与者群体的职业压力所致：本报告的研究结果证明，音乐家的重复感觉运动训练是一种重要的可塑性模型，有助于更好地理解音乐家的痛觉。

{"title":"Lower thresholds and stronger adaptation to pain in musicians reflect occupational-specific adaptations to contact heat stimulation","authors":"Rebecca Divarco, Fabian Sternkopf, Matthias Karst, Eckart Altenmüller, Perianen Ramasawmy, Andrea Antal, André Lee","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4738","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4738","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Extensive audio-motor training and psychological stress can cause professional musicians acute overstrain-injury and chronic pain, resulting in damaged careers and diminished quality of life. It has also been previously shown that musicians might perceive pain differently than non-musicians. Therefore, the aim of our study was to quantify differences between musicians and non-musicians regarding their subjective responses to painful contact heat stimuli and assess how emotional traits might influence these responses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Upon completing the StateTrait-Anxiety-Depression Inventory, 15 healthy musicians and 15 healthy non-musicians from German universities received 15 noxious contact heat stimuli at the dorsal side of each hand and foot. After each stimulation, participants were asked to provide a pain rating from 0 to 10.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Musicians not only reported significantly higher pain ratings after the first stimulation but also showed a significantly higher degree of habituation compared to non-musicians. Additionally, musicians showed a significantly less pronounced difference regarding the pain rating of the hands compared to the feet than non-musicians. Trait anxiety and trait depression scores had no effect on the pain rating or the habituation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The more pronounced habituation of musicians might hint at a neuroplastic nociceptive alteration in musicians. The lack of significance between the psychological traits and their effect on the pain ratings is surprising but could be a result of both participant groups having stressful careers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings of this report justify musicians' repetitive sensorimotor training as an important model for plasticity and contribute to a better understanding of pain perception in musicians.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Pain profiles and variability in temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation in pain-free individuals and patients with low back pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia 无痛者和腰背痛、骨关节炎和纤维肌痛患者的疼痛特征以及疼痛和条件性疼痛调节的时间总和的变异性。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4741

Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Søren O'Neill, Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt, Casper Nim, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Henrik Bjarke Vægter

<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Pain profiles (e.g. pro- and anti-nociceptive) can be developed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) but substantial variability exists. This study describes the variability in temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients, proposes cut-off values, and explores the association with clinical pain intensity.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>This is a secondary analysis in which TSP and CPM were assessed using cuff algometry in pain-free subjects (<i>n</i> = 69), and patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP, <i>n</i> = 267), osteoarthritis (<i>n</i> = 134), and fibromyalgia (<i>n</i> = 101). Using TSP and CPM from the pain-free subjects as a reference, four distinct pain profiles TSP (low/high) and CPM (low/high) were created, and differences in clinical pain between pain profiles were explored.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Individual data revealed large inter-person variability. High TSP and low CPM were found in fibromyalgia (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and osteoarthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.01) but not cLBP when compared to pain-free subjects. The proportion of patients classified into the distinct pain profiles was significantly different (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with the largest proportion in the high TSP and low CPM group in fibromyalgia (52.5%) and osteoarthritis (41.4%). Clinical pain was not significantly different comparing the pain profiles, and no significant correlations were observed between clinical pain and TSP or CPM.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>These results demonstrated substantial inter-person variability in TSP and CPM in patients with different chronic pain conditions and pain-free subjects. The proportion of patients with a pro-nociceptive profile appears larger in fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis, but we found no association to clinical pain.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Significant Statement</h3> <p>This analysis shows that there is variability when assessing TSP and CPM in both pain-free subjects and patients with chronic pain. A cut-off for determining when a person is pain-sensitive is proposed, and data based on this cut-off approach suggest that significantly more patients with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia are pain-sensitive (i.e. higher TSP and lower CPM) compared to pain-free subjects. This analysis does not find an association between pain sensitivity and clinical pain.<

背景：定量感觉测试（QST）可得出疼痛特征（如促痛和抗痛），但存在很大的变异性。本研究描述了慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛时间总和（TSP）和条件性疼痛调节（CPM）的变异性，提出了临界值，并探讨了与临床疼痛强度的关联：这是一项二次分析，在无痛受试者（n = 69）和慢性腰背痛（cLBP，n = 267）、骨关节炎（n = 134）和纤维肌痛（n = 101）患者中使用袖带算法评估 TSP 和 CPM。以无痛受试者的 TSP 和 CPM 为参照，建立了四种不同的疼痛特征 TSP（低/高）和 CPM（低/高），并探讨了不同疼痛特征之间临床疼痛的差异：结果：个体数据显示，人与人之间的差异很大。结果：个体数据显示，人与人之间的差异很大，纤维肌痛患者的 TSP 高，CPM 低（p 结论：这些结果表明，人与人之间的疼痛差异很大：这些结果表明，不同慢性疼痛患者和无痛受试者的 TSP 和 CPM 存在很大的个体差异。纤维肌痛和骨关节炎患者中具有亲痛觉特征的比例似乎更大，但我们没有发现这与临床疼痛有关：该分析表明，在评估无痛受试者和慢性疼痛患者的 TSP 和 CPM 时存在差异。我们提出了确定一个人何时对疼痛敏感的临界值，根据这种临界值方法得出的数据表明，与无疼痛的受试者相比，骨关节炎和纤维肌痛患者对疼痛敏感的人数要多得多（即 TSP 较高，CPM 较低）。本分析未发现疼痛敏感度与临床疼痛之间存在关联。

{"title":"Pain profiles and variability in temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation in pain-free individuals and patients with low back pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia","authors":"Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Søren O'Neill, Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt, Casper Nim, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Henrik Bjarke Vægter","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4741","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4741","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pain profiles (e.g. pro- and anti-nociceptive) can be developed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) but substantial variability exists. This study describes the variability in temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients, proposes cut-off values, and explores the association with clinical pain intensity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This is a secondary analysis in which TSP and CPM were assessed using cuff algometry in pain-free subjects (<i>n</i> = 69), and patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP, <i>n</i> = 267), osteoarthritis (<i>n</i> = 134), and fibromyalgia (<i>n</i> = 101). Using TSP and CPM from the pain-free subjects as a reference, four distinct pain profiles TSP (low/high) and CPM (low/high) were created, and differences in clinical pain between pain profiles were explored.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Individual data revealed large inter-person variability. High TSP and low CPM were found in fibromyalgia (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and osteoarthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.01) but not cLBP when compared to pain-free subjects. The proportion of patients classified into the distinct pain profiles was significantly different (<i>p</i> < 0.001) with the largest proportion in the high TSP and low CPM group in fibromyalgia (52.5%) and osteoarthritis (41.4%). Clinical pain was not significantly different comparing the pain profiles, and no significant correlations were observed between clinical pain and TSP or CPM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These results demonstrated substantial inter-person variability in TSP and CPM in patients with different chronic pain conditions and pain-free subjects. The proportion of patients with a pro-nociceptive profile appears larger in fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis, but we found no association to clinical pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significant Statement</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This analysis shows that there is variability when assessing TSP and CPM in both pain-free subjects and patients with chronic pain. A cut-off for determining when a person is pain-sensitive is proposed, and data based on this cut-off approach suggest that significantly more patients with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia are pain-sensitive (i.e. higher TSP and lower CPM) compared to pain-free subjects. This analysis does not find an association between pain sensitivity and clinical pain.<","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755398/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Peak alpha frequency differs between chronic back pain and chronic widespread pain 慢性背痛和慢性广泛性疼痛的阿尔法峰值频率不同。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4737

Natalie McLain, Rocco Cavaleri, Jason Kutch

Background

Low peak alpha frequency (PAF) is an electroencephalography (EEG) outcome associated reliably with high acute pain sensitivity. However, existing research suggests that the relationship between PAF and chronic pain is more variable. This variability could be attributable to chronic pain groups typically being examined as homogenous populations, without consideration being given to potential diagnosis-specific differences. Indeed, while emerging work has compared individuals with chronic pain to healthy controls, no previous studies have examined differences in PAF between diagnoses or across chronic pain subtypes.

Methods

To address this gap, we reanalysed a dataset of resting state EEG previously used to demonstrate a lack of difference in PAF between individuals with chronic pain and healthy controls. In this new analysis, we separated patients by diagnosis before comparing PAF across three subgroups: chronic widespread pain (n = 30), chronic back pain (n = 38), and healthy controls (n = 87).

Results

We replicate the original finding of no significant difference between chronic pain groups and controls, but also find that individuals with widespread pain had significantly higher global average PAF values than those of people with chronic back pain [p = 0.028, β = 0.25 Hz] after controlling for age, sex, and depression.

Conclusions

These novel findings reveal PAF values in individuals with chronic pain may be diagnosis-specific and not uniformly shifted from the values of healthy controls. Future studies should account for diagnosis and be cautious with exploring homogenous ‘chronic pain’ classifications during investigations of PAF.

Significance

Our work suggests that, contrary to previous hypotheses, inter-individual differences in PAF reflect diagnosis-specific mechanisms rather than the general presence of chronic pain, and therefore may have important implications for future work regarding individually-tailored pain management strategies.

背景：低峰值α频率（PAF）是一种脑电图（EEG）结果，与急性疼痛敏感性高有可靠的联系。然而，现有研究表明，PAF 与慢性疼痛之间的关系变化较大。造成这种差异的原因可能是慢性疼痛群体通常被作为同质人群进行研究，而没有考虑潜在的特定诊断差异。事实上，虽然新近的研究将慢性疼痛患者与健康对照组进行了比较，但之前的研究并未对不同诊断或不同慢性疼痛亚型的 PAF 差异进行研究：为了填补这一空白，我们重新分析了静息状态脑电图数据集，该数据集曾用于证明慢性疼痛患者与健康对照组之间的 PAF 没有差异。在这项新的分析中，我们按照诊断将患者分开，然后比较三个亚组的 PAF：慢性广泛性疼痛（30 人）、慢性背痛（38 人）和健康对照组（87 人）：结果：我们重复了原来的发现，即慢性疼痛组与对照组之间无显著差异，但同时发现，在控制年龄、性别和抑郁后，广泛性疼痛患者的全球平均 PAF 值明显高于慢性背痛患者[p = 0.028，β = 0.25 Hz]：这些新发现揭示了慢性疼痛患者的 PAF 值可能具有诊断特异性，而且与健康对照组的 PAF 值偏移不一致。未来的研究应考虑诊断因素，并在调查 PAF 时谨慎探索同质化的 "慢性疼痛 "分类：我们的研究结果表明，与之前的假设相反，PAF 的个体间差异反映的是诊断特异性机制，而不是慢性疼痛的普遍存在。

{"title":"Peak alpha frequency differs between chronic back pain and chronic widespread pain","authors":"Natalie McLain, Rocco Cavaleri, Jason Kutch","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4737","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4737","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Low peak alpha frequency (PAF) is an electroencephalography (EEG) outcome associated reliably with high acute pain sensitivity. However, existing research suggests that the relationship between PAF and chronic pain is more variable. This variability could be attributable to chronic pain groups typically being examined as homogenous populations, without consideration being given to potential diagnosis-specific differences. Indeed, while emerging work has compared individuals with chronic pain to healthy controls, no previous studies have examined differences in PAF between diagnoses or across chronic pain subtypes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To address this gap, we reanalysed a dataset of resting state EEG previously used to demonstrate a lack of difference in PAF between individuals with chronic pain and healthy controls. In this new analysis, we separated patients by diagnosis before comparing PAF across three subgroups: chronic widespread pain (<i>n</i> = 30), chronic back pain (<i>n</i> = 38), and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 87).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We replicate the original finding of no significant difference between chronic pain groups and controls, but also find that individuals with widespread pain had significantly higher global average PAF values than those of people with chronic back pain [<i>p</i> = 0.028, <i>β</i> = 0.25 Hz] after controlling for age, sex, and depression.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These novel findings reveal PAF values in individuals with chronic pain may be diagnosis-specific and not uniformly shifted from the values of healthy controls. Future studies should account for diagnosis and be cautious with exploring homogenous ‘chronic pain’ classifications during investigations of PAF.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our work suggests that, contrary to previous hypotheses, inter-individual differences in PAF reflect diagnosis-specific mechanisms rather than the general presence of chronic pain, and therefore may have important implications for future work regarding individually-tailored pain management strategies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142380341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Navigating the light and shadow of scientific publishing faced with machine learning and generative AI 面对机器学习和生成式人工智能，在科学出版的光与影中航行。

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

European Journal of Pain

Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4736

Federico Palmisani, Daniel Segelcke, Jan Vollert

Background

The public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 sparked a boom and public interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) that has led to journals and journal families hastily releasing generative AI policies, ranging from asking authors for acknowledgement or declaration to the outright banning of use.

Results

Here, we briefly discuss the basics of machine learning, generative AI, and how it will affect scientific publishing. We focus especially on potential risks and benefits to the scientific community as a whole and journals specifically.

Conclusion

While the concerns of editors, for example about manufactured studies, are valid, some recently implemented or suggested policies will not be sustainable in the long run. The quality of generated text and code is quickly becoming so high that it will not only be impossible to detect the use of generative AI but would also mean taking a powerful tool away from researchers that can make their life easier every day.

Significance

We discuss the history and current state of AI and highlight its relevance for medical publishing and pain research. We provide guidance on how to act now to increase good scientific practice in the world of ChatGPT and call for a task force focusing on improving publishing pain research with use of generative AI.

背景：2022年11月公开发布的ChatGPT引发了生成式人工智能（AI）的热潮和公众兴趣，导致期刊和期刊家族匆忙发布生成式人工智能政策，从要求作者致谢或声明到直接禁止使用不等：在此，我们简要讨论了机器学习、生成式人工智能的基本原理，以及它将如何影响科学出版。我们尤其关注它对整个科学界和期刊的潜在风险和益处：虽然编辑们的担忧是合理的，例如对人造研究的担忧，但最近实施或建议的一些政策从长远来看是不可持续的。生成文本和代码的质量正在迅速变得如此之高，以至于不仅不可能发现生成式人工智能的使用，而且还意味着从研究人员手中夺走了一个可以让他们每天的生活更轻松的强大工具：我们讨论了人工智能的历史和现状，并强调了其与医学出版业和疼痛研究的相关性。我们为现在如何采取行动以提高ChatGPT领域的良好科学实践提供了指导，并呼吁成立一个特别工作组，专注于利用生成式人工智能改进疼痛研究的出版工作。

{"title":"Navigating the light and shadow of scientific publishing faced with machine learning and generative AI","authors":"Federico Palmisani, Daniel Segelcke, Jan Vollert","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4736","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejp.4736","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 sparked a boom and public interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) that has led to journals and journal families hastily releasing generative AI policies, ranging from asking authors for acknowledgement or declaration to the outright banning of use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Here, we briefly discuss the basics of machine learning, generative AI, and how it will affect scientific publishing. We focus especially on potential risks and benefits to the scientific community as a whole and journals specifically.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While the concerns of editors, for example about manufactured studies, are valid, some recently implemented or suggested policies will not be sustainable in the long run. The quality of generated text and code is quickly becoming so high that it will not only be impossible to detect the use of generative AI but would also mean taking a powerful tool away from researchers that can make their life easier every day.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We discuss the history and current state of AI and highlight its relevance for medical publishing and pain research. We provide guidance on how to act now to increase good scientific practice in the world of ChatGPT and call for a task force focusing on improving publishing pain research with use of generative AI.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755395/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0