Pub Date : 2026-01-04DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01703-w
Wenke Li, Mo Cheng, Hongyan Han, Menghui Xu, Yiqiao Luo, Feng Bi, Ming Liu
Gastric cancer remains a major clinical challenge owing to its insidious onset and marked heterogeneity, which contribute to poor prognosis and limit the effectiveness of chemotherapy‑based systemic therapy. Antibody‑drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver potent cytotoxins to tumor cells with antigen specificity and have emerged as a therapeutic class that can enhance efficacy while reducing off‑target toxicity. Recent trials of ADCs targeting HER2, CLDN18.2, TROP2, CEACAM5/6, and HER3 demonstrate substantial therapeutic activity. Notably, the HER2‑directed agents trastuzumab deruxtecan and disitamab vedotin have improved survival and response in previously treated advanced disease. ADCs targeting CLDN18.2 and TROP2 have also yielded encouraging early results. Accumulating evidence from ongoing programs indicates movement into earlier lines of therapy in advanced gastric cancer, including evaluation in first‑line combination regimens. Broader clinical use has highlighted resistance mechanisms, including antigen loss or heterogeneity, impaired internalization and lysosomal processing, increased drug efflux, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that limits delivery. This review synthesizes clinical advances in ADC therapy for gastric cancer, delineates resistance biology, and evaluates strategies to overcome therapeutic resistance. Deeper mechanistic insight, biomarker‑guided patient selection, and continued innovation in targets, linkers, payloads, and rational combinations will be critical to overcome resistance and improve outcomes for patients with gastric cancer.
{"title":"Antibody-drug conjugates in gastric cancer: clinical advances and resistance mechanisms.","authors":"Wenke Li, Mo Cheng, Hongyan Han, Menghui Xu, Yiqiao Luo, Feng Bi, Ming Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01703-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01703-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer remains a major clinical challenge owing to its insidious onset and marked heterogeneity, which contribute to poor prognosis and limit the effectiveness of chemotherapy‑based systemic therapy. Antibody‑drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver potent cytotoxins to tumor cells with antigen specificity and have emerged as a therapeutic class that can enhance efficacy while reducing off‑target toxicity. Recent trials of ADCs targeting HER2, CLDN18.2, TROP2, CEACAM5/6, and HER3 demonstrate substantial therapeutic activity. Notably, the HER2‑directed agents trastuzumab deruxtecan and disitamab vedotin have improved survival and response in previously treated advanced disease. ADCs targeting CLDN18.2 and TROP2 have also yielded encouraging early results. Accumulating evidence from ongoing programs indicates movement into earlier lines of therapy in advanced gastric cancer, including evaluation in first‑line combination regimens. Broader clinical use has highlighted resistance mechanisms, including antigen loss or heterogeneity, impaired internalization and lysosomal processing, increased drug efflux, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that limits delivery. This review synthesizes clinical advances in ADC therapy for gastric cancer, delineates resistance biology, and evaluates strategies to overcome therapeutic resistance. Deeper mechanistic insight, biomarker‑guided patient selection, and continued innovation in targets, linkers, payloads, and rational combinations will be critical to overcome resistance and improve outcomes for patients with gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: A fibrotic tumor microenvironment (TME) promotes tumor progression by the interactions between tumor cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the extracellular matrix (ECM), which enhance tumor cell survival and growth, and by suppressing antitumor immunity. However, how characteristic gene expression and amplification in cancer cells drive the formation of a fibrotic TME in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unclear.
Methods: We performed genomic and transcriptomic analyses via datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Asian Cancer Research Group to identify amplified and overexpressed genes associated with the presence of a fibrotic TME in tumors. Syngeneic mouse models of GC and multiplexed immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used to validate the findings of the transcriptomic analysis and investigate the underlying mechanisms.
Results: The Frizzled class receptor 1 (FZD1) gene was frequently amplified and highly expressed in GC patients with fibrotic tumors, and FZD1 expression was related to a poor prognosis. The overexpression of Fzd1 in murine GC tumor cells was significantly associated with enhanced tumor fibrosis and growth and reduced infiltration of CD3+ lymphocytes and CD8+ T cells into tumors. SLIT2 secretion was increased in Fzd1-overexpressing tumor cells via the canonical WNT-β-catenin pathway, and SLIT2 activated CAFs to produce more ECM through the SLIT2‒ROBO1 axis.
Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of FZD1 as a biomarker for predicting fibrotic status in patients with GC and the SLIT2‒ROBO1 axis as a therapeutic target to reverse a fibrotic and immunosuppressive TME.
{"title":"Frizzled-1 amplification promotes fibrosis in the gastric tumor microenvironment through the activation of fibroblasts via the SLIT2/ROBO1 axis.","authors":"Yilin Tong, Takashi Semba, Akiho Nishimura, Atsuko Yonemura, Masaya Yamazaki, Huaitao Wang, Lingfeng Fu, Yuya Okamoto, Takahiro Shoda, Takuya Tajiri, Masami Yamamoto, Tetsuya Tsukamoto, Sachiyo Nomura, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Takatsugu Ishimoto","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01701-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01701-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A fibrotic tumor microenvironment (TME) promotes tumor progression by the interactions between tumor cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the extracellular matrix (ECM), which enhance tumor cell survival and growth, and by suppressing antitumor immunity. However, how characteristic gene expression and amplification in cancer cells drive the formation of a fibrotic TME in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed genomic and transcriptomic analyses via datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Asian Cancer Research Group to identify amplified and overexpressed genes associated with the presence of a fibrotic TME in tumors. Syngeneic mouse models of GC and multiplexed immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used to validate the findings of the transcriptomic analysis and investigate the underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Frizzled class receptor 1 (FZD1) gene was frequently amplified and highly expressed in GC patients with fibrotic tumors, and FZD1 expression was related to a poor prognosis. The overexpression of Fzd1 in murine GC tumor cells was significantly associated with enhanced tumor fibrosis and growth and reduced infiltration of CD3<sup>+</sup> lymphocytes and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells into tumors. SLIT2 secretion was increased in Fzd1-overexpressing tumor cells via the canonical WNT-β-catenin pathway, and SLIT2 activated CAFs to produce more ECM through the SLIT2‒ROBO1 axis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential of FZD1 as a biomarker for predicting fibrotic status in patients with GC and the SLIT2‒ROBO1 axis as a therapeutic target to reverse a fibrotic and immunosuppressive TME.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-03DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01706-7
Seong-Eun Kim, Hyung-Don Kim, Meesun Moon, Jaewon Hyung, Jungeun Ma, Hyungeun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu
Background: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) from gastric cancer is rare but carries a poor prognosis, and its risk factors and clinical presentation remain unclear.
Methods: Among 3850 patients treated with palliative chemotherapy, those with pathologically or cytologically confirmed LMC were included. Responsiveness to intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX) was defined as a malignant cell count < 1/μL on ≥ 2 consecutive cerebrospinal fluid analyses. Survival outcomes were compared across subgroups with different clinical presentations.
Results: During a median follow-up of 13.7 months, LMC was diagnosed in 0.8% (32/3850) of patients. At the time of LMC diagnosis, 27 patients were undergoing palliative systemic chemotherapy, 4 were diagnosed with recurrence following curative surgery, and 1 was diagnosed with the initial presentation of metastatic gastric cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) and/or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PD) was the most relevant risk factor for LMC (adjusted odds ratio 4.78; p = 0.036). Thirty patients received IT-MTX, with responders (n = 23) showing longer overall survival (OS) than non-responders (n = 7) (p = 0.004). Among the 29 patients with available data on extracranial disease control, those with controlled extracranial disease at LMC diagnosis (n = 19) demonstrated significantly better OS following IT-MTX than those with progressive extracranial disease (n = 10) (p = 0.023).
Conclusions: SRC and/or PD is a key risk factor for LMC, which often arises despite controlled extracranial disease, necessitating early evaluation for neurologic symptoms. Survival outcomes depend on IT-MTX response and the status of extracranial disease.
{"title":"Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer.","authors":"Seong-Eun Kim, Hyung-Don Kim, Meesun Moon, Jaewon Hyung, Jungeun Ma, Hyungeun Lee, Min-Hee Ryu","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01706-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01706-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) from gastric cancer is rare but carries a poor prognosis, and its risk factors and clinical presentation remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 3850 patients treated with palliative chemotherapy, those with pathologically or cytologically confirmed LMC were included. Responsiveness to intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX) was defined as a malignant cell count < 1/μL on ≥ 2 consecutive cerebrospinal fluid analyses. Survival outcomes were compared across subgroups with different clinical presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 13.7 months, LMC was diagnosed in 0.8% (32/3850) of patients. At the time of LMC diagnosis, 27 patients were undergoing palliative systemic chemotherapy, 4 were diagnosed with recurrence following curative surgery, and 1 was diagnosed with the initial presentation of metastatic gastric cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) and/or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PD) was the most relevant risk factor for LMC (adjusted odds ratio 4.78; p = 0.036). Thirty patients received IT-MTX, with responders (n = 23) showing longer overall survival (OS) than non-responders (n = 7) (p = 0.004). Among the 29 patients with available data on extracranial disease control, those with controlled extracranial disease at LMC diagnosis (n = 19) demonstrated significantly better OS following IT-MTX than those with progressive extracranial disease (n = 10) (p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SRC and/or PD is a key risk factor for LMC, which often arises despite controlled extracranial disease, necessitating early evaluation for neurologic symptoms. Survival outcomes depend on IT-MTX response and the status of extracranial disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study assessed the impact of an institutional certification system that was newly introduced by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association on short-term surgical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using data from the National Clinical Database.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. The institutions were classified into three categories: type A, type B, and non-certified institutions, in decreasing order of certification stringency. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome was surgery-related mortality. Logistic regression with risk adjustment, estimated using generalized estimating equations, was used to account for intra-cluster correlation.
Results: There was no significant difference in the risks of distal gastrectomy-related complications across the three institution types. However, type A- (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.49) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71) had a significantly lower mortality risk than non-certified ones. On the other hand, Type A- (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and type B-certified institutions (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) had higher risks of postoperative total gastrectomy-related complications than non-certified ones. Nevertheless, type A- (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) had significantly lower surgery-related mortality risks than non-certified ones.
Conclusions: Certified institutions demonstrated lower surgical mortality risks, highlighting the benefits of the certification system and the importance of institutional quality.
背景:本研究使用来自国家临床数据库的数据,评估了日本胃癌协会新引入的机构认证系统对胃癌患者短期手术结果的影响。方法:对2020年1月至2022年12月期间进行的远端胃切除术和全胃切除术进行回顾性队列研究。按照认证严格程度的递减顺序,将这些机构分为A类、B类和非认证机构。根据Clavien-Dindo分类系统,主要观察≥IIIa级术后并发症的发生率。次要结果是手术相关死亡率。使用广义估计方程估计带有风险调整的逻辑回归来解释簇内相关性。结果:在三种机构类型中,远端胃切除术相关并发症的风险无显著差异。然而,A型(优势比(OR) 0.39, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.31-0.49)和b型认证机构(OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71)的死亡风险显著低于非认证机构。另一方面,A-型(OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44)和b型(OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33)认证机构发生全胃切除术相关并发症的风险高于非认证机构。然而,A-型(OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58)和b -型(OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88)认证的i型机构的手术相关死亡风险明显低于非认证机构。结论:认证机构显示出较低的手术死亡率风险,突出了认证制度的好处和机构质量的重要性。
{"title":"Comparative study of the short-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery between Japanese Gastric cancer association-certified and non-certified institutions: a retrospective cohort analysis using a national database in Japan.","authors":"Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Hideki Endo, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Koshi Kumagai, Shingo Kanaji, Hisato Kawakami, Chika Kusano, Ryoji Kushima, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro, Kensei Yamaguchi, Takaki Yoshikawa, Yuichiro Doki, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01694-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10120-025-01694-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the impact of an institutional certification system that was newly introduced by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association on short-term surgical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using data from the National Clinical Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. The institutions were classified into three categories: type A, type B, and non-certified institutions, in decreasing order of certification stringency. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome was surgery-related mortality. Logistic regression with risk adjustment, estimated using generalized estimating equations, was used to account for intra-cluster correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the risks of distal gastrectomy-related complications across the three institution types. However, type A- (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.49) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71) had a significantly lower mortality risk than non-certified ones. On the other hand, Type A- (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and type B-certified institutions (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) had higher risks of postoperative total gastrectomy-related complications than non-certified ones. Nevertheless, type A- (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) had significantly lower surgery-related mortality risks than non-certified ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Certified institutions demonstrated lower surgical mortality risks, highlighting the benefits of the certification system and the importance of institutional quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01699-3
Sung-Hoon Byun, Tae-Se Kim, Soomin Ahn, Yang Won Min, Hyuk Lee, Byung-Hoon Min, Jun Haeng Lee, Poong-Lyul Rhee
Background: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a rare but highly lethal manifestation of gastric cancer. We sought to describe its clinical features and define prognostic factors in a large single-center cohort.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients diagnosed with LMC secondary to gastric cancer at Samsung Medical Center between 2008 and 2024.
Results: The median interval from primary gastric cancer diagnosis to LMC development was 12.0 months (range, 0-106). Common presenting symptoms included headache (73.3%), nausea/vomiting (55.8%), and dizziness (48.8%). Primary gastric cancers were predominantly Borrmann type III (48.2%) or type IV (38.8%) and had an undifferentiated-type (96.5%) histology. Intrathecal (IT) methotrexate-based chemotherapy was administered to 54 patients (62.8%), with or without radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy. Cytological response was seen in 14/54 patients (25.9%) who received IT chemotherapy. Decompressive therapies, including Ommaya reservoir, external ventricular drainage (EVD) and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt were performed in 71/86 patients (82.6%). The median overall survival from LMC diagnosis was 6.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7-8.3). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 60 years (HR 1.8) and ECOG PS > 2 (HR 2.8) were independent adverse prognostic factors. Univariable subgroup analyses demonstrated prolonged survival with intrathecal chemotherapy (HR 0.5), systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.4), and decompressive procedures (HR 0.3), whereas radiotherapy showed no significant benefit.
Conclusions: The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with LMC remains extremely poor, and older age and poor performance status were independent adverse prognostic factors. As intrathecal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and decompressive therapies may improve survival, an individualized, multidisciplinary treatment approach is recommended.
{"title":"Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis of 86 cases.","authors":"Sung-Hoon Byun, Tae-Se Kim, Soomin Ahn, Yang Won Min, Hyuk Lee, Byung-Hoon Min, Jun Haeng Lee, Poong-Lyul Rhee","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01699-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01699-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a rare but highly lethal manifestation of gastric cancer. We sought to describe its clinical features and define prognostic factors in a large single-center cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients diagnosed with LMC secondary to gastric cancer at Samsung Medical Center between 2008 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median interval from primary gastric cancer diagnosis to LMC development was 12.0 months (range, 0-106). Common presenting symptoms included headache (73.3%), nausea/vomiting (55.8%), and dizziness (48.8%). Primary gastric cancers were predominantly Borrmann type III (48.2%) or type IV (38.8%) and had an undifferentiated-type (96.5%) histology. Intrathecal (IT) methotrexate-based chemotherapy was administered to 54 patients (62.8%), with or without radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy. Cytological response was seen in 14/54 patients (25.9%) who received IT chemotherapy. Decompressive therapies, including Ommaya reservoir, external ventricular drainage (EVD) and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt were performed in 71/86 patients (82.6%). The median overall survival from LMC diagnosis was 6.0 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7-8.3). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 60 years (HR 1.8) and ECOG PS > 2 (HR 2.8) were independent adverse prognostic factors. Univariable subgroup analyses demonstrated prolonged survival with intrathecal chemotherapy (HR 0.5), systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.4), and decompressive procedures (HR 0.3), whereas radiotherapy showed no significant benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with LMC remains extremely poor, and older age and poor performance status were independent adverse prognostic factors. As intrathecal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and decompressive therapies may improve survival, an individualized, multidisciplinary treatment approach is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145707852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In late-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), evidence supporting the use of irinotecan in older patients remains limited. We conducted a post-hoc age-subgroup analysis of the phase III RINDBeRG study, which randomized AGC patients previously treated with ramucirumab-based chemotherapy to receive ramucirumab plus irinotecan (RAM + IRI) or irinotecan alone (IRI).
Methods: Patients were classified as elderly (≥ 70 years; n = 83 [RAM + IRI], 80 [IRI]) or non-elderly (< 70 years; n = 117, 113). Efficacy outcomes-including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR)-and safety were compared. Prognostic factors for OS were explored via multivariable Cox regression.
Results: OS and PFS did not differ significantly between age groups. In the RAM + IRI group, median OS was 9.7 vs. 8.9 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.15), and PFS was 4.0 vs. 3.6 months (HR 0.84, CI 0.63-1.12). In the IRI group, OS was 8.5 months in both groups (HR 0.99, CI 0.7-1.34), and PFS was 3.1 vs. 2.2 months (HR 0.87, CI 0.65-1.17). ORRs were 20.5% vs. 14.5% (RAM + IRI) and 18.8% vs. 9.7% (IRI) in elderly vs. non-elderly patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable. Multivariable analysis identified ECOG PS 1, peritoneal metastasis, elevated LDH, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score ≥ 1, and low alkaline phosphatase as poor prognostic factors. Age was not prognostic.
Conclusions: Irinotecan-based therapy offers comparable efficacy and tolerability in older and younger patients with refractory AGC.
背景:在晚期胃癌(AGC)的晚期治疗中,支持伊立替康在老年患者中使用的证据仍然有限。我们对RINDBeRG III期研究进行了一项事后年龄亚组分析,该研究将先前接受ramucirumab为基础的化疗的AGC患者随机分组,接受ramucirumab加伊立替康(RAM + IRI)或伊立替康单独(IRI)治疗。方法:将患者分为老年(≥70岁,n = 83 [RAM + IRI], 80 [IRI])和非老年(结果:OS和PFS在年龄组间无显著差异)。在RAM + IRI组中,中位OS为9.7 vs 8.9个月(风险比[HR] 0.85, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.63-1.15), PFS为4.0 vs 3.6个月(HR 0.84, CI 0.63-1.12)。IRI组两组的OS均为8.5个月(HR 0.99, CI 0.7-1.34), PFS分别为3.1个月和2.2个月(HR 0.87, CI 0.65-1.17)。老年和非老年患者的orr分别为20.5%和14.5% (RAM + IRI)和18.8%和9.7% (IRI)。≥3级不良事件具有可比性。多变量分析发现ECOG ps1、腹膜转移、LDH升高、改良格拉斯哥预后评分≥1、碱性磷酸酶低为不良预后因素。年龄不是预测因素。结论:伊立替康为基础的治疗在老年和年轻难治性AGC患者中具有相当的疗效和耐受性。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of irinotecan-based therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving third-line or later chemotherapy: post-hoc age-subgroup analysis of the rindberg trial.","authors":"Ryohei Kawabata, Daisuke Sakai, Toshio Shimokawa, Rika Kizawa, Toru Ishiguro, Hiroki Yukami, Shogen Boku, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Shunji Endo, Toshimasa Tsujinaka, Taroh Satoh","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01692-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01692-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In late-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), evidence supporting the use of irinotecan in older patients remains limited. We conducted a post-hoc age-subgroup analysis of the phase III RINDBeRG study, which randomized AGC patients previously treated with ramucirumab-based chemotherapy to receive ramucirumab plus irinotecan (RAM + IRI) or irinotecan alone (IRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were classified as elderly (≥ 70 years; n = 83 [RAM + IRI], 80 [IRI]) or non-elderly (< 70 years; n = 117, 113). Efficacy outcomes-including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR)-and safety were compared. Prognostic factors for OS were explored via multivariable Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS and PFS did not differ significantly between age groups. In the RAM + IRI group, median OS was 9.7 vs. 8.9 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.15), and PFS was 4.0 vs. 3.6 months (HR 0.84, CI 0.63-1.12). In the IRI group, OS was 8.5 months in both groups (HR 0.99, CI 0.7-1.34), and PFS was 3.1 vs. 2.2 months (HR 0.87, CI 0.65-1.17). ORRs were 20.5% vs. 14.5% (RAM + IRI) and 18.8% vs. 9.7% (IRI) in elderly vs. non-elderly patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable. Multivariable analysis identified ECOG PS 1, peritoneal metastasis, elevated LDH, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score ≥ 1, and low alkaline phosphatase as poor prognostic factors. Age was not prognostic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Irinotecan-based therapy offers comparable efficacy and tolerability in older and younger patients with refractory AGC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145668162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a major contributor to poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer (GC), yet its molecular mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. The results of bioinformatic analysis and clinical sample validation reveal that LncRNA MZF1-AS1 is significantly upregulated in GC tissues, particularly in peritoneal metastases, and is associated with worse overall and post-progression survival. MZF1-AS1 enhances malignant phenotypes and PM of GC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, RAB13 is demonstrated as a functional effector of MZF1-AS1 via RNA-seq. MZF1-AS1 enhances RAB13 expression by promoting its mRNA stability, thereby facilitating GC cell proliferation, EMT, migration, invasion, and stemness. Further, RNA pulldown and Mass Spectrometry reveal that MZF1-AS1 directly binds to NSUN2. MZF1-AS1 strengthens the interaction between NSUN2 and RAB13 mRNA, promoting NSUN2-mediated m5C modification and stabilizing RAB13 mRNA. Our findings uncover a novel epi-transcriptomic mechanism by which MZF1-AS1 promotes GC progression via NSUN2-dependent m5C methylation of RAB13 mRNA, offering new insights into PM pathogenesis and highlighting potential therapeutic targets for advanced GC.
{"title":"MZF1-AS1/NSUN2 promotes the peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer by enhancing the stability of RAB13 mRNA.","authors":"Qi Zhang, Ruihong Zhang, Luguang Liu, Ying Shen, Xiaoning Huo, Yanhui Nan, Xiaoli Zhang, Jie Chai, Jing Hao","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01690-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01690-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a major contributor to poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer (GC), yet its molecular mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. The results of bioinformatic analysis and clinical sample validation reveal that LncRNA MZF1-AS1 is significantly upregulated in GC tissues, particularly in peritoneal metastases, and is associated with worse overall and post-progression survival. MZF1-AS1 enhances malignant phenotypes and PM of GC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, RAB13 is demonstrated as a functional effector of MZF1-AS1 via RNA-seq. MZF1-AS1 enhances RAB13 expression by promoting its mRNA stability, thereby facilitating GC cell proliferation, EMT, migration, invasion, and stemness. Further, RNA pulldown and Mass Spectrometry reveal that MZF1-AS1 directly binds to NSUN2. MZF1-AS1 strengthens the interaction between NSUN2 and RAB13 mRNA, promoting NSUN2-mediated m5C modification and stabilizing RAB13 mRNA. Our findings uncover a novel epi-transcriptomic mechanism by which MZF1-AS1 promotes GC progression via NSUN2-dependent m5C methylation of RAB13 mRNA, offering new insights into PM pathogenesis and highlighting potential therapeutic targets for advanced GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique has promise for preventing reflux after proximal gastrectomy. However, a short esophageal remnant sometimes strongly complicates the transhiatal procedure for alimentary tract reconstruction. We therefore developed secure robotic techniques for right transthoracic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique. To accomplish valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by this double flap technique in the right thorax of patients in the prone position, the esophagus and stomach were partially fixed before rotating these two organs to expose the anterior gastric wall side for anastomosis because it was invisible in the right thorax. However, this rotation process was complicated. Doubting that the required anastomosis that was conventionally created in the layout of the ventral esophagus and dorsal stomach in valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique protected against reflux, we have considered that, if the anastomosis is created at the posterior gastric wall, it may not be necessary to rotate the remnant esophagus and stomach. We herein describe a modified robotic procedure for right transthoracic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy incorporating a double flap technique. In this procedure, the anastomosis is created at the posterior remnant gastric wall under a natural operative view without re-arranging the anastomotic organs. This modified technique simplifies right transthoracic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique without adversely influencing anti-acid reflux mechanisms.
{"title":"Reverse layout of the remnant esophagus and stomach during right transthoracic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy in robotic esophagogastric junctional cancer surgery.","authors":"Hirokazu Noshiro, Yukie Yoda, Kazuki Higure, Tomokazu Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01682-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01682-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique has promise for preventing reflux after proximal gastrectomy. However, a short esophageal remnant sometimes strongly complicates the transhiatal procedure for alimentary tract reconstruction. We therefore developed secure robotic techniques for right transthoracic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique. To accomplish valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by this double flap technique in the right thorax of patients in the prone position, the esophagus and stomach were partially fixed before rotating these two organs to expose the anterior gastric wall side for anastomosis because it was invisible in the right thorax. However, this rotation process was complicated. Doubting that the required anastomosis that was conventionally created in the layout of the ventral esophagus and dorsal stomach in valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique protected against reflux, we have considered that, if the anastomosis is created at the posterior gastric wall, it may not be necessary to rotate the remnant esophagus and stomach. We herein describe a modified robotic procedure for right transthoracic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy incorporating a double flap technique. In this procedure, the anastomosis is created at the posterior remnant gastric wall under a natural operative view without re-arranging the anastomotic organs. This modified technique simplifies right transthoracic valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy by a double flap technique without adversely influencing anti-acid reflux mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}