首页 > 最新文献

Immigration & Asylum Law最新文献

英文 中文
4. Freedom of movement for EU nationals 4. 欧盟国民的行动自由
Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0004
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter discusses the law which governs the free movement of people within the EU. As such, it is principally about the movement of EU nationals. The movement of non-EU nationals, known in European law as third-country nationals, may come within the ambit of EU law due to their connection with EU nationals, for instance as a spouse, family member, or employee. The chapter concentrates on the rights of EU nationals and their families to move within the EU, and covers the powers to deport or remove EU nationals. It also considers the possible impacts of Brexit on free movement rights.
本章讨论管理欧盟内部人员自由流动的法律。因此,它主要是关于欧盟国民的流动。非欧盟国民的流动,在欧洲法律中被称为第三国国民,可能会受到欧盟法律的管辖,因为他们与欧盟国民有联系,例如作为配偶、家庭成员或雇员。这一章的重点是欧盟国民及其家人在欧盟内部流动的权利,并涵盖了驱逐或遣返欧盟国民的权力。它还考虑了英国脱欧对自由流动权利可能产生的影响。
{"title":"4. Freedom of movement for EU nationals","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the law which governs the free movement of people within the EU. As such, it is principally about the movement of EU nationals. The movement of non-EU nationals, known in European law as third-country nationals, may come within the ambit of EU law due to their connection with EU nationals, for instance as a spouse, family member, or employee. The chapter concentrates on the rights of EU nationals and their families to move within the EU, and covers the powers to deport or remove EU nationals. It also considers the possible impacts of Brexit on free movement rights.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121760688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2. Policy, politics, and the media 2. 政策、政治和媒体
Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/HE/9780198815211.003.0002
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter introduces some of the policy issues which shape immigration law. It discusses migration policy in a global context; the institutional basis of immigration control; electronic borders; current drivers of UK policy, including security and economic migration; control within the borders, including the hostile environment policy; treatment of asylum seekers; the refugee crisis; and the role of the media. The chapter touches on the scrutiny of immigration functions by the Parliamentary Home Affairs Select Committee and the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration. There is a short discussion of the ambivalence of UK immigration policy towards economic migration.
本章介绍了影响移民法的一些政策问题。它讨论了全球背景下的移民政策;移民管制的制度基础;电子边界;英国政策的当前驱动因素,包括安全和经济移民;境内管制,包括敌对环境政策;寻求庇护者的待遇;难民危机;以及媒体的作用。本章涉及议会内政特别委员会和边境与移民独立首席检查员对移民职能的审查。关于英国移民政策对经济移民的矛盾心理,有一段简短的讨论。
{"title":"2. Policy, politics, and the media","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198815211.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198815211.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces some of the policy issues which shape immigration law. It discusses migration policy in a global context; the institutional basis of immigration control; electronic borders; current drivers of UK policy, including security and economic migration; control within the borders, including the hostile environment policy; treatment of asylum seekers; the refugee crisis; and the role of the media. The chapter touches on the scrutiny of immigration functions by the Parliamentary Home Affairs Select Committee and the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration. There is a short discussion of the ambivalence of UK immigration policy towards economic migration.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"37 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129374955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
3. Nationality, citizenship, and right of abode 3.国籍、公民身份和居留权
Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0003
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter considers the bases of nationality and citizenship, and traces the development of British nationality law, focusing on changes from 1948 to the present day. It looks at the effects of these changes on particular groups of people, characterised to a significant extent by progressive exclusion. It considers the fundamental incident of citizenship and the right to live in one’s own country, both as to the interaction of nationality and immigration law and as to the overall effect of full inclusion as a citizen. The bases for obtaining British nationality by registration and naturalisation are discussed, as are the powers of deprivation of citizenship. The possibility of asserting rights as a stateless person is also noted.
本章考虑国籍和公民权的基础,并追溯英国国籍法的发展,重点关注1948年至今的变化。它着眼于这些变化对特定人群的影响,在很大程度上以渐进排斥为特征。它考虑了公民身份和在自己国家生活的权利的基本事件,既涉及国籍法和移民法的相互作用,也涉及作为公民完全融入社会的总体影响。讨论了通过登记和归化获得英国国籍的依据,以及剥夺公民身份的权力。还指出了作为无国籍人主张权利的可能性。
{"title":"3. Nationality, citizenship, and right of abode","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the bases of nationality and citizenship, and traces the development of British nationality law, focusing on changes from 1948 to the present day. It looks at the effects of these changes on particular groups of people, characterised to a significant extent by progressive exclusion. It considers the fundamental incident of citizenship and the right to live in one’s own country, both as to the interaction of nationality and immigration law and as to the overall effect of full inclusion as a citizen. The bases for obtaining British nationality by registration and naturalisation are discussed, as are the powers of deprivation of citizenship. The possibility of asserting rights as a stateless person is also noted.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116963239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
16. Removal 16. 删除
Pub Date : 2018-08-02 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0016
Gina Clayton, Georgina Firth, Caroline Sawyer, Rowena Moffatt
This chapter describes the development of the grounds in law for exercising the power to remove a person from the UK, from Immigration Act 1971 to Immigration Act 2014. These include people who have overstayed the limit of their leave or have breached conditions of leave or obtained leave to remain by deception, and the families of such people. The Immigration Act 2014 s 1 abolished the historic distinction between overstayers and illegal entrants and replaced a number of separate powers with a single power to remove a person who requires leave to enter or remain in the UK but does not have it. The chapter also examines the practical obstacles to removal. These are often as important to the individual as the legal ones.
本章描述了从1971年《移民法》到2014年《移民法》,行使将某人驱逐出英国的权力的法律依据的发展。这些人包括逾期居留或违反居留条件或以欺骗手段获得居留许可的人,以及这些人的家属。《2014年移民法》第1条废除了逾期居留者和非法入境者之间的历史区别,并将一些独立的权力取代为一个单一的权力,可以将需要入境或留在英国但没有签证的人驱逐出境。本章还探讨了去除的实际障碍。对个人来说,这些通常和法律条款一样重要。
{"title":"16. Removal","authors":"Gina Clayton, Georgina Firth, Caroline Sawyer, Rowena Moffatt","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0016","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the development of the grounds in law for exercising the power to remove a person from the UK, from Immigration Act 1971 to Immigration Act 2014. These include people who have overstayed the limit of their leave or have breached conditions of leave or obtained leave to remain by deception, and the families of such people. The Immigration Act 2014 s 1 abolished the historic distinction between overstayers and illegal entrants and replaced a number of separate powers with a single power to remove a person who requires leave to enter or remain in the UK but does not have it. The chapter also examines the practical obstacles to removal. These are often as important to the individual as the legal ones.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125843562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
15. Deportation 15. 驱逐出境
Pub Date : 2018-08-02 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0015
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on series provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. This chapter gives a brief history of the power of deportation. It then discusses in some detail the application of the ground that the deportation is conducive to the public good. This includes discussion of so-called automatic deportation under the UK Borders Act 2007, and of national security cases. The chapter also covers the Immigration Act 2014 provisions relating to deportation, including compulsory considerations for decision-makers and the power to ‘deport first appeal later’. The new case law on these provisions is also covered.
课程集中和全面,系列教科书提供了法律课程关键领域的可访问概述。本章简要介绍驱逐出境权的历史。然后详细讨论了驱逐出境有利于公共利益这一理由的适用。这包括根据《2007年英国边境法案》(UK Borders Act 2007)讨论所谓的自动驱逐出境,以及国家安全案件。本章还涵盖了《2014年移民法》有关驱逐出境的规定,包括对决策者的强制性考虑和“先驱逐后上诉”的权力。关于这些条款的新判例法也包括在内。
{"title":"15. Deportation","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0015","url":null,"abstract":"Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on series provides an accessible overview of the key areas on the law curriculum. This chapter gives a brief history of the power of deportation. It then discusses in some detail the application of the ground that the deportation is conducive to the public good. This includes discussion of so-called automatic deportation under the UK Borders Act 2007, and of national security cases. The chapter also covers the Immigration Act 2014 provisions relating to deportation, including compulsory considerations for decision-makers and the power to ‘deport first appeal later’. The new case law on these provisions is also covered.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123815884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
14. Detention 14. 拘留
Pub Date : 2018-08-02 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0014
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt
This chapter focuses on the issue of immigration detention. The deprivation of liberty is one of the most serious infringements of fundamental human rights. In immigration law, individuals lose their liberty through the exercise of a statutory discretion by the Home Office or immigration officers. The chapter considers the statutory powers and executive guidelines, together with human rights and common law rules. The use of detention is an increasingly common phenomenon in the asylum process, and the key role of immigration bail is examined. The former use of indefinite detention for foreign terrorist suspects is discussed at the end of the chapter.
本章主要讨论移民拘留问题。剥夺自由是对基本人权最严重的侵犯之一。在移民法中,个人因内政部或移民官员行使法定裁量权而失去自由。这一章讨论了法定权力和行政准则,以及人权和普通法规则。在庇护程序中使用拘留是一种日益普遍的现象,并审查了移民保释的关键作用。本章最后讨论了前者对外国恐怖主义嫌疑人使用无限期拘留的问题。
{"title":"14. Detention","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198815211.003.0014","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on the issue of immigration detention. The deprivation of liberty is one of the most serious infringements of fundamental human rights. In immigration law, individuals lose their liberty through the exercise of a statutory discretion by the Home Office or immigration officers. The chapter considers the statutory powers and executive guidelines, together with human rights and common law rules. The use of detention is an increasingly common phenomenon in the asylum process, and the key role of immigration bail is examined. The former use of indefinite detention for foreign terrorist suspects is discussed at the end of the chapter.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129178012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
11. The asylum process 11. 庇护程序
Pub Date : 2016-07-21 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198747550.003.0011
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter describes the asylum process from application through to the cessation of refugee status. The first two sections deal with entering the UK to claim asylum, and with the asylum application and decision-making, while the third explores the different routes through which an asylum claim can be processed, including ‘safe’ country of origin provisions and non-suspensive appeals, and returns to third countries pursuant to the Dublin Regulation. The fourth section concerns penalties connected with seeking asylum. The final sections cover remedies for the victims of trafficking, and other procedures after appeal rights are exhausted, or asylum has been granted.
本章描述了从申请到终止难民身份的庇护程序。前两部分涉及进入英国申请庇护,以及庇护申请和决策,而第三部分探讨了可以处理庇护申请的不同途径,包括“安全”原籍国规定和非暂停上诉,以及根据都柏林条例返回第三国。第四节涉及与寻求庇护有关的惩罚。最后几节涉及贩运受害者的补救办法,以及用尽上诉权利或获得庇护后的其他程序。
{"title":"11. The asylum process","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198747550.003.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198747550.003.0011","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the asylum process from application through to the cessation of refugee status. The first two sections deal with entering the UK to claim asylum, and with the asylum application and decision-making, while the third explores the different routes through which an asylum claim can be processed, including ‘safe’ country of origin provisions and non-suspensive appeals, and returns to third countries pursuant to the Dublin Regulation. The fourth section concerns penalties connected with seeking asylum. The final sections cover remedies for the victims of trafficking, and other procedures after appeal rights are exhausted, or asylum has been granted.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133729842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
5. Immigration law and human rights 5. 移民法和人权
Pub Date : 2016-07-21 DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198747550.003.0005
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter discusses human rights law as it affects immigration and asylum. It explains how human rights apply to decisions on entry and removal, and the extraterritorial application of Article 3, and its nature as an absolute right. The chapter discusses Article 8, and how the proportionality test is applied to removal decisions in particular. It considers the effect on Article 8 cases of the immigration rules, the Immigration Act 2014, and case law interpreting the relationship between the rules, statute, and human rights. It briefly covers other Articles, including recent cases on Article 10. It also refers to the interaction of human rights with the duty in s 55 Borders Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 to have regard to children’s welfare.
本章讨论影响移民和庇护的人权法。它解释了人权如何适用于入境和出境的决定,以及第3条的域外适用,以及人权作为一项绝对权利的性质。本章讨论了第8条,以及比例检验如何特别适用于撤职决定。它考虑了对移民规则第8条案例的影响,2014年移民法,以及解释规则、法规和人权之间关系的判例法。它简要介绍了其他条款,包括最近关于第10条的案例。它还提到人权与《2009年边界公民身份和移民法》第55条关于儿童福利的义务之间的相互作用。
{"title":"5. Immigration law and human rights","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198747550.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198747550.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses human rights law as it affects immigration and asylum. It explains how human rights apply to decisions on entry and removal, and the extraterritorial application of Article 3, and its nature as an absolute right. The chapter discusses Article 8, and how the proportionality test is applied to removal decisions in particular. It considers the effect on Article 8 cases of the immigration rules, the Immigration Act 2014, and case law interpreting the relationship between the rules, statute, and human rights. It briefly covers other Articles, including recent cases on Article 10. It also refers to the interaction of human rights with the duty in s 55 Borders Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 to have regard to children’s welfare.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123831442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
7. Challenging decisions: appeals, administrative and judicial review 7. 挑战决定:上诉、行政和司法审查
Pub Date : 2016-07-21 DOI: 10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0007
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter discusses the development of the current structure of the appeals bodies—the Appeal Tribunal and the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC)—and their procedure. It sets out the limited rights of appeal following the implementation of the Immigration Act 2014. It has sections on administrative review and judicial review. The chapter also considers whether there is a right to a fair hearing in immigration and asylum decisions. It concludes with a section on immigrants and asylum seekers’ access to legal representation, including funding.
本章讨论上诉机构——上诉审裁处和特别移民上诉委员会(SIAC)——目前结构的发展及其程序。它规定了2014年《移民法》实施后的有限上诉权。它分为行政审查和司法审查两部分。本章还讨论了在移民和庇护决定中是否有公平听证的权利。报告最后有一节是关于移民和寻求庇护者获得法律代理的机会,包括资金。
{"title":"7. Challenging decisions: appeals, administrative and judicial review","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the development of the current structure of the appeals bodies—the Appeal Tribunal and the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC)—and their procedure. It sets out the limited rights of appeal following the implementation of the Immigration Act 2014. It has sections on administrative review and judicial review. The chapter also considers whether there is a right to a fair hearing in immigration and asylum decisions. It concludes with a section on immigrants and asylum seekers’ access to legal representation, including funding.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124081626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
13. Exclusion from asylum 13. 不受庇护
Pub Date : 2016-07-21 DOI: 10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0013
G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray
This chapter considers the provisions whereby an individual can be excluded from refugee status because of their conduct. These are as laid down in the Refugee Convention and the EC Qualification Directive. These powers were little used in the twentieth century, but now are used increasingly often in the context of the escalation in international action against terrorism. Their interpretation and application are affected by domestic legislation, in the UK, the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, and the Terrorism Acts of 2000 and 2006, and draw on international criminal law. The chapter discusses up-to-date case law on exclusion from refugee status based on crimes against humanity, serious non-political crimes, and acts against the purpose and principles of the United Nations. It deals with the issue of complicity and the relationship with the UK’s anti-terrorism legislation. It also deals with the situations in which refugees can be removed from the host country.
本章审议了个人可因其行为而被排除在难民地位之外的规定。这些是《难民公约》和《欧共体资格指令》所规定的。这些权力在20世纪很少使用,但现在越来越多地在国际反恐行动升级的背景下使用。他们的解释和适用受到国内立法的影响,在英国,2002年的《国籍移民和庇护法》,2006年的《移民庇护和国籍法》,2000年和2006年的《恐怖主义法》,并借鉴了国际刑法。本章讨论了基于危害人类罪、严重非政治性罪行和违反联合国宗旨和原则的行为而排除难民地位的最新判例法。它涉及共谋问题以及与英国反恐立法的关系。它还处理难民可以从东道国被驱逐的情况。
{"title":"13. Exclusion from asylum","authors":"G. Clayton, G. Firth, C. Sawyer, R. Moffatt, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198747550.003.0013","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the provisions whereby an individual can be excluded from refugee status because of their conduct. These are as laid down in the Refugee Convention and the EC Qualification Directive. These powers were little used in the twentieth century, but now are used increasingly often in the context of the escalation in international action against terrorism. Their interpretation and application are affected by domestic legislation, in the UK, the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, and the Terrorism Acts of 2000 and 2006, and draw on international criminal law. The chapter discusses up-to-date case law on exclusion from refugee status based on crimes against humanity, serious non-political crimes, and acts against the purpose and principles of the United Nations. It deals with the issue of complicity and the relationship with the UK’s anti-terrorism legislation. It also deals with the situations in which refugees can be removed from the host country.","PeriodicalId":152948,"journal":{"name":"Immigration & Asylum Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114939386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Immigration & Asylum Law
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1