Indian heart journal最新文献

The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current research on heart-gut cross talk and its implications for cardiovascular disease. To uncover relevant preclinical and clinical research examining heart-gut cross talk, a thorough literature search was undertaken utilising electronic databases. The chosen publications were critically examined, and major findings were synthesised to offer a thorough perspective on the subject. We want to synthesise the most recent study findings, explain the underlying mechanisms, and provide potential treatment techniques. By exploring bidirectional connection between the heart and the gut, we shed light on novel future options for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The heart-gut cross talk is an exciting field of study with implications for cardiovascular disease. Understanding the complex connection between the heart and the gastrointestinal tract may lead to the development of novel therapeutic targets and therapies for the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases. Future research should concentrate on identifying the specific processes driving this crosstalk as well as assessing the efficacy of therapies targeting the gut microbiota and the gut–brain axis in improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Dyslipidaemia characterised by elevated total cholesterol/LDL-C, triglyceride or both or decreased HDL-C is an important risk factor for the development of ASCVD. Atherogenic dyslipidaemia characterised by high TG, low HDL-C and elevated small dense LDL (sdLDL) is more prevalent in Asian Indians. Normal level of TG is generally considered as <150 mg/dl. Hypertriglyceridemia is closely associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus. Goals of management of hypertriglyceridemia are to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events and reduce the risk of pancreatitis. Lifestyle modification is important. In severe hypertriglyceridemia, TG lowering pharmacotherapy is important to prevent pancreatitis. In mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia, pharmacotherapy is employed only if associated with ASCVD or high risk factors and not controlled with lifestyle modifications and statins.

Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol which estimates the cholesterol content of the atherogenic apoB containing lipoproteins, measured as total cholesterol minus HDL-C is equivalent to LDL-C in ASCVD risk assessment and superior to it in those with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia. Some international guidelines, have included measurement of non-HDL-C as primary therapeutic target for patients with ASCVD.

Low HDL cholesterol is common in Indians. Despite evidence of inverse relationship between HDL-C and cardiovascular events, HDL-C as a causative factor for development of atherosclerosis is unproven. Therapeutic strategies directed at increasing HDL-C levels have not been shown to have cardiovascular benefits and hence HDL-C is currently not a target for drug-based treatment

Solid organ transplant recipients face an increased risk of dyslipidemia, which contributes to cardiovascular complications. Commonly used drugs such as ciclosporin and tacrolimus can aggravate and cause dyslipidemia. Immunosuppressive drugs particularly ciclosporin and tacrolimus are also known to worsen dyslipidemia in transplant recipients. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors like sirolimus and everolimus also alter lipid metabolism. Lifestyle and dietary modifications should be encouraged. Careful consideration of immunosuppressant choices is also vital to control dyslipidemia. Statins are recommended as first-line agents for lipid-lowering therapy, with consideration for potential drug interactions. Other options, such as ezetimibe and nicotinic acid, may be considered as alternatives. The management of dyslipidemia in renal transplant patients mainly involves statin therapy, although the clinical effectiveness in this population is not well-documented. Lifestyle modifications, careful drug selection, and statin therapy are key components in managing dyslipidemia in solid organ transplant patients.

Background

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are often used as primary prevention strategy for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals. This study analyzed appropriate therapies, complications and inappropriate shocks in the real-world Indian population.

Methods

All patients in the cardiomyopathy cohort under follow up who had ICD implanted as a primary prevention strategy were studied. The objective was to assess the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, inappropriate therapies and complications. ICD was interrogated and stored electrograms analyzed. Underlying arrhythmia or conditions resulting in appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapy were studied. Correlation and regression studies was done to assess for the predictors of appropriate therapy.

Results

Fifty patients were followed up for a mean follow-up duration of 4.4 ± 3.1 years with total follow up of 220.2 patient years. Appropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 16 out of 50 (32%) patients, with 65 appropriate therapies (median 2 per patient, range: 0–20). Inappropriate therapy delivered in 7 of the 50 (14%) patients, with 44 inappropriate therapies (median 5 per patient, range: 0–20). Complications occurred in 8 of the 50 (16%) patients. Overall, the rate of appropriate therapy was 29.5 per 100 patient years, that of inappropriate therapy was 19.9 per 100 patient years and the rate of complications was 3.6 per 100 patient years.

Conclusions

When implanted for primary prevention in patients with cardiomyopathies over a mean period of 4.4 ± 3.1 years, appropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 32% patients. However, inappropriate therapy (14% patients) and complications (16% patients) were also common.

Lp(a) is a genetically determined, heritable, independent and causal risk factor for ASCVD. About 1 in 5 people worldwide have elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL or >125 nmol/L) whereas in Indians it is 25 %. Epidemiological, genome-wide association and mendelian randomization studies have demonstrated an association between elevated Lp(a) levels and increased incidence of myocardial infarction, aortic valve stenosis, ischemic stroke, heart failure, CV and all-cause mortality. The increased Lp(a)-mediated CV risk is mediated by pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic and pro-atherogenic processes, leading to progression of atherosclerosis and increased risk of thrombosis. Lp(a) level reaches peak by 5 years of age and remains stable over time. Levels are not much influenced by dietary and environmental factors but it can vary in certain clinical situations like thyroid diseases, chronic kidney disease, inflammation and sepsis. It should be measured at least once in life time. Cascade testing for high Lp(a) is recommended in the settings of FH, family history of (very) high Lp(a), and personal or family history of ASCVD. In the absence of specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, comprehensive risk factor management is recommended as per guidelines for individuals with elevated Lp(a). PCSK9 inhibitors and Inclisiran reduce Lp(a) by 25%. Pelacarsen is an antisense oligonucleotide and is found to reduce Lp(a) by 80%. In a recent Indian study of 1,021 CAD patients, presence of elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) correlated with severe angiographic disease. 37% of ACS patients exhibited elevated Lp(a) and it was higher in young CAD patients with FH (43%).

Patients with CKD are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Clinical studies suggest statins reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Lipid lowering therapy with statin with or without ezetemibe is recommended for most of the patients in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min and also in those who have an increased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (≥3 mg/mmol) for at least 3 months. Evidence suggests that it should not be started for hemodialysis patients without evidence of ASCVD. Patients who were already taking statins or statin/ezetimibe combination at the time of dialysis should consider continuing these medications, especially if they have ASCVD. Fibrates should not be used in conjunction with statins in patients with CKD, and ezetimibe monotherapy is also not recommended. The role of PCSK9 inhibitors is evolving suggests that it is effective in lowering LDL cholesterol without affecting the renal outcomes.

Objective

The primary objective of the study was to investigate the correlation between high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTropI) levels during hospitalization and the prognostic outcome in patients with non-acute coronary syndrome (non-ACS) acute heart failure, over a follow-up period of one year. The secondary objective was to assess and characterize acute heart failure during index hospitalization.

Methods

High sensitivity troponin I value was noted both at the time of admission and discharge. The correlation of admission hsTropI along with other parameters and risk factors with in-hospital mortality was studied. Patients of index hospitalization after discharge were followed up for one year and the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or re-hospitalization for heart failure was noted. The correlation between admission and discharge hsTropI values with the composite endpoint was then analyzed.

Results

Out of 350 patients, 38 (10.8 %) patients died during index hospitalization while 142 patients (46 %) developed composite outcomes during follow-up. Age, previous history of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, low left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic blood pressure, and high values of hsTropI above 99th percentiles were independent in-hospital mortality predictors. The value of hsTropI at the time of admission was not associated with poor composite outcome during follow-up. However, patients who showed an increasing trend of hsTropI value at the time of discharge were found to have a significant increase in the composite outcome.

Conclusion

High-sensitivity troponin I is a valuable biomarker that can predict in-hospital mortality and long-term follow-up outcomes in patients with acute heart failure. It plays a crucial role in developing improved strategies for heart failure surveillance and management in the community.

Lipid disorders are common in several endocrine conditions. Diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and Cushing's syndrome are the common endocrine disorders with dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia has a significant impact on endocrine and metabolic health and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In most cases of dyslipidemia, the suspicion of endocrine diseases must be based on clinical symptoms and signs. Optimal management of the dyslipidemia requires treatment of the underlying endocrine condition. Lipid lowering therapy is a useful adjunct or a requirement in many cases. The Indian guidelines provide a pragmatic and practical approach to the management of lipid disorders in endocrine disease, as well as endocrine vigilance with lipid therapy.

Background

Left atrial (LA) volume indexing for body surface area (BSA) is the common practice. Since LA volume index is of cardiovascular pathophysiologic significance, it is suggested that indexing for other body size parameters be explored to evaluate a more appropriate alternative method. The aims of this study were to find normal and the best cutoff values for LA volume indexed for multiple body size parameters in normal Indian subjects.

Methods

Data from the multicentric prospective INDEA study conducted through 2018 to 2020 was reviewed and subjects without known cardiac disease and completely normal echocardiograms that had the left atrial volume (LAV) measured by biplane Simpson's method were included. LAV was indexed by BSA (ml/m²), by height (LAV/m), by height raised to exponent 1.72 (mL/m ^1.72 and 2.7 (ml/m^2.7), by body weight, by ideal body weight (IBW), by ideal body surface area (IBSA) and by height squared (ml/h²).

Results

A total of 1046 healthy volunteers (382 female, 38%), mean age 38 ± 10.4 years (range 30–48 years) and body mass index 23.6 kg/m² (22–25 kg/m²) were analyzed. Mean and normal values were: LAV/BSA 18.7 + 3.15 ml/m² (range 15–21 ml/m²), LAV/ht 26.0 ± 4.5 ml/m, (range 17–35 ml/m), LAV/ht² 16 ± 2.8 ml/m² (range 10.4–21.6 ml/m²) and LAV/ht^2.7 8.71 ± 2.2 ml/m^2.7 (range 6.98–13.58 ml/m^2.7). Using ROC curve analysis, LAV/h ^1.72 had the highest AUC and the best predictive value to identify LA enlargement but not very different from LAV/BSA. Ideal BSA and ideal body weight as a denominator did not provide any incremental value.

Conclusion

Normal values for LAV indexed for height, weight, body surface area by three different methods of height as an allometric parameter are described in normal Indian individuals. We reinforce that LA volume indexation for BSA is an acceptable and robust method in non-obese Indian subjects. Indexing for height ^1.72 is probably slightly superior method to evaluate LAV.

Background

Despite significant progress in primary prevention, rates of myocardial infarction (MI) in South Asian population is alarmingly high.

Objectives

We sought to compare risk factor profiles and outcomes between individuals with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in young (<50 years) and old (≥50 years) age groups.

Methods

North India STEMI Registry (NORIN-STEMI) is a prospective observational registry of patients hospitalised with STEMI. We conducted a study of young patients (<50 years) regarding their risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD), in-hospital and 30-day mortality and compared with their older counterpart.

Results

Among 5335 patients enrolled, 1752 (32.8%) were young and were 19 years younger than the older cohort. Major risk factors in young patients were physical inactivity (75.1%) and alcohol intake (67.8%). Higher prevalence of tobacco use (66.6% vs 52.4%), but lower prevalence of diabetes (16% vs 26.3%) and hypertension (18.5% vs 29.9%) were seen in young STEMI. Young patients were less likely to die both in-hospital (5.9% vs 10.0%) and at 30-days (11.1% vs 16.2%). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% at admission [OR: 8.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.60–13.90, P < 0.001 in-hospital, OR: 3.92, 95% CI: 2.69–5.73 at 30-days] and female sex were strongest predictors of mortality.

Conclusions

Young STEMI patients constituted one-third of total cohort. Most of them were tobacco consumers with lesser prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. They were less likely to die both in-hospital and at 30 days because of earlier presentation to a health care facility and hence a relatively preserved LVEF.