Heart Failure Reviews最新文献

Right heart catheterization (RHC) provides critical hemodynamic insights by measuring atrial, ventricular, and pulmonary artery pressures, as well as cardiac output (CO). Although the use of RHC has decreased, its application has been linked to improved outcomes. Advanced hemodynamic markers such as cardiac power output (CPO), aortic pulsatility index (API), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (RAP/PCWP) and right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) have been introduced to enhance risk stratification in cardiogenic shock (CS) and end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. CPO has emerged as a potent prognostic tool, with values below 0.6 Watts significantly associated with mortality. Similarly, API and PAPi have demonstrated strong predictive power for adverse outcomes, including death and the need for advanced HF therapies. RAP/PCWP ratio is shown to be a valuable a prognostic tool for RV dysfunction, mortality, and adverse outcomes. Despite mixed evidence on the prognostic utility of RVSWI, its physiologic relevance in assessing right ventricular function remains important. A novel clinical observation, involving patients with an RAP numerically greater than pulmonary artery saturation, was associated with a 71% 30-day mortality rate, underscoring the potential prognostic value of this finding. This review aims to summarize key advanced hemodynamic markers and their role in improving risk stratification and guiding treatment in CS and end-stage HF. The integration of these markers into clinical practice holds the potential to enhance personalized care and improve outcomes for patients with CS and advanced HF.

Heart failure is a prevalent global health issue. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which already represents half of all heart cases worldwide, is projected to further increase, driven by aging populations and rising cardiovascular risk factors. Effective therapies for HFpEF remain limited, particularly due to its pathophysiological heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of underlying pathomechanisms and implications. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterized by structural and functional changes in the coronary microcirculation, is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in HFpEF even though the exact nature of their causal relationship is still unclear. This review explores prevalence, prognostic implications, and potential therapeutic targets for CMD in HFpEF. CMD's role in HFpEF might involve impaired coronary blood flow regulation, leading to myocardial ischemia, impaired relaxation, and/or adverse remodeling. Vice versa, increased wall stress in patients with HFpEF might elevate coronary resistances, further worsening microvascular perfusion. Finally, abnormalities in substrate metabolism might cause both CMD and HFpEF. Current treatments, including pharmacotherapy and device-based therapies, show limited success, highlighting the need for more targeted approaches. New possible therapies, such as the coronary sinus reducer device, may show promise in improving myocardial perfusion and function. However, further large-scale studies are required to elucidate the mechanistic links between CMD and HFpEF and to develop specialized treatments for distinct heart failure phenotypes.

The current paper reports the model organization, level of health care, and type of medical and research activities related to the existing heart failure centers of the Italian Society of Cardiology. Of note, we conduced an internal survey among the members of heart failure working group and related hospital and territorial sites about the quality of care and assistance levels according to the local hospital resources and type of diagnostic therapeutic and management resources. Thirty-two hospital ambulatorial structures have been identified, the centers were equally distributed within the national ground, with similar concentration between north and south regions of the Italian country. We distinguished three different levels of organization: (1) basal territorial clinics in which patients with suspected or already diagnosed heart failure (HF) are initially identified and screened; (2) intermediate clinics in which HF patients can be routinary followed by HF specialists supported by a dedicated staff including imaging and arrythmologist experts, and interventional cardiologist; (3) advanced clinics composed by all the technical and staff resources capable of guarantying repetitive invasive assessment, continuous invasive monitoring, dedicated telemedicine structures focused on more advanced HF management integrated by heart transplantation or mechanical assistance programs. Different type of assistance is supported by a relevant number of research activity primarily conducted by the Italian Society of Cardiology or spontaneous studies arranged by HF specialist members. The number of HF centers has increased over the past few decades in proportion to the progressive rise in HF diagnoses and associated hospitalization. The expansion of ambulatory structures has been facilitated by an increasing socioeconomic and research influence. The quality of HF services in Italy could be raised by improving the network and connections between HF specialists, general practitioners (GPs), caregivers, and other specialists frequently working in this field.

Heart failure (HF) poses a major global health challenge with rising prevalence, significant morbidity and mortality, and substantial associated healthcare costs. With aging of the population and an increasing burden of comorbidities, the complex interplay between cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic risk factors have been thrust into the spotlight and have broadened the traditional focus from HF treatment to an increased emphasis on prevention. In recognition of the evolving HF landscape, the American Heart Association released the PREVENT models which are comprehensive risk assessment tools that estimate 10- and 30-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease and its subtypes, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and, for the first time, HF. While it is an accurate risk estimation tool and represents a step forward in improving risk stratification for primary prevention of HF, there remain several limitations and unknowns like model performance across disaggregated racial and ethnic groups, the role of traditional ASCVD vs. HF-specific risk factors, HF prediction among those with known ASCVD, and the use of traditional regression techniques in lieu of potentially more powerful machine learning-based modeling approaches. Furthermore, it remains unclear how to optimize risk estimation in clinical care. The emergence of multiple novel pharmacological therapies that prevent incident HF, including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), highlights the importance of accurate HF risk prediction. To provide HF prevention with these effective but costly therapies, we must understand the optimal strategy in sequencing and combining these therapies and prioritize patients at highest risk. Such implementation requires both accurate risk stratification and a better understanding of how to communicate risk to patients and providers. This state-of-the-art review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent trends in HF prevention, including risk assessment, care management strategies, and emerging and novel treatments.

This study aimed to identify, assess, and summarize systematic reviews on dietary sodium intake restrictions for patients with heart failure. Literature searches were conducted on Pubmed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wanfang Database up to January 2024. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using the quality assessment tool from the Australian JBI Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (2016). The results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were synthesized and presented according to different outcome indicators. Nine systematic reviews were included in this study. The current evidence does not support the fact that dietary sodium intake restrictions for patients with heart failure have a positive impact on mortality rates, rehospitalization rates, and quality of life. Conversely, strict dietary sodium intake restrictions (≤ 2000 mg/day) may increase the risk of death, rehospitalization, and symptom exacerbation. Dietary sodium intake restriction may not have a positive impact on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. Nevertheless, more evidence is required to explore the differences in the impact of various levels of dietary sodium restriction on the outcomes and symptom management indicators of patients with heart failure.

This focused review will highlight the results of HELIOS-B, the first randomized outcomes trial evaluating a gene silencing treatment for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM). In HELIOS-B, vutrisiran was tested against placebo and demonstrated a 28% reduction in the composite of all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events. Additionally, there were clinically significant benefits on the 6-min walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and NYHA class. Discontinuation rates and adverse events were similar between treatment and control arms, suggesting that vutrisiran is well tolerated. In this review, these promising results are explored and compared with other treatment trials in ATTR-CM.

Cardiomyopathies (CMP) are a diverse group of myocardial diseases that cause structural, functional, and pathological changes to the heart. Alterations at the molecular level associated with the clinical phenotype and progression of CMPs cannot be solely explained by the genetic mutations, even in inherited cardiomyopathies. Epigenetics and environmental factors are likely to significantly modify the clinical manifestations of CMPs, resulting in variable clinical expression and different age-related penetrance. This review examines the role of dysfunctional DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodelling, and noncoding RNAs in the development and exacerbation of CMPs, highlighting their potential as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets, including the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Additionally, it explores how environmental exposures can influence epigenetic changes and potentially be used for preventive strategies and personalized care in CMP patients. Monozygotic twin studies and intergenerational studies are discussed as valuable tools for understanding the interplay between genetics, epigenetics, and environmental factors. Lastly, this review addresses current challenges and future perspectives, such as the need for greater specificity in epigenetic therapies, minimizing off-target effects, and investigating sex differences in CMP research and treatment.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) presents a challenge in clinical practice due to its complexity and impact on morbidity and mortality. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) was to evaluate the value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP in predicting overall adverse outcomes, cardiovascular events, and mortality, in patients with HFpEF. This SR/MA included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the use of BNP and NT-proBNP as prognostic biomarkers for adverse outcomes in HFpEF patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google, without language restrictions, from inception until June 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Twenty-two studies involving 10,158 HFpEF patients were included. The analysis showed that BNP is a significant predictor of overall adverse events in HFpEF patients, with an overall HR of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.20-1.52). Similarly, BNP was a significant predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in HFpEF patients with a HR of 1.36 (95% CI 1.12-1.64) and HR of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.04-1.84), respectively. When analyzing data for NT-proBNP predictive potential, 3 studies confirmed that NT-proBNP is a significant independent prognostic indicator for adverse events, with an overall HR of 1.80 (95% CI: 1.38-2.35). Comparable results were seen for mortality, with higher NT-proBNP levels associated with increased mortality risk and the MA showing a HR of 1.65 (95% CI: 1.55-1.76). This systematic review highlights the valuable prognostic role of BNP and NT-proBNP in predicting overall adverse outcome, cardiovascular events, and mortality in HFpEF patients. Our findings underscore the importance of further research to establish standardized thresholds and investigate BNP and NT-proBNP's potential in predicting morbidity and mortality.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors provide cardiovascular and kidney benefits to patients with heart failure (HF) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD), regardless of diabetes status and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Despite robust data demonstrating the efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors in both ambulatory and hospital settings, real-world evidence suggests slow and varied adoption of SGLT2 inhibitors among patients hospitalized for HF. Barriers to implementation of SGLT2i may include clinicians' concerns regarding potential adverse events such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), volume depletion, and symptomatic hypoglycemia; or concerns regarding physiologically expected reductions in eGFR. Guidelines lack specific, practical safety data and definitive recommendations regarding in-hospital initiation and continuation of SGLT2i in patients hospitalized with HF. In this review, we discuss the safety of in-hospital SGLT2 inhibitor initiation based on recent trials and highlight the clinical implications of their early use in patients hospitalized for HF.