Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine最新文献

In the latest ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease, right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid annulus dilatation were reported to be the most important parameters to consider in patient selection for tricuspid valve interventions. Indeed, comprehensive right ventricular assessment is crucial in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation who may benefit from transcatheter or surgical procedures. However, the only guideline parameter considered for intervention has been tricuspid annular dilatation in the presence of at least mild to moderate tricuspid regurgitation, with no other right ventricular markers used in the decision-making process for invasive treatment. Notably, challenges in the assessment of right ventricular function may limit establishing thresholds for defining right ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the prognostic significance of right ventricular function in patients with tricuspid regurgitation undergoing percutaneous or surgical interventions.

Background: Nearly two-thirds of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have right ventricular dysfunction, previously identified as an independent predictor of reduced functional capacity and poor prognosis. Beta-blocker therapy (β-BT) reduces mortality and hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF and is approved as first-line therapy regardless of concomitant right ventricular function. However, the exact role of sympathetic nervous system activation in right ventricular dysfunction and the potential usefulness (or harmfulness) of β-BT in these patients are still unclear.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the medium-term effect of β-BT discontinuation on functional capacity and right ventricular remodelling based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), echocardiography and serum biomarkers in patients with clinically stable biventricular dysfunction.

Methods: In this single-centre, open-label, prospective trial, 16 patients were enrolled using the following criteria: patients were clinically stable without signs of peripheral congestion; NYHA II-III while on optimal medical therapy (including β-BT); LVEF 40% or less; echocardiographic criteria of right ventricular dysfunction. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 either to withdraw (group 0) or continue (group 1) β-BT. In group 0, optimal heart rate was obtained with alternative rate-control drugs. Echo and serum biomarkers were performed at baseline, after 3 and 6 months; CPET was performed at baseline and 6 months. Mann--Whitney U test was adopted to determine the relationships between β-BT discontinuation and effects on right ventricular dysfunction.

Results: At 6 months' follow up, S' DTI improved (ΔS': 1.01 vs. -0.92 cm/s; P = 0.03), while estimated PAPs (ΔPAPs: 0.8 vs. -7.5 mmHg; P = 0.04) and echo left ventricular-remodelling (ΔEDVi: 19.55 vs. -0.96 ml/mq; P = 0.03) worsened in group 0. In absolute terms, the only variables significantly affected by β-BT withdrawal were left ventricular EDV and ESV, appearing worse in group 0 (mean EDVi 115 vs. 84 ml/mq; mean ESVi 79 vs. 53.9 ml/mq, P = 0.03). No significant changes in terms of functional capacity were observed after β-BT withdrawal.

Conclusion: In HFrEF patients with concomitant right ventricular dysfunction, β-BT discontinuation did not produce any beneficial effects. In addition, despite maintenance of optimal heart rate control, β-BT discontinuation induced worsening of left ventricular remodelling. Our study corroborates the hypothesis that improvement in left ventricular function may likewise be a major determinant for improvement in right ventricular function, reducing pulmonary wedge pressure and right ventricular afterload, with only a marginal action of its negative inotropic effect. In conclusion, β-BT appears beneficial also in heart failure patients with biventricular dysfunct

Background: Hospitalization is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure, but its prognostic role in advanced heart failure is still unsettled. We evaluated the prognostic role of heart failure hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure.

Methods: The multicenter HELP-HF registry enrolled consecutive patients with heart failure and at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who were hospitalized for decompensated heart failure (inpatients) or not (outpatients) at the time of enrolment. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or first heart failure hospitalization.

Results: Among the 1149 patients included [mean age 75.1 ± 11.5 years, 67.3% men, median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% (IQR 25-50%)], 777 (67.6%) were inpatients at the time of enrolment. As compared with outpatients, inpatients had lower LVEF, higher natriuretic peptides and a worse clinical profile. The 1-year rate of the primary endpoint was 50.9% in inpatients versus 36.8% in outpatients [crude hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-2.07, P < 0.001]. At multivariable analysis, inpatient status was independently associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.23-1.93, P < 0.001). Among inpatients, the independent predictors of the primary endpoint were older age, lower SBP, heart failure association criteria for advanced heart failure and glomerular filtration rate 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less.

Conclusion: Hospitalization for heart failure in patients with at least one high-risk 'I NEED HELP' marker is associated with an extremely poor prognosis supporting the need for specific interventions, such as mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis, are characterized by somatic gene mutations in bone marrow stem cells, which trigger an inflammatory response influencing the development of associated cardiovascular complications. In recent years, the same mutations were found in individuals with cardiovascular diseases even in the absence of hematological alterations. These genetic events allow the identification of a new entity called 'clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential' (CHIP), as it was uncertain whether it could evolve toward hematological malignancies. CHIP is age-related and, remarkably, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure were frequently reported in these individuals and attributed to systemic chronic inflammation driven by the genetic mutation. We reviewed the connection between clonal hematopoiesis, inflammation, and cardiovascular diseases, with a practical approach to improve clinical practice and highlight the current unmet needs in this area of knowledge.

Aims: Timing and surgical strategies in acute infective endocarditis are still questionable. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVR) compared with mitral valve replacement [mitral valve prosthesis (MVP)] for acute infective endocarditis.

Methods: From 2004 to 2019, 109 consecutive patients with acute mitral valve infective endocarditis were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical strategy: MVR 53/109 (48.6%) versus MVP 56/109 (51.4%). Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and overall survival at 10 years. Secondary end point was the freedom from infective endocarditis relapse.

Results: Our institutional surgical approach for infective endocarditis allowed us to achieve MVR in 48.6% of patients. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups [MVR: 1/53 (1.9%) versus MVP: 2/56 (3.6%), P  = 1.000]. Overall 10-year survival was 80.0 ± 14.1 and 77.2 ± 13.5% for MVR and MVP, respectively ( P  = 0.648). MVR showed a lower incidence of infective endocarditis relapse compared with MVP (MVR: 93.6 ± 7.1 versus MVP: 80.9 ± 10.8%, P  = 0.041). At Cox regression, infective endocarditis relapse was an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio 4.03; 95% confidence interval 1.41-11.52; P  = 0.009).

Conclusion: The tendency to postpone surgery in stable patients with mitral infective endocarditis allowed achievement of MVR in almost 50% of patients. Although repair remains the approach of choice in our institution, no differences between MVR and MVP were reported in terms of early/late survival. However, MVP had a higher incidence of infective endocarditis relapse that represents an independent risk of mortality.

Refractory angina pectoris (RAP) defined as chronic anginal chest pain because of coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major problem. The increase in the number of patients with RAP in recent years is because of the increasing aging population and improved survival rates among patients with CAD. Management of patients with RAP is often extremely challenging. In this review, we present several interventional approaches for RAP, including device therapies, lifestyle intervention, and cell therapies. Some of these treatments are currently used in the management of RAP, whereas other treatments are under investigation.

In the latest European guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, mechanical valve prostheses maintain a strategic role, particularly for certain patient subsets and age groups. Despite the high number of devices implanted in clinical practice, particularly in non-European and North American regions, current scientific literature and debate seem to suggest a limited use of mechanical heart valves. The cardiac surgery community seems to be highly interested in biological and transcatheter valve prostheses but less interested in mechanical heart valves, including possible strategies for self-management of anticoagulation therapy. In this respect, the Italian Society of Cardiac Surgery (SICCH), in particular the Italian Group of Research for Outcome in Cardiac Surgery (GIROC), has promoted a survey among its members to stimulate the interest in this topic and express their opinion on this issue that, due to the prevalence of the affected population and the new treatment options for improving patients' quality of life, should be more appraised and debated in the cardiac surgery community. The recorded results, obtained on the answers to 111 questionnaires, seem to divide the specialists into 'pros' and 'contras' on a useful tool for the entire cardiac surgery community. For this reason, SICCH proposes in conclusion to declare its unified and institutional opinion on this topic.

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. Nonetheless, computerized tomography angiography (CTA) is readily used to exclude LAA thrombus before pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and LAA closure procedures. We aimed to assess the comparability of LAA thrombus diagnosis using chest CTA scans in patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TEE.

Methods: Retrospective collection of consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TEE and chest CTA within 30 days and had evidence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) or LAA thrombus on TEE. Clinical, demographic, and echo data were collected. Prospective analysis of the CTA for evidence of LAA thrombus in the same group of patients was performed. We compared the findings of the two modalities.

Results: Out of 1550 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent TEE examinations in the study period, 63 patients underwent TEE within 30 days of a chest CTA scan. Twenty-three patients had LAA thrombus and 40 had some degree of SEC according to TEE. On CTA, 11 were interpreted as positive with a high level of suspicion for the presence of an LAA thrombus. Six patients (26.1%) had LAA thrombus according to both CT and TEE. Therefore, low concordance was found between test results (chi-squared continuity correction = 5.5, df  = 1, and P -value = 0.01902).

Conclusion: The discrepancy between CTA and TEE results suggests these examinations might be more suitable as complementary examinations to exclude LAA thrombus.