Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-04DOI: 10.57264/cer-2025-0150
Manuel Cossio, Ramiro E Gilardino
Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) has progressed from best practice to policy requirement, yet communication barriers persist. This perspective explores how plain language summaries (PLSs) and summaries of information for patients (SIPs) can enhance equity and transparency in HTA. Building on recent European regulatory developments and emerging research, it discusses the balance between accessibility, quality and feasibility. Generative artificial intelligence offers the potential to scale PLS and SIP production, but its responsible integration requires oversight, collaboration and a continued focus on equity and patient-centeredness within evolving HTA frameworks.
{"title":"Bridging the patient gap: exploring generative AI to support meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment.","authors":"Manuel Cossio, Ramiro E Gilardino","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0150","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) has progressed from best practice to policy requirement, yet communication barriers persist. This perspective explores how plain language summaries (PLSs) and summaries of information for patients (SIPs) can enhance equity and transparency in HTA. Building on recent European regulatory developments and emerging research, it discusses the balance between accessibility, quality and feasibility. Generative artificial intelligence offers the potential to scale PLS and SIP production, but its responsible integration requires oversight, collaboration and a continued focus on equity and patient-centeredness within evolving HTA frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145438239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-20DOI: 10.57264/cer-2025-0045
Christopher Ngai, Mit Patel, Agnieszka Kopiec, Shuai Fu, Noemi Hummel
Aim: We compared the effects of nefecon, an oral targeted-release budesonide formulation, and sparsentan, an oral, dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonist, on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, a leading cause of chronic kidney disease. Materials & methods: We conducted an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using patient-level data from NefIgArd (NCT03643965; n = 364), a randomized (1:1) trial of nefecon plus optimized renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) therapy versus placebo plus RASi; and aggregate data from PROTECT (NCT03762850; n = 404), a randomized (1:1) trial of sparsentan versus irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker. Mean absolute eGFR change and mean relative urine protein-to-creatinine and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio changes from baseline at 9, 12 and 24 months (NefIgArd) or 36, 48 and 106 weeks (PROTECT) were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. A composite outcome (time to confirmed 40% eGFR reduction, end-stage kidney disease or all-cause mortality) was also included. An unanchored MAIC and network meta-analysis were used as sensitivity analyses. Results: The matching process reduced the effective sample for the NefIgArd trial from 364 to 208. Absolute eGFR change significantly favored nefecon over sparsentan at 9 months (mean difference, ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% credible interval]: 5.7 [3.1-8.2]), 12 months (3.5 [1.0-6.0]) and 24 months (3.3 [0.0-6.5]). Differences in other outcomes were generally not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis results were consistent with the main findings. Conclusion: In patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, nefecon plus optimized RASi may preserve kidney function to a greater extent than sparsentan.
目的:我们比较了口服靶向释放布地奈德制剂nefecon和口服双重内皮素-血管紧张素受体拮抗剂sparsentan对免疫球蛋白A肾病患者肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的影响,免疫球蛋白A肾病是慢性肾病的主要原因。材料和方法:我们使用NefIgArd (NCT03643965; n = 364)的患者水平数据进行了锚定匹配调整间接比较(MAIC),这是一项随机(1:1)试验,nefecon加优化肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)治疗与安慰剂加RASi治疗;并汇总了来自PROTECT (NCT03762850; n = 404)的数据,这是一项随机(1:1)的斯帕sentan与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂厄贝沙坦的试验。使用重复测量的混合效应模型分析9、12和24个月(NefIgArd)或36、48和106周(PROTECT)时平均绝对eGFR变化和平均相对尿蛋白与肌酐和尿白蛋白与肌酐比值的变化。综合结果(确认eGFR降低40%的时间,终末期肾脏疾病或全因死亡率)也包括在内。使用无锚定的MAIC和网络meta分析作为敏感性分析。结果:匹配过程将NefIgArd试验的有效样本从364个减少到208个。在9个月时,绝对eGFR变化明显有利于nefecon而不是sparsentan(平均差异,ml/min/1.73 m2[95%可信区间]:5.7[3.1-8.2]),12个月(3.5[1.0-6.0])和24个月(3.3[0.0-6.5])。其他结果的差异一般没有统计学意义。敏感性分析结果与主要研究结果一致。结论:在免疫球蛋白A肾病患者中,与sparsentan相比,nefecon联合优化的RASi可在更大程度上保护肾功能。
{"title":"Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of kidney function in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy treated with nefecon or sparsentan.","authors":"Christopher Ngai, Mit Patel, Agnieszka Kopiec, Shuai Fu, Noemi Hummel","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0045","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We compared the effects of nefecon, an oral targeted-release budesonide formulation, and sparsentan, an oral, dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonist, on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, a leading cause of chronic kidney disease. <b>Materials & methods:</b> We conducted an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using patient-level data from NefIgArd (NCT03643965; n = 364), a randomized (1:1) trial of nefecon plus optimized renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) therapy versus placebo plus RASi; and aggregate data from PROTECT (NCT03762850; n = 404), a randomized (1:1) trial of sparsentan versus irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker. Mean absolute eGFR change and mean relative urine protein-to-creatinine and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio changes from baseline at 9, 12 and 24 months (NefIgArd) or 36, 48 and 106 weeks (PROTECT) were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. A composite outcome (time to confirmed 40% eGFR reduction, end-stage kidney disease or all-cause mortality) was also included. An unanchored MAIC and network meta-analysis were used as sensitivity analyses. <b>Results:</b> The matching process reduced the effective sample for the NefIgArd trial from 364 to 208. Absolute eGFR change significantly favored nefecon over sparsentan at 9 months (mean difference, ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> [95% credible interval]: 5.7 [3.1-8.2]), 12 months (3.5 [1.0-6.0]) and 24 months (3.3 [0.0-6.5]). Differences in other outcomes were generally not statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis results were consistent with the main findings. <b>Conclusion:</b> In patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, nefecon plus optimized RASi may preserve kidney function to a greater extent than sparsentan.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679650/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145563691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: This 2023 online survey assessed the management of patients with iron deficiency anemia/iron deficiency without anemia (IDA/IDWA) in Italy. Materials & methods: The study used the patient's perspective to examine care pathways used to manage IDA/IDWA in Italy, to raise clinician awareness, improve patient care (earlier diagnosis, initiate appropriate treatment) and outcomes (reduce recurrence/progression). The survey questioned iron deficiency (ID) diagnoses of patients, their sources of information and influence, their knowledge of ID, perceptions and fears surrounding treatment, unmet needs and expectations, and underlying causes of treatment compliance and persistence. Results: Of the 404 respondents (102 males and 302 females) who completed the survey, all were aged between 18 and 80 years. Almost all respondents (97.0%) experienced ID symptoms, most frequently fatigue, weakness and tiredness (71.0% of the total cohort; 80.1% females vs 44.1% males); 76.8% of all respondents regarded symptoms as 'bothersome'. Most respondents (70.5%) consulted a physician as the first action to treat ID (79.8% females vs 43.1% males); general practitioners were the main healthcare providers, consulted by 55.6% of all respondents. Most respondents (94.1%) were aware of potential ID recurrence, and 75.0% reported recurrent ID episodes since their diagnosis. Satisfaction with ID treatment was rated as average (7-7.7/10); 56.4% of all respondents stayed on ID treatment for as long as prescribed, and 41.1% did not fully comply with tablet intake, primarily because they 'felt much better' (64.8%). Conclusion: This survey identified high rates of self-reported ID symptoms and recurrent ID episodes among respondents. It highlights the importance of increasing awareness of ID and its consequences among healthcare practitioners and individuals in the general population, of shortening the time before diagnosis, and ensuring that patients continue treatment for the prescribed duration to resaturate serum iron levels.
{"title":"Iron deficiency treatment pathway in Italy: patients' perceptions of diagnosis and treatment.","authors":"Ovidio Brignoli, Rose-Marie Carneiro, Cécile Fournier, Ettore Pinardi, Maurizio Serati","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0011","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This 2023 online survey assessed the management of patients with iron deficiency anemia/iron deficiency without anemia (IDA/IDWA) in Italy. <b>Materials & methods:</b> The study used the patient's perspective to examine care pathways used to manage IDA/IDWA in Italy, to raise clinician awareness, improve patient care (earlier diagnosis, initiate appropriate treatment) and outcomes (reduce recurrence/progression). The survey questioned iron deficiency (ID) diagnoses of patients, their sources of information and influence, their knowledge of ID, perceptions and fears surrounding treatment, unmet needs and expectations, and underlying causes of treatment compliance and persistence. <b>Results:</b> Of the 404 respondents (102 males and 302 females) who completed the survey, all were aged between 18 and 80 years. Almost all respondents (97.0%) experienced ID symptoms, most frequently fatigue, weakness and tiredness (71.0% of the total cohort; 80.1% females vs 44.1% males); 76.8% of all respondents regarded symptoms as 'bothersome'. Most respondents (70.5%) consulted a physician as the first action to treat ID (79.8% females vs 43.1% males); general practitioners were the main healthcare providers, consulted by 55.6% of all respondents. Most respondents (94.1%) were aware of potential ID recurrence, and 75.0% reported recurrent ID episodes since their diagnosis. Satisfaction with ID treatment was rated as average (7-7.7/10); 56.4% of all respondents stayed on ID treatment for as long as prescribed, and 41.1% did not fully comply with tablet intake, primarily because they 'felt much better' (64.8%). <b>Conclusion:</b> This survey identified high rates of self-reported ID symptoms and recurrent ID episodes among respondents. It highlights the importance of increasing awareness of ID and its consequences among healthcare practitioners and individuals in the general population, of shortening the time before diagnosis, and ensuring that patients continue treatment for the prescribed duration to resaturate serum iron levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679649/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145634409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of three major programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing assays in guiding immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China, and to provide empirical evidence on the selection of cost-effective diagnostics to support the immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy regimens for NSCLC patients. Materials & methods: From a healthcare system perspective, a decision tree model was constructed to simulate the cost and effectiveness of employing VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay, Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 assay, and Dako 22C3 antibody concentrate in advanced NSCLC patients in China. The cost-effectiveness of Ventana PD-L1 IHC SP263 assay compared with other testing methods was assessed through the incremental analysis. The robustness of the base case analysis results was validated by one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: The VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay, which can guide multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapies (e.g., atezolizumab and pembrolizumab) for advanced NSCLC patients, achieved a higher percentage of successfully diagnosed and treated, and a higher quality-adjusted life-year at a lower cost compared with Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 assay and Dako 22C3 antibody concentrate. The robustness of the base case results was confirmed by both one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: The VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay is cost-effective compared with Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 assay and Dako 22C3 antibody concentrate for the immunotherapy treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in China.
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of PD-L1 testing to guide immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.","authors":"Fei Zhou, Yuan Li, Jian Ming, Yingyao Chen, Caicun Zhou","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0093","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of three major programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing assays in guiding immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China, and to provide empirical evidence on the selection of cost-effective diagnostics to support the immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy regimens for NSCLC patients. <b>Materials & methods:</b> From a healthcare system perspective, a decision tree model was constructed to simulate the cost and effectiveness of employing VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay, Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 assay, and Dako 22C3 antibody concentrate in advanced NSCLC patients in China. The cost-effectiveness of Ventana PD-L1 IHC SP263 assay compared with other testing methods was assessed through the incremental analysis. The robustness of the base case analysis results was validated by one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. <b>Results:</b> The VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay, which can guide multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapies (e.g., atezolizumab and pembrolizumab) for advanced NSCLC patients, achieved a higher percentage of successfully diagnosed and treated, and a higher quality-adjusted life-year at a lower cost compared with Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 assay and Dako 22C3 antibody concentrate. The robustness of the base case results was confirmed by both one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> The VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay is cost-effective compared with Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 assay and Dako 22C3 antibody concentrate for the immunotherapy treatment for advanced NSCLC patients in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-30DOI: 10.57264/cer-2025-0107
Rocco Falchetto, Jasmin Barman-Aksözen
{"title":"Letter to the Editor - Qualitative evidence submitted by patients to NICE: need for more quality or unrealistic and unfair requirements?","authors":"Rocco Falchetto, Jasmin Barman-Aksözen","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0107","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145400929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-04DOI: 10.57264/cer-2025-0176
Sreeram V Ramagopalan, Annie Jullien Pannelay, Jo Atkins
In this update, we cover the evolving health technology assessment process in Australia and also examine how commercial health plans in the US influence patient access to treatments.
{"title":"Access in all areas? A round-up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 11.","authors":"Sreeram V Ramagopalan, Annie Jullien Pannelay, Jo Atkins","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0176","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this update, we cover the evolving health technology assessment process in Australia and also examine how commercial health plans in the US influence patient access to treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145438178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: Pimavanserin (PIM) is the only US FDA-approved atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) for the treatment for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). In addition to demonstrating symptom improvements in clinical trials, PIM appears to consistently show favorable outcomes among published real-world evidence (RWE) studies compared with off-label AAPs (e.g., quetiapine [QUE]). A comprehensive review of these RWE studies was conducted to summarize the overall benefits of PIM among PDP patients residing in community or nursing home/long-term care (NH/LTC) settings. Materials & methods: A literature review of published comparative RWE studies of PIM among PDP patients from 1 January 2017 to 1 April 2025 was conducted. Eligible studies examined the following outcomes in community and NH/LTC settings: clinical (e.g., falls, fractures), adherence (e.g., discontinuations), all-cause and psychiatric (psych)-related healthcare resource use (e.g., hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, office visits, etc.), and mortality. Results: Sixteen RWE studies of PIM versus other-AAPs or QUE and PIM nonusers were included for review. In these studies, PIM had 20-37% lower all-cause and psych-related hospitalizations, 7-15% lower ER visits, significant delays to LTC admissions, lower rates of falls or fractures in NH/LTC settings and lower observed rates of mortality versus other-AAPs. Similar results were found for PIM versus QUE. Conclusion: PDP patients initiating PIM versus other-AAPs or QUE were associated with lower all-cause and psychiatric healthcare resource use burden, longer community-stays and delayed NH/LTC admissions. Additionally, PIM was associated with higher treatment compliance, fewer falls or fractures and lower overall mortality risk versus other-AAPs or QUE. PIM's favorable real-world profile versus other-AAPs or QUE across community and NH/LTC settings complement the favorable clinical trial findings.
{"title":"Real-world evidence of pimavanserin utilization among patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis: a review of real-world data that augments data from randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Nazia Rashid, Ismaeel Yunusa, Dilesh Doshi, Vinod Yakkala, Daksha Gopal, Victor Abler, Krithika Rajagopalan","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0129","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Pimavanserin (PIM) is the only US FDA-approved atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) for the treatment for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). In addition to demonstrating symptom improvements in clinical trials, PIM appears to consistently show favorable outcomes among published real-world evidence (RWE) studies compared with off-label AAPs (e.g., quetiapine [QUE]). A comprehensive review of these RWE studies was conducted to summarize the overall benefits of PIM among PDP patients residing in community or nursing home/long-term care (NH/LTC) settings. <b>Materials & methods:</b> A literature review of published comparative RWE studies of PIM among PDP patients from 1 January 2017 to 1 April 2025 was conducted. Eligible studies examined the following outcomes in community and NH/LTC settings: clinical (e.g., falls, fractures), adherence (e.g., discontinuations), all-cause and psychiatric (psych)-related healthcare resource use (e.g., hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits, office visits, etc.), and mortality. <b>Results:</b> Sixteen RWE studies of PIM versus other-AAPs or QUE and PIM nonusers were included for review. In these studies, PIM had 20-37% lower all-cause and psych-related hospitalizations, 7-15% lower ER visits, significant delays to LTC admissions, lower rates of falls or fractures in NH/LTC settings and lower observed rates of mortality versus other-AAPs. Similar results were found for PIM versus QUE. <b>Conclusion:</b> PDP patients initiating PIM versus other-AAPs or QUE were associated with lower all-cause and psychiatric healthcare resource use burden, longer community-stays and delayed NH/LTC admissions. Additionally, PIM was associated with higher treatment compliance, fewer falls or fractures and lower overall mortality risk versus other-AAPs or QUE. PIM's favorable real-world profile versus other-AAPs or QUE across community and NH/LTC settings complement the favorable clinical trial findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145377743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.57264/cer-2025-0149
Paul Arora, Sreeram V Ramagopalan
In this update, we examine the growing potential of synthetic data in addressing data access challenges for health technology assessment. We explore studies evaluating synthetic data as external control arms in clinical trials and the application of synthetic data in health economic evaluation. Additionally, we review real-world evidence on the clinical impact of formulary restrictions in the US.
{"title":"R WE ready for reimbursement? A round-up of developments in real-world evidence relating to health technology assessment: part 22.","authors":"Paul Arora, Sreeram V Ramagopalan","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0149","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this update, we examine the growing potential of synthetic data in addressing data access challenges for health technology assessment. We explore studies evaluating synthetic data as external control arms in clinical trials and the application of synthetic data in health economic evaluation. Additionally, we review real-world evidence on the clinical impact of formulary restrictions in the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679658/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145301351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: To describe real-world adherence, treatment utilization, vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) and economic outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) with recurrent VOC treated with L-glutamine, voxelotor or crizanlizumab in the US. Materials & methods: In this retrospective study, patients with SCD with recurrent VOC who received L-glutamine, voxelotor, or crizanlizumab were identified from the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases between 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2022. Eligible patients had ≥12 months continuous enrollment before and after the first chronic therapy claim (i.e., index date). Number of VOC, treatment utilization, healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were summarized for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. The proportion of days covered (PDC; i.e., proxy for adherence) for the index chronic therapy was measured during the 12-month follow-up period. Results: Overall, 440 patients initiated a recently approved chronic therapy (L-glutamine, n = 254; voxelotor, n = 110; crizanlizumab, n = 76) and met inclusion criteria. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of VOC during baseline and follow-up were similar for patients treated with any index therapy (n = 440; 7.21 [8.82] vs 7.27 [9.85]); this was similar across patients treated with L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor, respectively. Mean (SD) PDC for patients with any index therapy was 0.37 (0.29); results were similar across patients treated with L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor. Healthcare resource utilization during the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods were comparable. Mean (SD) total costs for patients initiating a recently approved chronic therapy increased by ∼50% or $38,111 during follow-up (follow-up, $118,235 [$177,125]; baseline, $80,125 [$120,950]; p < 0.001); most of the increased costs ($27,108 [71.1%]) were a direct result of recently approved chronic therapies. Conclusion: Patients initiated on L-glutamine, voxelotor or crizanlizumab had low adherence (based on PDC), continued to experience frequent VOC, and incurred higher healthcare costs mostly due to the costs of these therapies. This highlights the need for additional treatment options for patients with SCD with recurrent VOC.
目的:描述在美国使用l-谷氨酰胺、voxelotor或crizanlizumab治疗的镰状细胞病(SCD)复发性VOC患者的现实依从性、治疗利用率、血管闭塞危像(VOC)和经济结果。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,2015年1月1日至2022年9月30日期间,从Merative™MarketScan®研究数据库中确定了接受l -谷氨酰胺、voxelotor或crizanlizumab治疗的复发性VOC的SCD患者。符合条件的患者在首次慢性治疗声明(即索引日期)前后连续入组≥12个月。总结指标日期之前(基线)和之后(随访)12个月的VOC数量、治疗利用率、医疗资源利用率和医疗费用。在12个月的随访期间测量慢性治疗指标的覆盖天数比例(PDC,即依从性的替代指标)。结果:总体而言,440名患者开始了最近批准的慢性治疗(l -谷氨酰胺,n = 254; voxelotor, n = 110; crizanlizumab, n = 76),符合纳入标准。接受任何指数治疗的患者在基线和随访期间VOC的平均值(标准差[SD])相似(n = 440; 7.21 [8.82] vs 7.27 [9.85]);这在分别使用l -谷氨酰胺、克里赞单抗和voxelotor治疗的患者中是相似的。任何指标治疗的患者的平均(SD) PDC为0.37 (0.29);在接受l -谷氨酰胺、克里赞单抗和voxelotor治疗的患者中,结果相似。12个月基线期和随访期的医疗资源利用情况具有可比性。在随访期间,启动最近批准的慢性治疗的患者的平均(SD)总成本增加了约50%或38,111美元(随访,118,235美元[177,125美元];基线,80,125美元[120,950美元]);p结论:开始使用l -谷氨酰胺,voxelotor或crizanlizumab的患者依从性低(基于PDC),继续经历频繁的VOC,并且主要由于这些治疗的成本而产生更高的医疗费用。这突出了对复发性挥发性有机化合物的SCD患者需要额外的治疗选择。
{"title":"Adherence, treatment utilization, clinical and economic outcomes of patients with sickle cell disease with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises treated with recently approved chronic therapies in the US.","authors":"Chuka Udeze, Michelle Jerry, Kristin Evans, Nanxin Li, Siddharth Jain, Biree Andemariam","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0232","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2024-0232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To describe real-world adherence, treatment utilization, vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) and economic outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) with recurrent VOC treated with L-glutamine, voxelotor or crizanlizumab in the US. <b>Materials & methods:</b> In this retrospective study, patients with SCD with recurrent VOC who received L-glutamine, voxelotor, or crizanlizumab were identified from the Merative™ MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Research Databases between 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2022. Eligible patients had ≥12 months continuous enrollment before and after the first chronic therapy claim (i.e., index date). Number of VOC, treatment utilization, healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were summarized for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. The proportion of days covered (PDC; i.e., proxy for adherence) for the index chronic therapy was measured during the 12-month follow-up period. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 440 patients initiated a recently approved chronic therapy (L-glutamine, n = 254; voxelotor, n = 110; crizanlizumab, n = 76) and met inclusion criteria. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of VOC during baseline and follow-up were similar for patients treated with any index therapy (n = 440; 7.21 [8.82] vs 7.27 [9.85]); this was similar across patients treated with L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor, respectively. Mean (SD) PDC for patients with any index therapy was 0.37 (0.29); results were similar across patients treated with L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and voxelotor. Healthcare resource utilization during the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods were comparable. Mean (SD) total costs for patients initiating a recently approved chronic therapy increased by ∼50% or $38,111 during follow-up (follow-up, $118,235 [$177,125]; baseline, $80,125 [$120,950]; p < 0.001); most of the increased costs ($27,108 [71.1%]) were a direct result of recently approved chronic therapies. <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients initiated on L-glutamine, voxelotor or crizanlizumab had low adherence (based on PDC), continued to experience frequent VOC, and incurred higher healthcare costs mostly due to the costs of these therapies. This highlights the need for additional treatment options for patients with SCD with recurrent VOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679662/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145587498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-27DOI: 10.57264/cer-2025-0097
Tao Tang, Jing Liu, Bo Gao, Yu Gao, Gaopan Zhang, Gang Guo
Aim: The optimal management strategies for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia region are still controversial. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the clinical benefits of craniotomy, minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD) and conservative treatment in patients with basal ganglia hematoma. Materials & methods: This study retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with hematoma ≥20 ml in the basal ganglia hemorrhage and onset to admission within 24 h. Primary outcome was the proportion of favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0-3) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included excellent outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0-2) and mortality at 3 months and 1 year. Sensitive analysis was performed in patients with hematoma ≥ 30 ml. Results: A total of 481 patients were included and divided into three groups: 146 received craniotomy, 211 underwent MIPD and 124 were managed with conservative treatment. The proportion of primary outcome was lower in the craniotomy (23.24%) than in the MIPD (35.41%) and conservative treatment (41.94%) groups. Among patients with hematoma ≥30 ml, MIPD has higher rates of favorable outcome at 3 months (37.32 vs 25.98%, p = 0.05) and 1 year (52.82 vs 40.16%, p = 0.04) compared with craniotomy; albeit. The short-term and long-term mortality was similar in three groups. Conclusion: MIPD was found to be associated with both short- and long-term favorable outcomes in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia region. Moreover, neither MIPD nor craniotomy showed an association with increased risk of short- or long-term mortality.
目的:基底节区自发性脑出血的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估开颅、微创穿刺引流(MIPD)和保守治疗基底神经节血肿的临床疗效。材料与方法:本研究回顾性纳入基底节区出血血肿≥20ml且24 h内发病至入院的连续患者。主要转归为3个月时的良好转归比例(改良Rankin量表评分0-3分)。次要结局包括良好结局(改良Rankin量表评分0-2分)和3个月和1年的死亡率。结果:共纳入481例患者,分为三组:开颅146例,MIPD 211例,保守治疗124例。开颅组的主要转归比例(23.24%)低于MIPD组(35.41%)和保守治疗组(41.94%)。在血肿≥30 ml的患者中,MIPD在3个月(37.32 vs 25.98%, p = 0.05)和1年(52.82 vs 40.16%, p = 0.04)时的良好转换率高于开颅手术;尽管。三组患者的短期和长期死亡率相似。结论:发现MIPD与基底节区自发性脑出血患者的短期和长期良好预后相关。此外,MIPD和开颅手术均未显示与短期或长期死亡风险增加相关。
{"title":"Comparison treatments for basal ganglia hemorrhage: minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus craniotomy versus conservative treatment.","authors":"Tao Tang, Jing Liu, Bo Gao, Yu Gao, Gaopan Zhang, Gang Guo","doi":"10.57264/cer-2025-0097","DOIUrl":"10.57264/cer-2025-0097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> The optimal management strategies for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia region are still controversial. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the clinical benefits of craniotomy, minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD) and conservative treatment in patients with basal ganglia hematoma. <b>Materials & methods:</b> This study retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with hematoma ≥20 ml in the basal ganglia hemorrhage and onset to admission within 24 h. Primary outcome was the proportion of favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0-3) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included excellent outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0-2) and mortality at 3 months and 1 year. Sensitive analysis was performed in patients with hematoma ≥ 30 ml. <b>Results:</b> A total of 481 patients were included and divided into three groups: 146 received craniotomy, 211 underwent MIPD and 124 were managed with conservative treatment. The proportion of primary outcome was lower in the craniotomy (23.24%) than in the MIPD (35.41%) and conservative treatment (41.94%) groups. Among patients with hematoma ≥30 ml, MIPD has higher rates of favorable outcome at 3 months (37.32 vs 25.98%, p = 0.05) and 1 year (52.82 vs 40.16%, p = 0.04) compared with craniotomy; albeit. The short-term and long-term mortality was similar in three groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> MIPD was found to be associated with both short- and long-term favorable outcomes in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia region. Moreover, neither MIPD nor craniotomy showed an association with increased risk of short- or long-term mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e250097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679653/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145634435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}