Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01386-x
Evelyn Tran, María Cabán, Alicia Meng, John Wetmore, Ruth Ottman, Karolynn Siegel
Latinos face health disparities in Alzheimer's disease (AD), with high disease prevalence relative to non-Latino whites and barriers to healthcare access. Several studies have found misconceptions about AD among Latinos that were linked to reduced preventative or help-seeking behavior. To improve understanding of illness perceptions among Latinos, we examined beliefs about the causes of AD, one of the five dimensions of illness representations from Leventhal's Self-Regulation Theory, among a sample of N = 216 Latinos. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participants aged 40 to 64 (average age 53 years) living in northern Manhattan. Seven distinct causes of AD were identified, though participants demonstrated a general understanding of AD as a multifactorial disease. Genetics was found to be the most endorsed cause of AD, followed by unhealthy lifestyle factors. Most Latinos who believed psychosocial factors played a critical role in AD development were first-generation immigrants. No participants attributed AD to a normal process of aging, and few ascribed the disease to brain damage from stroke or head injuries. Several participants expressed the belief that environmental contaminants can cause AD, which has received little mention in prior studies. Though only a small number thought AD could occur by chance, most participants remained uncertain about the exact causes of the disease and used lay knowledge to explain their beliefs. Our findings help identify areas where educational interventions would be beneficial in improving community knowledge and offer perspectives that can foster cultural competency in healthcare.
{"title":"Beliefs About the Causes of Alzheimer's Disease Among Latinos in New York City.","authors":"Evelyn Tran, María Cabán, Alicia Meng, John Wetmore, Ruth Ottman, Karolynn Siegel","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01386-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01386-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Latinos face health disparities in Alzheimer's disease (AD), with high disease prevalence relative to non-Latino whites and barriers to healthcare access. Several studies have found misconceptions about AD among Latinos that were linked to reduced preventative or help-seeking behavior. To improve understanding of illness perceptions among Latinos, we examined beliefs about the causes of AD, one of the five dimensions of illness representations from Leventhal's Self-Regulation Theory, among a sample of N = 216 Latinos. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participants aged 40 to 64 (average age 53 years) living in northern Manhattan. Seven distinct causes of AD were identified, though participants demonstrated a general understanding of AD as a multifactorial disease. Genetics was found to be the most endorsed cause of AD, followed by unhealthy lifestyle factors. Most Latinos who believed psychosocial factors played a critical role in AD development were first-generation immigrants. No participants attributed AD to a normal process of aging, and few ascribed the disease to brain damage from stroke or head injuries. Several participants expressed the belief that environmental contaminants can cause AD, which has received little mention in prior studies. Though only a small number thought AD could occur by chance, most participants remained uncertain about the exact causes of the disease and used lay knowledge to explain their beliefs. Our findings help identify areas where educational interventions would be beneficial in improving community knowledge and offer perspectives that can foster cultural competency in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01395-w
Jacqueline Hua, Kristopher Jackson
Vietnamese women have a higher incidence rate of cervical cancer and are less likely to have ever been screened for cervical cancer than their White counterparts in the US. This review synthesizes findings from published interventions to promote cervical cancer screening in this vulnerable population. Articles were identified through a systematic search of PsycInfo, Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials in October 2022. Articles were included if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal, written in English, included one or more interventions promoting cervical cancer screening, assessed at least one outcome relevant to screening, and included a sample of ≥ 70% Vietnamese participants. Quality assessment scores were computed using the Downs and Black Checklist. Fifteen articles met review inclusion criteria. Studies were, on average, of good quality. Most studies were conducted in the US (n = 12), used a quasi-experimental design (n = 9), and employed multiple intervention strategies (n = 12). Intervention strategies included educational sessions, lay health worker (LHW) outreach, small media, mass media, patient navigation, and community or healthcare-based strategies. The most common study outcomes were screening intention and receipt. All but two studies reported improved cervical cancer screening outcomes following intervention. Findings support the effectiveness of multicomponent culturally tailored interventions to improve cervical cancer screening outcomes in immigrant Vietnamese women. Further research is needed to determine whether these interventions will be as successful in non-US countries and to address broader community- and healthcare-based factors in screening.
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Immigrant Vietnamese Women.","authors":"Jacqueline Hua, Kristopher Jackson","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01395-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01395-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vietnamese women have a higher incidence rate of cervical cancer and are less likely to have ever been screened for cervical cancer than their White counterparts in the US. This review synthesizes findings from published interventions to promote cervical cancer screening in this vulnerable population. Articles were identified through a systematic search of PsycInfo, Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials in October 2022. Articles were included if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal, written in English, included one or more interventions promoting cervical cancer screening, assessed at least one outcome relevant to screening, and included a sample of ≥ 70% Vietnamese participants. Quality assessment scores were computed using the Downs and Black Checklist. Fifteen articles met review inclusion criteria. Studies were, on average, of good quality. Most studies were conducted in the US (n = 12), used a quasi-experimental design (n = 9), and employed multiple intervention strategies (n = 12). Intervention strategies included educational sessions, lay health worker (LHW) outreach, small media, mass media, patient navigation, and community or healthcare-based strategies. The most common study outcomes were screening intention and receipt. All but two studies reported improved cervical cancer screening outcomes following intervention. Findings support the effectiveness of multicomponent culturally tailored interventions to improve cervical cancer screening outcomes in immigrant Vietnamese women. Further research is needed to determine whether these interventions will be as successful in non-US countries and to address broader community- and healthcare-based factors in screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"187-198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01391-0
Parsa Nilchian, Subhanik Purkayastha, Gianni Thomas, Kaya L Curtis, Natalia Roszkowska, Elizabeth K Benitez, Tiffany Merlinsky, Michael Farid, Cecilia E W Nicol, Ashita S Batavia, Pamela Charney
The increasing reliance on digital tools for standard healthcare practices in uninsured populations is poorly understood. This study aims to assess the impacts of a newly implemented digital reimbursement system at a student-run primary care clinic associated with an academic medical institution serving uninsured New York City residents. Pharmacy records of 94 unique patients receiving a total of 2770 reimbursements between October 17th, 2016, and May 18th, 2023, were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups (in-person vs. digital) based on their reimbursement preferences type. Demographic analyses were performed in addition to assessing reimbursement volumes, number of refunds, and duration until receipt of payment for each group. The clinic's total monthly reimbursement volume, number of prescriptions, and number of patients for the period before introduction of digital refunds was compared to the period after. The mean age (in-person = 52.7 ± 14.7 years, digital = 54.9 ± 12.9 years) was not statistically different between the groups. Patients in the digital group requested on average more refunds (digital = 47 refunds, in-person = 14 refunds), received higher total reimbursement amount (digital = $1131.24, in-person = $289.36), and they were reimbursed faster (digital = 56 days, in-person = 62 days). Since the introduction of the digital reimbursement option, our three-month reimbursement volume more than doubled from $481 to $1298. The average number of monthly reimbursements increased from 27 to 45 refunds, and the number of monthly patients increased from 6 to 9 patients. In summary, digital reimbursement options can facilitate medication reimbursement among uninsured patients. These results suggest that digital reimbursement systems result in higher utilization, faster refunds, and larger total reimbursements amount for uninsured and underserved patients.
{"title":"Digital Reimbursement Systems in a Student-Run Clinic.","authors":"Parsa Nilchian, Subhanik Purkayastha, Gianni Thomas, Kaya L Curtis, Natalia Roszkowska, Elizabeth K Benitez, Tiffany Merlinsky, Michael Farid, Cecilia E W Nicol, Ashita S Batavia, Pamela Charney","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01391-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01391-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing reliance on digital tools for standard healthcare practices in uninsured populations is poorly understood. This study aims to assess the impacts of a newly implemented digital reimbursement system at a student-run primary care clinic associated with an academic medical institution serving uninsured New York City residents. Pharmacy records of 94 unique patients receiving a total of 2770 reimbursements between October 17th, 2016, and May 18th, 2023, were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups (in-person vs. digital) based on their reimbursement preferences type. Demographic analyses were performed in addition to assessing reimbursement volumes, number of refunds, and duration until receipt of payment for each group. The clinic's total monthly reimbursement volume, number of prescriptions, and number of patients for the period before introduction of digital refunds was compared to the period after. The mean age (in-person = 52.7 ± 14.7 years, digital = 54.9 ± 12.9 years) was not statistically different between the groups. Patients in the digital group requested on average more refunds (digital = 47 refunds, in-person = 14 refunds), received higher total reimbursement amount (digital = $1131.24, in-person = $289.36), and they were reimbursed faster (digital = 56 days, in-person = 62 days). Since the introduction of the digital reimbursement option, our three-month reimbursement volume more than doubled from $481 to $1298. The average number of monthly reimbursements increased from 27 to 45 refunds, and the number of monthly patients increased from 6 to 9 patients. In summary, digital reimbursement options can facilitate medication reimbursement among uninsured patients. These results suggest that digital reimbursement systems result in higher utilization, faster refunds, and larger total reimbursements amount for uninsured and underserved patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-05DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01396-9
Abby J Schwartz, Alice R Richman, Essie Torres
Racially and ethnically diverse populations and individuals residing in rural areas were disproportionally impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, and Eastern North Carolina (ENC) is one region where such impacts were apparent. To understand at-risk individuals' perceptions and hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccines and the preferred means of receiving vaccination-related messages, we conducted four qualitative focus groups (N = 40) with diverse rural ENC residents. The analysis of the focus group transcripts revealed five themes: (1) reasons people trusted the COVID-19 vaccines, (2) reasons people mistrusted the COVID-19 vaccines, (3) the best means to deliver messages regarding COVID-19 vaccination, (4) the individuals trusted most to deliver such messages, and (5) the decisions people made regarding whether to get vaccinated and how that was connected to God. By incorporating participant perspectives and preferences in receiving messaging into campaigns, there is a potential for greater vaccine uptake.
{"title":"Messaging Preferences about the COVID-19 Vaccine among Adults in Eastern North Carolina.","authors":"Abby J Schwartz, Alice R Richman, Essie Torres","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01396-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01396-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racially and ethnically diverse populations and individuals residing in rural areas were disproportionally impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, and Eastern North Carolina (ENC) is one region where such impacts were apparent. To understand at-risk individuals' perceptions and hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccines and the preferred means of receiving vaccination-related messages, we conducted four qualitative focus groups (N = 40) with diverse rural ENC residents. The analysis of the focus group transcripts revealed five themes: (1) reasons people trusted the COVID-19 vaccines, (2) reasons people mistrusted the COVID-19 vaccines, (3) the best means to deliver messages regarding COVID-19 vaccination, (4) the individuals trusted most to deliver such messages, and (5) the decisions people made regarding whether to get vaccinated and how that was connected to God. By incorporating participant perspectives and preferences in receiving messaging into campaigns, there is a potential for greater vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805819/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01402-0
Noah Lenstra, Heather Franklin, Nathan F Dieckmann, Elena Andreyeva, Jay Maddock, Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler, Jim Winkle, Cynthia K Perry
Although health promotion is not the primary function of public libraries, it is well documented that many libraries engage in health promotion activities, even when resources are constrained. Less understood is the readiness of the public library workforce, particularly in rural communities, to implement evidence-based health promotion programs. This study uses a modified version of the Competency Assessment for Tier 2 Public Health Professionals to assess the readiness of a small sample (n = 21) of Oregon rural library managers to implement evidence-based health initiatives. Results show that outside of communication skills, most rural library workers do not consider themselves to have proficiency in core health promotion competencies. Although some slight differences were found among librarians based on socio-demographic factors, those differences were not statistically significant. Implications include the need for strengthened support to build the capacity for rural public library workers who are interested in delivering evidence-based health promotion programs.
尽管健康促进并不是公共图书馆的主要职能,但许多图书馆都参与了健康促进活 动,即使在资源有限的情况下也是有据可查的。但人们对公共图书馆工作人员,尤其是农村社区的公共图书馆工作人员,在实施循证健康促进计划方面的准备情况了解较少。本研究使用了 "二级公共卫生专业人员能力评估"(Competency Assessment for Tier 2 Public Health Professionals)的修订版,对俄勒冈州农村图书馆管理人员(n = 21)实施循证健康计划的准备情况进行了小样本评估。结果表明,除沟通技巧外,大多数乡村图书馆工作者认为自己不具备健康促进核心能力。尽管根据社会人口因素,图书馆员之间存在一些微小的差异,但这些差异在统计上并不显著。这意味着需要加强支持,为有志于开展循证健康促进项目的农村公共图书馆工作者进行能力建设。
{"title":"Assessing the Readiness of Rural Public Librarians to Implement Public Health Programs.","authors":"Noah Lenstra, Heather Franklin, Nathan F Dieckmann, Elena Andreyeva, Jay Maddock, Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler, Jim Winkle, Cynthia K Perry","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01402-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01402-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although health promotion is not the primary function of public libraries, it is well documented that many libraries engage in health promotion activities, even when resources are constrained. Less understood is the readiness of the public library workforce, particularly in rural communities, to implement evidence-based health promotion programs. This study uses a modified version of the Competency Assessment for Tier 2 Public Health Professionals to assess the readiness of a small sample (n = 21) of Oregon rural library managers to implement evidence-based health initiatives. Results show that outside of communication skills, most rural library workers do not consider themselves to have proficiency in core health promotion competencies. Although some slight differences were found among librarians based on socio-demographic factors, those differences were not statistically significant. Implications include the need for strengthened support to build the capacity for rural public library workers who are interested in delivering evidence-based health promotion programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"152-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805653/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01400-2
Leandra Bitterfeld, Mustafa Ozkaynak, Andrea H Denton, Cornelius A Normeshie, Rupa S Valdez, Noor Sharif, Priscilla A Caldwell, Fern R Hauck
Refugees arriving to the U.S. experience a high burden of both communicable and non-communicable diseases. There is a potential to improve health outcomes for refugees through well-developed, comprehensive interventions, but the effectiveness of such interventions is poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to identify, characterize and evaluate the effectiveness of patient-level healthcare interventions for U.S. refugee populations. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for articles that included a population of refugees of any age, included an intervention aimed at improving health, included an evaluation of the intervention's outcomes, and were conducted in the U.S. from 2000 to 2022. Thirty-seven studies were included, and we identified three main intervention modalities: healthcare provision/management, resource provision, and education. Interventions targeted general health, infectious disease, women's health, diet/exercise, health literacy, oral health, diabetes, family health, and substance use. The outcomes measured included knowledge, satisfaction, behavioral outcomes, and physical health markers. This review demonstrates that a few health conditions, namely tuberculosis, have been addressed with large-scale, sustained interventions. Other conditions (general health and women's health) have been addressed through piecemeal, short-term interventions. The evaluation of interventions often focuses on knowledge or satisfaction rather than health or behavior change outcomes. Future work should focus on the best strategies for developing sustainable interventions that meet the needs of the diverse population of refugees in the U.S.
来到美国的难民面临着传染性和非传染性疾病的沉重负担。通过制定完善的综合干预措施,有可能改善难民的健康状况,但人们对此类干预措施的有效性知之甚少。本综述旨在确定、描述和评估针对美国难民人口的患者层面医疗保健干预措施的有效性。我们根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》进行了系统综述。我们通过PubMed Medline、Web of Science、Embase和CINAHL检索了2000年至2022年期间在美国进行的、包含任何年龄的难民人群、包含旨在改善健康状况的干预措施、包含对干预措施结果的评估的文章。我们共纳入了 37 项研究,并确定了三种主要干预方式:医疗保健提供/管理、资源提供和教育。干预措施主要针对一般健康、传染病、妇女健康、饮食/运动、健康知识普及、口腔健康、糖尿病、家庭健康和药物使用。衡量的结果包括知识、满意度、行为结果和身体健康指标。本次审查表明,少数健康状况,即结核病,已经通过大规模、持续的干预措施得到了解决。其他疾病(一般健康和妇女健康)则是通过零散的短期干预措施来解决的。对干预措施的评估往往侧重于知识或满意度,而不是健康或行为改变的结果。今后的工作应侧重于制定可持续干预措施的最佳战略,以满足在美难民的不同需求。
{"title":"Interventions to Improve Health Among Refugees in the United States: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Leandra Bitterfeld, Mustafa Ozkaynak, Andrea H Denton, Cornelius A Normeshie, Rupa S Valdez, Noor Sharif, Priscilla A Caldwell, Fern R Hauck","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01400-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01400-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Refugees arriving to the U.S. experience a high burden of both communicable and non-communicable diseases. There is a potential to improve health outcomes for refugees through well-developed, comprehensive interventions, but the effectiveness of such interventions is poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to identify, characterize and evaluate the effectiveness of patient-level healthcare interventions for U.S. refugee populations. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for articles that included a population of refugees of any age, included an intervention aimed at improving health, included an evaluation of the intervention's outcomes, and were conducted in the U.S. from 2000 to 2022. Thirty-seven studies were included, and we identified three main intervention modalities: healthcare provision/management, resource provision, and education. Interventions targeted general health, infectious disease, women's health, diet/exercise, health literacy, oral health, diabetes, family health, and substance use. The outcomes measured included knowledge, satisfaction, behavioral outcomes, and physical health markers. This review demonstrates that a few health conditions, namely tuberculosis, have been addressed with large-scale, sustained interventions. Other conditions (general health and women's health) have been addressed through piecemeal, short-term interventions. The evaluation of interventions often focuses on knowledge or satisfaction rather than health or behavior change outcomes. Future work should focus on the best strategies for developing sustainable interventions that meet the needs of the diverse population of refugees in the U.S.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"130-151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805879/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142145764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01392-z
Rodman Turpin, Derek T Dangerfield Ii, Temitope Oke, Roland J Thorpe, DeMarc A Hickson
Purpose: LGBTQ + community connectedness is generally a protective health factor for sexual and gender minorities. However, existing scales have not been validated among Black sexual minority men living with HIV (SMMLWH), who face unique marginalized experiences that disproportionately impact several health outcomes compared to the general LGBT + community. We validated the Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale among Black SMMLWH.
Methods: We validated the 9-item Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale from Frost and Meyer using preliminary data from a cohort of Mid-Atlantic Black SMMLWH (n = 650). Factor analysis and intercorrelations were conducted to assess unidimensionality, and Cronbach's alpha was measured for reliability. Correlations and cumulative ordinal regression models were generated using internalized homophobia, hopelessness, depression, HIV stigma, social support, and resilience as criterion constructs. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics.
Results: The Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale demonstrated high internal consistency (alpha = 0.948) and strong item intercorrelation with a single factor structure. The scale was associated with all criterion measures before and after adjustment, including lower internalized homophobia (aCOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.15-0.25), lower hopelessness (aCOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68), lower HIV stigma (aCOR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), and lower depression (aCOR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.75). The scale was also associated with greater social support (aCOR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.91-2.97) and resilience (aCOR = 2.53, 95% CI 2.03-3.15).
Conclusion: The Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale is a valid measure for use among Black SMMLWH. Future studies should explore relationships between community connectedness and HIV care outcomes and quality of life among Black SMMLWH.
目的:LGBTQ + 社区联系通常是性少数群体和性别少数群体的健康保护因素。然而,现有的量表尚未在感染艾滋病毒的黑人性少数群体男性(SMMLWH)中进行过验证,与一般的 LGBT + 群体相比,他们面临着独特的边缘化经历,对多种健康结果产生了不成比例的影响。我们在黑人 SMMLWH 中验证了 "与 LGBT 社区的联系 "量表:我们使用来自大西洋中部黑人 SMMLWH 群体(n = 650)的初步数据,验证了弗罗斯特和迈耶的 LGBT 社区联系度量表中的 9 个项目。为了评估单维性,我们进行了因子分析和相互关系分析,并测量了 Cronbach's alpha 的可靠性。以内部化恐同症、绝望、抑郁、HIV 耻辱感、社会支持和复原力为标准建构物,建立了相关性和累积序数回归模型。模型根据社会人口和行为特征进行了调整:与 LGBT 群体的联系量表显示出较高的内部一致性(α = 0.948)和较强的项目间相关性,具有单因素结构。在调整前后,该量表与所有标准测量值都有关联,包括较低的内化恐同症(aCOR = 0.19,95% CI 0.15-0.25)、较低的绝望感(aCOR = 0.53,95% CI 0.41-0.68)、较低的 HIV 耻辱感(aCOR = 0.58,95% CI 0.47-0.72)和较低的抑郁症(aCOR = 0.61,95% CI 0.50-0.75)。该量表还与更大的社会支持(aCOR = 2.38,95% CI 1.91-2.97)和复原力(aCOR = 2.53,95% CI 2.03-3.15)相关:与男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者社区的联系量表是一种有效的测量方法,适用于黑人 SMMLWH。未来的研究应探讨黑人 SMMLWH 中社区关联性与 HIV 护理结果和生活质量之间的关系。
{"title":"Psychometric Validation of the Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale among Black Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV.","authors":"Rodman Turpin, Derek T Dangerfield Ii, Temitope Oke, Roland J Thorpe, DeMarc A Hickson","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01392-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10900-024-01392-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>LGBTQ + community connectedness is generally a protective health factor for sexual and gender minorities. However, existing scales have not been validated among Black sexual minority men living with HIV (SMMLWH), who face unique marginalized experiences that disproportionately impact several health outcomes compared to the general LGBT + community. We validated the Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale among Black SMMLWH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We validated the 9-item Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale from Frost and Meyer using preliminary data from a cohort of Mid-Atlantic Black SMMLWH (n = 650). Factor analysis and intercorrelations were conducted to assess unidimensionality, and Cronbach's alpha was measured for reliability. Correlations and cumulative ordinal regression models were generated using internalized homophobia, hopelessness, depression, HIV stigma, social support, and resilience as criterion constructs. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale demonstrated high internal consistency (alpha = 0.948) and strong item intercorrelation with a single factor structure. The scale was associated with all criterion measures before and after adjustment, including lower internalized homophobia (aCOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.15-0.25), lower hopelessness (aCOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.41-0.68), lower HIV stigma (aCOR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), and lower depression (aCOR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.75). The scale was also associated with greater social support (aCOR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.91-2.97) and resilience (aCOR = 2.53, 95% CI 2.03-3.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Connectedness to the LGBT Community Scale is a valid measure for use among Black SMMLWH. Future studies should explore relationships between community connectedness and HIV care outcomes and quality of life among Black SMMLWH.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-30DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01441-7
James H Price, Erica Payton
Each year in the United States (U.S.) thousands of older adults die from firearm-related injuries. The purpose of this study was to characterize the similarities and differences in the three main forms of firearm mortality (homicides, suicides, and unintentional) in older adults. Using the Web-based Inquiry Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) for the year 2021 we conducted a descriptive analysis (e.g. frequencies, percents, crude rates, rank orders) by gender, race/ethnicity, age, and census region of the U.S. Older adult firearm-related homicides were most likely to occur in males (61.2%), non-Hispanic whites (61.9%), ages 65-69 (42.4%) and in the South (53.6%). Firearm-related suicides were most common in males (91.4%), non-Hispanic whites (93.5%), ages 65-69 and 70-74 (24.8 and 24.7%, respectively), and in the South (45.1%). Firearm suicides were 12 times more common than firearm homicides and 99 times more common than unintentional firearm-related deaths. Both firearm homicides and suicides decreased with age. Years of potential life lost before 80 paralleled the demographic mortality data, resulting in over 45,000 potential years of life lost in 2021. These findings underscore the need to focus primary prevention of firearm-related mortality in older adults on the role of suicides, especially in non-Hispanic white males. In addition, improving mental health care access for older adults and their social connections are essential elements of preventing firearm-related suicides.
{"title":"Firearm Deaths Impacting Older Adults.","authors":"James H Price, Erica Payton","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01441-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01441-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Each year in the United States (U.S.) thousands of older adults die from firearm-related injuries. The purpose of this study was to characterize the similarities and differences in the three main forms of firearm mortality (homicides, suicides, and unintentional) in older adults. Using the Web-based Inquiry Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) for the year 2021 we conducted a descriptive analysis (e.g. frequencies, percents, crude rates, rank orders) by gender, race/ethnicity, age, and census region of the U.S. Older adult firearm-related homicides were most likely to occur in males (61.2%), non-Hispanic whites (61.9%), ages 65-69 (42.4%) and in the South (53.6%). Firearm-related suicides were most common in males (91.4%), non-Hispanic whites (93.5%), ages 65-69 and 70-74 (24.8 and 24.7%, respectively), and in the South (45.1%). Firearm suicides were 12 times more common than firearm homicides and 99 times more common than unintentional firearm-related deaths. Both firearm homicides and suicides decreased with age. Years of potential life lost before 80 paralleled the demographic mortality data, resulting in over 45,000 potential years of life lost in 2021. These findings underscore the need to focus primary prevention of firearm-related mortality in older adults on the role of suicides, especially in non-Hispanic white males. In addition, improving mental health care access for older adults and their social connections are essential elements of preventing firearm-related suicides.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143066005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01439-1
Andrew Brown, Lyndsey Kilgore, Elizabeth Jeffers, Kelsey Larson, Jamie Wagner, Jordan Baker, Isuru Ratnayake, Lynn Chollet Hinton, Christa Balanoff
Health care disparities within the LGBTQIA+ community are readily apparent. Guidelines have been published regarding breast cancer screening for transgender individuals. Uptake of these recommendations is widely unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the current knowledge base of providers regarding these recommendations within our academic hospital system. A voluntary, anonymous survey was e-mailed to 303 recipients via RedCap to physicians within our academic hospital system. This assessed the respondents' current knowledge and comfort regarding breast cancer screening recommendations in the transgender population. 85 responses were received for a response rate of 28.1%. Descriptive statistics for all survey questions was conducted. 82.4% of respondents report caring for transgender patients. 62.4% report that they are not familiar with the current screening recommendations, and few (10.6%) have received formal education regarding the topic. The majority of respondents reported that they would be interested in receiving formal training. The results suggest that there is no difference in how individuals rate their current comfort level discussing breast cancer screening recommendations for the transgender population despite their current level of education. Our findings suggest that, while the majority of providers within our academic hospital system care for transgender patients, they are unfamiliar with current breast cancer screening recommendations and have received no formal training. The results also suggest that providers are interested in receiving formal education.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Current Knowledge Base of Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations in the Transgender Population at an Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Andrew Brown, Lyndsey Kilgore, Elizabeth Jeffers, Kelsey Larson, Jamie Wagner, Jordan Baker, Isuru Ratnayake, Lynn Chollet Hinton, Christa Balanoff","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01439-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01439-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care disparities within the LGBTQIA+ community are readily apparent. Guidelines have been published regarding breast cancer screening for transgender individuals. Uptake of these recommendations is widely unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the current knowledge base of providers regarding these recommendations within our academic hospital system. A voluntary, anonymous survey was e-mailed to 303 recipients via RedCap to physicians within our academic hospital system. This assessed the respondents' current knowledge and comfort regarding breast cancer screening recommendations in the transgender population. 85 responses were received for a response rate of 28.1%. Descriptive statistics for all survey questions was conducted. 82.4% of respondents report caring for transgender patients. 62.4% report that they are not familiar with the current screening recommendations, and few (10.6%) have received formal education regarding the topic. The majority of respondents reported that they would be interested in receiving formal training. The results suggest that there is no difference in how individuals rate their current comfort level discussing breast cancer screening recommendations for the transgender population despite their current level of education. Our findings suggest that, while the majority of providers within our academic hospital system care for transgender patients, they are unfamiliar with current breast cancer screening recommendations and have received no formal training. The results also suggest that providers are interested in receiving formal education.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-20DOI: 10.1007/s10900-024-01436-4
Chelsea R Singleton, Danielle J Gartner, Fikriyah Winata, Donald Rose, Karen M Sheehan, Sara L McLafferty
Crime is a public health issue that disproportionately affects racially-marginalized populations. Studies have reported that food stores (e.g., grocery stores, convenience stores) often attract crime due to their volume of cash transactions and limited security. Little is known about how exposure to crime at food stores affects nutrition or health. This study aimed to fill this research gap by exploring the lived experiences of Black Americans. In 2023, 502 Black-identifying adults completed a survey online. They reported their socio-demographics, fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption, food security status, height, weight, and experiences with crime at food stores in their community. Multivariable-adjusted regression models were examined to identify associations between exposure to crime at food stores and the following measures: low food security status, obesity status, and daily servings of FVs. Approximately 150 (29%) participants avoided one or more food stores in their community due to crime; 102 (20%) had witnessed a crime at a food store. Those who avoided food stores had greater odds of low food security (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.25-3.02) and obesity (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.33-3.48) compared to others. Those who witnessed a crime had greater odds of low food security (OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.82-5.41). Exposure to crime at food stores was not associated with FV consumption after adjusting for socio-demographics. Exposure to crime in food stores may have negative health and nutritional implications. Future studies should explore these implications for populations that are disproportionately affected by crime.
{"title":"Exposure to Crime at Food Stores: Implications for Nutrition and Health among Black Americans.","authors":"Chelsea R Singleton, Danielle J Gartner, Fikriyah Winata, Donald Rose, Karen M Sheehan, Sara L McLafferty","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01436-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01436-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crime is a public health issue that disproportionately affects racially-marginalized populations. Studies have reported that food stores (e.g., grocery stores, convenience stores) often attract crime due to their volume of cash transactions and limited security. Little is known about how exposure to crime at food stores affects nutrition or health. This study aimed to fill this research gap by exploring the lived experiences of Black Americans. In 2023, 502 Black-identifying adults completed a survey online. They reported their socio-demographics, fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption, food security status, height, weight, and experiences with crime at food stores in their community. Multivariable-adjusted regression models were examined to identify associations between exposure to crime at food stores and the following measures: low food security status, obesity status, and daily servings of FVs. Approximately 150 (29%) participants avoided one or more food stores in their community due to crime; 102 (20%) had witnessed a crime at a food store. Those who avoided food stores had greater odds of low food security (OR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.25-3.02) and obesity (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.33-3.48) compared to others. Those who witnessed a crime had greater odds of low food security (OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.82-5.41). Exposure to crime at food stores was not associated with FV consumption after adjusting for socio-demographics. Exposure to crime in food stores may have negative health and nutritional implications. Future studies should explore these implications for populations that are disproportionately affected by crime.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143006414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}