Pub Date : 2025-03-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7629
Adora Chui, Kimia Sedig, Katie N Dainty
Introduction: Following hospitalization, older adults with complex health and social care needs are often deemed to need an "alternate level of care" (ALC) where care needs are misaligned with resources. Coordinated networks can implement integrated care programs for this group in home settings. Understanding the experiences of providers, caregivers, and patients will inform ongoing implementation efforts.
Methods: A qualitative case study was undertaken of North York Community Access to Resources Enabling Support (NYCARES), a novel integrated care program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observational field notes; data were thematically analyzed.
Results: Thirty-six providers, caregivers, and patients were interviewed. Three themes were developed: 1) NYCARES as a lifeline; 2) Experiences tempered by expectations and connection; and 3) The role of integrated care.
Discussion: The NYCARES program was seen as valuable, but implementation posed challenges for each participant group due to varying expectations and perceived degree of connection between patients, families, and providers.
Conclusions: The local coordinated network successfully implemented the NYCARES program for ALC patients despite challenges in stakeholder connections. Similar programs should formally support caregivers and forefront multidirectional communication, particularly between providers in different implementation roles.
{"title":"Provider, Caregiver, and Patient Experiences of an Integrated Care Program for Older Adults Designated as Alternate Level of Care: A Qualitative Case Study.","authors":"Adora Chui, Kimia Sedig, Katie N Dainty","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7629","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.7629","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Following hospitalization, older adults with complex health and social care needs are often deemed to need an \"alternate level of care\" (ALC) where care needs are misaligned with resources. Coordinated networks can implement integrated care programs for this group in home settings. Understanding the experiences of providers, caregivers, and patients will inform ongoing implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative case study was undertaken of North York Community Access to Resources Enabling Support (NYCARES), a novel integrated care program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observational field notes; data were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six providers, caregivers, and patients were interviewed. Three themes were developed: 1) NYCARES as a lifeline; 2) Experiences tempered by expectations and connection; and 3) The role of integrated care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The NYCARES program was seen as valuable, but implementation posed challenges for each participant group due to varying expectations and perceived degree of connection between patients, families, and providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The local coordinated network successfully implemented the NYCARES program for ALC patients despite challenges in stakeholder connections. Similar programs should formally support caregivers and forefront multidirectional communication, particularly between providers in different implementation roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951966/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143752480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8597
Mireia Massot Mesquida, Miquel À Mas, Rosa García-Sierra, Sara Pablo Reyes, Ramón Miralles Basseda, Xavier Vallès, Irene Garcia, Sara Rodoreda, Mar Isnard Blanchart, Maria Josep Ulldemolins, Ricard Peiró Navarro, Susana Morales, Boris Trenado, Yolanda Ordorica, Marta Expósito Izquierdo, Maria José Pérez Lucena, Nemesio Moreno, Montserrat Teixidó Colet, Norma Henríquez, Joaquim Verdaguer Puigvendrelló, Josep Maria Bonet, Núria Prat, Eduard Lozano, Rosa López, Oriol Estrada, Jordi Ara
Introduction: The healthcare response to the COVID-19 pandemic in long term care facilities (LTCF), constitutes one of the challenges faced by governments and institutions worldwide. Our aim was to analyze the facilitators and barriers of this response, for the future integrated care model in these facilities.
Methods: From a retrospective observational study, we present the experience and lessons learned of the implementation of an integrated response at the meso level in LTCF for older people and for people with physical and mental conditions in the North Metropolitan area of Barcelona, in Catalonia, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results: We analyzed the care provided to 13,369 institutionalized people. The major facilitating points were: the adaptation of proactive care teams, the creation of a tool to improve communication with institutions, and the management of epidemiological data for planning collaboration between different actors. Main barriers were not including users and family members views in the response adaptation, and the lack of LTCF resources to respond to changing needs.
Conclusions: Increasing proactivity and adapting interventions based on updated information were key to minimize infections and mortality. Improving the communication and the collaboration between actors, and people involvement in the response planning, need to be considered for the future.
{"title":"What Can We Learn for Future Integrated Care Models in Long Term Care Facilities After the COVID-19 Emergency? Lessons From an Observational Study in Catalonia.","authors":"Mireia Massot Mesquida, Miquel À Mas, Rosa García-Sierra, Sara Pablo Reyes, Ramón Miralles Basseda, Xavier Vallès, Irene Garcia, Sara Rodoreda, Mar Isnard Blanchart, Maria Josep Ulldemolins, Ricard Peiró Navarro, Susana Morales, Boris Trenado, Yolanda Ordorica, Marta Expósito Izquierdo, Maria José Pérez Lucena, Nemesio Moreno, Montserrat Teixidó Colet, Norma Henríquez, Joaquim Verdaguer Puigvendrelló, Josep Maria Bonet, Núria Prat, Eduard Lozano, Rosa López, Oriol Estrada, Jordi Ara","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8597","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The healthcare response to the COVID-19 pandemic in long term care facilities (LTCF), constitutes one of the challenges faced by governments and institutions worldwide. Our aim was to analyze the facilitators and barriers of this response, for the future integrated care model in these facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a retrospective observational study, we present the experience and lessons learned of the implementation of an integrated response at the meso level in LTCF for older people and for people with physical and mental conditions in the North Metropolitan area of Barcelona, in Catalonia, during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed the care provided to 13,369 institutionalized people. The major facilitating points were: the adaptation of proactive care teams, the creation of a tool to improve communication with institutions, and the management of epidemiological data for planning collaboration between different actors. Main barriers were not including users and family members views in the response adaptation, and the lack of LTCF resources to respond to changing needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing proactivity and adapting interventions based on updated information were key to minimize infections and mortality. Improving the communication and the collaboration between actors, and people involvement in the response planning, need to be considered for the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143692121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8644
Lingling Chen, Natalie White, Emma Patten, Danielle Barth, Leanne N Constable, Teresa Hall, Ashraful Kabir, Harriet Hiscock, Sarah Loveday
Introduction: Families experiencing adversity often have complex needs and face barriers to accessing health and social care. This study evaluated the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination (WBC) program to improve access to services. The program combined care navigation and social prescribing within an integrated health and social care Child and Family Hub.
Methods: Mixed-methods design, with data collected through surveys and interviews from: 1) caregivers who participated in the WBC program (n = 11) and those who did not (n = 18), and 2) practitioners working in the Hub (n = 21).
Results: Caregivers and practitioners found the WBC program acceptable and mostly feasible, demonstrating the potential to alleviate caregivers' loneliness and enhance their health, connection to the community, and knowledge and confidence in supporting child and family health and wellbeing.
Discussion: Future WBC program enhancements could include a robust communication strategy to ensure what the program offers is clearly understood by practitioners and caregivers, establishing organisational structures to provide adequate support for the wellbeing coordinator and adopting flexible eligibility criteria.
Conclusion: The WBC program appears acceptable and feasible. Future research should establish program effectiveness with larger and more diverse caregiver samples.
{"title":"Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination Program in an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Lingling Chen, Natalie White, Emma Patten, Danielle Barth, Leanne N Constable, Teresa Hall, Ashraful Kabir, Harriet Hiscock, Sarah Loveday","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8644","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Families experiencing adversity often have complex needs and face barriers to accessing health and social care. This study evaluated the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a Wellbeing Coordination (WBC) program to improve access to services. The program combined care navigation and social prescribing within an integrated health and social care Child and Family Hub.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods design, with data collected through surveys and interviews from: 1) caregivers who participated in the WBC program (<i>n</i> = 11) and those who did not (<i>n</i> = 18), and 2) practitioners working in the Hub (<i>n</i> = 21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers and practitioners found the WBC program acceptable and mostly feasible, demonstrating the potential to alleviate caregivers' loneliness and enhance their health, connection to the community, and knowledge and confidence in supporting child and family health and wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Future WBC program enhancements could include a robust communication strategy to ensure what the program offers is clearly understood by practitioners and caregivers, establishing organisational structures to provide adequate support for the wellbeing coordinator and adopting flexible eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WBC program appears acceptable and feasible. Future research should establish program effectiveness with larger and more diverse caregiver samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843926/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143483004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-11eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8931
Mireia Ferri Sanz, Alejandro Gil-Salmerón, Maite Ferrando, Oscar Zanutto, E L S Bally, Sara Ceron, Demi Cheng
Introduction: Value-based healthcare is a current global trend in health and policy where digital technologies can play an important role to measure what matters to the people. The digitalisation of value-based healthcare is only possible if the care team and people trust in this new concept and the tools provided. In this framework, a participatory co-desing approach was implemented to identify the core elements of an innovative value-based, integrated health and social care delivery model supported by ICT solutions: the VALUECARE model for older people with comorbidities.
Description: The main guiding principles for care delivery have been obtained by means of a literature review. Qualitative data was collected from 369 participants using focus groups and interviews in 6 European countries (Croatia, Ireland, Portugal, Italy, Spain & The Netherlands). The eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model was used as a heuristic tool to integrate the participants' discourses.
Discussion: The VALUECARE model fits with the features for the integrated care practice facilitating the transformation of care delivery addressing the needs of the growing old population and the rapidly development of technologies.
Conclusion: VALUECARE model highlights best practice value-based, integrated care delivery through the application of a set of 6 guiding principles across 7 different core elements.
{"title":"VALUECARE Model for Value-Based, Integrated Health and Social Care Services Delivery Supported by ICT for Older Adults.","authors":"Mireia Ferri Sanz, Alejandro Gil-Salmerón, Maite Ferrando, Oscar Zanutto, E L S Bally, Sara Ceron, Demi Cheng","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8931","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8931","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Value-based healthcare is a current global trend in health and policy where digital technologies can play an important role to measure what matters to the people. The digitalisation of value-based healthcare is only possible if the care team and people trust in this new concept and the tools provided. In this framework, a participatory co-desing approach was implemented to identify the core elements of an innovative value-based, integrated health and social care delivery model supported by ICT solutions: the VALUECARE model for older people with comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The main guiding principles for care delivery have been obtained by means of a literature review. Qualitative data was collected from 369 participants using focus groups and interviews in 6 European countries (Croatia, Ireland, Portugal, Italy, Spain & The Netherlands). The eHealth Enhanced Chronic Care Model was used as a heuristic tool to integrate the participants' discourses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The VALUECARE model fits with the features for the integrated care practice facilitating the transformation of care delivery addressing the needs of the growing old population and the rapidly development of technologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VALUECARE model highlights best practice value-based, integrated care delivery through the application of a set of 6 guiding principles across 7 different core elements.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827563/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143433192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.9050
Coralie Darcis
This thesis explored the issue of coordination in the Belgian mental health sector, focusing on "network coordinators" introduced through public policies setting up local networks to counter fragmentation. Using a qualitative and ethnographic methodology, the author examined the work of these new professionals from four perspectives: instruments, practices, knowledge and experience. Describing the contours of a promising but unachievable mandate, this thesis explained the disillusionment that they experience. Finally, it took a critical look at these coordination initiatives by showing the rareness of the "successful coordinator" and highlighting the limits of the network model as it is currently conceived.
{"title":"Keeping the Myth Alive: Network Coordinators Facing the Challenges of Public Action in the Belgian Mental Health Sector.","authors":"Coralie Darcis","doi":"10.5334/ijic.9050","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.9050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This thesis explored the issue of coordination in the Belgian mental health sector, focusing on \"network coordinators\" introduced through public policies setting up local networks to counter fragmentation. Using a qualitative and ethnographic methodology, the author examined the work of these new professionals from four perspectives: <i>instruments, practices, knowledge</i> and <i>experience</i>. Describing the contours of a promising but unachievable mandate, this thesis explained the <i>disillusionment</i> that they experience. Finally, it took a critical look at these coordination initiatives by showing the rareness of the \"successful coordinator\" and highlighting the limits of the <i>network model</i> as it is currently conceived.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8842
Andrée Sekreve, Maurits Struik, Woody van Olffen, Laura Nooteboom
Introduction: Integrated care is crucial in delivering coherent and coordinated support to families with multiple and complex problems. Reorienting care organisations towards integrated care is a complex organisational change process. It requires both structural and behavioural adjustments. To learn about effective practice, it is useful to study implementation between contexts.
Description: This mixed methods case study provides a comparison over time of five regional teams simultaneously implementing an integrated care delivery mode. Group interviews identified whether and how different elements in the change approach helped or hindered the change progress.
Discussion: We describe and discuss how the teams were guided and supported in learning to make the behavioural switches associated with their new integrated mode of operation.
Conclusion: Our support-interventions appeared to be largely successful in fostering four pre-defined integrated care behaviours. This research took place during the Covid-19 pandemic, which was challenging but also brought unexpected benefits.
{"title":"Fostering Behavioural Change Towards Integrated Care - a Multi-Team Case Study in Specialised Youth Services.","authors":"Andrée Sekreve, Maurits Struik, Woody van Olffen, Laura Nooteboom","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8842","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8842","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integrated care is crucial in delivering coherent and coordinated support to families with multiple and complex problems. Reorienting care organisations towards integrated care is a complex organisational change process. It requires both structural and behavioural adjustments. To learn about effective practice, it is useful to study implementation between contexts.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>This mixed methods case study provides a comparison over time of five regional teams simultaneously implementing an integrated care delivery mode. Group interviews identified whether and how different elements in the change approach helped or hindered the change progress.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We describe and discuss how the teams were guided and supported in learning to make the behavioural switches associated with their new integrated mode of operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our support-interventions appeared to be largely successful in fostering four pre-defined integrated care behaviours. This research took place during the Covid-19 pandemic, which was challenging but also brought unexpected benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143382339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Integrated care poses a significant challenge for healthcare policies in Japan as evaluation of hospital discharge services is limited. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of discharge services for elderly acute-care patients on preventing rehospitalisation.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using national health data from Kita Ward, Tokyo. Survival analysis was performed with a Cox proportional hazards model, with readmission hazard ratios (HRs) as the primary endpoint. Subgroup analysis examined interactions between each discharge service category (dummy variable) and readmission.
Results: The study encompassed 6,681 subjects. The Cox model adjusted for age, gender, and complications revealed increased readmission events in the discharge service group (HR = 2.92, 95% CI 2.60-3.27). Subgroup analysis by age and length of hospital stay identified a preventive effect in the 85-year-old group (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.93) and 15-21-day length of stay group (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01), suggesting that discharge services may inadvertently lower barriers to readmission due to healthcare system influences.
Conclusion: While discharge services may elevate readmission demand, they appear to have a preventive effect for individuals aged 85 and over or with an average length of stay of 15-21 days.
导言:综合护理对日本的医疗保健政策提出了重大挑战,因为对出院服务的评估有限。本研究旨在探讨老年急症病人出院服务对预防再住院的影响。方法:采用东京北区的全国健康数据进行回顾性队列研究。生存分析采用Cox比例风险模型,以再入院风险比(hr)为主要终点。亚组分析检查了每个出院服务类别(虚拟变量)与再入院之间的相互作用。结果:研究共纳入6681名受试者。经年龄、性别和并发症调整后的Cox模型显示,出院服务组再入院事件增加(HR = 2.92, 95% CI 2.60-3.27)。按年龄和住院时间长短进行的亚组分析发现,85岁组(HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.93)和15-21天住院时间组(HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01)具有预防作用,表明由于医疗系统的影响,出院服务可能无意中降低了再入院的障碍。结论:虽然出院服务可能会增加再入院需求,但对于85岁及以上或平均住院时间为15-21天的患者,出院服务似乎具有预防作用。
{"title":"Impact of Elderly Acute Care Discharge Services on Prevention of Rehospitalisation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using National Health Data from Kita Ward, Tokyo.","authors":"Masumi Takei, Satoshi Miyata, Mariko Inoue, Kenzo Takahashi","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8913","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integrated care poses a significant challenge for healthcare policies in Japan as evaluation of hospital discharge services is limited. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of discharge services for elderly acute-care patients on preventing rehospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using national health data from Kita Ward, Tokyo. Survival analysis was performed with a Cox proportional hazards model, with readmission hazard ratios (HRs) as the primary endpoint. Subgroup analysis examined interactions between each discharge service category (dummy variable) and readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study encompassed 6,681 subjects. The Cox model adjusted for age, gender, and complications revealed increased readmission events in the discharge service group (HR = 2.92, 95% CI 2.60-3.27). Subgroup analysis by age and length of hospital stay identified a preventive effect in the 85-year-old group (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.93) and 15-21-day length of stay group (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01), suggesting that discharge services may inadvertently lower barriers to readmission due to healthcare system influences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While discharge services may elevate readmission demand, they appear to have a preventive effect for individuals aged 85 and over or with an average length of stay of 15-21 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143382343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8577
Eskil Degsell, Lina Al-Adili, Petter Gustavsson, Mats Brommels, Petra Dannapfel
Introduction: Addressing challenges due to demographic changes and the quest for improved value in healthcare requires an extended integrated approach to care that fosters collaboration between all stakeholders, especially within collaboration supporting cognitively impaired patients. The aim is to review existing studies on interventions to improve communication and collaboration between such patients, their caregivers and healthcare staff.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched electronic databases Medline (OVID), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Web of Science (Clarivate) for peer-reviewed literature [2010-2020] focusing on intervention studies. Papers were excluded if not assessing the impact of interventions or only presenting a study protocol.
Results: Twelve studies explored diverse approaches to social support, all with the aim of improving communication and collaboration among stakeholders, and identified three intervention types: supporting empowerment, promoting collaborative disease management, and coping, and enhancing communication and relationships.
Discussion: The interventions employed various approaches and assessed a range of outcomes, demonstrating the benefits of enhancing communication and collaboration among stakeholders. Yet only a few studies included the full triad of partners in care.
Conclusion: There is still much to be done to achieve the extended integration of care services and support that will benefit from patient and caregiver involvement.
导论:应对人口变化带来的挑战和寻求医疗保健的改进价值需要一种扩展的综合方法来促进所有利益相关者之间的协作,特别是在支持认知障碍患者的协作中。目的是审查现有的干预研究,以改善这类患者、其护理人员和医护人员之间的沟通和协作。方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们系统地检索了Medline (OVID)、CINAHL (Ebsco)和Web of Science (Clarivate)电子数据库,检索了同行评议的文献[2010-2020],重点是干预研究。未评估干预措施的影响或仅提出研究方案的论文被排除。结果:12项研究探索了不同的社会支持方法,所有这些方法都旨在改善利益相关者之间的沟通和协作,并确定了三种干预类型:支持授权,促进协作疾病管理和应对,以及加强沟通和关系。讨论:干预措施采用了各种方法并评估了一系列结果,展示了加强利益攸关方之间沟通与合作的好处。然而,只有少数研究包括了护理伙伴的全部三位一体。结论:要实现护理服务和支持的扩展整合,将受益于患者和护理人员的参与,还有很多工作要做。
{"title":"Extending Integration: Interventions Supporting Communication and Collaboration Between Patients with Neurological Diseases, Their Informal Caregivers and Healthcare Staff - a Scoping Review.","authors":"Eskil Degsell, Lina Al-Adili, Petter Gustavsson, Mats Brommels, Petra Dannapfel","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8577","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing challenges due to demographic changes and the quest for improved value in healthcare requires an extended integrated approach to care that fosters collaboration between all stakeholders, especially within collaboration supporting cognitively impaired patients. The aim is to review existing studies on interventions to improve communication and collaboration between such patients, their caregivers and healthcare staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched electronic databases Medline (OVID), CINAHL (Ebsco), and Web of Science (Clarivate) for peer-reviewed literature [2010-2020] focusing on intervention studies. Papers were excluded if not assessing the impact of interventions or only presenting a study protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies explored diverse approaches to social support, all with the aim of improving communication and collaboration among stakeholders, and identified three intervention types: <i>supporting empowerment, promoting collaborative disease management, and coping</i>, and <i>enhancing communication and relationships</i>.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The interventions employed various approaches and assessed a range of outcomes, demonstrating the benefits of enhancing communication and collaboration among stakeholders. Yet only a few studies included the full triad of partners in care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is still much to be done to achieve the extended integration of care services and support that will benefit from patient and caregiver involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143079852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-24eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8645
Anne C M Hermans, Silke Boertien, Lauri M M van den Berg, Ank de Jonge, Danielle E M C Janssen, Arie Franx, Jacoba van der Kooy, Marlou L A de Kroon
Introduction: While the World Health Organization (WHO) advocates organizing maternity care and preventive child healthcare (PCHC) as people-centred, integrated healthcare services, globally these services are often established separately, causing discontinuity of care. Our aim is to synthesize the evidence concerning what impacts parents' experience of continuity of care, and how to promote it.
Methods: Qualitative systematic review. Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL and Google Scholar were searched for studies on parents' perspectives on integrated care. Helpful practices and issues regarding continuity of care were identified.
Results: We found that parents valued easily accessible, tailored, family-centred care that is a display of interprofessional collaboration and is geared towards supporting and empowering parents.
Discussion: Study strengths are its qualitative nature, allowing for in-depth patient views and experiences, and the multidisciplinary research team, which ensured a multidimensional view of the issue.
Conclusion: Ideally, (a) parents enter the postnatal period well-prepared, and well-informed about self-care, PCHC and possible postnatal carepathways, (b) number of caretransfers is limited, (c) by overlapping maternity care and PCHC, parents are provided with an opportunity to maintain meaningful relationships with their care providers, and (d) information is consistent, family-centred, and tailored.
导言:虽然世界卫生组织(世卫组织)提倡将产妇保健和预防性儿童保健(PCHC)作为以人为本的综合保健服务组织起来,但在全球范围内,这些服务往往是单独建立的,造成护理的不连续性。我们的目的是综合的证据,是什么影响父母的经验的连续性护理,以及如何促进它。方法:定性系统评价。检索了Embase、Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar关于家长对综合护理的看法的研究。确定了有关护理连续性的有益做法和问题。结果:我们发现,家长重视易于获得的、量身定制的、以家庭为中心的护理,这是一种跨专业合作的展示,旨在为父母提供支持和授权。讨论:研究的优势在于其定性性质,允许深入的患者观点和经验,以及多学科研究团队,这确保了问题的多维视图。结论:理想情况下,(a)父母在产后做好充分准备,并充分了解自我护理、PCHC和可能的产后护理途径,(b)护理转移的数量有限,(c)通过重叠的产科护理和PCHC,父母有机会与护理提供者保持有意义的关系,(d)信息是一致的,以家庭为中心的,量身定制的。
{"title":"Parent's Perspective on Continuity of Care in the Maternity Care and Child Health Services Continuum: A Qualitative Systematic Review.","authors":"Anne C M Hermans, Silke Boertien, Lauri M M van den Berg, Ank de Jonge, Danielle E M C Janssen, Arie Franx, Jacoba van der Kooy, Marlou L A de Kroon","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8645","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While the World Health Organization (WHO) advocates organizing maternity care and preventive child healthcare (PCHC) as people-centred, integrated healthcare services, globally these services are often established separately, causing discontinuity of care. Our aim is to synthesize the evidence concerning what impacts parents' experience of continuity of care, and how to promote it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative systematic review. Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL and Google Scholar were searched for studies on parents' perspectives on integrated care. Helpful practices and issues regarding continuity of care were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that parents valued easily accessible, tailored, family-centred care that is a display of interprofessional collaboration and is geared towards supporting and empowering parents.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Study strengths are its qualitative nature, allowing for in-depth patient views and experiences, and the multidisciplinary research team, which ensured a multidimensional view of the issue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ideally, (a) parents enter the postnatal period well-prepared, and well-informed about self-care, PCHC and possible postnatal carepathways, (b) number of caretransfers is limited, (c) by overlapping maternity care and PCHC, parents are provided with an opportunity to maintain meaningful relationships with their care providers, and (d) information is consistent, family-centred, and tailored.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758814/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143046596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-23eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8623
Lucia Ferrara, Vittoria Ardito, Valeria D Tozzi, Rosanna Tarricone
Introduction: Multimorbid patients have been growing, leading to an exponential increase in healthcare costs and patterns of resource utilization. Despite the heightened interest toward integrated care programs as a response to the complex need of multimorbid patients, economic evaluations of these programs remain scarce. This work investigated the economic evaluations of service interventions targeting multimorbid patients, to identify the characteristics of these programs and the methods applied to their evaluation.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review of papers published between 2010 and 2021 on PubMed, Science Direct, EconLit and Web Of Science. The search strategy was built around three keyword blocks: service interventions, multimorbidity, economic evaluations. We selected economic evaluations of service interventions delivered through multiple care settings and targeting patients with 2+ chronic conditions.
Results: Twenty-five articles were included. Interventions were categorized as organizational-type versus patient-oriented. The selected studies often targeted patients with one chronic disease, associated with a mental disorder, like depression or anxiety. Included studies were mostly cost-utility analyses conducted with the healthcare perspective.
Discussions and conclusions: This work confirmed that economic evaluations of service interventions for multimorbid patients are limited in number. This could suggest that decision-making regarding the delivery of healthcare services for multimorbid patients may not always be based on a solid evidence base. More economic analyses are needed to inform evidence-based coverage decision-making.
简介:多病患者不断增加,导致医疗保健费用和资源利用模式呈指数级增长。尽管人们对综合护理项目的兴趣越来越高,因为它可以满足多种疾病患者的复杂需求,但对这些项目的经济评估仍然很少。这项工作调查了针对多病患者的服务干预的经济评估,以确定这些项目的特点和应用于评估的方法。方法:我们对2010年至2021年间发表在PubMed、Science Direct、EconLit和Web of Science上的论文进行了范围综述。搜索策略围绕三个关键字块构建:服务干预、多病态、经济评估。我们选择了通过多种护理环境提供的服务干预的经济评估,并针对患有2种以上慢性疾病的患者。结果:共纳入25篇文章。干预措施分为组织型和患者型两类。选定的研究通常针对患有一种慢性疾病的患者,这种疾病与精神障碍有关,如抑郁症或焦虑症。纳入的研究大多是从医疗保健角度进行的成本效用分析。讨论和结论:这项工作证实了对多病患者服务干预的经济评估数量有限。这可能表明,为多病患者提供医疗保健服务的决策可能并不总是基于可靠的证据基础。需要更多的经济分析来为基于证据的覆盖决策提供信息。
{"title":"Economic Evaluations of Health Service Interventions Targeting Patients with Multimorbidities: A Scoping Literature Review.","authors":"Lucia Ferrara, Vittoria Ardito, Valeria D Tozzi, Rosanna Tarricone","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8623","DOIUrl":"10.5334/ijic.8623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multimorbid patients have been growing, leading to an exponential increase in healthcare costs and patterns of resource utilization. Despite the heightened interest toward integrated care programs as a response to the complex need of multimorbid patients, economic evaluations of these programs remain scarce. This work investigated the economic evaluations of service interventions targeting multimorbid patients, to identify the characteristics of these programs and the methods applied to their evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of papers published between 2010 and 2021 on PubMed, Science Direct, EconLit and Web Of Science. The search strategy was built around three keyword blocks: service interventions, multimorbidity, economic evaluations. We selected economic evaluations of service interventions delivered through multiple care settings and targeting patients with 2+ chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles were included. Interventions were categorized as organizational-type versus patient-oriented. The selected studies often targeted patients with one chronic disease, associated with a mental disorder, like depression or anxiety. Included studies were mostly cost-utility analyses conducted with the healthcare perspective.</p><p><strong>Discussions and conclusions: </strong>This work confirmed that economic evaluations of service interventions for multimorbid patients are limited in number. This could suggest that decision-making regarding the delivery of healthcare services for multimorbid patients may not always be based on a solid evidence base. More economic analyses are needed to inform evidence-based coverage decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760752/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143046595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}