International Journal of Gynecological Pathology最新文献

Pathogenic variants (mutations) and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies. Many of these neoplasms are characterized by undifferentiated morphology. They arise at a variety of sites in the female genital tract but have rarely been reported in the uterine cervix. We report 2 primary cervical neoplasms arising in young women (ages 28 and 29 yr) exhibiting loss of nuclear immunoreactivity with SMARCB1 (INI1). In one case, which had a mixture of epithelioid and spindle cells, molecular studies revealed no SMARCB1 pathogenic variant, but showed a SPECCL1::NTRK 3 fusion, in keeping with an NTRK fusion sarcoma. The second case exhibited rhabdoid morphology and molecular testing confirmed a SMARCB1 pathogenic variant (c.425 T>G:p.(Leu142Ter) which, interpreted in conjunction with the morphology and immunohistochemistry, resulted in classification as a proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported cervical neoplasm exhibiting a SMARCB1 pathogenic variant and the first NTRK fusion sarcoma showing SMARCB1 protein loss. We discuss the diagnostic challenges and complexities of the molecular findings.

This study investigates the predictive value of biomarkers PTEN, PAX2, and β-catenin for therapeutic outcomes in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing progestin therapy. In a retrospective study of 128 patients, we analyzed a total of 351 endometrial biopsy samples and categorized outcomes into responders (absence of residual disease) and nonresponders (presence of residual disease). We found aberrant biomarker expression in pretreatment cases: 48% for PTEN, 65% for PAX2, and 36% for β-catenin. Approximately 77.3% of patients responded to progestin treatment, with nonresponders showing significantly higher initial PTEN loss (75.86% vs 39.79%, P < 0.001). Nonresponders also demonstrated significant PTEN loss (53.33% vs 20.55%, P < 0.001), PAX2 loss (57.33% vs 41.22%, P < 0.05), and β-catenin nuclear staining (53.45% vs 27.91%, P < 0.01) in follow-up samples. In addition, nonresponders exhibited lower recovery of intact PTEN and PAX2, along with higher β-catenin aberrancy in cases initially showing normal β-catenin levels. We conclude that persistent aberrant PTEN and PAX2 expression, coupled with emerging aberrant β-catenin in follow-ups, indicates a greater likelihood of treatment failure. Conversely, the absence of these aberrations suggests successful progestin therapy. Our findings highlight the utility of this 3-marker panel in assessing residual disease status and predicting progestin treatment outcomes, thus offering critical insights for patient management.

Summary: Our aim was to assess the molecular subtype(s) and perform a detailed morphologic review of tumors diagnosed as carcinosarcoma in a population-based cohort. Forty-one carcinosarcomas were identified from a cohort of 973 endometrial carcinomas diagnosed in 2016. We assessed immunostaining and sequencing data and undertook expert pathology reviews of these cases as well as all subsequently diagnosed (post-2016) carcinosarcomas of no specific molecular profile (NSMP) molecular subtype (n=3) from our institutions. In the 2016 cohort, 37 of the 41 carcinosarcomas (91.2%) were p53abn, 2 (4.9%) were NSMP, and 1 each (2.4%) were POLE mut and mismatch repair deficiency molecular subtypes, respectively. Of the 4 non-p53abn tumors on review, both NSMP tumors were corded and hyalinized (CHEC) pattern endometrioid carcinoma, the mismatch repair deficiency tumor was a grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma with reactive stromal proliferation, and the POLE mut tumor was grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma with spindle cell growth, that is, none were confirmed to be carcinosarcoma on review. We found 11 additional cases among the 37 p53abn tumors that were not confirmed to be carcinosarcoma on the review (3 undifferentiated or dedifferentiated carcinomas, 5 carcinomas with CHEC features, 2 carcinomas showing prominent reactive spindle cell stroma, and 1 adenosarcoma). In the review of institutional cases reported as NSMP carcinosarcoma after 2016, 3 were identified (1 adenosarcoma and 2 mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma on review). In this series, all confirmed endometrial carcinosarcomas were p53abn. The finding of any other molecular subtype in a carcinosarcoma warrants pathology review to exclude mimics.

Among the 4 molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma, the p53 abnormal (copy number high) subgroup has the worst prognosis; however, the histologic characteristics of this subgroup are not well established. Also, it is not well established whether low-grade tumors can belong to the p53 abnormal molecular subgroup and if so, what is the prognostic significance of the p53-mutated molecular subgroup in low-grade tumors. In the current study, we included 146 p53-mutated endometrial carcinomas and performed molecular subgrouping either based on a combination of immunohistochemical studies for p53 and MMR protein expression and POLE mutation testing (81 cases) or based on array-based and sequencing-based technologies (65 cases). We excluded cases that belonged to the POLE mutant or MSI molecular subgroups and only studied p53 abnormal (molecular subgroup) endometrial carcinomas (125 cases). In 71 cases, the molecular subgroup was determined by a combination of immunohistochemical studies and POLE mutation testing, and in 54 cases by array-based and sequencing-based methods. We reviewed 1 to 2 representative digital slides from each case and recorded the morphologic characteristics as well as clinical, treatment, and survival follow-up data. Overall, 47 cases were classified as endometrioid carcinoma, 55 serous carcinoma, and 23 other histotypes. Eight cases were FIGO 1, 21 were FIGO 2, and 91 were FIGO 3. A significant proportion of the cases (24.2%) were histologically classified as low-grade (FIGO 1 or 2) endometrioid carcinoma. There was no morphologic characteristic that showed prognostic implication. There was no significant difference in survival among different histotypes (P=0.60). There was no significant difference in survival among low-grade endometrioid (FIGO 1 or 2) versus high-grade (FIGO 3) tumors (P=0.98). Early-stage (stage I), low-grade tumors showed no significant survival advantage over early-stage, high-grade tumors (P=0.16) and this was more evident in FIGO 2 tumors. Although not statistically significant, the FIGO 2 tumors showed a trend toward worse survival than FIGO 3 tumors. Among the cases with available treatment data, more patients with early-stage high-grade tumors received adjuvant treatment, compared to patients with early-stage low-grade tumors, possibly explaining this trend (P=0.03). In conclusion, the findings of our study suggest that low-grade p53 abnormal endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (especially FIGO 2 tumors) have an aggressive course, with a prognosis similar to high-grade tumors. Furthermore, our study suggests that patients who had early-stage low-grade p53 abnormal disease might have been undertreated because of the "low-grade" histotype.

This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes and risk factors for survival of patients with low-risk early-stage human papillomavirus-associated (HPVA) endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated with surgery alone. This retrospective study obtained the clinicopathological data of patients with early-stage HPVA EAC who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2018. The Silva pattern of invasion was determined by reviewing pathology slides. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (RFS), RFS, and overall survival were calculated, and the risk factors for survival were analyzed. One hundred seventeen patients with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (0.5-9.7 yr) were included. The most common histologic type was usual (94/117, 80.3%). The Silva pattern was A in 79 patients (67.5%), B in 30 (25.6%), and C in 8 (6.8%). The 5-year locoregional RFS, RFS, and overall survival rates were 92.4%, 87.8%, and 97.2%, respectively. The presence of intermediate-risk factors and Silva pattern C were significantly associated with worse survival. Based on these findings, patients were categorized into 2 groups: Group 1 (Silva pattern A or Silva pattern B without intermediate-risk factors) and Group 2 (Silva pattern B with intermediate-risk factors or Silva pattern C ). Group 2 showed significantly worse outcomes than Group 1, including the 5-year locoregional RFS (98.6% vs 68.0%), RFS (96.4% vs 54.6%), and overall survival (100.0% vs 86.5%). In conclusion, surgery alone for early-stage HPVA EAC resulted in favorable outcomes. Consideration of the Silva pattern, in addition to well-known risk factors, could help in precise risk group stratification of low-risk, early-stage HPVA EAC.

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is regarded as the origin of most high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC). After a diagnosis of isolated STIC, risk of developing HGSC is substantial. Since surveillance cannot detect HGSC in time to cure the disease, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment after a diagnosis of isolated STIC, but chemotherapy is considered one of the possible strategies. In this case report, we describe 2 women with advanced-stage HGSC treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. In both women, histopathological examination showed a complete histopathological tumor response, but a vital STIC was found in both cases. The 2 cases presented here indicate that STICs may not respond to chemotherapy. Further research focused on the underlying biology and chemosensitivity of STIC, as well as the effectiveness of treatment to prevent HGSC in case of isolated STIC, is needed.

The International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases (ISSVD) recently defined nonsclerotic lichen sclerosus (NSLS) as a scenario wherein the clinical findings are consistent with lichen sclerosus (LS), but no microscopic evidence of dermal sclerosis is found and recognized 4 histologic subcategories. Herein, we present an institutional experience with NSLS, with an emphasis on frequency, application of the ISSVD categories in routine practice, and clinicopathologic correlation. The authors reviewed clinical and pathologic findings for consecutive vulvar biopsies in which LS was a clinical and/or pathologic consideration. Cases were classified as classical/sclerotic LS (CLS), NSLS (per ISSVD criteria), and "unclassified," the latter of which were cases not classifiable as NSLS or CLS, despite a clinical impression or LS or LS being a significant clinical consideration (ie, "clinical LS"). In clinical LS cases, CLS and NSLS were diagnosed histologically in 61% (182/298) and 15% (44/298), respectively, whereas the remainder were histologically unclassified. The latter group was microscopically heterogeneous, devoid of a consistent pathologic profile, and generally showed absence, focality, minimality, ambiguity, or infrequency of features that would have allowed their categorization into one of the NSLS categories. Among the 4 categories for the categorizable NSLS cases, the "lichenoid dermatitis" pattern (61.4%) was the commonest, followed by dermal fibrosis with acanthosis (22.7%), dermal fibrosis without acanthosis (9.1%), and hypertrophic lichenoid dermatitis (6.8%). The clinical response rates to topical therapies for the NSLS and unclassified groups were 71% and 62%, respectively (P=0.4). Our findings highlight the significance of clinicopathologic correlation in the diagnosis of NSLS. In the setting of clinical LS, some histologic evidence to support that impression is found in most cases when the ISSVD system for diagnosis and classification of biopsies is applied. However, a subset of clinical LS cases are not pathologically classifiable as either CLS or any of the NSLS categories; these display nonspecific histologic features and require future study.

The vulva and perineum are rarely involved by acantholytic dyskeratoses, including Hailey-Hailey disease, Darier disease, papular acantholytic dyskeratosis of the genitocrural area, acantholytic dyskeratotic acanthoma, and warty dyskeratoma. These entities show broad histomorphologic overlap, generally requiring clinical correlation for definitive classification. This institutional series aims to better characterize vulvar acantholytic dyskeratoses and provide a practical literature review and diagnostic aid for gynecologic pathologists. Our institutional archives contained 16 vulvar acantholytic dyskeratoses diagnosed between 1990 and 2023. Affected patients were 36 to 79 (mean, 58) years old and presented with one or more asymptomatic (n = 9) or pruritic (n = 6) lesions involving the vulva (predominantly the labia majora), with additional perineal involvement in 2. Four patients have known Hailey-Hailey disease. Eleven cases comprised singular, raised, erythematous, or skin-colored papules, measuring 0.2 to 0.6 (mean, 0.3) cm. Two patients had oligofocal (both with known Hailey-Hailey disease) vulvar lesions, and 2 had multifocal vulvar lesions (one with known Hailey-Hailey disease). Histologically, all showed acantholysis and dyskeratoses (abundant in 8, focal in 8, with corps ronds generally more conspicuous than corps grains). Additional features included suprabasal clefting (n = 14), dermal papillomatosis (n = 12), and acanthosis (n = 8). Adnexal involvement was rare (n = 1). No histologic features reliably distinguished sporadic versus syndromic acantholytic dyskeratoses. Sporadic lesions were cured by local excision. Patients with Hailey-Hailey disease were variably responsive to corticosteroids. Neither our series nor the literature indicate a significant correlation between sporadic or syndromic acantholytic dyskeratosis and squamous cell carcinoma. Important differential diagnoses include pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus vegetans, for which direct immunofluorescence may be performed, when indicated.