Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2385952
William Blanks, Marcus Hanshaw, Daniela A Perez-Chadid, Brandon Lucke-Wold
Introduction: Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disorder associated with repetitive head trauma. Historically, the diagnosis has been primarily clinical, which has hindered definitive early diagnosis and proactive intervention.
Areas covered: The authors analyze the recent advancements in early diagnosis of CTE by examining biomarkers, imaging, and clinical decision tools. They discuss the identification of neuropathologies - such as tau aggregates - through novel techniques ranging from blood sampling and to brain density scanning. The reader will walk away with a better understanding of current advancements in early detection and be better equipped to deal with encephalopathies secondary to trauma in clinical practice.
Expert opinion: Tremendous progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology of CTE. Despite these advancements, CTE treatment is still primarily symptomatic rather than underlying disease. Future research should focus on integrating current understanding of CTE pathophysiology with treatment modalities.
{"title":"Emerging frontiers in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: early diagnosis and implications for neurotherapeutic interventions.","authors":"William Blanks, Marcus Hanshaw, Daniela A Perez-Chadid, Brandon Lucke-Wold","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385952","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385952","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disorder associated with repetitive head trauma. Historically, the diagnosis has been primarily clinical, which has hindered definitive early diagnosis and proactive intervention.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors analyze the recent advancements in early diagnosis of CTE by examining biomarkers, imaging, and clinical decision tools. They discuss the identification of neuropathologies - such as tau aggregates - through novel techniques ranging from blood sampling and to brain density scanning. The reader will walk away with a better understanding of current advancements in early detection and be better equipped to deal with encephalopathies secondary to trauma in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Tremendous progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology of CTE. Despite these advancements, CTE treatment is still primarily symptomatic rather than underlying disease. Future research should focus on integrating current understanding of CTE pathophysiology with treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"953-961"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141906368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2385947
Alessandra Burini, Gaia Pellitteri, Giovanni Merlino, Annacarmen Nilo, Yan Tereshko, Pierluigi Dolso, Gian Luigi Gigli, Mariarosaria Valente
Introduction: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensory-motor sleep disorder that affects up to 13% of adults in the Western world and 2-4% of children. It impairs night sleep with an impact on daily performances and life quality. Thus, moderate-to-severe RLS requires pharmacological treatment.
Areas covered: In the present review, which is based on PubMed searches with no time limits, the authors discuss the recommended pharmacotherapy for RLS in addition to other emerging treatment options. The authors provide coverage to the current recommendations for both adults and pediatric patients with RLS.
Expert opinion: Current evidence suggests removing all causes of secondary RLS, including iron deficiency, chronic renal failure, drugs, and treating other sleep disorders that may worsen symptoms. Also, intermittent RLS should be addressed with behavioral measures and on-demand therapy. For chronic persistent RLS, α2δ calcium channel ligands are a first-line pharmacological approach, whereas dopamine agonists are associated with increased risk and should be spared. When RLS is refractory to first-line treatment, polytherapy, or opioid monotherapy should be considered. Nonetheless, some patients may not reach sustained symptom relief. Further research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of RLS and to develop newer more effective drugs.
{"title":"Current and emerging pharmaceutical strategies for the treatment and management of restless legs syndrome.","authors":"Alessandra Burini, Gaia Pellitteri, Giovanni Merlino, Annacarmen Nilo, Yan Tereshko, Pierluigi Dolso, Gian Luigi Gigli, Mariarosaria Valente","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385947","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385947","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensory-motor sleep disorder that affects up to 13% of adults in the Western world and 2-4% of children. It impairs night sleep with an impact on daily performances and life quality. Thus, moderate-to-severe RLS requires pharmacological treatment.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In the present review, which is based on PubMed searches with no time limits, the authors discuss the recommended pharmacotherapy for RLS in addition to other emerging treatment options. The authors provide coverage to the current recommendations for both adults and pediatric patients with RLS.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Current evidence suggests removing all causes of secondary RLS, including iron deficiency, chronic renal failure, drugs, and treating other sleep disorders that may worsen symptoms. Also, intermittent RLS should be addressed with behavioral measures and on-demand therapy. For chronic persistent RLS, α<sub>2</sub>δ calcium channel ligands are a first-line pharmacological approach, whereas dopamine agonists are associated with increased risk and should be spared. When RLS is refractory to first-line treatment, polytherapy, or opioid monotherapy should be considered. Nonetheless, some patients may not reach sustained symptom relief. Further research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of RLS and to develop newer more effective drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"997-1009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-21DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2382463
Abhishek Lenka, Joseph Jankovic
Introduction: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a childhood-onset neurobehavioral disorder characterized by tics. Pharmacotherapy is advised for patients whose symptoms affect their quality of life.
Areas covered: The authors review the tic phenomenology and TS diagnostic criteria. The bulk of this article focuses on pharmacotherapeutic options for treating tics. They also highlight pharmacotherapies in the research pipeline.
Expert opinion: Tic treatment must be tailored to individual needs. Behavioral therapy is the first line of treatment. Most with bothersome tics need pharmacotherapy and rarely, for medication-refractory cases, surgical therapy is indicated. Alpha-2 agonists are considered in patients with mild tics, especially in those with attention deficit with or without hyperactivity. Second-generation antipsychotics like aripiprazole and tiapride may be considered for severe tics. However, prescribers should be mindful of potential side effects, especially drug-induced movement disorders. Botulinum toxin injections may be considered for focal motor tics. Topiramate can be considered when other treatments are ineffective, and its benefits outweigh the risks. The same holds true for vesicular monoamine transporter-2 inhibitors, as they are deemed to be safe and effective in real-world use and open-label trials despite not meeting primary endpoints in placebo-controlled trials. Cannabinoids may be considered in adults if the approaches above do not control tics.
{"title":"An update on the pharmacological management of Tourette syndrome and emerging treatment paradigms.","authors":"Abhishek Lenka, Joseph Jankovic","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2382463","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2382463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tourette syndrome (TS) is a childhood-onset neurobehavioral disorder characterized by tics. Pharmacotherapy is advised for patients whose symptoms affect their quality of life.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors review the tic phenomenology and TS diagnostic criteria. The bulk of this article focuses on pharmacotherapeutic options for treating tics. They also highlight pharmacotherapies in the research pipeline.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Tic treatment must be tailored to individual needs. Behavioral therapy is the first line of treatment. Most with bothersome tics need pharmacotherapy and rarely, for medication-refractory cases, surgical therapy is indicated. Alpha-2 agonists are considered in patients with mild tics, especially in those with attention deficit with or without hyperactivity. Second-generation antipsychotics like aripiprazole and tiapride may be considered for severe tics. However, prescribers should be mindful of potential side effects, especially drug-induced movement disorders. Botulinum toxin injections may be considered for focal motor tics. Topiramate can be considered when other treatments are ineffective, and its benefits outweigh the risks. The same holds true for vesicular monoamine transporter-2 inhibitors, as they are deemed to be safe and effective in real-world use and open-label trials despite not meeting primary endpoints in placebo-controlled trials. Cannabinoids may be considered in adults if the approaches above do not control tics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1025-1033"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141733886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-04DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2385932
David W Goodman, Samuele Cortese, Stephen V Faraone
{"title":"Why is ADHD so difficult to diagnose in older adults?","authors":"David W Goodman, Samuele Cortese, Stephen V Faraone","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385932","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385932","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"941-944"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141888897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-07DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2385941
Giuseppe Schirò, Salvatore Iacono, Giuseppe Salemi, Paolo Ragonese
Introduction: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G associated disease (MOGAD) is a clinical entity distinct from multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 (AQP4+)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of current treatments used for MOGAD.
Areas covered: In this article, the authors review the currently available literature on the pharmacological management of MOGAD. This article is based on an extensive search for articles including meta-analyses, clinical trials, systematic reviews, observational studies, case series and case reports.
Expert opinion: Intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone is the most common therapy for acute attack with patients having a good treatment response. In cases with poor recovery, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) or plasma-exchange proved to be effective. Maintenance therapies include mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, IVIG, oral corticosteroids, rituximab, and interleukin-6 receptor (IL6-R) antagonists. Rituximab is the most used drug while IL6-R antagonists emerged as an effective option for people not responding to current treatments. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm whether the blockage of the IL6-R is an effective and safe option. Since there is no evidence of major safety issues related to the new available therapies, the authors believe that waiting for disease activity to consider a possible treatment change, is an unwise approach.
{"title":"The pharmacological management of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G associated disease (MOGAD): an update of the literature.","authors":"Giuseppe Schirò, Salvatore Iacono, Giuseppe Salemi, Paolo Ragonese","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385941","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2385941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G associated disease (MOGAD) is a clinical entity distinct from multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 (AQP4+)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. There is a lack of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of current treatments used for MOGAD.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, the authors review the currently available literature on the pharmacological management of MOGAD. This article is based on an extensive search for articles including meta-analyses, clinical trials, systematic reviews, observational studies, case series and case reports.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone is the most common therapy for acute attack with patients having a good treatment response. In cases with poor recovery, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) or plasma-exchange proved to be effective. Maintenance therapies include mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, IVIG, oral corticosteroids, rituximab, and interleukin-6 receptor (IL6-R) antagonists. Rituximab is the most used drug while IL6-R antagonists emerged as an effective option for people not responding to current treatments. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm whether the blockage of the IL6-R is an effective and safe option. Since there is no evidence of major safety issues related to the new available therapies, the authors believe that waiting for disease activity to consider a possible treatment change, is an unwise approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"985-996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141897179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-07-09DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2376836
James E Eaton, Daniel O Claassen
{"title":"Guidance on antipsychotic selection for agitation and aggressive behavior in persons with Huntington's disease.","authors":"James E Eaton, Daniel O Claassen","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2376836","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2376836","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"937-940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141563081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2386429
Andrea Amerio, Gabriele Arduino, Fabio Fesce, Alessandra Costanza, Andrea Aguglia, Mario Amore, Gianluca Serafini
Introduction: Early diagnosis and treatment concerning bipolar disorder (BD) are related to a better functioning over the long-term period. Although pharmacotherapy is indicated for approximately all youths with BD, nearly one-third of patients do not receive adequate medications for their condition.
Areas covered: The authors discuss the available scientific evidence from the current literature about the management of BD in both children and adolescents, giving particular focus to the efficacy and tolerability of the available pharmacological agents. Studies were identified searching MEDLINE and retrieved from reference listings of relevant articles and through consultation with experts in the field.
Expert opinion: Many D2-blockers, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on their antimanic properties in youths, are related to both short- and long-term side effects. Lurasidone was found to be effective for the treatment of acute juvenile bipolar depression, while lithium for the treatment and recurrence prevention of manic/mixed episodes. The most common anticonvulsants were found to be most useful as adjunctive antimanic agents in non-responders to first-line monotherapies. No data was found to support the use of antidepressants in juvenile BD.
{"title":"Advances in the management of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents: an update on the literature.","authors":"Andrea Amerio, Gabriele Arduino, Fabio Fesce, Alessandra Costanza, Andrea Aguglia, Mario Amore, Gianluca Serafini","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2386429","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2386429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early diagnosis and treatment concerning bipolar disorder (BD) are related to a better functioning over the long-term period. Although pharmacotherapy is indicated for approximately all youths with BD, nearly one-third of patients do not receive adequate medications for their condition.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors discuss the available scientific evidence from the current literature about the management of BD in both children and adolescents, giving particular focus to the efficacy and tolerability of the available pharmacological agents. Studies were identified searching MEDLINE and retrieved from reference listings of relevant articles and through consultation with experts in the field.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Many D2-blockers, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on their antimanic properties in youths, are related to both short- and long-term side effects. Lurasidone was found to be effective for the treatment of acute juvenile bipolar depression, while lithium for the treatment and recurrence prevention of manic/mixed episodes. The most common anticonvulsants were found to be most useful as adjunctive antimanic agents in non-responders to first-line monotherapies. No data was found to support the use of antidepressants in juvenile BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1011-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141888895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2389921
Mathilde Chevignard, Hugo Câmara-Costa, Georges Dellatolas
Introduction: Severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (spTBI), including abusive head trauma (AHT) in young children, is a major public health problem. Long-term consequences of spTBI include a large variety of physical, neurological, biological, cognitive, behavioral and social deficits and impairments.
Areas covered: The present narrative review summarizes studies and reviews published from January 2019 to February 2024 on spTBI. Significant papers published before 2019 were also included. The article gives coverage to the causes of spTBI, its epidemiology and fatality rates; disparities, inequalities, and socioeconomic factors; critical care; outcomes; and interventions.
Expert opinion: There are disparities between countries and according to socio-economic factors regarding causes, treatments and outcomes of spTBI. AHT has an overall poor outcome. Adherence to critical care guidelines is imperfect and the evidence-base of guidelines needs further investigations. Neuroimaging and biomarker predictors of outcomes is a rapidly evolving domain. Long-term cognitive, behavioral and psychosocial difficulties are the most prevalent and disabling. Their investigation should make a clear distinction between objective (clinical examination, cognitive tests, facts) and subjective measures (estimations using patient- and proxy-reported questionnaires), considering possible common source bias in reported difficulties. Family/caregiver-focused interventions, ecological approaches, and use of technology in delivery of interventions are recommended to improve long-term difficulties after spTBI.
{"title":"Predicting and improving outcome in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Mathilde Chevignard, Hugo Câmara-Costa, Georges Dellatolas","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2389921","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2389921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (spTBI), including abusive head trauma (AHT) in young children, is a major public health problem. Long-term consequences of spTBI include a large variety of physical, neurological, biological, cognitive, behavioral and social deficits and impairments.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The present narrative review summarizes studies and reviews published from January 2019 to February 2024 on spTBI. Significant papers published before 2019 were also included. The article gives coverage to the causes of spTBI, its epidemiology and fatality rates; disparities, inequalities, and socioeconomic factors; critical care; outcomes; and interventions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There are disparities between countries and according to socio-economic factors regarding causes, treatments and outcomes of spTBI. AHT has an overall poor outcome. Adherence to critical care guidelines is imperfect and the evidence-base of guidelines needs further investigations. Neuroimaging and biomarker predictors of outcomes is a rapidly evolving domain. Long-term cognitive, behavioral and psychosocial difficulties are the most prevalent and disabling. Their investigation should make a clear distinction between objective (clinical examination, cognitive tests, facts) and subjective measures (estimations using patient- and proxy-reported questionnaires), considering possible common source bias in reported difficulties. Family/caregiver-focused interventions, ecological approaches, and use of technology in delivery of interventions are recommended to improve long-term difficulties after spTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"963-983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141975454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2402058
Shreeya Thussu,Aniketh Naidu,Sindhu Manivannan,George T Grossberg
INTRODUCTIONAlzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia worldwide. Aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-beta, became the first disease-modifying treatment for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild AD dementia and suggested that removing amyloid from the brain, especially in early AD, might make a difference in slowing cognitive decline.AREAS COVEREDIn this review, the authors outline aducanumab's clinical efficacy as shown through key clinical trials and discuss its approval by the Food and Drug Administration under the accelerated pathway, which sparked both hope and controversy. We also discuss the importance of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities as a major side effect of aducanumab and all subsequent monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-beta.EXPERT OPINIONAducanumab, became the first monoclonal antibody that provided at least partial support for the amyloid hypothesis by demonstrating slowed cognitive decline by removing amyloid from the brain, although full FDA approval now seems unlikely due to discontinuation of its development. Its introduction raised awareness of ARIA, highlighted the significant costs and need for informed consent in treatment, and emphasized the importance of long-term, diverse, and combination therapy data for future AD treatments targeting amyloid and tau.
引言 阿尔茨海默病是全球最常见的痴呆症。阿杜单抗是一种靶向淀粉样蛋白-β的单克隆抗体,它是治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)引起的轻度认知障碍和轻度 AD 痴呆症的第一种疾病改变疗法,并表明清除大脑中的淀粉样蛋白,尤其是在 AD 早期,可能会在减缓认知功能衰退方面有所作为。在这篇综述中,作者概述了关键临床试验所显示的阿杜卡单抗的临床疗效,并讨论了美国食品药品管理局在加速途径下批准阿杜卡单抗的情况,这引发了人们的希望和争议。我们还讨论了淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常作为阿杜单抗及随后所有靶向淀粉样蛋白-β的单克隆抗体的主要副作用的重要性。专家观点阿杜单抗是首个至少部分支持淀粉样蛋白假说的单克隆抗体,它通过清除大脑中的淀粉样蛋白减缓了认知功能的衰退,尽管由于其研发中止,美国食品药品管理局现在似乎不可能完全批准它。它的问世提高了人们对ARIA的认识,强调了治疗中的巨大成本和知情同意的必要性,并强调了长期、多样化和联合治疗数据对未来针对淀粉样蛋白和tau的AD治疗的重要性。
{"title":"Profiling aducanumab as a treatment option for alzheimer's disease: an overview of efficacy, safety and tolerability.","authors":"Shreeya Thussu,Aniketh Naidu,Sindhu Manivannan,George T Grossberg","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2402058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2402058","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONAlzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia worldwide. Aducanumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-beta, became the first disease-modifying treatment for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild AD dementia and suggested that removing amyloid from the brain, especially in early AD, might make a difference in slowing cognitive decline.AREAS COVEREDIn this review, the authors outline aducanumab's clinical efficacy as shown through key clinical trials and discuss its approval by the Food and Drug Administration under the accelerated pathway, which sparked both hope and controversy. We also discuss the importance of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities as a major side effect of aducanumab and all subsequent monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-beta.EXPERT OPINIONAducanumab, became the first monoclonal antibody that provided at least partial support for the amyloid hypothesis by demonstrating slowed cognitive decline by removing amyloid from the brain, although full FDA approval now seems unlikely due to discontinuation of its development. Its introduction raised awareness of ARIA, highlighted the significant costs and need for informed consent in treatment, and emphasized the importance of long-term, diverse, and combination therapy data for future AD treatments targeting amyloid and tau.","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":"402 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142254178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2401558
William David Wells-Gatnik,Lanfranco Pellesi,Paolo Martelletti
INTRODUCTIONRimegepant and atogepant, two innovative oral medications for the treatment of migraine, are gaining prominence in the treatment of migraine. However, outside of specialist headache centers, these novel medications remain subjectively underutilized. While multiple rationales exist describing their underutilization, a leading factor is the complexity and clinical flexibility attributed to the individual members of the gepant medication class.AREAS COVEREDThis review provides a brief review of the current uses, common adverse events, and potential areas of future clinical innovation attributed to rimegepant and atogepant. A database search for the term 'Rimegepant OR Atogepant' was completed, yielding 240 individual results. Following multiple rounds of assessment that aimed to determine relevance of each individual result, 42 studies were included in the synthesis of this review.EXPERT OPINIONRimegepant and atogepant are exciting medications that demonstrate significant clinical innovation within the field of migraine therapy. While current indications are clear, data is lacking regarding the future expanded roles of these medications. Current areas of potential therapeutic innovation for rimegepant and atogepant include the pediatric population, in pregnancy and breastfeeding, in cluster headache and post-traumatic headache, and in patients that previously discontinued calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy.
{"title":"Rimegepant and atogepant: novel drugs providing innovative opportunities in the management of migraine.","authors":"William David Wells-Gatnik,Lanfranco Pellesi,Paolo Martelletti","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2401558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2401558","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTIONRimegepant and atogepant, two innovative oral medications for the treatment of migraine, are gaining prominence in the treatment of migraine. However, outside of specialist headache centers, these novel medications remain subjectively underutilized. While multiple rationales exist describing their underutilization, a leading factor is the complexity and clinical flexibility attributed to the individual members of the gepant medication class.AREAS COVEREDThis review provides a brief review of the current uses, common adverse events, and potential areas of future clinical innovation attributed to rimegepant and atogepant. A database search for the term 'Rimegepant OR Atogepant' was completed, yielding 240 individual results. Following multiple rounds of assessment that aimed to determine relevance of each individual result, 42 studies were included in the synthesis of this review.EXPERT OPINIONRimegepant and atogepant are exciting medications that demonstrate significant clinical innovation within the field of migraine therapy. While current indications are clear, data is lacking regarding the future expanded roles of these medications. Current areas of potential therapeutic innovation for rimegepant and atogepant include the pediatric population, in pregnancy and breastfeeding, in cluster headache and post-traumatic headache, and in patients that previously discontinued calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy.","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142205617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}