Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology最新文献

Background: Pleural effusions remain a common postoperative complication following lung transplantation, occurring in 10% to 26% of cases. We aimed to explore potential clinical or radiographic features associated with clinically significant post-lung transplant pleural effusions requiring repeat interventions for their management.

Methods: Lung transplantation recipients who underwent thoracentesis at our institution between June 2012 and October 2022 were reviewed. In total, 77 patients were included. Data were collected via the electronic health record and adjudicated through direct chart review. Patients were stratified by the need for a single thoracentesis (control group) or additional interventions, including serial thoracentesis, pigtail placement, and surgery (composite group). The computed tomography (CT) of the chest before the first thoracentesis was reviewed by a thoracic radiologist who was blinded to patient outcome.

Results: Single thoracentesis was used to manage 25 (32.5%) patients, 4 (5.2%) required multiple thoracenteses, 42 (54.5%) required a pigtail catheter, and 6 (7.8%) required decortication for definitive management. In the composite group compared with the control group, who were managed by a single thoracentesis, there was an increased incidence of loculations (36.8% vs. 8%, P=0.01), rounded atelectasis (22.8% vs. 4%, P=0.05), and larger effusion size (P=0.01). The composite group had higher pleural fluid eosinophils (0.33% vs. 0% in control, P = <0.01) and monocytes (14.8% vs. 7.3%, P=0.04) levels.

Conclusion: Baseline imaging, such as larger effusion size, loculations and rounded atelectasis, and pleural fluid cell profile with increased eosinophils and monocytes, can potentially identify clinically significant and refractory pleural effusions.

Background: Open window thoracostomy (OTW) is the standard of care for debilitated patients with chronic pleural infection and nonexpandable lungs (NEL) who are not candidates for major surgical intervention. Tunneled pleural catheters (TPC) offer tremendous treatment potential in this setting based on their efficacy in malignant pleural effusion and NEL. We aim to assess the efficacy, safety, and health care utilization of TPC in this setting.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent TPC procedures for the long-term management of chronic pleural infection and NEL who were not candidates for major surgical intervention. Clinically, complete treatment success was defined as fever abatement, normalization of white cell count, and stoppage of antimicrobial therapy without requiring surgical intervention. It is deemed a partial success if chronic antimicrobial suppression is still needed.

Results: There were 20 patients who had TPC placed for chronic pleural infection with NEL. Clinical and partial treatment success was achieved in 9/17 and 8/17 patients, respectively, excluding 3 patients who were placed on comfort measures only. The median change in pleural volume was -218 mL. The median length of stay after TPC placement was 4.5 days. TPC was removed in 8 patients due to successful obliteration of pleural space in a median duration of 46.5 days. Four patients passed away with TPCs in place, 7 retained TPCs at the last health care system contact, and 1 patient had OTW due to TPC failure.

Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that TPC is an effective and safe intervention for the management of patients with chronic pleural infection and NEL lung who are not candidates for surgical intervention.

Background: Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is commonly performed by a broad spectrum of practitioners. Aside from relative contraindications such as morbid obesity, coagulopathy, and complex airway anatomy, it is preferred over surgical tracheostomy in the critically ill. Rigid bronchoscopy-guided (RBG) PDT provides a secure airway, allows for unobstructed ventilation, protects the posterior membrane from puncture, and increases suction capacity.

Methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent RBG-PDT from 2008 to 2023 at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Electronic medical records were reviewed for preprocedural demographic data, procedural events, and postprocedural outcomes.

Results: A total of 104 patients underwent RBG-PDT over a 15-year period. Median patient age was 61.95 (95% CI: 59.00-64.90), median BMI was 30.25 kg/m2 (IQR, 23.6 to 37.2) with 41.9% (32.5% to 51.3%) of patients included having a BMI over 30 kg/m2. PDT placement occurred in a mean of 13.7 days after intubation, with 70% due to prolonged mechanical ventilation resulting from ongoing respiratory failure. In all, 51.0% of patients had at least one increased bleeding risk factor, with an increased aPTT >36 seconds being the most common (36.5%). In all, 26.9% of patients underwent tracheostomy with ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin. In total, 60.6% of patients received concomitant percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. No cases of pneumothorax or loss of the airway at the time of exchange of the endotracheal tube for rigid tracheoscopy were reported.

Conclusion: RBG-PDT is a safe and effective procedure extending the patient population appropriate for PDT when performed by an experienced Interventional Pulmonology team.

Background: Mucus plugging is a common complication of airway stenting. There is no data or guidance on the best airway hygiene regimen and consequently wide practice variation exists.

Methods: This single-center, nonblinded, randomized, pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nebulized 3% saline (3%S) versus normal saline (NS) in reducing the incidence of mucus plugging in adult patients that undergo central airway stent placement. Patients were enrolled immediately after stent placement and randomized to nebulized 3%S or NS (3 mL) 3 times a day. Patients were scheduled for surveillance bronchoscopy in 4 to 6 weeks. Unscheduled bronchoscopies due to symptomatic mucus plugging were recorded.

Results: From December 2022 to March 2024, 37 patients were screened, and 35 were enrolled. Four in the 3%S and 8 in the NS group did not undergo a surveillance bronchoscopy and were excluded from the final analysis. During surveillance bronchoscopy for the 3%S (n=13) and NS (n=10) groups, obstructive mucus plugging was noted in 7.7% versus 40%, granulation requiring intervention in 7.7% versus 10%, and >25% circumferential biofilm in 0% versus 30%, respectively. In the 3%S versus NS groups, 0% versus 20% of patients required an unscheduled bronchoscopy due to mucus plugging. There were no side effects reported with the daily use of 3%S or NS.

Conclusion: Nebulized 3%S is safe and may be equally or more effective than NS in preventing obstructive mucus plugging in patients who undergo airway stenting. A larger blinded randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm this finding.

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure that has become an important tool in the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymph node lesions in lung cancer. Adequate sedation is an important part of the procedure as it provides patient comfort and potentially increases diagnostic yield. The sedation modality varies among centers and includes moderate sedation/conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. The object of this study will be the evaluation of patient's comfort and level of satisfaction with the involved health care providers (bronchoscopist and anesthesiologist) of remifentanil administration in target-controlled infusion (TCI) for conscious sedation in patients undergoing EBUS‑TBNA, with a prospective randomized study design versus the of standard sedation protocol with midazolam and/or fentanest and/or propofol.

Methods: This study was carried out at the "Campus Biomedico di Roma" University Hospital between September 2021 and November 2021, with a total number of 30 patients enrolled who met the eligibility criteria, randomly divided into 2 groups: group 1 "REMIFENTANIL TCI" (experimental group) where the patients performed the EBUS-TBNA procedure under conscious sedation with infusion of remifentanil TCI with a target between 3 ng/mL and 6 ng/mL and group 2 "STANDARD" (control group) with patients undergoing conscious sedation with the association of midazolam and/or fentanest and/or propofol in refracted boluses based on clinical needs. Complications, safety, and level of satisfaction of the operator, the anesthesiologist, and the patient were evaluated.

Results: The results show that sedation with remifentanil in TCI can improve the comfort level of patients, reducing the risks associated with the procedure (lower frequency of oversedations and hypotension), allowing for greater intraprocedural safety. Furthermore, the level of satisfaction of the anesthesiologist and that of the operator appears to be significantly higher in the Remifentanil group.

Conclusion: The execution of a mild to moderate sedation with Remifentanil in TCI in patients undergoing EBUS is safe, tolerated, and allows to obtain greater intraprocedural comfort. Further studies and larger and more representative samples are obviously needed to confirm and strengthen the validity of a remifentanil TCI-based sedation in endoscopic diagnostics.

Background: Dexmedetomidine has acceptable clinical utility for inducing sedation during flexible bronchoscopy. Reducing its dose may not only ameliorate its cardiovascular side effects, but also maintain its clinical usefulness.

Methods: Patients between 18 and 65 years were randomized to either dexmedetomidine (0.75 µg/kg) or the midazolam-fentanyl group (0.035 mg/kg midazolam and 25 mcg fentanyl). The primary outcome measure was the composite score. Other parameters noted were: oxygen saturation, hemodynamic variables, Modified Ramsay Sedation Score, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity and distress, Visual Analog Scale score for cough, rescue medication doses, ease of doing bronchoscopy, and patient response 24 hours after bronchoscopy.

Results: In each arm, 31 patients were enrolled. The composite score at the nasopharynx was in the ideal category in 26 patients in dexmedetomidine and 21 in the midazolam-fentanyl group (P=0.007). At the tracheal level, the corresponding values were 24 and 16 (P=0.056). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the secondary outcome measures except hemodynamic parameters. The mean heart rate in the dexmedetomidine and midazolam-fentanyl groups, respectively, was as follows: at 10 minutes after start of FB (90.10±14.575, 104.35±18.48; P=0.001), at the end of FB (98.39±18.70, 105.94±17.45; P=0.016), and at 10 minutes after end of FB (89.84±12.02, 93.90±13.74; P=0.022). No patient developed bradycardia. Two patients (P=0.491) in the dexmedetomidine group developed hypotension.

Conclusion: Low-dose dexmedetomidine (0.75 μg/kg single dose) appears to lead to a better composite score compared with the midazolam-fentanyl combination.

Background: Short-term airway stent placement (stent evaluation) has been employed to evaluate whether patients with excessive central airway collapse (ECAC) will benefit from tracheobronchoplasty. Although retrospective studies have explored the impact of stent placement on ECAC, prospective randomized controlled trials are absent.

Methods: This was a randomized open-label trial comparing patients receiving airway stent placement and standard medical treatment (intervention group) versus standard medical treatment alone (control group) for ECAC. At baseline, patients' respiratory symptoms, self-reported measures, and functional capabilities were assessed. Follow-up evaluations occurred 7 to 14 days postintervention, with an option for the control group to crossover to stent placement. Follow-up evaluations were repeated in the crossover patients.

Results: The study enrolled 17 patients in the control group [medical management (MM)] and 14 patients in the intervention group. At follow-up, 15 patients in the MM crossed over to the stent group, resulting in a total of 29 patients in the combined stent group (CSG). Subjectively (shortness of breath and cough), 45% of the CSG exhibited improvement with the intervention compared with just 12% in the MM. The modified St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score in the CSG improved significantly from 61.2 at baseline to 52.5 after stent placement (-8.7, P = 0.04). With intervention, the 6-minute walk test in CSG improved significantly from 364 meters to 398 meters (34 m, P < 0.01). The MM did not show a significant change in the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score or 6-minute walk test distance.

Conclusion: Short-term airway stent placement in patients with ECAC significantly improves respiratory symptoms, quality of life, and exercise capacity.

Background: The ION system is a shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (SS-RAB) platform developed to biopsy peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). There is a lack of data describing the use of this system in the Chinese population. The study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of using SS-RAB to diagnose PPNs across multiple centers within China.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter study used SS-RAB in consecutive patients with solid or sub-solid PPNs 8 to 30 mm in largest diameter. Primary endpoints were diagnostic yield and the rates of procedure- or device-related complications. Radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) was to confirm lesion localization, followed by sampling, using the Flexision biopsy needle, biopsy forceps, and cytology brush. Subjects with nonmalignant index biopsy results were followed up to 6 months.

Results: A total of 90 PPNs were biopsied from 90 subjects across 3 centers using SS-RAB. The median nodule size was 19.4 mm (IQR: 19.3, 24.6) in the largest dimension. In all (100%) cases, the catheter successfully reached the target nodule with tissue samples obtained. The diagnostic yield was 87.8% with a sensitivity for malignancy of 87.7% (71/81). In a univariate analysis, nodule lobar location, presence of bronchus sign, and rEBUS view were associated with a diagnostic sample, but only rEBUS view showed an association in a multivariate analysis. The overall pneumothorax rate was 1.1% without pneumothorax requiring intervention, and there was no periprocedural bleeding.

Conclusion: As an emerging technology in the Chinese population, SS-RAB can safely biopsy PPNs with strong diagnostic performance.