Journal of endourology最新文献

Introduction: Before holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), many patients have undergone short-term prostate biopsy (PB) to rule out the presence of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short-term PB before HoLEP has an impact on the perioperative outcomes or complications of HoLEP. Methods: In total, 734 consecutive patients treated with HoLEP at a tertiary care university hospital between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who had PB within 6 months before HoLEP were matched to patients who underwent PB more than 6 months or had no PB before HoLEP using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), and surgeon. Perioperative parameters, such as operation time (OT), enucleation efficiency (EF), as well as complications according to the Satava classification, the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) were evaluated. Results: In total, 206 patients were matched. Age, PV, PSA, as well as the presence of a preoperative UTI and surgeons did not differ significantly between both groups after PSM. There were no significant differences in mean OT (75 vs. 81 minutes, p = 0.28) and EF (2.13 vs. 2.13 g/min, p = 0.99). No differences were noted regarding intraoperative (16 vs. 25, p = 0.16) or postoperative complications graded by CDC (p = 0.53) and CCI (p = 0.92). Conclusion: PB within 6 months preoperatively before HoLEP showed no effect on perioperative outcomes or intra- and postoperative complications.

Objective: Renoprotection from reperfusion injury appears to be conferred by HIF-2a activation, which can be stimulated by exogenous acetate administration. The study objective was to assess whether administration of acetate in a porcine model can mitigate kidney injury related to ischemia-reperfusion after renal hilar occlusion. Methods: A porcine single-kidney model was created by performing a laparoscopic nephrectomy followed by animal recovery. After 2 days, the animals underwent laparoscopic hilar dissection. Block randomization was used to assign pigs into one of four experimental groups. One treatment block of pigs received 150 mEq of sodium acetate intravenously during 90 minutes of en bloc occlusion of the renal hilum (herein noted as "cross-clamping"). Another block received 0.75 g/kg of oral sodium acetate for 3 days prior to cross-clamping. A third block received no acetate and underwent hilar dissection without cross-clamping (negative control). The final block received no acetate and underwent cross-clamping (positive control). Serum creatinine was used to estimate renal function post-nephrectomy. Results: A total of 16 animals (4 pigs in each group) completed the study protocol. Median pig weight was 34.6 kg. One pig receiving IV acetate was excluded from the final analysis because of unrecoverable renal failure after cross-clamping. There was a significantly lower mean serum creatinine for the IV acetate group compared with the positive control group 72 hours after cross-clamping (p = 0.012). The same effect was not observed for the pigs receiving oral acetate. By day 7, renal function had recovered without significant difference in all groups. Conclusions: We observed that the administration of intravenous acetate conferred a significant renoprotective benefit in our single kidney ischemia-reperfusion porcine model 72 hours after hilar occlusion. This work is hypothesis-generating, and further work in human subjects undergoing renal hilar occlusion during partial nephrectomy is warranted.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and postoperative infection rate of super mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) in patients with diabetic nephrolithiasis and to explore the risk factors associated with postoperative infection following these two procedures. Methods: The medical history and surgery details of 252 patients with diabetic nephrolithiasis who underwent lithotripsy in our hospital between January 2018 and May 2023, including 144 SMP and 108 FURL, were reviewed and compared. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was performed to identify the significant risk factors for infection after each procedure. Results: SMP achieved a higher stone-free rate (SFR) on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 30 compared with FURL (p < 0.05). The mean operative time was shorter in SMP (p < 0.01). FURL was associated with less hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01) and shorter length of stay (p < 0.01). The incident rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was higher after SMP (p = 0.019), while the incident rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) was higher after FURL (p = 0.021). Overall postoperative infection and sepsis rates were similar between the two procedures. Logistic regression analysis revealed that gender odds ratio [OR]: 0.225, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.079-0.639), HbA1c (OR: 3.516, 95% CI: 1.841-6.716), and operation time (OR: 1.037, 95% CI: 1.008-1.066) were independent risk factors for infection after FURL, while operation time (OR: 1.063, 95% CI: 1.022-1.106) and HbA1c (OR: 7.443, 95% CI: 2.956-18.742) significantly predicted SMP-associated infections. Conclusion: In diabetic patients, SMP demonstrated higher SFR and shorter operation time, whereas FURL was associated with less bleeding and shorter hospitalization. SMP had a higher incident rate of SIRS and FURL had a higher incident rate of UTI. Elevated HbA1c and prolonged operative duration increased infection risk after both procedures, while female gender was an additional risk factor for FURL-related infections.

Background: We detail our approach and experience with a hybrid version of the endopelvic hood-sparing (HS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the da Vinci robotic platform. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 200 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon. Patients were propensity-matched into three cohorts depending on biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason Grade Groups: traditional retropubic (RP) (n = 80), retzius-sparing (RS) (n = 40), and HS (n = 80). Patient characteristics and oncologic and functional outcomes were examined. Zero pads per day defined return of continence. Erections suitable for penetrative intercourse with/without medications defined return of sexual function. Results: Patient characteristics were similar between cohorts excluding prostate-specific antigen levels (p = 0.014), which were significantly lower in the RS cohort (7.1 ± 5.3 ng/mL) compared with RP (9.2 ± 9.3 ng/mL) and HS (8.8 ± 8.9 ng/mL). Clinically significant positive margin rates were significantly higher (p = 0.046) in the RS cohort (32.5%) compared with RP (17.5%) and HS (13.9%). Biochemical recurrence and metastasis rates were similar between all cohorts. Median time to continence was significantly lower for RS and HS-RARP (p < 0.001) compared with RP-RARP at 1.3, 1.6, and 5.4 months, respectively. Median time to return of sexual function was significantly lower for RS and HS-RARP (p < 0.001) compared with RP-RARP at 4.0, 7.7, and 15.1 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our hybrid HS-RARP approach provides functional outcomes similar to RS-RARP with the early oncologic control of traditional RP-RARP.

Introduction: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a new molecular technique for identifying microorganisms. Treating bacteriuria in patients undergoing stone removal procedures is important for preventing postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI). The objective of this study is to assess the usefulness of preoperative urine NGS testing by comparing NGS with standard urine culture in predicting postoperative UTI after ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from February 16, 2022, to January 11, 2024. Sixty subjects who underwent URSL or PCNL were included. Preoperative voided urine samples were collected for urine culture and tested by MicroGenDX for urine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and urine NGS. Stone specimens obtained intraoperatively were also sent for stone culture and MicrogenDx. Patients were monitored for 4 weeks post-operation for recording clinical outcomes related to infections and complications. Results: Twenty-six (43.3%) male and 34 (56.7%) female participants were included. Twenty-six (43.3%) patients underwent PCNL (15 standard PCNL and 11 mini PCNL), and 34 (56.7%) underwent URSL. Standard urine culture identified positive results in 26 cases (43.3%), PCR for 17 cases (28.3%), and NGS for 31 cases (51.7%). The overall postoperative UTI rate was 6 (10%). Standard urine culture demonstrated a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 57.4%, and accuracy of 56.7%. Positive predictive value (PPV) was notably poor at 11.5%. Urine NGS showed a higher sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 53.7%, accuracy of 55%, and PPV of 16.7%. Conclusion: Urine NGS significantly improves the sensitivity of detecting microorganisms in preoperative urine compared with standard urine culture. Despite its high sensitivity and capability to identify nonculturable bacteria, using NGS alongside standard urine culture is recommended. This parallel approach harnesses the strengths of both methods. Integrating NGS into standard practice could elevate the quality of care, especially for patients at high risk of UTIs, such as those undergoing invasive stone removal procedures.

Introduction: The use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) during ureteroscopy (URS) has been associated with the risk for ureteral injuries. Preoperative administration of α1-blockers presents a potential mitigator of such lesions by inducing ureteral relaxation, which may also contribute to improving other surgical outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing preoperative α1-blockers administration vs its non-use in adult patients without pre-stenting undergoing URS. Binary outcomes were evaluated using risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was measured with the Cochran's Q test, I² statistics, and prediction intervals (PIs). A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was utilized for all outcomes. Results: Eleven studies encompassing 1074 patients undergoing URS were included, of whom 522 (48.60%) received α1-blockers before the procedure. Preoperative α1-blockers were associated with a reduction in significant ureteral injuries (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17-0.53; I² = 6%; PI 0.10-0.88) and an increase in mean successful UAS insertion (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.08-4.23; I² = 23%; PI 0.51-8.93). In patients undergoing exclusively ureteroscopy lithotripsy (URSL), the medications also reduced total complications (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.84; I² = 0%) and complications graded Clavien-Dindo III or higher (RR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.69; I² = 0%), but no significant difference between groups was found in the stone-free rate (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.86-1.40; I² = 91%; PI 0.47-2.59). Conclusion: Preoperative α1-blockers were linked to a decrease in significant ureteral injuries with UAS use and fewer complications during URSL procedures. However, their impact on the successful insertion of a UAS remains uncertain. Consideration of administering preoperative α1-blockers in non-stented adult patients undergoing URS with UAS is advisable.