Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases最新文献

Introduction: With the recent increase in number of drugs for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has become important to select treatments acceptable to patients. Endoscopy and biomarkers from blood and stool samples are used to evaluate IBD disease activity. This study aimed to clarify the acceptability of usage of advanced therapy and examination methods in patients through an internet-based survey.

Methods: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were asked via the internet to participate in a survey on the acceptability of nine therapies and three examination methods. The respondents rated acceptability on a scale of 1-10 and specified the most preferred option.

Results: Responses were obtained from 388 patients with ulcerative colitis and 82 with Crohn's disease; 14.5% and 11.5% of the patients underwent intravenous infusions and subcutaneous injections, respectively. Once-daily oral administration had the highest acceptability score, which was significantly different from other administration usages (p < 0.0001), regardless of prior treatment history. Oral administration was preferred by 88.9% of patients. The ranking of examination methods from most to least acceptable was blood tests > endoscopy > stool tests, with significant differences among all groups (p < 0.0001). Blood testing (76%) and stool testing (4.5%) were the most and least preferred methods, respectively.

Conclusions: The most acceptable usage of advanced therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was once-daily oral administration. Treatments that are effective, safe, and acceptable to patients should be selected, and examination methods acceptable to patients should be used.

Introduction: The Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) is a national cohort that was established in 2015 with the aim of improving quality of care of affected adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Between 2020 and 2022, paper questionnaires were gradually replaced by fully electronic data capture using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap^®) software. We aim to provide an update of the SEECS 8 years after its launch.

Methods: The SEECS prospectively includes adults (≥18 years of age) with EoE as well as patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy control subjects (HC). Upon inclusion and follow-up (typically once every 12-18 months), patients and physicians complete REDCap^® questionnaires, which are available in German, French, and English. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biologic findings are assessed on the same day using validated instruments (EEsAI PRO for symptoms; EoE-QoL-A for QoL; EREFS for endoscopic activity; modified EoE-HSS for histologic activity). The SEECS biobank includes biosamples from patients with EoE, GERD, and HC.

Results: As of July 2023, the SEECS included 778 patients (716 [92%] with EoE, 29 [3.8%] with GERD, and 33 [4.2%] HC; 559/778 [71.9%] were male). Mean age ± SD (years) at enrollment according to diagnosis was as follows: EoE 41.9 ± 12.9, GERD 53.6 ± 16.4, HC 51.7 ± 17.2. Concomitant GERD was found in 200 patients (27.9%) of the EoE cohort. Concomitant allergic disorders (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, eczema) were present in 500 EoE patients (74.4%). At inclusion, 686 (95.8%) of EoE patients were on ongoing treatment (orodispersible budesonide tablet [Jorveza^®] in 281 patients [41%]; budesonide or fluticasone syrup or swallowed powder in 290 patients [42.3%]; proton-pump inhibitors in 162 patients [23.6%]; elimination diets in 103 patients [15%]; and esophageal dilation at last visit in 166 patients [24.2%]). A total of 8,698 biosamples were collected, of which 1,395 (16%) were used in the framework of translational research projects.

Conclusion: SEECS continuously grows and is operational using fully electronic data capture. SEECS offers up-to-date epidemiologic and real-world clinical efficacy data on EoE and promotes clinical and translational research.

Background: The effectiveness of dietary therapy to induce remission of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been evaluated over the last decades and summarized in meta-analyses. Choosing the dietary modality, identifying the most suitable patients, and implementing specific prerequisites are essential to ensure long-term success.

Summary: Impractical exclusive elemental diets provided the highest remission rates in EoE; however, they are not recommended due to their numerous disadvantages and detrimental effects on patient quality of life. Allergy testing-guided diets for EoE are limited; their insufficient effectiveness and low reproducibility are due to poor accuracy of skin or serum test results in identifying EoE food triggers. Initial experiences with a six-food elimination diet have provided evidence of high and predictive effectiveness rates and paved the way for less restrictive and more efficient step-up approaches, including four-food, two-food, and most recently, milk elimination diets. Dietary treatment for EoE is challenging for patients and families and requires certain skills to ensure success in the short and long term.

Key messages: The selection of appropriate patients is essential to ensure the success of and long-term adherence to dietary treatment of EoE. As normal triggers for EoE are commonly found in the staple diet, it is important to ensure adequate nutritional substitutes to avoid nutrient deficiency risks when long-lasting feeding difficulties or extensive restrictions are present. Specialized facilities in dietary therapy should adopt patient-centered and personalized approaches in order to provide timely monitoring and support for complex cases.

Background: Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is an uncommon non-neoplastic idiopathic inflammation of adipose tissue, mainly affecting the mesentery of the small intestine, with its etiology remaining largely speculative. The difference in prevalence of MP among females and males varies across multiple studies. In most cases, MP is asymptomatic; however, patients can present with nonspecific abdominal symptoms or can mimic underlying gastrointestinal and abdominal diseases. The diagnosis is suggested by computed tomography and is usually confirmed by surgical biopsies if necessary. Treatment is generally supportive and based on a few selected drugs, namely, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. Surgery is reserved when the diagnosis is unclear, when malignancy is suspected or in the case of severe presentation such as mass effect, bowel obstruction, or ischemic changes.

Summary: MP is a rare inflammatory condition of the mesentery often asymptomatic but can cause nonspecific abdominal symptoms. Diagnosis relies on computed tomography imaging, with treatment mainly supportive, utilizing medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids, while surgery is reserved for severe cases or diagnostic uncertainty.

Key messages: MP causes abdominal pain, and it is mainly diagnosed with CT scan.

Introduction: This study focuses on developing and validating an e-learning educational program for nurturing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) nursing specialists.

Methods: The program was developed using the attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction models within the instructional design framework. The program validation encompassed four steps: (1) nurses took a basic IBD knowledge test (pretest), (2) participants scoring <80% were encouraged to undergo web-based training, (3) a follow-up test (posttest) gauged post-training improvement, and (4) participant satisfaction with e-learning was assessed.

Results: The analysis included 63 participants. The average score in the pretest was 81.3%, 40 participants exceeded the pretest passing score, which is 80% (average: 88.3%), and 23 participants failed (average: 69.1%). Of those who failed, 19 participants showed improvement after undergoing web-based training, with their posttest scores exceeding the passing threshold (average: 97.4%). The comparison results between the passing and failing groups revealed no correlation between the baseline characteristics of the participants. The participants were highly satisfied with the e-learning program.

Conclusion: The program was effective as an educational program for acquiring basic knowledge to foster IBD nursing professionals. The learning design was adapted to the participants' lifestyles and tailored to the readiness of the nurse, ensuring a satisfactory e-learning user experience for the nurses.

Introduction: Small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a sensitive modality for screening the entire SB of patients with Crohn's disease (CD); however, the prognostic impact of the results is unclear. We evaluated the ability of the SBCE score to predict therapeutic intervention for patients with CD and SB lesions without clinical symptoms as well as negative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

Methods: Fifty-six patients who underwent a patency evaluation and had a CD activity index (CDAI) score <150 mg/dL and CRP level <0.5 mg/dL were included. Twenty-one and 35 patients had CD classified as Montreal classifications L1 and L3, respectively. The initial SBCE scores were subsequently grouped according to the presence or absence of intervention based on cutoff values. We examined whether the scores could predict the need for therapeutic intervention at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. The CD activity in capsule endoscopy (CDACE) score was used as the SBCE score.

Results: The median observation period was 1,326 days. Twenty-one patients received therapeutic intervention. There were significant differences between patients with and without treatment intervention according to the CDACE cutoff value of 420 at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Significant differences between patients with Montreal classification L1 with and without intervention were observed at 1 year and 2 years. The CDACE score was moderately and strongly correlated with the Lewis score and capsule endoscopy CDAI score, respectively (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: ρ = 0.6462 and ρ = 0.9199, respectively; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: A CDACE score ≥420 is predictive of intervention after 1 year for patients with CD, a CDAI score <150, and a CRP level <0.5 mg/dL. A larger study with a prospective design is necessary to validate our findings.