Objective The final surgical pathology report follows the patient throughout their cancer journey. For locoregionally advanced cancers, lack of surgeon-pathologist communication can lead to understaging, adversely impacting management. Our study aims to improve the accuracy of staging grossly invasive thyroid cancer by introducing an anatomic checklist, enhancing surgeon-pathologist communication. Methods We studied 35 consecutive patients with either gross extrathyroidal or extranodal extension, 29 of whom underwent primary resections requiring AJCC staging. Surgeon A initially only dictated an operative report. Surgeon B transmitted an anatomic checklist to the pathologist in addition to the standard operative note. Final pathology reports were reviewed for AJCC staging accuracy. Surgeon A transitioned to submission of an anatomic checklist for his final 6 cases. Results 13 of the 14 final pathology reports without a checklist, were understaged. All 15 cases with a surgeon completed anatomic checklist were accurately staged. There was a statistically significant improvement in the accuracy of staging reported in the final pathology reports when an anatomic checklist was submitted as compared to when it was not (p<0.01, Fisher exact test, two-tailed). All of the final pathology reports for recurrent cases without a checklist failed to define anatomic parts that were resected. The time to complete the checklist was less than 90 seconds. Conclusion A surgeon completed anatomic checklist allows pathologists to more accurately stage grossly invasive thyroid cancers. This rapidly completed form eliminates the need for a pathologist to analyze the operative note and facilitates both risk of recurrence and AJCC determination.