首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Law in The Built Environment最新文献

英文 中文
Inter-organisational relationship trust repair: a ranked Delphi study with UK professionals 组织间关系信任修复:对英国专业人士的德尔菲排名研究
Pub Date : 2015-09-08 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-08-2014-0024
B. Crossley
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide practical knowledge on how to repair trust within inter-organisational relationships (IORs), and to compare that knowledge to present academic research. IORs have an alarming failure rate upwards of 60 per cent. Although the breakdown of trust is a well-documented critical component of their failure, specific research on IOR trust repair is limited. Design/methodology/approach – The research applied a ranked Delphi study utilising UK professionals’ expertise in IOR management. Findings – The results provide two practical frameworks and several new methods for IOR trust repair; furthermore, they demonstrate consistency between professionally adopted IOR trust repair methods and those proposed academically. Research limitations/implications – The study ' s primary limitations resulted from being conducted at the lower end of its operating window, and only with panellists interested in trust repair. The implications for research are to direct investigations t...
目的-本文的目的是提供关于如何在组织间关系(ior)中修复信任的实用知识,并将这些知识与当前的学术研究进行比较。IOR的失败率高达60%以上,令人震惊。尽管信任的崩溃是其失败的一个有充分记录的关键因素,但对IOR信任修复的具体研究有限。设计/方法/方法-该研究采用了排名德尔菲研究,利用了英国专业人士在IOR管理方面的专业知识。研究结果为IOR信任修复提供了两个实用框架和几种新方法;此外,他们还证明了专业采用的IOR信任修复方法与学术界提出的方法之间的一致性。研究的局限性/启示-该研究的主要局限性是在其操作窗口的低端进行的,并且只有对信任修复感兴趣的小组成员。研究的意义是指导调查……
{"title":"Inter-organisational relationship trust repair: a ranked Delphi study with UK professionals","authors":"B. Crossley","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-08-2014-0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-08-2014-0024","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide practical knowledge on how to repair trust within inter-organisational relationships (IORs), and to compare that knowledge to present academic research. IORs have an alarming failure rate upwards of 60 per cent. Although the breakdown of trust is a well-documented critical component of their failure, specific research on IOR trust repair is limited. Design/methodology/approach – The research applied a ranked Delphi study utilising UK professionals’ expertise in IOR management. Findings – The results provide two practical frameworks and several new methods for IOR trust repair; furthermore, they demonstrate consistency between professionally adopted IOR trust repair methods and those proposed academically. Research limitations/implications – The study ' s primary limitations resulted from being conducted at the lower end of its operating window, and only with panellists interested in trust repair. The implications for research are to direct investigations t...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114595893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Isn’t all loss consequential? 难道所有的损失不都是相应的吗?
Pub Date : 2015-09-08 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0002
A. Connell, J. Mason
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demystify the meaning of the term “consequential loss” in relation to the practice of construction law. Parties may have different understandings of the term and typically an exclusion clause will not solely relate to consequential loss, but will also include other heads of losses for which the party will not be liable for, such as loss of profit, loss of revenue and loss of business. Design/methodology/approach – The question emerges as to whether the term consequential loss has a definitive legal meaning in its own right. This study seeks to ascertain the definition of the term consequential loss within the construction industry through a review of the legal position regarding liability for breach of contract and consequential loss through the consideration of the case law relating to this topic and the associated secondary sources of information. Findings – The study concludes by elucidating a clear interpretation of the term consequential loss and guidance of ...
目的-本文的目的是揭开“间接损失”一词在建筑法实践中的含义。各方可能对该术语有不同的理解,通常情况下,免责条款不仅涉及相应的损失,还将包括各方不承担责任的其他损失,如利润损失、收入损失和业务损失。设计/方法论/方法——随之而来的问题是,“后果性损失”一词本身是否具有明确的法律含义。本研究通过考虑与本主题相关的判例法和相关的二手信息来源,通过审查有关违约责任和相应损失的法律立场,试图确定建筑业中相应损失一词的定义。研究结果-该研究通过阐明对“间接损失”一词的清晰解释和对…
{"title":"Isn’t all loss consequential?","authors":"A. Connell, J. Mason","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demystify the meaning of the term “consequential loss” in relation to the practice of construction law. Parties may have different understandings of the term and typically an exclusion clause will not solely relate to consequential loss, but will also include other heads of losses for which the party will not be liable for, such as loss of profit, loss of revenue and loss of business. Design/methodology/approach – The question emerges as to whether the term consequential loss has a definitive legal meaning in its own right. This study seeks to ascertain the definition of the term consequential loss within the construction industry through a review of the legal position regarding liability for breach of contract and consequential loss through the consideration of the case law relating to this topic and the associated secondary sources of information. Findings – The study concludes by elucidating a clear interpretation of the term consequential loss and guidance of ...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115376265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
When statutes collide: potential recovery of own party adjudication costs 当法规发生冲突时:可能收回的本方裁决费用
Pub Date : 2015-09-08 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-12-2014-0036
Tony Hetherton, J. Charlson
Purpose – This paper aims to examine the potential recovery of own party adjudication costs under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013. The investigation directly applies to England and Wales, but may be relevant to other jurisdictions. Design/methodology/approach – The interaction between The Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013 (derived from European Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment in commercial transactions) and the Local Democracy et al. 2009 including reference to case law was explored. A qualitative research framework was used to collect primary data through semi-structured interviews with experienced construction industry adjudication professionals. Findings – It was discovered that adjudicators are awarding own party costs under the Regulations, but there was disagreement on the issues in both the literature and amongst the interviewees. Research limitations/implications – A definitive judgment is awaited from the Technology and Construction Court. Origi...
目的-本文旨在研究在2013年《商业债务逾期支付条例》下自己一方裁决成本的潜在回收。这项调查直接适用于英格兰和威尔士,但可能与其他司法管辖区有关。设计/方法/方法-探讨了《2013年商业债务逾期付款条例》(源自欧洲关于打击商业交易逾期付款的2011/7/EU指令)与2009年地方民主等人之间的相互作用,包括参考判例法。本研究采用质性研究框架,透过半结构化访谈,与经验丰富的建筑行业评审专业人士收集原始资料。调查结果-调查发现,根据《条例》,审裁人员会支付自己的派对费用,但在文献和受访者之间对这些问题都存在分歧。研究局限/影响-有待科技及建筑法庭的最终判决。的起源……
{"title":"When statutes collide: potential recovery of own party adjudication costs","authors":"Tony Hetherton, J. Charlson","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-12-2014-0036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-12-2014-0036","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to examine the potential recovery of own party adjudication costs under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013. The investigation directly applies to England and Wales, but may be relevant to other jurisdictions. Design/methodology/approach – The interaction between The Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013 (derived from European Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment in commercial transactions) and the Local Democracy et al. 2009 including reference to case law was explored. A qualitative research framework was used to collect primary data through semi-structured interviews with experienced construction industry adjudication professionals. Findings – It was discovered that adjudicators are awarding own party costs under the Regulations, but there was disagreement on the issues in both the literature and amongst the interviewees. Research limitations/implications – A definitive judgment is awaited from the Technology and Construction Court. Origi...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"729 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128518135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The “by right” defence in village green registration 乡村绿化登记中的“权利”抗辩
Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-09-2014-0027
N. Pratt
Purpose – This paper aims to examine the recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court concerning the registration of land as a town or village green (TVG). This area of law has proved contentious over the past decade and shows no sign of relenting. Most recently, in April 2014, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether use that is pursuant to a statutory right could be qualifying use for the purposes of village green registration, which requires 20 years use “as of right”. Design/methodology/approach – The paper starts by summarising the law relating to the registration of land as a TVG and identifies the current problem that the courts are grappling with, namely the “by right” defence. After analysing the two leading authorities in relation to this point, the paper makes a judgment on the operation and conceptual underpinning of the “by right” defence. Findings – The paper concludes that the “by right” defence in the context of village green registration is a functioning concept that prevents the reg...
目的-本文旨在研究最近最高法院关于土地注册为城镇或村庄绿地(TVG)的判例。在过去的十年里,这一法律领域一直存在争议,而且没有任何缓和的迹象。最近,在2014年4月,最高法院被要求确定,根据法定权利的使用是否可以符合村庄绿色登记的资格,这要求使用20年“截至权利”。设计/方法/方法-本文首先概述与土地注册为TVG有关的法律,并指出法院目前正在努力解决的问题,即“正当”辩护。本文在分析了两大权威的相关观点后,对“正当防卫”的运作和概念基础进行了判断。结论:在乡村绿色登记的背景下,“权利”辩护是一个有效的概念,它阻止了乡村绿色登记的合法性。
{"title":"The “by right” defence in village green registration","authors":"N. Pratt","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-09-2014-0027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-09-2014-0027","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to examine the recent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court concerning the registration of land as a town or village green (TVG). This area of law has proved contentious over the past decade and shows no sign of relenting. Most recently, in April 2014, the Supreme Court was asked to determine whether use that is pursuant to a statutory right could be qualifying use for the purposes of village green registration, which requires 20 years use “as of right”. Design/methodology/approach – The paper starts by summarising the law relating to the registration of land as a TVG and identifies the current problem that the courts are grappling with, namely the “by right” defence. After analysing the two leading authorities in relation to this point, the paper makes a judgment on the operation and conceptual underpinning of the “by right” defence. Findings – The paper concludes that the “by right” defence in the context of village green registration is a functioning concept that prevents the reg...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"359 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134227398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Robinhoodian” courts’ decisions on mortgage law in Spain 西班牙“罗宾汉式”法院对抵押贷款法的判决
Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0006
Sergio Nasarre-Aznar
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the response of the Spanish courts to the effects of the 2007 financial crisis for residential mortgage borrowers in the absence of any equivalent intervention by the legislature. The paper also explores the potential risks that recent court decisions might pose for the Spanish mortgage and banking systems. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a combination of doctrinal and comparative methodology. It undertakes an analysis of decided judicial cases in Spain and compares these to international courts’ decisions and to national and international legislation with a view to exploring their originality in the field of mortgage-related consumer protection. Findings – The reviewed cases demonstrate the need to consider legislative reforms to increase the protection of consumers in relation to mortgages. Some reforms took place in 2013, but these were not perceived as sufficient by the judiciary. The paper also highlights the legal uncertainty that has fo...
目的-本文的目的是研究西班牙法院对2007年金融危机对住宅抵押贷款借款人的影响的反应,而立法机构没有进行任何等效的干预。本文还探讨了最近法院判决可能对西班牙抵押贷款和银行体系构成的潜在风险。设计/方法/方法-本文使用理论和比较方法的结合。它对西班牙已判决的司法案件进行分析,并将这些案件与国际法院的判决以及国家和国际立法进行比较,以期探索其在与抵押贷款有关的消费者保护领域的独创性。调查结果-审查的案例表明需要考虑立法改革,以增加对抵押贷款消费者的保护。2013年进行了一些改革,但司法部门认为这些改革还不够。该文件还强调了法律上的不确定性……
{"title":"“Robinhoodian” courts’ decisions on mortgage law in Spain","authors":"Sergio Nasarre-Aznar","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-01-2014-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the response of the Spanish courts to the effects of the 2007 financial crisis for residential mortgage borrowers in the absence of any equivalent intervention by the legislature. The paper also explores the potential risks that recent court decisions might pose for the Spanish mortgage and banking systems. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a combination of doctrinal and comparative methodology. It undertakes an analysis of decided judicial cases in Spain and compares these to international courts’ decisions and to national and international legislation with a view to exploring their originality in the field of mortgage-related consumer protection. Findings – The reviewed cases demonstrate the need to consider legislative reforms to increase the protection of consumers in relation to mortgages. Some reforms took place in 2013, but these were not perceived as sufficient by the judiciary. The paper also highlights the legal uncertainty that has fo...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121833334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Incoherence and incompatibility in planning law 计划法的不连贯和不相容
Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-07-2014-0019
E. Lees, E. Shepherd
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the obligations imposing localism and the presumption in favour of sustainable development in English planning law. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses doctrinal analysis to examine section 38 PCPA 2004 and the NPPF to assess whether the obligations are coherent when considered as stand-alone obligations, and whether they are compatible when combined. Case law and the statutory provisions are examined to assess this. Planning theory is also examined to bring a multidisciplinary focus to the analysis. Findings – The paper concludes that there are problems with these legal obligations when considered as stand-alone obligations. There is imprecision over the meaning of key terms; the “presumptions” established do not operate as true presumptions; and there is an ambiguity as to the hierarchy of norms and the allocation of decision-making control. When combined, the incoherence increases. It is argued that this occurs thanks to underlying disagreement...
目的-本文的目的是分析英国规划法中实施地方主义的义务和有利于可持续发展的推定。设计/方法/方法-本文使用理论分析来检查PCPA 2004第38条和NPPF,以评估这些义务在作为独立义务时是否一致,以及它们在合并时是否兼容。判例法和法定条款进行审查,以评估这一点。规划理论也被检查带来多学科的重点分析。调查结果-本文的结论是,将这些法律义务视为独立义务时存在问题。关键术语的含义不精确;建立的“假设”不能作为真正的假设运作;规范的层级和决策权的分配也存在歧义。当两者结合时,不相干性增加。有人认为,这是由于潜在的分歧造成的。
{"title":"Incoherence and incompatibility in planning law","authors":"E. Lees, E. Shepherd","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-07-2014-0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-07-2014-0019","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the obligations imposing localism and the presumption in favour of sustainable development in English planning law. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses doctrinal analysis to examine section 38 PCPA 2004 and the NPPF to assess whether the obligations are coherent when considered as stand-alone obligations, and whether they are compatible when combined. Case law and the statutory provisions are examined to assess this. Planning theory is also examined to bring a multidisciplinary focus to the analysis. Findings – The paper concludes that there are problems with these legal obligations when considered as stand-alone obligations. There is imprecision over the meaning of key terms; the “presumptions” established do not operate as true presumptions; and there is an ambiguity as to the hierarchy of norms and the allocation of decision-making control. When combined, the incoherence increases. It is argued that this occurs thanks to underlying disagreement...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121992473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
From Warwick to Westminster: some reflections on law in action 从沃里克到威斯敏斯特:对现行法律的一些思考
Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-05-2015-0011
Francis King
{"title":"From Warwick to Westminster: some reflections on law in action","authors":"Francis King","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-05-2015-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-05-2015-0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117200354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anti-social behaviour and European protection against eviction 反社会行为和欧洲对驱逐的保护
Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-08-2014-0021
Michel Vols, P. Tassenaar, J. Jacobs
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the implementation of the minimum level of protection against the loss of the home that arises from Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in The Netherlands. The paper focuses on anti-social behaviour-related cases in which the landlord requests the court to issue an eviction order. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a statistical analysis of nearly 250 judgements concerning housing-related anti-social behaviour. Findings – A significant difference is found in the court’s attitude against drug-related anti-social behaviour and other types of nuisance. Moreover, it is found that in two-thirds of the cases, the tenant advanced a proportionality defence. Although the European Court stresses the need of a proportionality check, the Dutch courts ignore the tenant’s proportionality defence in 10 per cent of the cases and issue an eviction order in the majority of all cases. Advancing a proportionality defence does not result in any...
目的-本文的目的是评估在荷兰执行《欧洲人权公约》第8条规定的防止丧失住房的最低保护水平的情况。本文主要研究房东要求法院发出驱逐令的反社会行为案件。设计/方法/方法-本文基于对近250项与住房有关的反社会行为的判决的统计分析。调查结果-法庭对待与毒品有关的反社会行为及其他滋扰行为的态度有显著差异。此外,发现在三分之二的案件中,承租人提出了相称性辩护。虽然欧洲法院强调有必要进行相称性检查,但荷兰法院在10%的案件中无视承租人的相称性辩护,并在大多数案件中发出驱逐令。提出相称性辩护不会导致任何…
{"title":"Anti-social behaviour and European protection against eviction","authors":"Michel Vols, P. Tassenaar, J. Jacobs","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-08-2014-0021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-08-2014-0021","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the implementation of the minimum level of protection against the loss of the home that arises from Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in The Netherlands. The paper focuses on anti-social behaviour-related cases in which the landlord requests the court to issue an eviction order. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a statistical analysis of nearly 250 judgements concerning housing-related anti-social behaviour. Findings – A significant difference is found in the court’s attitude against drug-related anti-social behaviour and other types of nuisance. Moreover, it is found that in two-thirds of the cases, the tenant advanced a proportionality defence. Although the European Court stresses the need of a proportionality check, the Dutch courts ignore the tenant’s proportionality defence in 10 per cent of the cases and issue an eviction order in the majority of all cases. Advancing a proportionality defence does not result in any...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121433651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Adjudication in tenancy deposit scheme disputes: agents’ perspectives 租赁按金计划纠纷的裁决:代理人的观点
Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-09-2014-0026
Julian Sidoli del Ceno, H. George, Michel Vols
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine empirically the operation of tenancy deposit protection within England and Wales. The paper consciously focuses solely on the views and perspectives of letting agents operating in the various schemes. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a series of semi-structured qualitative interviews with lettings agents in two distinct geographical urban areas, Birmingham and South Wales. Participants were selected for their market presence within a given area and the fact that they were all members of approved regulatory schemes. Findings – Overall, most agents were broadly happy with the process and considered adjudication to be an appropriate form of resolution for tenancy deposit disputes given the often small monetary value of the disputes and the large volume of cases. Concerns were raised, however, regarding the heavy bureaucratic burden placed on agents and on the perceived evidential burden on the landlord. There being a widely held view that a...
目的-本文的目的是实证研究租赁押金保护在英格兰和威尔士的运作。本文有意识地只关注让代理人在各种方案中运作的观点和观点。设计/方法/方法-本文基于对伯明翰和南威尔士两个不同地理城市地区的房屋中介进行的一系列半结构化定性访谈。选择参与者是因为他们在特定地区的市场存在,而且他们都是经批准的管理计划的成员。调查结果-总体而言,大多数代理商对这一过程大致满意,并认为裁决是解决租赁押金纠纷的适当形式,因为纠纷的货币价值通常很小,而案件数量却很大。但是,有人对代理人身上沉重的官僚负担和房东所认为的举证负担表示关切。人们普遍认为……
{"title":"Adjudication in tenancy deposit scheme disputes: agents’ perspectives","authors":"Julian Sidoli del Ceno, H. George, Michel Vols","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-09-2014-0026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-09-2014-0026","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine empirically the operation of tenancy deposit protection within England and Wales. The paper consciously focuses solely on the views and perspectives of letting agents operating in the various schemes. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a series of semi-structured qualitative interviews with lettings agents in two distinct geographical urban areas, Birmingham and South Wales. Participants were selected for their market presence within a given area and the fact that they were all members of approved regulatory schemes. Findings – Overall, most agents were broadly happy with the process and considered adjudication to be an appropriate form of resolution for tenancy deposit disputes given the often small monetary value of the disputes and the large volume of cases. Concerns were raised, however, regarding the heavy bureaucratic burden placed on agents and on the perceived evidential burden on the landlord. There being a widely held view that a...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124619331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
‘Temporary’ relocation: spaces of contradiction in South African law “临时”搬迁:南非法律中的矛盾空间
Pub Date : 2015-04-10 DOI: 10.1108/IJLBE-12-2013-0041
Duncan Ranslem
Purpose – This study aims to examine how temporary relocation areas (TRAs), urban forms that facilitate evictions and forced relocations, have been written into South African legal and governmental structures through contested urban planning and legal regimes. Design/methodology/approach – Proceeding from the macro-scale of TRAs spread across the nation, to the mezzo-scale of the Delft Symphony Way TRA in Cape Town, to the micro-scale of an individual “blikkie” (housing unit) within this camp, the article looks at the form and function of the TRA in urban resettlement practices. Special attention is given to relocation areas’ designation as “temporary” spaces and the consequences of this temporal designation in law and on the ground. Findings – These sites have developed as technologies for negotiating competing demands on the state, and their presence foregrounds some of the deeply rooted contradictions in post-apartheid South Africa. They are places both within and apart from the city, often managed by ...
目的-本研究旨在研究如何通过有争议的城市规划和法律制度,将促进驱逐和强制搬迁的城市形式临时安置区(TRAs)写入南非的法律和政府结构。设计/方法/方法-从遍布全国的TRA的宏观规模,到开普敦代尔夫特交响乐之路TRA的中尺度,再到营地内单个“blikkie”(住房单元)的微观尺度,本文着眼于TRA在城市安置实践中的形式和功能。特别注意将重新安置区指定为“临时”空间,以及这种临时指定在法律上和实地造成的后果。这些网站已经发展成为对国家竞争性要求进行谈判的技术,它们的存在凸显了后种族隔离时期南非一些根深蒂固的矛盾。它们是城市内外的地方,通常由……
{"title":"‘Temporary’ relocation: spaces of contradiction in South African law","authors":"Duncan Ranslem","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-12-2013-0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-12-2013-0041","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This study aims to examine how temporary relocation areas (TRAs), urban forms that facilitate evictions and forced relocations, have been written into South African legal and governmental structures through contested urban planning and legal regimes. Design/methodology/approach – Proceeding from the macro-scale of TRAs spread across the nation, to the mezzo-scale of the Delft Symphony Way TRA in Cape Town, to the micro-scale of an individual “blikkie” (housing unit) within this camp, the article looks at the form and function of the TRA in urban resettlement practices. Special attention is given to relocation areas’ designation as “temporary” spaces and the consequences of this temporal designation in law and on the ground. Findings – These sites have developed as technologies for negotiating competing demands on the state, and their presence foregrounds some of the deeply rooted contradictions in post-apartheid South Africa. They are places both within and apart from the city, often managed by ...","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124912328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
期刊
International Journal of Law in The Built Environment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1