首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Intensive Care最新文献

英文 中文
Strategies for discontinuing vasopressin and norepinephrine during the recovery phase of shock: a single-center retrospective study. 休克恢复期停用加压素和去甲肾上腺素的策略:一项单中心回顾性研究。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00823-w
Shiho Suganuma, Shigehiko Uchino, Seiya Nishiyama, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Shinshu Katayama

Background: The optimal strategy for discontinuing arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine in patients recovering from shock remains uncertain. Although prior studies have suggested a higher risk of hypotension when arginine vasopressin is discontinued first, these findings may have been influenced by baseline imbalances and tapering practices. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether the order of discontinuation between arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine was associated with the incidence of hypotension during the recovery phase of shock, with vasopressor end doses converted to norepinephrine equivalents for analysis.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit patients with shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine from August 2017 to March 2024. Patients were categorized based on whether arginine vasopressin or norepinephrine was discontinued first. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 24 h of vasopressor cessation, defined as mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg requiring a ≥ 25% increase in the remaining vasopressor, reinstitution of the stopped agent, or a bolus of ≥ 500 mL crystalloid or 25 g albumin. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was applied to adjust for baseline imbalances both in the overall cohort and in the septic shock subgroup. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic model, including baseline characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and vasopressor end doses in norepinephrine equivalents.

Results: A total of 524 patients were analyzed, with 293 discontinuing AVP first and 231 discontinuing NE first. In the unadjusted cohorts, hypotension occurred in 19% of the AVP-first group and 26% of the NE-first group. After overlap weighting, all baseline covariates were balanced between the groups, and the incidence of hypotension was not significantly different (19% vs 21%, P = 0.59). In the septic shock subgroup (n = 267), the weighted analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between groups.

Conclusions: In patients recovering from shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine, discontinuing arginine vasopressin first was not associated with a higher risk of hypotension.

背景:休克恢复期患者停用精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素的最佳策略仍不确定。虽然先前的研究表明,先停用精氨酸抗利尿激素时低血压的风险更高,但这些发现可能受到基线失衡和逐渐减量的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,评估精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素之间的停药顺序是否与休克恢复期低血压的发生率相关,并将加压素结束剂量转换为去甲肾上腺素当量进行分析。方法:对2017年8月至2024年3月同时接受精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素治疗的重症监护病房休克患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。根据先停用精氨酸抗利尿激素还是去甲肾上腺素对患者进行分类。主要终点是血管加压药停止后24小时内低血压的发生率,定义为平均动脉压。结果:共分析了524例患者,其中293例首先停止AVP治疗,231例首先停止NE治疗。在未调整的队列中,AVP-first组的低血压发生率为19%,NE-first组为26%。重叠加权后,两组间所有基线协变量均平衡,低血压发生率无显著差异(19% vs 21%, P = 0.59)。在脓毒性休克亚组(n = 267),加权分析显示两组间低血压发生率无显著差异。结论:在接受精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素治疗的休克恢复期患者中,首先停用精氨酸加压素与低血压的高风险无关。
{"title":"Strategies for discontinuing vasopressin and norepinephrine during the recovery phase of shock: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Shiho Suganuma, Shigehiko Uchino, Seiya Nishiyama, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Shinshu Katayama","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00823-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00823-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal strategy for discontinuing arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine in patients recovering from shock remains uncertain. Although prior studies have suggested a higher risk of hypotension when arginine vasopressin is discontinued first, these findings may have been influenced by baseline imbalances and tapering practices. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether the order of discontinuation between arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine was associated with the incidence of hypotension during the recovery phase of shock, with vasopressor end doses converted to norepinephrine equivalents for analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit patients with shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine from August 2017 to March 2024. Patients were categorized based on whether arginine vasopressin or norepinephrine was discontinued first. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 24 h of vasopressor cessation, defined as mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg requiring a ≥ 25% increase in the remaining vasopressor, reinstitution of the stopped agent, or a bolus of ≥ 500 mL crystalloid or 25 g albumin. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was applied to adjust for baseline imbalances both in the overall cohort and in the septic shock subgroup. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic model, including baseline characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and vasopressor end doses in norepinephrine equivalents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 patients were analyzed, with 293 discontinuing AVP first and 231 discontinuing NE first. In the unadjusted cohorts, hypotension occurred in 19% of the AVP-first group and 26% of the NE-first group. After overlap weighting, all baseline covariates were balanced between the groups, and the incidence of hypotension was not significantly different (19% vs 21%, P = 0.59). In the septic shock subgroup (n = 267), the weighted analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients recovering from shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine, discontinuing arginine vasopressin first was not associated with a higher risk of hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expert consensus statement on the evaluation, treatment, and transfer of cardiogenic shock using a Delphi method approach: a report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4 CS). 关于采用德尔菲法评估、治疗和转移心源性休克的专家共识声明:日本重症监护心脏病学委员会(J4 CS)的一份报告。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00791-1
Takahiro Nakashima, Toru Kondo, Jun Nakata, Keita Saku, Shoji Kawakami, Masanari Kuwabara, Takeshi Yamamoto, Migaku Kikuchi, Ichiro Takeuchi, Kuniya Asai, Naoki Sato
{"title":"Expert consensus statement on the evaluation, treatment, and transfer of cardiogenic shock using a Delphi method approach: a report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4 CS).","authors":"Takahiro Nakashima, Toru Kondo, Jun Nakata, Keita Saku, Shoji Kawakami, Masanari Kuwabara, Takeshi Yamamoto, Migaku Kikuchi, Ichiro Takeuchi, Kuniya Asai, Naoki Sato","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00791-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00791-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Classifying diarrhea in critically ill patients through various criteria: a cohort study. 通过不同标准对危重患者腹泻进行分类:一项队列研究。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00824-9
Ryohei Yamamoto, Hajime Yamazaki, Takatoshi Koroki, Yuna Ueta, Ryo Ueno, Yosuke Yamamoto

Background: The absence of consensus criteria for diarrhea in critically ill patients poses challenges, including an uncertain prevalence and inconsistent findings regarding the impact of diarrhea on mortality. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of diarrhea, the agreement among different diagnostic criteria, and their association with mortality.

Methods: A single-center cohort study was conducted among consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least three days between January 2017 and December 2018. The six diarrhea criteria evaluated were based on frequency, quantity, and consistency. These included the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) criteria (≥ 3 times and > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool), the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (≥ 3 times loose or liquid stool), the Bristol Stool Chart Scale (BSCS) score of 6 or 7, and other quantity- or frequency-based definitions. Outcomes included: (1) prevalence of diarrhea according to each definition, (2) agreement between criteria, and (3) association between diarrhea and in-hospital mortality. Associations were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, yielding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Among 700 participants, 61% were men; the median age was 71 years. The prevalence of diarrhea ranged from 9 to 39%, depending on the criteria used. The WHO and ESICM criteria showed similar prevalences (18.7% and 15.1%, respectively) and high agreement (Kappa 0.87). However, both had weak agreement with the BSCS criteria (prevalence 39.3%; Kappa 0.52 and 0.43, respectively). In univariable analyses, the presence of diarrhea was associated with in-hospital mortality, regardless of the criteria used. In multivariable analyses, only the > 400 g/day loose or liquid stool, > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool, and BSCS criteria maintained this association; the adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.93 (1.29‒2.90), 1.78 (1.19‒2.64), and 1.73 (1.15‒2.60), respectively.

Conclusions: Diarrhea prevalence varied from 9-39% across definitions. WHO and ESICM, both frequency‑based, differed from BSCS and weight‑based criteria. Given the difficulty of accurate frequency counting in ICU patients, consistency‑ or weight‑based definitions may offer a more practical alternative for both clinical practice and research.

背景:缺乏对危重患者腹泻的一致标准提出了挑战,包括不确定的患病率和关于腹泻对死亡率影响的不一致的发现。本研究旨在探讨腹泻的患病率,不同诊断标准之间的一致性,以及它们与死亡率的关系。方法:在2017年1月至2018年12月期间连续入住重症监护病房(ICU)至少3天的成年患者中进行单中心队列研究。评估的6个腹泻标准是基于频率、数量和一致性。这些标准包括欧洲重症医学会(ESICM)标准(≥3次和200克/天稀便或液体便),世界卫生组织(WHO)标准(≥3次稀便或液体便),布里斯托尔大便量表(BSCS)评分为6或7,以及其他基于数量或频率的定义。结果包括:(1)根据每个定义的腹泻患病率,(2)标准之间的一致性,以及(3)腹泻与住院死亡率之间的关联。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估相关性,得出风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在700名参与者中,61%是男性;中位年龄为71岁。根据所采用的标准,腹泻的患病率从9%到39%不等。WHO和ESICM标准显示相似的患病率(分别为18.7%和15.1%)和高一致性(Kappa 0.87)。然而,两者与BSCS标准的一致性较弱(患病率39.3%;Kappa分别为0.52和0.43)。在单变量分析中,无论采用何种标准,腹泻的存在都与住院死亡率相关。在多变量分析中,只有> 400 g/天稀便或液体便,> 200 g/天稀便或液体便和BSCS标准保持这种关联;校正后的hr (95% CI)分别为1.93(1.29-2.90)、1.78(1.19-2.64)和1.73(1.15-2.60)。结论:不同定义的腹泻患病率从9-39%不等。WHO和ESICM均基于频率,不同于BSCS和基于体重的标准。考虑到ICU患者准确频率计数的困难,基于一致性或权重的定义可能为临床实践和研究提供更实用的选择。
{"title":"Classifying diarrhea in critically ill patients through various criteria: a cohort study.","authors":"Ryohei Yamamoto, Hajime Yamazaki, Takatoshi Koroki, Yuna Ueta, Ryo Ueno, Yosuke Yamamoto","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00824-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00824-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The absence of consensus criteria for diarrhea in critically ill patients poses challenges, including an uncertain prevalence and inconsistent findings regarding the impact of diarrhea on mortality. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of diarrhea, the agreement among different diagnostic criteria, and their association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center cohort study was conducted among consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least three days between January 2017 and December 2018. The six diarrhea criteria evaluated were based on frequency, quantity, and consistency. These included the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) criteria (≥ 3 times and > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool), the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (≥ 3 times loose or liquid stool), the Bristol Stool Chart Scale (BSCS) score of 6 or 7, and other quantity- or frequency-based definitions. Outcomes included: (1) prevalence of diarrhea according to each definition, (2) agreement between criteria, and (3) association between diarrhea and in-hospital mortality. Associations were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, yielding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 700 participants, 61% were men; the median age was 71 years. The prevalence of diarrhea ranged from 9 to 39%, depending on the criteria used. The WHO and ESICM criteria showed similar prevalences (18.7% and 15.1%, respectively) and high agreement (Kappa 0.87). However, both had weak agreement with the BSCS criteria (prevalence 39.3%; Kappa 0.52 and 0.43, respectively). In univariable analyses, the presence of diarrhea was associated with in-hospital mortality, regardless of the criteria used. In multivariable analyses, only the > 400 g/day loose or liquid stool, > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool, and BSCS criteria maintained this association; the adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.93 (1.29‒2.90), 1.78 (1.19‒2.64), and 1.73 (1.15‒2.60), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diarrhea prevalence varied from 9-39% across definitions. WHO and ESICM, both frequency‑based, differed from BSCS and weight‑based criteria. Given the difficulty of accurate frequency counting in ICU patients, consistency‑ or weight‑based definitions may offer a more practical alternative for both clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in internal jugular vein respiratory variation during tidal volume challenge predict volume responsiveness in lumbar surgery under protective ventilation: a prospective cohort study. 一项前瞻性队列研究:潮气量挑战期间颈内静脉呼吸变化预测保护性通气下腰椎手术的容量反应性。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00821-y
Mimi Wu, Jie Xu, Xiaojie Liu, Yuanyuan Dong, Yu'e Sun, Xiaoping Gu, Jinhua Bo

Background: Internal jugular vein respiratory variation (IJVV) has been proposed as a dynamic predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, its utility is limited in patients with low tidal volume (Vt) ventilation in the prone position. We conducted this study to determine whether a transient increase in Vt from 6 to 8 ml kg-1 of the predicted body weight (PBW), which is the "tidal volume challenge (TVC)", improves the feasibility of the IJVV in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery ventilated with a low Vt.

Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in the operating room. Patients were studied at baseline (a Vt of 6 ml kg-1 PBW), during a 1 min increase in the Vt to 8 ml kg-1 of the PBW, during a 1 min shift to the Trendelenburg maneuver, and after fluid administration. Baseline values of the IJVV, pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) [IJVV6, PPV6, and SVV6, respectively], and the changes in the IJVV during a TVC (ΔIJVV6-8) were measured. The change in cardiac index during a Trendelenburg maneuver (ΔCItrend) was also recorded. Volume responsiveness was defined by a ΔCItrend ≥ 8%. The primary outcome was determination of the ΔIJVV6-8 in predicting volume responsiveness during low Vt ventilation in the prone position. The secondary outcomes included an estimation of the IJVV6, PPV6, and SVV6 diagnostic performances in predicting volume responsiveness in this surgical setting.

Results: Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 (50.82%) of whom were deemed volume responsive. The ΔIJVV6-8 predicted volume responsiveness with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99; P < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 96.77% and a specificity of 86.67%. In addition, the AUC for ΔIJVV6-8 was significantly higher than that for IJVV6, PPV6, and SVV6, as confirmed by DeLong's test (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions: In patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery with low Vt ventilation, changes in IJVV during a TVC effectively predict volume responsiveness and are more reliable than IJVV, PPV, and SVV in this surgical context.

背景:颈内静脉呼吸变异(IJVV)被认为是液体反应性的动态预测指标。然而,在俯卧位低潮气量(Vt)通气的患者中,其效用有限。我们进行了这项研究,以确定Vt从预测体重(PBW)的6到8 ml kg-1的短暂增加,即“潮气量挑战(TVC)”,是否提高了低Vt通气后路腰椎手术患者IJVV的可行性。方法:这是一项在手术室进行的前瞻性研究。研究患者在基线时(Vt为6 ml kg-1 PBW),在Vt增加至8 ml kg-1 PBW 1分钟期间,在转向Trendelenburg操作1分钟期间,以及在液体给药后。测量IJVV的基线值、脉压变化(PPV)和行程体积变化(SVV)[分别为IJVV6、PPV6和SVV6],以及TVC期间IJVV的变化(ΔIJVV6-8)。同时记录Trendelenburg操作时心脏指数的变化(ΔCItrend)。容量反应性以ΔCItrend≥8%来定义。主要结果是确定ΔIJVV6-8在预测俯卧位低Vt通气时的容量反应性。次要结果包括IJVV6、PPV6和SVV6诊断性能在预测该手术环境中容量反应性的估计。结果:61例患者纳入研究,其中31例(50.82%)被认为是容量反应。ΔIJVV6-8预测容量反应性的受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), P 6-8显著高于IJVV6、PPV6和SVV6, DeLong检验证实了这一点(P = 0.04, P)。结论:在低Vt通气的后路腰椎手术患者中,TVC期间IJVV的变化能有效预测容量反应性,在该手术背景下,IJVV的变化比IJVV、PPV和SVV更可靠。
{"title":"Changes in internal jugular vein respiratory variation during tidal volume challenge predict volume responsiveness in lumbar surgery under protective ventilation: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Mimi Wu, Jie Xu, Xiaojie Liu, Yuanyuan Dong, Yu'e Sun, Xiaoping Gu, Jinhua Bo","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00821-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00821-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal jugular vein respiratory variation (IJVV) has been proposed as a dynamic predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, its utility is limited in patients with low tidal volume (Vt) ventilation in the prone position. We conducted this study to determine whether a transient increase in Vt from 6 to 8 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> of the predicted body weight (PBW), which is the \"tidal volume challenge (TVC)\", improves the feasibility of the IJVV in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery ventilated with a low Vt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study conducted in the operating room. Patients were studied at baseline (a Vt of 6 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> PBW), during a 1 min increase in the Vt to 8 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> of the PBW, during a 1 min shift to the Trendelenburg maneuver, and after fluid administration. Baseline values of the IJVV, pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) [IJVV<sub>6</sub>, PPV<sub>6</sub>, and SVV<sub>6</sub>, respectively], and the changes in the IJVV during a TVC (ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub>) were measured. The change in cardiac index during a Trendelenburg maneuver (ΔCI<sub>trend</sub>) was also recorded. Volume responsiveness was defined by a ΔCI<sub>trend</sub> ≥ 8%. The primary outcome was determination of the ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub> in predicting volume responsiveness during low Vt ventilation in the prone position. The secondary outcomes included an estimation of the IJVV<sub>6</sub>, PPV<sub>6</sub>, and SVV<sub>6</sub> diagnostic performances in predicting volume responsiveness in this surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 (50.82%) of whom were deemed volume responsive. The ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub> predicted volume responsiveness with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99; P < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 96.77% and a specificity of 86.67%. In addition, the AUC for ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub> was significantly higher than that for IJVV<sub>6</sub>, PPV<sub>6</sub>, and SVV<sub>6</sub>, as confirmed by DeLong's test (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery with low Vt ventilation, changes in IJVV during a TVC effectively predict volume responsiveness and are more reliable than IJVV, PPV, and SVV in this surgical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nationwide survey of adherence to the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 in the initial management of sepsis. 在脓毒症的初始治疗中,遵守《日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南2024》的全国性调查。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00819-6
Takehiko Oami, Daisuke Kasugai, Kazuma Yamakawa, Tadashi Matsuoka, Kenichi Kano, Yoshitaka Aoki, Tomoaki Yatabe, Nobuaki Shime, Taka-Aki Nakada

Background: The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 (J-SSCG2024) were developed to improve the standardization and quality of sepsis care across various clinical settings. However, real-world adherence to these recommendations among healthcare professionals in Japan remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess patterns of adherence to the J-SSCG2024 and identify factors associated with variation in clinical practice.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey targeting healthcare professionals, administering a questionnaire that included 23 items reflecting the key J-SSCG2024 recommendations for the initial management of sepsis, along with demographic and professional background information. Cluster analysis was performed to identify the distinct adherence patterns. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the association between respondent characteristics and guideline compliance. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings across distinct cluster numbers.

Results: A total of 734 healthcare professionals participated in the survey, most of whom were physicians (92.4%) with over 20 years of clinical experience (54.0%). High adherence was observed for recommendations, such as blood purification and the use of first-line vasopressors. However, substantial variation was detected in practices related to adjuvant therapies and initial resuscitation, particularly regarding the timing of vasopressor initiation and the use of beta-blockers. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct adherence profiles. Higher adherence was associated with expertise in emergency and critical care medicine, affiliation with intensive care units or emergency departments, and a higher number of patients with sepsis managed monthly. These findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: This nationwide survey identified characteristic clusters based on adherence to the J-SSCG2024 among Japanese clinicians. Targeted implementation strategies are essential to enhance guideline adoption, particularly among clinicians outside specialized critical care settings.

背景:日本败血症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南2024 (J-SSCG2024)的制定是为了提高各种临床环境中败血症护理的标准化和质量。然而,日本医疗保健专业人员对这些建议的实际依从性仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估J-SSCG2024的依从性模式,并确定与临床实践变化相关的因素。方法:我们针对医疗保健专业人员进行了一项全国性的基于网络的横断面调查,管理一份问卷,其中包括23个项目,反映了J-SSCG2024对败血症初始管理的关键建议,以及人口统计学和专业背景信息。进行聚类分析以确定不同的粘附模式。亚组分析探讨被调查者特征与指南依从性之间的关系。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以评估不同簇数的结果的稳健性。结果:共有734名卫生保健专业人员参与调查,其中临床经验20年以上的医生居多(92.4%),占54.0%。高依从性观察到的建议,如血液净化和使用一线血管加压药物。然而,在辅助治疗和初始复苏相关的实践中发现了实质性的变化,特别是关于血管加压素启动的时间和β受体阻滞剂的使用。聚类分析显示了四种不同的依从性特征。较高的依从性与急诊和重症监护医学方面的专业知识、与重症监护病房或急诊科的联系以及每月处理脓毒症患者数量的增加有关。这些发现在敏感性分析中是一致的。结论:这项全国性调查根据日本临床医生对J-SSCG2024的依从性确定了特征集群。有针对性的实施策略对于提高指南的采用至关重要,特别是在专业重症监护环境之外的临床医生中。
{"title":"Nationwide survey of adherence to the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 in the initial management of sepsis.","authors":"Takehiko Oami, Daisuke Kasugai, Kazuma Yamakawa, Tadashi Matsuoka, Kenichi Kano, Yoshitaka Aoki, Tomoaki Yatabe, Nobuaki Shime, Taka-Aki Nakada","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00819-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00819-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 (J-SSCG2024) were developed to improve the standardization and quality of sepsis care across various clinical settings. However, real-world adherence to these recommendations among healthcare professionals in Japan remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess patterns of adherence to the J-SSCG2024 and identify factors associated with variation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey targeting healthcare professionals, administering a questionnaire that included 23 items reflecting the key J-SSCG2024 recommendations for the initial management of sepsis, along with demographic and professional background information. Cluster analysis was performed to identify the distinct adherence patterns. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the association between respondent characteristics and guideline compliance. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings across distinct cluster numbers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 734 healthcare professionals participated in the survey, most of whom were physicians (92.4%) with over 20 years of clinical experience (54.0%). High adherence was observed for recommendations, such as blood purification and the use of first-line vasopressors. However, substantial variation was detected in practices related to adjuvant therapies and initial resuscitation, particularly regarding the timing of vasopressor initiation and the use of beta-blockers. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct adherence profiles. Higher adherence was associated with expertise in emergency and critical care medicine, affiliation with intensive care units or emergency departments, and a higher number of patients with sepsis managed monthly. These findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide survey identified characteristic clusters based on adherence to the J-SSCG2024 among Japanese clinicians. Targeted implementation strategies are essential to enhance guideline adoption, particularly among clinicians outside specialized critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482439/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term recovery of sensorimotor functions and prediction of participation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study. 危重疾病幸存者感觉运动功能的长期恢复和参与预测:一项前瞻性队列研究。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00808-9
Johanna Weghorn, Melanie Finsterhölzl, Franziska Wippenbeck, Klaus Jahn, Marion Egger, Jeannine Bergmann

Background: Survivors of critical illness frequently face physical, cognitive and psychological impairments after intensive care. Sensorimotor impairments potentially have a negative impact on participation. However, comprehensive understanding of sensorimotor recovery and participation in survivors of critical illness is limited. Therefore, the aims of this study were to quantify long-term sensorimotor recovery in survivors of critical illness, to examine participation in daily life 1.5 years after illness onset, and to assess the predictive capacity of sensorimotor assessments for future participation.

Methods: Survivors of critical illness who were mechanically ventilated ≥ 5 days on the ICU and who were admitted with weakness to neurorehabilitation were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. Time effects on sensation, muscle strength, balance, walking and dexterity were described at admission to and at discharge from rehabilitation, and 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Participation was assessed with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. A multiple linear regression with sensorimotor outcomes at rehabilitation admission was conducted to find predictive associations with participation. The model was compared to an extended regression model containing demographic variables and factors known to be associated with participation or quality of life.

Results: All sensorimotor outcomes among participants (n = 250, median age 63 (54-73) years) improved over time. However, in most patients some deficits remained after rehabilitation and on long-term follow-up. Good participation (≥ 75%) was achieved by 60.2% of survivors 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Concerning participation, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) together with the Box-and-Block-Test, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand-Test, and the Medical Research Council score at rehabilitation admission formed a predictive model (R2 = 0.157, p < 0.001). The extended regression analysis resulted in a model (R2 = 0.357, p < 0.001) with the variables depression, duration of mechanical ventilation, cognitive function, Mini-BESTest, comorbidities, sex and cerebral lesion.

Conclusions: We observed significant improvements in sensorimotor function, albeit with lingering deficits in sensation, strength, balance, dexterity and participation. Sensorimotor functions at rehabilitation start have limited explanatory power in predicting participation 1.5 years after disease onset. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00021753. Date of registration: September 03, 2020.

背景:重症幸存者在重症监护后经常面临身体、认知和心理障碍。感觉运动障碍对参与有潜在的负面影响。然而,对感觉运动恢复和参与危重疾病幸存者的全面了解是有限的。因此,本研究的目的是量化危重疾病幸存者的长期感觉运动恢复,检查疾病发作后1.5年的日常生活参与情况,并评估感觉运动评估对未来参与的预测能力。方法:将ICU机械通气≥5天且因神经康复虚弱入院的危重患者纳入本单中心前瞻性队列研究。时间对感觉、肌肉力量、平衡、行走和灵活性的影响分别在康复入院和出院时以及危重疾病发作后1.5年进行描述。通过回归正常生活指数对参与情况进行评估。对康复入院时的感觉运动结果进行多元线性回归,以发现参与的预测关联。将该模型与包含人口变量和已知与参与或生活质量相关的因素的扩展回归模型进行比较。结果:参与者(n = 250,中位年龄63(54-73)岁)的所有感觉运动结果随着时间的推移而改善。然而,大多数患者在康复后和长期随访中仍然存在一些缺陷。60.2%的幸存者在危重疾病发生1.5年后达到了良好的参与率(≥75%)。在参与方面,迷你平衡评估系统测试(Mini- bestest)与盒块测试、五次坐立测试和康复入院时医学研究委员会评分形成预测模型(R2 = 0.157, p 2 = 0.357, p)。结论:我们观察到感觉运动功能有显著改善,尽管感觉、力量、平衡、灵巧和参与方面仍存在缺陷。康复开始时的感觉运动功能在预测疾病发病1.5年后的参与方面解释力有限。德国临床试验注册,DRKS00021753。注册日期:2020年9月3日。
{"title":"Long-term recovery of sensorimotor functions and prediction of participation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Johanna Weghorn, Melanie Finsterhölzl, Franziska Wippenbeck, Klaus Jahn, Marion Egger, Jeannine Bergmann","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00808-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00808-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of critical illness frequently face physical, cognitive and psychological impairments after intensive care. Sensorimotor impairments potentially have a negative impact on participation. However, comprehensive understanding of sensorimotor recovery and participation in survivors of critical illness is limited. Therefore, the aims of this study were to quantify long-term sensorimotor recovery in survivors of critical illness, to examine participation in daily life 1.5 years after illness onset, and to assess the predictive capacity of sensorimotor assessments for future participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survivors of critical illness who were mechanically ventilated ≥ 5 days on the ICU and who were admitted with weakness to neurorehabilitation were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. Time effects on sensation, muscle strength, balance, walking and dexterity were described at admission to and at discharge from rehabilitation, and 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Participation was assessed with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. A multiple linear regression with sensorimotor outcomes at rehabilitation admission was conducted to find predictive associations with participation. The model was compared to an extended regression model containing demographic variables and factors known to be associated with participation or quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All sensorimotor outcomes among participants (n = 250, median age 63 (54-73) years) improved over time. However, in most patients some deficits remained after rehabilitation and on long-term follow-up. Good participation (≥ 75%) was achieved by 60.2% of survivors 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Concerning participation, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) together with the Box-and-Block-Test, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand-Test, and the Medical Research Council score at rehabilitation admission formed a predictive model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.157, p < 0.001). The extended regression analysis resulted in a model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.357, p < 0.001) with the variables depression, duration of mechanical ventilation, cognitive function, Mini-BESTest, comorbidities, sex and cerebral lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed significant improvements in sensorimotor function, albeit with lingering deficits in sensation, strength, balance, dexterity and participation. Sensorimotor functions at rehabilitation start have limited explanatory power in predicting participation 1.5 years after disease onset. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00021753. Date of registration: September 03, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145029862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plasma endostatin and its association with new-onset acute kidney injury in critical care. 血浆内皮抑素及其与重症监护新发急性肾损伤的关系。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00820-z
Hazem Koozi, Jonas Engström, Anders Larsson, Martin Spångfors, Hans Friberg, Attila Frigyesi

Background: Endostatin is a promising biomarker for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated plasma endostatin levels at ICU admission as predictors of new-onset AKI within 48 h after ICU admission, renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 7 days after ICU admission, and 30-day mortality.

Methods: A retrospective multicentre study was performed with admissions to four ICUs. Blood samples were prospectively obtained at ICU admission and retrospectively analysed. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria defined AKI. Endostatin at ICU admission was compared to and adjusted for creatinine, cystatin C, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3). Regression models and mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) from repeated cross-validation were assessed.

Results: In total, 4732 admissions were included. Endostatin was associated with new-onset AKI (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 - 1.9), new-onset stage 3 AKI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.6), and RRT (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.4) independently of creatinine, cystatin C, and SAPS-3. Endostatin was superior to creatinine and cystatin C in predicting new-onset AKI (mean AUC 0.67 vs. 0.63, p < 0.001). Adding endostatin to creatinine improved the prediction of new-onset AKI and new-onset stage 3 AKI, but not the need for RRT. Endostatin was not associated with 30-day mortality after adjusting for the SAPS-3 score.

Conclusions: Endostatin at ICU admission is an independent predictor of new-onset AKI and may improve early AKI risk assessment in the ICU. However, its predictive value for RRT and 30-day mortality appears limited. External validation and studies on its clinical utility are warranted.

背景:内皮抑素是预测重症监护病房(ICU)急性肾损伤(AKI)和死亡率的一种有前景的生物标志物。我们研究了ICU入院时血浆内皮抑素水平作为ICU入院后48小时内新发AKI、ICU入院后7天内肾脏替代治疗(RRT)和30天死亡率的预测因子。方法:对4例icu患者进行回顾性多中心研究。在ICU入院时前瞻性采集血样并进行回顾性分析。肾脏疾病:改善全球预后(KDIGO)标准定义AKI。比较ICU入院时的内皮抑素,并根据肌酐、胱抑素C和简化急性生理评分3 (SAPS-3)进行调整。评估反复交叉验证的回归模型和受试者工作特征曲线下的平均面积。结果:共纳入4732例患者。内皮抑素与新发AKI (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 - 1.9)、新发3期AKI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.6)和RRT (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.4)相关,与肌酐、胱抑素C和SAPS-3无关。内皮抑素在预测新发AKI方面优于肌酐和胱抑素C(平均AUC 0.67 vs 0.63, p)。结论:ICU入院时内皮抑素是新发AKI的独立预测因子,可改善ICU早期AKI风险评估。然而,其对RRT和30天死亡率的预测价值似乎有限。对其临床应用的外部验证和研究是必要的。
{"title":"Plasma endostatin and its association with new-onset acute kidney injury in critical care.","authors":"Hazem Koozi, Jonas Engström, Anders Larsson, Martin Spångfors, Hans Friberg, Attila Frigyesi","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00820-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00820-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endostatin is a promising biomarker for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated plasma endostatin levels at ICU admission as predictors of new-onset AKI within 48 h after ICU admission, renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 7 days after ICU admission, and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre study was performed with admissions to four ICUs. Blood samples were prospectively obtained at ICU admission and retrospectively analysed. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria defined AKI. Endostatin at ICU admission was compared to and adjusted for creatinine, cystatin C, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3). Regression models and mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) from repeated cross-validation were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4732 admissions were included. Endostatin was associated with new-onset AKI (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.9), new-onset stage 3 AKI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.6), and RRT (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05 <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.4) independently of creatinine, cystatin C, and SAPS-3. Endostatin was superior to creatinine and cystatin C in predicting new-onset AKI (mean AUC 0.67 vs. 0.63, p < 0.001). Adding endostatin to creatinine improved the prediction of new-onset AKI and new-onset stage 3 AKI, but not the need for RRT. Endostatin was not associated with 30-day mortality after adjusting for the SAPS-3 score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endostatin at ICU admission is an independent predictor of new-onset AKI and may improve early AKI risk assessment in the ICU. However, its predictive value for RRT and 30-day mortality appears limited. External validation and studies on its clinical utility are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403487/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of clinical research priorities in Asian intensive care units (ERA-ICU). 亚洲重症监护病房(ERA-ICU)临床研究重点评估
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00816-9
Andrew Li, Prashant Nasa, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Abdulrahman Al-Fares, Ming-Cheng Chan, Young-Jae Cho, Moritoki Egi, Mohammad Omar Faruq, Carine Harmouche, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian, Ayman Kharaba, Aidos Konkayev, Faisal Muchtar, Khalid Mahmood Khan Nafees, Mendsaikhan Naranpurev, Do Ngoc Son, Pauline Yeung Ng, Mohd Basri Mat-Nor, Jose Emmanuel Palo, Mehmet Uyar, Zhongheng Zhang, Jigeeshu Divatia, Jason Phua, Yaseen M Arabi, Lowell Ling

Background: Practice and delivery of critical care in Asia varies according to healthcare structure, income setting, and cultural factors. Identifying research priorities specific to ICU patients and healthcare workers in Asia is needed to guide advancement of critical care in the region.

Methods: This was an international cross-sectional survey study with adapted methods from nominal group techniques. All members of the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials (ACCCT) Group were invited to submit research question suggestions. Submitted research questions were combined into summarized research questions, grouped into research themes, and individually ranked by number of mentions based on the original question submission (popularity). National and Regional Representatives rated the top 15% most popular summarized research questions by pre-defined importance and feasibility criteria.

Results: Between September 20, 2024 and December 10, 2024, 160 of 228 general members of the ACCCT Group (response rate 70.2%) participated in this survey study. The participants were from 112 hospitals across 24 countries and regions within Asia. Participants submitted 408 research questions, which were categorized into 15 themes and combined into 197 summarized research questions. The top three themes, as ranked by the number of mentions, were infection/sepsis, general ICU care, and structure/training/staffing/teamwork/safety. A threshold of 4 mentions was used to identify 26 summarized research questions that represented the top 15% most popular questions. Research questions related to sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome were ranked most important and feasible across the region.

Conclusion: Twenty-six of the most popular research questions in critical care were identified by Asian ICU workers and researchers to drive research agenda in Asia for the next decade.

背景:在亚洲,重症监护的实践和交付因医疗结构、收入环境和文化因素而异。需要确定针对亚洲ICU患者和医护人员的研究重点,以指导该地区重症监护的发展。方法:这是一项国际横断面调查研究,采用了名义群体技术的改编方法。亚洲重症临床试验(ACCCT)小组的所有成员被邀请提交研究问题建议。提交的研究问题被合并为总结研究问题,分组为研究主题,并根据原始问题提交的提及次数(受欢迎程度)单独排名。国家和地区代表根据预先定义的重要性和可行性标准对前15%最受欢迎的总结研究问题进行了评级。结果:在2024年9月20日至2024年12月10日期间,ACCCT集团228名普通会员中有160人参与了本次调查研究,回复率为70.2%。参与者来自亚洲24个国家和地区的112家医院。参与者提交了408个研究问题,这些问题分为15个主题,并合并为197个总结研究问题。按提及次数排名前三的主题分别是感染/败血症、普通ICU护理和结构/培训/人员配置/团队合作/安全。使用4次提及的阈值来确定26个总结的研究问题,这些问题代表了最受欢迎的前15%的问题。与败血症和急性呼吸窘迫综合征相关的研究问题在该地区被列为最重要和最可行的。结论:亚洲ICU工作人员和研究人员确定了危重病护理中最受欢迎的26个研究问题,以推动亚洲未来十年的研究议程。
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical research priorities in Asian intensive care units (ERA-ICU).","authors":"Andrew Li, Prashant Nasa, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Abdulrahman Al-Fares, Ming-Cheng Chan, Young-Jae Cho, Moritoki Egi, Mohammad Omar Faruq, Carine Harmouche, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian, Ayman Kharaba, Aidos Konkayev, Faisal Muchtar, Khalid Mahmood Khan Nafees, Mendsaikhan Naranpurev, Do Ngoc Son, Pauline Yeung Ng, Mohd Basri Mat-Nor, Jose Emmanuel Palo, Mehmet Uyar, Zhongheng Zhang, Jigeeshu Divatia, Jason Phua, Yaseen M Arabi, Lowell Ling","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00816-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00816-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice and delivery of critical care in Asia varies according to healthcare structure, income setting, and cultural factors. Identifying research priorities specific to ICU patients and healthcare workers in Asia is needed to guide advancement of critical care in the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an international cross-sectional survey study with adapted methods from nominal group techniques. All members of the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials (ACCCT) Group were invited to submit research question suggestions. Submitted research questions were combined into summarized research questions, grouped into research themes, and individually ranked by number of mentions based on the original question submission (popularity). National and Regional Representatives rated the top 15% most popular summarized research questions by pre-defined importance and feasibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 20, 2024 and December 10, 2024, 160 of 228 general members of the ACCCT Group (response rate 70.2%) participated in this survey study. The participants were from 112 hospitals across 24 countries and regions within Asia. Participants submitted 408 research questions, which were categorized into 15 themes and combined into 197 summarized research questions. The top three themes, as ranked by the number of mentions, were infection/sepsis, general ICU care, and structure/training/staffing/teamwork/safety. A threshold of 4 mentions was used to identify 26 summarized research questions that represented the top 15% most popular questions. Research questions related to sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome were ranked most important and feasible across the region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twenty-six of the most popular research questions in critical care were identified by Asian ICU workers and researchers to drive research agenda in Asia for the next decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal timing for assessing post-intensive care syndrome in clinical research: a scoping review and expert survey. 临床研究中评估重症监护后综合征的最佳时机:范围审查和专家调查。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00817-8
Kohei Tanaka, Nobuto Nakanishi, Keibun Liu, Kyohei Miyamoto, Akira Kawauchi, Masatsugu Okamura, Sho Katayama, Yuki Iida, Yusuke Kawai, Junji Hatakeyama, Toru Hifumi, Takeshi Unoki, Daisuke Kawakami, Fumimasa Amaya, Kengo Obata, Hidenori Sumita, Tomoyuki Morisawa, Norihiko Tsuboi, Ryo Kozu, Shunsuke Takaki, Junpei Haruna, Kohei Ota, Yoshihisa Fujinami, Nobuyuki Nosaka, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shigeaki Inoue, Osamu Nishida, Kensuke Nakamura

Background: Since the concept of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) was proposed, numerous studies have assessed patients and their family members. However, a wide range of assessment timings has been employed across previous studies. This study aimed to clarify how assessment timings have been implemented in existing PICS research through a scoping review, and to explore expert opinions on optimal assessment timing via an online survey.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of studies assessing PICS-related outcomes, including physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments, as well as PICS in family members. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL, and screened by two independent pairs of reviewers. Eligible studies were published between January 2014 and December 2022. Studies lacking a clear description of assessment timing were excluded. We analyzed the reference point used to determine assessment schedules, the assessment time points, and their frequency. Additionally, an online questionnaire was administered to 23 members of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine PICS committee and working group members to collect expert opinions on these three aspects for clinical research.

Results: A total of 657 studies were included. In prior studies, hospital discharge was the most commonly used reference point for determining assessment schedule (240 studies, 40%). However, ICU discharge was identified by experts as the ideal reference point (16 votes, 47%). The most frequently used assessment time points were 3 months (262, 23%), 6 months (212, 19%), and 12 months (206, 18%) post-discharge. Experts most commonly selected the period between 6 and 12 months as the optimal time point for assessment. While single assessments were most common in previous studies (337, 51%), experts considered three assessments to be ideal (12, 44%).

Conclusions: This study revealed notable discrepancies between the assessment timing reported in previous studies and the opinions of experts regarding optimal timing. Standardization of assessment timing in PICS research is warranted to enhance methodological consistency and comparability.

背景:自从重症监护后综合征(PICS)的概念被提出以来,许多研究对患者及其家属进行了评估。然而,在以往的研究中,评估时间的范围很广。本研究旨在通过范围审查澄清评估时间在现有PICS研究中的实施情况,并通过在线调查探讨专家对最佳评估时间的意见。方法:我们对评估PICS相关结果的研究进行了范围综述,包括身体、认知和心理损伤,以及家庭成员的PICS。研究从MEDLINE、CENTRAL和CINAHL检索,并由两对独立的审稿人筛选。符合条件的研究发表于2014年1月至2022年12月之间。缺乏评估时间清晰描述的研究被排除在外。我们分析了用于确定评估时间表的参考点、评估时间点和它们的频率。并对23名日本重症医学学会PICS委员会委员和工作组成员进行在线问卷调查,收集专家对这三方面的意见,用于临床研究。结果:共纳入657项研究。在以往的研究中,出院是确定评估计划最常用的参考点(240项研究,40%)。然而,专家们认为ICU出院是理想的参考点(16票,47%)。最常用的评估时间点为出院后3个月(262例,23%)、6个月(212例,19%)和12个月(206例,18%)。专家们通常选择6至12个月作为评估的最佳时间点。虽然单一评估在以前的研究中最常见(337,51%),但专家认为三次评估是理想的(12,44%)。结论:本研究揭示了以往研究报告的评估时机与专家关于最佳时机的意见存在显著差异。PICS研究中评估时间的标准化是必要的,以增强方法的一致性和可比性。
{"title":"Optimal timing for assessing post-intensive care syndrome in clinical research: a scoping review and expert survey.","authors":"Kohei Tanaka, Nobuto Nakanishi, Keibun Liu, Kyohei Miyamoto, Akira Kawauchi, Masatsugu Okamura, Sho Katayama, Yuki Iida, Yusuke Kawai, Junji Hatakeyama, Toru Hifumi, Takeshi Unoki, Daisuke Kawakami, Fumimasa Amaya, Kengo Obata, Hidenori Sumita, Tomoyuki Morisawa, Norihiko Tsuboi, Ryo Kozu, Shunsuke Takaki, Junpei Haruna, Kohei Ota, Yoshihisa Fujinami, Nobuyuki Nosaka, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shigeaki Inoue, Osamu Nishida, Kensuke Nakamura","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00817-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00817-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the concept of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) was proposed, numerous studies have assessed patients and their family members. However, a wide range of assessment timings has been employed across previous studies. This study aimed to clarify how assessment timings have been implemented in existing PICS research through a scoping review, and to explore expert opinions on optimal assessment timing via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of studies assessing PICS-related outcomes, including physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments, as well as PICS in family members. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL, and screened by two independent pairs of reviewers. Eligible studies were published between January 2014 and December 2022. Studies lacking a clear description of assessment timing were excluded. We analyzed the reference point used to determine assessment schedules, the assessment time points, and their frequency. Additionally, an online questionnaire was administered to 23 members of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine PICS committee and working group members to collect expert opinions on these three aspects for clinical research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 657 studies were included. In prior studies, hospital discharge was the most commonly used reference point for determining assessment schedule (240 studies, 40%). However, ICU discharge was identified by experts as the ideal reference point (16 votes, 47%). The most frequently used assessment time points were 3 months (262, 23%), 6 months (212, 19%), and 12 months (206, 18%) post-discharge. Experts most commonly selected the period between 6 and 12 months as the optimal time point for assessment. While single assessments were most common in previous studies (337, 51%), experts considered three assessments to be ideal (12, 44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed notable discrepancies between the assessment timing reported in previous studies and the opinions of experts regarding optimal timing. Standardization of assessment timing in PICS research is warranted to enhance methodological consistency and comparability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preliminary application of the Sharesource connect data collection and analysis system in the management of continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Sharesource connect数据采集分析系统在重症监护病房持续肾替代治疗管理中的初步应用。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00818-7
Wensan Wu, Jianli Wang, Chen Chen, Junqi Feng, Shuyi Zhang, An Shi, Jing Zhang, Xinyi He, Jiangchen Peng, Mingli Zhu

Background: This study investigated the application of software-based data monitoring for quality control (QC) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) management.

Methods: This single-center pre-post intervention study, conducted in three ICUs of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, compared outcomes before (Jan-Dec 2023) and after (Jan-Dec 2024) implementing the Sharesource Connect system. Data from 9 Prismaflex CRRT machines were collected retrospectively during 2023 and prospectively on a monthly basis during 2024. Alongside the software, a comprehensive quality improvement program: (1) multidisciplinary team collaboration; (2) data-driven QC; and (3) structured training. Primary outcomes-filter lifespan, downtime percentage, delivered/prescribed dose ratio, ultrafiltration volume, and vascular access alarms-were compared.

Results: A total of 798 filters from 514 patients (2023) and 717 filters from 492 patients (2024) were analyzed. Key quality metrics improved significantly following implementation (2024 vs. 2023): Filter lifespan increased significantly from 20.08 ± 4.12 h to 24.08 ± 4.27 h (P = 0.043), Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved filter survival (Log-Rank p < 0.001). Cumulative survival increased from 2023 to 2024 at key time points: 12 h (69.1%-87.2%, + 18.1%), 24 h (30.9%-34.6%, + 3.7%), and 36 h (5.6%-13.6%, + 8.0%), with consistent improvements observed. Downtime percentage decreased from 39 to 28% (P = 0.015), reducing non-effective treatment time by 11 percentage points. The delivered/prescribed dose ratio increased from 82 to 86% (P = 0.046). The mean delivered dose was 35.67 ± 4.01 mL/kg/h (prescribed: 41.33 ± 4.5 mL/kg/h). Ultrafiltration volume remained stable (3.13 ± 0.37 vs. 3.52 ± 0.44 L/treatment day, P = 0.058). There was no significant difference in vascular access alarms (3.39 ± 1.44 vs. 2.93 ± 0.73 events/day, P = 0.392).

Conclusion: The Sharesource Connect system could be used for the monitoring, collection, and analysis of CRRT data to assist in the QC management related to CRRT, so as to provide a software basis for further multi-center studies or random control trials on the intelligent management of critical patients undergoing CRRT.

背景:本研究探讨了基于软件的数据监测在持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)管理中的应用。方法:本研究在上海某三级医院的3个icu进行单中心干预前后研究,比较实施Sharesource Connect系统前(2023年1月- 12月)和实施后(2024年1月- 12月)的结果。2023年回顾性收集9台Prismaflex CRRT机器的数据,2024年每月前瞻性收集数据。除了软件之外,还有一个全面的质量改进方案:(1)多学科团队协作;(2)数据驱动QC;(3)结构化培训。主要结果——过滤器寿命、停机时间百分比、交付/处方剂量比、超滤体积和血管通路警报——进行了比较。结果:共分析514例患者(2023例)的798个过滤器和492例患者(2024例)的717个过滤器。关键质量指标在实施后显著改善(2024年vs. 2023年):过滤器寿命从20.08±4.12小时显著增加到24.08±4.27小时(P = 0.043), Kaplan-Meier分析显示过滤器存活率提高(Log-Rank P)。Sharesource Connect系统可用于CRRT数据的监测、采集和分析,辅助CRRT相关的QC管理,为进一步开展CRRT重症患者智能管理的多中心研究或随机对照试验提供软件基础。
{"title":"Preliminary application of the Sharesource connect data collection and analysis system in the management of continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Wensan Wu, Jianli Wang, Chen Chen, Junqi Feng, Shuyi Zhang, An Shi, Jing Zhang, Xinyi He, Jiangchen Peng, Mingli Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00818-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00818-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the application of software-based data monitoring for quality control (QC) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center pre-post intervention study, conducted in three ICUs of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, compared outcomes before (Jan-Dec 2023) and after (Jan-Dec 2024) implementing the Sharesource Connect system. Data from 9 Prismaflex CRRT machines were collected retrospectively during 2023 and prospectively on a monthly basis during 2024. Alongside the software, a comprehensive quality improvement program: (1) multidisciplinary team collaboration; (2) data-driven QC; and (3) structured training. Primary outcomes-filter lifespan, downtime percentage, delivered/prescribed dose ratio, ultrafiltration volume, and vascular access alarms-were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 798 filters from 514 patients (2023) and 717 filters from 492 patients (2024) were analyzed. Key quality metrics improved significantly following implementation (2024 vs. 2023): Filter lifespan increased significantly from 20.08 ± 4.12 h to 24.08 ± 4.27 h (P = 0.043), Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved filter survival (Log-Rank p < 0.001). Cumulative survival increased from 2023 to 2024 at key time points: 12 h (69.1%-87.2%, + 18.1%), 24 h (30.9%-34.6%, + 3.7%), and 36 h (5.6%-13.6%, + 8.0%), with consistent improvements observed. Downtime percentage decreased from 39 to 28% (P = 0.015), reducing non-effective treatment time by 11 percentage points. The delivered/prescribed dose ratio increased from 82 to 86% (P = 0.046). The mean delivered dose was 35.67 ± 4.01 mL/kg/h (prescribed: 41.33 ± 4.5 mL/kg/h). Ultrafiltration volume remained stable (3.13 ± 0.37 vs. 3.52 ± 0.44 L/treatment day, P = 0.058). There was no significant difference in vascular access alarms (3.39 ± 1.44 vs. 2.93 ± 0.73 events/day, P = 0.392).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Sharesource Connect system could be used for the monitoring, collection, and analysis of CRRT data to assist in the QC management related to CRRT, so as to provide a software basis for further multi-center studies or random control trials on the intelligent management of critical patients undergoing CRRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1