Purpose: This study evaluates the performance and safety of the Optiflex Trio trifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) in Indian cataract patients.
Design: Single-arm prospective clinical study.
Methods: Patients undergoing phacoemulsification for senile cataracts received bilateral Optiflex Trio trifocal IOLs. Visual outcomes, spherical equivalent, reading performance, contrast sensitivity, stereo acuity, and high-order aberrations were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Results: A total of 93 eyes were implanted with IOL and showed significant improvement from pre-op to 12 months in the uncorrected distance (UDVA: 0.74 ± 0.33 to 0.01 ± 0.04 logMAR, P = 0.0001), intermediate (UIVA: 0.62 ± 0.20 to 0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR, P = 0.0001) and near visual acuity (UNVA: 0.57 ± 0.20 to 0.01 ± 0.02 logMAR, P = 0.0001), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA: 0.45 ± 0.29 to 0.00 ± 0.01 logMAR, P = 0.0001), and distance-corrected visual acuities (DCIVA and DCNVA: 0.32 ± 0.23 to 0.00 logMAR, P = 0.0001). The contrast sensitivity increased from 0.52 ± 0.40 to 1.49 ± 0.05 (P = 0.0001), while high-order and total aberrations decreased (0.87 ± 0.71 to 0.16 ± 0.11 mm and 1.55 ± 1.13 to 0.21 ± 0.07 mm, both P = 0.0001). Near/intermediate reading speeds improved by 5.18 ± 8.72 and 5.15 ± 8.72 words/min (P = 0.000). Stereo acuity significantly enhanced, with FD2 from 265.14 ± 124.93 to 83.41 ± 12.56 and Near Radnor from 211.71 ± 114.60 to 74.77 ± 6.98 (P < 0.0001). No adverse events were reported.
目的:评价Optiflex Trio三焦人工晶状体(iol)在印度白内障患者中的应用效果和安全性。设计:单臂前瞻性临床研究。方法:对老年性白内障行超声乳化术的患者行双侧Optiflex Trio三焦人工晶体植入术。在第1周、第1个月、第3个月、第6个月和第12个月时评估视力结果、球面等效度、阅读性能、对比敏感度、立体视敏度和高阶像差。结果:总共有93眼植入人工晶体,显著改善从准备到12个月的距离(UDVA: 0.74±0.33,0.01±0.04 logMAR, P = 0.0001),中间(UIVA: 0.62±0.20,0.01±0.03 logMAR, P = 0.0001)和附近的视力(UNVA: 0.57±0.20,0.01±0.02 logMAR, P = 0.0001),距离最佳矫正视力(BCDVA: 0.45±0.29,0.00±0.01 logMAR, P = 0.0001),和distance-corrected视觉≤(DCIVA DCNVA:0.32±0.23至0.00 logMAR, P = 0.0001)。对比敏感度由0.52±0.40提高到1.49±0.05 (P = 0.0001),高阶像差和总像差分别由0.87±0.71降至0.16±0.11 mm和1.55±1.13降至0.21±0.07 mm, P = 0.0001)。近/中级阅读速度分别提高了5.18±8.72和5.15±8.72 words/min (P = 0.000)。立体视敏度显著提高,FD2从265.14±124.93提高到83.41±12.56,近Radnor从211.71±114.60提高到74.77±6.98 (P < 0.0001)。无不良事件报告。结论:Optiflex Trio三焦人工晶状体可提高视力,减少像差,支持眼镜独立性。
{"title":"Clinical assessment of visual outcomes and safety in Indian cataract patients implanted with the Optiflex Trio trifocal intraocular lens.","authors":"Namrata Sharma, Aafreen Bari, Chetan Shakkarwal, Gagan Sharma, Abhishek Yadav, Prakhyat Roop, Rohit Saxena, Bhavnita Soni, Bhargav Joshi","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1144_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1144_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the performance and safety of the Optiflex Trio trifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) in Indian cataract patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-arm prospective clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing phacoemulsification for senile cataracts received bilateral Optiflex Trio trifocal IOLs. Visual outcomes, spherical equivalent, reading performance, contrast sensitivity, stereo acuity, and high-order aberrations were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 93 eyes were implanted with IOL and showed significant improvement from pre-op to 12 months in the uncorrected distance (UDVA: 0.74 ± 0.33 to 0.01 ± 0.04 logMAR, P = 0.0001), intermediate (UIVA: 0.62 ± 0.20 to 0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR, P = 0.0001) and near visual acuity (UNVA: 0.57 ± 0.20 to 0.01 ± 0.02 logMAR, P = 0.0001), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA: 0.45 ± 0.29 to 0.00 ± 0.01 logMAR, P = 0.0001), and distance-corrected visual acuities (DCIVA and DCNVA: 0.32 ± 0.23 to 0.00 logMAR, P = 0.0001). The contrast sensitivity increased from 0.52 ± 0.40 to 1.49 ± 0.05 (P = 0.0001), while high-order and total aberrations decreased (0.87 ± 0.71 to 0.16 ± 0.11 mm and 1.55 ± 1.13 to 0.21 ± 0.07 mm, both P = 0.0001). Near/intermediate reading speeds improved by 5.18 ± 8.72 and 5.15 ± 8.72 words/min (P = 0.000). Stereo acuity significantly enhanced, with FD2 from 265.14 ± 124.93 to 83.41 ± 12.56 and Near Radnor from 211.71 ± 114.60 to 74.77 ± 6.98 (P < 0.0001). No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optiflex Trio trifocal IOL enhances vision, reduces aberrations, and supports spectacle independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rohan Daniel, Premanand Chandran, Mohammed S Uduman, Abhipsa Sahu, Mrunali Dhavalikar, Ganesh V Raman
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) using the original and revised pars plana probe in patients with glaucoma.
Methods: Retrospective review of records who underwent MP-TSCPC between August 2020 and July 2023. Patients aged >12 years and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 6 and ≤21 mm Hg with the same or fewer antiglaucoma medications and a minimum of 20% IOP reduction.
Results: A total of 21 eyes treated with the original probe and 22 eyes treated with the revised probe were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Mean IOP reduced from 30.3 ± 9.9 mm Hg to 21.8 ± 8.2 and 20.2 ± 7.5 (P < 0.001) mm Hg at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, with the original probe and from 26.1 ± 8.4 mm Hg to 19.1 ± 7.4 and 18.8 ± 5.8 (P = 0.009) mm Hg at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, with the revised probe. The difference between the probes was not statistically significant at all-time points. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications reduced from 3.9 ± 0.7 to 3.3 ± 1 at 1 year (P = 0.006) with the original probe and from 3.9 ± 1.1 to 3.4 ± 1.4 at 1 year (P = 0.045) with the revised probe. The probability of qualified success at 1 year was 33.3% for the original probe and 40.9% for the revised probe (P = 0.755).
Conclusion: MP-TSCPC is a safe and effective treatment for reducing IOP with both the original and revised probes, but the efficacy is not long-lasting.
目的:比较原始和改进的平面部探针微脉冲经巩膜光凝治疗青光眼的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2020年8月至2023年7月期间接受MP-TSCPC手术的记录。患者年龄为bb0 ~ 12岁,随访时间至少为1年。成功的定义是眼内压(IOP)≥6和≤21 mm Hg,使用相同或更少的抗青光眼药物,IOP至少降低20%。结果:共有21只眼采用原探头治疗,22只眼采用改良探头治疗。两组患者的基线特征具有可比性。平均IOP在6个月和1年分别从30.3±9.9 mm Hg降至21.8±8.2和20.2±7.5 (P < 0.001) mm Hg,在6个月和1年分别从26.1±8.4 mm Hg降至19.1±7.4和18.8±5.8 (P = 0.009) mm Hg。在所有时间点上,探测器之间的差异没有统计学意义。使用原始探针时,抗青光眼药物的平均数量从3.9±0.7减少到3.3±1 (P = 0.006),使用改进探针时,平均数量从3.9±1.1减少到3.4±1.4 (P = 0.045)。1年后,原始探针的成功率为33.3%,改良探针的成功率为40.9% (P = 0.755)。结论:MP-TSCPC是一种安全有效的降低IOP的方法,但其疗效不持久。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation using the original and revised pars plana probe.","authors":"Rohan Daniel, Premanand Chandran, Mohammed S Uduman, Abhipsa Sahu, Mrunali Dhavalikar, Ganesh V Raman","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1803_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1803_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of micropulse transcleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) using the original and revised pars plana probe in patients with glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of records who underwent MP-TSCPC between August 2020 and July 2023. Patients aged >12 years and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 6 and ≤21 mm Hg with the same or fewer antiglaucoma medications and a minimum of 20% IOP reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 eyes treated with the original probe and 22 eyes treated with the revised probe were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Mean IOP reduced from 30.3 ± 9.9 mm Hg to 21.8 ± 8.2 and 20.2 ± 7.5 (P < 0.001) mm Hg at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, with the original probe and from 26.1 ± 8.4 mm Hg to 19.1 ± 7.4 and 18.8 ± 5.8 (P = 0.009) mm Hg at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, with the revised probe. The difference between the probes was not statistically significant at all-time points. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications reduced from 3.9 ± 0.7 to 3.3 ± 1 at 1 year (P = 0.006) with the original probe and from 3.9 ± 1.1 to 3.4 ± 1.4 at 1 year (P = 0.045) with the revised probe. The probability of qualified success at 1 year was 33.3% for the original probe and 40.9% for the revised probe (P = 0.755).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MP-TSCPC is a safe and effective treatment for reducing IOP with both the original and revised probes, but the efficacy is not long-lasting.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachna Meel, Manu Saini, Hage Angku, Neelam Pushker, Sahil Agrawal, Seema Kashyap, Seema Sen
Abstract: IgG4-related orbital disease is an emerging systemic fibroinflammatory disease that has gained considerable recognition in the past 2 decades. The varied location and presentation of this indolent disease may often result in a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. Early recognition, comprehensive systemic evaluation, and multidisciplinary approaches are essential for its management. Delayed diagnosis can cause irreversible organ damage, and this disease has shown to be associated with an increased risk of death. This article provides an update on the ophthalmic disease presentation, diagnostic criteria, and management.
{"title":"IgG4-related orbital disease - An update.","authors":"Rachna Meel, Manu Saini, Hage Angku, Neelam Pushker, Sahil Agrawal, Seema Kashyap, Seema Sen","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_603_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_603_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>IgG4-related orbital disease is an emerging systemic fibroinflammatory disease that has gained considerable recognition in the past 2 decades. The varied location and presentation of this indolent disease may often result in a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. Early recognition, comprehensive systemic evaluation, and multidisciplinary approaches are essential for its management. Delayed diagnosis can cause irreversible organ damage, and this disease has shown to be associated with an increased risk of death. This article provides an update on the ophthalmic disease presentation, diagnostic criteria, and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Parikshit Gogate, Sunny Manava, Supriya Phadke, Bageshri Gogate, Taraprasad Das
Purpose: We aim to study the Vision Centre-Based Community Eye Health Programs in an underserved urban slum in Pune city, India, using Budget Impact Analysis from a payer's perspective.
Methods: Input costs, training, human resources, capital equipment cost, recurrent consumable costs, salaries, and rent were calculated from January 2015 to December 2022. The income earned from subsidized outpatient care, optical services, and surgeries was calculated. The monthly reports of the center were used to calculate the number of beneficiaries. Data were stored in Excel and analyzed in R software. Free surgeries, consultations, and spectacles were distributed to needy patients occasionally during these years.
Results: The Vision Centre at Phulenagar, Vishrantwadi, Pune, in partnership with Operation Eyesight Universal, has been operational since January 2015, providing critical eye health services to the community. Over 5 years, the center examined 44,535 individuals, with 98.1% re-examined in 2019, and significantly reduced the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment. Budget impact analysis revealed the center's establishment cost, net budget impact, and the economic impacts of various operational scenarios. Sensitivity analysis showed that income from surgeries had the highest influence on total income, while spectacle costs affected total costs the most. Scenario analysis highlighted that a combined approach of reducing costs and increasing income, particularly in the absence of District Blindness Control Society subsidy, could improve the financial sustainability of the Vision Centre.
Conclusion: Vision center-based prevention of blindness and vision impairment programs, combined with home screening, is effective clinically and economically.
{"title":"Budget impact analysis of a vision center-based community eye health program in an underserved urban slum in India.","authors":"Parikshit Gogate, Sunny Manava, Supriya Phadke, Bageshri Gogate, Taraprasad Das","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_3388_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3388_23","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to study the Vision Centre-Based Community Eye Health Programs in an underserved urban slum in Pune city, India, using Budget Impact Analysis from a payer's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Input costs, training, human resources, capital equipment cost, recurrent consumable costs, salaries, and rent were calculated from January 2015 to December 2022. The income earned from subsidized outpatient care, optical services, and surgeries was calculated. The monthly reports of the center were used to calculate the number of beneficiaries. Data were stored in Excel and analyzed in R software. Free surgeries, consultations, and spectacles were distributed to needy patients occasionally during these years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Vision Centre at Phulenagar, Vishrantwadi, Pune, in partnership with Operation Eyesight Universal, has been operational since January 2015, providing critical eye health services to the community. Over 5 years, the center examined 44,535 individuals, with 98.1% re-examined in 2019, and significantly reduced the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment. Budget impact analysis revealed the center's establishment cost, net budget impact, and the economic impacts of various operational scenarios. Sensitivity analysis showed that income from surgeries had the highest influence on total income, while spectacle costs affected total costs the most. Scenario analysis highlighted that a combined approach of reducing costs and increasing income, particularly in the absence of District Blindness Control Society subsidy, could improve the financial sustainability of the Vision Centre.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vision center-based prevention of blindness and vision impairment programs, combined with home screening, is effective clinically and economically.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yesha Gupta, Shruti Kakkar, Bolajoko A Adewara, Amita S Verma, Ritesh Verma
Purpose: Patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) are at risk of neuroretinal changes due to chronic anemia, hypoxia, iron overload, and chelation therapy. This study aims to compare central macular thickness (CMT), macular ganglion cell layer thickness (GCL), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in TDT patients with controls.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 170 eyes of 85 TDT patients between 5 and 30 years and 170 eyes of 85 controls with similar age ranges and sex distribution. Demographic characteristics, systemic characteristics, and SD-OCT-measured CMT, GCL thickness, and global and quadrant-wise peripapillary RNFL thickness were recorded.
Results: There were 52 (61.2%) male and 33 (38.8%) female cases and 36 (42.4%) male and 49 (57.6%) female controls. The median age of TDT patients was 18 years (range: 6-30 years), while that of the controls was 21 years (range: 7-28 years). The mean GCL (P = 0.002) and global (P = 0.008), inferior (P = 0.013), temporal (P = 0.016), and nasal (P = 0.023) RNFLs were thicker in controls than in TDT patients. There was no difference in CMT (P = 0.495) and superior RNFL (P = 0.303) between TDT patients and controls.
Conclusion: While no significant differences were observed in CMT or superior RNFL between the two groups, controls demonstrated greater GCL and RNFL thickness in three quadrants compared to TDT patients. These findings suggest the possibility of subtle neuroretinal alterations in TDT that may not yet be clinically evident. Larger longitudinal studies are recommended to validate these findings.
{"title":"Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography characteristics in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia.","authors":"Yesha Gupta, Shruti Kakkar, Bolajoko A Adewara, Amita S Verma, Ritesh Verma","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2485_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2485_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) are at risk of neuroretinal changes due to chronic anemia, hypoxia, iron overload, and chelation therapy. This study aims to compare central macular thickness (CMT), macular ganglion cell layer thickness (GCL), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in TDT patients with controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study of 170 eyes of 85 TDT patients between 5 and 30 years and 170 eyes of 85 controls with similar age ranges and sex distribution. Demographic characteristics, systemic characteristics, and SD-OCT-measured CMT, GCL thickness, and global and quadrant-wise peripapillary RNFL thickness were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 52 (61.2%) male and 33 (38.8%) female cases and 36 (42.4%) male and 49 (57.6%) female controls. The median age of TDT patients was 18 years (range: 6-30 years), while that of the controls was 21 years (range: 7-28 years). The mean GCL (P = 0.002) and global (P = 0.008), inferior (P = 0.013), temporal (P = 0.016), and nasal (P = 0.023) RNFLs were thicker in controls than in TDT patients. There was no difference in CMT (P = 0.495) and superior RNFL (P = 0.303) between TDT patients and controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While no significant differences were observed in CMT or superior RNFL between the two groups, controls demonstrated greater GCL and RNFL thickness in three quadrants compared to TDT patients. These findings suggest the possibility of subtle neuroretinal alterations in TDT that may not yet be clinically evident. Larger longitudinal studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gülsüm G Bozhöyük, Pınar B Kızıltunç, Huban Atilla
Purpose: To compare a newly developed virtual reality-based perimeter (Oculera visual field analyzer) with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Methods: In this study, 30 eyes of 15 IIH patients were randomly tested with HFA (24-2, SITA Standard) and Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive) on the same visit. Test durations, global indices [visual field index (VFI), mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD)], and false negative and positive user responses were compared. Spearman correlation was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Correlation analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between the measurements of the two devices in terms of the global indices (VFI, MD, and PSD) and test duration (r = 0.361, P = 0.050; r = 0.395, P = 0.031; r = 0.408, P = 0.025; and r = 0.363, P = 0.049, respectively). The Oculera was within an acceptable range for 83.3% of eyes, considering the MD reproducibility of 1.5-4 dB for HFA. No significant difference was found between the devices in false positive and negative responses (P = 0.098 and P = 0.395, respectively).
Conclusions: Standard automated perimetry is the gold standard for detecting visual field defects, but it is costly and requires prolonged attention and stable fixation. The results of the Oculera, produced with virtual reality technology, were found to be consistent with those of the HFA, and its much lower cost and portability suggest that it has the potential to be an alternative to conventional perimeters.
目的:比较新开发的基于虚拟现实的视野分析仪(Oculera视野分析仪)与Humphrey视野分析仪(HFA)在特发性颅内高压(IIH)患者中的应用。设计:横断面研究。方法:本研究对15例IIH患者30只眼进行HFA (24-2, SITA Standard)和Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive)的随机检查。比较测试持续时间、全局指数[视野指数(VFI)、平均偏差(MD)和模式标准差(PSD)]以及假阴性和阳性用户反应。采用Spearman相关进行统计分析。结果:相关分析显示,两种设备测量的整体指标(VFI、MD、PSD)与测试时间的相关性均有统计学意义(r = 0.361, P = 0.050; r = 0.395, P = 0.031; r = 0.408, P = 0.025; r = 0.363, P = 0.049)。考虑到HFA的MD再现性为1.5-4 dB, Oculera在83.3%的眼睛中处于可接受范围内。假阳性反应与阴性反应在两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.098、P = 0.395)。结论:标准自动视野检查是检测视野缺陷的金标准,但成本高,需要长时间的注意和稳定的注视。使用虚拟现实技术制作的Oculera的结果与HFA的结果一致,其更低的成本和可移植性表明它有可能成为传统周界的替代品。
{"title":"Comparison of virtual reality-based portable perimetry and conventional perimetry in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Gülsüm G Bozhöyük, Pınar B Kızıltunç, Huban Atilla","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_416_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_416_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare a newly developed virtual reality-based perimeter (Oculera visual field analyzer) with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 30 eyes of 15 IIH patients were randomly tested with HFA (24-2, SITA Standard) and Oculera (24-2, Oculera Interactive) on the same visit. Test durations, global indices [visual field index (VFI), mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD)], and false negative and positive user responses were compared. Spearman correlation was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between the measurements of the two devices in terms of the global indices (VFI, MD, and PSD) and test duration (r = 0.361, P = 0.050; r = 0.395, P = 0.031; r = 0.408, P = 0.025; and r = 0.363, P = 0.049, respectively). The Oculera was within an acceptable range for 83.3% of eyes, considering the MD reproducibility of 1.5-4 dB for HFA. No significant difference was found between the devices in false positive and negative responses (P = 0.098 and P = 0.395, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standard automated perimetry is the gold standard for detecting visual field defects, but it is costly and requires prolonged attention and stable fixation. The results of the Oculera, produced with virtual reality technology, were found to be consistent with those of the HFA, and its much lower cost and portability suggest that it has the potential to be an alternative to conventional perimeters.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145911331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-29DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_130_25
Geeta Shrikar Pardeshi, Mubashshera F Khan, Parul Chawla Gupta, Vandana Akshay Iyer, Chanchal Goyal, Aravind P Gandhi
This study aimed to generate national-level pooled estimates of effective Cataract Surgical Coverage (eCSC)and Relative Quality Gap (RQG) and describe heterogeneity in these estimates across India. We registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (ID-CRD42024609587). We conducted and reported the systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase identified studies in India published until November 4, 2024. Population-based cross-sectional and cohort studies reporting Cataract Surgical Coverage (CSC) and eCSC were included. Study characteristics and estimates were extracted, and quality was assessed using the JBI tool for prevalence studies. We estimated the pooled CSC, eCSC and RQG using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird estimator) and performed the subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity assessment (I² statistic) using R. Seven studies were included in the systematic review, and four studies (34 survey reports) in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates for CSC [57% (95% CI: 52% to 61%)], eCSC [36% (95% CI: 32% to 40%)], and RQG [37% (95% CI: 33%-40%)] showed high heterogeneity (I² >90%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated regional differences for the coverage rates (P < 0.001), with the Northeast showing low coverage rates and low heterogeneity (CSC:36%, 95% CI (32%-42%), I2 = 0%; eCSC: 23%, 95% CI (16%-31%), I2 = 12.6%]. Low CSC, eCSC, and high RQG indicate that quality improvement must accompany efforts to increase coverage. High heterogeneity supports a decentralized, district-focused approach. A task force addressing barriers in the Northeast region could reduce regional inequities.
{"title":"Regional disparities in effective cataract surgical coverage and relative quality gap in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Geeta Shrikar Pardeshi, Mubashshera F Khan, Parul Chawla Gupta, Vandana Akshay Iyer, Chanchal Goyal, Aravind P Gandhi","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_130_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_130_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to generate national-level pooled estimates of effective Cataract Surgical Coverage (eCSC)and Relative Quality Gap (RQG) and describe heterogeneity in these estimates across India. We registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (ID-CRD42024609587). We conducted and reported the systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase identified studies in India published until November 4, 2024. Population-based cross-sectional and cohort studies reporting Cataract Surgical Coverage (CSC) and eCSC were included. Study characteristics and estimates were extracted, and quality was assessed using the JBI tool for prevalence studies. We estimated the pooled CSC, eCSC and RQG using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird estimator) and performed the subgroup analyses and sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity assessment (I² statistic) using R. Seven studies were included in the systematic review, and four studies (34 survey reports) in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates for CSC [57% (95% CI: 52% to 61%)], eCSC [36% (95% CI: 32% to 40%)], and RQG [37% (95% CI: 33%-40%)] showed high heterogeneity (I² >90%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated regional differences for the coverage rates (P < 0.001), with the Northeast showing low coverage rates and low heterogeneity (CSC:36%, 95% CI (32%-42%), I2 = 0%; eCSC: 23%, 95% CI (16%-31%), I2 = 12.6%]. Low CSC, eCSC, and high RQG indicate that quality improvement must accompany efforts to increase coverage. High heterogeneity supports a decentralized, district-focused approach. A task force addressing barriers in the Northeast region could reduce regional inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"74 1","pages":"14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_676_25
Ante Krešo, Nora Perišić, Karla Katić, Anita Rančić, Ljubo Znaor
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fluorescein on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The study compared IOP readings with and without fluorescein to determine its influence on measurement accuracy in clinical practice.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 39 patients (78 eyes). IOP was measured three times under each condition: fluorescein-free with green light and fluorescein-aided with cobalt blue light. The prespecified primary comparison was between the first fluorescein-free reading and the first fluorescein-aided reading, separated by approximately 1 minute (the time needed to apply fluorescein). Statistical analysis (repeated-measures ANOVA for within-series change; Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for paired comparisons) was used to compare measurements, while corneal astigmatism, keratometry, and central corneal thickness were assessed for their potential influence on discrepancies. A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with >3.0 D corneal astigmatism was conducted.
Results: No significant difference was found between the first fluorescein-free and first fluorescein-aided IOP measurements (Wilcoxon P = 0.75; mean difference +0.04 mmHg). Consecutive measurements showed significant IOP reductions within each group, attributed to mechanical effects of the tonometer (repeated-measures ANOVA P < 0.01). Corneal parameters, including central corneal thickness and keratometry, did not significantly affect the differences. Results were unchanged after excluding patients with >3.0 D astigmatism.
Conclusions: Fluorescein does not significantly affect IOP measurements using GAT, supporting fluorescein-free measurement as a viable alternative in routine practice. Further research is needed to evaluate its application in cases of high astigmatism or altered corneal geometry.
背景:本研究旨在评价荧光素对Goldmann眼压计(GAT)测量眼压(IOP)的影响。本研究比较了使用荧光素和不使用荧光素的IOP读数,以确定其在临床实践中对测量精度的影响。方法:横断面研究纳入39例患者(78眼)。在每种条件下测量IOP三次:无荧光素的绿光和荧光素辅助的钴蓝光。预先指定的主要比较是在第一次无荧光素读数和第一次荧光素辅助读数之间,间隔约1分钟(应用荧光素所需的时间)。采用统计分析(序列内变化的重复测量方差分析;成对比较的Wilcoxon符号秩检验)来比较测量结果,同时评估角膜散光、角膜测量和角膜中央厚度对差异的潜在影响。对排除>3.0 D角膜散光患者进行敏感性分析。结果:第一次无荧光素和第一次荧光素辅助IOP测量无显著差异(Wilcoxon P = 0.75;平均差+0.04 mmHg)。连续测量显示,由于眼压计的机械效应,各组的眼压明显降低(重复测量方差分析P < 0.01)。角膜参数,包括角膜中央厚度和角膜密度,对差异没有显著影响。排除>3.0 D散光患者后,结果不变。结论:荧光素对GAT测量IOP没有显著影响,支持无荧光素测量作为常规实践中可行的替代方法。需要进一步的研究来评估其在高度散光或角膜几何形状改变的情况下的应用。
{"title":"Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with and without fluorescein using Goldmann applanation tonometry.","authors":"Ante Krešo, Nora Perišić, Karla Katić, Anita Rančić, Ljubo Znaor","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_676_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_676_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fluorescein on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The study compared IOP readings with and without fluorescein to determine its influence on measurement accuracy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 39 patients (78 eyes). IOP was measured three times under each condition: fluorescein-free with green light and fluorescein-aided with cobalt blue light. The prespecified primary comparison was between the first fluorescein-free reading and the first fluorescein-aided reading, separated by approximately 1 minute (the time needed to apply fluorescein). Statistical analysis (repeated-measures ANOVA for within-series change; Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for paired comparisons) was used to compare measurements, while corneal astigmatism, keratometry, and central corneal thickness were assessed for their potential influence on discrepancies. A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with >3.0 D corneal astigmatism was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found between the first fluorescein-free and first fluorescein-aided IOP measurements (Wilcoxon P = 0.75; mean difference +0.04 mmHg). Consecutive measurements showed significant IOP reductions within each group, attributed to mechanical effects of the tonometer (repeated-measures ANOVA P < 0.01). Corneal parameters, including central corneal thickness and keratometry, did not significantly affect the differences. Results were unchanged after excluding patients with >3.0 D astigmatism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fluorescein does not significantly affect IOP measurements using GAT, supporting fluorescein-free measurement as a viable alternative in routine practice. Further research is needed to evaluate its application in cases of high astigmatism or altered corneal geometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"93-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To evaluate changes in ocular surface parameters, contrast sensitivity (CS), and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in patients with computer vision syndrome (CVS)/digital eye strain (DES), and to assess associations among these factors.
Methods: Both eyes of 55 CVS cases (CVS-Q score ≥ 6) and 55 age-matched controls (18-40 years) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/6 were enrolled. Participants with ocular comorbidities were excluded. Central and peripheral CS were assessed using the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart and Spaeth-Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS). Dry eye disease (DED) workup was performed. HOAs were measured using a wavefront aberrometer (iDesign® Refractive Studio, Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.).
Results: PR scores were identical across groups. SPARCS revealed significantly reduced total CS scores (central and peripheral) in the CVS group (W = 3641.000, P < 0.001), highlighting its sensitivity to subtle CS changes. The CVS group showed significantly higher HOA values (%), root mean square HOA error (P < 0.001), and spherical aberration (P = 0.033), along with more severe DED findings.
Conclusion: CVS/DES leads to impaired visual function due to reduced CS, increased HOAs, and dry eye. Assessment of both central and peripheral CS provides a more complete understanding of its impact on visual quality and daily functioning. Early ergonomic interventions and preventive strategies are vital for protecting ocular health in an increasingly digital world.
目的:评价计算机视觉综合征(CVS)/数字眼疲劳(DES)患者的眼表参数、对比敏感度(CS)和高阶像差(HOAs)的变化,并评估这些因素之间的相关性。设计:前瞻性观察性病例对照研究。方法:55例CVS- q评分≥6的双眼患者和55例年龄匹配的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为6/6的对照组(18-40岁)。排除有眼部合并症的受试者。采用Pelli-Robson (PR)图和spaath - richman对比敏感性试验(SPARCS)评估中枢和外周CS。进行干眼病(DED)检查。采用波前像差仪(idedesign®Refractive Studio, Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.)测量hoa。结果:PR得分各组相同。SPARCS显示CVS组的总CS评分(中央和外周)显著降低(W = 3641.000, P < 0.001),突出了其对细微CS变化的敏感性。CVS组的HOA值(%)、HOA均方根误差(P < 0.001)和球差(P = 0.033)均显著高于对照组,且DED更为严重。结论:CVS/DES导致视功能受损,主要是由于CS降低、HOAs升高和干眼。对中枢和外周CS的评估可以更全面地了解其对视觉质量和日常功能的影响。在日益数字化的世界中,早期人体工程学干预措施和预防战略对于保护眼健康至关重要。
{"title":"Associations between ocular surface parameters, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations in computer vision syndrome.","authors":"Varnika A Singh, Parul Ichhpujani, Tanu Singh, Suresh Kumar, Navdeep Kaur","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1441_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1441_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in ocular surface parameters, contrast sensitivity (CS), and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in patients with computer vision syndrome (CVS)/digital eye strain (DES), and to assess associations among these factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational case-control study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both eyes of 55 CVS cases (CVS-Q score ≥ 6) and 55 age-matched controls (18-40 years) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/6 were enrolled. Participants with ocular comorbidities were excluded. Central and peripheral CS were assessed using the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart and Spaeth-Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS). Dry eye disease (DED) workup was performed. HOAs were measured using a wavefront aberrometer (iDesign® Refractive Studio, Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PR scores were identical across groups. SPARCS revealed significantly reduced total CS scores (central and peripheral) in the CVS group (W = 3641.000, P < 0.001), highlighting its sensitivity to subtle CS changes. The CVS group showed significantly higher HOA values (%), root mean square HOA error (P < 0.001), and spherical aberration (P = 0.033), along with more severe DED findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CVS/DES leads to impaired visual function due to reduced CS, increased HOAs, and dry eye. Assessment of both central and peripheral CS provides a more complete understanding of its impact on visual quality and daily functioning. Early ergonomic interventions and preventive strategies are vital for protecting ocular health in an increasingly digital world.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"74 1","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-29DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3122_24
Daniel Romero, Rubén Toledano, Alicia Cárceles, Carlos E Monera, Claudia P Tarazona
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparability of two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, Anterion and IOLMaster 700. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed articles published until October 1, 2023. Eligibility criteria included a comparative study design, absence of ocular diseases except cataract or refractive errors, same day measurements with both devices, and outcomes such as axial length (AL), mean keratometry, astigmatism vectors, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness, lens thickness (LT), corneal diameter, white-to-white (WTW), and intraocular lens (IOL) power for emmetropia. This systematic review incorporated 17 studies (2943 eyes). The mean difference of AL measurements obtained with Anterion and IOLMaster 700 was -0.01 [-0.09; 0.06]. Anterion provided a significantly larger ACD (0.10 mm [0.08-0.12 mm]) and LT (0.04 mm [0.01; 0.07]), while IOLMaster 700 had significantly larger WTW measurements (0.20 mm [-0.24; -0.16]). Corneal measurements tend to be flatter for Anterion, although no significant differences were found between devices. In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in WTW, LT, and ACD measurements between devices. AL measurements were comparable between biometers. Anterior mean and steep and flat keratometry tend to be higher with IOLMaster700. These differences may result in a higher IOL power for emmetropia when data are entered from Anterion measurements. Future studies will be needed to establish the influence of these differences on the refractive predictability of IOL power calculation.
{"title":"Comparison meta-analysis of two swept-source optical coherence biometers.","authors":"Daniel Romero, Rubén Toledano, Alicia Cárceles, Carlos E Monera, Claudia P Tarazona","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_3122_24","DOIUrl":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_3122_24","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparability of two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, Anterion and IOLMaster 700. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed articles published until October 1, 2023. Eligibility criteria included a comparative study design, absence of ocular diseases except cataract or refractive errors, same day measurements with both devices, and outcomes such as axial length (AL), mean keratometry, astigmatism vectors, anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness, lens thickness (LT), corneal diameter, white-to-white (WTW), and intraocular lens (IOL) power for emmetropia. This systematic review incorporated 17 studies (2943 eyes). The mean difference of AL measurements obtained with Anterion and IOLMaster 700 was -0.01 [-0.09; 0.06]. Anterion provided a significantly larger ACD (0.10 mm [0.08-0.12 mm]) and LT (0.04 mm [0.01; 0.07]), while IOLMaster 700 had significantly larger WTW measurements (0.20 mm [-0.24; -0.16]). Corneal measurements tend to be flatter for Anterion, although no significant differences were found between devices. In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in WTW, LT, and ACD measurements between devices. AL measurements were comparable between biometers. Anterior mean and steep and flat keratometry tend to be higher with IOLMaster700. These differences may result in a higher IOL power for emmetropia when data are entered from Anterion measurements. Future studies will be needed to establish the influence of these differences on the refractive predictability of IOL power calculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"74 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145850027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}