Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with those of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for rectal tumors extending to the dentate line (RTDLs).
Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 2025 for studies that reported the clinical outcomes of EMR or ESD for RTDLs.
Results: Fifteen studies (237 for EMR and 564 for ESD) were included in this meta-analysis. The en bloc resection rate (0.961 vs. 0.097; p = 0.000) was significantly greater in the ESD group than in the EMR group, and the local recurrence rate (0.023 vs. 0.188; p = 0.000) was significantly lower in the ESD group. No significant differences in the complete resection rate (0.793 vs. 0.823, p = 0.869) were noted between the ESD and EMR groups. In terms of adverse events, there were no differences in the postoperative bleeding rate (0.067 vs. 0.082; p = 0.677), perforation rate (0 vs.0; p = 0.605) or stricture rate (0.022 vs. 0.042; p = 0.378) between the ESD and EMR groups.
Conclusion: ESD and EMR are effective and safe treatments for RTDLs; however, compared with EMR, ESD is associated with a higher en bloc resection rate and a lower local recurrence rate.
目的:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)和内镜下粘膜切除(EMR)治疗延伸至齿状线(rtdl)的直肠肿瘤的疗效和安全性。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,检索了截至2025年7月报道了EMR或ESD治疗rtdl临床结果的研究。结果:15项研究(237项EMR研究和564项ESD研究)纳入本荟萃分析。ESD组整体切除率(0.961比0.097,p = 0.000)显著高于EMR组,局部复发率(0.023比0.188,p = 0.000)显著低于EMR组。ESD组与EMR组的完全切除率无显著差异(0.793 vs. 0.823, p = 0.869)。在不良事件方面,ESD组与EMR组术后出血率(0.067 vs 0.082, p = 0.677)、穿孔率(0 vs.0, p = 0.605)、狭窄率(0.022 vs. 0.042, p = 0.378)差异无统计学意义。结论:ESD和EMR是治疗RTDLs有效、安全的方法;然而,与EMR相比,ESD与更高的整体切除率和更低的局部复发率相关。
{"title":"Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for the treatment of rectal tumors extending to the dentate line: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Cong Ding, Jianfeng Yang, Jing Yang, Yifeng Zhou, Hui Wang, Shouyuan Xu, Hongzhang Shen, Qiang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05069-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05069-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with those of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for rectal tumors extending to the dentate line (RTDLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 2025 for studies that reported the clinical outcomes of EMR or ESD for RTDLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies (237 for EMR and 564 for ESD) were included in this meta-analysis. The en bloc resection rate (0.961 vs. 0.097; p = 0.000) was significantly greater in the ESD group than in the EMR group, and the local recurrence rate (0.023 vs. 0.188; p = 0.000) was significantly lower in the ESD group. No significant differences in the complete resection rate (0.793 vs. 0.823, p = 0.869) were noted between the ESD and EMR groups. In terms of adverse events, there were no differences in the postoperative bleeding rate (0.067 vs. 0.082; p = 0.677), perforation rate (0 vs.0; p = 0.605) or stricture rate (0.022 vs. 0.042; p = 0.378) between the ESD and EMR groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESD and EMR are effective and safe treatments for RTDLs; however, compared with EMR, ESD is associated with a higher en bloc resection rate and a lower local recurrence rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145943482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05067-6
Qing Sun, Ruolin Sun, Bokun He, Hongjie Meng, Jie Jin
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor worldwide. The cholesterol synthesis (CS) pathway is crucial in the occurrence and development of cancer. This study aims to predict the prognosis of CRC patients based on the cholesterol synthesis-related genes (CSRGs).
Methods: The patient data of CRC were downloaded from the TCGA and GEO databases, and the CSRGs were downloaded from Genecards. In the TCGA-CRC training set, univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted on the CSRGs, and subtype classification was performed through consensus clustering. Combined with the PPI network and regression analysis, key CSRGs were identified to establish a prognostic model. ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to evaluate the model and validate it in the GSE17538 validation set. At the same time, immune analysis and drug sensitivity analysis were conducted. Finally, the functions of these characteristic genes were investigated in an in vitro cell model.
Results: The TCGA-CRC was divided into two subtypes. A 10-gene Cholesterol Synthesis-related Risk Signature (CSRS) was constructed. The patients were grouped according to the median value of the CSRS. The high-CSRS group had a poorer prognosis, and the abundance of macrophages, neutrophils, and TIL was higher in this group. The drug sensitivity prediction indicated that several candidate drugs (such as Linsitinib) might affect the progression of CRC through unique mechanisms. In vitro experiments demonstrated that EEF1A2 could promote the malignant progression of tumors.
Conclusion: The results of this project provide some guidance for elucidating potential CS-related biomarkers for predicting prognosis in CRC patients.
{"title":"The subtype identification of colorectal cancer and construction of the risk model based on cholesterol synthesis-related genes to predict prognosis and guide immunotherapy.","authors":"Qing Sun, Ruolin Sun, Bokun He, Hongjie Meng, Jie Jin","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05067-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05067-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor worldwide. The cholesterol synthesis (CS) pathway is crucial in the occurrence and development of cancer. This study aims to predict the prognosis of CRC patients based on the cholesterol synthesis-related genes (CSRGs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patient data of CRC were downloaded from the TCGA and GEO databases, and the CSRGs were downloaded from Genecards. In the TCGA-CRC training set, univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted on the CSRGs, and subtype classification was performed through consensus clustering. Combined with the PPI network and regression analysis, key CSRGs were identified to establish a prognostic model. ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to evaluate the model and validate it in the GSE17538 validation set. At the same time, immune analysis and drug sensitivity analysis were conducted. Finally, the functions of these characteristic genes were investigated in an in vitro cell model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TCGA-CRC was divided into two subtypes. A 10-gene Cholesterol Synthesis-related Risk Signature (CSRS) was constructed. The patients were grouped according to the median value of the CSRS. The high-CSRS group had a poorer prognosis, and the abundance of macrophages, neutrophils, and TIL was higher in this group. The drug sensitivity prediction indicated that several candidate drugs (such as Linsitinib) might affect the progression of CRC through unique mechanisms. In vitro experiments demonstrated that EEF1A2 could promote the malignant progression of tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this project provide some guidance for elucidating potential CS-related biomarkers for predicting prognosis in CRC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":" ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789220/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05060-z
M Delorme, E Agger, F Jörgren, M L Lydrup, H Hagman, P Buchwald
Purpose: High-risk colon cancer may benefit from preoperative chemotherapy (preCHT), but evidence on its short-term safety and outcome is limited. Population-based evidence before its incorporation into national guidelines is lacking.
Methods: Patients with final weighted stage II-III colon cancer undergoing elective resection between 2007 and 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients planned for preCHT, irrespective of intention, were compared with those undergoing upfront surgery. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality and 30-day major morbidity, defined as all medical and surgical complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 grade. Subgroup analyses examined cT4 disease, and multivariable logistic regression was performed.
Results: Among 20,185 eligible patients, 299 (1.5%) received preCHT. Postoperative mortality was comparable (1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.00 at 30 days and 3.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.82 at 90 days). Overall and surgical postoperative morbidity (CD ≥ 3) was higher in the preCHT group (34.1 vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001 and 17.4% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), rates of anastomotic leakage were similar (3.3% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.85). Compared to upfront surgery, the preCHT group was more likely to undergo multivisceral resections (53.9% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of R1 resections (6.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), reflecting more advanced disease (cT4: 59.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001; cN1-2: 54.9% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). In the cT4 subgroup, short-term outcomes were comparable, and regression analyses found no independent association between preCHT and mortality or major morbidity.
Conclusion: PreCHT appeared feasible in cT4N0-2M0 colon cancer, with short-term outcomes comparable to upfront surgery despite more advanced primary tumour and greater surgical extent.
目的:高危结肠癌可能受益于术前化疗(preCHT),但其短期安全性和结果的证据有限。在将其纳入国家指南之前,缺乏基于人口的证据。方法:在2007年至2017年期间,在瑞典结直肠癌登记处确定了最终加权II-III期结肠癌择期切除的患者。计划进行preCHT的患者,无论其意图如何,与接受前期手术的患者进行比较。主要结局是30天和90天死亡率和30天主要发病率,定义为所有内科和外科并发症分类为Clavien-Dindo (CD)≥3级。亚组分析检查cT4疾病,并进行多变量logistic回归。结果:在20185例符合条件的患者中,299例(1.5%)接受了preCHT治疗。术后死亡率相当(30天1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.00; 90天3.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.82)。preCHT组的总体和手术后发病率(CD≥3)更高(34.1 vs. 25.0%, p)。结论:preCHT在cT4N0-2M0结肠癌中是可行的,尽管原发肿瘤更晚期,手术范围更大,但短期结果与术前相当。
{"title":"Preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer and short-term outcomes-a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"M Delorme, E Agger, F Jörgren, M L Lydrup, H Hagman, P Buchwald","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05060-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05060-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-risk colon cancer may benefit from preoperative chemotherapy (preCHT), but evidence on its short-term safety and outcome is limited. Population-based evidence before its incorporation into national guidelines is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with final weighted stage II-III colon cancer undergoing elective resection between 2007 and 2017 were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients planned for preCHT, irrespective of intention, were compared with those undergoing upfront surgery. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality and 30-day major morbidity, defined as all medical and surgical complications classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 grade. Subgroup analyses examined cT4 disease, and multivariable logistic regression was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20,185 eligible patients, 299 (1.5%) received preCHT. Postoperative mortality was comparable (1.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.00 at 30 days and 3.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.82 at 90 days). Overall and surgical postoperative morbidity (CD ≥ 3) was higher in the preCHT group (34.1 vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001 and 17.4% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001), rates of anastomotic leakage were similar (3.3% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.85). Compared to upfront surgery, the preCHT group was more likely to undergo multivisceral resections (53.9% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001), with a higher rate of R1 resections (6.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), reflecting more advanced disease (cT4: 59.5% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001; cN1-2: 54.9% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). In the cT4 subgroup, short-term outcomes were comparable, and regression analyses found no independent association between preCHT and mortality or major morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PreCHT appeared feasible in cT4N0-2M0 colon cancer, with short-term outcomes comparable to upfront surgery despite more advanced primary tumour and greater surgical extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":" ","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789098/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05071-w
Jeff Wennerlund, David Thalén, Anton Östevind, Ulf Gunnarsson, Karin Strigård
Purpose: Faecal incontinence is common in persons with severe obesity. Little is known about how the thicknesses of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and the external anal sphincter (EAS) change in relation to weight loss following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). This study aims to investigate any change in IAS and EAS thickness 6 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) and to determine whether any such change correlates with a change in faecal incontinence pattern.
Methods: Thirty-one patients underwent three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound to measure anal sphincter thickness before and 6 months after RYGB. Patients completed the validated Wexner and LARS (low anterior resection syndrome) questionnaires at the same time to evaluate any change in faecal incontinence and urgency symptoms following surgery.
Results: No significant change in the thicknesses of the IAS and EAS was seen. The Wexner score decreased from 18 to 13 (less incontinence). Conversely, the number of patients with LARS increased from 10 to 15 six months after surgery (more urgency).
Conclusion: RYGB had no effect on the thickness of the anal sphincter 6 months after surgery. However, the pattern of faecal incontinence changed, with a decrease in leakage and whole faecal incontinence and an increase in urgency.
{"title":"Change in faecal incontinence pattern after gastric bypass surgery: related to change in anal sphincter thickness?","authors":"Jeff Wennerlund, David Thalén, Anton Östevind, Ulf Gunnarsson, Karin Strigård","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05071-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05071-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Faecal incontinence is common in persons with severe obesity. Little is known about how the thicknesses of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and the external anal sphincter (EAS) change in relation to weight loss following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). This study aims to investigate any change in IAS and EAS thickness 6 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) and to determine whether any such change correlates with a change in faecal incontinence pattern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one patients underwent three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound to measure anal sphincter thickness before and 6 months after RYGB. Patients completed the validated Wexner and LARS (low anterior resection syndrome) questionnaires at the same time to evaluate any change in faecal incontinence and urgency symptoms following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant change in the thicknesses of the IAS and EAS was seen. The Wexner score decreased from 18 to 13 (less incontinence). Conversely, the number of patients with LARS increased from 10 to 15 six months after surgery (more urgency).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RYGB had no effect on the thickness of the anal sphincter 6 months after surgery. However, the pattern of faecal incontinence changed, with a decrease in leakage and whole faecal incontinence and an increase in urgency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789103/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145943455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although tumor deposits (TDs) are established prognostic indicators, their molecular characteristics and potential for improving risk stratification remain unexplored.
Methods: We performed an integrative analysis of transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA and GEO databases to identify TD-associated molecular signatures. A hybrid ML framework combining random survival forest and stepwise Cox regression was developed to construct a risk stratification model. Model performance was validated through survival analysis, time-dependent ROC curves, and multivariate analyses. Gene set enrichment analysis explored underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications.
Results: The integrated molecular signature-based model demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy, effectively stratifying patients into risk groups with distinct survival outcomes (P < 0.001) and clinicopathological features. High-risk patients exhibited enhanced immune evasion mechanisms and differential drug sensitivity patterns. Pathway analysis revealed significant alterations in ECM receptor interaction, PPAR signaling, and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathways.
Conclusions: Our machine learning-based integration of TD molecular signatures establishes a robust risk stratification model for COAD patients, offering improved prognostic accuracy and valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies. Our findings highlight the potential of interpretable machine learning in molecular oncology risk modeling.
{"title":"Machine learning-based integration of tumor deposit molecular signatures improves prognostic stratification in colon adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Jiaying Wu, Jiaming Wu, Zhen Zheng, Shuangqin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05073-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05073-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although tumor deposits (TDs) are established prognostic indicators, their molecular characteristics and potential for improving risk stratification remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an integrative analysis of transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA and GEO databases to identify TD-associated molecular signatures. A hybrid ML framework combining random survival forest and stepwise Cox regression was developed to construct a risk stratification model. Model performance was validated through survival analysis, time-dependent ROC curves, and multivariate analyses. Gene set enrichment analysis explored underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integrated molecular signature-based model demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy, effectively stratifying patients into risk groups with distinct survival outcomes (P < 0.001) and clinicopathological features. High-risk patients exhibited enhanced immune evasion mechanisms and differential drug sensitivity patterns. Pathway analysis revealed significant alterations in ECM receptor interaction, PPAR signaling, and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our machine learning-based integration of TD molecular signatures establishes a robust risk stratification model for COAD patients, offering improved prognostic accuracy and valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies. Our findings highlight the potential of interpretable machine learning in molecular oncology risk modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789243/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145943472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05049-8
Hannah R Liefeld, Kristen L Coleman, Kelsey Lawrence, James W Ogilvie
Purpose: Sigmoid resection with end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) is the procedure of choice when a large bowel obstruction secondary to diverticular disease requires surgery. Less morbid alternatives are less common. This study compares a transverse blowhole colostomy as a first-stage intervention in diverticular-associated obstruction. Our primary aim was to compare colostomy reversal rates and postoperative outcomes between blowhole colostomy and Hartmann's procedure.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. An institutional database was utilized to retrospectively identify adult patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure or blowhole colostomy for diverticular strictures with obstruction between 2012 and 2023.
Results: Thirty-nine patients underwent Hartmann's procedure for diverticular strictures with obstruction and 15 patients underwent blowhole colostomy. The blowhole colostomy group had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (median 5 vs. 8 days, p = 0.01). Colostomy reversal was more frequent in the blowhole group (81.3% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.08), with a shorter median time to reversal (3 months vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.01). A significant increase in reversals performed using a minimally invasive approach (84.6% vs. 50%, p < 0.01) occurred in the blowhole colostomy group. No significant differences were observed in other postoperative outcomes, including proximal diversion after colostomy reversal.
Conclusions: Blowhole colostomy may be a viable alternative to a Hartmann's procedure for diverticular-associated large bowel obstruction, offering potential benefits such as shorter hospital stays, higher rates of colostomy reversal, and a greater likelihood of minimally invasive reversal. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Transverse blowhole colostomy versus Hartmann's for urgent management of large bowel obstruction secondary to diverticular stricture.","authors":"Hannah R Liefeld, Kristen L Coleman, Kelsey Lawrence, James W Ogilvie","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05049-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05049-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sigmoid resection with end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) is the procedure of choice when a large bowel obstruction secondary to diverticular disease requires surgery. Less morbid alternatives are less common. This study compares a transverse blowhole colostomy as a first-stage intervention in diverticular-associated obstruction. Our primary aim was to compare colostomy reversal rates and postoperative outcomes between blowhole colostomy and Hartmann's procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. An institutional database was utilized to retrospectively identify adult patients who underwent Hartmann's procedure or blowhole colostomy for diverticular strictures with obstruction between 2012 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients underwent Hartmann's procedure for diverticular strictures with obstruction and 15 patients underwent blowhole colostomy. The blowhole colostomy group had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (median 5 vs. 8 days, p = 0.01). Colostomy reversal was more frequent in the blowhole group (81.3% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.08), with a shorter median time to reversal (3 months vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.01). A significant increase in reversals performed using a minimally invasive approach (84.6% vs. 50%, p < 0.01) occurred in the blowhole colostomy group. No significant differences were observed in other postoperative outcomes, including proximal diversion after colostomy reversal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blowhole colostomy may be a viable alternative to a Hartmann's procedure for diverticular-associated large bowel obstruction, offering potential benefits such as shorter hospital stays, higher rates of colostomy reversal, and a greater likelihood of minimally invasive reversal. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783201/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05056-9
Maolang He, Shuxin Tian, Shangqi Wang, Rui Huo
Background: The relationship between serum lipids and colorectal polyps (CP) remains unclear due to inconsistent findings across prior studies. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the relationship between serum lipid levels and CP risk by using real-world clinical data.
Methods: By utilizing retrospective data from a tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2024, multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS), and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the association between serum lipids and CP. Additionally, the mediating role of inflammation-related indices in the relationship between serum lipids and CP was examined.
Results: Triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) were positively associated with CP risk (P < 0.05). RCS analysis revealed a nonlinear dose-response relationship between TG and CP risk (P for overall < 0.001, nonlinear P < 0.05), with a threshold value of 0.93 mmol/L. Significant interaction effects were observed between TG and TC and gender in relation to CP development. Inflammation-related indices mediated the association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and TC with CP risk (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: This study highlights the potential clinical utility of TG and TC as modifiable biomarkers for CP risk. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and to explore targeted lipid-modifying interventions for high-risk populations.
{"title":"Association between serum lipids and colorectal polyps: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Maolang He, Shuxin Tian, Shangqi Wang, Rui Huo","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05056-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05056-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between serum lipids and colorectal polyps (CP) remains unclear due to inconsistent findings across prior studies. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the relationship between serum lipid levels and CP risk by using real-world clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By utilizing retrospective data from a tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2024, multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS), and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the association between serum lipids and CP. Additionally, the mediating role of inflammation-related indices in the relationship between serum lipids and CP was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) were positively associated with CP risk (P < 0.05). RCS analysis revealed a nonlinear dose-response relationship between TG and CP risk (P for overall < 0.001, nonlinear P < 0.05), with a threshold value of 0.93 mmol/L. Significant interaction effects were observed between TG and TC and gender in relation to CP development. Inflammation-related indices mediated the association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and TC with CP risk (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential clinical utility of TG and TC as modifiable biomarkers for CP risk. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and to explore targeted lipid-modifying interventions for high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05059-6
Osman Civil, Nevin Sakoglu, Atif Tekin, Metin Kement
Purpose: Diverting ileostomies are routinely created during low rectal cancer surgery, yet 15-30% remain permanent. Understanding predictors of non-reversal is essential for informed patient counseling. This study investigated factors preventing ileostomy closure following colorectal surgery, primarily for rectal malignancy.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from patients undergoing diverting ileostomy creation (January 2015-December 2020). Exclusions included early postoperative mortality (within 30 days), follow-up less than 6 months, or missing primary outcome data. Demographics, surgical details, and reversal outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of non-reversal.
Results: Of 508 patients, 456 met inclusion criteria (mean age 58.9 ± 13.2 years, 63.8% male). Malignancy accounted for 96.7% of cases, with low anterior resection performed in 83.8%. Ileostomy closure was achieved in 364 patients (79.8%) at a median of 6 months (mean 7.4 ± 5.3). The non-reversal rate was 20.2% (92 patients). Main reasons included mortality (35.8%), metastatic disease (23.9%), and anastomotic complications (22.8%). Multivariable analysis identified ASA score 3-4 (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.58-4.54, p < 0.001) and malignant pathology (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.23-21.3, p = 0.025) as independent predictors of non-reversal. Age showed statistical but limited clinical significance.
Conclusion: One in five patients with diverting ileostomies will not undergo reversal. High ASA scores, malignant disease, mortality, metastatic progression, and anastomotic complications are primary barriers. These findings emphasize the need for realistic preoperative counseling regarding permanent stoma risk.
目的:转移回肠造口术在低位直肠癌手术中是常规的,但15-30%是永久性的。了解非逆转的预测因素对于知情的患者咨询至关重要。本研究主要针对直肠恶性肿瘤,探讨结直肠手术后阻碍回肠造口闭合的因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究对2015年1月- 2020年12月行回肠造口术患者的前瞻性数据进行分析。排除包括术后早期死亡(30天内)、随访时间少于6个月或缺少主要结局数据。分析了人口统计学、手术细节和逆转结果。多变量逻辑回归确定了非逆转的独立预测因子。结果:508例患者中,456例符合纳入标准(平均年龄58.9±13.2岁,男性占63.8%)。恶性肿瘤占96.7%,低位前切除术占83.8%。364例患者(79.8%)在中位6个月(平均7.4±5.3)内实现回肠造口闭合。未逆转率为20.2%(92例)。主要原因包括死亡(35.8%)、转移性疾病(23.9%)和吻合口并发症(22.8%)。多变量分析确定ASA评分为3-4 (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.58-4.54, p)。结论:1 / 5的患者将不会进行转路回肠造口手术。高ASA评分、恶性疾病、死亡率、转移性进展和吻合口并发症是主要障碍。这些发现强调了对永久性造口风险进行实际的术前咨询的必要性。
{"title":"Risk factors for non-reversal of diverting ileostomies: a retrospective analysis of 456 patients.","authors":"Osman Civil, Nevin Sakoglu, Atif Tekin, Metin Kement","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05059-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05059-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diverting ileostomies are routinely created during low rectal cancer surgery, yet 15-30% remain permanent. Understanding predictors of non-reversal is essential for informed patient counseling. This study investigated factors preventing ileostomy closure following colorectal surgery, primarily for rectal malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from patients undergoing diverting ileostomy creation (January 2015-December 2020). Exclusions included early postoperative mortality (within 30 days), follow-up less than 6 months, or missing primary outcome data. Demographics, surgical details, and reversal outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of non-reversal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 508 patients, 456 met inclusion criteria (mean age 58.9 ± 13.2 years, 63.8% male). Malignancy accounted for 96.7% of cases, with low anterior resection performed in 83.8%. Ileostomy closure was achieved in 364 patients (79.8%) at a median of 6 months (mean 7.4 ± 5.3). The non-reversal rate was 20.2% (92 patients). Main reasons included mortality (35.8%), metastatic disease (23.9%), and anastomotic complications (22.8%). Multivariable analysis identified ASA score 3-4 (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.58-4.54, p < 0.001) and malignant pathology (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.23-21.3, p = 0.025) as independent predictors of non-reversal. Age showed statistical but limited clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in five patients with diverting ileostomies will not undergo reversal. High ASA scores, malignant disease, mortality, metastatic progression, and anastomotic complications are primary barriers. These findings emphasize the need for realistic preoperative counseling regarding permanent stoma risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783148/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05064-9
Eleftherios Christodoulis, Panagiotis Ntellas, Lilly Simpson, Katerina Dadouli, Jacqueline Connell, Kok Haw Jonathan Lim, Joseph Williams, Jurjees Hasan, Marios Adamou, Saifee Mullamitha, Daniel Anderson, Francisca Marti Marti, Michael Braun, Mark Saunders, Tess Gillham, Konstantinos Kamposioras
Background: Emotional engagement, family support and personal beliefs can influence how patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceive cancer differently. This study examined the extent to which the views of patients and HCPs on cancer care align, and identified factors that may underlie disparities.
Methods: Participants with colorectal cancer (CRC) were asked to describe their perception of their disease (i.e. whether they felt it was under control (DC), was progressing (PD), or was of an unknown status) and to complete psychometric assessments of anxiety, depression, PTSD and well-being. Two HCPs, who were blinded to the patients' responses, examined the case files to determine the stage of treatment at which the patients were enrolled in the study. The concordance of perceptions between patients and HCPs was examined, along with associations with clinical variables and psychometric health outcomes, using both univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: A total of 205 patients with CRC were included in the study. The mean age was 65 years, with 58% of patients being male. Overall, a significant difference in perception was observed between HCPs and patients (p < 0.001), particularly for patients identified by HCPs as having PD. Significant discrepancies were observed among patients receiving palliative care (p < 0.001), whereas those in the adjuvant or neo-adjuvant pathway appeared to align more closely with HCPs' perceptions (p = 0.99). Neither demographic nor psychological factors were significant determinants of concordance between HCPs and patients' understanding of cancer status in this population. In multivariate analysis, patients perceiving PD or expressing uncertainty were found to have significantly higher levels of depression than those with DC (OR 6.42, p = 0.001 and OR 3.86, p = 0.009, respectively).
Conclusions: This study reveals significant differences in how cancer is perceived by HCPs and patients, particularly among those without disease control or undergoing palliative care. This highlights the importance of effective communication in addressing patients' needs and their psychological well-being.
{"title":"Exploring perceptual disparities: A study on the level of understanding of colorectal cancer care among patients and healthcare professionals.","authors":"Eleftherios Christodoulis, Panagiotis Ntellas, Lilly Simpson, Katerina Dadouli, Jacqueline Connell, Kok Haw Jonathan Lim, Joseph Williams, Jurjees Hasan, Marios Adamou, Saifee Mullamitha, Daniel Anderson, Francisca Marti Marti, Michael Braun, Mark Saunders, Tess Gillham, Konstantinos Kamposioras","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05064-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05064-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emotional engagement, family support and personal beliefs can influence how patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) perceive cancer differently. This study examined the extent to which the views of patients and HCPs on cancer care align, and identified factors that may underlie disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with colorectal cancer (CRC) were asked to describe their perception of their disease (i.e. whether they felt it was under control (DC), was progressing (PD), or was of an unknown status) and to complete psychometric assessments of anxiety, depression, PTSD and well-being. Two HCPs, who were blinded to the patients' responses, examined the case files to determine the stage of treatment at which the patients were enrolled in the study. The concordance of perceptions between patients and HCPs was examined, along with associations with clinical variables and psychometric health outcomes, using both univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 patients with CRC were included in the study. The mean age was 65 years, with 58% of patients being male. Overall, a significant difference in perception was observed between HCPs and patients (p < 0.001), particularly for patients identified by HCPs as having PD. Significant discrepancies were observed among patients receiving palliative care (p < 0.001), whereas those in the adjuvant or neo-adjuvant pathway appeared to align more closely with HCPs' perceptions (p = 0.99). Neither demographic nor psychological factors were significant determinants of concordance between HCPs and patients' understanding of cancer status in this population. In multivariate analysis, patients perceiving PD or expressing uncertainty were found to have significantly higher levels of depression than those with DC (OR 6.42, p = 0.001 and OR 3.86, p = 0.009, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals significant differences in how cancer is perceived by HCPs and patients, particularly among those without disease control or undergoing palliative care. This highlights the importance of effective communication in addressing patients' needs and their psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783256/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05051-0
Lu Yao, Di Wu, Jiefeng Liu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Li Zhang
Objective: To investigate the multiple effects of interactive video health intervention on the quality of life and clinical rehabilitation indexes of patients with early intestinal obstruction.
Methods: This study included two phases: (1) questionnaire validation (January 2019-December 2020): 152 patients with early postoperative bowel obstruction were enrolled to develop and test the reliability/validity of the Postoperative Quality of Life Assessment Scale for Early Intestinal Obstruction. (2) Randomized controlled trial (January 2021-January 2025): 310 eligible patients (18-75 years, basic cognitive ability, diagnosed with early postoperative bowel obstruction after abdominal surgery) were randomly assigned to a control group (conventional care: condition monitoring, basic treatment, and non-structured health education, n = 132) or a study group (conventional care plus an interactive video health intervention-5 modular videos covering disease knowledge, rehabilitation, and diet, initiated 24 h post-surgery, n = 178). Outcomes included QoL (via the validated scale), clinical rehabilitation indicators (obstruction relief time, hospitalization duration), electrogastrogram parameters, and gut microbiota diversity (16S rRNA sequencing).
Results: The validated QoL scale had good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.821-0.937) and validity (AVE > 0.5, CR > 0.7). In the trial, the study group showed significantly better QoL scores (physiological function: 13.82 ± 5.67 vs. 22.45 ± 3.57; total score: 50.60 ± 6.44 vs. 36.67 ± 7.93; P < 0.001) and clinical outcomes (hospitalization duration: 8.78 ± 1.39 vs. 10.13 ± 1.41 days; P < 0.001) than the control group. The study group also had improved electrogastrogram parameters (e.g., gastric antrum slow-wave amplitude: 194.59 ± 20.76 vs. 151.34 ± 21 µV; P < 0.001) and intestinal microbiota evenness (Shannon index: P = 0.0070) compared to the control group.
Conclusion: The disease-specific QoL scale is valid for assessing patients with early postoperative bowel obstruction. The interactive video health intervention effectively improves their QoL and clinical rehabilitation, providing a feasible clinical tool.
{"title":"Multidimensional impact analysis of interactive video health intervention on quality of life and clinical rehabilitation indicators in patients with early postoperative bowel obstruction: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lu Yao, Di Wu, Jiefeng Liu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Li Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-05051-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00384-025-05051-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the multiple effects of interactive video health intervention on the quality of life and clinical rehabilitation indexes of patients with early intestinal obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included two phases: (1) questionnaire validation (January 2019-December 2020): 152 patients with early postoperative bowel obstruction were enrolled to develop and test the reliability/validity of the Postoperative Quality of Life Assessment Scale for Early Intestinal Obstruction. (2) Randomized controlled trial (January 2021-January 2025): 310 eligible patients (18-75 years, basic cognitive ability, diagnosed with early postoperative bowel obstruction after abdominal surgery) were randomly assigned to a control group (conventional care: condition monitoring, basic treatment, and non-structured health education, n = 132) or a study group (conventional care plus an interactive video health intervention-5 modular videos covering disease knowledge, rehabilitation, and diet, initiated 24 h post-surgery, n = 178). Outcomes included QoL (via the validated scale), clinical rehabilitation indicators (obstruction relief time, hospitalization duration), electrogastrogram parameters, and gut microbiota diversity (16S rRNA sequencing).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validated QoL scale had good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.821-0.937) and validity (AVE > 0.5, CR > 0.7). In the trial, the study group showed significantly better QoL scores (physiological function: 13.82 ± 5.67 vs. 22.45 ± 3.57; total score: 50.60 ± 6.44 vs. 36.67 ± 7.93; P < 0.001) and clinical outcomes (hospitalization duration: 8.78 ± 1.39 vs. 10.13 ± 1.41 days; P < 0.001) than the control group. The study group also had improved electrogastrogram parameters (e.g., gastric antrum slow-wave amplitude: 194.59 ± 20.76 vs. 151.34 ± 21 µV; P < 0.001) and intestinal microbiota evenness (Shannon index: P = 0.0070) compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The disease-specific QoL scale is valid for assessing patients with early postoperative bowel obstruction. The interactive video health intervention effectively improves their QoL and clinical rehabilitation, providing a feasible clinical tool.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07258017 (September 24, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"41 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783255/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145933185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}