首页 > 最新文献

Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal最新文献

英文 中文
Oral antihistamine–decongestant–analgesic combinations for the common cold—do they work? 口服抗组胺-减充血-镇痛联合治疗普通感冒有效吗?
Pub Date : 2013-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1947
Ricardo Fernandes

Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.

生态儿科是《基于证据的儿童健康:Cochrane评论杂志》中偶尔出现的特色。我们的目标是促进世界范围内关于减少卫生保健浪费的讨论。在每一期中,我们将选择一篇最近的Cochrane综述,重点介绍一种仍在使用的做法,现有证据告诉我们应该停止这种做法。
{"title":"Oral antihistamine–decongestant–analgesic combinations for the common cold—do they work?","authors":"Ricardo Fernandes","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1947","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1947","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1947","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83918758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Parent-mediated early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) 幼儿自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的家长干预
Pub Date : 2013-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1952
Inalegwu P Oono, Emma J Honey, Helen McConachie

Background

Young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have impairments in the areas of communication and social interaction and often display repetitive or non-compliant behaviour. This early pattern of difficulties is a challenge for parents. Therefore, approaches that help parents develop strategies for interaction and management of behaviour are an obvious route for early intervention in ASD. This review updates a Cochrane review first published in 2002 but is based on a new protocol.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of parent-mediated early interventions in terms of the benefits for both children with ASD and their parents and to explore some potential moderators of treatment effect.

Search methods

We searched a range of psychological, educational and biomedical databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and ERIC in August 2012. As this is an update of a previous review, we limited the search to the period following the original searches in 2002. Bibliographies and reference lists of key articles were searched, field experts were contacted and key journals were handsearched.

Selection criteria

We included only randomised controlled trials of early intervention for children with ASD. The interventions in the experimental condition were mediated by parents; the control conditions included no treatment, treatment as usual, waiting list, alternative child-centred intervention not mediated by parents, or alternative parent-mediated intervention of hypothesised lesser effect than the experimental condition.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors (HM and IPO) independently screened articles identified in the search and decided which articles should be retrieved in full. For each included study, two review authors (IPO and EH) extracted and recorded data, using a piloted data collection form. Two review authors (IPO and HM) assessed the risk of bias in each study. We performed data synthesis and analysis using The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.1 software.

Main results

The review includes 17 studies from six countries (USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Thailand and China), which recruited 919 children with ASD. Not all 17 studies could be compared directly or combined in meta-analyses due to differences in the theoretica

患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的幼儿在沟通和社会互动方面存在障碍,并且经常表现出重复或不服从的行为。这种早期的困难模式对父母来说是一个挑战。因此,帮助父母制定互动和行为管理策略的方法是ASD早期干预的明显途径。这篇综述更新了2002年首次发表的Cochrane综述,但基于一个新的方案。目的评价父母干预对ASD患儿及其父母的益处,并探讨可能影响治疗效果的调节因子。我们于2012年8月检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和ERIC等一系列心理学、教育和生物医学数据库。由于这是对先前审查的更新,我们将搜索限制在2002年原始搜索之后的时期。检索重点文章的参考书目和参考文献,联系领域专家,手工检索重点期刊。我们只纳入了ASD儿童早期干预的随机对照试验。实验条件下的干预主要由家长介导;对照条件包括不治疗、照常治疗、等候名单、未由父母调解的以儿童为中心的替代干预,或假设效果小于实验条件的父母调解的替代干预。两位综述作者(HM和IPO)独立筛选检索到的文章,并决定哪些文章应该全文检索。对于每一项纳入的研究,两位综述作者(IPO和EH)使用试点数据收集表格提取和记录数据。两位综述作者(IPO和HM)评估了每项研究的偏倚风险。我们使用Cochrane Collaboration的Review Manager 5.1软件进行数据合成和分析。本综述包括来自6个国家(美国、英国、澳大利亚、加拿大、泰国和中国)的17项研究,共招募了919名自闭症儿童。由于支持干预措施的理论基础、干预措施的持续时间和强度以及所使用的结果测量工具的差异,并非所有17项研究都可以直接比较或合并在荟萃分析中。10项研究的子集数据被纳入meta分析,这些研究评估了干预措施以增强父母的互动方式,从而促进儿童的沟通。最大的荟萃分析包括6项研究的316名参与者的数据,最小的荟萃分析包括2项研究的55名参与者的数据。其余7项研究的结果以叙述性方式报道。在与分配隐藏和结果数据不完整相关的研究中,明显存在高偏倚风险;参与者的盲法是不可能的。总体而言,我们在评估的大多数主要结果(语言和沟通的大多数方面-无论是直接评估还是报告;观察到的亲子互动中儿童发起活动的频率;儿童适应行为;父母的压力),研究结果在很大程度上是不确定和不一致的。然而,亲子互动模式发生积极变化的证据是强有力的,且具有统计学意义(共同注意:标准化平均差异(SMD) 0.41;95%置信区间(CI) 0.14 ~ 0.68, P值&lt;0.05;父同步:SMD 0.90;95% CI 0.56 ~ 1.23, P值&lt;0.05)。此外,父母报告的一些证据表明,儿童的语言理解能力有所提高(词汇理解:平均差异(MD 36.26;95% CI 1.31 ~ 71.20, P值&lt;0.05)。此外,有证据表明儿童自闭症特征的严重程度降低(SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.52 ~ -0.08, P值&lt;0.05)。然而,父母干预导致儿童技能和困难发生变化的证据是不确定的,效应量小,ci宽,结论可能会随着未来高质量随机对照试验的发表而改变。 作者的结论本综述发现了一些证据表明父母介导的干预措施是有效的,尤其是在亲子互动的近端指标,但也在儿童语言理解和自闭症严重程度降低的远端指标。这些干预措施是否能减轻父母压力的证据尚无定论。这篇综述强调了关注早期干预服务模式的必要性,这种模式使父母能够熟练地为自闭症儿童的治疗做出贡献。然而,支持父母调解干预的从业者需要监测父母的压力水平。由于目前证据的质量较低,研究人员采用一套共同的结果测量方法可以提高从研究中得出结论的能力。自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)影响超过1%的儿童,通常在三岁前的行为中表现明显。患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童不了解如何与他人互动,可能没有发展语言或理解他人的交流,可能坚持常规和重复的行为。这种早期的困难模式对父母来说是一个挑战。因此,帮助家长制定互动和行为管理策略是早期干预的明显途径。目前的回顾回顾了2003年发表的一篇文章,其中只发现了两项设计良好的研究。本综述基于一项新协议,包括17项随机对照试验,其中大多数自2010年以来发表,其中父母提供的干预措施与没有治疗或当地服务,或以儿童为中心的替代干预措施(如托儿所看护)或另一种父母提供的干预措施在某种程度上不同于主要情况进行了比较。我们能够结合结果信息,从而增加对结果的信心。所有的研究都是根据证据的质量进行评级的,然后在判断得出结论的可靠性时将证据的质量考虑在内。这些研究在父母接受培训的内容以及父母与专业人士接触的时间长短方面各不相同。家长们要么单独与孩子一起接受培训,要么与其他家长一起接受培训。在大多数研究中,干预措施旨在帮助父母在与孩子互动时更加观察和反应,以帮助孩子发展沟通技巧。总之,调查发现有足够的证据表明,父母与孩子互动的方式确实按照预期发生了变化。该报告还指出,由于父母的干预,儿童的成绩有所改善,比如对语言的理解和自闭症特征的严重程度。然而,重要的结果,如儿童语言的其他方面,儿童的适应技能和父母的压力没有显示出变化。对于任何结果的证据还不充分,研究人员以同样的方式衡量效果将会受益。
{"title":"Parent-mediated early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)","authors":"Inalegwu P Oono,&nbsp;Emma J Honey,&nbsp;Helen McConachie","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1952","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1952","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have impairments in the areas of communication and social interaction and often display repetitive or non-compliant behaviour. This early pattern of difficulties is a challenge for parents. Therefore, approaches that help parents develop strategies for interaction and management of behaviour are an obvious route for early intervention in ASD. This review updates a Cochrane review first published in 2002 but is based on a new protocol.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the effectiveness of parent-mediated early interventions in terms of the benefits for both children with ASD and their parents and to explore some potential moderators of treatment effect.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched a range of psychological, educational and biomedical databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and ERIC in August 2012. As this is an update of a previous review, we limited the search to the period following the original searches in 2002. Bibliographies and reference lists of key articles were searched, field experts were contacted and key journals were handsearched.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included only randomised controlled trials of early intervention for children with ASD. The interventions in the experimental condition were mediated by parents; the control conditions included no treatment, treatment as usual, waiting list, alternative child-centred intervention not mediated by parents, or alternative parent-mediated intervention of hypothesised lesser effect than the experimental condition.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two review authors (HM and IPO) independently screened articles identified in the search and decided which articles should be retrieved in full. For each included study, two review authors (IPO and EH) extracted and recorded data, using a piloted data collection form. Two review authors (IPO and HM) assessed the risk of bias in each study. We performed data synthesis and analysis using The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.1 software.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The review includes 17 studies from six countries (USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Thailand and China), which recruited 919 children with ASD. Not all 17 studies could be compared directly or combined in meta-analyses due to differences in the theoretica","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1952","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137867983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cochrane in context: Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children 科克伦:儿童麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗
Pub Date : 2013-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1949
Vittorio Demicheli, Alessandro Rivetti, Maria Grazia Debalini, Carlo Di Pietrantonj, Joan Robinson

Cochrane Review: Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004407. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3

This companion piece to the review, “Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children,” contains the following pieces:

Cochrane综述:儿童麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj c。Cochrane数据库系统评价,2012年第2期。艺术。不。: CD004407。cd004407 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。这篇评论的配套文章“儿童麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗”包含以下文章:
{"title":"Cochrane in context: Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children","authors":"Vittorio Demicheli,&nbsp;Alessandro Rivetti,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Debalini,&nbsp;Carlo Di Pietrantonj,&nbsp;Joan Robinson","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1949","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1949","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cochrane Review: Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children</b> Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C. Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004407. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3</p><p>This companion piece to the review, “Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children,” contains the following pieces:\u0000\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1949","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84265384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 281
Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children 降低儿童呼吸道合胞病毒感染风险的单克隆抗体
Pub Date : 2013-11-20 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1950
Tea Andabaka, Jason W Nickerson, Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes, Juan David Rueda, Vesna Bacic Vrca, Bruno Barsic

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most important viral pathogens causing acute respiratory infections, resulting in about 3.4 million hospitalisations annually in children under five. Palivizumab is the only product approved for prevention of serious RSV disease, as motavizumab is no longer being developed for this condition. The efficacy and safety of palivizumab has been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a large number of economic evaluations (EEs) have tested its cost-effectiveness.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness and safety of palivizumab prophylaxis in reducing the risk of complications (hospitalization due to RSV infection) in high-risk infants and children. To assess the cost-effectiveness (or cost-utility) of palivizumab prophylaxis in infants and children in different risk groups.

Search methods

We searched CENTRAL (2012, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1996 to July week 4, 2012), EMBASE (1996 to August 2012), CINAHL (1996 to August 2012) and LILACS (1996 to August 2012) for RCTs. We searched the NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NHS EED 2012, Issue 4), Health Economics Evaluations Database (HEED, 9 August 2012), Paediatric Economic Database Evaluations (PEDE, 1980 to 2009), MEDLINE (1996 to July week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (1996 to August 2012) for EEs.

Selection criteria

We included RCTs comparing palivizumab prophylaxis with a placebo or another type of prophylaxis in preventing serious lower respiratory tract disease caused by RSV in paediatric patients at high risk. We included cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-utility analyses comparing palivizumab prophylaxis with no prophylaxis.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for the included studies and extracted data for both the RCTs and EEs. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and for adverse events (AEs). For continuous outcomes, we provided a narrative summary of results due to missing data on standard deviations. We performed fixed-effect meta-analyses for the estimation of pooled effects whenever there was no indication of heterogeneity between included RCTs.

We summarised the results reported in included EEs, such as incremental costs, incremental effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness and/or cost-utility ratio

帕利珠单抗预防的经济评估结果在不同的研究中是不一致的,从高成本效益到不成本效益不等,这意味着必须谨慎解释经济结果。低成本帕利珠单抗的可用性将减少其不公平分配,从而使儿童面临最大风险的最贫穷国家能够获得RSV预防。帕利珠单抗用于降低儿童严重RSV感染的风险呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染是儿童急性呼吸道感染的主要原因。呼吸道合胞病毒感染可导致儿童发病和死亡,导致住院、住进重症监护病房、需要接受强化治疗和死亡。大多数受感染的儿童几乎没有什么后果。然而,有其他严重健康问题的儿童患呼吸道合胞病毒感染并发症的风险更高。本综述检查了使用被动免疫-帕利珠单抗-来预防和改变这些儿童RSV感染的严重程度,并确定它是否具有成本效益。本综述的结果基于7项研究(均由药物制造公司赞助)的数据,涉及11096名参与者,报告了帕利珠单抗的有效性和安全性,以及34项研究报告了其成本效益。我们的研究结果表明,与安慰剂相比,在获得严重RSV感染风险较高的儿童中,预防性使用帕利珠单抗具有良好的效果。与接受安慰剂治疗的儿童相比,接受帕利珠单抗治疗的儿童住院次数更少,住院天数更短,住进重症监护病房的次数更少,接受氧气治疗的天数更短。考虑到这些婴儿和儿童的潜在健康问题,不良事件的高发生率是完全可以预料的。我们的研究结果显示,接受帕利珠单抗治疗的儿童出现不良事件的频率与接受安慰剂治疗的儿童相似。帕利珠单抗在减少住院率方面被证明是有效的,但它是否具有成本效益还不容易确定。这篇综述发现,不同研究的成本效益结果存在很大差异。由于该药物的高成本,在许多国家,帕利珠单抗预防可能无法作为标准治疗。
{"title":"Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children","authors":"Tea Andabaka,&nbsp;Jason W Nickerson,&nbsp;Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes,&nbsp;Juan David Rueda,&nbsp;Vesna Bacic Vrca,&nbsp;Bruno Barsic","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1950","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most important viral pathogens causing acute respiratory infections, resulting in about 3.4 million hospitalisations annually in children under five. Palivizumab is the only product approved for prevention of serious RSV disease, as motavizumab is no longer being developed for this condition. The efficacy and safety of palivizumab has been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a large number of economic evaluations (EEs) have tested its cost-effectiveness.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of palivizumab prophylaxis in reducing the risk of complications (hospitalization due to RSV infection) in high-risk infants and children. To assess the cost-effectiveness (or cost-utility) of palivizumab prophylaxis in infants and children in different risk groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched CENTRAL (2012, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1996 to July week 4, 2012), EMBASE (1996 to August 2012), CINAHL (1996 to August 2012) and LILACS (1996 to August 2012) for RCTs. We searched the NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NHS EED 2012, Issue 4), Health Economics Evaluations Database (HEED, 9 August 2012), Paediatric Economic Database Evaluations (PEDE, 1980 to 2009), MEDLINE (1996 to July week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (1996 to August 2012) for EEs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included RCTs comparing palivizumab prophylaxis with a placebo or another type of prophylaxis in preventing serious lower respiratory tract disease caused by RSV in paediatric patients at high risk. We included cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-utility analyses comparing palivizumab prophylaxis with no prophylaxis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias for the included studies and extracted data for both the RCTs and EEs. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and for adverse events (AEs). For continuous outcomes, we provided a narrative summary of results due to missing data on standard deviations. We performed fixed-effect meta-analyses for the estimation of pooled effects whenever there was no indication of heterogeneity between included RCTs.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We summarised the results reported in included EEs, such as incremental costs, incremental effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness and/or cost-utility ratio","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1950","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137946389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
What does the recent literature add to the identification and investigation of fractures in child abuse: an overview of review updates 2005–2013 最近的文献对儿童虐待中骨折的识别和调查有什么补充:2005-2013年综述更新
Pub Date : 2013-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1941
Sabine Maguire, Laura Cowley, Mala Mann, Alison Kemp

Background:

Fractures are a manifestation of physical abuse and common accidental injuries. Distinguishing which fractures are indicative of abuse and optimizing the identification of occult fractures are the challenges.

Objectives:

To identify additional studies published since our original systematic reviews to address these two issues.

Methods:

An all-language literature search of 14 databases was conducted for the years 2005–2013, using revised keywords. All studies underwent standardized critical appraisal by two independent reviewers, applying quality criteria relating to the confirmation of child abuse, exclusion of abuse and quality of skeletal survey conducted. A meta-analysis, stratified by age, was conducted to determine the predictive value for abuse of specific fractures by fitting a random effects model.

Results:

Twenty-three studies addressed ‘radiological investigations’, and nine studies ‘fractures indicative of abuse’. Radiological studies reiterated that a single investigation (skeletal survey or radionuclide imaging ) will miss some abusive fractures; in 8.4–37.6% of children, the repeat skeletal survey added new information that influenced the child protection procedures. Debate continues as to the optimal images to include in the repeat skeletal survey. A meta-analysis of femoral and humeral fractures by age highlighted that children younger than 18 months are significantly more likely to have sustained their fracture as a consequence of abuse, than those aged 1–4 years.

Authors' Conclusions:

Recent literature validates the original conclusions that repeat skeletal imaging adds important information on fractures. Comparative studies of femoral, humeral, rib and skull fractures enabled a meta-analysis by age, however further comparative studies are needed.

背景:骨折是身体虐待和常见的意外伤害的表现。区分哪些骨折是滥用的迹象,并优化隐匿性骨折的识别是一个挑战。目的:确定自我们最初的系统综述以来发表的其他研究来解决这两个问题。方法:使用修订后的关键词检索2005-2013年14个数据库的全语言文献。所有研究都由两名独立的审稿人进行标准化的严格评价,采用与确认虐待儿童、排除虐待和所进行的骨骼调查质量有关的质量标准。通过拟合随机效应模型,进行了按年龄分层的meta分析,以确定滥用特定骨折的预测价值。结果:23项研究涉及“放射学调查”,9项研究涉及“骨折表明虐待”。放射学研究重申,单一的调查(骨骼调查或放射性核素成像)将错过一些滥用骨折;在8.4-37.6%的儿童中,重复骨骼调查增加了影响儿童保护程序的新信息。关于重复骨骼调查中包含的最佳图像的争论仍在继续。一项按年龄划分的股骨和肱骨骨折荟萃分析强调,18个月以下的儿童比1-4岁的儿童更有可能因虐待而持续骨折。作者的结论:最近的文献证实了原来的结论,即重复骨骼成像增加了骨折的重要信息。股骨、肱骨、肋骨和颅骨骨折的比较研究可以按年龄进行荟萃分析,但需要进一步的比较研究。
{"title":"What does the recent literature add to the identification and investigation of fractures in child abuse: an overview of review updates 2005–2013","authors":"Sabine Maguire,&nbsp;Laura Cowley,&nbsp;Mala Mann,&nbsp;Alison Kemp","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1941","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1941","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background:</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fractures are a manifestation of physical abuse and common accidental injuries. Distinguishing which fractures are indicative of abuse and optimizing the identification of occult fractures are the challenges.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives:</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To identify additional studies published since our original systematic reviews to address these two issues.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods:</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An all-language literature search of 14 databases was conducted for the years 2005–2013, using revised keywords. All studies underwent standardized critical appraisal by two independent reviewers, applying quality criteria relating to the confirmation of child abuse, exclusion of abuse and quality of skeletal survey conducted. A meta-analysis, stratified by age, was conducted to determine the predictive value for abuse of specific fractures by fitting a random effects model.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results:</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-three studies addressed ‘radiological investigations’, and nine studies ‘fractures indicative of abuse’. Radiological studies reiterated that a single investigation (skeletal survey or radionuclide imaging ) will miss some abusive fractures; in 8.4–37.6% of children, the repeat skeletal survey added new information that influenced the child protection procedures. Debate continues as to the optimal images to include in the repeat skeletal survey. A meta-analysis of femoral and humeral fractures by age highlighted that children younger than 18 months are significantly more likely to have sustained their fracture as a consequence of abuse, than those aged 1–4 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Authors' Conclusions:</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Recent literature validates the original conclusions that repeat skeletal imaging adds important information on fractures. Comparative studies of femoral, humeral, rib and skull fractures enabled a meta-analysis by age, however further comparative studies are needed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1941","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74464305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
School-based programmes for preventing smoking 以学校为本的预防吸烟计划
Pub Date : 2013-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1937
Roger E. Thomas, Julie McLellan, Rafael Perera

Background

Helping young people to avoid starting smoking is a widely endorsed public health goal, and schools provide a route to communicate with nearly all young people. School-based interventions have been delivered for close to 40 years.

Objectives

The primary aim of this review was to determine whether school smoking interventions prevent youth from starting smoking. Our secondary objective was to determine which interventions were most effective. This included evaluating the effects of theoretical approaches; additional booster sessions; programme deliverers; gender effects; and multifocal interventions versus those focused solely on smoking.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsyclNFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Health Star, and Dissertation Abstracts for terms relating to school-based smoking cessation programmes. In addition, we screened the bibliographies of articles and ran individual MEDLINE searches for 133 authors who had undertaken randomised controlled trials in this area. The most recent searches were conducted in October 2012.

Selection criteria

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where students, classes, schools, or school districts were randomised to intervention arm(s) versus a control group, and followed for at least six months. Participants had to be youth (aged 5 to 18). Interventions could be any curricula used in a school setting to deter tobacco use, and outcome measures could be never smoking, frequency of smoking, number of cigarettes smoked, or smoking indices.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Based on the type of outcome, we placed studies into three groups for analysis: Pure Prevention cohorts (Group 1), Change in Smoking Behaviour over time (Group 2) and Point Prevalence of Smoking (Group 3).

Main results

One hundred and thirty-four studies involving 428,293 participants met the inclusion criteria. Some studies provided data for more than one group.

Pure Prevention cohorts (Group 1) included 49 studies (N = 142,447). Pooled results at follow-up at one year or less foun

帮助年轻人避免开始吸烟是一个广泛认可的公共卫生目标,学校提供了与几乎所有年轻人沟通的途径。以学校为基础的干预措施已经实施了近40年。本综述的主要目的是确定学校吸烟干预是否能防止青少年开始吸烟。我们的第二个目标是确定哪些干预措施最有效。这包括评估理论方法的效果;额外的加强会议;计划此列;性别的影响;多焦点干预和只关注吸烟的干预。检索方法我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册表(Central)、Cochrane烟草成瘾组专业注册表、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsyclNFO、ERIC、CINAHL、Health Star和论文摘要,以获取与校本戒烟计划相关的术语。此外,我们筛选了文章的参考书目,并对在该领域进行过随机对照试验的133位作者进行了MEDLINE搜索。最近一次搜索是在2012年10月进行的。我们选择了随机对照试验(RCTs),其中学生、班级、学校或学区被随机分配到干预组与对照组,并随访至少6个月。参与者必须是年轻人(5至18岁)。干预措施可以是在学校设置中使用的任何旨在阻止烟草使用的课程,结果措施可以是从不吸烟、吸烟频率、吸烟数量或吸烟指数。数据收集和分析两名评论者独立评估研究纳入、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。根据结果的类型,我们将研究分为三组进行分析:纯预防队列(第1组),吸烟行为随时间的变化(第2组)和吸烟的点患病率(第3组)。主要结果134项研究涉及428,293名参与者符合纳入标准。一些研究提供了不止一组的数据。纯预防队列(组1)包括49项研究(N = 142,447)。随访一年或更短时间的综合结果发现,干预课程与对照组相比没有总体效果(优势比(or) 0.94, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.85至1.05)。在亚组分析中,结合社会能力和社会影响课程(6个随机对照试验)显示,在预防吸烟方面有统计学意义的显著效果(OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 ~ 0.87;七武器);而在仅涉及信息的方案中未发现显著影响(OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.00至14.87;一项研究),仅受社会影响(OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.88 - 1.13;25项研究)或多模式干预(or 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 - 1.08;五个研究)。相比之下,最长随访的汇总结果显示,总体上显著的干预效果(OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82至0.96)。亚组分析发现,社会能力课程(OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30至0.88)和社会能力与社会影响相结合的课程(OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28至0.87)有显著效果,但仅信息课程、仅社会影响课程和多模式课程没有显著效果。吸烟行为随时间的变化(第二组)包括15项研究(N = 45,555)。在一年或更短的时间内,有一个小的但具有统计学意义的效应有利于对照组(标准化平均差异(SMD) 0.04, 95% CI 0.02至0.06)。随访时间超过1年,无统计学意义(SMD为0.02,95% CI为-0.00 ~ 0.02)。25项研究报告了吸烟点患病率(第3组)的数据,尽管该组的异质性太高,无法汇总数据。我们无法分析49项研究(N = 152,544)的数据。亚组分析(仅纯预防队列)表明,在所有课程的最长随访中,对成人演讲者有显著影响(OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81至0.96)。仅烟草干预和多焦点干预之间没有差异。对于有强化课程的课程,只有在随访1年或更短时间(or 0.50, 95% CI 0.26至0.96)和最长随访时间(or 0.51, 95% CI 0.27至0.96)的社会能力和社会影响联合干预措施才有显著效果。 关于性别差异的有限数据表明没有整体效果,尽管一项研究发现多模式干预在一年内对男学生有效果。对纯预防队列和吸烟行为随时间变化结果的敏感性分析表明,选择和消耗偏差都不影响结果。作者的结论是,在长期随访中,纯预防组显示出显著的效果,与对照组相比,开始吸烟的人数平均减少了12%。然而,在一年或更短的时间内,没有发现总体效果。社会能力和社会影响相结合的干预在一年和最长的随访中显示出显著的效果。实施社会影响方案的研究显示,在任何时间点都没有产生总体效果;多模式干预和仅采用信息方法的干预同样无效。报告吸烟行为随时间变化的研究没有显示出总体效果,但在干预水平上,对社会能力和社会能力与社会影响相结合的干预有积极的发现。在学校实施的规划能防止年轻人开始吸烟吗?在发展中国家和较贫穷的国家,越来越多的年轻人吸烟。在过去的40年里,已经在学校实施了防止他们开始吸烟的规划。我们想知道它们是否有效。我们确定了49项随机对照试验(超过140,000名学龄儿童)的干预措施,旨在防止从未吸烟的儿童成为吸烟者。在超过一年的时间里,干预措施在防止年轻人开始吸烟方面有显著的效果。研究发现,采用社会能力方法的方案以及将社会能力与社会影响方法结合起来的方案比其他方案更有效。然而,在一年或更短的时间内,除了一些教育年轻人具备社会能力和抵制社会影响的方案外,没有任何总体效果。一组较小的试验报告了班上所有人的吸烟状况,无论他们在研究开始时是否吸烟。在这些随访一年或更短时间的试验中,总体上较小但显著的效果有利于对照组。这种情况持续了一年;在随访时间超过一年的试验中,干预组的人比对照组的人吸烟更多。当随机化的低偏倚风险试验或失去参与者的低偏倚风险试验被单独检查时,结论保持不变。由成年人领导的项目可能比由年轻人领导的项目更有效。没有证据表明提供额外的治疗会使干预更有效。
{"title":"School-based programmes for preventing smoking","authors":"Roger E. Thomas,&nbsp;Julie McLellan,&nbsp;Rafael Perera","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1937","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1937","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Helping young people to avoid starting smoking is a widely endorsed public health goal, and schools provide a route to communicate with nearly all young people. School-based interventions have been delivered for close to 40 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The primary aim of this review was to determine whether school smoking interventions prevent youth from starting smoking. Our secondary objective was to determine which interventions were most effective. This included evaluating the effects of theoretical approaches; additional booster sessions; programme deliverers; gender effects; and multifocal interventions versus those focused solely on smoking.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsyclNFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Health Star, and Dissertation Abstracts for terms relating to school-based smoking cessation programmes. In addition, we screened the bibliographies of articles and ran individual MEDLINE searches for 133 authors who had undertaken randomised controlled trials in this area. The most recent searches were conducted in October 2012.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where students, classes, schools, or school districts were randomised to intervention arm(s) versus a control group, and followed for at least six months. Participants had to be youth (aged 5 to 18). Interventions could be any curricula used in a school setting to deter tobacco use, and outcome measures could be never smoking, frequency of smoking, number of cigarettes smoked, or smoking indices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Based on the type of outcome, we placed studies into three groups for analysis: Pure Prevention cohorts (Group 1), Change in Smoking Behaviour over time (Group 2) and Point Prevalence of Smoking (Group 3).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One hundred and thirty-four studies involving 428,293 participants met the inclusion criteria. Some studies provided data for more than one group.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pure Prevention cohorts (Group 1) included 49 studies (N = 142,447). Pooled results at follow-up at one year or less foun","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1937","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81506928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 402
Cochrane in context: School-based programmes for preventing smoking 科克伦:基于学校的预防吸烟计划
Pub Date : 2013-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1938
Roger E. Thomas, Julie McLennan, Rafael Perera

Cochrane Review: School-based programmes for preventing smoking Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001293. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.

This companion piece to the review, “School/based programmes for preventing smoking,” contains the following pieces:

Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R.基于学校的预防吸烟计划。Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013,第4期。艺术。不。: CD001293。cd001293.pub3 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。这篇综述的配套文章“学校/以学校为基础的预防吸烟计划”包含以下内容:
{"title":"Cochrane in context: School-based programmes for preventing smoking","authors":"Roger E. Thomas,&nbsp;Julie McLennan,&nbsp;Rafael Perera","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1938","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1938","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cochrane Review: School-based programmes for preventing smoking</b> Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001293. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.</p><p>This companion piece to the review, “School/based programmes for preventing smoking,” contains the following pieces:\u0000\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1938","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78187166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Cochrane in context: Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest 儿童心肺骤停后低温对神经保护的作用
Pub Date : 2013-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1940
Barnaby R. Scholefield

Cochrane Review: Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest Scholefield B, Duncan H, Davies P, Gao Smith F, Khan K, Perkins GD, Morris K. Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD009442. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009442.pub2

This companion piece to the review, “Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest,” contains the following pieces:

Editor's note on this review, by Ricardo Fernandes:

The Editorial Board's rationale for selecting this review was that this is a “classical” case of an important uncertainty in child health. There is a relatively strong rationale for this practice in adults but in pediatrics the underlying condition differs, so extrapolation is controversial. The authors highlight in the abstract that there are ongoing trials, and also mention nonrandomized evidence, all of which is helpful to the reader.

Scholefield B, Duncan H, Davies P, Gao Smith F, Khan K, Perkins GD, Morris K.低温对心肺骤停后儿童神经保护的作用。Cochrane数据库系统评价2013,第2期。艺术。不。: CD009442。cd009442 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。这篇综述的同伴文章“心肺骤停后儿童的低温神经保护”包含以下内容:编辑对这篇综述的注释,作者Ricardo Fernandes:编辑委员会选择这篇综述的理由是,这是一个儿童健康中重要的不确定因素的“经典”病例。这种做法在成人中有相对较强的理论依据,但在儿科中,潜在的情况不同,因此外推是有争议的。作者在摘要中强调了正在进行的试验,并提到了非随机证据,这些都对读者有帮助。
{"title":"Cochrane in context: Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest","authors":"Barnaby R. Scholefield","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1940","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cochrane Review: Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest</b> Scholefield B, Duncan H, Davies P, Gao Smith F, Khan K, Perkins GD, Morris K. Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD009442. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009442.pub2</p><p>This companion piece to the review, “Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest,” contains the following pieces:\u0000\u0000 </p><p>Editor's note on this review, by Ricardo Fernandes:</p><p><i>The Editorial Board's rationale for selecting this review was that this is a “classical” case of an important uncertainty in child health. There is a relatively strong rationale for this practice in adults but in pediatrics the underlying condition differs, so extrapolation is controversial. The authors highlight in the abstract that there are ongoing trials, and also mention nonrandomized evidence, all of which is helpful to the reader</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1940","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79701344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cochrane in context: Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under Cochrane上下文:游泳训练对18岁及以下儿童和青少年哮喘的影响
Pub Date : 2013-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1936
Sean Beggs, Julia A. E. Walters

Cochrane Review: Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under Beggs S, Foong YC, Le HCT, Noor D, Wood-Baker R, Walters JAE. Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD009607. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009607.pub2

This companion piece to the review, “Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under,” contains the following pieces:

Cochrane综述:游泳训练对18岁及以下儿童和青少年哮喘的影响Beggs S, Foong YC, Le HCT, Noor D, Wood-Baker R, Walters JAE。18岁及以下儿童和青少年哮喘的游泳训练。Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013,第4期。艺术。不。: CD009607。cd009607 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。这篇综述的配套文章“游泳训练对18岁及以下儿童和青少年哮喘的影响”包含以下文章:
{"title":"Cochrane in context: Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under","authors":"Sean Beggs,&nbsp;Julia A. E. Walters","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1936","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Cochrane Review: Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under</b> Beggs S, Foong YC, Le HCT, Noor D, Wood-Baker R, Walters JAE. Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD009607. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009607.pub2</p><p>This companion piece to the review, “Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under,” contains the following pieces:\u0000\u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1936","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137702793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibiotics for the common cold—do they work? 治疗普通感冒的抗生素管用吗?
Pub Date : 2013-09-18 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1933
Joan Robinson

Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.

生态儿科是《基于证据的儿童健康:Cochrane评论杂志》中偶尔出现的特色。我们的目标是促进世界范围内关于减少卫生保健浪费的讨论。在每一期中,我们将选择一篇最近的Cochrane综述,重点介绍一种仍在使用的做法,现有证据告诉我们应该停止这种做法。
{"title":"Antibiotics for the common cold—do they work?","authors":"Joan Robinson","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1933","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1933","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1933","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75768766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1