Pub Date : 2024-02-08DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2024.2312969
Sukru Ilke Sezer, Gokhan Camlıyurt, Muhammet Aydin, Emre Akyuz, Georgios Boustras, Sangwon Park
The ship recycling process is one of the most dangerous works performed in marine environments for not only human health but also marine environment and ecology due to the nature of the work. The p...
{"title":"A holistic risk assessment under the D–S evidential theory and FMECA approach of ship recycling process hazards in the maritime environment","authors":"Sukru Ilke Sezer, Gokhan Camlıyurt, Muhammet Aydin, Emre Akyuz, Georgios Boustras, Sangwon Park","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2024.2312969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2024.2312969","url":null,"abstract":"The ship recycling process is one of the most dangerous works performed in marine environments for not only human health but also marine environment and ecology due to the nature of the work. The p...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139751267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-05DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2024.2310816
Tham C. Hoang
Using plastic products has become a daily habit of humans. Over the past 60 years, plastic production has increased ten-fold. If plastics continue to be produced and used, especially in the massive...
{"title":"Nanoplastics and microplastics can pose long-term risks to the natural ecosystem and human health, as do other synthetic pollutants: a need to increase knowledge and public awareness","authors":"Tham C. Hoang","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2024.2310816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2024.2310816","url":null,"abstract":"Using plastic products has become a daily habit of humans. Over the past 60 years, plastic production has increased ten-fold. If plastics continue to be produced and used, especially in the massive...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139751576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-13DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2289106
Xiamei Yao, Qingyi Zhang, Yuanyuan Chen, Yutian Sheng, Huimin Qi, Tingting Yuan, Chun Ou
Regional landscape ecological risk (LER) assessment is of great significance for coordinating the relationship between land use and ecological environment, and for promoting the rational allocation...
{"title":"Spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risk in Anhui section of the Huaihe River ecological and economic belt in China","authors":"Xiamei Yao, Qingyi Zhang, Yuanyuan Chen, Yutian Sheng, Huimin Qi, Tingting Yuan, Chun Ou","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2289106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2289106","url":null,"abstract":"Regional landscape ecological risk (LER) assessment is of great significance for coordinating the relationship between land use and ecological environment, and for promoting the rational allocation...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139460680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-10DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2301522
Songbao Feng, Hao Yu
It is essential to effectively identify the sources and health risks of heavy metals in groundwater in rural areas. Therefore, the sources and health risks of heavy metals in groundwater in rural a...
{"title":"Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater of rural area: a case study in Huaibei plain, China","authors":"Songbao Feng, Hao Yu","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2301522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2301522","url":null,"abstract":"It is essential to effectively identify the sources and health risks of heavy metals in groundwater in rural areas. Therefore, the sources and health risks of heavy metals in groundwater in rural a...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139422590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-06DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2301073
Diana Kättström, Anna Beronius, Urban Boije af Gennäs, Christina Rudén, Marlene Ågerstrand
The EU Cosmetic Products Regulation requires neither environmental data nor environmental risk assessment for individual ingredients or finished cosmetic products. Instead, it relies on REACH to ad...
{"title":"Out of REACH: environmental hazards of cosmetic preservatives","authors":"Diana Kättström, Anna Beronius, Urban Boije af Gennäs, Christina Rudén, Marlene Ågerstrand","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2301073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2301073","url":null,"abstract":"The EU Cosmetic Products Regulation requires neither environmental data nor environmental risk assessment for individual ingredients or finished cosmetic products. Instead, it relies on REACH to ad...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139375015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-29DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2294737
Guanghui Guo, Shiqi Chen, Mei Lei, Liping He
Quantitative source apportionment of ecological and health risks is essential to identify the priority control factors for risk control of soil heavy metals (HMs). A total of 144 topsoil samples we...
{"title":"Priority control factors screening for soil pollution with heavy metal in southwestern China from the view of source-specific environmental risk","authors":"Guanghui Guo, Shiqi Chen, Mei Lei, Liping He","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2294737","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2294737","url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative source apportionment of ecological and health risks is essential to identify the priority control factors for risk control of soil heavy metals (HMs). A total of 144 topsoil samples we...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139065494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-16DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2260095
Yaocong Liu, Jianhua You, Jiyuan Dong, Jiancheng Wang, Hong Zhang
This study aimed to assess the differential effects of size-specific PM (PM2.5, PM10–2.5, and PM10) on daily outpatients for Lower Respiratory Infection (LRI), Pneumonia, and Bronchitis among child...
{"title":"Differential effects of size-specific particulate matter on lower respiratory infections in children: A time-series analysis in Lanzhou, China","authors":"Yaocong Liu, Jianhua You, Jiyuan Dong, Jiancheng Wang, Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2260095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2260095","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the differential effects of size-specific PM (PM2.5, PM10–2.5, and PM10) on daily outpatients for Lower Respiratory Infection (LRI), Pneumonia, and Bronchitis among child...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138684105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-16DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2256886
Frank Glover, Omar Jean-Baptiste, Francesco Del Giudice, Federico Belladelli, Nicolas Seranio, Wade Muncey, Michael L. Eisenberg
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) poses a significant disease burden globally. Glyphosate is the most commonly used herbicide in the United States, and exposure is believed to adversely affect metabolic or...
{"title":"The association between glyphosate exposure and metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults","authors":"Frank Glover, Omar Jean-Baptiste, Francesco Del Giudice, Federico Belladelli, Nicolas Seranio, Wade Muncey, Michael L. Eisenberg","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2256886","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2256886","url":null,"abstract":"Metabolic syndrome (MetS) poses a significant disease burden globally. Glyphosate is the most commonly used herbicide in the United States, and exposure is believed to adversely affect metabolic or...","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-08DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2251585
Adam M. Finkel, Branden B. Johnson
AbstractScholars, decision-makers, and pundits have long tossed around words and numbers meant to demarcate those health/safety risks that are too small to matter at all (called, variously, “trivial” or “de minimis” or “insignificant”), or risks that are so large as to be abhorrent (“unacceptable,” “intolerable,” and the like). But there has been nothing approaching a consensus about how large or small these important probabilities are, and worse, there have been no serious attempts to explore these concepts via any carefully-elicited preferences from laypeople themselves. Perhaps even more concerning, the dominant paradigm—cost-benefit analysis (CBA)—requires balancing of (monetized) risks against the costs of controlling them, but the parallel concepts of de minimis costs and intolerable costs have never been formally considered. As a result of these lapses, all attempts to consider equity or justice in the distribution of how risks and costs are borne are an absurdity, despite claims to the contrary.This article reports on a pair of elicitations involving 1350 laypeople. In one elicitation, a careful set of background and contextual explanations and a structured series of questions probed where each subject perceived lifetime excess mortality risk (from involuntary exposure) to become “so small you would not spend a moment thinking about it,” and where it becomes so large that “you would strongly object, as an ethical matter, to ever having to face it.” With a separate sample, we asked the parallel questions with regard to regulatory costs imposed by the government in the name of risk reduction.Although there was significant interindividual variation in responses, the central tendency of each of these four science-policy-values “goalposts” was as follows: (1) de minimis risk—a lifetime excess chance of premature death of 1 in 770,000; (2) intolerable risk—1 chance in 570; (3) de minimis cost—$25 per year; and (4) intolerable cost—$775 per year. These results offer, for the first time, a principled and evidence-based starting point for further refinement of which risks or costs to individuals can/should be disregarded in setting policy, and which must dominate policies regardless of how total “monetized lives saved” and total dollar costs compare to each other when viewed simplistically.We offer several prescriptions for how CBA might change, and how environmental/health/safety policy might improve, to take account of these fundamental thresholds in how risks and costs actually impose burdens on citizens. Both those interventions that impose intolerable costs while only reducing diffuse and trivially small risks, and those failures to intervene (sufficiently) that perpetuate intolerable risks for the sake of avoiding trivial and eminently manageable costs, are inefficient, unjust, and are thus unethical.Keywords: Risk assessmentstated preferencecost-benefit analysisde minimis riskenvironmental equity AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge th
长期以来,学者、决策者和专家们一直在用词语和数字来区分那些太小而无关紧要的健康/安全风险(各种各样的说法,“微不足道”、“极小”或“微不足道”),或大到令人厌恶的风险(“不可接受”、“无法忍受”等)。但是,对于这些重要的概率有多大或有多小,还没有达成任何共识,更糟糕的是,没有人认真尝试通过外行人自己精心引出的偏好来探索这些概念。也许更令人担忧的是,占主导地位的范例——成本效益分析(CBA)——要求在(货币化的)风险与控制风险的成本之间取得平衡,但最小成本和不可承受成本的平行概念从未被正式考虑过。由于这些失误,所有考虑在如何承担风险和成本的分配中公平或公正的企图都是荒谬的,尽管声称相反。这篇文章报道了一对涉及1350个外行的启发。在一次启发中,一组仔细的背景和背景解释,以及一系列有条理的问题,探讨了每个受试者在哪些方面认为(来自非自愿接触的)终身超额死亡风险会变得“小到你不会花一点时间去想它”,在哪些方面会变得如此之大,以至于“作为一个道德问题,你会强烈反对不得不面对它”。通过一个单独的样本,我们就政府以降低风险的名义施加的监管成本提出了类似的问题。尽管在回应中存在显著的个体差异,但这四个科学政策价值“门柱”的中心趋势如下:(1)最小风险-一生中过早死亡的额外机会为77万分之一;(2) 570的不可容忍风险- 1机会;(3)最低费用-每年25美元;(4)难以忍受的成本——每年775美元。这些结果首次提供了一个原则性和基于证据的起点,可以进一步细化在制定政策时可以/应该忽略个人的哪些风险或成本,以及哪些必须主导政策,而不管从简单的角度来看,“货币化的生命拯救”和总美元成本如何相互比较。考虑到风险和成本如何给公民带来负担的这些基本门槛,我们为CBA如何改变以及环境/健康/安全政策如何改进提供了一些建议。无论是那些只减少分散的、微不足道的小风险而造成无法忍受的成本的干预,还是那些为了避免微不足道的、明显可管理的成本而使无法忍受的风险持续存在的(充分的)干预,都是低效的、不公正的,因此是不道德的。关键字:风险评估偏好成本效益分析最小风险环境公平感谢美国国家科学基金会(决策、风险和管理科学项目)提供的资金支持,授权号1629287。我们感谢Marcus Mayorga为调查编写的计算机程序,以及密歇根大学公共卫生学院的一小群同事和学生,他们作为焦点小组帮助完善和缩短了风险实验。我们特别感谢两位匿名评论者的有益评论。两项心理测量调查均获得决策科学研究所机构审查委员会(IRB00011706)的豁免批准。成本实验于2019年12月2日获批,概率实验于2020年2月26日获批。IRB的结论是,调查问题对受试者构成的风险最小,并且所有信息都已获得,因此无法轻易确定人类受试者的身份,直接或通过与受试者相关的标识符确定。两位作者共同开发、测试和改进了心理测量工具,并分析了收集到的数据。AMF写了这篇文章的初稿,BBJ对此进行了评论。作者报告无利益竞争需要申报。数据可用性声明我们所有NSF项目研究的数据和仪器,包括这里报告的,都存档在Johnson, Branden和Finkel, Adam。估计环境、公共卫生和安全条例的净效益。密歇根大学校际政治与社会研究联盟[j], 2018-07-30。61年https://doi.org/10.3886/E1756 v1。注1“De minimis”在拉丁语中是“关于琐事”的意思,如著名的格言“法律与琐事无关”(De minimis non curat lex)。 其次,他们说,如果世界人口是1020,10-12的风险可能看起来不是那么微不足道。我们同意,但指出实际世界人口是8 × 109,这对RD.16有明显的影响。声称给定伤害的概率甚至可能有其自己的“负效用函数”是有争议的。一些观察者(Pratt和Zeckhauser Citation1987)声称这是荒谬的——只有结果(在这篇文章中是死亡)会有负效用,但结果的概率不会。根据这个观点,1/X的伤害概率是伤害本身负效用的1/X,对于所有X;不同的人可能对危害有不同的看法(不同的支付意愿),但对可能性却没有不同的看法(见EPA citation ation2011,第6页:“似乎不合理……一个人对第二次风险降低Δp的重视远远低于对第一次风险降低Δp的重视”)。当然,这种观点甚至不允许最小风险的概念(给定伤害的非常小的概率只是坏结果的负效用的非常小的一部分),或者不可容忍的风险(Shrader-Frechette Citation1985)。它还反映了人类感知的预期效用观,这种观点已经衰落了近一个世纪(Allais Citation1953),并继续被更丰富的描述所取代,如后悔理论(Bell Citation1982)和前景理论(Thaler Citation1980;Tversky and Kahneman citation; 1992;[j] and van de Kuilen citation . 2009).17一个类似的公民偏好调用比伯德和莱夫的文章早得多。根据Hey等人(Citation2010)的说法,布冯伯爵在1777年提出,为了尝试使用RD来“解决”“圣彼得堡悖论”,一个理性的人不会提供超过13美元来玩这个无限预期价值的游戏。布冯认为,由于56岁的人“忽略了未来24小时内死亡的可能性”,根据当时的死亡率表,未来24小时死亡的概率为1/10,189,因此,概率小于1/10,000的事件可以被忽略在“苯”案中,最高法院判决的上限是10-3人一生;虽然很少有判例法表明OSHA有绝对责任监管1/1000以上的风险,但通过让OSHA决定1/1000以下“重大”和“微不足道”风险之间的界限必须落在哪里,法院可能暗示其风险的上限基准是初步的“不可容忍的”。“19例如,三氯乙烯(TCE)的OSHA PEL为100 ppm。EPA对TCE的吸入单位风险系数为2.3 × 10-5 /(十亿分之一)自1996年以来,美国联邦监管机构必须分别分析其规定对小企业的经济影响,三个主要机构(EPA、OSHA和消费者金融保护局)必须邀请一个由15名小企业代表组成的小组,共同编写一份报告,建议为这一群体提供特别的便利。这一要求将“不可忍受的成本”给予了一个次级群体,使其在监管发展过程中处于有利的(早期)位置,而对那些承担不可忍受风险的人(可能是由于给予小企业的促进伤害的豁免造成的!)参见Finkel Citation2011,以及Bromberg和Finkel Citation2023,关于这方面的建议一位评论者很有帮助地指出,一些受试者可能认为割草机在他们的生活中根本没有用,而另一些人可能认为电动割草机是必要的,而推式割草机是一种不可接受的替代品,尽管更安全。参见章节4.7(“限制”)我们设计这个场景的方式的另一个重要含义是,这里的所有数据都应该被解释为与一个特定产品、危害或暴露的成本和收益有关。我们不是在寻求“综合考虑所有空气污染物的最小累积风险”的估计,或者“所有epa管制物质的总风险是什么?”或者“一个公民永远不应该为所有公共政策支付多少钱?”未来的研究当然可以以更广泛的方式定义“四个角”我们要求每个受试者为自己提供一个别名姓氏,
{"title":"At last, empirical elicitations of the magnitudes of those risks (and costs!) too small to matter and those too large to abide","authors":"Adam M. Finkel, Branden B. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2251585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2251585","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractScholars, decision-makers, and pundits have long tossed around words and numbers meant to demarcate those health/safety risks that are too small to matter at all (called, variously, “trivial” or “de minimis” or “insignificant”), or risks that are so large as to be abhorrent (“unacceptable,” “intolerable,” and the like). But there has been nothing approaching a consensus about how large or small these important probabilities are, and worse, there have been no serious attempts to explore these concepts via any carefully-elicited preferences from laypeople themselves. Perhaps even more concerning, the dominant paradigm—cost-benefit analysis (CBA)—requires balancing of (monetized) risks against the costs of controlling them, but the parallel concepts of de minimis costs and intolerable costs have never been formally considered. As a result of these lapses, all attempts to consider equity or justice in the distribution of how risks and costs are borne are an absurdity, despite claims to the contrary.This article reports on a pair of elicitations involving 1350 laypeople. In one elicitation, a careful set of background and contextual explanations and a structured series of questions probed where each subject perceived lifetime excess mortality risk (from involuntary exposure) to become “so small you would not spend a moment thinking about it,” and where it becomes so large that “you would strongly object, as an ethical matter, to ever having to face it.” With a separate sample, we asked the parallel questions with regard to regulatory costs imposed by the government in the name of risk reduction.Although there was significant interindividual variation in responses, the central tendency of each of these four science-policy-values “goalposts” was as follows: (1) de minimis risk—a lifetime excess chance of premature death of 1 in 770,000; (2) intolerable risk—1 chance in 570; (3) de minimis cost—$25 per year; and (4) intolerable cost—$775 per year. These results offer, for the first time, a principled and evidence-based starting point for further refinement of which risks or costs to individuals can/should be disregarded in setting policy, and which must dominate policies regardless of how total “monetized lives saved” and total dollar costs compare to each other when viewed simplistically.We offer several prescriptions for how CBA might change, and how environmental/health/safety policy might improve, to take account of these fundamental thresholds in how risks and costs actually impose burdens on citizens. Both those interventions that impose intolerable costs while only reducing diffuse and trivially small risks, and those failures to intervene (sufficiently) that perpetuate intolerable risks for the sake of avoiding trivial and eminently manageable costs, are inefficient, unjust, and are thus unethical.Keywords: Risk assessmentstated preferencecost-benefit analysisde minimis riskenvironmental equity AcknowledgementsWe gratefully acknowledge th","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135341667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-30DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2023.2268208
Son T. Tran, Hoa V. Nguyen, Tham C. Hoang
AbstractThe present study investigates microplastic (MP) accumulation in five small marine fish species living in the nearshore sea of Binh Dinh, Vietnam that are commonly consumed by the local coastal communities. Fish (Oxyurichthys ophthalmonema, Stolephorus commersonnii, Decapterus macrosoma, Upeneus moluccensis, Sardinella gibbosa) were collected from four sites in the nearshore sea of Binh Dinh in rainy and dry seasons. The temporal, spatial, and species variations in MP accumulation were evaluated to understand environmental exposure of MPs to fish and potential human exposure to MPs via fish consumption. Microplastics of different types, sizes, and colors were found in the digestive system of the fish species. Microplastic composition included polyethylene, polyvinyl ether, polymethacrylate, polydichloroethylene, polydivinyl ester, poly ester, polyfluoroethylene, and other additives of plastic materials. Microplastic abundance in the fish was dependent on species, site, and season. Overall, microfiber was the dominant MPs. The average total MP abundance range was 4.70–23.80 particles/fish or 0.29–6.21 particles/g fish. There were statistically significant differences in MP abundances between fish species, sites, and seasons. The presence of MPs in the digestive system of fish suggests that MPs are in the nearshore environment of Binh Dinh. The local communities along the coast of Binh Dinh can ingest MPs from consuming small fish at a weekly rate equivalent to one five-hundredth number of rice grains they consume/week.Keywords: Microplastic contaminationmicroplastic exposuremicroplastic accumulationmicroplastic abundancemicroplastic ingestion by fish and humans AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Giang Hoang and Chi Vo for their assistance with fish sampling and preparation for MP analysis. The authors are grateful to the fishermen and coordinators (Dang Van Khoa, Nguyen Huu Bong, Nguyen Van Dung, Nguyen Van Nhieu) for their help with catching fish for the study. The voluntary participation of the ten residents of Hoai Nhon Town and Tuy Phuoc District in the fish consumption survey is greatly appreciated. The authors also acknowledge the consumable materials provided by Quy Nhon University for the research. The authors would like to thank Dr. Yaniv Olshansky for allowing us to use his FTIR instrument for analysis of the samples.Author contributionsSon Tran: Study conceptualization, experimental design and conducting, data analysis, manuscript preparation. Vu Hoa: Experimental conducting, data analysis, sampling map preparation. Tham Hoang: Study conceptualization, experimental design, data analysis, manuscript preparation, overall research advice.Disclosure statementThe authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
摘要本研究调查了生活在越南平定近岸海域的五种小型海洋鱼类的微塑料(MP)积累情况,这些鱼类是当地沿海社区经常食用的。在平定近岸海域的4个地点,分别于雨季和旱季采集了眼氧鱼(Oxyurichthys ophthalmonema)、长尾鱼(Stolephorus commersonnii)、巨尾鱼(Decapterus macrosoma)、moluccensis和长尾沙丁鱼(Sardinella gibbosa)。评估了多磺酸盐积累的时间、空间和物种变化,以了解多磺酸盐对鱼类的环境暴露以及人类通过食用鱼类可能暴露于多磺酸盐。在鱼类的消化系统中发现了不同类型、大小和颜色的微塑料。微塑料的成分包括聚乙烯、聚乙烯醚、聚甲基丙烯酸酯、聚二氯乙烯、聚二乙烯酯、聚乙烯酯、聚氟乙烯等塑料材料的添加剂。鱼类的微塑料丰度取决于物种、地点和季节。总体而言,微纤维是主要的MPs。平均总MP丰度范围为4.70 ~ 23.80粒/条鱼或0.29 ~ 6.21粒/g鱼。MP丰度在鱼种、地点和季节之间有统计学上的显著差异。鱼类消化系统中MPs的存在表明MPs存在于平定的近岸环境中。平定沿海的当地社区可以通过每周食用小鱼摄入MPs,其摄入量相当于他们每周食用的米粒数量的五分之一。关键词:微塑料污染;微塑料暴露;微塑料积累;微塑料丰度;作者感谢渔民和协调员(Dang Van Khoa, Nguyen Huu Bong, Nguyen Van Dung, Nguyen Van Nhieu)为研究捕获鱼类提供的帮助。我们非常感谢会仁镇和图福区的10位居民自愿参与鱼类消费调查。作者也感谢归仁大学为研究提供的耗材。作者要感谢Yaniv Olshansky博士允许我们使用他的FTIR仪器对样品进行分析。作者贡献:研究构思、实验设计与实施、数据分析、稿件准备。Vu Hoa:实验指导,数据分析,采样图制作。Tham Hoang:研究构思、实验设计、数据分析、稿件准备、整体研究建议。声明作者无利益冲突需要声明。
{"title":"Ingestion and accumulation of microplastics in small marine fish and potential human exposure: case study of Binh Dinh, Vietnam","authors":"Son T. Tran, Hoa V. Nguyen, Tham C. Hoang","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2268208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2268208","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe present study investigates microplastic (MP) accumulation in five small marine fish species living in the nearshore sea of Binh Dinh, Vietnam that are commonly consumed by the local coastal communities. Fish (Oxyurichthys ophthalmonema, Stolephorus commersonnii, Decapterus macrosoma, Upeneus moluccensis, Sardinella gibbosa) were collected from four sites in the nearshore sea of Binh Dinh in rainy and dry seasons. The temporal, spatial, and species variations in MP accumulation were evaluated to understand environmental exposure of MPs to fish and potential human exposure to MPs via fish consumption. Microplastics of different types, sizes, and colors were found in the digestive system of the fish species. Microplastic composition included polyethylene, polyvinyl ether, polymethacrylate, polydichloroethylene, polydivinyl ester, poly ester, polyfluoroethylene, and other additives of plastic materials. Microplastic abundance in the fish was dependent on species, site, and season. Overall, microfiber was the dominant MPs. The average total MP abundance range was 4.70–23.80 particles/fish or 0.29–6.21 particles/g fish. There were statistically significant differences in MP abundances between fish species, sites, and seasons. The presence of MPs in the digestive system of fish suggests that MPs are in the nearshore environment of Binh Dinh. The local communities along the coast of Binh Dinh can ingest MPs from consuming small fish at a weekly rate equivalent to one five-hundredth number of rice grains they consume/week.Keywords: Microplastic contaminationmicroplastic exposuremicroplastic accumulationmicroplastic abundancemicroplastic ingestion by fish and humans AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Giang Hoang and Chi Vo for their assistance with fish sampling and preparation for MP analysis. The authors are grateful to the fishermen and coordinators (Dang Van Khoa, Nguyen Huu Bong, Nguyen Van Dung, Nguyen Van Nhieu) for their help with catching fish for the study. The voluntary participation of the ten residents of Hoai Nhon Town and Tuy Phuoc District in the fish consumption survey is greatly appreciated. The authors also acknowledge the consumable materials provided by Quy Nhon University for the research. The authors would like to thank Dr. Yaniv Olshansky for allowing us to use his FTIR instrument for analysis of the samples.Author contributionsSon Tran: Study conceptualization, experimental design and conducting, data analysis, manuscript preparation. Vu Hoa: Experimental conducting, data analysis, sampling map preparation. Tham Hoang: Study conceptualization, experimental design, data analysis, manuscript preparation, overall research advice.Disclosure statementThe authors have no conflict of interest to declare.","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136067689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}