Journal of cataract and refractive surgery最新文献

Topic: To examine the association between virtual postoperative follow-up care and patient outcomes after cataract surgery.

Clinical relevance: Cataract surgery is a safe and commonly performed surgery. Follow-up visits are used to monitor for complications. It is uncertain whether virtual follow-up provides a safe alternative to in-person review.

Methods: Medline, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to October 2023 for relevant articles containing original data. Studies that: 1) included patients that were seen in a virtual follow-up (i.e., telephone or video call) for postoperative appointments after cataract surgery, and 2) reported patient outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and ROB2 assessment tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. The review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number, CRD42023477207) and PRISMA guidelines were followed.

Results: The search yielded 1710 records with seven studies included in this review. The seven studies reported on 2113 cataract surgeries in 1994 patients. The studies ranged between 2004 and 2020. Most of the studies (5/7) included only patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery. Virtual follow-ups were all conducted by telephone. The follow-up calls were made at varying timepoints including postoperative day 1 (n= 3), day 7 (n=2) and day 14 (n=1). Two observational studies directly compared patients who had a telephone follow-up to a control group who had an in-person follow-up. There were no significant differences in complication rates (p=0.22) or visual acuity (p=0.28) between these follow-up groups. None of the studies reported serious adverse outcomes from replacing in-person follow-up with telephone follow-up. One study used virtual follow-up in conjunction with in-person visits for elderly patients and found that additional telephone follow-up was associated with decreased surgical recovery time and decreased patient anxiety. Three studies reported on patient perceptions about telephone follow-up. A common theme was that patients preferred telephone reviews and found them to be more convenient than in-person follow-up.

Conclusions: For patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery, virtual follow-ups seem to be a safe alternative to in-person visits and were preferred by patients. These conclusions are preliminary given the limited literature base, and further study is needed.

Topic: To evaluate the complication rates of different IOL placement methods in adults with inadequate capsular bag support.

Clinical relevance: The surgical correction of inadequate capsular bag support for the intraocular lens (IOL) harbors several challenges, and there is a wide-range of surgical procedures.

Methods: For the purpose of this meta-analysis, surgical methods were grouped based on the location of IOL placement: (i) AC placement, (ii) iris fixation, which included prepupillary or retropupillary placement of an iris-claw IOL, or iris suturing of an IOL (iii) scleral fixation, which included scleral sutured and sutureless techniques. Only studies comparing the results of two or more different placement methods were analyzed. The study protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023458557).

Results: Fifteen studies were included in the final analysis, which reported results of 1,247 eyes. The overall complication rate was non-significantly lower in iris fixation (4.4%; 95%CI: 3.6-5.4%, P=0.150) than in AC placement (7.4%; 95%CI: 6.4-7.9%) and scleral fixation (7.4%; 95%CI: 6.5-8.4%). Transient corneal edema was the most common complication in AC placement (29.9%; 95%CI: 2.4-57.5%, P<0.001), compared to scleral fixation (11.9%; 95%CI: 2.6-21.2%) and iris fixation (4.1%; 95%CI: 0.8-7.3%;). Vitreous hemorrhages were more frequently reported following scleral fixation (8.5%; 95%CI: 6.3-11.2%, P=0.006) than in AC placement (5.4%; 95%CI 3.4-8.5%) and iris fixation, 1.4%; 95%CI 0.4-4.2%), and so was IOL decentration/dislocation (8.9%; 95%CI: 6.7-11.8%, P=0.047 compared to 1.1%; 95%CI: 0.4-3.4% and 4.0%; 95%CI: 2.2-7.3%, respectively).

Conclusion: The risks associated with particular techniques should be taken into account in preoperative counseling and planning postoperative treatment.

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for myopic eyes requiring negative diopter powered IOLs.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: K… hospital and Y… Hospital, …, ….

Methods: Sixty-one eyes that underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a negative power IOL were investigated. The trueness, precision and accuracy of IOL power calculation were assessed for the Barrett Universal II (BUII), EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulas using the Eyetemis online tool. The analysis was performed using 1) the ULIB IOL constants and 2) after constant optimization.

Results: With ULIB constants, the Haigis, Holladay 1 and SRK/T resulted in a hyperopic mean prediction error (PE) >1.00 diopter (D), which was significantly different from zero (adjusted p <0.05). The mean PE of the remaining formulas was closer to zero. The absolute PE was significantly higher with the Holladay 1 and SRK/T (adjusted p <0.05) with respect to the remaining formulas. After constant optimization, the outcomes of traditional formulas improved and no statistically significant differences were found among any of the formulas in terms of trueness, precision and accuracy. The percentage of eyes with an absolute PE within 0.50 D was low (<50%) even after constant optimization.

Conclusions: With ULIB constants, the BUII, EVO 2.0 and Hoffer QST were more accurate than traditional formulas in eyes with negative-diopter IOLs. The results of IOL power calculation in these eyes remain poor even after constant optimization.

Purpose: To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject to phacoemulsification alone.

Setting: Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) registry - Australia.

Design: Prospective observational registry study.

Methods: Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group) were compared to eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone). Primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% IOP reduction from baseline 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events and secondary procedures.

Results: At 12 months the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP at 12 months was significantly higher in the iStent group compared to the cataract alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% p<0.001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared to cataract alone.

Conclusions: Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has higher efficacy and a reduced need for secondary IOP lowering surgery compared to phacoemulsification alone.

Purpose: To assess postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) rates and risk factors after secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for preoperative aphakia and IOL exchange combined with or without vitrectomy.

Setting: Medicare fee for service (FFS) beneficiaries, United States.

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: Medicare FFS beneficiaries who underwent IOL exchange or secondary IOL implantation for preoperative aphakia between January 1, 2011 - November 19, 2022 were identified. POE rates were calculated overall and separately for each surgical category - secondary IOL for aphakia versus IOL exchange, with subsets for concurrent anterior or posterior vitrectomy. Multi-variate analysis of potential risk factors was implemented.

Results: 97,152 patients were included. The 42-day POE rates for secondary IOL implantation for aphakia and for IOL exchange were 0.35% and 0.28% overall, 0.31% and 0.30% when combined with posterior vitrectomy, and 0.84% and 0.42% with anterior vitrectomy. The risk of POE increased when secondary IOL surgery was combined with anterior vitrectomy compared to no vitrectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.849; p<0.001) and with higher Charlson comorbidity indexes compared to 0: 1-2 (aOR 1.495; p=0.01), 3-4 (aOR 1.591; p=0.01), 5-6 (aOR 1.617; p=0.046), ≥7 (aOR 3.290; p<0.001). Risk was decreased for IOL exchange compared to secondary IOL implantation for preoperative aphakia (aOR 0.783; p=0.04).

Conclusion: The overall POE rate for all secondary IOL surgeries was 0.31% during the 11-year period. We hypothesize that absence of the posterior capsular barrier would explain the higher POE rates compared with cataract surgery, especially if a concurrent vitrectomy was performed with the secondary IOL procedure.

Purpose: To report initial surgical experience and learning curve with a novel finger-controlled, ultrasoundless lens extractor device and provide insights for future surgical endeavors.

Setting: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (Miami, FL).

Design: Single-center, non-comparative, retrospective, consecutive case series.

Methods: 61 eyes of 51 individuals with cataract. All surgeries were performed with the miCOR® 700 lens extractor (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) by a single experienced physician. Nuclear density was graded preoperatively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and pachymetry were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Surgical videos were reviewed to collect data on time for each surgical step and complications. Regression analyses assessed the learning curve, performance improvement and effects of nuclear density on surgical time and postoperative pachymetric variation.

Results: Subjects had a mean age of 72.2 ± 7.6 years. Increased surgical experience significantly reduced procedure time (P < 0.001), nuclear removal time (P = 0.018) and cortex removal time (P = 0.002). Higher nuclear density resulted in longer procedure (P < 0.001) and nuclear removal time (P < 0.001). One posterior capsular rent occurred, not attributed to the lens extractor. No thermal damage to the corneal wound was observed. Postoperative CDVA improved significantly (P < 0.001 for eyes without ocular comorbidities, P = 0.016 for eyes with ocular comorbidities). All cases of corneal edema and IOP spikes resolved within a month.

Conclusions: The miCOR® 700 lens extractor offers an innovative, cost-effective approach to cataract surgery. Further research is needed to compare it with conventional phacoemulsification techniques.

Purpose: To assess the 6-month visual and refractive outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) as compared to laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a military population at a Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center.

Setting: Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center (JWRSC), Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX.

Design: Retrospective Study.

Methods: Patients who underwent either KLEx, PRK, or LASIK between 2019-2022 were included. Anonymized data collected included demographics, pre- and post-operative uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, and manifest refraction.

Results: Of the 4,466 treated eyes, 737 (16.5%) underwent the KLEx, 2,801 (62.7%) underwent PRK, and 928 (20.8%) underwent LASIK treatment. In terms of efficacy, there was no statistically significant difference at post-operative month (POM)6 between the percentage of eyes reaching an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better between the three procedures. At POM1 (P < 0.001) and POM3 (P < 0.001), there were a greater number of eyes in the KLEx group that achieved the same or 1 line better of distance visual acuity than the PRK group. The efficacy index of KLEx, PRK, and LASIK at POM6 were 1.09, 1.10, and 0.97, respectively. The safety index for KLEx, PRK, and LASIK at POM6 were 0.96, 1.01, and 0.81, respectively.

Conclusions: After the initial recovery period, KLEx demonstrates comparable outcomes in terms of efficacy, safety, and accuracy as compared to LASIK and PRK.

Purpose: To assess the power profile and optical performance of 2 extended range-of-vision (ERV) intraocular lenses (IOLs), TECNIS Eyhance (ICB00) and LuxSmart, and compare them with their monofocal counterpart lenses with similar platforms and materials: TECNIS 1-piece (ZCB00) and LuxGood, respectively.

Setting: Optics and Optometry Faculties of Complutense University (Madrid) and Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech (Terrassa) in Spain.

Design: Laboratory investigation on optical bench.

Methods: For each design, the power distribution and (fourth and sixth-order) spherical aberration (SA) across the lens aperture were measured as well as the optical performance using modulation transfer function-based metrics with through-focus evaluation. 3 nominal powers (+10.00 diopters [D], +20.00 D, and +30.00 D) and 3 pupil sizes (2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.5 mm) were considered to assess whether the base power of the lens and pupillary dynamics have an influence on the depth-of-focus extension.

Results: TECNIS Eyhance and LuxSmart IOLs had different power and SA profiles, but both designs shared a positive add power in their central region in comparison with their monofocal counterparts. LuxSmart had a greater add power while TECNIS Eyhance showed higher peak optical quality but smaller depth of focus.

Conclusions: Differences of focus extension between the 2 ERV IOL designs are related to differences of power and SA profile. The nominal base power of the IOLs has little effect on their optical quality. However, pupil dynamics plays a key role since it determines the effective add power and optical performance of the ERV IOLs.

Purpose: To explore the severity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) using objective detection techniques and its relationship with visual acuity.

Setting: The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: All patients underwent slitlamp examination, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) testing before Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy, and examination, after fully dilated, with: IOLMaster 700, optical coherence tomography (OCT), Sirius Topographer (CSO) anterior segment analysis, and color fundus photography (CFP). CDVA and IOP were taken post treatment. Thickness and density of the posterior capsule, CFP quality (CFPQ) and OCT signal strength (OCTSS) were recorded. Analysis used Spearman correlation, heatmaps, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: 83 eyes in 78 patients were included in this study. Spearman correlation analysis revealed correlations between pretreatment CDVA and IOLMaster 700 PCO thickness (MT), IOLMaster 700 cumulative effect (MCE), Sirius PCO thickness (ST), Sirius maximum density (SMD), Sirius cumulative effect (SCE), OCTSS, and CFPQ (correlation coefficients were 0.500, 0.484, 0.465, -0.256, 0.317, -0.442, -0.412, all P < .05). The improvement of vision acuity (ImpVA) showed correlations with MT, MCE, ST, SCE, OCTSS, and CFPQ (correlation coefficients were -0.452, -0.471, -0.346, -0.278, 0.320, 0.381, all P < .05). For ImpVA, the predictive ability of IOLMaster 700 was superior to Sirius, and the joint model was significantly better than single factors.

Conclusions: Posterior capsule thickness and cumulative effect were reliable indicators for evaluating PCO. Compared with Sirius, the IOLMaster 700 demonstrated superior predictive ability and higher correlation.