Heart Failure Reviews最新文献

Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic with a growing prevalence and is a growing burden on the healthcare system. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to revolutionize medicine and can be applied in many different forms to aid in the prevention of symptomatic HF (stage C). HF prevention currently has several challenges, specifically in the detection of pre-HF (stage B). HF events are missed in contemporary models, limited therapeutic options are proven to prevent HF, and the prevention of HF with preserved ejection is particularly lacking. ML has the potential to overcome these challenges through existing and future models. ML has limitations, but the many benefits of ML outweigh these limitations and risks in most scenarios. ML can be applied in HF prevention through various strategies such as refinement of incident HF risk prediction models, capturing diagnostic signs from available tests such as electrocardiograms, chest x-rays, or echocardiograms to identify structural/functional cardiac abnormalities suggestive of pre-HF (stage B HF), and interpretation of biomarkers and epigenetic data. Altogether, ML is able to expand the screening of individuals at risk for HF (stage A HF), identify populations with pre-HF (stage B HF), predict the risk of incident stage C HF events, and offer the ability to intervene early to prevent progression to or decline in stage C HF. In this narrative review, we discuss the methods by which ML is utilized in HF prevention, the benefits and pitfalls of ML in HF risk prediction, and the future directions.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents an entity with complex pathophysiologic pathways, among which coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is believed to be an important orchestrator. Research in the field of CMD has highlighted impaired vasoreactivity, capillary rarefaction, and inflammation as potential mediators of its development. CMD can be diagnosed via several noninvasive methods including transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography. Moreover, invasive methods such as coronary flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance are commonly employed in the assessment of CMD. As far as the association between CMD and HFpEF is concerned, numerous studies have highlighted the coexistence of CMD in the majority of HFpEF patients. Additionally, patients affected by both conditions may be facing an adverse prognosis. Finally, there is limited evidence suggesting a beneficial effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, ranolazine, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in CMD, with further evidence being awaited regarding the impact of other pharmacotherapies such as anti-inflammatory agents.

This focused review will highlight the results of HELIOS-B, the first randomized outcomes trial evaluating a gene silencing treatment for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). In HELIOS-B, vutrisiran was tested against placebo and demonstrated a 28% reduction in the composite of all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events. Additionally, there were clinically significant benefits on the 6-min walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and NYHA class. Discontinuation rates and adverse events were similar between treatment and control arms, suggesting that vutrisiran is well tolerated. In this review, these promising results are explored and compared with other treatment trials in ATTR-CM.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease worldwide and may present with or without dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Significant advances have been made in the management of obstructive HCM. On the other hand, despite their significant symptomatic burden, patients with non-obstructive HCM (nHCM) (i.e., without LVOTO) still do not have evidence-based therapeutical options. The recent IMPROVE-HCM study, a phase 2 randomized, double-blinded trial, aims to place a first step in filling this gap in knowledge. The study assessed the safety (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint) of ninerafaxstat, a novel cardiac mitotrope drug that increases adenosine triphosphate production. We highlighted the main findings of the trial, contextualizing these results within the larger landscape of completed and ongoing trials in nHCM.

With over 1 million primary heart failure (HF) hospitalizations annually, nearly 80% of patients who present to the emergency department with decompensated HF (DHF) are hospitalized. Short stay units (SSU) present an alternative to hospitalization, yet the effectiveness of the SSU strategy of care is not well known. This study is to determine the effectiveness of a SSU strategy compared with hospitalization in lower-risk patients with DHF. Our primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality and re-hospitalization. Key secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and re-hospitalization, costs, and 30-day days-alive-and-out-of-hospital (DAOOH). This is a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched from inception through February 2024. Either randomized trials or comparative observational studies were included if they compared outcomes between low-risk ED DHF patients admitted to an SSU (defined as an observation unit with expected stay ≤ 48 h) vs. admitted to the hospital. Two authors independently screened all titles and abstracts and then identified full texts for inclusion. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed by two authors in parallel. The primary outcome was a composite of death or readmission within 30 days, reported as relative risk (RR), where a RR < 1 favored the SSU strategy. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and re-hospitalization, costs, and 1-month days-alive-and-out-of-hospital (DAOOH). Of the 467 articles identified by our search strategy, only 3 full text articles were included. In meta-analysis for the primary outcome of 30-day death or readmission, the RR was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.56 to 1.63; I² = 0%) for patients randomized to SSU vs hospitalization (2 studies, 241 patients). There were only 2 total deaths at 30 days in the 2 studies (total N = 258) which reported 30-day mortality, both in hospitalized patients. Only one study reported 90-day outcomes, showing no significant differences. Costs were lower in the SSU arm from one study, and 30-day DAOOH also favored SSU based on a single randomized trial. Based on very limited evidence, SSU provides similar efficacy for 30-day and 90-day mortality and readmission compared to hospitalization. An SSU strategy appears safe and may be cost effective.

Echocardiography represents an essential tool for imagers and clinical cardiologists in the management of patients with heart failure. Advanced heart failure (AdHF) is a more severe and, typically, later stage of HF that exposes patients to a high risk of adverse outcomes, with a 1-year mortality rate of around 50%. Currently, several therapies are available to improve the outcomes of these patients, reduce their mortality rate, and, possibly, delay the need for advanced therapies such as heart transplant and long-term mechanical circulatory support. When accurately performed and interpreted, echocardiography provides crucial information to properly tailor medical and device therapy of patients with AdHF and to identify those at even higher risk. In this review, we present the state of the art of echocardiography applications in the clinical management of patients with AdHF. We will discuss the role of echocardiography chronologically, beginning with the prediction of AdHF, proceeding through diagnosis, and detailing how echocardiography informs clinical decision-making, before concluding with indications for advanced therapies.

Graphical Abstract

The role of echocardiography in the management of patients with advanced heart failure. Echocardiography is a useful method for predicting the occurrence of AdHF during follow-up of patients with HF (top line). The diagnosis of AdHF requires an echocardiographic criterion for AdHF (middle line). In patients with AdHF, echocardiography is useful to identify patients who will benefit most from medical therapy adjustment, device therapy, and LVAD implantation. HF, heart failure; LA, left atrium; RV, right ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. HF, heart failure; LA, left atrium; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; RV, right ventricle

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is rapidly growing as the most common form of heart failure. Among HFpEF phenotypes, the cardiometabolic/obese HFpEF — HFpEF driven by cardiometabolic alterations — emerges as one of the most prevalent forms of this syndrome and the one on which recent therapeutic success have been made. Indeed, pharmacological approaches with sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have proved to be effective due to metabolic protective effects. Similarly, lifestyle changes, including diet and exercise are crucial in HFpEF management. Increasing evidence supports the important role of diet and physical activity in the pathogenesis, prognosis, and potential reversal of HFpEF. Metabolic derangements and systemic inflammation are key features of HFpEF and represent the main targets of lifestyle interventions. However, the underlying mechanisms of the beneficial effects of these interventions in HFpEF are incompletely understood. Hence, there is an unmet need of tailored lifestyle intervention modalities for patients with HFpEF. Here we present the current available evidence on lifestyle interventions in HFpEF management and therapeutics, discussing their modalities and potential mechanisms.

Background

The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until February 2024 were systematically searched. Given the limited number of randomized studies, propensity score-matched observational studies comparing CA with SMT in AF patients with HFpEF were also included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.

Results

Eight studies that enrolled 17,717 SMT and 2537 CA patients were included. CA was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.85). The risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.83), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22–0.84), and AF recurrence (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.73) were also lower in the CA group.

Conclusion

CA demonstrated significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits compared to SMT in the HFpEF population.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes, and obesity is one of the most common and clinically relevant phenotypes of HFpEF. Obesity contributes to HFpEF through multiple mechanisms, including sodium retention, neurohormonal dysregulation, altered energy substrate metabolism, expansion of visceral adipose tissue, and low-grade systemic inflammation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a hormone in the incretin family. It is produced by specialized cells called neuroendocrine L cells located in the distal ileum and colon. GLP-1 reduces blood glucose levels by promoting glucose-dependent insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells, suppressing glucagon release from pancreatic α cells, and blocking hepatic gluconeogenesis. Recent evidence suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) can significantly improve physical activity limitations and exercise capacity in obese patients with HFpEF. The possible cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs include reducing epicardial fat tissue thickness, preventing activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, improving myocardial energy metabolism, reducing systemic inflammation and cardiac oxidative stress, and delaying the progression of atherosclerosis. This review examines the impact of obesity on the underlying mechanisms of HFpEF, summarizes the trial data on cardiovascular outcomes of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and highlights the potential cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs to give a pathophysiological and clinical rationale for using GLP-1 RAs in obese HFpEF patients.

Advances in the etiological classification of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy (ICM) have reached a consensus. However, the mechanism of myocarditis/ICM remains unclear, which affects the development of treatment and the improvement of outcome. Cellular transcription and metabolic reprogramming, and the interactions between cardiomyocytes and non-cardiomyocytes, such as the immune cells, contribute to the process of myocarditis/ICM. Recent efforts have been made by multi-omics techniques, particularly in single-cell RNA sequencing, to gain a better understanding of the cellular landscape alteration occurring in disease during the progression. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the latest studies in myocarditis/ICM, particularly as revealed by single-cell sequencing.