Woo Jin Seog, S. Dhruv, K. Atodaria, A. Polavarapu
Signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum is a rare variant of colorectal cancer. When found, it is often diagnosed in late stages and has poor prognosis. This case depicts a patient with a history of Crohn’s disease who presented to the hospital for perirectal abscesses. During the evaluation of both the abscesses and Crohn’s disease, he was found to have stage IV adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features. The patient was started on chemotherapy before surgical resection was considered, however, showed little response. The patient’s family eventually pursued hospice care with comfort measures only. Colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma is rare but has poor prognosis as it is diagnosed generally at late and advanced stages. There is a need for more research in earlier detection of these rare cancers.
{"title":"An Extremely Rare Case of Rectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma","authors":"Woo Jin Seog, S. Dhruv, K. Atodaria, A. Polavarapu","doi":"10.14740/gr1516","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1516","url":null,"abstract":"Signet ring cell carcinoma of the rectum is a rare variant of colorectal cancer. When found, it is often diagnosed in late stages and has poor prognosis. This case depicts a patient with a history of Crohn’s disease who presented to the hospital for perirectal abscesses. During the evaluation of both the abscesses and Crohn’s disease, he was found to have stage IV adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features. The patient was started on chemotherapy before surgical resection was considered, however, showed little response. The patient’s family eventually pursued hospice care with comfort measures only. Colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma is rare but has poor prognosis as it is diagnosed generally at late and advanced stages. There is a need for more research in earlier detection of these rare cancers.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"106 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42641194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mira Alsheikh, K. Kamar, Malek Kreidieh, Rola Sasso, Samragnyi Madala, Rubal Sharma, Hassan Al Moussawi, L. Deeb
Background Patients with liver cirrhosis have altered hepatic synthetic functions which theoretically result in reduced levels of pro-and anti-coagulant factors as well as thrombocytopenia. Initially, cirrhotic patients were thought to be at an increased risk of bleeding and a reduced risk of thrombosis. Several studies have recently reported an increased occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cirrhotic patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the current practice of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, the incidence and predictors of VTE, and the associated bleeding sequelae in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed. We included all adult patients with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis from January 2010 to June 2019 admitted to the hospital. Our cohort patients were divided into two groups, cirrhotic patients with pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and those with mechanical or no VTE prophylaxis. Results We included 601 cirrhotic patients in our study. The incidence of VTE occurring within the first 6 months of their admission was 1.5%. Seven patients (1.49%) developed VTE with the majority being DVTs while not on pharmacologic prophylaxis, and two patients developed VTE despite being on pharmacologic prophylaxis; however, there was no statistical difference. Alcohol use was the most common underlying cause of liver cirrhosis (40.4%), followed by chronic hepatitis C (21.1%), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (11.3%). Out of the 601 patients included, 69 patients received neither pharmacologic nor mechanical VTE prophylactic agent (11.48%), while the remaining majority received either pharmacological or mechanical prophylaxis (88.52%). Conclusions Our study did not show a statistically significant association between the use of pharmacological VTE prophylactic agents and a reduction in the risk of VTE in cirrhotic patients. The rates of usage of DVT prophylactic agents among our Northwell hospitals during the study period appeared to be no longer suboptimal when compared to prior studies. Low albumin appears to be a predictor factor to develop VTE. There was a statistically significant increase in bleeding risk and transfusion requirement in cirrhotic patients receiving no pharmacological VTE prophylactic agents. Further prospective trials are needed to shed more light on this subject and identify the group of cirrhotic patients who could safely benefit from pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis.
{"title":"The Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Practice of Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis Among Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients","authors":"Mira Alsheikh, K. Kamar, Malek Kreidieh, Rola Sasso, Samragnyi Madala, Rubal Sharma, Hassan Al Moussawi, L. Deeb","doi":"10.14740/gr1493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1493","url":null,"abstract":"Background Patients with liver cirrhosis have altered hepatic synthetic functions which theoretically result in reduced levels of pro-and anti-coagulant factors as well as thrombocytopenia. Initially, cirrhotic patients were thought to be at an increased risk of bleeding and a reduced risk of thrombosis. Several studies have recently reported an increased occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cirrhotic patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the current practice of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, the incidence and predictors of VTE, and the associated bleeding sequelae in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed. We included all adult patients with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis from January 2010 to June 2019 admitted to the hospital. Our cohort patients were divided into two groups, cirrhotic patients with pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and those with mechanical or no VTE prophylaxis. Results We included 601 cirrhotic patients in our study. The incidence of VTE occurring within the first 6 months of their admission was 1.5%. Seven patients (1.49%) developed VTE with the majority being DVTs while not on pharmacologic prophylaxis, and two patients developed VTE despite being on pharmacologic prophylaxis; however, there was no statistical difference. Alcohol use was the most common underlying cause of liver cirrhosis (40.4%), followed by chronic hepatitis C (21.1%), and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (11.3%). Out of the 601 patients included, 69 patients received neither pharmacologic nor mechanical VTE prophylactic agent (11.48%), while the remaining majority received either pharmacological or mechanical prophylaxis (88.52%). Conclusions Our study did not show a statistically significant association between the use of pharmacological VTE prophylactic agents and a reduction in the risk of VTE in cirrhotic patients. The rates of usage of DVT prophylactic agents among our Northwell hospitals during the study period appeared to be no longer suboptimal when compared to prior studies. Low albumin appears to be a predictor factor to develop VTE. There was a statistically significant increase in bleeding risk and transfusion requirement in cirrhotic patients receiving no pharmacological VTE prophylactic agents. Further prospective trials are needed to shed more light on this subject and identify the group of cirrhotic patients who could safely benefit from pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"67 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43577880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a wireless technology used by gastroenterologists for various indications in their clinical practice. There has been significant improvement in this technology since its start about two decades ago. Specific video capsules have been made to evaluate the small bowel, colon, and esophagus. Now pan-enteric video capsule is available to assess both the small bowel and colon. VCE is a non-invasive procedure that has been tremendously evaluated for various gastrointestinal disorders, particularly small intestinal bleeding. There are specific contraindications and complications of VCE. This procedure has the technical part and video reading part. Newer software programs will come to reduce the reading time. Artificial intelligence is also coming for quick and accurate diagnosis of any positive findings during VCE. VCE is an important diagnostic test in the field of gastroenterology. Although it is an addition to optical endoscopic procedures to visualize the gastrointestinal mucosa, it has advantages and disadvantages.
{"title":"Video Capsule Endoscopy in Gastroenterology","authors":"Monjur Ahmed","doi":"10.14740/gr1487","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1487","url":null,"abstract":"Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a wireless technology used by gastroenterologists for various indications in their clinical practice. There has been significant improvement in this technology since its start about two decades ago. Specific video capsules have been made to evaluate the small bowel, colon, and esophagus. Now pan-enteric video capsule is available to assess both the small bowel and colon. VCE is a non-invasive procedure that has been tremendously evaluated for various gastrointestinal disorders, particularly small intestinal bleeding. There are specific contraindications and complications of VCE. This procedure has the technical part and video reading part. Newer software programs will come to reduce the reading time. Artificial intelligence is also coming for quick and accurate diagnosis of any positive findings during VCE. VCE is an important diagnostic test in the field of gastroenterology. Although it is an addition to optical endoscopic procedures to visualize the gastrointestinal mucosa, it has advantages and disadvantages.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"47 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67216137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Abomhya, Mohammed Mahmoodurrahman, Salman Ayaz, H. Hamad, F. Khan
Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging extraintestinal manifestation (EIM) of Crohn’s disease (CD). We aimed to investigate the prevalence and comorbid predictors of NAFLD in patients with CD. Methods We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study to determine the prevalence, characteristics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes associated with NAFLD in patients with CD. Comparison between groups was performed by Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. We performed a binary logistic regression analysis for predictors of NAFLD among patients with CD. Results We extracted 215,049 index hospital discharges with CD; 2.4% had NAFLD. CD patients, with NAFLD, had increased length of stay (4 days; interquartile range (IQR): 2 - 6 vs. 3; IQR: 2 - 6, P < 0.01), and increased median total charges ($32,305.5; IQR: $18,600 - $61,599 vs. $30,782; IQR: $16,847 - $58,667, P < 0.01), compared to CD patients without NAFLD. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) was found to be independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1 - 2.6, P = 0.03) and a higher odd for all-cause 30-day non-elective readmission (OR: 1.6: 95% CI: 1.3 - 1.9, P < 0.001). Factors independently associated with NAFLD in patients with CD included portal hypertension (OR: 5.347; 95% CI: 4.604 - 6.211, P < 0.001), vitamin A deficiency (OR: 9.89; 95% CI: 4.49 - 21.76, P < 0.001) and vitamin B12 deficiency (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.098 - 2.209, P = 0.013). Conclusions NAFLD is associated with worse hospitalization outcomes in patients with CD. Study findings suggest the need for early identification and effective management of NAFLD predictors to reduce complications.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是克罗恩病(CD)的一种新出现的肠外表现(EIM)。我们的目的是研究CD患者NAFLD的患病率和共病预测因素。方法我们进行了一项全国性的回顾性队列研究,以确定CD患者NAFLD的患病率、特征、合并症和住院结果。组间比较采用连续变量的Mann-Whitney检验和分类变量的卡方检验。我们对CD患者中NAFLD的预测因素进行了二元logistic回归分析。结果我们提取了215049例CD患者出院指数;2.4%为NAFLD。合并NAFLD的CD患者住院时间增加(4天;四分位间距(IQR): 2 - 6 vs. 3;IQR: 2 - 6, P < 0.01),总收费中位数增加(32,305.5美元;IQR: 18,600美元- 61,599美元vs. 30,782美元;IQR: $16,847 - $58,667, P < 0.01),与非NAFLD的CD患者相比。非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)被发现与死亡率增加独立相关(优势比(OR): 1.7;95%可信区间(CI): 1.1 - 2.6, P = 0.03),全因30天非选择性再入院的奇率更高(OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3 - 1.9, P < 0.001)。与乳糜泻患者NAFLD独立相关的因素包括门脉高压(OR: 5.347;95% CI: 4.604 - 6.211, P < 0.001),维生素A缺乏(OR: 9.89;95% CI: 4.49 - 21.76, P < 0.001)和维生素B12缺乏(OR: 1.56;95% ci: 1.098 - 2.209, p = 0.013)。结论:NAFLD与CD患者较差的住院结果相关。研究结果表明,需要早期识别和有效管理NAFLD预测因子,以减少并发症。
{"title":"Burden and Predictors of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Retrospective Cohort of Patients With Crohn’s Disease","authors":"A. Abomhya, Mohammed Mahmoodurrahman, Salman Ayaz, H. Hamad, F. Khan","doi":"10.14740/gr1509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1509","url":null,"abstract":"Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging extraintestinal manifestation (EIM) of Crohn’s disease (CD). We aimed to investigate the prevalence and comorbid predictors of NAFLD in patients with CD. Methods We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study to determine the prevalence, characteristics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes associated with NAFLD in patients with CD. Comparison between groups was performed by Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. We performed a binary logistic regression analysis for predictors of NAFLD among patients with CD. Results We extracted 215,049 index hospital discharges with CD; 2.4% had NAFLD. CD patients, with NAFLD, had increased length of stay (4 days; interquartile range (IQR): 2 - 6 vs. 3; IQR: 2 - 6, P < 0.01), and increased median total charges ($32,305.5; IQR: $18,600 - $61,599 vs. $30,782; IQR: $16,847 - $58,667, P < 0.01), compared to CD patients without NAFLD. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) was found to be independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1 - 2.6, P = 0.03) and a higher odd for all-cause 30-day non-elective readmission (OR: 1.6: 95% CI: 1.3 - 1.9, P < 0.001). Factors independently associated with NAFLD in patients with CD included portal hypertension (OR: 5.347; 95% CI: 4.604 - 6.211, P < 0.001), vitamin A deficiency (OR: 9.89; 95% CI: 4.49 - 21.76, P < 0.001) and vitamin B12 deficiency (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.098 - 2.209, P = 0.013). Conclusions NAFLD is associated with worse hospitalization outcomes in patients with CD. Study findings suggest the need for early identification and effective management of NAFLD predictors to reduce complications.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"82 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46595725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H. Laswi, Abdul-rahman Abusalim, Muhammad-Sheharyar Warraich, Katayoun Khoshbin, H. Shaka
Background Liver cirrhosis is a major burden on the health care system. Alcohol is one of the most common etiologies of cirrhosis. The aim of our article is to examine the trends of alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC) hospitalizations over the past two decades. Methods This was a retrospective longitudinal study. Using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System (ICD-9-CM/PCS) and the ICD-10-CM/PCS, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was analyzed. We included 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2018 NIS databases. Using multivariate regression analysis, we examined trends of ALC hospitalizations including inpatient mortality, mean length of stay (LOS), and mean total hospital charges (THCs). Results We included 261,420 hospitalizations with ALC as the primary diagnosis for admission. There was a trend toward increasing hospitalizations over that period; they increased from 46,186 in 1998 to 69,970 in 2018 (P < 0.001). Moreover, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the mean THC in 2018 compared to 1998 (P < 0.001). On the other hand, inpatient mortality decreased from 12.8% in 1998 to 4.7% in 2018 (P < 0.001), and a trend of decreasing mean LOS was observed. The mean LOS decreased from 7.0 days in 1998 to 5.9 days in 2018 (P < 0.001). Conclusions Over the last two decades, there was a trend of increasing hospitalizations and THC. However, we noticed a trend toward decreasing inpatient mortality and LOS over that period, which might reflect in part an improvement in the medical care provided for these patients.
{"title":"Trends and Outcomes of Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis Hospitalizations in the Last Two Decades: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample","authors":"H. Laswi, Abdul-rahman Abusalim, Muhammad-Sheharyar Warraich, Katayoun Khoshbin, H. Shaka","doi":"10.14740/gr1517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1517","url":null,"abstract":"Background Liver cirrhosis is a major burden on the health care system. Alcohol is one of the most common etiologies of cirrhosis. The aim of our article is to examine the trends of alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC) hospitalizations over the past two decades. Methods This was a retrospective longitudinal study. Using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System (ICD-9-CM/PCS) and the ICD-10-CM/PCS, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was analyzed. We included 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2018 NIS databases. Using multivariate regression analysis, we examined trends of ALC hospitalizations including inpatient mortality, mean length of stay (LOS), and mean total hospital charges (THCs). Results We included 261,420 hospitalizations with ALC as the primary diagnosis for admission. There was a trend toward increasing hospitalizations over that period; they increased from 46,186 in 1998 to 69,970 in 2018 (P < 0.001). Moreover, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the mean THC in 2018 compared to 1998 (P < 0.001). On the other hand, inpatient mortality decreased from 12.8% in 1998 to 4.7% in 2018 (P < 0.001), and a trend of decreasing mean LOS was observed. The mean LOS decreased from 7.0 days in 1998 to 5.9 days in 2018 (P < 0.001). Conclusions Over the last two decades, there was a trend of increasing hospitalizations and THC. However, we noticed a trend toward decreasing inpatient mortality and LOS over that period, which might reflect in part an improvement in the medical care provided for these patients.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"91 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41415654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eltaib A Saad, Abdalaziz Awadelkarim, M. Agab, Akram Babkir
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism being reported as the most frequent vascular complications in IBD patients. Much less frequently, arterial thromboembolic events may also be associated with greater morbidity and mortality. Aortic mural thrombosis is a rare phenomenon described in patients with IBD that often results in serious consequences such as visceral infarction and acute ischemia of the lower extremities. We described an unusual case of a female patient with Crohn’s disease (CD) who presented with generalized abdominal pain and vomiting. Imaging showed an active flare-up of intestinal CD as well as two mural thrombi in the distal descending thoracic aorta and the abdominal aorta at the level of the left renal artery, respectively, with a left renal infarction. The mesenteric angiogram revealed a patent celiac axis and mesenteric arteries. The patient was therapeutically anticoagulated, and she underwent a right hemicolectomy for the perforated ileal disease. A comprehensive diagnostic workup for hypercoagulability and thrombophilia was negative for an underlying etiology, and the active CD flare-up was considered the main culprit triggering the aortic thrombosis in this reported patient. Our case highlighted the occurrence of aortic thrombosis in a patient with IBD and that entails careful attention. Early recognition and timely management with a multidisciplinary team is the key to improving the outcome of aortic events that coincide with the active flare-up of IBD.
{"title":"Extensive Aortic Thrombosis and Renal Infarction in Association With an Active Flare-Up of Crohn’s Disease","authors":"Eltaib A Saad, Abdalaziz Awadelkarim, M. Agab, Akram Babkir","doi":"10.14740/gr1504","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1504","url":null,"abstract":"Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism being reported as the most frequent vascular complications in IBD patients. Much less frequently, arterial thromboembolic events may also be associated with greater morbidity and mortality. Aortic mural thrombosis is a rare phenomenon described in patients with IBD that often results in serious consequences such as visceral infarction and acute ischemia of the lower extremities. We described an unusual case of a female patient with Crohn’s disease (CD) who presented with generalized abdominal pain and vomiting. Imaging showed an active flare-up of intestinal CD as well as two mural thrombi in the distal descending thoracic aorta and the abdominal aorta at the level of the left renal artery, respectively, with a left renal infarction. The mesenteric angiogram revealed a patent celiac axis and mesenteric arteries. The patient was therapeutically anticoagulated, and she underwent a right hemicolectomy for the perforated ileal disease. A comprehensive diagnostic workup for hypercoagulability and thrombophilia was negative for an underlying etiology, and the active CD flare-up was considered the main culprit triggering the aortic thrombosis in this reported patient. Our case highlighted the occurrence of aortic thrombosis in a patient with IBD and that entails careful attention. Early recognition and timely management with a multidisciplinary team is the key to improving the outcome of aortic events that coincide with the active flare-up of IBD.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"100 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49104086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohammad H. Alomari, Suleiman I Al Ashi, P. Chadalavada, Shrouq Khazaaleh, F. Covut, Laith Al momani, Ahmed A. Elkafrawy, V. Padbidri, P. Funchain, Donald Campbell, Carlos Romero‐Marrero
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat advanced malignancies. However, they are associated with the development of multiple gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (GI-irAEs). We aimed to evaluate the types and severity of GI-irAEs associated with ICI therapy, to identify potential risk factors for developing GI-irAEs and to determine the relationship of GI-irAEs development to tumor responsiveness and overall survival. Methods All patients who received ICIs for advanced malignancies at our center were included. Medical records were reviewed, and data extraction included: baseline demographic characteristics, immunotherapy regimens, development of GI-irAEs, response to treatment, and overall survival. Overall survival was calculated from the date of treatment initiation and estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Five hundred sixty-seven patients received ICI therapy for stage IV malignancies. Forty-one (7%) patients experienced at least one GI-irAE. Among those experiencing GI-irAEs, 23 (56%) developed hepatitis, 17 (42%) developed colitis, four (10%) developed pancreatitis, and two (5%) developed gastritis. Patients who developed GI-irAEs experienced a better response to ICI therapy compared to patients who did not develop GI-irAEs (41% vs. 27%, P = 0.003). The 2-year overall survival rate of stage IV cancer patients who developed GI-irAEs was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49 - 79) and 36% for those who did not develop GI-irAEs (95% CI: 32 - 41) (P = 0.002). The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 28 months. Twelve (29%) of the patients receiving dual ICI therapy developed GI-irAEs. Conclusion Hepatitis, colitis, and pancreatitis were the most commonly encountered GI-irAEs with ICI therapy. Development of these GI-irAEs was associated with superior tumor responsiveness and better overall survival.
{"title":"Gastrointestinal Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Are Associated With Enhanced Tumor Responsiveness and Improved Survival","authors":"Mohammad H. Alomari, Suleiman I Al Ashi, P. Chadalavada, Shrouq Khazaaleh, F. Covut, Laith Al momani, Ahmed A. Elkafrawy, V. Padbidri, P. Funchain, Donald Campbell, Carlos Romero‐Marrero","doi":"10.14740/gr1491","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1491","url":null,"abstract":"Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat advanced malignancies. However, they are associated with the development of multiple gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (GI-irAEs). We aimed to evaluate the types and severity of GI-irAEs associated with ICI therapy, to identify potential risk factors for developing GI-irAEs and to determine the relationship of GI-irAEs development to tumor responsiveness and overall survival. Methods All patients who received ICIs for advanced malignancies at our center were included. Medical records were reviewed, and data extraction included: baseline demographic characteristics, immunotherapy regimens, development of GI-irAEs, response to treatment, and overall survival. Overall survival was calculated from the date of treatment initiation and estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Five hundred sixty-seven patients received ICI therapy for stage IV malignancies. Forty-one (7%) patients experienced at least one GI-irAE. Among those experiencing GI-irAEs, 23 (56%) developed hepatitis, 17 (42%) developed colitis, four (10%) developed pancreatitis, and two (5%) developed gastritis. Patients who developed GI-irAEs experienced a better response to ICI therapy compared to patients who did not develop GI-irAEs (41% vs. 27%, P = 0.003). The 2-year overall survival rate of stage IV cancer patients who developed GI-irAEs was 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49 - 79) and 36% for those who did not develop GI-irAEs (95% CI: 32 - 41) (P = 0.002). The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 28 months. Twelve (29%) of the patients receiving dual ICI therapy developed GI-irAEs. Conclusion Hepatitis, colitis, and pancreatitis were the most commonly encountered GI-irAEs with ICI therapy. Development of these GI-irAEs was associated with superior tumor responsiveness and better overall survival.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"56 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41918575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Umair Iqbal, Z. Ahmed, Hafsa Anwar, Nihit M. Shah, Wade M. Lee, A. Nawras, H. Khara, Aijaz Ahmed, S. Khurana
Background Hemorrhagic ascites is characterized as red blood cell count greater than 10,000/mm3. In cirrhosis, ascites is an event of decompensation, and associated with poor prognosis. However, significance of hemorrhagic ascites is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the significance of hemorrhagic ascites in cirrhotic patients. Methods We conducted a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry, and Web of Science Core Collection to identify studies till March 2021, which, in patients with cirrhosis, compared outcomes amongst those with hemorrhagic ascites to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality, and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Results Four studies, with 2,058 cirrhosis patients, were included. Among these, 1,488 patients had non-hemorrhagic ascites and 570 had hemorrhagic ascites. We observed no significant differences in AKI (odds ratio (OR) = 2.55; confidence interval (CI): 0.58 - 11.24), HE (OR = 2.52; CI: 0.70 - 9.05), SBP (OR = 1.66; CI: 0.12 - 22.83) and PVT (OR = 0.99; CI: 0.71 - 1.39). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly higher in patients with hemorrhagic ascites compared to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites (OR = 1.79; CI: 1.37 - 2.36; I2 = 56%). Pooled 3-year mortality was significantly higher in those with hemorrhagic (72.5% (CI: 68.2-76.4%)) when compared to non-hemorrhagic ascites (57.9% (CI: 55.2-60.6%)) (OR = 2.17; CI: 1.71 - 2.74) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15%). Conclusions In patients with cirrhosis, hemorrhagic ascites is a poor prognostic marker, which is associated with increased ICU stay and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate significance of hemorrhagic ascites in patients with cirrhosis.
背景出血性腹水的特征是红细胞计数大于10000/mm3。在肝硬化中,腹水是一种失代偿事件,与预后不良有关。然而,出血性腹水的意义尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估肝硬化患者出血性腹水的意义。方法我们在Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心、世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)国际临床试验注册中心和Web of Science核心集合中进行了系统检索,以确定截至2021年3月的研究,这些研究在肝硬化患者中比较了出血性腹水患者和非出血性腹水的结果。主要转归为3年死亡率,次要转归为急性肾损伤(AKI)、肝性脑病(HE)、自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)和门静脉血栓形成(PVT)。结果纳入4项研究,共2058例肝硬化患者。其中1488例为非出血性腹水,570例为出血性腹水。我们没有观察到AKI的显著差异(比值比(OR)=2.55;置信区间(CI):0.58-11.24)、HE(OR=2.52;CI:0.70-9.05)、SBP(OR=1.66;CI:0.12-22.83)和PVT(OR=0.99;CI:0.71-1.39)。出血性腹水患者的重症监护室(ICU)住院时间明显高于非出血性腹水(OR=1.79;CI:1.37-2.36;I2=56%)。出血性腹水患者的合并3年死亡率(72.5%(CI:68.2-76.4%))显著高于非出血性腹水(57.9%(CI:55.2-60.6%))(OR=2.17;CI:1.71-2.74)和低异质性(I2=15%)。结论在肝硬化患者中,出血性腹水是一个不良的预后标志,它与ICU住院时间和死亡率的增加有关。需要进行前瞻性研究来进一步评估肝硬化患者出血性腹水的意义。
{"title":"Hemorrhagic Ascites Is Associated With Reduced Survival in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Umair Iqbal, Z. Ahmed, Hafsa Anwar, Nihit M. Shah, Wade M. Lee, A. Nawras, H. Khara, Aijaz Ahmed, S. Khurana","doi":"10.14740/gr1485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1485","url":null,"abstract":"Background Hemorrhagic ascites is characterized as red blood cell count greater than 10,000/mm3. In cirrhosis, ascites is an event of decompensation, and associated with poor prognosis. However, significance of hemorrhagic ascites is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the significance of hemorrhagic ascites in cirrhotic patients. Methods We conducted a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry, and Web of Science Core Collection to identify studies till March 2021, which, in patients with cirrhosis, compared outcomes amongst those with hemorrhagic ascites to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality, and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Results Four studies, with 2,058 cirrhosis patients, were included. Among these, 1,488 patients had non-hemorrhagic ascites and 570 had hemorrhagic ascites. We observed no significant differences in AKI (odds ratio (OR) = 2.55; confidence interval (CI): 0.58 - 11.24), HE (OR = 2.52; CI: 0.70 - 9.05), SBP (OR = 1.66; CI: 0.12 - 22.83) and PVT (OR = 0.99; CI: 0.71 - 1.39). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly higher in patients with hemorrhagic ascites compared to those with non-hemorrhagic ascites (OR = 1.79; CI: 1.37 - 2.36; I2 = 56%). Pooled 3-year mortality was significantly higher in those with hemorrhagic (72.5% (CI: 68.2-76.4%)) when compared to non-hemorrhagic ascites (57.9% (CI: 55.2-60.6%)) (OR = 2.17; CI: 1.71 - 2.74) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15%). Conclusions In patients with cirrhosis, hemorrhagic ascites is a poor prognostic marker, which is associated with increased ICU stay and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate significance of hemorrhagic ascites in patients with cirrhosis.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"26 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46103721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Malek Kreidieh, Rachelle Hamadi, Mira Alsheikh, Hassan Al Moussawi, L. Deeb
Chronic liver disease (CLD) and its complications constitute a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Most deaths are secondary to the decompensation of cirrhosis and evolution of portal hypertension (PHTN). Since disease progression reversal is hardly attainable after decompensated cirrhosis develops, it is essential to intervene early with a therapeutic agent or regimen that could prevent or slow disease evolution. Thus far, there has been no agreed-upon medication to help in the fight against the development of cirrhosis or its decompensation. While early data depicted statins as harmful agents for the liver, current evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggests that they might have positive impact on CLD. Low-quality evidence supports the fact that statins reduce mortality in CLD. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that statins reduce the risk of hepatic decompensation, variceal bleeding, and mortality, especially among patients with compensated cirrhosis. Combining this data with the long track-record of safety and tolerability of statins and their potential benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk reduction, hepatologists might soon rely on statins to achieve better outcomes in their CLD and cirrhotic patients without significant additional costs. This review describes the rationale behind the use of statins in patients with CLD and cirrhosis. It sheds light on the current preclinical and clinical studies that reflect beneficial effects of the use of different types and doses of statins in the treatment of patients with different types and stages of CLD and cirrhosis. It also emphasizes the need for designing and developing additional large prospective interventional randomized control trials (RCTs) to better evaluate the association between statin exposure and the risk of fibrosis progression and development of cirrhosis in patients with non-cirrhotic CLDs, the risk of progression of PHTN in patients with cirrhosis, and the mortality rates in patients with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CLDs.
{"title":"Statin Use in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis: Current Evidence and Future Directions","authors":"Malek Kreidieh, Rachelle Hamadi, Mira Alsheikh, Hassan Al Moussawi, L. Deeb","doi":"10.14740/gr1498","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1498","url":null,"abstract":"Chronic liver disease (CLD) and its complications constitute a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Most deaths are secondary to the decompensation of cirrhosis and evolution of portal hypertension (PHTN). Since disease progression reversal is hardly attainable after decompensated cirrhosis develops, it is essential to intervene early with a therapeutic agent or regimen that could prevent or slow disease evolution. Thus far, there has been no agreed-upon medication to help in the fight against the development of cirrhosis or its decompensation. While early data depicted statins as harmful agents for the liver, current evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggests that they might have positive impact on CLD. Low-quality evidence supports the fact that statins reduce mortality in CLD. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that statins reduce the risk of hepatic decompensation, variceal bleeding, and mortality, especially among patients with compensated cirrhosis. Combining this data with the long track-record of safety and tolerability of statins and their potential benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk reduction, hepatologists might soon rely on statins to achieve better outcomes in their CLD and cirrhotic patients without significant additional costs. This review describes the rationale behind the use of statins in patients with CLD and cirrhosis. It sheds light on the current preclinical and clinical studies that reflect beneficial effects of the use of different types and doses of statins in the treatment of patients with different types and stages of CLD and cirrhosis. It also emphasizes the need for designing and developing additional large prospective interventional randomized control trials (RCTs) to better evaluate the association between statin exposure and the risk of fibrosis progression and development of cirrhosis in patients with non-cirrhotic CLDs, the risk of progression of PHTN in patients with cirrhosis, and the mortality rates in patients with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CLDs.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41573952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N. Abou-Ghanem, Eltaib A Saad, I. Oliff, A. Gidron, D. Filipiuk
Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is an extra-medullary solid tumor consisting of myeloid blasts or immature myeloid cells. MS is usually associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other myeloproliferative neoplasms or myelodysplastic disorders. Isolated MS is a rare clinical entity, and the small bowel is a rare phenomenon for the occurrence of MS. A 30-year-old African American female patient with a past medical history of asthma presented with acute abdominal pain and vomiting for 3 days. Imaging revealed small bowel obstruction with a transition point at a suspicious mass in the distal ileum mimicking carcinoid tumors. She underwent an uneventful laparoscopic resection of this mass with primary bowel anastomosis. Histopathology of the resected mass revealed immature myeloid cells that stained positive for myeloperoxidase and CD34/CD117, in keeping with a small bowel MS. A bone marrow examination was negative for concurrent AML. Cytogenetic analysis revealed MYH11/CBFB fusion and an inversion 16 chromosomal aberration which are rarely associated with myeloid disorders. The patient was commenced on systemic chemotherapy to achieve remission and prevent progression to AML. The literature is reviewed, and all cases of small bowel MS are presented in this report. Non-leukemic small bowel MS is an exceptional presentation. We described a case of isolated enteric MS, which was associated with a rare MYH11/CBFB fusion and inversion 16 chromosomal aberration. The diagnosis of small bowel MS can be extremely challenging due to the rarity of the disease and non-specific nature of clinical and radiological features. A histopathological examination with immunohistochemistry staining is imperative to establish an accurate diagnosis. Isolated small bowel MS deserves special attention as it warrants systemic chemotherapy to prevent transformation into AML.
{"title":"Isolated Enteric Myeloid Sarcoma as a Rare Etiology of Small Bowel Obstruction in a Young Female Patient","authors":"N. Abou-Ghanem, Eltaib A Saad, I. Oliff, A. Gidron, D. Filipiuk","doi":"10.14740/gr1481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1481","url":null,"abstract":"Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is an extra-medullary solid tumor consisting of myeloid blasts or immature myeloid cells. MS is usually associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other myeloproliferative neoplasms or myelodysplastic disorders. Isolated MS is a rare clinical entity, and the small bowel is a rare phenomenon for the occurrence of MS. A 30-year-old African American female patient with a past medical history of asthma presented with acute abdominal pain and vomiting for 3 days. Imaging revealed small bowel obstruction with a transition point at a suspicious mass in the distal ileum mimicking carcinoid tumors. She underwent an uneventful laparoscopic resection of this mass with primary bowel anastomosis. Histopathology of the resected mass revealed immature myeloid cells that stained positive for myeloperoxidase and CD34/CD117, in keeping with a small bowel MS. A bone marrow examination was negative for concurrent AML. Cytogenetic analysis revealed MYH11/CBFB fusion and an inversion 16 chromosomal aberration which are rarely associated with myeloid disorders. The patient was commenced on systemic chemotherapy to achieve remission and prevent progression to AML. The literature is reviewed, and all cases of small bowel MS are presented in this report. Non-leukemic small bowel MS is an exceptional presentation. We described a case of isolated enteric MS, which was associated with a rare MYH11/CBFB fusion and inversion 16 chromosomal aberration. The diagnosis of small bowel MS can be extremely challenging due to the rarity of the disease and non-specific nature of clinical and radiological features. A histopathological examination with immunohistochemistry staining is imperative to establish an accurate diagnosis. Isolated small bowel MS deserves special attention as it warrants systemic chemotherapy to prevent transformation into AML.","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"39 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46101229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}