Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1007/s11255-026-05036-0
Yucen Jiang, Minfeng Hua, Ying Jiang, Yuanting Zhou, Yan Chen
Objective: To evaluate and summarize evidence related to preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing guidance for clinical healthcare professionals in managing recurrence prevention.
Methods: Literature on recurrence prevention in patients with urinary tract stones was systematically retrieved from domestic and international databases using the "6S" model, followed by quality assessment, evidence extraction, and synthesis.
Results: A total of 14 studies were included, comprising 2 guidelines, 4 systematic reviews, 3 meta-analyses, 2 expert consensus documents, 2 evidence summaries, and 1 clinical decision aid. Sixteen best evidence recommendations were identified across personnel training, assessment, nutrition, medication, and follow-up.
Conclusion: This evidence-based review summarizes the best available evidence for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical healthcare providers.
{"title":"Evidence-based recommendations for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones.","authors":"Yucen Jiang, Minfeng Hua, Ying Jiang, Yuanting Zhou, Yan Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11255-026-05036-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-026-05036-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and summarize evidence related to preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing guidance for clinical healthcare professionals in managing recurrence prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature on recurrence prevention in patients with urinary tract stones was systematically retrieved from domestic and international databases using the \"6S\" model, followed by quality assessment, evidence extraction, and synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies were included, comprising 2 guidelines, 4 systematic reviews, 3 meta-analyses, 2 expert consensus documents, 2 evidence summaries, and 1 clinical decision aid. Sixteen best evidence recommendations were identified across personnel training, assessment, nutrition, medication, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evidence-based review summarizes the best available evidence for preventing recurrence in patients with urinary tract stones, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04656-2
Faissal Tarrass, Meryem Benjelloun
{"title":"Repurposing hemodialysis reject water as a sustainable irrigation solution for football pitches.","authors":"Faissal Tarrass, Meryem Benjelloun","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04656-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04656-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"713-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144784309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04740-7
Muhammad Umer Suleman, Muhammad Mursaleen, Umer Khalil
{"title":"Reclassification of chronic kidney disease in the elderly: emphasizing the need for longitudinal outcome validation.","authors":"Muhammad Umer Suleman, Muhammad Mursaleen, Umer Khalil","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04740-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04740-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"729-730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144862172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04731-8
Bhoomeeka Jayramdass, Manohar Lal
{"title":"Reassessing CKD staging in the elderly: methodological and clinical concerns.","authors":"Bhoomeeka Jayramdass, Manohar Lal","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04731-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04731-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"725-726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144835072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8
Zunaira Naeem, Pakeezah Tabasum, Manahil Mustajab, Ahsan Abid, Muhammad Athar Khawaja, Hussain Ramzan, Yasmeen Sufi, Muhammad Talha, Nabeeha Noor, Imran Saeed, Muhammad Usman Hashmi
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nephrolithiasis is a highly prevalent urological condition, necessitating effective and minimally invasive treatment strategies. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are commonly employed for managing renal calculi, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence, providing a comprehensive assessment of surgical outcomes between PCNL and RIRS for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, reported across different study designs, various surgical techniques, and different geographical distributions to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov, up to December 2024. Risk of Bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool for RCTs. Data extraction focused on key outcomes such as stone-free rate, complications, operation time, hospital stay, and the need for blood transfusions. Statistical analysis utilized a random-effects model to pool data, with heterogeneity assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and publication bias evaluated via funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of 62 studies (25 were RCTs and 37 were cohorts) with 7021 patients revealed a significantly higher stone-free rate in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.09], p < 0.00001), indicating greater efficacy in stone clearance. However, PCNL was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (RR: 1.49, 95% CI [1.25, 1.77], p < 0.00001) and a greater need for blood transfusions (RR: 3.20, 95% CI [1.70, 6.03], p = 0.0003), associated with increased risk. Post-operative hematuria was marginally higher in the PCNL group (RR: 2.06, 95% CI [1.01, 4.19], p = 0.05). Among the PCNL techniques, all PCNL techniques showed significantly higher Hb drop; micro-PCNL was associated with the smallest hemoglobin drop relative to RIRS (MD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86), followed by mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL. Operation times were comparable between the two procedures, but PCNL resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay (MD: 1.73, 95% CI [1.35, 2.10], p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCNL demonstrates a superior stone-free rate for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, but this is accompanied by a higher risk of complications and a longer hospital stay compared to RIRS. RIRS offers a safer alternative with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, making it a viable option for at-risk patients. The use of miniaturized PCNL techniques appears to mitigate some of the complication risks associated with traditional PCNL, potentially offering a balance between efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making
{"title":"Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles.","authors":"Zunaira Naeem, Pakeezah Tabasum, Manahil Mustajab, Ahsan Abid, Muhammad Athar Khawaja, Hussain Ramzan, Yasmeen Sufi, Muhammad Talha, Nabeeha Noor, Imran Saeed, Muhammad Usman Hashmi","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nephrolithiasis is a highly prevalent urological condition, necessitating effective and minimally invasive treatment strategies. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are commonly employed for managing renal calculi, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence, providing a comprehensive assessment of surgical outcomes between PCNL and RIRS for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, reported across different study designs, various surgical techniques, and different geographical distributions to guide clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov, up to December 2024. Risk of Bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool for RCTs. Data extraction focused on key outcomes such as stone-free rate, complications, operation time, hospital stay, and the need for blood transfusions. Statistical analysis utilized a random-effects model to pool data, with heterogeneity assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and publication bias evaluated via funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of 62 studies (25 were RCTs and 37 were cohorts) with 7021 patients revealed a significantly higher stone-free rate in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.09], p < 0.00001), indicating greater efficacy in stone clearance. However, PCNL was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (RR: 1.49, 95% CI [1.25, 1.77], p < 0.00001) and a greater need for blood transfusions (RR: 3.20, 95% CI [1.70, 6.03], p = 0.0003), associated with increased risk. Post-operative hematuria was marginally higher in the PCNL group (RR: 2.06, 95% CI [1.01, 4.19], p = 0.05). Among the PCNL techniques, all PCNL techniques showed significantly higher Hb drop; micro-PCNL was associated with the smallest hemoglobin drop relative to RIRS (MD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86), followed by mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL. Operation times were comparable between the two procedures, but PCNL resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay (MD: 1.73, 95% CI [1.35, 2.10], p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCNL demonstrates a superior stone-free rate for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, but this is accompanied by a higher risk of complications and a longer hospital stay compared to RIRS. RIRS offers a safer alternative with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, making it a viable option for at-risk patients. The use of miniaturized PCNL techniques appears to mitigate some of the complication risks associated with traditional PCNL, potentially offering a balance between efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"407-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144789083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9
Henrique L Lepine, Fabio C Vicentini, Christiano Machado Filho, Guilherme Cavalcante, Fernanda M Llata, José Bessa Júnior, Leonardo O Reis, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho, Caio Vinícius Suartz
Purpose: Prostate cancer is frequently managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), which can offer excellent oncological control but with significant genitourinary morbidity. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncological, functional, and safety outcomes of HIFU versus RP in men with localized prostate cancer.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane through December 2024 for comparative studies of HIFU and RP. Fourteen studies (including two randomized trials) met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was salvage therapy-free survival (STFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, functional outcomes, and complications. Random-effect models were applied, and meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.
Results: Overall, HIFU was associated with lower STFS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02) although biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments. Focal HIFU showed fewer major complications (OR: 0.36) and significantly better erectile function preservation (OR: 6.03), but minor complications were slightly more frequent. High heterogeneity was partly explained by study design and follow-up duration. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, variable definitions of outcomes, and relatively short follow-ups in some studies.
Conclusion: For selected patients, biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments although HIFU was associated with lower STFS. Particularly as focal therapy, it shows the potential to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to radical prostatectomy while enhancing erectile function preservation, urinary continence, and reducing major complications. Further long-term prospective studies are warranted to solidify these findings.
目的:前列腺癌通常采用根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗,它可以提供良好的肿瘤控制,但有显著的泌尿生殖系统发病率。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已成为一种侵入性较小的替代方法。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较HIFU和RP治疗局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学、功能和安全性结果。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们检索了Medline, Embase和Cochrane,直到2024年12月进行HIFU和RP的比较研究。14项研究(包括2项随机试验)符合纳入标准。主要终点是挽救性无治疗生存期(STFS)。次要结局包括生化复发、无转移生存、功能结局和并发症。采用随机效应模型,meta回归探讨异质性的来源。结果:总体而言,HIFU与较低的STFS相关(优势比[OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02),尽管不同治疗间生化复发和无转移生存没有显著差异。局灶HIFU的主要并发症较少(OR: 0.36),勃起功能保存明显较好(OR: 6.03),但轻微并发症发生率略高。高异质性的部分原因是研究设计和随访时间。局限性包括实质性的异质性,结果的可变定义,以及一些研究的随访时间相对较短。结论:对于选定的患者,尽管HIFU与较低的STFS相关,但不同治疗之间的生化复发和无转移生存无显著差异。特别是作为局灶性治疗,它显示出实现与根治性前列腺切除术相当的肿瘤结果的潜力,同时增强了勃起功能的保留,尿失禁,并减少了主要并发症。需要进一步的长期前瞻性研究来巩固这些发现。
{"title":"Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Henrique L Lepine, Fabio C Vicentini, Christiano Machado Filho, Guilherme Cavalcante, Fernanda M Llata, José Bessa Júnior, Leonardo O Reis, José Maurício Mota, William Carlos Nahas, Leopoldo Alves Ribeiro-Filho, Caio Vinícius Suartz","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer is frequently managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), which can offer excellent oncological control but with significant genitourinary morbidity. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncological, functional, and safety outcomes of HIFU versus RP in men with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane through December 2024 for comparative studies of HIFU and RP. Fourteen studies (including two randomized trials) met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was salvage therapy-free survival (STFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, functional outcomes, and complications. Random-effect models were applied, and meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, HIFU was associated with lower STFS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02) although biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments. Focal HIFU showed fewer major complications (OR: 0.36) and significantly better erectile function preservation (OR: 6.03), but minor complications were slightly more frequent. High heterogeneity was partly explained by study design and follow-up duration. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, variable definitions of outcomes, and relatively short follow-ups in some studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For selected patients, biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments although HIFU was associated with lower STFS. Particularly as focal therapy, it shows the potential to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to radical prostatectomy while enhancing erectile function preservation, urinary continence, and reducing major complications. Further long-term prospective studies are warranted to solidify these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"391-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144760004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-29DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04704-x
Kevin McVary, Bronwyn Long, Amandip Cheema, Larry E Miller
Purpose: To compare the short- and long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift using standardized approaches.
Methods: We analyzed published data from the pivotal randomized trials of Rezum and Urolift. The severity of complications was independently graded by urologists using the Accordion Severity Grading System, developed by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Short- (3 months) and long-term (5 years) complication rates were assessed. Long-term complications included medical retreatment, surgical retreatment, and surgical implant removal. We calculated the weighted postoperative morbidity index (PMI) values (0-1 scale) for each procedure and performed Monte Carlo simulations to account for uncertainty in complication rates and severities.
Results: Short-term PMI values were similar between the Rezum (0.091) and Urolift (0.092) groups, with dysuria, hematuria, pain, and urinary urgency most commonly reported. Over 5 years, the cumulative complication rates were 15.4% for Rezum and 33.6% for Urolift. The associated 5-year PMI was 0.055 for Rezum and 0.165 for Urolift, indicating a three-fold higher long-term severity-weighted complication burden with Urolift. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the robustness of these findings.
Conclusions: This study identified significant differences in the long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift when considering both the incidence and severity of postoperative complications. These findings may help guide clinical decision-making when selecting minimally invasive surgical options for BPH/LUTS treatment.
{"title":"Comparing complications of Rezum and Urolift for BPH/LUTS using the Accordion Severity Grading System.","authors":"Kevin McVary, Bronwyn Long, Amandip Cheema, Larry E Miller","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04704-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11255-025-04704-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short- and long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift using standardized approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed published data from the pivotal randomized trials of Rezum and Urolift. The severity of complications was independently graded by urologists using the Accordion Severity Grading System, developed by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Short- (3 months) and long-term (5 years) complication rates were assessed. Long-term complications included medical retreatment, surgical retreatment, and surgical implant removal. We calculated the weighted postoperative morbidity index (PMI) values (0-1 scale) for each procedure and performed Monte Carlo simulations to account for uncertainty in complication rates and severities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short-term PMI values were similar between the Rezum (0.091) and Urolift (0.092) groups, with dysuria, hematuria, pain, and urinary urgency most commonly reported. Over 5 years, the cumulative complication rates were 15.4% for Rezum and 33.6% for Urolift. The associated 5-year PMI was 0.055 for Rezum and 0.165 for Urolift, indicating a three-fold higher long-term severity-weighted complication burden with Urolift. Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified significant differences in the long-term complication profiles of Rezum and Urolift when considering both the incidence and severity of postoperative complications. These findings may help guide clinical decision-making when selecting minimally invasive surgical options for BPH/LUTS treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"545-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12864236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144742140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}