In cancer patients, physical and psychological issues are very common. There is a need for family support and high utilisation of healthcare resources commonly. Palliative care (PC) has grown in popularity to better fulfil of needs of patients and their families and potentially lowering hospital costs. Given that the majority of patients still die in hospitals, there is a need for an effective model of PC for advanced gynaecological cancer, as well as the wise allocation of scarce resources. The main aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of PC to conventional treatment for adults with cancer, including gynaecological cancers, and their caregivers. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching PubMed, PubMed Central, Clinical Key, Embase and other grey literature from a duration of 2011-2021. Cochrane criteria were used to calculate the risk of bias, and the Grade Profiler Guideline Development Tool was used to check the quality of the included studies. Standardised mean differences (SMDs), I2 value and forest plot were prepared by using Review Manager 4.0. A total of four RCTs were extracted by following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and found to have a high risk for bias and low to poor quality of evidence. Included study sample sizes ranged from 22 to 104 participants, including 670 people in total, including 289 patients with advanced cancer patients, including gynaecological cancer and 381 unpaid caregivers. Results also showed that PC enhances patients' quality of life (SMD = 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.29-0.80; I2 = 76%), lowered symptom burden amongst patients (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI = -1.75-0.25; I2 = 89%), reduces patient depression (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.19-0.34; I2 = 0%) and decreases depression in unpaid caregivers (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.56-0.24; I2 = 59%). PC treatment increases patients' quality of life and lowers their symptom burden. In comparison to conventional care, it also reduces depression among patients and caregivers. We believe that the findings should be viewed with care until more recent exclusive RCTs are available.
{"title":"Meta-analysis on Effectiveness of Palliative Care versus Conventional Care amongst Advanced Gynaecological Patients with Cancer and Caregivers.","authors":"Kusum Kumari, C Vasantha Kalyani, Sweety Gupta, Pratima Gupta, Latha Venkatesan, Rakhi Gaur, Vijay Lakshmi","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_145_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_145_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In cancer patients, physical and psychological issues are very common. There is a need for family support and high utilisation of healthcare resources commonly. Palliative care (PC) has grown in popularity to better fulfil of needs of patients and their families and potentially lowering hospital costs. Given that the majority of patients still die in hospitals, there is a need for an effective model of PC for advanced gynaecological cancer, as well as the wise allocation of scarce resources. The main aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of PC to conventional treatment for adults with cancer, including gynaecological cancers, and their caregivers. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching PubMed, PubMed Central, Clinical Key, Embase and other grey literature from a duration of 2011-2021. Cochrane criteria were used to calculate the risk of bias, and the Grade Profiler Guideline Development Tool was used to check the quality of the included studies. Standardised mean differences (SMDs), I<sup>2</sup> value and forest plot were prepared by using Review Manager 4.0. A total of four RCTs were extracted by following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and found to have a high risk for bias and low to poor quality of evidence. Included study sample sizes ranged from 22 to 104 participants, including 670 people in total, including 289 patients with advanced cancer patients, including gynaecological cancer and 381 unpaid caregivers. Results also showed that PC enhances patients' quality of life (SMD = 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.29-0.80; I<sup>2</sup> = 76%), lowered symptom burden amongst patients (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI = -1.75-0.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 89%), reduces patient depression (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.19-0.34; I2 = 0%) and decreases depression in unpaid caregivers (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.56-0.24; I<sup>2</sup> = 59%). PC treatment increases patients' quality of life and lowers their symptom burden. In comparison to conventional care, it also reduces depression among patients and caregivers. We believe that the findings should be viewed with care until more recent exclusive RCTs are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"289-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-11-15DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_155_2024
Jos K Stiliya, Janis Maria Antony, Jasmine Joseph
Spiritual intelligence (SI) has recently gained traction in various fields, including nursing. Given the increasing emphasis on patient-centred care and the holistic well-being of patients and nurses, SI is particularly relevant in nursing practice. A bibliometric analysis of recent publications (2014-2024) in the field helps synthesise and evaluate the existing research on SI in the general field of nursing, identify literature gaps, suggest future research directions and raise awareness of the importance of SI in nursing practice. The present study reports bibliometric data (n = 461) from the Scopus database on SI, spiritual quotient and spiritual care in nursing and health care. The data are analysed using MS Excel and VOSviewer software. The publications' trend analysis revealed a significant increase in SI-related publications since 2015. The study presents top-cited articles. Journal of Religion and Health was found to be a prominent journal with the maximum number of publications, and Sage was found to be the top publisher of journals with articles on SI. Network visualisation reveals central figures such as Wilfred McSherry, Trove Giske, Elizabeth Johnston Taylor, Fiona Timmins, Silvia Caldeira and Linda Ross as key researchers in the field. The United States and Iran have the most substantial connections of authors publishing on SI. This study reveals an increasing interest in SI and care within nursing research, confirming its growing significance in the field. By reporting areas where research on SI in nursing remains underdeveloped, the study paves the way for the development of new or updated curricula in nursing programs. The study can guide faculty development initiatives by highlighting the importance of SI and providing resources for educators to incorporate these concepts into their teaching. This study presents specific research questions to address these knowledge gaps. Future studies which can address these questions will enrich nursing education and practice, leading to improved patient outcomes and enhanced nurse well-being using the full potential of SI in nursing practice.
最近,精神智能(SI)在包括护理在内的各个领域获得了关注。鉴于越来越强调以病人为中心的护理和病人和护士的整体福祉,SI在护理实践中特别相关。对该领域最近发表的文献计量学分析(2014-2024)有助于综合和评估护理一般领域中科学探究的现有研究,识别文献空白,建议未来的研究方向,并提高对科学探究在护理实践中的重要性的认识。本研究报告的文献计量数据(n = 461)来自Scopus数据库的SI,精神商和护理和卫生保健的精神关怀。使用MS Excel和VOSviewer软件对数据进行分析。出版物的趋势分析显示,自2015年以来,与si相关的出版物显著增加。该研究展示了被引用最多的文章。《Journal of Religion and Health》是出版数量最多的著名期刊,《Sage》是科学科学论文最多的期刊出版商。网络可视化揭示了Wilfred McSherry, Trove Giske, Elizabeth Johnston Taylor, Fiona Timmins, Silvia Caldeira和Linda Ross等核心人物作为该领域的关键研究人员。美国和伊朗的作者在SI上发表文章的联系最为密切。这项研究揭示了在护理研究中对SI和护理的兴趣日益增加,证实了其在该领域日益增长的意义。通过报告在护理中的SI研究仍然不发达的领域,该研究为开发新的或更新的护理课程铺平了道路。这项研究可以通过强调科学探究的重要性来指导教师的发展,并为教育工作者提供将这些概念纳入教学的资源。本研究提出了具体的研究问题,以解决这些知识差距。未来的研究可以解决这些问题,将丰富护理教育和实践,导致改善患者的结果和提高护士福祉,充分利用SI在护理实践中的潜力。
{"title":"Spiritual Intelligence and Spiritual Care in Nursing Practice: A Bibliometric Review.","authors":"Jos K Stiliya, Janis Maria Antony, Jasmine Joseph","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_155_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_155_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spiritual intelligence (SI) has recently gained traction in various fields, including nursing. Given the increasing emphasis on patient-centred care and the holistic well-being of patients and nurses, SI is particularly relevant in nursing practice. A bibliometric analysis of recent publications (2014-2024) in the field helps synthesise and evaluate the existing research on SI in the general field of nursing, identify literature gaps, suggest future research directions and raise awareness of the importance of SI in nursing practice. The present study reports bibliometric data (n = 461) from the Scopus database on SI, spiritual quotient and spiritual care in nursing and health care. The data are analysed using MS Excel and VOSviewer software. The publications' trend analysis revealed a significant increase in SI-related publications since 2015. The study presents top-cited articles. Journal of Religion and Health was found to be a prominent journal with the maximum number of publications, and Sage was found to be the top publisher of journals with articles on SI. Network visualisation reveals central figures such as Wilfred McSherry, Trove Giske, Elizabeth Johnston Taylor, Fiona Timmins, Silvia Caldeira and Linda Ross as key researchers in the field. The United States and Iran have the most substantial connections of authors publishing on SI. This study reveals an increasing interest in SI and care within nursing research, confirming its growing significance in the field. By reporting areas where research on SI in nursing remains underdeveloped, the study paves the way for the development of new or updated curricula in nursing programs. The study can guide faculty development initiatives by highlighting the importance of SI and providing resources for educators to incorporate these concepts into their teaching. This study presents specific research questions to address these knowledge gaps. Future studies which can address these questions will enrich nursing education and practice, leading to improved patient outcomes and enhanced nurse well-being using the full potential of SI in nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"304-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618709/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-11-15DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_37_2024
Edgar Fabian Manrique-Hernandez, Esther Ballesteros Goes, Kendrys Hoyos Madera, Anderson Bermon, Alexandra Hurtado-Ortiz, Maricel Licht-Ardila, Giselly Mayerly Nieves-Cuervo
Objectives: The objectives of the study are to assess changes in the quality of life amongst breast cancer patients undergoing treatment at a cancer institute in Colombia.
Materials and methods: Analytical observational prospective cohort study in patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analysed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale measured at diagnosis and after a 6-month follow-up. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were analysed using a logistic regression model, with STATA 16 software.
Results: A total of 103 patients met the included criteria and were included in the study, with a median age of 56 years. According to the Tumour, Node, Metastasis classification of cancer stage, the majority of participants (35.92%) were in stage 2 of cancer. Multivariate analysis revealed that changes in HRQoL were significantly associated with age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, P = 0.001), radiotherapy (OR = 3.56, P = 0.038) and moderate anxiety and depression (OR = 5.54, P = 0.007).
Conclusion: While the overall quality of life in women with breast cancer showed a slight improvement over the 6 months, older patients and those receiving radiotherapy experienced a greater decline in health perception.
目的:本研究的目的是评估在哥伦比亚一家癌症研究所接受治疗的乳腺癌患者生活质量的变化。材料与方法:对18岁以上乳腺癌患者进行分析性观察性前瞻性队列研究。使用EQ-5D-3L问卷和视觉模拟量表在诊断时和随访6个月后测量健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。使用STATA 16软件对社会人口学和临床因素进行logistic回归分析。结果:103例患者符合纳入标准,纳入研究,中位年龄56岁。根据肿瘤、淋巴结、转移的分期,大多数参与者(35.92%)处于癌症的第2期。多因素分析显示,HRQoL的变化与年龄(比值比[OR] = 1.06, P = 0.001)、放疗(OR = 3.56, P = 0.038)、中度焦虑和抑郁(OR = 5.54, P = 0.007)显著相关。结论:虽然乳腺癌妇女的总体生活质量在6个月内略有改善,但老年患者和接受放疗的患者的健康感知下降幅度更大。
{"title":"Perspectives on Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer.","authors":"Edgar Fabian Manrique-Hernandez, Esther Ballesteros Goes, Kendrys Hoyos Madera, Anderson Bermon, Alexandra Hurtado-Ortiz, Maricel Licht-Ardila, Giselly Mayerly Nieves-Cuervo","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_37_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_37_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study are to assess changes in the quality of life amongst breast cancer patients undergoing treatment at a cancer institute in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Analytical observational prospective cohort study in patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was analysed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale measured at diagnosis and after a 6-month follow-up. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were analysed using a logistic regression model, with STATA 16 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients met the included criteria and were included in the study, with a median age of 56 years. According to the Tumour, Node, Metastasis classification of cancer stage, the majority of participants (35.92%) were in stage 2 of cancer. Multivariate analysis revealed that changes in HRQoL were significantly associated with age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, <i>P</i> = 0.001), radiotherapy (OR = 3.56, <i>P</i> = 0.038) and moderate anxiety and depression (OR = 5.54, <i>P</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the overall quality of life in women with breast cancer showed a slight improvement over the 6 months, older patients and those receiving radiotherapy experienced a greater decline in health perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"347-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618642/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: This study was conducted to determine and correlate the perception of social support and the prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms among patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 100 patients with HNSCC receiving treatment at a tertiary cancer centre in north India. They were enrolled by a convenient sampling technique. Subsequently, data regarding sociodemographic profile, clinical profile, perception of social support and prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms were collected through face-to-face interviews using a subject datasheet, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Results: Most of the HNSCC patients, 37%, were in the 42-54 years age category. A male gender predilection (85%) was noted. The two most common subsites involved were the oral cavity (61%) followed by the oropharynx (26%). A majority, 60% of the patients had high social support. Among the subscales of the MSPSS, high social support was obtained majorly from the family (98%), followed by significant others (66%) and friends (52%). The prevalence of self-reported moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms was noted in 36% of patients. The perception of social support and the prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms showed a weak negative correlation (r = -0.262, P = 0.008).
Conclusion: Despite receiving high social support, there was a high prevalence of self-reported moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms in patients with HNSCC. Therefore, it is pertinent to monitor the mental health of patients afflicted with HNSCC and provide mental health rehabilitation as per their needs.
目的:本研究旨在确定头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的社会支持感知与自我报告抑郁症状的患病率之间的关系。材料和方法:本横断面研究包括100例在印度北部三级癌症中心接受治疗的HNSCC患者。他们通过一种方便的抽样技术被登记。随后,使用受试者数据表、多维感知社会支持量表(MSPSS)和患者健康问卷-9,通过面对面访谈收集了有关社会人口学概况、临床概况、社会支持感知和自我报告抑郁症状患病率的数据。结果:大多数HNSCC患者(37%)年龄在42-54岁之间。男性性别偏好(85%)被注意到。两个最常见的亚部位是口腔(61%),其次是口咽部(26%)。大多数,60%的患者有较高的社会支持。在MSPSS的子量表中,高社会支持主要来自家庭(98%),其次是重要他人(66%)和朋友(52%)。36%的患者自我报告有中度至重度抑郁症状。社会支持感知与自述抑郁症状患病率呈弱负相关(r = -0.262, P = 0.008)。结论:尽管获得了很高的社会支持,但HNSCC患者自我报告的中度至重度抑郁症状的患病率很高。因此,监测HNSCC患者的心理健康状况,并根据他们的需要提供心理健康康复是有意义的。
{"title":"Perception of Social Support and Prevalence of Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms among Patients with Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated at a Tertiary Cancer Centre in North India.","authors":"Bhavna Rani, Aditi Prashant Sinha, Kamlesh Kumari Sharma, Barre Vijay Prasad, Muthuvenkatachalam Srinivasan, Ahitagni Biswas","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_56_2023","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_56_2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was conducted to determine and correlate the perception of social support and the prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms among patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 100 patients with HNSCC receiving treatment at a tertiary cancer centre in north India. They were enrolled by a convenient sampling technique. Subsequently, data regarding sociodemographic profile, clinical profile, perception of social support and prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms were collected through face-to-face interviews using a subject datasheet, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the HNSCC patients, 37%, were in the 42-54 years age category. A male gender predilection (85%) was noted. The two most common subsites involved were the oral cavity (61%) followed by the oropharynx (26%). A majority, 60% of the patients had high social support. Among the subscales of the MSPSS, high social support was obtained majorly from the family (98%), followed by significant others (66%) and friends (52%). The prevalence of self-reported moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms was noted in 36% of patients. The perception of social support and the prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms showed a weak negative correlation (r = -0.262, <i>P</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite receiving high social support, there was a high prevalence of self-reported moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms in patients with HNSCC. Therefore, it is pertinent to monitor the mental health of patients afflicted with HNSCC and provide mental health rehabilitation as per their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"336-341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618644/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_23_2024
M Sukumar, Suresh Kumar Thanneeru, Roshan Fakirchand Sutar, Anjan Sahu, Amit Agrawal
The older population is susceptible to dementia, Alzheimer's and depression. A growing elderly population poses a burden on caregivers and society. If their cognitive and psychological health is maintained, they may not need to depend on others for their needs, thereby reducing the burden on caregivers. This, in turn, may lead to a decrease in the necessity for consulting healthcare providers for psychological health, subsequently reducing the overall cost of healthcare. There are numerous options for improving cognitive and mental health in the elderly, one of which is music therapy (MT). In this systematic review, we aim to demonstrate the efficacy of MT in enhancing psychological health among the geriatric population afflicted with dementia and depression. A systematic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored the use of MT in elderly patients with or without depression, dementia, or Alzheimer's. Non-RCTs, retrospective and prospective observational studies, case reports, and case series were excluded. Out of 76 records identified, eight articles were selected for qualitative synthesis and three for meta-analysis. These studies, conducted between 2010 and 2020, involved a total of 605 subjects, with 330 receiving MT and the remainder serving as controls. The interventions varied in terms of music type, duration, and setting, with outcome measures including depression scales, quality of life assessments, and cognitive examinations. The meta-analysis of depression scores indicated a positive effect of MT, though a wide confidence interval warrants caution. The quality assessment revealed varying risks of bias, highlighting the need for further research to confirm the positive role of MT. In conclusion, MT emerges as a promising intervention, but it is accompanied by considerable limitations and heterogeneity among studies. This emphasizes the need for further RCTs that specifically address the identified limitations, including issues related to sample size, control group selection, and potential confounding factors. Conducting more robust research in these areas is crucial to establishing a clearer understanding of the therapeutic benefits of music in the elderly population.
{"title":"Effect of Music Therapy on Quality of Life in Geriatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"M Sukumar, Suresh Kumar Thanneeru, Roshan Fakirchand Sutar, Anjan Sahu, Amit Agrawal","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_23_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_23_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The older population is susceptible to dementia, Alzheimer's and depression. A growing elderly population poses a burden on caregivers and society. If their cognitive and psychological health is maintained, they may not need to depend on others for their needs, thereby reducing the burden on caregivers. This, in turn, may lead to a decrease in the necessity for consulting healthcare providers for psychological health, subsequently reducing the overall cost of healthcare. There are numerous options for improving cognitive and mental health in the elderly, one of which is music therapy (MT). In this systematic review, we aim to demonstrate the efficacy of MT in enhancing psychological health among the geriatric population afflicted with dementia and depression. A systematic search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored the use of MT in elderly patients with or without depression, dementia, or Alzheimer's. Non-RCTs, retrospective and prospective observational studies, case reports, and case series were excluded. Out of 76 records identified, eight articles were selected for qualitative synthesis and three for meta-analysis. These studies, conducted between 2010 and 2020, involved a total of 605 subjects, with 330 receiving MT and the remainder serving as controls. The interventions varied in terms of music type, duration, and setting, with outcome measures including depression scales, quality of life assessments, and cognitive examinations. The meta-analysis of depression scores indicated a positive effect of MT, though a wide confidence interval warrants caution. The quality assessment revealed varying risks of bias, highlighting the need for further research to confirm the positive role of MT. In conclusion, MT emerges as a promising intervention, but it is accompanied by considerable limitations and heterogeneity among studies. This emphasizes the need for further RCTs that specifically address the identified limitations, including issues related to sample size, control group selection, and potential confounding factors. Conducting more robust research in these areas is crucial to establishing a clearer understanding of the therapeutic benefits of music in the elderly population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"296-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618675/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-09-25DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_166_2024
M V Ashwini, Archith Boloor, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Gauri Thukral
Objectives: The objective of this study was to achieve integration of goals of care discussion (GOCD) as a routine part of assessment among seriously ill patients admitted to medical wards and assess its impact on patient satisfaction, caregiver satisfaction and quality of life (QOL).
Materials and methods: This was non-randomised before and after study - A quality improvement project involving three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles each of 6 weeks duration. The study included a total of 60 patients and their caregivers admitted to the Internal Medicine Unit in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Junior residents from Internal Medicine were trained in conducting a GOCD through a face to face training session and through an online training program using capc.org modules. Through a process of three PDSA cycles, we introduced the documentation of GOCD as a routine part of the assessment of seriously ill patients and assessed its impact on QOL and patient satisfaction.
Results: Following the introduction of GOCD, patient and caregiver satisfaction had a statistically significant improvement across the majority of the assessed domains, and there was an overall improvement in the mean World Health Organization QOL Brief Version QOL scores by 4.8.
Conclusion: Among patients with serious illness, GOCD improved patient and caregiver satisfaction and QOL. Such conversations are essential to align the care delivery with patient preferences and help in providing patient-centred care.
{"title":"Impact of an Early Goals of Care Discussion on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life among Seriously Ill Patients Admitted to the Medical Wards - A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"M V Ashwini, Archith Boloor, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Gauri Thukral","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_166_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_166_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to achieve integration of goals of care discussion (GOCD) as a routine part of assessment among seriously ill patients admitted to medical wards and assess its impact on patient satisfaction, caregiver satisfaction and quality of life (QOL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was non-randomised before and after study - A quality improvement project involving three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles each of 6 weeks duration. The study included a total of 60 patients and their caregivers admitted to the Internal Medicine Unit in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Junior residents from Internal Medicine were trained in conducting a GOCD through a face to face training session and through an online training program using capc.org modules. Through a process of three PDSA cycles, we introduced the documentation of GOCD as a routine part of the assessment of seriously ill patients and assessed its impact on QOL and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the introduction of GOCD, patient and caregiver satisfaction had a statistically significant improvement across the majority of the assessed domains, and there was an overall improvement in the mean World Health Organization QOL Brief Version QOL scores by 4.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with serious illness, GOCD improved patient and caregiver satisfaction and QOL. Such conversations are essential to align the care delivery with patient preferences and help in providing patient-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"330-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-11-15DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_48_2024
Sonali Vadi, Shreya Gudka, Priyadarshini Deo
Objectives: Mortality is a common gauged endpoint in critically ill patients. Reduced quality of life is an aligned repercussion of protracted critical illness. Baseline status, severity of illness and its trajectory influence the outcomes. Patient-oriented outcomes are those that matter the most to a patient. However, quite often, family approves of trade-offs with survivorship in the Indian context. We looked at non-mortality outcomes in patients on high-intensity life-sustaining interventions admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) despite poor prognosis and died on full support or survived to be completely dependent.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective chart review study, we studied patients (1) who spent more than 1 month in the hospital enduring a myriad of distressing physical and psychological vicissitudes, (2) whose primary illness was fairly advanced (3) and either succumbed or survived to be impeded in their response to cognitive assessment and with severe functional impairment. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-morbid functional status, burden of critical illness, use of life-sustaining therapies, functional dependence in the last week of ICU stay, best neurological status in the last week pre-death or discharge, dying trajectories and economic analysis were noted.
Results: Trends of clinical progress of 23 patients were deliberated. The mean age of males was 65 years and 61 years for females. Five patients had a Barthel index score of 10-20, indicating total dependency and two patients had a score of 21-60, indicating severe dependency. Two patients were cognitively impaired at baseline. The worst neurological status in the week before death or discharge was eye1, motor1, and verbaltracheostomised. Thirteen patients succumbed during ongoing treatment.
Conclusion: Daily discussions on the dynamics of illness progression need to take place with family on a regular basis for patients managed in ICU. Realistic perceptions and grounded expectations from the families and caregivers are necessary for patient-centred outcomes.
{"title":"Quality of Life as a Non-mortality Patient-centred Outcome in the Critically Ill: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Sonali Vadi, Shreya Gudka, Priyadarshini Deo","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_48_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_48_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mortality is a common gauged endpoint in critically ill patients. Reduced quality of life is an aligned repercussion of protracted critical illness. Baseline status, severity of illness and its trajectory influence the outcomes. Patient-oriented outcomes are those that matter the most to a patient. However, quite often, family approves of trade-offs with survivorship in the Indian context. We looked at non-mortality outcomes in patients on high-intensity life-sustaining interventions admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) despite poor prognosis and died on full support or survived to be completely dependent.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective chart review study, we studied patients (1) who spent more than 1 month in the hospital enduring a myriad of distressing physical and psychological vicissitudes, (2) whose primary illness was fairly advanced (3) and either succumbed or survived to be impeded in their response to cognitive assessment and with severe functional impairment. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-morbid functional status, burden of critical illness, use of life-sustaining therapies, functional dependence in the last week of ICU stay, best neurological status in the last week pre-death or discharge, dying trajectories and economic analysis were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trends of clinical progress of 23 patients were deliberated. The mean age of males was 65 years and 61 years for females. Five patients had a Barthel index score of 10-20, indicating total dependency and two patients had a score of 21-60, indicating severe dependency. Two patients were cognitively impaired at baseline. The worst neurological status in the week before death or discharge was eye1, motor1, and verbaltracheostomised. Thirteen patients succumbed during ongoing treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daily discussions on the dynamics of illness progression need to take place with family on a regular basis for patients managed in ICU. Realistic perceptions and grounded expectations from the families and caregivers are necessary for patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"366-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-11-15DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_104_2024
Avinash Tiwari, Arun Ghoshal, Jayita K Deodhar, Mary Ann Muckaden
Objectives: In this study, our primary objectives were to validate the palliative prognostic index (PPI) tool in the context of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Specifically, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the PPI in predicting actual survival in these patients through prospective validation.
Materials and methods: To achieve our objectives, we enrolled a cohort of 227 advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. The study population comprised 132 (58.1%) men and 95 (41.9%) women, with a median age of 52 years (Range: 20-81). Among them, 56 (24.7%) underwent chemotherapy, and 26 (11.5%) underwent palliative radiotherapy. We utilised the PPI score to categorise patients into three prognostic groups: (a) PPI score <4 indicating likely survival of more than 6 weeks; (b) PPI score 4-6 indicating likely survival shorter than 6 weeks; and (c) PPI score >6 indicating likely survival <3 weeks.
Results: Through our analysis, we found that the PPI demonstrated limited predictive capabilities, particularly for short-term survival (<3 weeks). The PPI's performance metrics included a positive predictive value of 45.24%, a negative predictive value of 100%, a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 88.94%.
Conclusion: In conclusion, our study establishes the limited reliability of the PPI in predicting short-term survival (<3 weeks) among patients in palliative care with advanced cancer. These findings underscore the PPI's potential as a valuable tool for healthcare professionals, aiding in the development of treatment plans and facilitating discussions on end-of-life care options with patients and their families. In addition, the PPI may assist healthcare professionals in identifying individuals who could benefit from more aggressive interventions or those approaching the end of life, thereby guiding the provision of additional support and care.
{"title":"A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Demonstrate the Utility of the Palliative Prognostic Index in Forecasting the Short-term Survival of Patients with Advanced Cancer in India.","authors":"Avinash Tiwari, Arun Ghoshal, Jayita K Deodhar, Mary Ann Muckaden","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_104_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_104_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, our primary objectives were to validate the palliative prognostic index (PPI) tool in the context of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Specifically, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the PPI in predicting actual survival in these patients through prospective validation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To achieve our objectives, we enrolled a cohort of 227 advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. The study population comprised 132 (58.1%) men and 95 (41.9%) women, with a median age of 52 years (Range: 20-81). Among them, 56 (24.7%) underwent chemotherapy, and 26 (11.5%) underwent palliative radiotherapy. We utilised the PPI score to categorise patients into three prognostic groups: (a) PPI score <4 indicating likely survival of more than 6 weeks; (b) PPI score 4-6 indicating likely survival shorter than 6 weeks; and (c) PPI score >6 indicating likely survival <3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through our analysis, we found that the PPI demonstrated limited predictive capabilities, particularly for short-term survival (<3 weeks). The PPI's performance metrics included a positive predictive value of 45.24%, a negative predictive value of 100%, a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 88.94%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our study establishes the limited reliability of the PPI in predicting short-term survival (<3 weeks) among patients in palliative care with advanced cancer. These findings underscore the PPI's potential as a valuable tool for healthcare professionals, aiding in the development of treatment plans and facilitating discussions on end-of-life care options with patients and their families. In addition, the PPI may assist healthcare professionals in identifying individuals who could benefit from more aggressive interventions or those approaching the end of life, thereby guiding the provision of additional support and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"353-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2017 Lancet Commission reports 'Serious Health-related Suffering' (SHS) as an abyss in healthcare services. It lists 20 common health conditions and 15 symptoms as commonly associated with SHS. In 2015, 80% of SHS prevalence, an estimated 61 million, was noted as from low-middle-income countries. Acknowledging the high prevalence of SHS in cancer patients and aligning with global efforts to address and alleviate the suffering, the National Cancer Grid of India developed and evaluated the SHS screening tool (SHS-tool). The SHS tool was developed during phase 1 of the study through a systematic consensus-building methodology. During phase 2, the validity and feasibility study of the SHS tool was completed through a multicentric field test, which is described here.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The SHS tool developed during phase 1 was field-tested across nine tertiary cancer care centres (TCC sites) selected from different healthcare sectors and regions of India. The study utilised a purposive sample of 254 cancer patients to evaluate the validity of the SHS screening tool at selected sites and additionally recorded the feasibility, relevance, acceptability and feedback comments from patients (<i>n</i> = 121), research associates (<i>n</i> = 11) and principal investigators (PIs) (<i>n</i> = 9). A documented interview of the patient within the same timeframe by experienced personnel selected by the PI served as the standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The field-test TCC-sites represented government academic institutions, non-government and private sectors. The sites used patient waiting areas and inpatient/daycare wards for conducting field tests. The Cronbach's alpha of the SHS-tool questionnaire showed an internal consistency of 0.728. The tool detected SHS in 137/254 patients, compared to 116/254 through the interview method. The outcomes concurred with that of the interview in 64.17% of instances. The tool exhibited a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 59%. 66.67% of patients might not have reached the interviewers if not for the field test processes. The feasibility questionnaire responses from patients (<i>n</i> = 121) indicated ease of understanding (91.74%), ease of use (92.56%) and relevance (89.26%). The selected settings were found suitable by 96.69%. Feedback responses from research associates indicated ease of administration (10/11) and relevance (8/11) and found no reasons preventing its use (8/11). The feedback comments from the stakeholders were thematically grouped for insights.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SHS tool is validated for screening SHS where none exists. It has been found to be a feasible, relevant and acceptable tool for use in adult cancer patients attending TCCs across India. Insights from analysing the feedback comments from the stakeholders have been integrated as 'instruction for use' for refined implementation of the SHS tool. The SHS tool may be
{"title":"A Multicentric Field Test to Study the Validity and Feasibility of the SHS-tool to Screen for Serious Health-related Suffering in Adult Patients with Cancer.","authors":"Nandini Vallath, Aneka Paul, Arunangshu Ghoshal, Jenifer Jeba Sundararaj, Kalpana Balakrishnan","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_13_2024","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_13_2024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2017 Lancet Commission reports 'Serious Health-related Suffering' (SHS) as an abyss in healthcare services. It lists 20 common health conditions and 15 symptoms as commonly associated with SHS. In 2015, 80% of SHS prevalence, an estimated 61 million, was noted as from low-middle-income countries. Acknowledging the high prevalence of SHS in cancer patients and aligning with global efforts to address and alleviate the suffering, the National Cancer Grid of India developed and evaluated the SHS screening tool (SHS-tool). The SHS tool was developed during phase 1 of the study through a systematic consensus-building methodology. During phase 2, the validity and feasibility study of the SHS tool was completed through a multicentric field test, which is described here.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The SHS tool developed during phase 1 was field-tested across nine tertiary cancer care centres (TCC sites) selected from different healthcare sectors and regions of India. The study utilised a purposive sample of 254 cancer patients to evaluate the validity of the SHS screening tool at selected sites and additionally recorded the feasibility, relevance, acceptability and feedback comments from patients (<i>n</i> = 121), research associates (<i>n</i> = 11) and principal investigators (PIs) (<i>n</i> = 9). A documented interview of the patient within the same timeframe by experienced personnel selected by the PI served as the standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The field-test TCC-sites represented government academic institutions, non-government and private sectors. The sites used patient waiting areas and inpatient/daycare wards for conducting field tests. The Cronbach's alpha of the SHS-tool questionnaire showed an internal consistency of 0.728. The tool detected SHS in 137/254 patients, compared to 116/254 through the interview method. The outcomes concurred with that of the interview in 64.17% of instances. The tool exhibited a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 59%. 66.67% of patients might not have reached the interviewers if not for the field test processes. The feasibility questionnaire responses from patients (<i>n</i> = 121) indicated ease of understanding (91.74%), ease of use (92.56%) and relevance (89.26%). The selected settings were found suitable by 96.69%. Feedback responses from research associates indicated ease of administration (10/11) and relevance (8/11) and found no reasons preventing its use (8/11). The feedback comments from the stakeholders were thematically grouped for insights.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SHS tool is validated for screening SHS where none exists. It has been found to be a feasible, relevant and acceptable tool for use in adult cancer patients attending TCCs across India. Insights from analysing the feedback comments from the stakeholders have been integrated as 'instruction for use' for refined implementation of the SHS tool. The SHS tool may be","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"239-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142380715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_338_2023
Kriti Singh
The paper is based on mixed-methods analysis, including qualitative (thematic analysis) and quantitative (word frequency and trends analysis), to thoroughly investigate the existing body of literature pertaining to the influence of social media (SM) on palliative care (PC). The time frame of the analysis is for a 5-year (2018-2023). The paper attempts to explore dominating themes and explore how SM has impacted the arena of palliative, how these platforms affect patient and community involvement and how successful digital communication tactics are when used to advocate for PC.
{"title":"Communicating Care in Digital Social Spaces: Mixed-method Analysis of Influence of Social Media on Palliative Care.","authors":"Kriti Singh","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_338_2023","DOIUrl":"10.25259/IJPC_338_2023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper is based on mixed-methods analysis, including qualitative (thematic analysis) and quantitative (word frequency and trends analysis), to thoroughly investigate the existing body of literature pertaining to the influence of social media (SM) on palliative care (PC). The time frame of the analysis is for a 5-year (2018-2023). The paper attempts to explore dominating themes and explore how SM has impacted the arena of palliative, how these platforms affect patient and community involvement and how successful digital communication tactics are when used to advocate for PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"189-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450887/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142380719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}