Introduction: Adolescents 10-19 years account for a growing proportion of people living with HIV (PLHIV). In 2023, 140,000 adolescents were diagnosed with HIV, yet knowledge of HIV status and uptake of testing services remain critically low. Index testing - offering testing to contacts of PLHIV - is an important case-finding strategy. In 2021, PEPFAR expanded guidance to explicitly include older adolescents 15 to 19 years. We reviewed index testing data to assess uptake and case-finding trends among biological adolescent-aged children and siblings of PLHIV 10-19 years.
Methods: Routinely collected programmatic data from 27 USAID-supported PEPFAR country and regional programs were analyzed for fiscal years (FY) 2017 through FY2022 (October 2016 - September 2022). We compared the volume of index testing and subsequent new diagnoses across FYs and countries among biological adolescent-aged children and siblings of PLHIV, and disaggregated by age, 10-14 and 15-19 years, and sex.
Results: Index testing among adolescents 10-19 years increased from FY17 to FY22, nearly doubling from 147,088 to 291,534. Similarly, new diagnoses among adolescents increased between FY17 and FY22 (3,721 vs 10,730). Overall, across FYs, index testing uptake and case-finding were higher among females than males, and the gap in testing uptake between sexes was larger for older than younger adolescents.
Conclusion: Index testing uptake has increased substantially among adolescents over time, with rebounded gains for adolescents 15-19 years noted beginning in FY21. However, uptake across age and sex remained uneven, highlighting an opportunity to ensure targeted testing strategies are employed to reach adolescents 15-19 years and males.
Background: HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) can reduce the effectiveness of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs in preventing morbidity and mortality, limit options for treatment, and prevention. Our study aimed to assess HIV-1 subtypes and HIVDR among key populations in HIV Sentinel Surveillance Plus Behavior (HSS+) in 2018 and 2020.
Methods: One-stage venue-based cluster sampling was used to recruit participants at hotspots identified for Men who have sex with men (MSM) in 7 provinces and SEM females and female sex worker (FSW) in 13 provinces. Participants completed a standard questionnaire about risk and preventive behaviors, and ART history, and provided intravenous blood for HIV testing. HIVDR testing was conducted on HIV-positive samples with VL >1,000 copies/ml.
Results: A total of 185/435 (42.5%) HIV-positive samples had viral load ≥1,000 copies/ml, of which 130/136 from MSM and 26/49 from FSW, were successfully sequenced. Six HIV-1 subtypes were detected (CRF01_AE, A, CRF07/08_BC, B, C, CRF25_cpx), with CRF01_AE (82.7%, 129/156) the most common. Drug resistance mutations were detected in 16.7% of participants overall (26/156), in 15.4% (20/130) of MSM, and in 23.1% (6/26) of FSW. Mutations associated with resistance to NNRTI were the most frequently detected (73.1%, 19/26). The high level of resistance was presented in NNRTI and NRTI classes. There are 10 major resistance mutations detected with NRTI (M184VI-25.0%, K65KR-50.0%, Y115F-25%), NNRTI (K103N-21.1%, E138A-10.5%, V106M-5.3%, K101E-5.3%, G190A-5.3%) PI (L33F-40.0%, M46L-20.0%).
Conclusions: Vietnam's HSS+ system identified an emerging strain of HIV-1 and mutations associated with resistance to multiple drug classes among MSM and FSW.
Background: We examined the impact of integrated stepped alcohol treatment with contingency management (ISAT+CM) on alcohol abstinence among people with HIV (PWH) and unhealthy alcohol use.
Methods: In this multisite 24-week trial, we randomized PWH reporting untreated unhealthy alcohol use and with phosphatidylethanol (PEth) >20ng/mL to receive ISAT+CM or treatment as usual (TAU). Intervention: Step 1: Social worker-delivered CM; Step 2: Addiction physician management plus motivational enhancement therapy. Participants were advanced to step 2 at week 12 if they lacked evidence of abstinence over the prior 21 days. TAU: Health handout, and for those who met criteria for alcohol use disorder, a referral to substance use treatment. Primary outcome: self-reported abstinence over the past 21 days at week 24.
Results: We enrolled 120 PWH between January 5, 2018 and March 1, 2022. Mean age was 59 years, 96% were men, and 83% were Black. Eight percent were lost to follow-up. In the ISAT+CM group, 87% were advanced to Step 2. The posterior mean proportion of participants with self-reported abstinence at 24 weeks was higher among those randomized to ISAT+CM (posterior mean proportion 9% [95%CrI, 0%, 33%]) compared with TAU (posterior mean proportion 0.3 % [95%CrI, 0%, 4%]) (posterior mean treatment effect 9%, [95%CrI, 1%, 32%], the posterior probability of TAU being superior to ISAT+CM was <0.0001.
Discussion: ISAT+CM delivered in HIV clinics modestly increased self-reported 3-week abstinence among PWH. Our findings indicate a need for more effective treatments to promote abstinence and a potential role for ISAT+CM for reductions in alcohol use.
Background: Case identification remains a challenge to reaching the United Nations 95-95-95 targets for children with HIV. While the World Health Organization approved oral mucosal HIV self-testing (HIVST) for children over 2 years in 2019, there is little information on HIVST for pediatric case identification in Ethiopia.
Setting: Nine health facilities across Ethiopia.
Methods: We implemented a pilot program from November 2021-April 2022 to assess acceptability and feasibility of using HIVST to screen children 2-14 years of adult index clients, (i.e., parents/caregivers living with HIV and on antiretroviral therapy). HIV-positive adults who had children with unknown HIV status were given HIVST kits (OraQuick®) to screen their children at home. Parents/caregivers were asked to report results telephonically and bring children screening positive to the health facility for confirmatory HIV testing. We defined HIVST acceptability as ≥50% of parents/caregivers accepting testing and ≥50% reporting results within seven days of receiving a test kit. Feasibility was defined as ≥60% of children with a reactive HIVST receiving confirmatory testing and <5 serious social harms reported per 1000 kits distributed.
Results: Overall, 1496 of 1651 (91%) parents/caregivers accepted HIVST kits to test their children at home and 1204 (71%) reported results within seven days. Of 17 children (1%) with reactive results, 13 (76%) received confirmatory testing; of which 7 (54%) were confirmed to be HIV-positive. One serious social harm was reported.
Conclusion: Providing adult parents/caregivers with HIVST kits to screen their children at home is an acceptable and feasible strategy to reach untested children and improve pediatric case finding in a low prevalence setting.
Background: HIV envelope (env) diversity may result in resistance to broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). Assessment of genotypic or phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral treatment is often performed in people with HIV-1 (PWH) and used for clinical trial screening for HIV-1 bNAb susceptibility. Optimal bNAb susceptibility screening methods are not yet clear.
Methods: Phenotypic and genotypic analyses were conducted on 124 screening samples from a Phase 1b study of bNAbs teropavimab (3BNC117-LS) and zinlirvimab (10-1074-LS) administered with lenacapavir in virally suppressed PWH. Phenotypic analysis was conducted on integrated HIV-1 provirus and stimulated outgrowth virus, with susceptibility to bNAbs defined as 90% inhibitory concentration ≤2 μg/mL. The proviral DNA HIV env gene was genotyped using deep sequencing, and bNAb susceptibility predicted using published env amino acid signatures.
Results: Proviral phenotypic results were reported for 109 of 124 samples; 75% (82/109) were susceptible to teropavimab, 65% (71/109) to zinlirvimab, and 50% (55/109) to both bNAbs. Phenotypic susceptibility of outgrowth viruses was available for 39 samples; 56% (22/39) were susceptible to teropavimab, and 64% (25/39) to zinlirvimab. Phenotypic susceptibilities correlated between these methods: teropavimab r = 0.82 (P<0.0001); zinlirvimab r = 0.77 (P<0.0001). Sixty-seven samples had genotypic and phenotypic data. Proviral genotypic signatures predicted proviral phenotypic susceptibility with high positive predictive value (68-86% teropavimab; 63-90% zinlirvimab).
Conclusions: bNAb susceptibility was correlated among all three in-vitro assays used to determine teropavimab and zinlirvimab susceptibility in virally suppressed PWH. These findings may help refine PWH selection criteria for eligibility for future studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：