Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2389921
Mathilde Chevignard, Hugo Câmara-Costa, Georges Dellatolas
Introduction: Severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (spTBI), including abusive head trauma (AHT) in young children, is a major public health problem. Long-term consequences of spTBI include a large variety of physical, neurological, biological, cognitive, behavioral and social deficits and impairments.
Areas covered: The present narrative review summarizes studies and reviews published from January 2019 to February 2024 on spTBI. Significant papers published before 2019 were also included. The article gives coverage to the causes of spTBI, its epidemiology and fatality rates; disparities, inequalities, and socioeconomic factors; critical care; outcomes; and interventions.
Expert opinion: There are disparities between countries and according to socio-economic factors regarding causes, treatments and outcomes of spTBI. AHT has an overall poor outcome. Adherence to critical care guidelines is imperfect and the evidence-base of guidelines needs further investigations. Neuroimaging and biomarker predictors of outcomes is a rapidly evolving domain. Long-term cognitive, behavioral and psychosocial difficulties are the most prevalent and disabling. Their investigation should make a clear distinction between objective (clinical examination, cognitive tests, facts) and subjective measures (estimations using patient- and proxy-reported questionnaires), considering possible common source bias in reported difficulties. Family/caregiver-focused interventions, ecological approaches, and use of technology in delivery of interventions are recommended to improve long-term difficulties after spTBI.
{"title":"Predicting and improving outcome in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Mathilde Chevignard, Hugo Câmara-Costa, Georges Dellatolas","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2389921","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2389921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (spTBI), including abusive head trauma (AHT) in young children, is a major public health problem. Long-term consequences of spTBI include a large variety of physical, neurological, biological, cognitive, behavioral and social deficits and impairments.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The present narrative review summarizes studies and reviews published from January 2019 to February 2024 on spTBI. Significant papers published before 2019 were also included. The article gives coverage to the causes of spTBI, its epidemiology and fatality rates; disparities, inequalities, and socioeconomic factors; critical care; outcomes; and interventions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There are disparities between countries and according to socio-economic factors regarding causes, treatments and outcomes of spTBI. AHT has an overall poor outcome. Adherence to critical care guidelines is imperfect and the evidence-base of guidelines needs further investigations. Neuroimaging and biomarker predictors of outcomes is a rapidly evolving domain. Long-term cognitive, behavioral and psychosocial difficulties are the most prevalent and disabling. Their investigation should make a clear distinction between objective (clinical examination, cognitive tests, facts) and subjective measures (estimations using patient- and proxy-reported questionnaires), considering possible common source bias in reported difficulties. Family/caregiver-focused interventions, ecological approaches, and use of technology in delivery of interventions are recommended to improve long-term difficulties after spTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"963-983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141975454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2402058
Shreeya Thussu,Aniketh Naidu,Sindhu Manivannan,George T Grossberg
INTRODUCTIONAlzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia worldwide. Aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-beta, became the first disease-modifying treatment for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild AD dementia and suggested that removing amyloid from the brain, especially in early AD, might make a difference in slowing cognitive decline.AREAS COVEREDIn this review, the authors outline aducanumab's clinical efficacy as shown through key clinical trials and discuss its approval by the Food and Drug Administration under the accelerated pathway, which sparked both hope and controversy. We also discuss the importance of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities as a major side effect of aducanumab and all subsequent monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-beta.EXPERT OPINIONAducanumab, became the first monoclonal antibody that provided at least partial support for the amyloid hypothesis by demonstrating slowed cognitive decline by removing amyloid from the brain, although full FDA approval now seems unlikely due to discontinuation of its development. Its introduction raised awareness of ARIA, highlighted the significant costs and need for informed consent in treatment, and emphasized the importance of long-term, diverse, and combination therapy data for future AD treatments targeting amyloid and tau.
引言 阿尔茨海默病是全球最常见的痴呆症。阿杜单抗是一种靶向淀粉样蛋白-β的单克隆抗体,它是治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)引起的轻度认知障碍和轻度 AD 痴呆症的第一种疾病改变疗法,并表明清除大脑中的淀粉样蛋白,尤其是在 AD 早期,可能会在减缓认知功能衰退方面有所作为。在这篇综述中,作者概述了关键临床试验所显示的阿杜卡单抗的临床疗效,并讨论了美国食品药品管理局在加速途径下批准阿杜卡单抗的情况,这引发了人们的希望和争议。我们还讨论了淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常作为阿杜单抗及随后所有靶向淀粉样蛋白-β的单克隆抗体的主要副作用的重要性。专家观点阿杜单抗是首个至少部分支持淀粉样蛋白假说的单克隆抗体,它通过清除大脑中的淀粉样蛋白减缓了认知功能的衰退,尽管由于其研发中止,美国食品药品管理局现在似乎不可能完全批准它。它的问世提高了人们对ARIA的认识,强调了治疗中的巨大成本和知情同意的必要性,并强调了长期、多样化和联合治疗数据对未来针对淀粉样蛋白和tau的AD治疗的重要性。
{"title":"Profiling aducanumab as a treatment option for alzheimer's disease: an overview of efficacy, safety and tolerability.","authors":"Shreeya Thussu,Aniketh Naidu,Sindhu Manivannan,George T Grossberg","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2402058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2402058","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONAlzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia worldwide. Aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-beta, became the first disease-modifying treatment for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild AD dementia and suggested that removing amyloid from the brain, especially in early AD, might make a difference in slowing cognitive decline.AREAS COVEREDIn this review, the authors outline aducanumab's clinical efficacy as shown through key clinical trials and discuss its approval by the Food and Drug Administration under the accelerated pathway, which sparked both hope and controversy. We also discuss the importance of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities as a major side effect of aducanumab and all subsequent monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-beta.EXPERT OPINIONAducanumab, became the first monoclonal antibody that provided at least partial support for the amyloid hypothesis by demonstrating slowed cognitive decline by removing amyloid from the brain, although full FDA approval now seems unlikely due to discontinuation of its development. Its introduction raised awareness of ARIA, highlighted the significant costs and need for informed consent in treatment, and emphasized the importance of long-term, diverse, and combination therapy data for future AD treatments targeting amyloid and tau.","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":"402 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2401558
William David Wells-Gatnik,Lanfranco Pellesi,Paolo Martelletti
INTRODUCTIONRimegepant and atogepant, two innovative oral medications for the treatment of migraine, are gaining prominence in the treatment of migraine. However, outside of specialist headache centers, these novel medications remain subjectively underutilized. While multiple rationales exist describing their underutilization, a leading factor is the complexity and clinical flexibility attributed to the individual members of the gepant medication class.AREAS COVEREDThis review provides a brief review of the current uses, common adverse events, and potential areas of future clinical innovation attributed to rimegepant and atogepant. A database search for the term 'Rimegepant OR Atogepant' was completed, yielding 240 individual results. Following multiple rounds of assessment that aimed to determine relevance of each individual result, 42 studies were included in the synthesis of this review.EXPERT OPINIONRimegepant and atogepant are exciting medications that demonstrate significant clinical innovation within the field of migraine therapy. While current indications are clear, data is lacking regarding the future expanded roles of these medications. Current areas of potential therapeutic innovation for rimegepant and atogepant include the pediatric population, in pregnancy and breastfeeding, in cluster headache and post-traumatic headache, and in patients that previously discontinued calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy.
{"title":"Rimegepant and atogepant: novel drugs providing innovative opportunities in the management of migraine.","authors":"William David Wells-Gatnik,Lanfranco Pellesi,Paolo Martelletti","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2401558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2401558","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONRimegepant and atogepant, two innovative oral medications for the treatment of migraine, are gaining prominence in the treatment of migraine. However, outside of specialist headache centers, these novel medications remain subjectively underutilized. While multiple rationales exist describing their underutilization, a leading factor is the complexity and clinical flexibility attributed to the individual members of the gepant medication class.AREAS COVEREDThis review provides a brief review of the current uses, common adverse events, and potential areas of future clinical innovation attributed to rimegepant and atogepant. A database search for the term 'Rimegepant OR Atogepant' was completed, yielding 240 individual results. Following multiple rounds of assessment that aimed to determine relevance of each individual result, 42 studies were included in the synthesis of this review.EXPERT OPINIONRimegepant and atogepant are exciting medications that demonstrate significant clinical innovation within the field of migraine therapy. While current indications are clear, data is lacking regarding the future expanded roles of these medications. Current areas of potential therapeutic innovation for rimegepant and atogepant include the pediatric population, in pregnancy and breastfeeding, in cluster headache and post-traumatic headache, and in patients that previously discontinued calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy.","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2400682
Federico Cocconi,Nicola Maffulli,Andreas Bell,Michael Kurt Memminger,Francesco Simeone,Filippo Migliorini
INTRODUCTIONSpinal and non-spinal pathologies can cause low back pain. Non-spinal sources of low back pain include the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the hip. SIJ pain can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Current strategies for managing sacroiliac joint pain are debated, and limited evidence exists.AREAS COVEREDThe present expert opinion updates current evidence on conservative and surgical modalities for SIJ pain.EXPERT OPINIONSurgical management for SIJ pain is effective. However, it exposes patients to surgery and, therefore, related complications. Conservative management may be implemented in patients with moderate SIJ pain, with less than six months of symptoms, or not eligible for surgery. Several noninvasive modalities are available, mostly centered on intra-articular injections. Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells have only midterm lasting effects, at most for nine months. Radiofrequency ablation is another methodology for pain relief. Both continuous and pulsatile radiofrequency ablation are associated with good outcomes. SIJ fusion can be performed using different techniques; however, a clear recommendation on the most appropriate modality for the management of SIJ pain is still debated.
{"title":"Sacroiliac joint pain: what treatment and when.","authors":"Federico Cocconi,Nicola Maffulli,Andreas Bell,Michael Kurt Memminger,Francesco Simeone,Filippo Migliorini","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2400682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2400682","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONSpinal and non-spinal pathologies can cause low back pain. Non-spinal sources of low back pain include the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the hip. SIJ pain can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Current strategies for managing sacroiliac joint pain are debated, and limited evidence exists.AREAS COVEREDThe present expert opinion updates current evidence on conservative and surgical modalities for SIJ pain.EXPERT OPINIONSurgical management for SIJ pain is effective. However, it exposes patients to surgery and, therefore, related complications. Conservative management may be implemented in patients with moderate SIJ pain, with less than six months of symptoms, or not eligible for surgery. Several noninvasive modalities are available, mostly centered on intra-articular injections. Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells have only midterm lasting effects, at most for nine months. Radiofrequency ablation is another methodology for pain relief. Both continuous and pulsatile radiofrequency ablation are associated with good outcomes. SIJ fusion can be performed using different techniques; however, a clear recommendation on the most appropriate modality for the management of SIJ pain is still debated.","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2401556
Franklin R Schneier
{"title":"When is pharmacological intervention recommended for adults with social anxiety disorder?","authors":"Franklin R Schneier","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2401556","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2401556","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":"56 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2379413
Claudio Piqueras-Sanchez, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Jorge Moreno-Fernandez, Eva Soler-Espejo, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Vanessa Roldán, Francisco Marín
Introduction: With the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it entails expanding oral anticoagulants (OACs) use, carrying a higher risk of associated hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Despite advances in OACs development with a better safety profile and reversal agent for these anticoagulants, there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with OACs-associated ICH.
Areas covered: In this review, the authors have carried out an exhaustive search on the advances in recent years. The authors provide an update on the management of ICH in anticoagulated patients, as well as an update on the latest evidence on anticoagulation resumption, recent therapeutic strategies, and investigational drugs that could play a role in the future.
Expert opinion: Following an ICH event in an anticoagulated patient, a comprehensive clinical evaluation is imperative. Anticoagulation should be promptly withdrawn and reversed. Once the patient is stabilized, a reintroduction of anticoagulation should be considered, typically within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks, if feasible. If re-anticoagulation is not possible, alternative options such as Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion are available.
导言:随着心房颤动(房颤)发病率的增加,口服抗凝药(OACs)的使用范围也随之扩大,导致相关出血性事件(包括颅内出血(ICH))的风险也随之升高。尽管口服抗凝药的研发取得了进展,安全性和逆转剂也得到了改善,但对于口服抗凝药相关 ICH 患者的最佳治疗方法仍未达成共识:在这篇综述中,作者对近年来的进展进行了详尽的研究。作者提供了有关抗凝患者 ICH 治疗的最新情况,以及有关恢复抗凝的最新证据、最新治疗策略和未来可能发挥作用的研究药物的最新情况:抗凝患者发生 ICH 事件后,必须进行全面的临床评估。应立即撤消和撤销抗凝治疗。患者病情稳定后,如果可行,应考虑在 4-8 周内重新开始抗凝治疗。如果无法重新进行抗凝治疗,也可以选择其他方法,如左心房阑尾闭塞术。
{"title":"Advances in the medical treatment and diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulation.","authors":"Claudio Piqueras-Sanchez, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Jorge Moreno-Fernandez, Eva Soler-Espejo, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Vanessa Roldán, Francisco Marín","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2379413","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2379413","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it entails expanding oral anticoagulants (OACs) use, carrying a higher risk of associated hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Despite advances in OACs development with a better safety profile and reversal agent for these anticoagulants, there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with OACs-associated ICH.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, the authors have carried out an exhaustive search on the advances in recent years. The authors provide an update on the management of ICH in anticoagulated patients, as well as an update on the latest evidence on anticoagulation resumption, recent therapeutic strategies, and investigational drugs that could play a role in the future.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Following an ICH event in an anticoagulated patient, a comprehensive clinical evaluation is imperative. Anticoagulation should be promptly withdrawn and reversed. Once the patient is stabilized, a reintroduction of anticoagulation should be considered, typically within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks, if feasible. If re-anticoagulation is not possible, alternative options such as Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"913-928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-16DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2367016
Artur Menegaz de Almeida, Marianna Leite, Lucca Moreira Lopes, Pedro Gomes Lima, Maria Luísa Siegloch Barros, Samuel Rocha Pinheiro, Ítalo Andrade, Patrícia Viana, Victória Morbach, Gabriel Marinheiro, Ricardo de Oliveira, Agostinho C Pinheiro
Introduction: Gantenerumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid β protein (Aβ) in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). The authors sought to evaluate gantenerumab safety and efficacy in early AD patients.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until 2 December 2023. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression analysis was conducted to evaluate a possible link between baseline Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) at follow-up. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analysis.
Results: A total of 4 RCTs and 2848 patients were included, of whom 1580 (55%) received subcutaneous gantenerumab. Concerning clinical scores, the placebo group achieved better rates of change in the Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog13) (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.19- -0.03; p = 0.008569; I2 = 0%). Gantenerumab was strongly associated with the occurrence of ARIA-E and ARIA-H: (19.67% vs. 2.31%; RR 9.46; 95% CI 5.55-16.11; p = <0.000001; I2 = 10%) and (21.95% vs. 12.38%; RR 1.79; 95% CI 1.50-2.13; p = <0.000001; I2 = 0%), respectively.
Discussion: In this meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that gantenerumab is not safe and efficient for early AD, showing no improvement in clinical scores for AD and being associated with the occurrence of ARIA-E and ARIA-H.
简介甘特宁单抗是一种针对早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)中淀粉样β蛋白(Aβ)的单克隆抗体。作者试图评估甘特宁单抗对早期AD患者的安全性和有效性:对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了系统检索,直至2023年12月2日。采用Mantel-Haenszel方法和95%置信区间(CI)对数据进行检验。进行了元回归分析,以评估基线临床痴呆评定量表-方框总和(CDR-SB)与随访时淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)之间可能存在的联系。统计分析使用 4.2.3 版 R:共纳入了 4 项 RCT 和 2848 名患者,其中 1580 人(55%)接受了皮下注射甘特纳单抗。在临床评分方面,安慰剂组的疾病评估量表(ADAS-Cog13)变化率更高(SMD -0.11;95% CI -0.19--0.03;p = 0.008569;I2 = 0%)。Gantenerumab与ARIA-E和ARIA-H的发生密切相关:分别为(19.67% vs. 2.31%;RR 9.46;95% CI 5.55-16.11;p = 2 = 10%)和(21.95% vs. 12.38%;RR 1.79;95% CI 1.50-2.13;p = 2 = 0%):在这项荟萃分析中,一致的结果表明,甘特单抗对早期AD并不安全有效,对AD的临床评分没有改善,而且与ARIA-E和ARIA-H的发生有关。
{"title":"Gantenerumab for early Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Artur Menegaz de Almeida, Marianna Leite, Lucca Moreira Lopes, Pedro Gomes Lima, Maria Luísa Siegloch Barros, Samuel Rocha Pinheiro, Ítalo Andrade, Patrícia Viana, Victória Morbach, Gabriel Marinheiro, Ricardo de Oliveira, Agostinho C Pinheiro","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2367016","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2367016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gantenerumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid β protein (Aβ) in early Alzheimer's disease (AD). The authors sought to evaluate gantenerumab safety and efficacy in early AD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until 2 December 2023. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression analysis was conducted to evaluate a possible link between baseline Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) at follow-up. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4 RCTs and 2848 patients were included, of whom 1580 (55%) received subcutaneous gantenerumab. Concerning clinical scores, the placebo group achieved better rates of change in the Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog13) (SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.19- -0.03; <i>p</i> = 0.008569; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Gantenerumab was strongly associated with the occurrence of ARIA-E and ARIA-H: (19.67% vs. 2.31%; RR 9.46; 95% CI 5.55-16.11; <i>p</i> = <0.000001; I<sup>2</sup> = 10%) and (21.95% vs. 12.38%; RR 1.79; 95% CI 1.50-2.13; <i>p</i> = <0.000001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this meta-analysis, consistent results suggest that gantenerumab is not safe and efficient for early AD, showing no improvement in clinical scores for AD and being associated with the occurrence of ARIA-E and ARIA-H.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"929-936"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141327373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2374024
Joseph Blanco, Pamela Quimbaya, Manuel Mena, Seetal Dodd, Rosa-Helena Bustos
Introduction: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common mental health disorder marked by sadness, hopelessness, and anhedonia. Various therapies exist, but their effectiveness is limited. Dextromethorphan hydrobromide combined with bupropion hydrochloride (Auvelity®) is a recently approved alternative for treating this condition in adults.
Areas covered: This review summarizes the neurobiology of major depression and delves into the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dextromethorphan plus bupropion in adult patients. It is based on observational studies, clinical trials, and other secondary studies obtained through systematic literature searches.
Expert opinion: The combination of bupropion and dextromethorphan as a new pharmacotherapy for mental health is an interesting addition to the treatment options that can be used for MDD. The combination can be used in a range of scenarios, including as a first line therapy, as a second option when a patient has failed to achieve remission with a serotonin targeting agent, and for treatment resistant depression. Further research for other indications, including addiction disorders, may provide exciting results. Although a new combination, clinicians will be very familiar with both agents, increasing their acceptability. This pharmacotherapy also may bring increased impetus for discovering other combinations that may have beneficial synergistic effects.
{"title":"Profiling the combination of bupropion and dextromethorphan as a treatment option for major depressive disorder.","authors":"Joseph Blanco, Pamela Quimbaya, Manuel Mena, Seetal Dodd, Rosa-Helena Bustos","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2374024","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2374024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a common mental health disorder marked by sadness, hopelessness, and anhedonia. Various therapies exist, but their effectiveness is limited. Dextromethorphan hydrobromide combined with bupropion hydrochloride (Auvelity®) is a recently approved alternative for treating this condition in adults.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review summarizes the neurobiology of major depression and delves into the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dextromethorphan plus bupropion in adult patients. It is based on observational studies, clinical trials, and other secondary studies obtained through systematic literature searches.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The combination of bupropion and dextromethorphan as a new pharmacotherapy for mental health is an interesting addition to the treatment options that can be used for MDD. The combination can be used in a range of scenarios, including as a first line therapy, as a second option when a patient has failed to achieve remission with a serotonin targeting agent, and for treatment resistant depression. Further research for other indications, including addiction disorders, may provide exciting results. Although a new combination, clinicians will be very familiar with both agents, increasing their acceptability. This pharmacotherapy also may bring increased impetus for discovering other combinations that may have beneficial synergistic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"837-848"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-16DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2365943
Ofer Agid
{"title":"Re-evaluating the prognosis of schizophrenia: tackling the issue of inadequate treatment.","authors":"Ofer Agid","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2365943","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2365943","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"831-835"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141327406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}