Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases最新文献

Background: Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is an uncommon non-neoplastic idiopathic inflammation of adipose tissue, mainly affecting the mesentery of the small intestine, with its etiology remaining largely speculative. The difference in prevalence of MP among females and males varies across multiple studies. In most cases, MP is asymptomatic; however, patients can present with nonspecific abdominal symptoms or can mimic underlying gastrointestinal and abdominal diseases. The diagnosis is suggested by computed tomography and is usually confirmed by surgical biopsies if necessary. Treatment is generally supportive and based on a few selected drugs, namely, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. Surgery is reserved when the diagnosis is unclear, when malignancy is suspected or in the case of severe presentation such as mass effect, bowel obstruction, or ischemic changes.

Summary: MP is a rare inflammatory condition of the mesentery often asymptomatic but can cause nonspecific abdominal symptoms. Diagnosis relies on computed tomography imaging, with treatment mainly supportive, utilizing medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids, while surgery is reserved for severe cases or diagnostic uncertainty.

Key messages: MP causes abdominal pain, and it is mainly diagnosed with CT scan.

Introduction: This study focuses on developing and validating an e-learning educational program for nurturing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) nursing specialists.

Methods: The program was developed using the attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction models within the instructional design framework. The program validation encompassed four steps: (1) nurses took a basic IBD knowledge test (pretest), (2) participants scoring <80% were encouraged to undergo web-based training, (3) a follow-up test (posttest) gauged post-training improvement, and (4) participant satisfaction with e-learning was assessed.

Results: The analysis included 63 participants. The average score in the pretest was 81.3%, 40 participants exceeded the pretest passing score, which is 80% (average: 88.3%), and 23 participants failed (average: 69.1%). Of those who failed, 19 participants showed improvement after undergoing web-based training, with their posttest scores exceeding the passing threshold (average: 97.4%). The comparison results between the passing and failing groups revealed no correlation between the baseline characteristics of the participants. The participants were highly satisfied with the e-learning program.

Conclusion: The program was effective as an educational program for acquiring basic knowledge to foster IBD nursing professionals. The learning design was adapted to the participants' lifestyles and tailored to the readiness of the nurse, ensuring a satisfactory e-learning user experience for the nurses.

Introduction: Small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a sensitive modality for screening the entire SB of patients with Crohn's disease (CD); however, the prognostic impact of the results is unclear. We evaluated the ability of the SBCE score to predict therapeutic intervention for patients with CD and SB lesions without clinical symptoms as well as negative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

Methods: Fifty-six patients who underwent a patency evaluation and had a CD activity index (CDAI) score <150 mg/dL and CRP level <0.5 mg/dL were included. Twenty-one and 35 patients had CD classified as Montreal classifications L1 and L3, respectively. The initial SBCE scores were subsequently grouped according to the presence or absence of intervention based on cutoff values. We examined whether the scores could predict the need for therapeutic intervention at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. The CD activity in capsule endoscopy (CDACE) score was used as the SBCE score.

Results: The median observation period was 1,326 days. Twenty-one patients received therapeutic intervention. There were significant differences between patients with and without treatment intervention according to the CDACE cutoff value of 420 at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Significant differences between patients with Montreal classification L1 with and without intervention were observed at 1 year and 2 years. The CDACE score was moderately and strongly correlated with the Lewis score and capsule endoscopy CDAI score, respectively (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: ρ = 0.6462 and ρ = 0.9199, respectively; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: A CDACE score ≥420 is predictive of intervention after 1 year for patients with CD, a CDAI score <150, and a CRP level <0.5 mg/dL. A larger study with a prospective design is necessary to validate our findings.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal complications are common after solid organ transplantation. New-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after transplantation (de novo) is a major differential diagnosis of diarrhea after liver transplantation (LT) because of its high incidence in the field. However, the incidence of IBD after kidney transplantation (KT) remains unknown.

Methods: This case series comprised six de novo IBD patients who had undergone KT at our hospital from April 1998 to December 2020. In this period, 232 KT recipients were identified. Participants were analyzed based on their colonoscopy diagnoses. Detailed clinical information regarding both KT- and IBD-related symptoms or outcomes was obtained, and we calculated the incidence of de novo IBD from the date of KT.

Results: Of the 232 recipients in the median observation period of 6.1 (interquartile range: 2.6, 10.8) years, six recipients (one with Crohn's disease and five with ulcerative colitis) were diagnosed with de novo IBD. The incidence of de novo IBD after KT was 355.8/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 159.8-791.9 per 100,000 person-years). Bloody stools and diarrhea did not always occur, with bloody stools occurring in three and diarrhea in 2 patients at the time of diagnosis. No recipient developed graft failure or extraintestinal complications (e.g., IBD-related nephritis or arthritis).

Conclusion: Despite a small sample size, this study's results indicate that the incidence of de novo IBD after KT may be similar to that after LT and higher than that in the general population. Larger studies are required to validate these preliminary findings.

Introduction: The comprehensive complication index (CCI), which weights all postoperative complications according to severity and integrates them into a single formula, has been reported as a new evaluation system. We aimed to compare the CCI with the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods: Patients who underwent initial surgery for UC from April 2012 to March 2020 were included. The patients were classified into a length of stay (LOS) >30 days group or an LOS ≤30 days group. We performed a multivariate analysis of risk factors for LOS >30 days in the model with the factors identified in the univariate analysis plus the CCI (the CCI model) and plus CDC (the CDC model). An ROC curve was used to test the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) between the CCI model and the CDC model.

Results: The median LOS was 21 days (IQR: 16-29 days), and the rate of LOS >30 days was 119/588 (20.2%). In the CCI model, age at the time of surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.45, p = 0.01), ASA score ≥3 (OR = 1.94, 95% CI:1.00-3.76, p = 0.04), and CCI (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.09; p < 0.01) were identified as independent risk factors for LOS >30 days. The AUC value of the CCI model (0.86) was significantly better in relation to LOS >30 days than that of the CDC model (0.82) (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: The CCI was a better measure of LOS than was the CDC and was found to be a useful indicator in UC.

Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery (LAP) is now recognized as the standard procedure for colorectal surgery. However, the standard surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) is total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), which may be an overly complex procedure to complete laparoscopically. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy as well as the advantages and disadvantages of LAP-IPAA in patients with UC stratified by the outcome of interest.

Method: We performed a systematic literature review by searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Japan Centra Reuvo Medicina databases from inception until January 2023. Meta-analyses were performed for surgical outcomes, including morbidity and surgical course, to evaluate the efficacy of LAP-IPAA.

Results: A total of 707 participants, including 341 LAP and 366 open surgery (OPEN) patients in 9 observational studies and one randomized controlled study, were included. From the results of the meta-analyses, the odds ratio (OR) of total complications in LAP was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.58-2.17, p = 0.74). The OR of mortality for LAP was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.08-1.92, p = 0.24). Although the duration of surgery was extended in LAP (mean difference (MD) 118.74 min (95% CI: 91.67-145.81), p < 0.01) and hospital stay were not shortened, the duration until oral intake after surgery was shortened in LAP (MD -2.10 days (95% CI: -3.52-0.68), p = 0.004).

Conclusions: During IPAA for UC, a similar morbidity rate was seen for LAP and OPEN. Although LAP necessitates extended surgery, there may be certain advantages to this procedure, including easy visibility during the surgical procedure or a shortened time to oral intake after surgery.

Introduction: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC). Intestinal ischemia may occur if the main blood vessels are ligated at an early stage of this surgery. Considering that the blood flow in the large intestine can be maintained by preserving the middle colic artery, we have used a new IPAA method: ligating the middle colic artery immediately before removal of the specimens ("M-method"). Here, we evaluated the M-method's clinical outcomes.

Methods: Between April 2009 and December 2021, 13 patients underwent a laparoscopy-assisted IPAA procedure at our institution. The conventional method was used for 6 patients, and the M-method was used for the other 7 patients. We retrospectively analyzed the cases' clinical notes.

Results: The M-method's rate of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or more) was significantly lower than that of the conventional method (14.2% vs. 83.3%). The M-method group's postoperative stay period was also significantly shorter (average 16.4 days vs. 55.5). There were significant differences in the albumin value and the ratio of the modified GPS score 1 or 2 on the 7th postoperative day between the M- and conventional methods (average 3.15 vs. 2.5, average 4/7 vs. 6/6). However, it is necessary to consider the small number of cases and the uncontrolled historical comparison.

Conclusion: Late ligation of the middle colic artery may be beneficial for patients' post-surgery recovery and can be recommended for IPAAs in UC patients.