首页 > 最新文献

International Urology and Nephrology最新文献

英文 中文
Evidence-based recommendations for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones. 预防尿路结石患者复发的循证建议。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-026-05036-0
Yucen Jiang, Minfeng Hua, Ying Jiang, Yuanting Zhou, Yan Chen

Objective: To evaluate and summarize evidence related to preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing guidance for clinical healthcare professionals in managing recurrence prevention.

Methods: Literature on recurrence prevention in patients with urinary tract stones was systematically retrieved from domestic and international databases using the "6S" model, followed by quality assessment, evidence extraction, and synthesis.

Results: A total of 14 studies were included, comprising 2 guidelines, 4 systematic reviews, 3 meta-analyses, 2 expert consensus documents, 2 evidence summaries, and 1 clinical decision aid. Sixteen best evidence recommendations were identified across personnel training, assessment, nutrition, medication, and follow-up.

Conclusion: This evidence-based review summarizes the best available evidence for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical healthcare providers.

目的:评价和总结预防尿路结石患者复发的相关证据,为临床医护人员预防尿路结石复发提供指导。方法:采用“6S”模型系统检索国内外有关尿路结石患者预防复发的文献,进行质量评价、证据提取、综合。结果:共纳入14项研究,包括2项指南、4项系统综述、3项荟萃分析、2项专家共识文件、2项证据摘要和1项临床决策辅助。在人员培训、评估、营养、药物和随访方面确定了16项最佳证据建议。结论:本循证综述总结了预防尿路结石患者复发的最佳证据,为临床医护人员提供循证指导。
{"title":"Evidence-based recommendations for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones.","authors":"Yucen Jiang, Minfeng Hua, Ying Jiang, Yuanting Zhou, Yan Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11255-026-05036-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-026-05036-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and summarize evidence related to preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing guidance for clinical healthcare professionals in managing recurrence prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature on recurrence prevention in patients with urinary tract stones was systematically retrieved from domestic and international databases using the \"6S\" model, followed by quality assessment, evidence extraction, and synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies were included, comprising 2 guidelines, 4 systematic reviews, 3 meta-analyses, 2 expert consensus documents, 2 evidence summaries, and 1 clinical decision aid. Sixteen best evidence recommendations were identified across personnel training, assessment, nutrition, medication, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evidence-based review summarizes the best available evidence for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking base excess in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: reverse causation, misclassification, and methodological oversight. 重新思考败血症相关急性肾损伤中碱过量:反向因果关系、错误分类和方法学上的疏忽。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04705-w
Karan Chaman Lal, Kainat Kousar
{"title":"Rethinking base excess in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: reverse causation, misclassification, and methodological oversight.","authors":"Karan Chaman Lal, Kainat Kousar","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04705-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04705-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"719-720"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144789084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Repurposing hemodialysis reject water as a sustainable irrigation solution for football pitches. 重新利用血液透析废水作为足球场的可持续灌溉解决方案。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04656-2
Faissal Tarrass, Meryem Benjelloun
{"title":"Repurposing hemodialysis reject water as a sustainable irrigation solution for football pitches.","authors":"Faissal Tarrass, Meryem Benjelloun","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04656-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04656-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"713-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144784309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reclassification of chronic kidney disease in the elderly: emphasizing the need for longitudinal outcome validation. 老年人慢性肾脏疾病的重新分类:强调纵向结果验证的必要性。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04740-7
Muhammad Umer Suleman, Muhammad Mursaleen, Umer Khalil
{"title":"Reclassification of chronic kidney disease in the elderly: emphasizing the need for longitudinal outcome validation.","authors":"Muhammad Umer Suleman, Muhammad Mursaleen, Umer Khalil","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04740-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04740-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"729-730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144862172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconsidering bioelectrical impedance analysis in intradialytic hypotension risk prediction. 重新考虑生物电阻抗分析在分析性低血压风险预测中的应用。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04715-8
Muhammad Umer Suleman, Muhammad Mursaleen, Umer Khalil
{"title":"Reconsidering bioelectrical impedance analysis in intradialytic hypotension risk prediction.","authors":"Muhammad Umer Suleman, Muhammad Mursaleen, Umer Khalil","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04715-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04715-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"733-734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Methodological caveats in intradialytic hypotension prediction: BIA variability, low AUCs, and definition heterogeneity. 分析性低血压预测的方法学注意事项:BIA可变性、低auc和定义异质性。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04743-4
Karan Chaman Lal, Ayesha Ubaid Ullah, Syeda Zainab Kazmi, Mishal Iqbal, Manisha Chamanlal
{"title":"Methodological caveats in intradialytic hypotension prediction: BIA variability, low AUCs, and definition heterogeneity.","authors":"Karan Chaman Lal, Ayesha Ubaid Ullah, Syeda Zainab Kazmi, Mishal Iqbal, Manisha Chamanlal","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04743-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04743-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"735-736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reassessing CKD staging in the elderly: methodological and clinical concerns. 重新评估老年人CKD分期:方法学和临床问题。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04731-8
Bhoomeeka Jayramdass, Manohar Lal
{"title":"Reassessing CKD staging in the elderly: methodological and clinical concerns.","authors":"Bhoomeeka Jayramdass, Manohar Lal","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04731-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04731-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"725-726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144835072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles. 经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术:无结石率和并发症概况的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8
Zunaira Naeem, Pakeezah Tabasum, Manahil Mustajab, Ahsan Abid, Muhammad Athar Khawaja, Hussain Ramzan, Yasmeen Sufi, Muhammad Talha, Nabeeha Noor, Imran Saeed, Muhammad Usman Hashmi
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nephrolithiasis is a highly prevalent urological condition, necessitating effective and minimally invasive treatment strategies. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are commonly employed for managing renal calculi, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence, providing a comprehensive assessment of surgical outcomes between PCNL and RIRS for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, reported across different study designs, various surgical techniques, and different geographical distributions to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov, up to December 2024. Risk of Bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool for RCTs. Data extraction focused on key outcomes such as stone-free rate, complications, operation time, hospital stay, and the need for blood transfusions. Statistical analysis utilized a random-effects model to pool data, with heterogeneity assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and publication bias evaluated via funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of 62 studies (25 were RCTs and 37 were cohorts) with 7021 patients revealed a significantly higher stone-free rate in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.09], p < 0.00001), indicating greater efficacy in stone clearance. However, PCNL was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (RR: 1.49, 95% CI [1.25, 1.77], p < 0.00001) and a greater need for blood transfusions (RR: 3.20, 95% CI [1.70, 6.03], p = 0.0003), associated with increased risk. Post-operative hematuria was marginally higher in the PCNL group (RR: 2.06, 95% CI [1.01, 4.19], p = 0.05). Among the PCNL techniques, all PCNL techniques showed significantly higher Hb drop; micro-PCNL was associated with the smallest hemoglobin drop relative to RIRS (MD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86), followed by mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL. Operation times were comparable between the two procedures, but PCNL resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay (MD: 1.73, 95% CI [1.35, 2.10], p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCNL demonstrates a superior stone-free rate for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, but this is accompanied by a higher risk of complications and a longer hospital stay compared to RIRS. RIRS offers a safer alternative with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, making it a viable option for at-risk patients. The use of miniaturized PCNL techniques appears to mitigate some of the complication risks associated with traditional PCNL, potentially offering a balance between efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making
背景:肾结石是一种非常普遍的泌尿系统疾病,需要有效的微创治疗策略。经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)是治疗肾结石的常用方法,但其相对疗效和安全性仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在综合现有证据,全面评估PCNL和RIRS治疗2 cm以下和2 cm以上肾结石的手术结果,这些结果来自不同的研究设计、不同的手术技术和不同的地理分布,以指导临床决策。方法:系统检索截至2024年12月的PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane和Clinicaltrials.gov等电子数据库的文献。对非随机队列研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行偏倚风险评估,对随机对照试验采用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0 (RoB 2.0)工具。数据提取侧重于关键结果,如无结石率、并发症、手术时间、住院时间和输血需求。统计分析采用随机效应模型汇集数据,采用I2统计量评估异质性,通过漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:对62项研究(25项为随机对照试验,37项为队列研究)7021例患者的分析显示,与RIRS相比,PCNL组的结石无结石率显著高于RIRS (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.09], p结论:PCNL对2厘米以下和大于2厘米的肾结石有更高的结石无结石率,但与RIRS相比,这伴随着更高的并发症风险和更长的住院时间。RIRS提供了一种更安全的替代方案,并发症更少,住院时间更短,使其成为高危患者的可行选择。小型化PCNL技术的使用似乎减轻了传统PCNL相关的一些并发症风险,在疗效和安全性之间提供了潜在的平衡。临床决策应个性化,考虑患者和结石的特点,外科医生的经验,以及先进的PCNL技术的可用性。
{"title":"Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles.","authors":"Zunaira Naeem, Pakeezah Tabasum, Manahil Mustajab, Ahsan Abid, Muhammad Athar Khawaja, Hussain Ramzan, Yasmeen Sufi, Muhammad Talha, Nabeeha Noor, Imran Saeed, Muhammad Usman Hashmi","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Nephrolithiasis is a highly prevalent urological condition, necessitating effective and minimally invasive treatment strategies. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are commonly employed for managing renal calculi, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence, providing a comprehensive assessment of surgical outcomes between PCNL and RIRS for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, reported across different study designs, various surgical techniques, and different geographical distributions to guide clinical decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A systematic literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov, up to December 2024. Risk of Bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool for RCTs. Data extraction focused on key outcomes such as stone-free rate, complications, operation time, hospital stay, and the need for blood transfusions. Statistical analysis utilized a random-effects model to pool data, with heterogeneity assessed using the I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; statistic and publication bias evaluated via funnel plots.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The analysis of 62 studies (25 were RCTs and 37 were cohorts) with 7021 patients revealed a significantly higher stone-free rate in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.09], p &lt; 0.00001), indicating greater efficacy in stone clearance. However, PCNL was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (RR: 1.49, 95% CI [1.25, 1.77], p &lt; 0.00001) and a greater need for blood transfusions (RR: 3.20, 95% CI [1.70, 6.03], p = 0.0003), associated with increased risk. Post-operative hematuria was marginally higher in the PCNL group (RR: 2.06, 95% CI [1.01, 4.19], p = 0.05). Among the PCNL techniques, all PCNL techniques showed significantly higher Hb drop; micro-PCNL was associated with the smallest hemoglobin drop relative to RIRS (MD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86), followed by mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL. Operation times were comparable between the two procedures, but PCNL resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay (MD: 1.73, 95% CI [1.35, 2.10], p &lt; 0.00001).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;PCNL demonstrates a superior stone-free rate for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, but this is accompanied by a higher risk of complications and a longer hospital stay compared to RIRS. RIRS offers a safer alternative with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, making it a viable option for at-risk patients. The use of miniaturized PCNL techniques appears to mitigate some of the complication risks associated with traditional PCNL, potentially offering a balance between efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"407-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144789083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy. 评估局部前列腺癌的微创策略:高强度聚焦超声与根治性前列腺切除术的比较荟萃分析。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9
Henrique L Lepine, Fabio C Vicentini, Christiano Machado Filho, Guilherme Cavalcante, Fernanda M Llata, José Bessa Júnior, Leonardo O Reis, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho, Caio Vinícius Suartz

Purpose: Prostate cancer is frequently managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), which can offer excellent oncological control but with significant genitourinary morbidity. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncological, functional, and safety outcomes of HIFU versus RP in men with localized prostate cancer.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane through December 2024 for comparative studies of HIFU and RP. Fourteen studies (including two randomized trials) met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was salvage therapy-free survival (STFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, functional outcomes, and complications. Random-effect models were applied, and meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.

Results: Overall, HIFU was associated with lower STFS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02) although biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments. Focal HIFU showed fewer major complications (OR: 0.36) and significantly better erectile function preservation (OR: 6.03), but minor complications were slightly more frequent. High heterogeneity was partly explained by study design and follow-up duration. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, variable definitions of outcomes, and relatively short follow-ups in some studies.

Conclusion: For selected patients, biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments although HIFU was associated with lower STFS. Particularly as focal therapy, it shows the potential to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to radical prostatectomy while enhancing erectile function preservation, urinary continence, and reducing major complications. Further long-term prospective studies are warranted to solidify these findings.

目的:前列腺癌通常采用根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗,它可以提供良好的肿瘤控制,但有显著的泌尿生殖系统发病率。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已成为一种侵入性较小的替代方法。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较HIFU和RP治疗局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学、功能和安全性结果。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们检索了Medline, Embase和Cochrane,直到2024年12月进行HIFU和RP的比较研究。14项研究(包括2项随机试验)符合纳入标准。主要终点是挽救性无治疗生存期(STFS)。次要结局包括生化复发、无转移生存、功能结局和并发症。采用随机效应模型,meta回归探讨异质性的来源。结果:总体而言,HIFU与较低的STFS相关(优势比[OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02),尽管不同治疗间生化复发和无转移生存没有显著差异。局灶HIFU的主要并发症较少(OR: 0.36),勃起功能保存明显较好(OR: 6.03),但轻微并发症发生率略高。高异质性的部分原因是研究设计和随访时间。局限性包括实质性的异质性,结果的可变定义,以及一些研究的随访时间相对较短。结论:对于选定的患者,尽管HIFU与较低的STFS相关,但不同治疗之间的生化复发和无转移生存无显著差异。特别是作为局灶性治疗,它显示出实现与根治性前列腺切除术相当的肿瘤结果的潜力,同时增强了勃起功能的保留,尿失禁,并减少了主要并发症。需要进一步的长期前瞻性研究来巩固这些发现。
{"title":"Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Henrique L Lepine, Fabio C Vicentini, Christiano Machado Filho, Guilherme Cavalcante, Fernanda M Llata, José Bessa Júnior, Leonardo O Reis, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho, Caio Vinícius Suartz","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer is frequently managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), which can offer excellent oncological control but with significant genitourinary morbidity. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncological, functional, and safety outcomes of HIFU versus RP in men with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane through December 2024 for comparative studies of HIFU and RP. Fourteen studies (including two randomized trials) met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was salvage therapy-free survival (STFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, functional outcomes, and complications. Random-effect models were applied, and meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, HIFU was associated with lower STFS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02) although biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments. Focal HIFU showed fewer major complications (OR: 0.36) and significantly better erectile function preservation (OR: 6.03), but minor complications were slightly more frequent. High heterogeneity was partly explained by study design and follow-up duration. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, variable definitions of outcomes, and relatively short follow-ups in some studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For selected patients, biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments although HIFU was associated with lower STFS. Particularly as focal therapy, it shows the potential to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to radical prostatectomy while enhancing erectile function preservation, urinary continence, and reducing major complications. Further long-term prospective studies are warranted to solidify these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"391-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144760004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing complications of Rezum and Urolift for BPH/LUTS using the Accordion Severity Grading System. 用Accordion严重程度分级系统比较Rezum和Urolift治疗BPH/LUTS的并发症。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04704-x
Kevin McVary, Bronwyn Long, Amandip Cheema, Larry E Miller

Purpose: To compare the short- and long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift using standardized approaches.

Methods: We analyzed published data from the pivotal randomized trials of Rezum and Urolift. The severity of complications was independently graded by urologists using the Accordion Severity Grading System, developed by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Short- (3 months) and long-term (5 years) complication rates were assessed. Long-term complications included medical retreatment, surgical retreatment, and surgical implant removal. We calculated the weighted postoperative morbidity index (PMI) values (0-1 scale) for each procedure and performed Monte Carlo simulations to account for uncertainty in complication rates and severities.

Results: Short-term PMI values were similar between the Rezum (0.091) and Urolift (0.092) groups, with dysuria, hematuria, pain, and urinary urgency most commonly reported. Over 5 years, the cumulative complication rates were 15.4% for Rezum and 33.6% for Urolift. The associated 5-year PMI was 0.055 for Rezum and 0.165 for Urolift, indicating a three-fold higher long-term severity-weighted complication burden with Urolift. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the robustness of these findings.

Conclusions: This study identified significant differences in the long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift when considering both the incidence and severity of postoperative complications. These findings may help guide clinical decision-making when selecting minimally invasive surgical options for BPH/LUTS treatment.

目的:比较标准化入路Rezum和Urolift的短期和长期并发症。方法:我们分析了Rezum和Urolift关键性随机试验的已发表数据。并发症的严重程度由泌尿科医生使用Accordion严重程度分级系统独立分级,该系统由美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划开发。评估短期(3个月)和长期(5年)并发症发生率。长期并发症包括药物再治疗、手术再治疗和手术植入物移除。我们计算了每个手术的加权术后发病率指数(PMI)值(0-1级),并进行了蒙特卡罗模拟,以考虑并发症发生率和严重程度的不确定性。结果:短期PMI值在Rezum组(0.091)和Urolift组(0.092)之间相似,最常见的是排尿困难、血尿、疼痛和尿急。5年内,Rezum和Urolift的累计并发症发生率分别为15.4%和33.6%。Rezum的相关5年PMI为0.055,Urolift的相关5年PMI为0.165,表明Urolift的长期严重加权并发症负担高出3倍。蒙特卡罗模拟证实了这些发现的稳健性。结论:本研究发现,在考虑术后并发症的发生率和严重程度时,Rezum和Urolift的长期并发症情况存在显著差异。这些发现可能有助于指导临床决策选择微创手术治疗BPH/LUTS。
{"title":"Comparing complications of Rezum and Urolift for BPH/LUTS using the Accordion Severity Grading System.","authors":"Kevin McVary, Bronwyn Long, Amandip Cheema, Larry E Miller","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04704-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04704-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short- and long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift using standardized approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed published data from the pivotal randomized trials of Rezum and Urolift. The severity of complications was independently graded by urologists using the Accordion Severity Grading System, developed by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Short- (3 months) and long-term (5 years) complication rates were assessed. Long-term complications included medical retreatment, surgical retreatment, and surgical implant removal. We calculated the weighted postoperative morbidity index (PMI) values (0-1 scale) for each procedure and performed Monte Carlo simulations to account for uncertainty in complication rates and severities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short-term PMI values were similar between the Rezum (0.091) and Urolift (0.092) groups, with dysuria, hematuria, pain, and urinary urgency most commonly reported. Over 5 years, the cumulative complication rates were 15.4% for Rezum and 33.6% for Urolift. The associated 5-year PMI was 0.055 for Rezum and 0.165 for Urolift, indicating a three-fold higher long-term severity-weighted complication burden with Urolift. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified significant differences in the long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift when considering both the incidence and severity of postoperative complications. These findings may help guide clinical decision-making when selecting minimally invasive surgical options for BPH/LUTS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"545-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12864236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144742140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1