Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology最新文献

Objectives: Bipolar disorder (BD) in adolescence often associates with risky conducts, nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), and suicidal ideation. Lithium salts represent the first-line choice for BD in youth to manage manic symptoms and prevent both manic and depressive relapses. Our study aimed to assess efficacy and tolerability of extended-release lithium sulfate (ERLS) in youths with BD. Methods: A longitudinal perspective intervention study was thus conducted on a single cohort of 36 patients with BD aged 12-17 years treated with ERLS and followed up for 1 year. ERLS was titrated up to reach optimal plasma concentrations during the 3 months before baseline visit (T0). Then, patients underwent five follow-up visits after 1, 2, 3, 5, and 11 months and were administered with a battery of self- and parent-rated questionnaires and interviews to evaluate, at each timepoint, ERLS-related side effects, manic and depressive symptoms, emotional dysregulation (ED), NSSI and suicidality, and aggressiveness. Regular clinical assessments were also conducted, as well as blood tests, urinalysis, and EKG. Regression models were applied to examine the time course of outcome variables. Results: Twenty-four patients completed the follow-up. Regressions showed a significant reduction of most dependent variables included in the models, including depressive symptoms (β = -0.0006; adj-p = 0.0007), aggressiveness (β = -0.0031; adj-p < 0.0001), ED (β = -0.0002; adj-p = 0.0497), and unstructured suicidal ideation (β = -0.0058; adj-p = 0.0340). Fine distal tremor, increased thirst, and diuresis were among the most frequently reported side effects. Conclusions: Findings from the present study support the use of ERLS as an effective and well-tolerated agent for the management of BD in youth, with a beneficial effect on associated severe symptoms, including NSSI and suicidality.

Objectives: Recent survey data suggest that a high proportion of patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) experience pain, yet pain features in TS have not been previously investigated in a systematic manner. This article reviews the current understanding and impact of pain in TS as well as identifies possible areas for emphasis for future research on pain in TS. Methods: Using a comprehensive search strategy in two relevant research databases (PubMed and Scopus), we searched for relevant peer-reviewed, primary research articles, and review articles. Search terms used were Tourette syndrome, tic disorder, pain, pain management, sensory, and sensory gating. Results: A total of 116 pertinent articles were identified. Pain is reported by 47%-60% of individuals with TS and may relate to different aspects of tic phenomenology or other causes. Pain is more prevalent among TS patients than in the general population and negatively impacts quality of life. To standardize future research efforts, we propose the following classification: tic-related immediate pain, tic-related delayed injury/pain, suppression-related pain, premonitory urge-related pain, and associated primary pain syndromes. Altered sensory gating and interoceptive processing abnormalities are possible mechanisms contributing to pain in TS but warrant further study. Despite pain prevalence, most TS clinical rating scales and outcome measures used in therapeutic studies do not incorporate sufficient information regarding pain. Therapies known to improve pain in non-TS conditions that are also reported to improve tics have not been investigated for their effects on pain among TS patients. Conclusion: TS can be associated with a chronic pain syndrome that negatively affects quality of life. Future research using a systematic framework is needed to better understand pain cause(s) and prevalence, develop appropriate assessment methods, establish outcome measures, and understand mechanisms of pain in TS. Such investigations are likely to lead to therapeutic options for this troublesome symptom.

Objective: The incidence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a rare, potentially fatal adverse effect of antipsychotics, among children and youth is unknown. This cohort study estimated NMS incidence in antipsychotic users age 5-24 years and described its variation according to patient and antipsychotic characteristics. Methods: We used national Medicaid data (2004-2013) to identify patients beginning antipsychotic treatment and calculated the incidence of NMS during antipsychotic current use. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) assessed the independent contribution of patient and antipsychotic characteristics to NMS risk. Results: The 1,032,084 patients had 131 NMS cases during 1,472,558 person-years of antipsychotic current use, or 8.9 per 100,000 person-years. The following five factors independently predicted increased incidence: age 18-24 years (HR [95% CI] = 2.45 [1.65-3.63]), schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (HR = 5.86 [3.16-10.88]), neurodevelopmental disorders (HR = 7.11 [4.02-12.56]), antipsychotic dose >200mg chlorpromazine-equivalents (HR = 1.71 [1.15-2.54]), and first-generation antipsychotics (HR = 4.32 [2.74-6.82]). NMS incidence per 100,000 person-years increased from 1.8 (1.1-3.0) for those with none of these factors to 198.1 (132.8-295.6) for those with 4 or 5 factors. Findings were essentially unchanged in sensitivity analyses that restricted the study data to second-generation antipsychotics, children age 5-17 years, and the 5 most recent calendar years. Conclusion: In children and youth treated with antipsychotics, five factors independently identified patients with increased NMS incidence: age 18-24 years, schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, first-generation drugs, and antipsychotic doses greater than 200 mg chlorpromazine-equivalents. Patients with 4 or 5 of these factors had more than 100 times the incidence of those with none. These findings could improve early identification of children and youth with elevated NMS risk, potentially leading to earlier detection and improved outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with a dual diagnosis of persistent tic disorders or Tourette disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (TD + ADHD). Methods: We searched CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Sciences, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP up to September 2023 to identify double-blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological interventions for children and adolescents with TD + ADHD. Outcomes were change in ADHD symptoms (primary) and tics (secondary) severity. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated and pooled in random-effects network meta-analysis. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework was adopted to determine certainty of evidence. Results: We included 8 RCTs involving 575 participants. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that α2 agonists (SMD, 95% confidence interval [CI] ADHD: -0.72 [-1.13 to -0.31]; TD: -0.70 [-0.96 to -0.45]) and stimulants + α2 agonists (ADHD: -0.84 [-1.54 to -0.13]; TD: -0.60 [-1.04 to -0.17]) were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms and tics severity. Stimulants alone were more efficacious than placebo for ADHD symptoms severity only, but they did not worsen tics (ADHD: -0.54 [-1.05 to -0.03]; TD: -0.22 [-0.49 to 0.05]). There were no significant differences between any pairs of medications that were found efficacious against placebo for ADHD symptoms or tics severity. Certainty in the evidence varied from low to very low. Conclusions: Stimulants are efficacious for ADHD symptoms severity and do not increase tics severity in TD + ADHD. α2 agonists are efficacious for both ADHD symptoms and tics severity in TD + ADHD. These findings should inform guidelines and help guide shared decision-making to choose a medication for children with TD + ADHD.

Objective: To compare the proportion of children and adolescents with incident psychotropic medication use from 2019 through 2022. Methods: This cross-sectional study used the IQVIA PharMetrics^® Plus for Academics health plan claims database. Our study sample consisted of children and adolescents ages 6-18 who had at least one psychotropic medication in March 2019-February 2022. We examined psychotropic medication use in three distinct study periods: pre-pandemic (March 2019 to February 2020), pandemic-year-1 (March 2020-February 2021), and pandemic-year-2 (March 2021-February 2022). Incident use was defined as no evidence of psychotropic medication in the 12 months preceding the child and adolescent's first psychotropic dispensing in each study period. We estimated incident psychotropic use in the three study periods. Average marginal effects tested for significant differences in psychotropic initiation, overall and stratified by age and sex. Results: In our sample of 42,346 children and adolescents who were dispensed any psychotropic medication during the study period, incident psychotropic users were 27.8% in pre-pandemic, 26.0% in pandemic-year-1, and 27.8% in pandemic-year-2. Incident use of antidepressants was 51.4% in pandemic-year-1 and 54.6% in pandemic-year-2. The probability of incident psychotropic use was 2.4% lower in pandemic-year-1 than in the pre-pandemic year (p < 0.001). The proportion of 6-11-year-olds and females initiating a psychotropic was higher in pandemic-year-2 than pre-pandemic. Conclusion: Incident psychotropic use was most notable in younger and female children 2 years after the pandemic onset.

Introduction: It is essential not to delay behavior management and control for aggression, violence, and impulsive behavior in young people. Clozapine has been widely used in adolescents and adults to manage violence and aggression in Schizophrenia. However, there are limited data on the use of clozapine in children, and no systematic review has addressed its use in this population. Objective and Methods: To better understand the conditions under which clozapine is used as a therapeutic alternative for nonschizophrenic diagnoses and to assess the current evidence supporting its prescription to children, a systematic review was conducted. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO under the ID CRD42024537707. Results: The review identified that all the studies used clozapine to address externalizing behavior, particularly aggressive behavior, and found positive outcomes supporting its use for treating children with treatment-resistant aggression. The studies also found that clozapine was well-tolerated in all cases. However, the studies were limited and mainly consisted of open trials without a control group. Conclusion: Further high-quality research is needed to establish precise guidelines for using clozapine in children.

Introduction: Hyperactive catatonia is often unrecognized in pediatric patients due to its clinical heterogeneity, though it is often seen in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, especially autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Emerging evidence implicates hyperactive catatonia in more cases of self-injury and aggression in ASD than previously thought. Objectives: The study seeks to describe cases of hyperactive catatonia in SYNGAP-1 mutation and examine existing literature for symptomatic overlap between previously-described clinical and behavioral phenotypes of individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations and catatonia. Methods: The study describes two cases of an adolescent and a young adult with SYNGAP-1 mutation and ASD presenting with hyperactive catatonia, which are the first reports of catatonia in individuals known to have a pathogenic variant in SYNGAP-1. A systematic review was undertaken during which 101 articles were screened. 13 articles were then examined for neurological and behavioral features present in participants with SYNGAP-1 mutations which are seen in catatonia. Results: The systematic review demonstrates that clinical features suggestive of catatonia are frequently seen among individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations, including verbal impairment, psychomotor symptoms, aggression, oral aversion, and incontinence. These features were also present in the cases of catatonia in SYNGAP-1 mutations presented here. Both patients showed clinical improvement with use of a long-acting benzodiazepine, and one patient showed benefit from electroconvulsive therapy. Conclusions: This symptomatic overlap revealed in the systematic review, including symptoms seen in the reported cases, raises the possibility that diagnoses of catatonia may have been missed in the past in individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations. Self-injurious behavior and aggression, which are hallmarks of hyperactive catatonia, are commonly part of the behavioral phenotype of SYNGAP-1-related disorders. Clinicians should consider catatonia as a cause of such symptoms in individuals with SYNGAP-1 mutations, as effective treatment can result in significant improvement in safety and quality of life.