Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-14
Dmytro Vysotsky
Problem setting. The need to transition the economy of Ukraine to an innovative model of further development is dictated by the realities of today. The unsatisfactory state of innovative activity of the majority of economic entities of Ukraine is primarily explained by the limited financial resources aimed at investing in the implementation of innovative projects. The regulatory and legal acts adopted over the last several decades, which determine the legal basis of state support for innovative activity, do not contain an effective legal mechanism for providing subjects of innovative activity with affordable financial and other support for innovative projects. The main legislative acts in the field of innovative activity are unclear and inconsistent, which makes it impossible for economic entities to receive financial support for the implementation of their innovative projects. Purpose of the research is to study the problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities and the development of legislative proposals to improve such types of state support for subjects of innovative activity as financial support for the implementation of innovative projects and preferential taxation. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The study of the legal provision of state support for innovative activities is devoted to the works of various authors, in particular: Yu.E. Atamanova, S.V. Hlibko, O.V. Rozgon, Yu.V. Georgievskogo and others. However, the majority of research is purely economic in nature and is not closely “linked” to current national and foreign legislation. Article’s main body. The article is devoted to the main problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities. The work examines the main types of financial and tax support for subjects of innovative activity. Certain “gaps” were identified in the Law of Ukraine “On Innovative Activities” in terms of defining the legal mechanism for providing such type of financial support for innovative activities as crediting innovative projects. The author of the article established the inconsistency of the provisions of the Charter of the State Innovative Financial and Credit Institution with the main purpose of this type of financial support for innovative activities, such as the provision of state guarantees to banks providing loans for innovative projects. Legislative proposals have been developed to improve certain types of financial support for innovative activities, such as preferential lending, provision of state guarantees to commercial banks that provide loans for innovative projects, property insurance for the implementation of innovative projects, and financial leasing. It is proposed to improve the legislative criteria for competitive selection of innovative projects with the aim of providing certain types of financial support to subjects of innovative activity. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the legal regime of state support for innovative acti
{"title":"Legal Security of State Support of Innovative Activities","authors":"Dmytro Vysotsky","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-14","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The need to transition the economy of Ukraine to an innovative model of further development is dictated by the realities of today. The unsatisfactory state of innovative activity of the majority of economic entities of Ukraine is primarily explained by the limited financial resources aimed at investing in the implementation of innovative projects. The regulatory and legal acts adopted over the last several decades, which determine the legal basis of state support for innovative activity, do not contain an effective legal mechanism for providing subjects of innovative activity with affordable financial and other support for innovative projects. The main legislative acts in the field of innovative activity are unclear and inconsistent, which makes it impossible for economic entities to receive financial support for the implementation of their innovative projects. Purpose of the research is to study the problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities and the development of legislative proposals to improve such types of state support for subjects of innovative activity as financial support for the implementation of innovative projects and preferential taxation. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The study of the legal provision of state support for innovative activities is devoted to the works of various authors, in particular: Yu.E. Atamanova, S.V. Hlibko, O.V. Rozgon, Yu.V. Georgievskogo and others. However, the majority of research is purely economic in nature and is not closely “linked” to current national and foreign legislation. Article’s main body. The article is devoted to the main problems of legal support of state support for innovative activities. The work examines the main types of financial and tax support for subjects of innovative activity. Certain “gaps” were identified in the Law of Ukraine “On Innovative Activities” in terms of defining the legal mechanism for providing such type of financial support for innovative activities as crediting innovative projects. The author of the article established the inconsistency of the provisions of the Charter of the State Innovative Financial and Credit Institution with the main purpose of this type of financial support for innovative activities, such as the provision of state guarantees to banks providing loans for innovative projects. Legislative proposals have been developed to improve certain types of financial support for innovative activities, such as preferential lending, provision of state guarantees to commercial banks that provide loans for innovative projects, property insurance for the implementation of innovative projects, and financial leasing. It is proposed to improve the legislative criteria for competitive selection of innovative projects with the aim of providing certain types of financial support to subjects of innovative activity. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the legal regime of state support for innovative acti","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127570041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-5
O. Korvat
Problem setting. The scientific work is devoted to the study of the economic and legal aspects of the modernization of e-government in Ukraine into a digital ecosystem to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Aspects of the functioning and development of e-government and the problems of transforming governance into digital attract the attention of researchers from Ukraine. However, the topic of e-government as an ecosystem is not analyzed at all in the publications of domestic scientists. Theoretical and practical aspects of the ecosystem approach as a direction of digitalization of public administration are revealed in the works of foreign authors and public documents of international organizations. Purpose of the research is to analyze the state of e-governance in Ukraine and develop recommendations for improving the regulatory framework for the digital transformation of national governance to an ecosystem model. Article’s main body. The expediency of the ecosystem approach in digital governance is due to the need for state regulation of digital ecosystems. The ecosystem model of governance is based on digital technologies, and the electronic model is based on information and communication technologies. An e-government ecosystem is a complex sociotechnical system that unites citizens, businesses, organizations and authorities and uses electronic platforms to create value and distribute it among its participants. Electronic governance in Ukraine is gradually moving towards its organization as an ecosystem. Today, several dozen digital transformation projects are being developed in Ukraine to automate relations in the government system. However, cyber security experts identified significant problems in the Diya digital project, in particular problems with personal data protection, openness and transparency of digital transformations. Сitizens play a key role in digital public administration, so the goal of human development and protection of their rights should be enshrined in legislation as a priority during digital transformations. Innovative management technologies provide significant opportunities in management, but are risky. The need for thorough research and legal regulation of innovative solutions before their introduction into government processes is emphasized. It is proposed to establish responsibility for the security of data and processes in the digital ecosystem of governance. Conclusions and prospects for development. Legislation and legal acts related to the informatization and digitization of government, economy and society in Ukraine need to be updated taking into account the priority goals of human development and the protection of their rights, the need to increase the level of cyber security and data protection, the development of competitive programs for the automation of the will of citizens, the implementation of the principles of openness and transparency state bodies,
{"title":"Development of Electronic Governance to a Digital Ecosystem","authors":"O. Korvat","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-5","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The scientific work is devoted to the study of the economic and legal aspects of the modernization of e-government in Ukraine into a digital ecosystem to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Aspects of the functioning and development of e-government and the problems of transforming governance into digital attract the attention of researchers from Ukraine. However, the topic of e-government as an ecosystem is not analyzed at all in the publications of domestic scientists. Theoretical and practical aspects of the ecosystem approach as a direction of digitalization of public administration are revealed in the works of foreign authors and public documents of international organizations. Purpose of the research is to analyze the state of e-governance in Ukraine and develop recommendations for improving the regulatory framework for the digital transformation of national governance to an ecosystem model. Article’s main body. The expediency of the ecosystem approach in digital governance is due to the need for state regulation of digital ecosystems. The ecosystem model of governance is based on digital technologies, and the electronic model is based on information and communication technologies. An e-government ecosystem is a complex sociotechnical system that unites citizens, businesses, organizations and authorities and uses electronic platforms to create value and distribute it among its participants. Electronic governance in Ukraine is gradually moving towards its organization as an ecosystem. Today, several dozen digital transformation projects are being developed in Ukraine to automate relations in the government system. However, cyber security experts identified significant problems in the Diya digital project, in particular problems with personal data protection, openness and transparency of digital transformations. Сitizens play a key role in digital public administration, so the goal of human development and protection of their rights should be enshrined in legislation as a priority during digital transformations. Innovative management technologies provide significant opportunities in management, but are risky. The need for thorough research and legal regulation of innovative solutions before their introduction into government processes is emphasized. It is proposed to establish responsibility for the security of data and processes in the digital ecosystem of governance. Conclusions and prospects for development. Legislation and legal acts related to the informatization and digitization of government, economy and society in Ukraine need to be updated taking into account the priority goals of human development and the protection of their rights, the need to increase the level of cyber security and data protection, the development of competitive programs for the automation of the will of citizens, the implementation of the principles of openness and transparency state bodies, ","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133594510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-12
O. Savchuk
Problem setting. The work examines issues of ecological and innovative relations to ensure the sustainable development of Ukraine. The main aspects of sustainable development are studied, namely: economic, social, ecological, innovative components. Emphasis is placed on the importance of their combination with each other, the importance and relevance of the innovative component is proven, because innovations are the basis for the growth and development of any economy. In a world where technology is dynamic, it is becoming a critical factor in competitiveness. Analysis of recent researches and publications. In particular, in this area there were publications of legal scholars: A.P. Hetman, G.V. Anisimova, V.L. Bredikhina, M.V. Krasnova, Yu.S. Shemshuchenko, N.R. Malysheva, G.N. Polyanskaya, V.G. Emelyanova, V.V. Nosik and others. Purpose of the research. However, the study that would be aimed at analyzing the normative regulation of legal relations on the use and protection of the environment in the field of innovation has not yet been, which prompted us to choose this topic of research. Article’s main body. It has been proven that in order to achieve effective legal protection and development of innovative business, it is also necessary to develop and implement new legislative acts and regulatory norms that meet the requirements of the modern economy and technological development. In addition, an important element of legal support for ecological and innovative relations is the support of technological entrepreneurship and startups. For this, special support programs can be created that provide financial support and consulting assistance for young companies engaged in the development of new technologies. Incubators and accelerators can also be created, providing support for technological entrepreneurship from the initial stage to commercial success. Cooperation between international companies, universities and scientific institutes can contribute to the development of new technologies and ensure their global distribution. Conclusions and prospects for development. In addition, it is also considered important that the achievement of the goals of sustainable development is possible only thanks to the penetration of the ecological paradigm into all spheres of human life, in other words, under the condition of general environmentalization of the economy and society. The ecological component is presented for the purposes of sustainable development and is an integral requirement for their achievement. A comparative analysis of the achievement of the goals of sustainable development and ecological economy in Ukraine, with the help of relevant indices, showed a significant lag behind the country in greening the economy and society. Special attention should be paid to ecologization of economic activity.
{"title":"Legal Issues of Environmental and Innovation Relations to Ensure Sustainable Development of Ukraine","authors":"O. Savchuk","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-12","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The work examines issues of ecological and innovative relations to ensure the sustainable development of Ukraine. The main aspects of sustainable development are studied, namely: economic, social, ecological, innovative components. Emphasis is placed on the importance of their combination with each other, the importance and relevance of the innovative component is proven, because innovations are the basis for the growth and development of any economy. In a world where technology is dynamic, it is becoming a critical factor in competitiveness. Analysis of recent researches and publications. In particular, in this area there were publications of legal scholars: A.P. Hetman, G.V. Anisimova, V.L. Bredikhina, M.V. Krasnova, Yu.S. Shemshuchenko, N.R. Malysheva, G.N. Polyanskaya, V.G. Emelyanova, V.V. Nosik and others. Purpose of the research. However, the study that would be aimed at analyzing the normative regulation of legal relations on the use and protection of the environment in the field of innovation has not yet been, which prompted us to choose this topic of research. Article’s main body. It has been proven that in order to achieve effective legal protection and development of innovative business, it is also necessary to develop and implement new legislative acts and regulatory norms that meet the requirements of the modern economy and technological development. In addition, an important element of legal support for ecological and innovative relations is the support of technological entrepreneurship and startups. For this, special support programs can be created that provide financial support and consulting assistance for young companies engaged in the development of new technologies. Incubators and accelerators can also be created, providing support for technological entrepreneurship from the initial stage to commercial success. Cooperation between international companies, universities and scientific institutes can contribute to the development of new technologies and ensure their global distribution. Conclusions and prospects for development. In addition, it is also considered important that the achievement of the goals of sustainable development is possible only thanks to the penetration of the ecological paradigm into all spheres of human life, in other words, under the condition of general environmentalization of the economy and society. The ecological component is presented for the purposes of sustainable development and is an integral requirement for their achievement. A comparative analysis of the achievement of the goals of sustainable development and ecological economy in Ukraine, with the help of relevant indices, showed a significant lag behind the country in greening the economy and society. Special attention should be paid to ecologization of economic activity.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127132528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-4
S. Sheludko
Problem setting. The banking sector plays a crucial role in the economy and therefore needs to function in a comprehensive and effective legal environment. In order to monitor compliance with current requirements, banks organize compliance offices, whose activities are regulated by numerous scattered provisions of national and international law. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The legal regulation of banking activity is constantly becoming the center of attention of practitioners, government experts and scientists, in particular E. Dmytrenko, L. Kasianenko, I. Tovkun. The legal regulation of compliance in banking and financial institutions has not yet received adequate coverage in legal studies, but certain aspects of it were considered in their works by M. Mozharovskyi, A. Mulyk, and N. Patsuriia. Purpose of the research is to systematize and analyze the sources of legal regulation of compliance in Ukrainian banks. Article’s main body. Banking activity in Ukraine is regulated by more than 2,500 regulatory and legal acts, which causes serious difficulties both for the sector itself and for regulatory and supervisory authorities. Legal norms, which form the institution of compliance, create the system, so they should be summarized using a hierarchical approach. Although the act of the highest legal force – the Constitution of Ukraine – does not directly mention either compliance or meeting the requirements in the banking sector, its individual provisions in one way or another relate to the necessity and importance of compliance with current norms: this is Art. 6, which defines the obligation to fulfill the requirements of legislation at the national level; Art. 13, 19, 41, 47, 65, which refer to personal compliance in certain spheres of public life. An important place in the system of sources of legal regulation of banking compliance is occupied by foreign legislative acts, with which Ukraine has brought national laws into compliance – in particular, documents from the EU Acquis. Thus, Directive 2015/849 specifies that banks must develop an internal compliance management policy, appoint a special manager, and can exchange information on compliance control between officials within the same bank or banking group. In 2021, for the first time, a holistic concept of the organization and operation of the compliance service within the bank was enshrined in legislation. Amendments to the Law “On Banks and Banking Activity” determine the obligation to form a compliance unit, the exclusive competence of the Bank’s Council regarding it, qualification requirements, status and powers of the Chief Compliance Manager. The leading normative document that defines the organizational and legal foundations of the service for ensuring the fulfillment of requirements is the Regulation of the NBU On the Organization of the Risk Management System in Ukrainian Banks and Banking Groups. It complements and expands the norms of the relevant Law regarding the
{"title":"Sources of Legal Regulation of Compliance in Ukrainian Banks","authors":"S. Sheludko","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-4","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The banking sector plays a crucial role in the economy and therefore needs to function in a comprehensive and effective legal environment. In order to monitor compliance with current requirements, banks organize compliance offices, whose activities are regulated by numerous scattered provisions of national and international law. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The legal regulation of banking activity is constantly becoming the center of attention of practitioners, government experts and scientists, in particular E. Dmytrenko, L. Kasianenko, I. Tovkun. The legal regulation of compliance in banking and financial institutions has not yet received adequate coverage in legal studies, but certain aspects of it were considered in their works by M. Mozharovskyi, A. Mulyk, and N. Patsuriia. Purpose of the research is to systematize and analyze the sources of legal regulation of compliance in Ukrainian banks. Article’s main body. Banking activity in Ukraine is regulated by more than 2,500 regulatory and legal acts, which causes serious difficulties both for the sector itself and for regulatory and supervisory authorities. Legal norms, which form the institution of compliance, create the system, so they should be summarized using a hierarchical approach. Although the act of the highest legal force – the Constitution of Ukraine – does not directly mention either compliance or meeting the requirements in the banking sector, its individual provisions in one way or another relate to the necessity and importance of compliance with current norms: this is Art. 6, which defines the obligation to fulfill the requirements of legislation at the national level; Art. 13, 19, 41, 47, 65, which refer to personal compliance in certain spheres of public life. An important place in the system of sources of legal regulation of banking compliance is occupied by foreign legislative acts, with which Ukraine has brought national laws into compliance – in particular, documents from the EU Acquis. Thus, Directive 2015/849 specifies that banks must develop an internal compliance management policy, appoint a special manager, and can exchange information on compliance control between officials within the same bank or banking group. In 2021, for the first time, a holistic concept of the organization and operation of the compliance service within the bank was enshrined in legislation. Amendments to the Law “On Banks and Banking Activity” determine the obligation to form a compliance unit, the exclusive competence of the Bank’s Council regarding it, qualification requirements, status and powers of the Chief Compliance Manager. The leading normative document that defines the organizational and legal foundations of the service for ensuring the fulfillment of requirements is the Regulation of the NBU On the Organization of the Risk Management System in Ukrainian Banks and Banking Groups. It complements and expands the norms of the relevant Law regarding the ","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126046089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-2
Yurii Zhornokui
Problem setting. In modern economic and legal studies one may observe the tendency of refusing the usage of traditional forms of getting speculative profit and starting to use the sphere of venture investment into innovation activities, which is caused by unstable economic situation and a high probability of unpredictable crisis phenomena. However, such instability is caused by the issue of determining the range of persons who can participate in the field of venture entrepreneurship and acquire the appropriate status. At the same time, we should analyze not only the legislation and legal doctrine in Ukraine, but also the law-enforcement practice of the EU countries and Great Britain, which is stipulated by the European integration aspirations of our country. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Nowadays, it is possible to note the imperfection of the current legislation and the inadequacy of the legal doctrine in the context of determining the parties to the studied legal relations. It is applied to both Ukraine and the EU countries and Great Britain. Although it should be noted that the countries of the European Commonwealth and especially Great Britain, compared to Ukraine, have more progressive positions in this aspect. Therefore, their experience should form the basis for the further progress of the venture sector on the territory of our country. Doctrinal results of domestic and foreign experts, such as Yu. Ye. Atamanova, O. R. Kibenko, O. E. Simson, O. P. Sushch, J. Levin, G. Sutton, A. Mancuso, although contain analysis and arguments in favor of classifying certain persons or certain organizational and legal forms as participants in venture investment relations of innovative activities, but do not give an unambiguous answer to it. Purpose of the research is to analyze of European practice and legal doctrine in regard to defining the composition of participants in venture investment relations of innovative activities and the possibility of their application in the legal reality of Ukraine. Article’s main body. The Ukrainian legislator’s approach regarding the definition of the range of subjects of innovation activities does not provide answer to the question on the criterion for classifying certain individuals or legal entities as subjects of venture investment into innovation activities. We believe that such a criterion can be the fact of a person’s participation in the process of creating a new product and bringing it to its implementation into production or other spheres of activities. Venture investment accomplished by venture funds / private equity funds is significantly different from investing into debt and share financial instruments conducted by co-investment funds or other professional asset managers. Venture funds are not the separate type of legal entity, and therefore different organizational and legal forms are used for their creation abroad – starting from a joint-stock company to a simple company. Such examples of
问题设置。在现代经济和法律研究中,人们可以观察到一种趋势,即拒绝使用传统的获取投机利润的形式,而开始将风险投资领域用于创新活动,这是由不稳定的经济形势和不可预测的危机现象的高概率造成的。但是,造成这种不稳定的原因是确定能够参与风险企业领域并获得适当地位的人的范围的问题。同时,我们不仅要分析乌克兰的立法和法律学说,还要分析欧盟国家和英国的执法实践,这是由我国的欧洲一体化愿望所规定的。分析最近的研究和出版物。当前,在确定所研究的法律关系当事人的背景下,可以注意到现行立法的不完善和法律理论的不足。它适用于乌克兰和欧盟国家以及英国。虽然需要指出的是,欧共体国家特别是英国在这方面的立场比乌克兰更为进步。因此,他们的经验应该成为我国风险投资领域进一步发展的基础。国内外专家的理论成果,如余。你们。Atamanova, O. R. Kibenko, O. E. Simson, O. P. Sushch, J. Levin, G. Sutton, A. Mancuso,虽然包含了支持将某些人或某些组织和法律形式归类为创新活动风险投资关系参与者的分析和论点,但没有给出明确的答案。研究的目的是分析欧洲的实践和法律理论,以确定创新活动的风险投资关系的参与者的组成及其在乌克兰法律现实中适用的可能性。文章的主体。乌克兰立法者关于创新活动主体范围定义的办法没有回答关于将某些个人或法律实体作为风险投资主体归类为创新活动的标准的问题。我们认为,这样一个标准可以是一个人参与创造一种新产品并将其付诸生产或其他活动领域的过程的事实。风险基金/私募股权基金进行的风险投资与共同投资基金或其他专业资产管理公司进行的债务和股票金融工具投资有很大不同。风险基金不是单独的法律实体类型,因此在国外它们的创建采用了不同的组织和法律形式——从股份公司到简单的公司。用于进行风险投资的组织和法律形式的例子有有限责任公司(美国)、有限责任合伙(英国)和Kommanditgesellshaft auf Aktien(德国)。这些组织和法律形式在公司(作为法律实体)和合伙(作为合同实体)之间占据中间地位。这一关键特征将各种特定形式的活动统一起来,是将其用于发展风险投资为创新活动的主要原因,这需要在监管原则中采取灵活的法律办法。与此同时,具体的组织和法律形式,尽管是为了在那些与风险增加有关的活动领域中使用而设立的,但具有一般的法律行为能力,可以用于法律不禁止的任何活动领域。结论及发展展望。外国立法者仍然没有完全解决风险投资领域的所有需求:1)仍然存在确保外国投资者参与风险投资市场的平等或最有利的法律条件的问题;(2)创造创业活动的税收条件和利益;3)特别关注法律实体的法律地位及其组织和法律形式(同时,几乎不关注个人,除非这些人投资于风险创业的对象,或者当它与知识产权关系领域有关,涉及财产分配和个人对相关对象的非财产权利)。
{"title":"Participants in Venture Investment Relations of Innovation Activities: European Experience and Ukrainian Legal Reality","authors":"Yurii Zhornokui","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-2","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. In modern economic and legal studies one may observe the tendency of refusing the usage of traditional forms of getting speculative profit and starting to use the sphere of venture investment into innovation activities, which is caused by unstable economic situation and a high probability of unpredictable crisis phenomena. However, such instability is caused by the issue of determining the range of persons who can participate in the field of venture entrepreneurship and acquire the appropriate status. At the same time, we should analyze not only the legislation and legal doctrine in Ukraine, but also the law-enforcement practice of the EU countries and Great Britain, which is stipulated by the European integration aspirations of our country. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Nowadays, it is possible to note the imperfection of the current legislation and the inadequacy of the legal doctrine in the context of determining the parties to the studied legal relations. It is applied to both Ukraine and the EU countries and Great Britain. Although it should be noted that the countries of the European Commonwealth and especially Great Britain, compared to Ukraine, have more progressive positions in this aspect. Therefore, their experience should form the basis for the further progress of the venture sector on the territory of our country. Doctrinal results of domestic and foreign experts, such as Yu. Ye. Atamanova, O. R. Kibenko, O. E. Simson, O. P. Sushch, J. Levin, G. Sutton, A. Mancuso, although contain analysis and arguments in favor of classifying certain persons or certain organizational and legal forms as participants in venture investment relations of innovative activities, but do not give an unambiguous answer to it. Purpose of the research is to analyze of European practice and legal doctrine in regard to defining the composition of participants in venture investment relations of innovative activities and the possibility of their application in the legal reality of Ukraine. Article’s main body. The Ukrainian legislator’s approach regarding the definition of the range of subjects of innovation activities does not provide answer to the question on the criterion for classifying certain individuals or legal entities as subjects of venture investment into innovation activities. We believe that such a criterion can be the fact of a person’s participation in the process of creating a new product and bringing it to its implementation into production or other spheres of activities. Venture investment accomplished by venture funds / private equity funds is significantly different from investing into debt and share financial instruments conducted by co-investment funds or other professional asset managers. Venture funds are not the separate type of legal entity, and therefore different organizational and legal forms are used for their creation abroad – starting from a joint-stock company to a simple company. Such examples of","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133822471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-25DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-9
Illia Mamaiev
Problem setting. In May 2019, the European Parliament and the Council adopted the 2019/770 Directive «On Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services», which came into force for EU Member States on January 1, 2022. The outlined directive makes many changes in the legal relationship between consumers and suppliers of digital content or services, which performs several positive functions at once: 1) elimination of legal gaps in the defined field; 2) improvement of consumer protection as a more vulnerable side of legal relations; 3) harmonization of disparate national regulation on a single approach; 4) promoting interstate economic relations through reducing market barriers. It is fair to point out that Ukraine also needs to eliminate the above problems. In addition to the need for national legislation on the Acquis of the European Union, the adaptation of domestic regulation to the above directive should contribute to the development of the digital market and to increase legal certainty for both consumers and for suppliers of digital content or services. In some of the latest works, the author conducted a comparative analysis of the regulation of personal data between Directive 2019/770 and the draft Law of Ukraine on Digital Content and Digital Services No. 6576 of 31.01.2022, which was already adopted as a basis and has on the basis The purpose of implementing the provisions of the said directive into national law. This work will focus on the study of another aspect of these normative legal acts-the question of modification of digital content and digital services. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The following researchers have studied the issue of modifying digital content and digital services: C. J., Martínez, M. Farinha, L. M. Savanets, K. V. Efremova, G. M. Stakhira, K. G. Nekit Purpose of the research is to provide a legal interpretation of the modification of digital content and digital services, in which it is necessary to find out the definition of this concept, the legal grounds for such modification, its types, as well as the rights, responsibilities and responsibilities related to the modification process. The additional purpose of the article is to compare certain provisions of the Directive 2019/770 with the draft Law of Ukraine No. 6576 of 31.01.2022. Article’s main body. In this scientific work, a study of the legal regulation of the issue of modification of digital content and (or) digital services was carried out in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2019/770 «On Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for The Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services» and in comparison with the draft law «On Digital Content and Digital Services» No. 6576 dated January 31, 2022. The main goal of the article is to clarify the legal interpretation of this concept and analyze the compliance of the normative provisions in the cited normative legal acts. The definition of «modifi
问题设置。2019年5月,欧洲议会和理事会通过了2019/770指令《关于数字内容和数字服务供应合同的某些方面》,该指令将于2022年1月1日对欧盟成员国生效。概述的指令对数字内容或服务的消费者和供应商之间的法律关系进行了许多改变,这同时发挥了几个积极的作用:1)消除了所定义领域的法律空白;2)完善消费者保护这一法律关系中较为薄弱的环节;3)以单一方式协调不同的国家监管;4)通过减少市场壁垒促进国家间经济关系。需要指出的是,乌克兰也需要消除上述问题。除了需要就欧洲联盟的Acquis问题制定国家立法外,根据上述指令调整国内监管应有助于数字市场的发展,并为消费者和数字内容或服务的供应商增加法律确定性。在一些最新的作品中,作者对2019/770号指令与乌克兰数字内容和数字服务法草案(2022年1月31日第6576号)之间的个人数据监管进行了比较分析,该草案已被采纳为基础,并在此基础上将该指令的规定实施为国家法律。这项工作将集中研究这些规范性法律行为的另一个方面——修改数字内容和数字服务的问题。分析最近的研究和出版物。以下研究者研究了修改数字内容和数字服务的问题:C. J., Martínez, M. Farinha, L. M. Savanets, K. V. Efremova, G. M. Stakhira, K. G. Nekit研究的目的是为数字内容和数字服务的修改提供一个法律解释,其中有必要找出这一概念的定义、修改的法律依据、修改的类型以及与修改过程相关的权利、责任和义务。该条的另一个目的是将指令2019/770的某些规定与乌克兰2022年1月31日第6576号法律草案进行比较。文章的主体。在这项科学工作中,根据2019/770号《关于数字内容和数字服务供应合同的某些方面》指令的规定,并与2022年1月31日第6576号《关于数字内容和数字服务》法律草案的规定,对数字内容和(或)数字服务修改问题的法律规定进行了研究。本文的主要目的是澄清这一概念的法律解释,并分析引用的规范性法律行为中规范条款的合规性。在目标范围内确定了“修改”数字内容和服务的定义,明确了此类修改的法律依据、类型以及与修改过程相关的权利、义务和责任。除其他事项外,确定了“数字内容”和“数字服务”概念的法律解释,并分析了它们的大致列表。定义了提供数字内容和数字服务的方法。将修改数字内容和数字服务的概念视为供应商的一项权利和义务。对客观和主观遵守标准的规定进行了研究。明确违反上述合规要求的法律后果(保护消费者的手段)。考虑了赋予供应商修改数字内容权利的先决条件。提出了与用户协议(使用条款)有关的问题。它已经确定了允许修改数字内容或服务的正当理由应该理解的内容。为通知消费者引入某些修改而考虑的需求。特别是,在修改对消费者对数字内容或数字服务的访问或使用产生负面影响的情况下,定义了与使用持久信息载体通知消费者相关的细节。最后,对指令2019/770的规定与2022年1月31日第6576号法律草案的规定进行了比较,结果发现了一些重大缺陷,导致上述法律行为之间的不一致。结论及发展展望。 所进行的分析确定了“修改”的法律定义的缺失,然而,它建议在这一概念下考虑对数字内容、服务或访问它们的方法的任何修改,其特征是在保留本质的同时出现新的特征或属性。关于2019/770号指令与法律草案之间“数字内容”和“数字服务”概念之间的对应关系,可以得出结论,它们是一致的。这两种定义都具有足够的抽象性,以增加监管法律行为对数字市场快速发展的适应性。然而,该指令的文本可以让你理解大致的清单,特别是:计算机程序、应用程序、视频文件、音频文件、音乐文件、数字游戏、电子书或其他电子出版物等。研究发现,修改数字内容或服务可以被视为提供商的一项权利和法律义务。至于修改的先决条件(无论是权利还是义务),就其性质而言,它只能适用于在一定期间内向消费者提供或提供的数字内容或服务。作为一项义务,在提供商有义务确保数字内容或服务保持符合主观和客观要求的情况下,即必须进行必要的更改以防止不合规或消除已经存在的不合规行为。同时,消费者有权在不遵守规定的情况下使用所提供的保护手段。将修改作为供应商的一项权利必须以若干要求为基础,这些要求旨在确保对消费者公平的最低保障。这样做的主要前提是供应商和消费者之间签订合同(通常是“用户协议”,如“使用条款”)。在此类合同中,必须提供进行修改的正当理由(正当理由的清单并非详尽无遗,但必须符合合理性和相称性的一般原则)。此外,任何修改都必须在不增加消费者费用的情况下进行(事实证明,这不仅应被理解为增加付款的直接财务成本)。最后,必须清楚而全面地告知消费者有关修改的信息(如有必要,使用持久介质)。据发现,乌克兰法律草案尽管完全符合2019/770号指令,但仍存在许多重大不一致之处:缺乏“按合同规定更新”的主观要求,而法律草案在主观合规标准清单中包括了提供最新版本的要求,根据2019/770号指令,这是一个客观标准;供应商公开声明责任的不协调解决;在某些情况下,完全忽略了使用持久介质对修改进行适当通知的要求。
{"title":"Modification of Digital Content and Digital Services Within the Understanding of the Directive 2019/770 and Draft Law № 6576","authors":"Illia Mamaiev","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-2(42)-9","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. In May 2019, the European Parliament and the Council adopted the 2019/770 Directive «On Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services», which came into force for EU Member States on January 1, 2022. The outlined directive makes many changes in the legal relationship between consumers and suppliers of digital content or services, which performs several positive functions at once: 1) elimination of legal gaps in the defined field; 2) improvement of consumer protection as a more vulnerable side of legal relations; 3) harmonization of disparate national regulation on a single approach; 4) promoting interstate economic relations through reducing market barriers. It is fair to point out that Ukraine also needs to eliminate the above problems. In addition to the need for national legislation on the Acquis of the European Union, the adaptation of domestic regulation to the above directive should contribute to the development of the digital market and to increase legal certainty for both consumers and for suppliers of digital content or services. In some of the latest works, the author conducted a comparative analysis of the regulation of personal data between Directive 2019/770 and the draft Law of Ukraine on Digital Content and Digital Services No. 6576 of 31.01.2022, which was already adopted as a basis and has on the basis The purpose of implementing the provisions of the said directive into national law. This work will focus on the study of another aspect of these normative legal acts-the question of modification of digital content and digital services. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The following researchers have studied the issue of modifying digital content and digital services: C. J., Martínez, M. Farinha, L. M. Savanets, K. V. Efremova, G. M. Stakhira, K. G. Nekit Purpose of the research is to provide a legal interpretation of the modification of digital content and digital services, in which it is necessary to find out the definition of this concept, the legal grounds for such modification, its types, as well as the rights, responsibilities and responsibilities related to the modification process. The additional purpose of the article is to compare certain provisions of the Directive 2019/770 with the draft Law of Ukraine No. 6576 of 31.01.2022. Article’s main body. In this scientific work, a study of the legal regulation of the issue of modification of digital content and (or) digital services was carried out in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2019/770 «On Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for The Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services» and in comparison with the draft law «On Digital Content and Digital Services» No. 6576 dated January 31, 2022. The main goal of the article is to clarify the legal interpretation of this concept and analyze the compliance of the normative provisions in the cited normative legal acts. The definition of «modifi","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129294666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-12DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-4
V. Kokhan
Problems setting. The scientific work is devoted to the legal form of research infrastructures in the European Union the European Research Infrastructure Consortium. The ERIC Regulation facilitates the quicker establishment of European Research Infrastructures by saving time in avoiding the repetition of negotiations, project by project, to analyse and discuss the best legal form for such international research organisations, with related advantages and disadvantages and the time saved in avoiding discussions in each national parliament related to the approval of a needed international agreement in case the ERIC Regulation would not have existed. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The issue of the functioning of research infrastructures in the EU in the form of ERIC has been relevant in European scientific literature for the last decade. In particular, it is worth noting studies by Maria Moskovko, Arnljotur Astvaldsson and Olof Hallonsten, Carlo Rizzutto. In Ukraine, some issues of legal regulation and information support of research infrastructures were studied by Golovashchenko O.S., Lyubchych A.M., Mamayev I.O. There are no thorough studies of the legal status of research infrastructures in the national jurisprudence, which is due to the novelty of this topic in the law of Ukraine. Target of the research is to provide an overview of the dominant legal form of functioning of research infrastructures in the European Union, the history of its implementation, legal regulation, features of activity. Article’s main body. The European Research Infrastructure Consortium is a legal entity established by a decision of the European Commission. It has legal personality and full legal capacity recognized in all EU Member States. The internal structure of the European Research Infrastructures Consortium is defined in the statute by its founding countries. The ERIC legal framework can be used for new or existing research infrastructures, locally located or distributed research infrastructures. The European Research Infrastructures Consortium has been granted the status of an international organization within the EU legal system, but it is not an international organization according to the international law, as the decision to establish ERIC is taken by the European Commission. Much attention is paid to the EU legal framework that allowed the introduction of the European Research Infrastructure Consortium – Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 on the Community legal framework for the European Research Infrastructures Consortium. The article specifies the law that applies to the European Research Infrastructures Consortium. The activities of the European Research Infrastructures Consortium are governed by EU law, additionally by the national law of the Member State where it’s located, and the statute, internal documents of ERIC. The legislation of the host state is to be applied in resolving issues related to the implementation of the statutory tas
问题设置。科学工作致力于欧盟研究基础设施的法律形式,即欧洲研究基础设施联盟。ERIC法规通过避免重复谈判,节省时间来分析和讨论这些国际研究组织的最佳法律形式,以及相关的优势和劣势,从而节省时间,从而促进了欧洲研究基础设施的更快建立,避免了在每个国家议会中讨论有关批准所需国际协议的时间,以防ERIC法规不存在。分析最近的研究和出版物。在过去的十年中,欧盟研究基础设施以ERIC的形式运作的问题一直与欧洲科学文献相关。尤其值得注意的是Maria Moskovko、Arnljotur Astvaldsson和Olof Hallonsten、Carlo Rizzutto的研究。在乌克兰,Golovashchenko o.s.、Lyubchych A.M、Mamayev I.O.等学者对研究基础设施的法律规制和信息支持等问题进行了研究。由于研究基础设施的法律地位在乌克兰法律中尚属新颖性,因此在国家法理学中尚未有深入的研究。该研究的目标是提供欧盟研究基础设施功能的主要法律形式的概述,其实施的历史,法律法规,活动的特点。文章的主体。欧洲研究基础设施联盟是由欧盟委员会决定成立的法律实体。它具有欧盟所有成员国承认的法人资格和完全法律行为能力。欧洲研究基础设施联盟的内部结构由其创始国家在章程中确定。ERIC法律框架可用于新的或现有的研究基础设施,本地或分布式研究基础设施。欧洲研究基础设施联盟在欧盟法律体系内被授予国际组织的地位,但根据国际法,它不是一个国际组织,因为建立ERIC的决定是由欧盟委员会做出的。欧盟法律框架备受关注,该框架允许引入欧洲研究基础设施联盟-关于欧洲研究基础设施联盟的共同体法律框架的理事会条例(EC) No 723/2009。该条款规定了适用于欧洲研究基础设施联盟的法律。欧洲研究基础设施联盟的活动受欧盟法律管辖,此外还受其所在成员国的国家法律以及ERIC的法规和内部文件的管辖。东道国的立法将适用于解决与执行ERIC法定任务有关的问题。结论和发展前景。欧洲研究基础设施联盟法律框架的实施已经消除了阻碍欧盟成员国与其他国家的伙伴在科学领域开展合作的立法障碍。它还导致为科学活动建立了一个共同的欧洲法律框架,从而导致了欧洲研究区的发展。尽管以ERIC的形式对研究基础设施的功能进行法律规制已经过去了十多年,但它仍处于起步阶段,在应用过程中出现了一些问题。然而,ERIC形式的研究基础设施的快速建立表明,它对欧洲研究基础设施的发展和欧洲研究区的建立是有效的。
{"title":"European Research Infrastructure Consortium: The Organizational and Legal Form of Research Infrastructures in the European Union","authors":"V. Kokhan","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-4","url":null,"abstract":"Problems setting. The scientific work is devoted to the legal form of research infrastructures in the European Union the European Research Infrastructure Consortium. The ERIC Regulation facilitates the quicker establishment of European Research Infrastructures by saving time in avoiding the repetition of negotiations, project by project, to analyse and discuss the best legal form for such international research organisations, with related advantages and disadvantages and the time saved in avoiding discussions in each national parliament related to the approval of a needed international agreement in case the ERIC Regulation would not have existed. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The issue of the functioning of research infrastructures in the EU in the form of ERIC has been relevant in European scientific literature for the last decade. In particular, it is worth noting studies by Maria Moskovko, Arnljotur Astvaldsson and Olof Hallonsten, Carlo Rizzutto. In Ukraine, some issues of legal regulation and information support of research infrastructures were studied by Golovashchenko O.S., Lyubchych A.M., Mamayev I.O. There are no thorough studies of the legal status of research infrastructures in the national jurisprudence, which is due to the novelty of this topic in the law of Ukraine. Target of the research is to provide an overview of the dominant legal form of functioning of research infrastructures in the European Union, the history of its implementation, legal regulation, features of activity. Article’s main body. The European Research Infrastructure Consortium is a legal entity established by a decision of the European Commission. It has legal personality and full legal capacity recognized in all EU Member States. The internal structure of the European Research Infrastructures Consortium is defined in the statute by its founding countries. The ERIC legal framework can be used for new or existing research infrastructures, locally located or distributed research infrastructures. The European Research Infrastructures Consortium has been granted the status of an international organization within the EU legal system, but it is not an international organization according to the international law, as the decision to establish ERIC is taken by the European Commission. Much attention is paid to the EU legal framework that allowed the introduction of the European Research Infrastructure Consortium – Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 on the Community legal framework for the European Research Infrastructures Consortium. The article specifies the law that applies to the European Research Infrastructures Consortium. The activities of the European Research Infrastructures Consortium are governed by EU law, additionally by the national law of the Member State where it’s located, and the statute, internal documents of ERIC. The legislation of the host state is to be applied in resolving issues related to the implementation of the statutory tas","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117202532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-12DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-9
Victoria Sheverdina
Problem setting. The relevance of the question regarding the legal position of the manager has increased significantly at the stage of formation and development of the market organization of the economy in modern conditions. The dishonest work of managers, their abuse of their official position lead to the need for legal influence on the manager as a person who has the right to make decisions on economic activities, as well as in the field of organization and labor management. Within the scope of the manager’s responsibility, material responsibility is of particular importance, if as a result of an offense damage is caused to the employer’s property, there may be an obligation to compensate it in full or in part. A manager, as a person working under an employment contract, aware of the consequences of a labor-related property offense, must, by his voluntary and conscious actions, perform his work function in such a way as not to cause harm to the employer and his property, as well as to other employees. Material responsibility is the guarantee of such willful actions. In its essence, the financial responsibility of the manager is a problem of a larger scale than simple prevention of violations or compensation for the damage caused. The dual nature of the range of labor rights and responsibilities of a manager indicates that such an employee realizes his abilities to work by performing work related to the management and management of an enterprise, institution, organization, realizing the competence of a business entity and the legal personality of an employer. Therefore, the study of the essence of the manager’s financial responsibility is an urgent problem that needs to be solved at the scientific level. Analysis of recent researches and publications. A significant number of dissertations, monographs and periodicals are devoted to the issues of liability in labor law and the regulation of labor relations. Among them, we can highlight the scientific achievements of V. S. Venediktov, N. M. Lukashev, O. M. Lukyanchikov, I. V. Lazor, O. I. Protsevsky, S. M. Prilypka, A. M. Slyusar, N. M. Khutoryan, G. I. Chanysheva, O. V. Cherkasova, V. I. Shcherbiny, O. M. Yaroshenko, and others. Target of the research is to determine the essence of the manager’s material responsibility as a party to the employment contract. Article’s main body. The article examines the peculiarities of the legal position of the manager (enterprise, institution, organization), since he is both a body of a legal entity and an employee who is himself in an employment relationship with the owner of such a legal entity. The issue of applying material liability to him was also analyzed, taking into account the specific functions of managing a legal entity, since the legislation of Ukraine provides for a fairly high level of liability for the violation of their labor duties by such persons. In general, material responsibility is one of the types of labor law responsibility that can be ap
{"title":"Financial Liability of the Manager as Parties to the Employment Contract","authors":"Victoria Sheverdina","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-9","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The relevance of the question regarding the legal position of the manager has increased significantly at the stage of formation and development of the market organization of the economy in modern conditions. The dishonest work of managers, their abuse of their official position lead to the need for legal influence on the manager as a person who has the right to make decisions on economic activities, as well as in the field of organization and labor management. Within the scope of the manager’s responsibility, material responsibility is of particular importance, if as a result of an offense damage is caused to the employer’s property, there may be an obligation to compensate it in full or in part. A manager, as a person working under an employment contract, aware of the consequences of a labor-related property offense, must, by his voluntary and conscious actions, perform his work function in such a way as not to cause harm to the employer and his property, as well as to other employees. Material responsibility is the guarantee of such willful actions. In its essence, the financial responsibility of the manager is a problem of a larger scale than simple prevention of violations or compensation for the damage caused. The dual nature of the range of labor rights and responsibilities of a manager indicates that such an employee realizes his abilities to work by performing work related to the management and management of an enterprise, institution, organization, realizing the competence of a business entity and the legal personality of an employer. Therefore, the study of the essence of the manager’s financial responsibility is an urgent problem that needs to be solved at the scientific level. Analysis of recent researches and publications. A significant number of dissertations, monographs and periodicals are devoted to the issues of liability in labor law and the regulation of labor relations. Among them, we can highlight the scientific achievements of V. S. Venediktov, N. M. Lukashev, O. M. Lukyanchikov, I. V. Lazor, O. I. Protsevsky, S. M. Prilypka, A. M. Slyusar, N. M. Khutoryan, G. I. Chanysheva, O. V. Cherkasova, V. I. Shcherbiny, O. M. Yaroshenko, and others. Target of the research is to determine the essence of the manager’s material responsibility as a party to the employment contract. Article’s main body. The article examines the peculiarities of the legal position of the manager (enterprise, institution, organization), since he is both a body of a legal entity and an employee who is himself in an employment relationship with the owner of such a legal entity. The issue of applying material liability to him was also analyzed, taking into account the specific functions of managing a legal entity, since the legislation of Ukraine provides for a fairly high level of liability for the violation of their labor duties by such persons. In general, material responsibility is one of the types of labor law responsibility that can be ap","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125427970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-12DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-2
Dmytro Vysotsky
Problem setting. As globalization processes deepen, the state’s position on the world stage increasingly begins to be determined by its overall competitiveness, which, in turn, directly depends on the structure and efficiency of the country’s innovation system. It is the innovative system that allows the state to occupy a certain niche in the system of international division of labor, to gain weight and status in the system of international relations. The problem of increasing international competitiveness is acutely facing Ukraine. It is not by chance that the question of the prospects for the formation of a national innovation system occupies a prominent place in the economic policy of Ukraine. Analysis of recent research and publications. The study of the concept, structure and subjects of the national innovation system is devoted to the work of various authors, in particular: Yu.E. Atamanova , K. Freeman , R. Nelson, B.A. Lundvall , L.I. Fedulova, A.A. Marakhovsky , M. Т. Sharko and others. However, the majority of research is purely economic in nature and is not closely «linked» to current national and foreign legislation. Target of the research is to study the concept and structure of the national innovation system, taking into account the analysis of the main economic-theoretical and legal approaches to the definition of this concept contained in the scientific literature and current legislation. Article’s main body. The article analyzes the main approaches to defining the concept of the national innovation system. It was found that most of these approaches are purely economic in nature, which complicates their use in the current legislation. It was established that in economic theory, the national innovation system is considered in three main aspects: 1) as a set of institutions whose activities are aimed at generating and spreading innovations; 2) as a complex of related economic mechanisms and types of activities that ensure innovative processes; 3) as part of the national economic system, which ensures the organic integration of innovative processes into the progressive development of the economy and society. The article also analyzes the definition of the concept of the national innovation system, which is contained in international legal acts and the legislation of Ukraine. The analysis of the definition of the concept of the national innovation system, which is proposed in the draft Innovation Code of Ukraine, was carried out. Based on the study of the concept and structure of the national innovation system, its main features were determined, namely. The national innovation system covers a complex of economically, organizationally and legally interacting subjects, which include: subjects of scientific, scientific and technical, innovative activity, innovative infrastructure, specially authorized bodies of state power and local self-government in the field of innovative activity; the focus of the subjects of the national innovation s
问题设置。随着全球化进程的深入,一个国家在世界舞台上的地位越来越多地开始由其整体竞争力决定,而整体竞争力又直接取决于该国创新体系的结构和效率。它是一种创新的制度,使国家在国际分工体系中占有一定的地位,在国际关系体系中获得分量和地位。提高国际竞争力的问题正严峻地摆在乌克兰面前。形成国家创新体系的前景问题在乌克兰的经济政策中占据突出地位并非偶然。分析最近的研究和出版物。对国家创新体系的概念、结构和主题的研究主要集中在多位作者的工作上,特别是:Atamanova, K. Freeman, R. Nelson, ba . Lundvall, L.I. Fedulova, A.A. Marakhovsky, M. Т。Sharko和其他人。然而,大多数研究都是纯粹的经济性质,与当前的国家和外国立法没有密切的“联系”。本研究的目标是研究国家创新体系的概念和结构,同时考虑到科学文献和现行立法中对这一概念定义的主要经济理论和法律方法的分析。文章的主体。本文分析了界定国家创新体系概念的主要途径。人们发现,这些方法大多是纯粹经济性质的,这使它们在现行立法中的使用复杂化。在经济理论中,国家创新体系主要从三个方面来考虑:1)其活动旨在产生和传播创新的一整套制度;2)作为确保创新过程的相关经济机制和活动类型的综合体;3)作为国民经济体系的一部分,确保创新过程有机地融入经济和社会的逐步发展。文章还分析了国际法律文件和乌克兰立法中对国家创新体系概念的界定。对乌克兰《创新法》草案中提出的国家创新体系概念的界定进行了分析。在对国家创新体系的概念和结构进行研究的基础上,确定了国家创新体系的主要特征:国家创新体系是一个复杂的经济、组织和法律相互作用的主体,包括:科学、科学和技术主体、创新活动、创新基础设施、国家权力机构和创新活动领域的地方自治政府;国家创新体系主体的重点是直接参与、提供或刺激创新。国家创新体系主体的活动旨在开展科学研究和发展,目的是将其进一步应用于经济的各个部门(特别是实体部门)和社会领域。在研究的基础上,对国家创新系统的概念进行了适当的定义,将其定义为科学、科学和技术、创新活动、创新基础设施以及开发、提供和支持创新的国家和地方自治机构等相关主体的有序集合。对国家创新体系结构的研究备受关注。尽管确定国家创新系统结构的方法多种多样,但对国家创新系统结构的研究受到了特别的关注。界定了国家创新体系结构的主要要素,包括国家监管、教育、知识生成、创新基础设施和生产。结论及发展展望。科学文献和立法对国家创新体系的概念和结构有不同的界定方法。在各种可用的方法中,最合理的是制度方法,其实质是将国家创新系统与一系列直接或间接参与确保或实施创新活动过程的机构(组织、结构)确定起来。从法律意义上讲,国家创新体系应被理解为一套有序的相互关联的科学、科学技术、创新活动、创新基础设施以及开展创新活动的开发、提供和支持的国家和地方自治机构。
{"title":"Conceptual Approaches to Defining the Concept of a National Innovation System","authors":"Dmytro Vysotsky","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-2","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. As globalization processes deepen, the state’s position on the world stage increasingly begins to be determined by its overall competitiveness, which, in turn, directly depends on the structure and efficiency of the country’s innovation system. It is the innovative system that allows the state to occupy a certain niche in the system of international division of labor, to gain weight and status in the system of international relations. The problem of increasing international competitiveness is acutely facing Ukraine. It is not by chance that the question of the prospects for the formation of a national innovation system occupies a prominent place in the economic policy of Ukraine. Analysis of recent research and publications. The study of the concept, structure and subjects of the national innovation system is devoted to the work of various authors, in particular: Yu.E. Atamanova , K. Freeman , R. Nelson, B.A. Lundvall , L.I. Fedulova, A.A. Marakhovsky , M. Т. Sharko and others. However, the majority of research is purely economic in nature and is not closely «linked» to current national and foreign legislation. Target of the research is to study the concept and structure of the national innovation system, taking into account the analysis of the main economic-theoretical and legal approaches to the definition of this concept contained in the scientific literature and current legislation. Article’s main body. The article analyzes the main approaches to defining the concept of the national innovation system. It was found that most of these approaches are purely economic in nature, which complicates their use in the current legislation. It was established that in economic theory, the national innovation system is considered in three main aspects: 1) as a set of institutions whose activities are aimed at generating and spreading innovations; 2) as a complex of related economic mechanisms and types of activities that ensure innovative processes; 3) as part of the national economic system, which ensures the organic integration of innovative processes into the progressive development of the economy and society. The article also analyzes the definition of the concept of the national innovation system, which is contained in international legal acts and the legislation of Ukraine. The analysis of the definition of the concept of the national innovation system, which is proposed in the draft Innovation Code of Ukraine, was carried out. Based on the study of the concept and structure of the national innovation system, its main features were determined, namely. The national innovation system covers a complex of economically, organizationally and legally interacting subjects, which include: subjects of scientific, scientific and technical, innovative activity, innovative infrastructure, specially authorized bodies of state power and local self-government in the field of innovative activity; the focus of the subjects of the national innovation s","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"71 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113954176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-12DOI: 10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-8
D. Zaika
Problem setting. In the conditions of digital transformation of society, the IT sphere counts a significant number of specialists. With the beginning of full-scale aggression against Ukraine, the IT industry is one of the few that can function. Nowadays, the definition of the term «IT employee» still does not exist either in legislation or in the doctrine of labor law. Therefore, distinguishing the features of the term «IT employee» is one of the urgent problems of labor law. Analysis of recent researches and publications. In recent years, the following scholars of labor law have, to one degree or another devoted themselves to researching the concept of an IT employee: L. P. Amelicheva, S. Ya. Vavzhenchuk, V. V. Zhernakov, M. I. Inshin, L. V. Kotova, S. M. Prilypko, O. I. Protsevskyi, O. G. Sereda, A. M. Slyusar, V. L. Kostyuk, G. I. Chanysheva, V. I. Shcherbina, O. M. Yaroshenko, and others. Despite the development of a general question, there was no definition of the term «IT employee» in labor law, which determines the relevance of the choice of topic. Тarget of the research is to identify the main features of the concept of «IT employee» and to define it. In order to realize the specified goal, the following tasks were set: to investigate the concept of «IT sphere», to analyze the features of such terms as «subject of law», «subject of labor law», «employee», to distinguish the concept of «employee of the IT sphere» from the concept of «gig specialist». Article’s main body. This was achieved due to the method of analysis, which made it possible to identify the characteristics of an employee in the IT field, which are typical and atypical for other employees, subjects of labor law and subjects of law; the method of generalization, which allowed to define the concept of «IT worker» after researching the general and special features of the specified term; a comparative legal method that made it possible to compare and analyze a gig specialist and an IT employee. We have found that: (a) the general characteristics of an IT worker include the characteristics inherent in the concepts of «employee», «subject of labor law», «subject of law»; (b) a special feature of IT workers is the performance of a job function in the field of data collection, processing and transmission to obtain information of new quality and its use on the basis of computing and information technology; (c) legal regulation of IT workers and gig specialists is demarcated; (d) definition of the term «IT employee» is provided. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Thus, an IT employee is a individual person who has reached the legal age and has entered into an employment contract with an employer to perform a job function in the field of data collection, processing and transmission to obtain new quality information and use it on the basis of computing and information technology.
问题设置。在社会数字化转型的条件下,IT领域有相当数量的专家。随着对乌克兰的全面侵略的开始,IT行业是少数能够发挥作用的行业之一。如今,无论是在立法中还是在劳动法理论中,“IT员工”一词的定义仍然不存在。因此,区分“IT员工”一词的特征是劳动法亟待解决的问题之一。分析最近的研究和出版物。近年来,以下几位劳动法学者不同程度地致力于对IT员工概念的研究:L. P. Amelicheva, S. Ya。瓦夫真丘克、v·v·热尔纳科夫、m·i·因申、l·v·科托娃、s·m·普里普普科、o·i·普罗采夫斯基、o·g·谢列达、a·m·斯柳萨尔、v·l·科斯特丘克、g·i·昌尼舍娃、v·i·什切比娜、o·m·雅罗申科等。尽管发展了一般性问题,但劳动法中没有对“IT员工”一词的定义,这决定了选题的相关性。Тarget研究的目的是确定«IT员工»概念的主要特征并对其进行定义。为了实现指定的目标,确定了以下任务:调查“IT领域”的概念,分析“法律主体”、“劳动法主体”、“员工”等术语的特征,区分“IT领域员工”和“零工专家”的概念。文章的主体。这是通过分析方法实现的,该方法可以识别it领域员工的特征,这些特征对于其他员工、劳动法主体和法律主体来说是典型的和非典型的;泛化方法,在研究特定术语的一般特征和特殊特征后,可以定义“IT工作者”的概念;这是一种比较法律方法,可以比较和分析一个零工专家和一个it员工。我们发现:(a) IT工作者的一般特征包括“雇员”、“劳动法主体”、“法律主体”等概念所固有的特征;(b)资讯科技工作者的一个特点是在数据收集、处理和传输领域履行工作职能,以获取新质量的信息,并在计算和资讯技术的基础上加以利用;(c)对IT工作者和零工专家的法律监管进行界定;(d)提供术语“IT员工”的定义。结论及发展展望。因此,IT雇员是指达到法定年龄并与雇主签订雇佣合同,在数据收集、处理和传输领域履行工作职能,以获取新的高质量信息并在计算和信息技术的基础上使用它的个人。
{"title":"Separate Issues of the Definition of the IT-sphere employee as a subject of labor law","authors":"D. Zaika","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-8","url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. In the conditions of digital transformation of society, the IT sphere counts a significant number of specialists. With the beginning of full-scale aggression against Ukraine, the IT industry is one of the few that can function. Nowadays, the definition of the term «IT employee» still does not exist either in legislation or in the doctrine of labor law. Therefore, distinguishing the features of the term «IT employee» is one of the urgent problems of labor law. Analysis of recent researches and publications. In recent years, the following scholars of labor law have, to one degree or another devoted themselves to researching the concept of an IT employee: L. P. Amelicheva, S. Ya. Vavzhenchuk, V. V. Zhernakov, M. I. Inshin, L. V. Kotova, S. M. Prilypko, O. I. Protsevskyi, O. G. Sereda, A. M. Slyusar, V. L. Kostyuk, G. I. Chanysheva, V. I. Shcherbina, O. M. Yaroshenko, and others. Despite the development of a general question, there was no definition of the term «IT employee» in labor law, which determines the relevance of the choice of topic. Тarget of the research is to identify the main features of the concept of «IT employee» and to define it. In order to realize the specified goal, the following tasks were set: to investigate the concept of «IT sphere», to analyze the features of such terms as «subject of law», «subject of labor law», «employee», to distinguish the concept of «employee of the IT sphere» from the concept of «gig specialist». Article’s main body. This was achieved due to the method of analysis, which made it possible to identify the characteristics of an employee in the IT field, which are typical and atypical for other employees, subjects of labor law and subjects of law; the method of generalization, which allowed to define the concept of «IT worker» after researching the general and special features of the specified term; a comparative legal method that made it possible to compare and analyze a gig specialist and an IT employee. We have found that: (a) the general characteristics of an IT worker include the characteristics inherent in the concepts of «employee», «subject of labor law», «subject of law»; (b) a special feature of IT workers is the performance of a job function in the field of data collection, processing and transmission to obtain information of new quality and its use on the basis of computing and information technology; (c) legal regulation of IT workers and gig specialists is demarcated; (d) definition of the term «IT employee» is provided. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Thus, an IT employee is a individual person who has reached the legal age and has entered into an employment contract with an employer to perform a job function in the field of data collection, processing and transmission to obtain new quality information and use it on the basis of computing and information technology.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133246798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}