Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9
Gabriele Maria Leanza, Emanuele Rando, Federico Frondizi, Eleonora Taddei, Francesca Giovannenze, Juan P Horcajada, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Carlo Torti
Introduction: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.
Methods: We searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.
Results: Nine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed.
{"title":"A systematic review of dalbavancin efficacy as a sequential therapy for infective endocarditis.","authors":"Gabriele Maria Leanza, Emanuele Rando, Federico Frondizi, Eleonora Taddei, Francesca Giovannenze, Juan P Horcajada, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Carlo Torti","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02393-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023430032.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142345973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-08DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02380-0
Florens Lohrmann, Androulla Efstratiou, Uffe B Skov Sørensen, Roberta Creti, Antoaneta Decheva, Pavla Křížová, Jana Kozáková, Javier Rodriguez-Granger, Manuel De La Rosa Fraile, Immaculada Margarit, Daniela Rinaudo, Domenico Maione, John Telford, Graziella Orefici, Mogens Kilian, Baharak Afshar, Pierrette Melin, Reinhard Berner, Markus Hufnagel, Mirjam Kunze
Introduction: Despite national guidelines and use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci (GBS)) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns in Europe and the United States. The European DEVANI (Design of a Vaccine Against Neonatal Infections) program assessed the neonatal GBS infection burden in Europe, the clinical characteristics of colonized women and microbiological data of GBS strains in colonized women and their infants with early-onset disease (EOD).
Methods: Overall, 1083 pregnant women with a GBS-positive culture result from eight European countries were included in the study. Clinical obstetrical information was collected by a standardized questionnaire. GBS strains were characterized by serological and molecular methods.
Results: Among GBS carriers included in this study after testing positive for GBS by vaginal or recto-vaginal sampling, 13.4% had at least one additional obstetrical risk factor for EOD. The five most common capsular types (i.e., Ia, Ib, II, III and V) comprised ~ 93% of GBS carried. Of the colonized women, 77.8% received any IAP, and in 49.5% the IAP was considered appropriate. In our cohort, nine neonates presented with GBS early-onset disease (EOD) with significant regional heterogeneity.
Conclusions: Screening methods and IAP rates need to be harmonized across Europe in order to reduce the rates of EOD. The epidemiological data from eight different European countries provides important information for the development of a successful GBS vaccine.
{"title":"Maternal Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in Europe: data from the multi-center DEVANI study.","authors":"Florens Lohrmann, Androulla Efstratiou, Uffe B Skov Sørensen, Roberta Creti, Antoaneta Decheva, Pavla Křížová, Jana Kozáková, Javier Rodriguez-Granger, Manuel De La Rosa Fraile, Immaculada Margarit, Daniela Rinaudo, Domenico Maione, John Telford, Graziella Orefici, Mogens Kilian, Baharak Afshar, Pierrette Melin, Reinhard Berner, Markus Hufnagel, Mirjam Kunze","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02380-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02380-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite national guidelines and use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci (GBS)) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns in Europe and the United States. The European DEVANI (Design of a Vaccine Against Neonatal Infections) program assessed the neonatal GBS infection burden in Europe, the clinical characteristics of colonized women and microbiological data of GBS strains in colonized women and their infants with early-onset disease (EOD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 1083 pregnant women with a GBS-positive culture result from eight European countries were included in the study. Clinical obstetrical information was collected by a standardized questionnaire. GBS strains were characterized by serological and molecular methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among GBS carriers included in this study after testing positive for GBS by vaginal or recto-vaginal sampling, 13.4% had at least one additional obstetrical risk factor for EOD. The five most common capsular types (i.e., Ia, Ib, II, III and V) comprised ~ 93% of GBS carried. Of the colonized women, 77.8% received any IAP, and in 49.5% the IAP was considered appropriate. In our cohort, nine neonates presented with GBS early-onset disease (EOD) with significant regional heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening methods and IAP rates need to be harmonized across Europe in order to reduce the rates of EOD. The epidemiological data from eight different European countries provides important information for the development of a successful GBS vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"373-381"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-08DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02355-1
Zachary Aldewereld, Brendan Connolly, Russell K Banks, Ron Reeder, Richard Holubkov, Robert A Berg, David Wessel, Murray M Pollack, Kathleen Meert, Mark Hall, Christopher Newth, John C Lin, Allan Doctor, Tim Cornell, Rick E Harrison, Athena F Zuppa, J Michael Dean, Joseph A Carcillo
Purpose: Sepsis causes significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. Inability to clear an infection and secondary infections are known complications in severe sepsis and likely result in worsened outcomes. We sought to characterize risk factors of these complications.
Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of clinical data from 401 subjects enrolled in the PHENOtyping sepsis-induced Multiple organ failure Study. We examined factors associated with prolonged infection, defined as infection that continued to be identified 7 days or more from initial identification, and secondary infection, defined as new infections identified ≥ 3 days from presentation. Multivariable adjustment was performed to examine laboratory markers of immune depression, with immunocompromised and immunocompetent subjects analyzed separately.
Results: Illness severity, immunocompromised status, invasive procedures, and site of infection were associated with secondary infection and/or prolonged infection. Persistent lymphopenia, defined as an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 1000 cells/µL twice in the first five days, and persistent neutropenia, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1000 cells/µL twice in the first five days, were associated with secondary and prolonged infections. When adjusted in multivariable analysis, persistent lymphopenia remained associated with secondary infection in both immunocompromised (aOR = 14.19, 95% CI [2.69, 262.22] and immunocompetent subjects (aOR = 2.09, 95% CI [1.03, 4.17]). Persistent neutropenia was independently associated with secondary infection in immunocompromised subjects (aOR = 5.34, 95% CI [1.92, 15.84]). Secondary and prolonged infections were associated with worse outcomes, including death.
Conclusions: Laboratory markers of immune suppression can be used to predict secondary infection. Lymphopenia is an independent risk factor in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients for secondary infection.
{"title":"Risk factors for prolonged infection and secondary infection in pediatric severe sepsis.","authors":"Zachary Aldewereld, Brendan Connolly, Russell K Banks, Ron Reeder, Richard Holubkov, Robert A Berg, David Wessel, Murray M Pollack, Kathleen Meert, Mark Hall, Christopher Newth, John C Lin, Allan Doctor, Tim Cornell, Rick E Harrison, Athena F Zuppa, J Michael Dean, Joseph A Carcillo","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02355-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02355-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sepsis causes significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. Inability to clear an infection and secondary infections are known complications in severe sepsis and likely result in worsened outcomes. We sought to characterize risk factors of these complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of clinical data from 401 subjects enrolled in the PHENOtyping sepsis-induced Multiple organ failure Study. We examined factors associated with prolonged infection, defined as infection that continued to be identified 7 days or more from initial identification, and secondary infection, defined as new infections identified ≥ 3 days from presentation. Multivariable adjustment was performed to examine laboratory markers of immune depression, with immunocompromised and immunocompetent subjects analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Illness severity, immunocompromised status, invasive procedures, and site of infection were associated with secondary infection and/or prolonged infection. Persistent lymphopenia, defined as an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) < 1000 cells/µL twice in the first five days, and persistent neutropenia, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1000 cells/µL twice in the first five days, were associated with secondary and prolonged infections. When adjusted in multivariable analysis, persistent lymphopenia remained associated with secondary infection in both immunocompromised (aOR = 14.19, 95% CI [2.69, 262.22] and immunocompetent subjects (aOR = 2.09, 95% CI [1.03, 4.17]). Persistent neutropenia was independently associated with secondary infection in immunocompromised subjects (aOR = 5.34, 95% CI [1.92, 15.84]). Secondary and prolonged infections were associated with worse outcomes, including death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laboratory markers of immune suppression can be used to predict secondary infection. Lymphopenia is an independent risk factor in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients for secondary infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"241-251"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141906521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02325-7
Andrea Witowski, Lars Palmowski, Tim Rahmel, Hartmuth Nowak, Stefan F Ehrentraut, Christian Putensen, Thilo von Groote, Alexander Zarbock, Nina Babel, Moritz Anft, Barbara Sitek, Thilo Bracht, Malte Bayer, Maike Weber, Christina Weisheit, Stephanie Pfänder, Martin Eisenacher, Michael Adamzik, Rump Katharina, Björn Koos, Dominik Ziehe
Purpose: There is evidence that lower activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network is associated with positive outcomes in mild and moderate courses of COVID-19. The effect of this cascade in COVID-19 sepsis is still undetermined. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network in COVID-19-induced sepsis is associated with an impact on 30-day survival.
Methods: We used biomaterial from 81 prospectively recruited patients from the multicentric CovidDataNet.NRW-study cohort (German clinical trial registry: DRKS00026184) with their collected medical history, vital signs, laboratory parameters, microbiological findings and patient outcome. ERK activity was measured by evaluating ERK phosphorylation using a Proximity Ligation Assay.
Results: An increased ERK activity at 4 days after diagnosis of COVID-19-induced sepsis was associated with a more than threefold increased chance of survival in an adjusted Cox regression model. ERK activity was independent of other confounders such as Charlson Comorbidity Index or SOFA score (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.84, p = 0.02).
Conclusion: High activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network during the course of COVID-19 sepsis is a protective factor and may indicate recovery of the immune system. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
{"title":"Activation of the MAPK network provides a survival advantage during the course of COVID-19-induced sepsis: a real-world evidence analysis of a multicenter COVID-19 Sepsis Cohort.","authors":"Andrea Witowski, Lars Palmowski, Tim Rahmel, Hartmuth Nowak, Stefan F Ehrentraut, Christian Putensen, Thilo von Groote, Alexander Zarbock, Nina Babel, Moritz Anft, Barbara Sitek, Thilo Bracht, Malte Bayer, Maike Weber, Christina Weisheit, Stephanie Pfänder, Martin Eisenacher, Michael Adamzik, Rump Katharina, Björn Koos, Dominik Ziehe","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02325-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02325-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is evidence that lower activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network is associated with positive outcomes in mild and moderate courses of COVID-19. The effect of this cascade in COVID-19 sepsis is still undetermined. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network in COVID-19-induced sepsis is associated with an impact on 30-day survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used biomaterial from 81 prospectively recruited patients from the multicentric CovidDataNet.NRW-study cohort (German clinical trial registry: DRKS00026184) with their collected medical history, vital signs, laboratory parameters, microbiological findings and patient outcome. ERK activity was measured by evaluating ERK phosphorylation using a Proximity Ligation Assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increased ERK activity at 4 days after diagnosis of COVID-19-induced sepsis was associated with a more than threefold increased chance of survival in an adjusted Cox regression model. ERK activity was independent of other confounders such as Charlson Comorbidity Index or SOFA score (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.84, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High activity of the RAF/MEK/ERK network during the course of COVID-19 sepsis is a protective factor and may indicate recovery of the immune system. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"107-115"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141418799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-07-11DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02342-6
Roberto Casale, Matteo Boattini, Sara Comini, Paulo Bastos, Silvia Corcione, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Gabriele Bianco, Cristina Costa
Introduction: Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii complex are pathogens of interest due to their ability to cause health-care associated infections and display complex drug resistance phenotypes. However, their clinical and microbiological landscape is still poorly characterized.
Methods: Observational retrospective study including all hospitalized patients presenting with a positive positive blood culture (BC) episode caused by less common NFGNB over a four-year period (January 2020-December 2023). Clinical-microbiological features and factors associated with mortality were investigated.
Results: Sixty-six less common NFGNB isolates other than Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species causing 63 positive BC episodes were recovered from 60 patients. Positive BC episodes were predominantly sustained by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (49.2%) followed by Achromobacter species (15.9%) that exhibited the most complex resistance phenotype. Positive BC episodes had bloodstream infection criteria in 95.2% of cases (60 out 63), being intravascular device (30.2%) and respiratory tract (19.1%) the main sources of infection. Fourteen-day, 30-day, and in-hospital mortality rates were 6.4%, 9.5%, and 15.9%, respectively. The longer time from admission to the positive BC episode, older age, diabetes, admission due to sepsis, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index were identified as the main predictors of in-hospital mortality.
Conclusions: Positive BC episodes sustained by NFGNB other than Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species were predominantly sustained by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter species, having bloodstream infection criteria in the vast majority of cases. Factors that have emerged to be associated with mortality highlighted how these species may have more room in prolonged hospitalisation and at the end of life for patients with chronic organ diseases.
{"title":"Clinical and microbiological features of positive blood culture episodes caused by non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli other than Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species (2020-2023).","authors":"Roberto Casale, Matteo Boattini, Sara Comini, Paulo Bastos, Silvia Corcione, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Gabriele Bianco, Cristina Costa","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02342-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02342-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii complex are pathogens of interest due to their ability to cause health-care associated infections and display complex drug resistance phenotypes. However, their clinical and microbiological landscape is still poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational retrospective study including all hospitalized patients presenting with a positive positive blood culture (BC) episode caused by less common NFGNB over a four-year period (January 2020-December 2023). Clinical-microbiological features and factors associated with mortality were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six less common NFGNB isolates other than Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species causing 63 positive BC episodes were recovered from 60 patients. Positive BC episodes were predominantly sustained by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (49.2%) followed by Achromobacter species (15.9%) that exhibited the most complex resistance phenotype. Positive BC episodes had bloodstream infection criteria in 95.2% of cases (60 out 63), being intravascular device (30.2%) and respiratory tract (19.1%) the main sources of infection. Fourteen-day, 30-day, and in-hospital mortality rates were 6.4%, 9.5%, and 15.9%, respectively. The longer time from admission to the positive BC episode, older age, diabetes, admission due to sepsis, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index were identified as the main predictors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive BC episodes sustained by NFGNB other than Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species were predominantly sustained by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter species, having bloodstream infection criteria in the vast majority of cases. Factors that have emerged to be associated with mortality highlighted how these species may have more room in prolonged hospitalisation and at the end of life for patients with chronic organ diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"183-196"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825528/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141579593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-07-20DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02351-5
Christina Bahrs, Christian Schönherr, Marcus Panning, Norman Rose, Theo Dähne, Stefan Hagel, Sebastian Weis, Jan Rupp, Gernot Rohde, Martin Witzenrath, Mathias W Pletz
Purpose: This study assessed the frequency, clinical significance, and risk factors for Herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation in immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Methods: The study included adult CAP-patients who were enrolled in the CAPNETZ study between 2007 and 2017 and had a residual sputum sample available for analysis. In addition to routine diagnostics, sputum and blood samples were tested for HSV-1/2 using PCR. Demographics, comorbidities, and CRB-65 score were compared between HSV-positive and negative patients using Fisher exact or Mann Whitney test. Logistic regression analyses investigated the influence of HSV reactivation on a modified hospital recovery scale (HRS) until day 7, divided into 3 categories (no oxygen therapy, oxygen therapy, ICU admission or death).
Results: Among 245 patients, HSV-1 and HSV-2 were detected in 30 patients (12.2%, 95%CI 8.7-16.9) and 0 patients, respectively. All HSV-positive patients were hospitalized, had a CRB-65 severity score of 0-2 and survived the first 28 day. In the HSV-positive group, patients had a non-significantly higher median age (70.5 versus 66 years) and a higher rate of oncological comorbidities (16.7% versus 8.8%) compared to the HSV-negative group. Distribution of co-pathogens and outcome parameters did not significantly differ between both groups. In a multivariate logistic regression model, age (AOR 1.029, p = 0.012) and CRB-65 score (AOR 1.709, p = 0.048), but not HSV-1 as single or co-pathogen were independently associated with higher HRS.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that HSV-1 reactivation is common in CAP but might not be associated with specific risk factors or a complicated disease course.
{"title":"Frequency and clinical significance of Herpes simplex virus type 1/2 reactivation in adult patients with mild to moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre cohort study.","authors":"Christina Bahrs, Christian Schönherr, Marcus Panning, Norman Rose, Theo Dähne, Stefan Hagel, Sebastian Weis, Jan Rupp, Gernot Rohde, Martin Witzenrath, Mathias W Pletz","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02351-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02351-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the frequency, clinical significance, and risk factors for Herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation in immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included adult CAP-patients who were enrolled in the CAPNETZ study between 2007 and 2017 and had a residual sputum sample available for analysis. In addition to routine diagnostics, sputum and blood samples were tested for HSV-1/2 using PCR. Demographics, comorbidities, and CRB-65 score were compared between HSV-positive and negative patients using Fisher exact or Mann Whitney test. Logistic regression analyses investigated the influence of HSV reactivation on a modified hospital recovery scale (HRS) until day 7, divided into 3 categories (no oxygen therapy, oxygen therapy, ICU admission or death).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 245 patients, HSV-1 and HSV-2 were detected in 30 patients (12.2%, 95%CI 8.7-16.9) and 0 patients, respectively. All HSV-positive patients were hospitalized, had a CRB-65 severity score of 0-2 and survived the first 28 day. In the HSV-positive group, patients had a non-significantly higher median age (70.5 versus 66 years) and a higher rate of oncological comorbidities (16.7% versus 8.8%) compared to the HSV-negative group. Distribution of co-pathogens and outcome parameters did not significantly differ between both groups. In a multivariate logistic regression model, age (AOR 1.029, p = 0.012) and CRB-65 score (AOR 1.709, p = 0.048), but not HSV-1 as single or co-pathogen were independently associated with higher HRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that HSV-1 reactivation is common in CAP but might not be associated with specific risk factors or a complicated disease course.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"449-455"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825638/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02323-9
Zachary A Yetmar, Ryan B Khodadadi, Supavit Chesdachai, Jack W McHugh, Josh Clement, Douglas W Challener, Nancy L Wengenack, Wendelyn Bosch, Maria Teresa Seville, Elena Beam
Background: Nocardia often causes pulmonary infection among those with chronic pulmonary disease or immunocompromising conditions. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended as first-line treatment, though little data exists regarding outcomes of different dosing regimens.
Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients with non-disseminated pulmonary nocardiosis initially treated with TMP-SMX monotherapy. Patients' initial TMP-SMX dosing was categorized as high- (> 10 mg/kg/day), intermediate- (5-10 mg/kg/day) or low-dose (< 5 mg/kg/day). Outcomes included one-year mortality, post-treatment recurrence, and dose adjustment or early discontinuation of TMP-SMX. SMX serum concentrations and their effect on management were also assessed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to Cox regression analyses.
Results: Ninety-one patients were included with 24 (26.4%), 37 (40.7%), and 30 (33.0%) treated with high-, intermediate-, and low-dose TMP-SMX, respectively. Patients who initially received low-dose (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.68) and intermediate-dose TMP-SMX (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-1.04) had lower risk of one-year mortality than the high-dose group. Risk of recurrence was similar between groups. Nineteen patients had peak SMX serum concentrations measured which resulted in 7 (36.8%) dose changes and was not associated with one-year mortality or recurrence. However, 66.7% of the high-dose group required TMP-SMX dose adjustment/discontinuation compared to 24.3% of the intermediate-dose and 26.7% of the low-dose groups (p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Low- and intermediate-dose TMP-SMX for non-disseminated pulmonary nocardiosis were not associated with poor outcomes compared to high-dose therapy, which had a higher rate of dose adjustment/early discontinuation. Historically used high-dose TMP-SMX may not be necessary for management of isolated pulmonary nocardiosis.
{"title":"Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole dosing and outcomes of pulmonary nocardiosis.","authors":"Zachary A Yetmar, Ryan B Khodadadi, Supavit Chesdachai, Jack W McHugh, Josh Clement, Douglas W Challener, Nancy L Wengenack, Wendelyn Bosch, Maria Teresa Seville, Elena Beam","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02323-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02323-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nocardia often causes pulmonary infection among those with chronic pulmonary disease or immunocompromising conditions. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is recommended as first-line treatment, though little data exists regarding outcomes of different dosing regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients with non-disseminated pulmonary nocardiosis initially treated with TMP-SMX monotherapy. Patients' initial TMP-SMX dosing was categorized as high- (> 10 mg/kg/day), intermediate- (5-10 mg/kg/day) or low-dose (< 5 mg/kg/day). Outcomes included one-year mortality, post-treatment recurrence, and dose adjustment or early discontinuation of TMP-SMX. SMX serum concentrations and their effect on management were also assessed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one patients were included with 24 (26.4%), 37 (40.7%), and 30 (33.0%) treated with high-, intermediate-, and low-dose TMP-SMX, respectively. Patients who initially received low-dose (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.68) and intermediate-dose TMP-SMX (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-1.04) had lower risk of one-year mortality than the high-dose group. Risk of recurrence was similar between groups. Nineteen patients had peak SMX serum concentrations measured which resulted in 7 (36.8%) dose changes and was not associated with one-year mortality or recurrence. However, 66.7% of the high-dose group required TMP-SMX dose adjustment/discontinuation compared to 24.3% of the intermediate-dose and 26.7% of the low-dose groups (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low- and intermediate-dose TMP-SMX for non-disseminated pulmonary nocardiosis were not associated with poor outcomes compared to high-dose therapy, which had a higher rate of dose adjustment/early discontinuation. Historically used high-dose TMP-SMX may not be necessary for management of isolated pulmonary nocardiosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141450409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02373-z
Natasja van de Pol, C Janneke van der Woude, Marijn Vis, Martijn B A van Doorn, Saskia L Schrauwen, Fatos Cetinözman-Teunissen, Rachel L West, Annemarie C de Vries
Background: Patients with Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs) using immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of infections, including vaccine-preventable infections. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether patients with IMIDs on systemic immunosuppressive therapy are vaccinated according to current guidelines.
Methods: A survey was sent out, between August 2022 and March 2023, to all patients with IMIDs that visited the departments of dermatology, rheumatology and gastroenterology at an academic and regional hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Patient-reported vaccination status was compared to the Dutch guidelines on vaccinations in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
Results: A total of 1,905/5,987 patients responded to the survey (response rate 32%). After exclusion of patients without systemic immunosuppressive medication, the study population comprised 1,390 patients, median age 56 years (IQR 42-66) and 41% male. Most patients (92%) had been vaccinated according to the Dutch National Immunization Program. Before starting immunosuppressive therapy, 2% of the patients who were still considered at risk according to the Dutch guideline were vaccinated for measles, and 4% for diphtheria/tetanus/polio (DT-IPV). Additionally, 62% of patients received an annual influenza vaccine, 16% received a five-yearly pneumococcal vaccine, and 91% were fully vaccinated against COVID-19.
Conclusion: Patients with IMIDs on immunosuppressive therapy are not vaccinated in accordance with the guidelines. Implementation strategies to improve the vaccination rates for patients with IMIDs should specifically focus on vaccinating against measles and diphtheria/tetanus/polio, and periodic vaccination against pneumococcal and influenza infections.
{"title":"Patients with immune mediated inflammatory diseases are insufficiently protected against vaccine-preventable infections.","authors":"Natasja van de Pol, C Janneke van der Woude, Marijn Vis, Martijn B A van Doorn, Saskia L Schrauwen, Fatos Cetinözman-Teunissen, Rachel L West, Annemarie C de Vries","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02373-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02373-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs) using immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk of infections, including vaccine-preventable infections. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether patients with IMIDs on systemic immunosuppressive therapy are vaccinated according to current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was sent out, between August 2022 and March 2023, to all patients with IMIDs that visited the departments of dermatology, rheumatology and gastroenterology at an academic and regional hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Patient-reported vaccination status was compared to the Dutch guidelines on vaccinations in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,905/5,987 patients responded to the survey (response rate 32%). After exclusion of patients without systemic immunosuppressive medication, the study population comprised 1,390 patients, median age 56 years (IQR 42-66) and 41% male. Most patients (92%) had been vaccinated according to the Dutch National Immunization Program. Before starting immunosuppressive therapy, 2% of the patients who were still considered at risk according to the Dutch guideline were vaccinated for measles, and 4% for diphtheria/tetanus/polio (DT-IPV). Additionally, 62% of patients received an annual influenza vaccine, 16% received a five-yearly pneumococcal vaccine, and 91% were fully vaccinated against COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with IMIDs on immunosuppressive therapy are not vaccinated in accordance with the guidelines. Implementation strategies to improve the vaccination rates for patients with IMIDs should specifically focus on vaccinating against measles and diphtheria/tetanus/polio, and periodic vaccination against pneumococcal and influenza infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"317-327"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825543/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02356-0
Sarah Hunter, Elsie Brown, Haemish Crawford, Cameron Grant
Purpose: It is unknown whether social distancing impacts frequency of presentation and severity of childhood bone and joint infection (BJI). In New Zealand, the COVID-19 disease elimination strategy involved strict social isolation policies spanning March 2020-September 2022. Examination of this period may provide insight around risk factors for BJI.
Methods: A retrospective review of all patients < 16 years with presumed acute haematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) or septic arthritis (SA) treated in the Auckland region was performed between 2018 and 2023. Frequency and severity of presentations has been examined before, during, and after periods of social restriction. Severe cases included those with intensive care admission, recurrent infection, or multiple surgeries. Pre-hospital experience, length of stay, and disease outcomes have also been assessed.
Results: A total of 563 cases met inclusion criteria. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, monthly case averages reduced between April 2020 to September 2022 (10.1 vs. 7.9 cases/month, p = 0.008). Separating cases by causative microbiology shows a statistically significant drop in culture negative and Kingella kingae mediated BJI cases (4.2 vs. 2.9 cases/month, p = 0.006) but not for cases secondary to Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes (4.2 vs. 3.9 cases/month, p = 0.6). The frequency of severe disease reduced during this period (5.6 vs. 4.1 cases/month, p = 0.01) together with lower rates of recurrent infection (9% vs. 4%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: The COVID-19 management strategy in New Zealand utilised strict social isolation, mask wearing, and hand hygiene measures to control disease spread between 2020 and 2022. These measures coincided with reduction in frequency and severity of presentations for childhood BJI.
{"title":"Epidemiology of childhood bone and joint disease during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand.","authors":"Sarah Hunter, Elsie Brown, Haemish Crawford, Cameron Grant","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02356-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02356-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is unknown whether social distancing impacts frequency of presentation and severity of childhood bone and joint infection (BJI). In New Zealand, the COVID-19 disease elimination strategy involved strict social isolation policies spanning March 2020-September 2022. Examination of this period may provide insight around risk factors for BJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients < 16 years with presumed acute haematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) or septic arthritis (SA) treated in the Auckland region was performed between 2018 and 2023. Frequency and severity of presentations has been examined before, during, and after periods of social restriction. Severe cases included those with intensive care admission, recurrent infection, or multiple surgeries. Pre-hospital experience, length of stay, and disease outcomes have also been assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 563 cases met inclusion criteria. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, monthly case averages reduced between April 2020 to September 2022 (10.1 vs. 7.9 cases/month, p = 0.008). Separating cases by causative microbiology shows a statistically significant drop in culture negative and Kingella kingae mediated BJI cases (4.2 vs. 2.9 cases/month, p = 0.006) but not for cases secondary to Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes (4.2 vs. 3.9 cases/month, p = 0.6). The frequency of severe disease reduced during this period (5.6 vs. 4.1 cases/month, p = 0.01) together with lower rates of recurrent infection (9% vs. 4%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 management strategy in New Zealand utilised strict social isolation, mask wearing, and hand hygiene measures to control disease spread between 2020 and 2022. These measures coincided with reduction in frequency and severity of presentations for childhood BJI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"253-258"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825630/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141878678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02374-y
Alicia Zink, Juliana Hofer, Christian Schneider, Franziska Kessler, Hannes Klenze, Dietrich Klauwer, Klaudia Maleki, Andreas Müller, Sarah Goretzki, Shubei Wang, Robin Kobbe, Andrea Vanegas Ramirez, Sebastian Bode, Ales Janda, Roland Fressle, Jonathan Remppis, Philipp Henneke, Siegbert Rieg, Anja Berger, Andreas Sing, Markus Hufnagel, Benedikt D Spielberger
Objectives: From September 2022 an increase in Corynebacterium diphtheriae (C. diphtheriae) infections was reported in Europe. Our study focuses on 31 adolescent and young adult refugees with cutaneous C. diphtheriae infections detected in Germany. We examined treatment regimens and outcomes to provide targeted insights into the management of this infection.
Methods: We distributed a standardized survey, focused on children and adolescents presenting to paediatric clinics through the German Paediatric Infectious Diseases Society (DGPI) and additional professional contacts in Germany. Data were extracted from routine medical documentation and reported anonymously.
Results: A total of 31 individuals with cutaneous C. diphtheriae infection were reported by 9 centres. Two of these showed diphtheria toxin (DT) related systemic symptoms and four exhibited systemic inflammation requiring complex management. The remaining 25 cases, with exclusively cutaneous manifestations, were afebrile. Treatment with topical antiseptics and systemic antibiotics, mainly aminopenicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) (35%) or clindamycin (25%), achieved eradication in all but two cases treated with aminopenicillin/BLI. Treatment duration varied between 5 and 17 days.
Conclusions: In refugees presenting with chronic skin wounds, C. diphtheriae should be included into the differential diagnosis. Fever seems to be a valuable marker to differentiate severe cases with potentially DT-mediated sequelae from exclusively cutaneous diphtheria (CD). For afebrile CD, topical antiseptics and oral antibiotic therapy with clindamycin for 7 days, followed by clinical surveillance appears to be a safe treatment regimen. Patients with CD who present with fever or pharyngitis should be thoroughly investigated including blood and pharyngeal swab cultures.
{"title":"Management and outcome of cutaneous diphtheria in adolescent refugees in Germany, June 2022 - October 2023.","authors":"Alicia Zink, Juliana Hofer, Christian Schneider, Franziska Kessler, Hannes Klenze, Dietrich Klauwer, Klaudia Maleki, Andreas Müller, Sarah Goretzki, Shubei Wang, Robin Kobbe, Andrea Vanegas Ramirez, Sebastian Bode, Ales Janda, Roland Fressle, Jonathan Remppis, Philipp Henneke, Siegbert Rieg, Anja Berger, Andreas Sing, Markus Hufnagel, Benedikt D Spielberger","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02374-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s15010-024-02374-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>From September 2022 an increase in Corynebacterium diphtheriae (C. diphtheriae) infections was reported in Europe. Our study focuses on 31 adolescent and young adult refugees with cutaneous C. diphtheriae infections detected in Germany. We examined treatment regimens and outcomes to provide targeted insights into the management of this infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a standardized survey, focused on children and adolescents presenting to paediatric clinics through the German Paediatric Infectious Diseases Society (DGPI) and additional professional contacts in Germany. Data were extracted from routine medical documentation and reported anonymously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 individuals with cutaneous C. diphtheriae infection were reported by 9 centres. Two of these showed diphtheria toxin (DT) related systemic symptoms and four exhibited systemic inflammation requiring complex management. The remaining 25 cases, with exclusively cutaneous manifestations, were afebrile. Treatment with topical antiseptics and systemic antibiotics, mainly aminopenicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) (35%) or clindamycin (25%), achieved eradication in all but two cases treated with aminopenicillin/BLI. Treatment duration varied between 5 and 17 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In refugees presenting with chronic skin wounds, C. diphtheriae should be included into the differential diagnosis. Fever seems to be a valuable marker to differentiate severe cases with potentially DT-mediated sequelae from exclusively cutaneous diphtheria (CD). For afebrile CD, topical antiseptics and oral antibiotic therapy with clindamycin for 7 days, followed by clinical surveillance appears to be a safe treatment regimen. Patients with CD who present with fever or pharyngitis should be thoroughly investigated including blood and pharyngeal swab cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"329-337"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825593/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}