Giorgio de Stefano, Nunzia Farella, Umberto Scognamiglio, Giulia Liorre, Giosuele Calabria, Tiziana Ascione, Antonio Giorgio, Valentina Iodice
Background/aims: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of sorafenib after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methodology: 44 intermediate or advanced HCC patients received sorafenib treatment after debulking with RFA therapy. Time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), duration of sorafenib treatment and adverse effects were evaluated. An explorative comparison was performed with patients treated with sorafenib only.
Results: At 12 months, TTP was 10.3 months (range: 1-32). RR was 61% with 2 complete responses, and duration of sorafenib therapy was 10.9 months (1-32). No new safety concerns were report-ed. With sorafenib only, TTP was 7.2 months (range: 0-38) and RR was 40%, with one complete response; duration of therapy was 7.3 months (0-38).
Conclusions: The sequence of RFA and sorafenib appears effective and safe in HCC patients. These findings could support the use of a sequential treatment with RFA and sorafenib in HCC patients.
{"title":"Sorafenib after RFA in HCC patients: a pilot study.","authors":"Giorgio de Stefano, Nunzia Farella, Umberto Scognamiglio, Giulia Liorre, Giosuele Calabria, Tiziana Ascione, Antonio Giorgio, Valentina Iodice","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness and safety of sorafenib after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>44 intermediate or advanced HCC patients received sorafenib treatment after debulking with RFA therapy. Time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), duration of sorafenib treatment and adverse effects were evaluated. An explorative comparison was performed with patients treated with sorafenib only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, TTP was 10.3 months (range: 1-32). RR was 61% with 2 complete responses, and duration of sorafenib therapy was 10.9 months (1-32). No new safety concerns were report-ed. With sorafenib only, TTP was 7.2 months (range: 0-38) and RR was 40%, with one complete response; duration of therapy was 7.3 months (0-38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sequence of RFA and sorafenib appears effective and safe in HCC patients. These findings could support the use of a sequential treatment with RFA and sorafenib in HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"261-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33253465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: One major problem with Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the appearance of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma. Diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) provides hyperintense signals in cases of cancer. DWIBS and T2 image fusion (DWIBS/T2) provides functional information in anatomical settings, and is useful for the detection of cancer with strong contrast against surrounding tissues. DWIBS/T2 signals were analyzed in patients with IPMN to investigate positive or negative results.
Methodology: Patient records were analyzed retrospectively regarding IPMN. None showed high-risk stigmata or worrisome features. To rule out T2 shine-through or differentiate malignant lesions from non-malignant causes of restricted diffusion, positive ADC maps were produced from the recorded ADC values.
Results: None of the patients with IPMN had features of malignant progression. No mural nodules were detected by endoscopic ultrasonography. IPMN was hyperintense with DWIBS/T2 and the ADC map. This finding suggested that the hyperintense values of IPMN were T2 shine-through. These results showed that none of the IPMNs were positive with DWIBS/T2.
Conclusion: DWIBS/T2 was negative for patients with IPMN. DWIBS/T2 might be useful for the evaluation of malignant progression, in addition to observation.
{"title":"Diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion is negative for patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.","authors":"Minoru Tomizawa, Fuminobu Shinozaki, Yasufumi Motoyoshi, Takao Sugiyama, Shigenori Yamamoto, Naoki Ishige","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>One major problem with Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is the appearance of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma. Diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) provides hyperintense signals in cases of cancer. DWIBS and T2 image fusion (DWIBS/T2) provides functional information in anatomical settings, and is useful for the detection of cancer with strong contrast against surrounding tissues. DWIBS/T2 signals were analyzed in patients with IPMN to investigate positive or negative results.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Patient records were analyzed retrospectively regarding IPMN. None showed high-risk stigmata or worrisome features. To rule out T2 shine-through or differentiate malignant lesions from non-malignant causes of restricted diffusion, positive ADC maps were produced from the recorded ADC values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the patients with IPMN had features of malignant progression. No mural nodules were detected by endoscopic ultrasonography. IPMN was hyperintense with DWIBS/T2 and the ADC map. This finding suggested that the hyperintense values of IPMN were T2 shine-through. These results showed that none of the IPMNs were positive with DWIBS/T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DWIBS/T2 was negative for patients with IPMN. DWIBS/T2 might be useful for the evaluation of malignant progression, in addition to observation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"463-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33254687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: The objective of this retrospective study was to clarify prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1.
Methodology: Both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were examined in 122 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent curative surgery and received adjuvant gemcitabine or S-1 after surgery between 2005 and 2014.
Results: When the length of OS was evaluated according to the log-rank test, significant differences were observed in lymphatic invasion and the T status. Univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazard analyses demonstrated that lymphatic invasion was the only significant independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. The 5-year OS was 30.1% in the lymphatic invasion-negative group and 12.1% in the lymphatic invasion-positive group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the 5-year RFS was 20.5% in the lymphatic invasion-negative group and 10.4% in the lymphatic invasion- positive group (p = 0.006).
Conclusions: Lymphatic invasion is the most important prognostic factor for OS and RFS in patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The present results suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy is not sufficient, especially in patients with risk factors. Such patients should be evaluated as a target group for clinical trials of novel treatments.
{"title":"Lymphatic invasion is an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1.","authors":"Toru Aoyama, Masaaki Murakawa, Yusuke Katayama, Manabu Shiozawa, Makoto Ueno, Manabu Morimoto, Takaki Yoshikawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda, Soichiro Morinaga","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The objective of this retrospective study was to clarify prognostic factors in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were examined in 122 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent curative surgery and received adjuvant gemcitabine or S-1 after surgery between 2005 and 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the length of OS was evaluated according to the log-rank test, significant differences were observed in lymphatic invasion and the T status. Univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazard analyses demonstrated that lymphatic invasion was the only significant independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. The 5-year OS was 30.1% in the lymphatic invasion-negative group and 12.1% in the lymphatic invasion-positive group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the 5-year RFS was 20.5% in the lymphatic invasion-negative group and 10.4% in the lymphatic invasion- positive group (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lymphatic invasion is the most important prognostic factor for OS and RFS in patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The present results suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy is not sufficient, especially in patients with risk factors. Such patients should be evaluated as a target group for clinical trials of novel treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"472-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33254689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: Appropriate drainage management after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is important to prevent and manage serious complications. This prospective study evaluated postoperative complications with either closed or open drainage placement after PD.
Methodology: The incidence of postoperative complications in patients of PD, assigned to 2 groups of closed- and open-drain systems based on assessment periods, were investigated using propensity scores matching (PSM) after accounting for potential covariates.
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups of patients [n = 100; open, 36; closed, 64). Pancreatic fistulae requiring clinical treatment, and wound infection, were found in 33.3% and 15.6%, and 22.2% and 0%, of patients in open- and closed-drainage groups, respectively. Drainage fluid culture showed exogenous infection (63.6% of bacteria) in the open-drain group which was absent in the closed-drainage group. PSM cohorts had 26 patients in either group. Following PSM, pancreatic fistulae requiring treatment were found in 12/26 (46.2%) and 3/26 (11.5%) of patients in the open- and closed-drain groups (RR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.08-0.81), respectively. Intra-abdominal abscess (5/26 [19.2%]) and wound infection (7/26 [26.9%]) were found in the open-drain group only.
Conclusion: These results indicate postoperative retrograde infections may be prevented, and the incidence of pancreatic fistula reduced, with a closed drainage system.
{"title":"Drain selection reduces pancreatic fistulae risk: a propensity-score matched study.","authors":"Daisuke Kato, Takamitsu Sasaki, Kanefumi Yamashita, Satoshi Shinya, Ryo Nakashima, Yuichi Yamashita","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Appropriate drainage management after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is important to prevent and manage serious complications. This prospective study evaluated postoperative complications with either closed or open drainage placement after PD.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The incidence of postoperative complications in patients of PD, assigned to 2 groups of closed- and open-drain systems based on assessment periods, were investigated using propensity scores matching (PSM) after accounting for potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups of patients [n = 100; open, 36; closed, 64). Pancreatic fistulae requiring clinical treatment, and wound infection, were found in 33.3% and 15.6%, and 22.2% and 0%, of patients in open- and closed-drainage groups, respectively. Drainage fluid culture showed exogenous infection (63.6% of bacteria) in the open-drain group which was absent in the closed-drainage group. PSM cohorts had 26 patients in either group. Following PSM, pancreatic fistulae requiring treatment were found in 12/26 (46.2%) and 3/26 (11.5%) of patients in the open- and closed-drain groups (RR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.08-0.81), respectively. Intra-abdominal abscess (5/26 [19.2%]) and wound infection (7/26 [26.9%]) were found in the open-drain group only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate postoperative retrograde infections may be prevented, and the incidence of pancreatic fistula reduced, with a closed drainage system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"485-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33254691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: This multicenter and single arm phase II clinical trial was performed to examine the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as adjuvant treatment after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Methodology: Patients who had undergone R0-1 resection of liver metastases were assigned to 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).
Results: We enrolled 49 cases and analyzed adverse events in 48 cases, since in one patient cancer recurred before starting treatment. As to the relative dose intensity, 5-FU was 78.8%, and oxaliplatin was 75.9%. Adverse events of Grade 3 and above includ- ed 18 cases of neutropenia (37.5%), 4 cases of sensory neuropathy (8.3%), 4 cases of thrombocytopenia (8.3%) and 4 cases of allergy (8.3%), and there were no cases of fatality caused by adverse events. The most difference of adverse event compared with MOSAIC trial (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) was thrombocytopenia. The 2-year DFS was 59.2% (95% CI: 36.7-78.4) in the 49 enrolled cases.
Conclusion: mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy was tolerable. And mFOLFOX6 also seemed to improve DFS. mFOLFOX is one of the options for such patients and appears promising as an adjuvant treatment.
{"title":"Feasibility Assessment of Modified FOLFOX-6 as adjuvant treatment after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: analyses of a multicenter phase II clinical trial (Miyagi-HBPCOG Trial-001).","authors":"Yu Katayose, Kuniharu Yamamoto, Kei Nakagawal, Shinichi Takemura, Michinaga Takahashi, Ryuji Nakamura, Hiromune Shimamura, Toshiki Rikiyama, Shinichi Egawa, Hiroshi Yoshda, Fuyuhiko Motoi, Takeshi Naitoh, Michiaki Unno","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>This multicenter and single arm phase II clinical trial was performed to examine the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as adjuvant treatment after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Patients who had undergone R0-1 resection of liver metastases were assigned to 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 49 cases and analyzed adverse events in 48 cases, since in one patient cancer recurred before starting treatment. As to the relative dose intensity, 5-FU was 78.8%, and oxaliplatin was 75.9%. Adverse events of Grade 3 and above includ- ed 18 cases of neutropenia (37.5%), 4 cases of sensory neuropathy (8.3%), 4 cases of thrombocytopenia (8.3%) and 4 cases of allergy (8.3%), and there were no cases of fatality caused by adverse events. The most difference of adverse event compared with MOSAIC trial (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) was thrombocytopenia. The 2-year DFS was 59.2% (95% CI: 36.7-78.4) in the 49 enrolled cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>mFOLFOX6 after hepatectomy was tolerable. And mFOLFOX6 also seemed to improve DFS. mFOLFOX is one of the options for such patients and appears promising as an adjuvant treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"303-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33255016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: The aim of this study was to compare hard and soft pancreas for short-term complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube.
Methodology: We investigated 156 patients with pancreaticojejunostomy who were classified into two groups of hard pancreas (group A: 79) and soft pancreas (group B: 77). Outcomes, including complications and operative procedures, are reported.
Results: There were no differences between groups A and B for median age, gender, performance status. Biliary drainage ratio and disease classification of Groups A and B were statistically different. In preoperative status, there were no differences in Body Mass Index, total bilirubin, albumin, hemoglobin, creatinine, and PFD. Group B had lower HbA1C levels than group A. In operative procedures, there were no differences in operative times and blood loss, but group B had longer postoperative hospital days than group A. On operative results, there were no differences in mortality, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, hemorrhage, cholangitis, lymph leakage, and others. There were significant differences between groups A and B in morbidity (12.7% vs. 35.1%), pancreatic fistula (0% vs. 9.1%), intra-abdominal abscess (1.3% vs. 9.1%).
Conclusion: Efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube for hard pancreas was demonstrated.
背景/目的:本研究的目的是比较硬胰腺和软胰腺在胰十二指肠切除术中采用导管-粘膜吻合术或胰空肠吻合术而不使用支架管的短期并发症。方法:将156例胰空肠吻合术患者分为硬胰组(A组79例)和软胰组(B组77例)。报告结果,包括并发症和手术程序。结果:A、B两组患者中位年龄、性别、体能状况无显著差异。A组与B组胆道引流率及疾病分型差异有统计学意义。在术前状态下,体重指数、总胆红素、白蛋白、血红蛋白、肌酐和PFD没有差异。B组的HbA1C水平低于a组。在手术过程中,手术时间和出血量没有差异,但B组术后住院天数比a组长。在手术结果中,死亡率、胃排空延迟、胆道瘘、出血、胆管炎、淋巴漏等方面没有差异。A组与B组在发病率(12.7% vs. 35.1%)、胰瘘(0% vs. 9.1%)、腹内脓肿(1.3% vs. 9.1%)方面差异有统计学意义。结论:无支架管胰空肠吻合术治疗坚硬胰腺的疗效明显。
{"title":"Efficacy of non-stented pancreaticojejunostomy demonstrated in the hard pancreas.","authors":"Shuji Suzuki, Yuhi Ozaki, Shin Saida, Satoshi Kaji, Nobusada Koike, Nobuhiko Harada, Tsuneo Hayashi, Mamoru Suzuki, Takafumi Tabuchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare hard and soft pancreas for short-term complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We investigated 156 patients with pancreaticojejunostomy who were classified into two groups of hard pancreas (group A: 79) and soft pancreas (group B: 77). Outcomes, including complications and operative procedures, are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences between groups A and B for median age, gender, performance status. Biliary drainage ratio and disease classification of Groups A and B were statistically different. In preoperative status, there were no differences in Body Mass Index, total bilirubin, albumin, hemoglobin, creatinine, and PFD. Group B had lower HbA1C levels than group A. In operative procedures, there were no differences in operative times and blood loss, but group B had longer postoperative hospital days than group A. On operative results, there were no differences in mortality, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, hemorrhage, cholangitis, lymph leakage, and others. There were significant differences between groups A and B in morbidity (12.7% vs. 35.1%), pancreatic fistula (0% vs. 9.1%), intra-abdominal abscess (1.3% vs. 9.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube for hard pancreas was demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"279-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33253469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: A soft-coagulation system (SCS) was introduced as an effective device to reduce blood loss in hepatectomy. Here we evaluated the efficacy of a two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) for liver transection.
Methodology: The 163 patients with liver tumors were divided into two groups (conventional group and two-surgeon group). Liver transection was conducted using saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery and CUSA in 102 patients (conventional group). In 61 patients (the two-surgeon group), a two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and CUSA for liver resection was performed.
Results: The median blood loss was significantly less in the two-surgeon group compared to the conventional group (354.8 mL vs. 557.8 mL, respec tively: p = 0.0011). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the two-surgeon group compared to the conventional group (12.7 days vs. 15.5 days, p = 0.0035).
Conclusions: The two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and CUSA was significantly reduced blood loss during liver transection, and associated with low morbidity and mortality. This technique may be useful for many hepatobiliary surgeons.
背景/目的:软凝系统(SCS)是肝切除术中减少失血量的有效装置。在这里,我们评估了使用SCS和空腔超声手术吸引器(CUSA)进行肝横断的两种外科技术的效果。方法:将163例肝脏肿瘤患者分为常规组和双外科组。102例患者(常规组)采用盐偶联双极电切加CUSA进行肝切除。在61例患者(双外科医生组)中,采用双外科医生技术,通过SCS和CUSA进行肝切除术。结果:双外科手术组中位失血量明显低于常规手术组(354.8 mL vs 557.8 mL: p = 0.0011)。两组术后住院时间明显短于常规组(12.7天vs 15.5天,p = 0.0035)。结论:采用SCS和CUSA进行预凝的双外科技术可显著减少肝横断术中的失血量,并具有低发病率和死亡率。这项技术可能对许多肝胆外科医生有用。
{"title":"Two-surgeon technique for liver transection using precoagulation by a soft-coagulation system and ultrasonic dissection.","authors":"Nobuya Yamada, Ryosuke Amano, Kenjiro Kimura, Akihiro Murata, Masakazu Yashiro, Sayaka Tanaka, Kenichi Wakasa, Kosei Hirakawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>A soft-coagulation system (SCS) was introduced as an effective device to reduce blood loss in hepatectomy. Here we evaluated the efficacy of a two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) for liver transection.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The 163 patients with liver tumors were divided into two groups (conventional group and two-surgeon group). Liver transection was conducted using saline-coupled bipolar electrocautery and CUSA in 102 patients (conventional group). In 61 patients (the two-surgeon group), a two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and CUSA for liver resection was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median blood loss was significantly less in the two-surgeon group compared to the conventional group (354.8 mL vs. 557.8 mL, respec tively: p = 0.0011). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the two-surgeon group compared to the conventional group (12.7 days vs. 15.5 days, p = 0.0035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The two-surgeon technique using precoagulation by an SCS and CUSA was significantly reduced blood loss during liver transection, and associated with low morbidity and mortality. This technique may be useful for many hepatobiliary surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"389-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33134078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jong Man Kim, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Jae-Won Joh, Jae Berm Park, Joon Hyeok Lee, Sung Joo Kim, Seung Woon Paik, Cheol Keun Park
Background/aims: The characteristics of multiple nudules in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) after curative liver resection remain obscure. We compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognoses between patients with hepatic lesions with multicentric occurrence (MO) and intrahepatic metastasis (IM) at the time of surgical resection.
Methodology: The histopathologic features of multiple tumors from 198 patients of HCC were analyzed and divided into MO group (n = 51, 25.8%) for multicentric HCCs and an IM group (n = 147, 74.2%) in cases with intrahepatic metastases. Overall survival rate, disease-free survival and clinicopathologic differences were compared between the two groups.
Results: Microvascular invasion and increased tumor size were the most important factors discriminating the IM group from the MO group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively). Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests revealed that disease-free survival and overall survival rates in the MO group were significantly higher than those for the IM group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis of Cox's proportional hazards model showed that increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) levels, portal vein invasion and intrahepatic metastases were the most important prognostic factors.
Conclusions: Among HCCs, the prognosis of patients with MO is significantly better than that of patients with IM.
{"title":"Intrahepatic metastasis is more risky than multiple occurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative liver resection.","authors":"Jong Man Kim, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Jae-Won Joh, Jae Berm Park, Joon Hyeok Lee, Sung Joo Kim, Seung Woon Paik, Cheol Keun Park","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The characteristics of multiple nudules in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) after curative liver resection remain obscure. We compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognoses between patients with hepatic lesions with multicentric occurrence (MO) and intrahepatic metastasis (IM) at the time of surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The histopathologic features of multiple tumors from 198 patients of HCC were analyzed and divided into MO group (n = 51, 25.8%) for multicentric HCCs and an IM group (n = 147, 74.2%) in cases with intrahepatic metastases. Overall survival rate, disease-free survival and clinicopathologic differences were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microvascular invasion and increased tumor size were the most important factors discriminating the IM group from the MO group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively). Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests revealed that disease-free survival and overall survival rates in the MO group were significantly higher than those for the IM group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis of Cox's proportional hazards model showed that increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) levels, portal vein invasion and intrahepatic metastases were the most important prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among HCCs, the prognosis of patients with MO is significantly better than that of patients with IM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"399-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33134080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chen Hongwei, Liang Zhang, Li Maoping, Zhang Yong, Du Chengyou, Li Dewei
Background/aims: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication following splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, which also brings difficulties to future possible liver transplantation. This paper retrospectively analyzes the preventive effect of combined anatomic splenectomy and early anticoagulant therapy on post-splenectomy portal vein thrombosis in patients with portal hypertension.
Methodology: We retrospectively analyzed 136 patients who underwent splenectomy at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2013 due to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Patient conditions, such as coagulation function, splenic and portal vein thrombosis, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, pancreatic leakage and intra-abdominal infections, are observed postoperatively.
Results: Despite the presence of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension in patients, early postoperative anticoagulant therapy has no significant impact on coagulation function and intra-abdominal hemorrhage of these patients (p > 0.05). Anatomic splenectomy can reduce the occurrence of complications such as postoperative bleeding, pancreatic leakage and intra-abdominal infections (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Combined anatomic splenectomy and early postoperative anticoagulant therapy can reduce post-splenectomy portal vein thrombosis in patients with portal hypertension, and is conducive to the future liver transplantation therapy may be needed by the patients.
{"title":"Era of liver transplantation: combined anatomic splenectomy and anticoagulant therapy in prevention of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy.","authors":"Chen Hongwei, Liang Zhang, Li Maoping, Zhang Yong, Du Chengyou, Li Dewei","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication following splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, which also brings difficulties to future possible liver transplantation. This paper retrospectively analyzes the preventive effect of combined anatomic splenectomy and early anticoagulant therapy on post-splenectomy portal vein thrombosis in patients with portal hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 136 patients who underwent splenectomy at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2013 due to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Patient conditions, such as coagulation function, splenic and portal vein thrombosis, intra-abdominal hemorrhage, pancreatic leakage and intra-abdominal infections, are observed postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the presence of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension in patients, early postoperative anticoagulant therapy has no significant impact on coagulation function and intra-abdominal hemorrhage of these patients (p > 0.05). Anatomic splenectomy can reduce the occurrence of complications such as postoperative bleeding, pancreatic leakage and intra-abdominal infections (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined anatomic splenectomy and early postoperative anticoagulant therapy can reduce post-splenectomy portal vein thrombosis in patients with portal hypertension, and is conducive to the future liver transplantation therapy may be needed by the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"405-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33134081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background/aims: This retrospective study evaluated 21 patients with early enteral feeding (EEF group) and 22 patients without early enteral feeding (non-EEF group) who underwent open total gastrectomy followed by Roux en Y reconstruction and were RO resectable cases. METHDOLOGY: Postoperative complications and course, postoperative/preoperative body weight, whole meal intake, and nutritional, inflammatory, and immunological parameters were recorded and evaluated in both groups.
Results: Postoperative meal intake was significantly higher and the first day of defecation was significantly earlier in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the blood laboratory data and the rate of complications. In patients with complications, lymphocyte counts and postoperative body weights were compared as indicators of immunostimulation. The lymphocyte counts 7 days after operation and postoperative/preoperative body weight were significantly higher in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group.
Conclusions: Although immunostimulation-like findings were observed in the patients with complications after surgery in the present study, the significance of EEF was not clarified because of the lack of cases whose conditions were severe. EEF should be used especially for patients in whom severe disease is possible and avoidance of TPN is desirable.
背景/目的:本回顾性研究评估了21例早期肠内喂养(EEF组)和22例未早期肠内喂养(非EEF组)行开放式全胃切除术后Roux en Y重建的RO可切除病例。方法:记录并评估两组患者的术后并发症和病程、术后/术前体重、全餐摄入量、营养、炎症和免疫参数。结果:EEF组术后进食量明显高于非EEF组,排便时间明显早于非EEF组。两组患者血液实验室数据及并发症发生率无显著差异。对于有并发症的患者,比较淋巴细胞计数和术后体重作为免疫刺激的指标。EEF组术后7 d淋巴细胞计数及术后/术前体重均显著高于非EEF组。结论:虽然本研究在术后并发症患者中观察到类似免疫刺激的结果,但由于缺乏病情严重的病例,EEF的意义尚不明确。EEF应特别用于可能出现严重疾病的患者,避免TPN是可取的。
{"title":"Comparison between early enteral feeding with a transnasal tube and parenteral nutrition after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.","authors":"Eiji Nomura, Sang-Woong Lee, Masaru Kawai, Hitoshi Hara, Kazuhito Nabeshima, Kenji Nakamura, Kazuhisa Uchiyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 21 patients with early enteral feeding (EEF group) and 22 patients without early enteral feeding (non-EEF group) who underwent open total gastrectomy followed by Roux en Y reconstruction and were RO resectable cases. METHDOLOGY: Postoperative complications and course, postoperative/preoperative body weight, whole meal intake, and nutritional, inflammatory, and immunological parameters were recorded and evaluated in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative meal intake was significantly higher and the first day of defecation was significantly earlier in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the blood laboratory data and the rate of complications. In patients with complications, lymphocyte counts and postoperative body weights were compared as indicators of immunostimulation. The lymphocyte counts 7 days after operation and postoperative/preoperative body weight were significantly higher in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although immunostimulation-like findings were observed in the patients with complications after surgery in the present study, the significance of EEF was not clarified because of the lack of cases whose conditions were severe. EEF should be used especially for patients in whom severe disease is possible and avoidance of TPN is desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"536-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33253614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}