Pub Date : 2024-11-04eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2024/5421129
Sriya Donthi, Jacqueline Kloos, Kelly S Gibson, Danielle Olson, David C Kaelber
Objective: The study was aimed at comparing intrapartum and postpartum outcomes between pregnant patients with and without antenatal COVID-19 infection using aggregated, deidentified electronic health record (EHR) data. Design and Setting: This retrospective cohort study included data from over 80 health care organizations within the TriNetX Analytics Research Network. Population: Individuals admitted for delivery from Jan 2020 to May 2023 were studied. Methods: We studied individuals with ICD-10 codes for delivery, COVID-19 diagnosis, and primary outcomes. We compared the incidence of adverse intrapartum and 30-day postpartum outcomes in those with and without antenatal COVID-19. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcomes compared were obstetric, cardiovascular, neurovascular, and respiratory outcomes within 30 days postpartum. Results: Twenty-six thousand nine hundred seventy-four of 369,923 (7%) birthing parents with a delivery encounter had an antenatal COVID-19 diagnosis. Compared to matched controls, having COVID-19 was associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage (RR-1.24 (CI-1.16-1.33)), gestational hypertension (RR-1.27 (CI-1.27-1.34)), preeclampsia (RR-1.25 (CI-1.18-1.32)), eclampsia (RR-1.66 (CI-1.29-2.32)), preterm labor (RR-1.21 (CI-1.21-1.34)), cerebral infarction (RR-1.74 (CI-1.04-2.90)), cardiomyopathy (RR-2.08 (CI-1.30-3.32)), heart failure (RR-1.55 (CI-1.04-2.31)), sepsis (RR-2.21 (CI-1.54-3.19)), DVT (RR-2.32 (CI-1.45-3.71)), and pulmonary embolism (RR-2.68 (CI-1.74-2.90)). Conclusion: Individuals with antenatal COVID-19 were more likely to have intrapartum and postpartum obstetric, cardiovascular, neurovascular, and respiratory complications. This data will inform risk stratification and screening for prenatal care providers.
{"title":"Intrapartum and 30-Day Postpartum Complications in Patients With Antenatal COVID-19 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Sriya Donthi, Jacqueline Kloos, Kelly S Gibson, Danielle Olson, David C Kaelber","doi":"10.1155/2024/5421129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5421129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The study was aimed at comparing intrapartum and postpartum outcomes between pregnant patients with and without antenatal COVID-19 infection using aggregated, deidentified electronic health record (EHR) data. <b>Design and Setting:</b> This retrospective cohort study included data from over 80 health care organizations within the TriNetX Analytics Research Network. <b>Population:</b> Individuals admitted for delivery from Jan 2020 to May 2023 were studied. <b>Methods:</b> We studied individuals with ICD-10 codes for delivery, COVID-19 diagnosis, and primary outcomes. We compared the incidence of adverse intrapartum and 30-day postpartum outcomes in those with and without antenatal COVID-19. <b>Main Outcome Measures:</b> The main outcomes compared were obstetric, cardiovascular, neurovascular, and respiratory outcomes within 30 days postpartum. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-six thousand nine hundred seventy-four of 369,923 (7%) birthing parents with a delivery encounter had an antenatal COVID-19 diagnosis. Compared to matched controls, having COVID-19 was associated with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage (RR-1.24 (CI-1.16-1.33)), gestational hypertension (RR-1.27 (CI-1.27-1.34)), preeclampsia (RR-1.25 (CI-1.18-1.32)), eclampsia (RR-1.66 (CI-1.29-2.32)), preterm labor (RR-1.21 (CI-1.21-1.34)), cerebral infarction (RR-1.74 (CI-1.04-2.90)), cardiomyopathy (RR-2.08 (CI-1.30-3.32)), heart failure (RR-1.55 (CI-1.04-2.31)), sepsis (RR-2.21 (CI-1.54-3.19)), DVT (RR-2.32 (CI-1.45-3.71)), and pulmonary embolism (RR-2.68 (CI-1.74-2.90)). <b>Conclusion:</b> Individuals with antenatal COVID-19 were more likely to have intrapartum and postpartum obstetric, cardiovascular, neurovascular, and respiratory complications. This data will inform risk stratification and screening for prenatal care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5421129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554409/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-30eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2024/6651272
Karen Bräutigam, Stefanie Meier, Frank Köster, Achim Rody, Ralf Hilfrich
Objective: The objective of the study is to validate a new human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 high-risk specific serological assay in a case-control study. Methods: Serum samples of 138 patients (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 2, and 3 and cervical cancer), 21 vaccinees, and 246 female controls were tested for the presence of HPV L1 high-risk specific antibodies. Results: HPV L1 high-risk antibodies were detected in 100% of the CIN1 and 2, 86.6% of the CIN3 and 82.4% of the cervical cancer cases, 100% of the vaccinees, and 3.9% of the female controls. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated with 0.91 for controls versus CIN2+, 0.923 for controls versus CIN1+, and 0.968 for controls versus CIN1/2. Conclusion: The HPV L1 high-risk specific serological lateral flow rapid test shows promising data in the field of early detection of HPV high-risk induced cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. This easy-to-use, robust, and affordable approach could offer a chance to reach women in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) that could not be reached by HPV molecular testing-based cervical cancer screening programs.
{"title":"CER818: A Highly Specific and Sensitive HPV L1 High-Risk Serological Lateral Flow Rapid Test for Early Detection of Cervical Cancer and Its Precursor Lesions.","authors":"Karen Bräutigam, Stefanie Meier, Frank Köster, Achim Rody, Ralf Hilfrich","doi":"10.1155/2024/6651272","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2024/6651272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The objective of the study is to validate a new human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 high-risk specific serological assay in a case-control study. <b>Methods:</b> Serum samples of 138 patients (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 2, and 3 and cervical cancer), 21 vaccinees, and 246 female controls were tested for the presence of HPV L1 high-risk specific antibodies. <b>Results:</b> HPV L1 high-risk antibodies were detected in 100% of the CIN1 and 2, 86.6% of the CIN3 and 82.4% of the cervical cancer cases, 100% of the vaccinees, and 3.9% of the female controls. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated with 0.91 for controls versus CIN2+, 0.923 for controls versus CIN1+, and 0.968 for controls versus CIN1/2. <b>Conclusion:</b> The HPV L1 high-risk specific serological lateral flow rapid test shows promising data in the field of early detection of HPV high-risk induced cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. This easy-to-use, robust, and affordable approach could offer a chance to reach women in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) that could not be reached by HPV molecular testing-based cervical cancer screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6651272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303054/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141897276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Early screening for cervical cancer is a key life-saving intervention in reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. Despite the high burden of cervical cancer, the coverage of cervical cancer screening is low in developing countries, including Ethiopia. There is a paucity of information on the utilization of cervical cancer screening among female health professionals in eastern Ethiopia. This study aimedto assess the determinants of cervical cancer screening among female health professionals in Harar town, eastern Ethiopia.
Method: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 232 female health professionals in Harar town from September 01 to 30, 2022. Data were entered using EpiData version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 27.0. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify significant factors for the level of cervical cancer screening. An adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval was used to report the strength of association and statistical significance declared at p value < 0.05.
Results: The prevalence of cervical cancer screening among female health professionals was 16.8% (95% CI: 11%, 22%). Higher education level (AOR = 4.28, 95% CI: 1.68, 10.90), use of contraceptives (AOR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.17, 6.23), training on cervical cancer screening (AOR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.05, 6.08), good knowledge about cervical cancer screening (AOR = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.44, 7.91), and positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening (AOR = 5.31, 95% CI: 2.04, 13.83) were independent factors that increased the utilization of cervical cancer screening.
Conclusion: One in every six female health professionals was screened for cervical cancer. Education level, contraceptive use, cervical cancer screening training, cervical cancer screening knowledge, and attitude toward cervical cancer screening were the determinants of cervical cancer screening utilization among female health professionals. Improving the health professionals' knowledge and attitude toward cervical cancer screening through upgrading their education level and training on cervical cancer screening would be essential to improving the level of cervical cancer screening.
{"title":"Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening among Female Health Professionals in Harar Town, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Yahya Abdi Ziyad, Elias Jemal, Merga Dheresa, Ahmedin Aliyi Usso, Hassen Abdi Adem, Aboma Motuma, Mohammednur Abdo Komicha, Addis Eyeberu, Sherif Abdi Yuya","doi":"10.1155/2024/1430978","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2024/1430978","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early screening for cervical cancer is a key life-saving intervention in reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. Despite the high burden of cervical cancer, the coverage of cervical cancer screening is low in developing countries, including Ethiopia. There is a paucity of information on the utilization of cervical cancer screening among female health professionals in eastern Ethiopia. This study aimedto assess the determinants of cervical cancer screening among female health professionals in Harar town, eastern Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 232 female health professionals in Harar town from September 01 to 30, 2022. Data were entered using EpiData version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 27.0. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify significant factors for the level of cervical cancer screening. An adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval was used to report the strength of association and statistical significance declared at <i>p</i> value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of cervical cancer screening among female health professionals was 16.8% (95% CI: 11%, 22%). Higher education level (AOR = 4.28, 95% CI: 1.68, 10.90), use of contraceptives (AOR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.17, 6.23), training on cervical cancer screening (AOR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.05, 6.08), good knowledge about cervical cancer screening (AOR = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.44, 7.91), and positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening (AOR = 5.31, 95% CI: 2.04, 13.83) were independent factors that increased the utilization of cervical cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in every six female health professionals was screened for cervical cancer. Education level, contraceptive use, cervical cancer screening training, cervical cancer screening knowledge, and attitude toward cervical cancer screening were the determinants of cervical cancer screening utilization among female health professionals. Improving the health professionals' knowledge and attitude toward cervical cancer screening through upgrading their education level and training on cervical cancer screening would be essential to improving the level of cervical cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1430978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182688/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141418786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-27eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2024/8844325
Deniss Cubas-Alarcón, Génesis Masiel Guevara-Vásquez, Danny Omar Suclupe-Campos, Salvadora Castro-Martínez, Franklin Rómulo Aguilar-Gamboa, Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas
Introduction: Transplacental infections are frequent, especially in developing countries, where limited screening is performed to find infectious agents in the pregnant population. We aim to determine the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and seroinfection of antibodies against Toxoplasma, parvovirus B19, T. pallidum, and HIV in pregnant women who attended the Motupe Health Center in Lambayeque, Peru during July-August 2018.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 179 pregnant women interviewed with a standardized questionnaire. ELISA was used to determine antibodies to Toxoplasma and parvovirus B19. The detection of syphilis and HIV was conducted using immunochromatography, while the detection of hepatitis B was conducted using FTA-ABS and immunofluorescence, respectively.
Results: Of 179 pregnant women, syphilis and HIV infections routinely included in the screening of pregnant women presented a seroinfection of 2.2 and 0.6%, respectively. Toxoplasmosis seroinfection was 25.1%, while IgM antiparvovirus B19 was 40.8%, revealing that pregnant women had an active infection at the time of study.
Conclusion: The level of seroinfection of toxoplasmosis reveals the risk to which pregnant women who participated in the study are exposed. The high seroinfection of parvovirus B19 could explain the cases of spontaneous abortion and levels of anemia in newborn that have been reported in Motupe, Lambayeque, Peru. However, future causality studies are necessary to determine the significance of these findings.
{"title":"Seroinfection of Antibodies to <i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>, Parvovirus B19, <i>Treponema pallidum</i>, and HIV in a Pregnant Attending a Medical Center in Northern Peru.","authors":"Deniss Cubas-Alarcón, Génesis Masiel Guevara-Vásquez, Danny Omar Suclupe-Campos, Salvadora Castro-Martínez, Franklin Rómulo Aguilar-Gamboa, Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas","doi":"10.1155/2024/8844325","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2024/8844325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transplacental infections are frequent, especially in developing countries, where limited screening is performed to find infectious agents in the pregnant population. We aim to determine the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and seroinfection of antibodies against <i>Toxoplasma</i>, parvovirus B19, <i>T. pallidum</i>, and HIV in pregnant women who attended the Motupe Health Center in Lambayeque, Peru during July-August 2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 179 pregnant women interviewed with a standardized questionnaire. ELISA was used to determine antibodies to <i>Toxoplasma</i> and parvovirus B19. The detection of syphilis and HIV was conducted using immunochromatography, while the detection of hepatitis B was conducted using FTA-ABS and immunofluorescence, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 179 pregnant women, syphilis and HIV infections routinely included in the screening of pregnant women presented a seroinfection of 2.2 and 0.6%, respectively. Toxoplasmosis seroinfection was 25.1%, while IgM antiparvovirus B19 was 40.8%, revealing that pregnant women had an active infection at the time of study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of seroinfection of toxoplasmosis reveals the risk to which pregnant women who participated in the study are exposed. The high seroinfection of parvovirus B19 could explain the cases of spontaneous abortion and levels of anemia in newborn that have been reported in Motupe, Lambayeque, Peru. However, future causality studies are necessary to determine the significance of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8844325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141330866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara Shayanfar, S. Bahadory, Ali Taghipour, M. Foroutan, Amir Abdoli
Background. Toxocariasis is an important health problem caused by the parasitic species Toxocara canis (T. canis) and Toxocara cati (T. cati). Prevalence of toxocariasis in pregnant women as a vulnerable population is doubly important, and the aim of this study is to estimate the overall prevalence of toxocariasis infection in pregnant women according to the available reports. Methods. The present study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklists. A systematic search was carried out in international scientific databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and PubMed) between 1990 and 2023. The overall prevalence of parasitic infection was estimated with a random-effects model. All analyses (overall prevalence, heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis) were performed with comprehensive meta-analysis (V2.2, Bio stat) software. Results. Amid the final eleven included studies, based on the random-effects model, the estimation of the pooled prevalence of Toxocara spp. was 20.8% (95% CI, 9.8–38.7%). The association between the risk factors of toxocariasis and the prevalence of the disease was not statistically significant. Conclusions. In the present study, significant prevalence was reported; however, considering the limited number of studies, it seems that the actual prevalence of the disease is higher. Therefore, it seems necessary to monitor this health problem in pregnant women.
{"title":"Seroprevalence of Toxocara spp. in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sara Shayanfar, S. Bahadory, Ali Taghipour, M. Foroutan, Amir Abdoli","doi":"10.1155/2024/1943353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1943353","url":null,"abstract":"Background. Toxocariasis is an important health problem caused by the parasitic species Toxocara canis (T. canis) and Toxocara cati (T. cati). Prevalence of toxocariasis in pregnant women as a vulnerable population is doubly important, and the aim of this study is to estimate the overall prevalence of toxocariasis infection in pregnant women according to the available reports. Methods. The present study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklists. A systematic search was carried out in international scientific databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and PubMed) between 1990 and 2023. The overall prevalence of parasitic infection was estimated with a random-effects model. All analyses (overall prevalence, heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis) were performed with comprehensive meta-analysis (V2.2, Bio stat) software. Results. Amid the final eleven included studies, based on the random-effects model, the estimation of the pooled prevalence of Toxocara spp. was 20.8% (95% CI, 9.8–38.7%). The association between the risk factors of toxocariasis and the prevalence of the disease was not statistically significant. Conclusions. In the present study, significant prevalence was reported; however, considering the limited number of studies, it seems that the actual prevalence of the disease is higher. Therefore, it seems necessary to monitor this health problem in pregnant women.","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"117 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140680480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alisa Kachikis, Melissa A. Schiff, Kathryn Moore, Theresa Chapple-McGruder, Jessica Arluck, Jane Hitti
Background. Congenital syphilis (CS) is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. The study objectives were to compare risk factors among women with syphilis infection whose pregnancies did and did not result in CS cases and to evaluate other geographic and socioeconomic characteristics of county of residence as a measure of healthcare inequity. Methods. This study linked maternal and congenital syphilis data from the Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH), 2008-2015. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline was followed. Demographic, behavioral, and case characteristics were compared among women with syphilis infection who did and did not have an infant with CS. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and multivariate regression analyses were performed using STATA 14.2 (College Station, TX). Results. Of 505 women with syphilis infection, 23% had an infant with CS, while 77% did not. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, factors associated with CS outcome were age greater than 35 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-14.89), hospital/emergency department diagnosis of syphilis (aOR 3.43; 95% CI 1.54-7.62), and high-risk behaviors such as exchanging sex for money or drugs (aOR 3.25; 95% CI 1.18-8.98). There were no associations between characteristics of county of residence and CS outcome. Conclusions. This study highlights risk factors that may be associated with CS incidence and the adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with CS. Further work is needed to study improved data collection systems, contributing factors related to CS as well as prevention measures in the United States.
背景。先天性梅毒(CS)与显著的围产期发病率和死亡率相关。研究的目的是比较梅毒感染妇女怀孕和未怀孕导致CS病例的危险因素,并评估居住县的其他地理和社会经济特征,作为医疗保健不平等的衡量标准。方法。这项研究将2008-2015年乔治亚州公共卫生部(DPH)的孕产妇和先天性梅毒数据联系起来。遵循《加强流行病学观察性研究报告》(STROBE)报告指南。人口统计学、行为和病例特征在梅毒感染妇女中进行比较,这些妇女有和没有患有CS的婴儿。使用STATA 14.2 (College Station, TX)进行卡方、Fisher精确和多元回归分析。结果。在505名感染梅毒的妇女中,23%的婴儿患有CS,而77%的婴儿没有。在对种族/民族进行调整后,与CS结果相关的因素是年龄大于35岁(调整优势比(aOR) 3.88;95%可信区间(CI) 1.01-14.89),医院/急诊科梅毒诊断(aOR 3.43;95% CI 1.54-7.62),以及高危行为,如以性换取金钱或毒品(aOR 3.25;95% ci 1.18-8.98)。居住县的特征与CS结果之间没有关联。结论。本研究强调了可能与CS发病率相关的危险因素以及与CS相关的不良妊娠结局。需要进一步研究改进的数据收集系统、与CS相关的因素以及美国的预防措施。
{"title":"Risk Factors Associated with Congenital Syphilis, Georgia, 2008-2015","authors":"Alisa Kachikis, Melissa A. Schiff, Kathryn Moore, Theresa Chapple-McGruder, Jessica Arluck, Jane Hitti","doi":"10.1155/2023/3958406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3958406","url":null,"abstract":"Background. Congenital syphilis (CS) is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. The study objectives were to compare risk factors among women with syphilis infection whose pregnancies did and did not result in CS cases and to evaluate other geographic and socioeconomic characteristics of county of residence as a measure of healthcare inequity. Methods. This study linked maternal and congenital syphilis data from the Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH), 2008-2015. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline was followed. Demographic, behavioral, and case characteristics were compared among women with syphilis infection who did and did not have an infant with CS. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and multivariate regression analyses were performed using STATA 14.2 (College Station, TX). Results. Of 505 women with syphilis infection, 23% had an infant with CS, while 77% did not. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, factors associated with CS outcome were age greater than 35 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-14.89), hospital/emergency department diagnosis of syphilis (aOR 3.43; 95% CI 1.54-7.62), and high-risk behaviors such as exchanging sex for money or drugs (aOR 3.25; 95% CI 1.18-8.98). There were no associations between characteristics of county of residence and CS outcome. Conclusions. This study highlights risk factors that may be associated with CS incidence and the adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with CS. Further work is needed to study improved data collection systems, contributing factors related to CS as well as prevention measures in the United States.","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"20 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135340557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-28eCollection Date: 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2023/6612268
Amr H Masaadeh, Patrick C Mathias, Bradley A Ford, Dustin E Bosch
Background: Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP), is a leading indication for hospitalization in the first trimester. NVP and HG are associated with Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection in non-United States cohorts. How HP exposure and NVP interact to affect metabolic disturbance and pregnancy outcomes is not known.
Materials and methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study relating HP and NVP to serum electrolyte laboratory results, preterm delivery, and infant birth weight. Single academic institution discovery and independent multi-institutional validation cohorts included pregnant subjects with an HP test result. Associations of HP, NVP, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed with odds ratio calculations, Student's t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Among subjects with positive HP test results, the prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) was 0.025 (66 of 2671) and NVP was 0.27 (710 of 2671). Subjects with negative HP had prevalence of HG 0.015 (165 of 10,960) and NVP 0.22 (2392 of 10,960). History of HP exposure increased risk of NVP, including HG (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). Patients with HP exposure had lower serum potassium (mean difference 0.1 mEq/L) and bicarbonate (mean difference 0.3 mEq/L) during pregnancy than HP-negative patients (p < 0.01). Serum potassium was lowest in subjects with both NVP and HP exposure (mean 3.5 mEq/L [3.4-3.6], p < 0.0001). HP exposure alone carried increased risk for preterm delivery (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.4]). NVP alone increased risk of preterm delivery (OR 2.8 [2.5-3.1]) including second trimester delivery (OR 2.2 [1.7-2.8]). In multivariate analysis, HP exposure in the setting of NVP further increased risk of preterm delivery (adjusted OR 1.4 [1.0-1.9], p = 0.03).
Conclusions: H. pylori exposure and diagnosis of NVP are individually associated with metabolic disturbances and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm labor and delivery, and their combination further increases risk in US populations.
{"title":"<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Exposure in Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy Increases Risk of Preterm Delivery.","authors":"Amr H Masaadeh, Patrick C Mathias, Bradley A Ford, Dustin E Bosch","doi":"10.1155/2023/6612268","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/6612268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP), is a leading indication for hospitalization in the first trimester. NVP and HG are associated with <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (HP) infection in non-United States cohorts. How HP exposure and NVP interact to affect metabolic disturbance and pregnancy outcomes is not known.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We designed a retrospective cohort study relating HP and NVP to serum electrolyte laboratory results, preterm delivery, and infant birth weight. Single academic institution discovery and independent multi-institutional validation cohorts included pregnant subjects with an HP test result. Associations of HP, NVP, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed with odds ratio calculations, Student's <i>t</i>-tests, and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among subjects with positive HP test results, the prevalence of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) was 0.025 (66 of 2671) and NVP was 0.27 (710 of 2671). Subjects with negative HP had prevalence of HG 0.015 (165 of 10,960) and NVP 0.22 (2392 of 10,960). History of HP exposure increased risk of NVP, including HG (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). Patients with HP exposure had lower serum potassium (mean difference 0.1 mEq/L) and bicarbonate (mean difference 0.3 mEq/L) during pregnancy than HP-negative patients (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Serum potassium was lowest in subjects with both NVP and HP exposure (mean 3.5 mEq/L [3.4-3.6], <i>p</i> < 0.0001). HP exposure alone carried increased risk for preterm delivery (OR 1.3 [1.1-1.4]). NVP alone increased risk of preterm delivery (OR 2.8 [2.5-3.1]) including second trimester delivery (OR 2.2 [1.7-2.8]). In multivariate analysis, HP exposure in the setting of NVP further increased risk of preterm delivery (adjusted OR 1.4 [1.0-1.9], <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><i>H. pylori</i> exposure and diagnosis of NVP are individually associated with metabolic disturbances and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm labor and delivery, and their combination further increases risk in US populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"6612268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10555503/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-22eCollection Date: 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1155/2023/4563797
Pamela El Hayek, Myriam Boueri, Leah Nasr, Christine Aoun, Edouard Sayad, Karl Jallad
Introduction: Discuss the impact of cholera infection on pregnant women, fetus, and neonates and review the safety of cholera vaccines in pregnancy.
Methods: This study was carried out as a narrative review during November 2022. A thorough literature review was conducted on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. The following parameters were assessed from the included studies: type of cholera vaccine, cholera symptoms, cholera treatment, effect of cholera on pregnancy, effect of cholera treatment on pregnancy, effect of cholera vaccine on pregnancy, risk factors for fetuses and neonates, and prevention of cholera. The authors independently extracted data from the 24 included studies.
Results: Cholera infection is a serious threat on pregnancy as it could lead to increased stillbirths and neonatal death. Fetal death was shown to occur mainly in the third trimester as most of the pregnant women infected with cholera had spontaneous abortions even after controlling for other confounding variables such as maternal age, dehydration level, and vomiting. Neonatal death was attributed mainly to congenital malformations and low Apgar scores with no improvements. Besides, cholera vaccines have shown to be safe in pregnancy and have proven to lower fetal and neonatal malformations among vaccinated compared to nonvaccinated pregnant women.
Conclusion: This narrative summarizes the different complications due to cholera infection in pregnancy. It also reviews the safety of cholera vaccine administration in pregnant women.
{"title":"Cholera Infection Risks and Cholera Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy.","authors":"Pamela El Hayek, Myriam Boueri, Leah Nasr, Christine Aoun, Edouard Sayad, Karl Jallad","doi":"10.1155/2023/4563797","DOIUrl":"10.1155/2023/4563797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discuss the impact of cholera infection on pregnant women, fetus, and neonates and review the safety of cholera vaccines in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was carried out as a narrative review during November 2022. A thorough literature review was conducted on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. The following parameters were assessed from the included studies: type of cholera vaccine, cholera symptoms, cholera treatment, effect of cholera on pregnancy, effect of cholera treatment on pregnancy, effect of cholera vaccine on pregnancy, risk factors for fetuses and neonates, and prevention of cholera. The authors independently extracted data from the 24 included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cholera infection is a serious threat on pregnancy as it could lead to increased stillbirths and neonatal death. Fetal death was shown to occur mainly in the third trimester as most of the pregnant women infected with cholera had spontaneous abortions even after controlling for other confounding variables such as maternal age, dehydration level, and vomiting. Neonatal death was attributed mainly to congenital malformations and low Apgar scores with no improvements. Besides, cholera vaccines have shown to be safe in pregnancy and have proven to lower fetal and neonatal malformations among vaccinated compared to nonvaccinated pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This narrative summarizes the different complications due to cholera infection in pregnancy. It also reviews the safety of cholera vaccine administration in pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"4563797"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228220/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9576971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Proper antenatal care is one of great means of reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortality. However, determining level of knowledge and practice is vital, and the objective of this study was to evaluate this gap among pregnant women in Amatere Health Center, Massawa city, Eritrea, 2019.
Methods: A cross-sectional study with systematic sampling was conducted. All pregnant mothers who were resident of Massawa city and visiting Amatere Health Center for their current pregnancy were included in the study. An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used as data collection tool. Results were presented using descriptive statistics, percent, and frequencies.
Results: A total of 289 pregnant mothers were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 27.7 years. Most mothers reported that high blood pressure (92.4%), maternal smoking (97.6%), alcohol consumption (97.2%), infection (92.7%), and medicines (98.3%) had affected fetal growth during pregnancy. Practically, two-thirds (59.4%) of the mothers were visiting the health facility during the first three months of their pregnancy. Majority of mothers had good knowledge (84.1%) and attitude (99%), but they had low level of practice (45%). Marital status, occupation, gravidity, and parity had showed statistically significant association to their comprehensive knowledge (p < 0.001). And their gravidity (p < 0.003) and parity (p < 0.001) had also showed statistically significant association to their level of practice.
Conclusion: Even though majority of the pregnant mothers had high level of knowledge and attitude, their practice towards ANC was relatively low. Age, marital status, and occupation showed statistically significant association to their comprehensive knowledge. Moreover, multiparous and multigravida mothers were having higher level of knowledge and practice on antenatal care. Enhancing community awareness on early starting of antenatal care and improving their practice through proper counseling are highly recommended.
{"title":"Level of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pregnant Women on Antenatal Care in Amatere Health Center, Massawa, Eritrea: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2019.","authors":"Hailemichael Gebremariam, Berhe Tesfai, Seltene Tewelde, Yonas Kiflemariam, Fitsum Kibreab","doi":"10.1155/2023/1912187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1912187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper antenatal care is one of great means of reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortality. However, determining level of knowledge and practice is vital, and the objective of this study was to evaluate this gap among pregnant women in Amatere Health Center, Massawa city, Eritrea, 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study with systematic sampling was conducted. All pregnant mothers who were resident of Massawa city and visiting Amatere Health Center for their current pregnancy were included in the study. An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used as data collection tool. Results were presented using descriptive statistics, percent, and frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 289 pregnant mothers were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 27.7 years. Most mothers reported that high blood pressure (92.4%), maternal smoking (97.6%), alcohol consumption (97.2%), infection (92.7%), and medicines (98.3%) had affected fetal growth during pregnancy. Practically, two-thirds (59.4%) of the mothers were visiting the health facility during the first three months of their pregnancy. Majority of mothers had good knowledge (84.1%) and attitude (99%), but they had low level of practice (45%). Marital status, occupation, gravidity, and parity had showed statistically significant association to their comprehensive knowledge (<i>p</i> < 0.001). And their gravidity (<i>p</i> < 0.003) and parity (<i>p</i> < 0.001) had also showed statistically significant association to their level of practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though majority of the pregnant mothers had high level of knowledge and attitude, their practice towards ANC was relatively low. Age, marital status, and occupation showed statistically significant association to their comprehensive knowledge. Moreover, multiparous and multigravida mothers were having higher level of knowledge and practice on antenatal care. Enhancing community awareness on early starting of antenatal care and improving their practice through proper counseling are highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1912187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9889139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10742999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Scientific evidence suggests an increased risk of maternal and obstetric complications in pregnant patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study is aimed at evaluating perinatal and maternal outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a university hospital setting. This was a prospective cohort study of 177 pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at a tertiary hospital between May 2020 and November 2021. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic women with a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test result at any time during pregnancy were included in this study. For the purpose of this study, we classified COVID-19 cases into two groups: mild and severe cases. The two groups were then compared to predict how the clinical presentation of COVID-19 affected adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Gestational age ≥ 20 weeks at the time of infection was significantly associated with the occurrence of severe forms of the disease (relative risk (RR) 3.98, p = 0.01). Cesarean section was the preferred mode of delivery, with 95 women (62.1%) undergoing surgery. A total of 149 neonates were delivered to women who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during the course of pregnancy of which thirty-five (23.5%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Severe forms of COVID-19 increased the risk of premature delivery (RR 6.69, p < 0.001), emergency cesarean delivery (RR 9.4, p < 0.001), intensive care hospitalization (RR 51, p < 0.001), and maternal death (RR 12.3, p = 0.02). However, severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection are not directly responsible for low birth weight or the need for neonatal resuscitation. Our findings suggest that pregnant women presenting with severe COVID-19 disease are at an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, such as premature delivery, cesarean section, admission to the ICU, and maternal death. Infection after the 20th week of gestation increases the risk of developing severe forms of the disease.
科学证据表明,感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)的孕妇出现孕产妇和产科并发症的风险增加。本研究旨在评估大学医院2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的围产期和孕产妇结局。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是2020年5月至2021年11月在一家三级医院确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染的177名孕妇。在妊娠期间任何时间逆转录聚合酶链反应试验阳性的有症状和无症状妇女均被纳入本研究。在本研究中,我们将COVID-19病例分为轻度和重度两组。然后对两组进行比较,以预测COVID-19的临床表现如何影响孕产妇和围产期的不良结局。感染时胎龄≥20周与严重形式疾病的发生显著相关(相对危险度(RR) 3.98, p = 0.01)。剖宫产是首选的分娩方式,有95例(62.1%)接受了手术。共有149名新生儿分娩给妊娠期间任何时间确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染的妇女,其中35名(23.5%)入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。严重形式的COVID-19增加了早产(RR 6.69, p < 0.001)、紧急剖宫产(RR 9.4, p < 0.001)、重症监护住院(RR 51, p < 0.001)和孕产妇死亡(RR 12.3, p = 0.02)的风险。然而,严重形式的SARS-CoV-2感染并不是导致低出生体重或需要新生儿复苏的直接原因。我们的研究结果表明,患有严重COVID-19疾病的孕妇发生不良孕产妇和围产期结局(如早产、剖宫产、入住ICU和孕产妇死亡)的风险增加。妊娠20周后的感染增加了发展成严重形式的疾病的风险。
{"title":"Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Data from a University Hospital Setting in Tirana, Albania, May 2020 to November 2021.","authors":"Enkeleda Prifti, Najada Como, Enxhi Vrapi, Alketa Hoxha Qosja, Evelina Kreko, Nevila Kryemadhi, Elizana Petrela, Irsida Mehmeti, Genci Hyska","doi":"10.1155/2023/4032010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4032010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific evidence suggests an increased risk of maternal and obstetric complications in pregnant patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study is aimed at evaluating perinatal and maternal outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a university hospital setting. This was a prospective cohort study of 177 pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at a tertiary hospital between May 2020 and November 2021. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic women with a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test result at any time during pregnancy were included in this study. For the purpose of this study, we classified COVID-19 cases into two groups: mild and severe cases. The two groups were then compared to predict how the clinical presentation of COVID-19 affected adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Gestational age ≥ 20 weeks at the time of infection was significantly associated with the occurrence of severe forms of the disease (relative risk (RR) 3.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Cesarean section was the preferred mode of delivery, with 95 women (62.1%) undergoing surgery. A total of 149 neonates were delivered to women who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during the course of pregnancy of which thirty-five (23.5%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Severe forms of COVID-19 increased the risk of premature delivery (RR 6.69, <i>p</i> < 0.001), emergency cesarean delivery (RR 9.4, <i>p</i> < 0.001), intensive care hospitalization (RR 51, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and maternal death (RR 12.3, <i>p</i> = 0.02). However, severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection are not directly responsible for low birth weight or the need for neonatal resuscitation. Our findings suggest that pregnant women presenting with severe COVID-19 disease are at an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, such as premature delivery, cesarean section, admission to the ICU, and maternal death. Infection after the 20<sup>th</sup> week of gestation increases the risk of developing severe forms of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":13546,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"4032010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284651/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9716132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}