Background: The optimal strategy for discontinuing arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine in patients recovering from shock remains uncertain. Although prior studies have suggested a higher risk of hypotension when arginine vasopressin is discontinued first, these findings may have been influenced by baseline imbalances and tapering practices. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether the order of discontinuation between arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine was associated with the incidence of hypotension during the recovery phase of shock, with vasopressor end doses converted to norepinephrine equivalents for analysis.
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit patients with shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine from August 2017 to March 2024. Patients were categorized based on whether arginine vasopressin or norepinephrine was discontinued first. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 24 h of vasopressor cessation, defined as mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg requiring a ≥ 25% increase in the remaining vasopressor, reinstitution of the stopped agent, or a bolus of ≥ 500 mL crystalloid or 25 g albumin. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was applied to adjust for baseline imbalances both in the overall cohort and in the septic shock subgroup. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic model, including baseline characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and vasopressor end doses in norepinephrine equivalents.
Results: A total of 524 patients were analyzed, with 293 discontinuing AVP first and 231 discontinuing NE first. In the unadjusted cohorts, hypotension occurred in 19% of the AVP-first group and 26% of the NE-first group. After overlap weighting, all baseline covariates were balanced between the groups, and the incidence of hypotension was not significantly different (19% vs 21%, P = 0.59). In the septic shock subgroup (n = 267), the weighted analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between groups.
Conclusions: In patients recovering from shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine, discontinuing arginine vasopressin first was not associated with a higher risk of hypotension.
背景:休克恢复期患者停用精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素的最佳策略仍不确定。虽然先前的研究表明,先停用精氨酸抗利尿激素时低血压的风险更高,但这些发现可能受到基线失衡和逐渐减量的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,评估精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素之间的停药顺序是否与休克恢复期低血压的发生率相关,并将加压素结束剂量转换为去甲肾上腺素当量进行分析。方法:对2017年8月至2024年3月同时接受精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素治疗的重症监护病房休克患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。根据先停用精氨酸抗利尿激素还是去甲肾上腺素对患者进行分类。主要终点是血管加压药停止后24小时内低血压的发生率,定义为平均动脉压。结果:共分析了524例患者,其中293例首先停止AVP治疗,231例首先停止NE治疗。在未调整的队列中,AVP-first组的低血压发生率为19%,NE-first组为26%。重叠加权后,两组间所有基线协变量均平衡,低血压发生率无显著差异(19% vs 21%, P = 0.59)。在脓毒性休克亚组(n = 267),加权分析显示两组间低血压发生率无显著差异。结论:在接受精氨酸加压素和去甲肾上腺素治疗的休克恢复期患者中,首先停用精氨酸加压素与低血压的高风险无关。
{"title":"Strategies for discontinuing vasopressin and norepinephrine during the recovery phase of shock: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Shiho Suganuma, Shigehiko Uchino, Seiya Nishiyama, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Shinshu Katayama","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00823-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00823-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal strategy for discontinuing arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine in patients recovering from shock remains uncertain. Although prior studies have suggested a higher risk of hypotension when arginine vasopressin is discontinued first, these findings may have been influenced by baseline imbalances and tapering practices. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether the order of discontinuation between arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine was associated with the incidence of hypotension during the recovery phase of shock, with vasopressor end doses converted to norepinephrine equivalents for analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit patients with shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine from August 2017 to March 2024. Patients were categorized based on whether arginine vasopressin or norepinephrine was discontinued first. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension within 24 h of vasopressor cessation, defined as mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg requiring a ≥ 25% increase in the remaining vasopressor, reinstitution of the stopped agent, or a bolus of ≥ 500 mL crystalloid or 25 g albumin. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was applied to adjust for baseline imbalances both in the overall cohort and in the septic shock subgroup. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic model, including baseline characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and vasopressor end doses in norepinephrine equivalents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 524 patients were analyzed, with 293 discontinuing AVP first and 231 discontinuing NE first. In the unadjusted cohorts, hypotension occurred in 19% of the AVP-first group and 26% of the NE-first group. After overlap weighting, all baseline covariates were balanced between the groups, and the incidence of hypotension was not significantly different (19% vs 21%, P = 0.59). In the septic shock subgroup (n = 267), the weighted analysis showed no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients recovering from shock who received both arginine vasopressin and norepinephrine, discontinuing arginine vasopressin first was not associated with a higher risk of hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Expert consensus statement on the evaluation, treatment, and transfer of cardiogenic shock using a Delphi method approach: a report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4 CS).","authors":"Takahiro Nakashima, Toru Kondo, Jun Nakata, Keita Saku, Shoji Kawakami, Masanari Kuwabara, Takeshi Yamamoto, Migaku Kikuchi, Ichiro Takeuchi, Kuniya Asai, Naoki Sato","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00791-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00791-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The absence of consensus criteria for diarrhea in critically ill patients poses challenges, including an uncertain prevalence and inconsistent findings regarding the impact of diarrhea on mortality. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of diarrhea, the agreement among different diagnostic criteria, and their association with mortality.
Methods: A single-center cohort study was conducted among consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least three days between January 2017 and December 2018. The six diarrhea criteria evaluated were based on frequency, quantity, and consistency. These included the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) criteria (≥ 3 times and > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool), the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (≥ 3 times loose or liquid stool), the Bristol Stool Chart Scale (BSCS) score of 6 or 7, and other quantity- or frequency-based definitions. Outcomes included: (1) prevalence of diarrhea according to each definition, (2) agreement between criteria, and (3) association between diarrhea and in-hospital mortality. Associations were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, yielding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Among 700 participants, 61% were men; the median age was 71 years. The prevalence of diarrhea ranged from 9 to 39%, depending on the criteria used. The WHO and ESICM criteria showed similar prevalences (18.7% and 15.1%, respectively) and high agreement (Kappa 0.87). However, both had weak agreement with the BSCS criteria (prevalence 39.3%; Kappa 0.52 and 0.43, respectively). In univariable analyses, the presence of diarrhea was associated with in-hospital mortality, regardless of the criteria used. In multivariable analyses, only the > 400 g/day loose or liquid stool, > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool, and BSCS criteria maintained this association; the adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.93 (1.29‒2.90), 1.78 (1.19‒2.64), and 1.73 (1.15‒2.60), respectively.
Conclusions: Diarrhea prevalence varied from 9-39% across definitions. WHO and ESICM, both frequency‑based, differed from BSCS and weight‑based criteria. Given the difficulty of accurate frequency counting in ICU patients, consistency‑ or weight‑based definitions may offer a more practical alternative for both clinical practice and research.
{"title":"Classifying diarrhea in critically ill patients through various criteria: a cohort study.","authors":"Ryohei Yamamoto, Hajime Yamazaki, Takatoshi Koroki, Yuna Ueta, Ryo Ueno, Yosuke Yamamoto","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00824-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00824-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The absence of consensus criteria for diarrhea in critically ill patients poses challenges, including an uncertain prevalence and inconsistent findings regarding the impact of diarrhea on mortality. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of diarrhea, the agreement among different diagnostic criteria, and their association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center cohort study was conducted among consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least three days between January 2017 and December 2018. The six diarrhea criteria evaluated were based on frequency, quantity, and consistency. These included the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) criteria (≥ 3 times and > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool), the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (≥ 3 times loose or liquid stool), the Bristol Stool Chart Scale (BSCS) score of 6 or 7, and other quantity- or frequency-based definitions. Outcomes included: (1) prevalence of diarrhea according to each definition, (2) agreement between criteria, and (3) association between diarrhea and in-hospital mortality. Associations were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, yielding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 700 participants, 61% were men; the median age was 71 years. The prevalence of diarrhea ranged from 9 to 39%, depending on the criteria used. The WHO and ESICM criteria showed similar prevalences (18.7% and 15.1%, respectively) and high agreement (Kappa 0.87). However, both had weak agreement with the BSCS criteria (prevalence 39.3%; Kappa 0.52 and 0.43, respectively). In univariable analyses, the presence of diarrhea was associated with in-hospital mortality, regardless of the criteria used. In multivariable analyses, only the > 400 g/day loose or liquid stool, > 200 g/day loose or liquid stool, and BSCS criteria maintained this association; the adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 1.93 (1.29‒2.90), 1.78 (1.19‒2.64), and 1.73 (1.15‒2.60), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diarrhea prevalence varied from 9-39% across definitions. WHO and ESICM, both frequency‑based, differed from BSCS and weight‑based criteria. Given the difficulty of accurate frequency counting in ICU patients, consistency‑ or weight‑based definitions may offer a more practical alternative for both clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-30DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00821-y
Mimi Wu, Jie Xu, Xiaojie Liu, Yuanyuan Dong, Yu'e Sun, Xiaoping Gu, Jinhua Bo
Background: Internal jugular vein respiratory variation (IJVV) has been proposed as a dynamic predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, its utility is limited in patients with low tidal volume (Vt) ventilation in the prone position. We conducted this study to determine whether a transient increase in Vt from 6 to 8 ml kg-1 of the predicted body weight (PBW), which is the "tidal volume challenge (TVC)", improves the feasibility of the IJVV in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery ventilated with a low Vt.
Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in the operating room. Patients were studied at baseline (a Vt of 6 ml kg-1 PBW), during a 1 min increase in the Vt to 8 ml kg-1 of the PBW, during a 1 min shift to the Trendelenburg maneuver, and after fluid administration. Baseline values of the IJVV, pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) [IJVV6, PPV6, and SVV6, respectively], and the changes in the IJVV during a TVC (ΔIJVV6-8) were measured. The change in cardiac index during a Trendelenburg maneuver (ΔCItrend) was also recorded. Volume responsiveness was defined by a ΔCItrend ≥ 8%. The primary outcome was determination of the ΔIJVV6-8 in predicting volume responsiveness during low Vt ventilation in the prone position. The secondary outcomes included an estimation of the IJVV6, PPV6, and SVV6 diagnostic performances in predicting volume responsiveness in this surgical setting.
Results: Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 (50.82%) of whom were deemed volume responsive. The ΔIJVV6-8 predicted volume responsiveness with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99; P < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 96.77% and a specificity of 86.67%. In addition, the AUC for ΔIJVV6-8 was significantly higher than that for IJVV6, PPV6, and SVV6, as confirmed by DeLong's test (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.01, respectively).
Conclusions: In patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery with low Vt ventilation, changes in IJVV during a TVC effectively predict volume responsiveness and are more reliable than IJVV, PPV, and SVV in this surgical context.
背景:颈内静脉呼吸变异(IJVV)被认为是液体反应性的动态预测指标。然而,在俯卧位低潮气量(Vt)通气的患者中,其效用有限。我们进行了这项研究,以确定Vt从预测体重(PBW)的6到8 ml kg-1的短暂增加,即“潮气量挑战(TVC)”,是否提高了低Vt通气后路腰椎手术患者IJVV的可行性。方法:这是一项在手术室进行的前瞻性研究。研究患者在基线时(Vt为6 ml kg-1 PBW),在Vt增加至8 ml kg-1 PBW 1分钟期间,在转向Trendelenburg操作1分钟期间,以及在液体给药后。测量IJVV的基线值、脉压变化(PPV)和行程体积变化(SVV)[分别为IJVV6、PPV6和SVV6],以及TVC期间IJVV的变化(ΔIJVV6-8)。同时记录Trendelenburg操作时心脏指数的变化(ΔCItrend)。容量反应性以ΔCItrend≥8%来定义。主要结果是确定ΔIJVV6-8在预测俯卧位低Vt通气时的容量反应性。次要结果包括IJVV6、PPV6和SVV6诊断性能在预测该手术环境中容量反应性的估计。结果:61例患者纳入研究,其中31例(50.82%)被认为是容量反应。ΔIJVV6-8预测容量反应性的受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), P 6-8显著高于IJVV6、PPV6和SVV6, DeLong检验证实了这一点(P = 0.04, P)。结论:在低Vt通气的后路腰椎手术患者中,TVC期间IJVV的变化能有效预测容量反应性,在该手术背景下,IJVV的变化比IJVV、PPV和SVV更可靠。
{"title":"Changes in internal jugular vein respiratory variation during tidal volume challenge predict volume responsiveness in lumbar surgery under protective ventilation: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Mimi Wu, Jie Xu, Xiaojie Liu, Yuanyuan Dong, Yu'e Sun, Xiaoping Gu, Jinhua Bo","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00821-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00821-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal jugular vein respiratory variation (IJVV) has been proposed as a dynamic predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, its utility is limited in patients with low tidal volume (Vt) ventilation in the prone position. We conducted this study to determine whether a transient increase in Vt from 6 to 8 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> of the predicted body weight (PBW), which is the \"tidal volume challenge (TVC)\", improves the feasibility of the IJVV in patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery ventilated with a low Vt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study conducted in the operating room. Patients were studied at baseline (a Vt of 6 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> PBW), during a 1 min increase in the Vt to 8 ml kg<sup>-1</sup> of the PBW, during a 1 min shift to the Trendelenburg maneuver, and after fluid administration. Baseline values of the IJVV, pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume variation (SVV) [IJVV<sub>6</sub>, PPV<sub>6</sub>, and SVV<sub>6</sub>, respectively], and the changes in the IJVV during a TVC (ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub>) were measured. The change in cardiac index during a Trendelenburg maneuver (ΔCI<sub>trend</sub>) was also recorded. Volume responsiveness was defined by a ΔCI<sub>trend</sub> ≥ 8%. The primary outcome was determination of the ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub> in predicting volume responsiveness during low Vt ventilation in the prone position. The secondary outcomes included an estimation of the IJVV<sub>6</sub>, PPV<sub>6</sub>, and SVV<sub>6</sub> diagnostic performances in predicting volume responsiveness in this surgical setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 (50.82%) of whom were deemed volume responsive. The ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub> predicted volume responsiveness with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI 0.88-0.99; P < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 96.77% and a specificity of 86.67%. In addition, the AUC for ΔIJVV<sub>6-8</sub> was significantly higher than that for IJVV<sub>6</sub>, PPV<sub>6</sub>, and SVV<sub>6</sub>, as confirmed by DeLong's test (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery with low Vt ventilation, changes in IJVV during a TVC effectively predict volume responsiveness and are more reliable than IJVV, PPV, and SVV in this surgical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 (J-SSCG2024) were developed to improve the standardization and quality of sepsis care across various clinical settings. However, real-world adherence to these recommendations among healthcare professionals in Japan remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess patterns of adherence to the J-SSCG2024 and identify factors associated with variation in clinical practice.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey targeting healthcare professionals, administering a questionnaire that included 23 items reflecting the key J-SSCG2024 recommendations for the initial management of sepsis, along with demographic and professional background information. Cluster analysis was performed to identify the distinct adherence patterns. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the association between respondent characteristics and guideline compliance. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings across distinct cluster numbers.
Results: A total of 734 healthcare professionals participated in the survey, most of whom were physicians (92.4%) with over 20 years of clinical experience (54.0%). High adherence was observed for recommendations, such as blood purification and the use of first-line vasopressors. However, substantial variation was detected in practices related to adjuvant therapies and initial resuscitation, particularly regarding the timing of vasopressor initiation and the use of beta-blockers. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct adherence profiles. Higher adherence was associated with expertise in emergency and critical care medicine, affiliation with intensive care units or emergency departments, and a higher number of patients with sepsis managed monthly. These findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: This nationwide survey identified characteristic clusters based on adherence to the J-SSCG2024 among Japanese clinicians. Targeted implementation strategies are essential to enhance guideline adoption, particularly among clinicians outside specialized critical care settings.
{"title":"Nationwide survey of adherence to the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 in the initial management of sepsis.","authors":"Takehiko Oami, Daisuke Kasugai, Kazuma Yamakawa, Tadashi Matsuoka, Kenichi Kano, Yoshitaka Aoki, Tomoaki Yatabe, Nobuaki Shime, Taka-Aki Nakada","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00819-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00819-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024 (J-SSCG2024) were developed to improve the standardization and quality of sepsis care across various clinical settings. However, real-world adherence to these recommendations among healthcare professionals in Japan remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess patterns of adherence to the J-SSCG2024 and identify factors associated with variation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey targeting healthcare professionals, administering a questionnaire that included 23 items reflecting the key J-SSCG2024 recommendations for the initial management of sepsis, along with demographic and professional background information. Cluster analysis was performed to identify the distinct adherence patterns. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the association between respondent characteristics and guideline compliance. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings across distinct cluster numbers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 734 healthcare professionals participated in the survey, most of whom were physicians (92.4%) with over 20 years of clinical experience (54.0%). High adherence was observed for recommendations, such as blood purification and the use of first-line vasopressors. However, substantial variation was detected in practices related to adjuvant therapies and initial resuscitation, particularly regarding the timing of vasopressor initiation and the use of beta-blockers. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct adherence profiles. Higher adherence was associated with expertise in emergency and critical care medicine, affiliation with intensive care units or emergency departments, and a higher number of patients with sepsis managed monthly. These findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide survey identified characteristic clusters based on adherence to the J-SSCG2024 among Japanese clinicians. Targeted implementation strategies are essential to enhance guideline adoption, particularly among clinicians outside specialized critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482439/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145199748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-08DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00808-9
Johanna Weghorn, Melanie Finsterhölzl, Franziska Wippenbeck, Klaus Jahn, Marion Egger, Jeannine Bergmann
Background: Survivors of critical illness frequently face physical, cognitive and psychological impairments after intensive care. Sensorimotor impairments potentially have a negative impact on participation. However, comprehensive understanding of sensorimotor recovery and participation in survivors of critical illness is limited. Therefore, the aims of this study were to quantify long-term sensorimotor recovery in survivors of critical illness, to examine participation in daily life 1.5 years after illness onset, and to assess the predictive capacity of sensorimotor assessments for future participation.
Methods: Survivors of critical illness who were mechanically ventilated ≥ 5 days on the ICU and who were admitted with weakness to neurorehabilitation were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. Time effects on sensation, muscle strength, balance, walking and dexterity were described at admission to and at discharge from rehabilitation, and 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Participation was assessed with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. A multiple linear regression with sensorimotor outcomes at rehabilitation admission was conducted to find predictive associations with participation. The model was compared to an extended regression model containing demographic variables and factors known to be associated with participation or quality of life.
Results: All sensorimotor outcomes among participants (n = 250, median age 63 (54-73) years) improved over time. However, in most patients some deficits remained after rehabilitation and on long-term follow-up. Good participation (≥ 75%) was achieved by 60.2% of survivors 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Concerning participation, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) together with the Box-and-Block-Test, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand-Test, and the Medical Research Council score at rehabilitation admission formed a predictive model (R2 = 0.157, p < 0.001). The extended regression analysis resulted in a model (R2 = 0.357, p < 0.001) with the variables depression, duration of mechanical ventilation, cognitive function, Mini-BESTest, comorbidities, sex and cerebral lesion.
Conclusions: We observed significant improvements in sensorimotor function, albeit with lingering deficits in sensation, strength, balance, dexterity and participation. Sensorimotor functions at rehabilitation start have limited explanatory power in predicting participation 1.5 years after disease onset. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00021753. Date of registration: September 03, 2020.
{"title":"Long-term recovery of sensorimotor functions and prediction of participation in survivors of critical illness: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Johanna Weghorn, Melanie Finsterhölzl, Franziska Wippenbeck, Klaus Jahn, Marion Egger, Jeannine Bergmann","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00808-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00808-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of critical illness frequently face physical, cognitive and psychological impairments after intensive care. Sensorimotor impairments potentially have a negative impact on participation. However, comprehensive understanding of sensorimotor recovery and participation in survivors of critical illness is limited. Therefore, the aims of this study were to quantify long-term sensorimotor recovery in survivors of critical illness, to examine participation in daily life 1.5 years after illness onset, and to assess the predictive capacity of sensorimotor assessments for future participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survivors of critical illness who were mechanically ventilated ≥ 5 days on the ICU and who were admitted with weakness to neurorehabilitation were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. Time effects on sensation, muscle strength, balance, walking and dexterity were described at admission to and at discharge from rehabilitation, and 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Participation was assessed with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. A multiple linear regression with sensorimotor outcomes at rehabilitation admission was conducted to find predictive associations with participation. The model was compared to an extended regression model containing demographic variables and factors known to be associated with participation or quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All sensorimotor outcomes among participants (n = 250, median age 63 (54-73) years) improved over time. However, in most patients some deficits remained after rehabilitation and on long-term follow-up. Good participation (≥ 75%) was achieved by 60.2% of survivors 1.5 years after critical illness onset. Concerning participation, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) together with the Box-and-Block-Test, the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand-Test, and the Medical Research Council score at rehabilitation admission formed a predictive model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.157, p < 0.001). The extended regression analysis resulted in a model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.357, p < 0.001) with the variables depression, duration of mechanical ventilation, cognitive function, Mini-BESTest, comorbidities, sex and cerebral lesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed significant improvements in sensorimotor function, albeit with lingering deficits in sensation, strength, balance, dexterity and participation. Sensorimotor functions at rehabilitation start have limited explanatory power in predicting participation 1.5 years after disease onset. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00021753. Date of registration: September 03, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418612/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145029862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-02DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00820-z
Hazem Koozi, Jonas Engström, Anders Larsson, Martin Spångfors, Hans Friberg, Attila Frigyesi
Background: Endostatin is a promising biomarker for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated plasma endostatin levels at ICU admission as predictors of new-onset AKI within 48 h after ICU admission, renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 7 days after ICU admission, and 30-day mortality.
Methods: A retrospective multicentre study was performed with admissions to four ICUs. Blood samples were prospectively obtained at ICU admission and retrospectively analysed. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria defined AKI. Endostatin at ICU admission was compared to and adjusted for creatinine, cystatin C, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3). Regression models and mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) from repeated cross-validation were assessed.
Results: In total, 4732 admissions were included. Endostatin was associated with new-onset AKI (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 1.9), new-onset stage 3 AKI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 1.6), and RRT (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05 1.4) independently of creatinine, cystatin C, and SAPS-3. Endostatin was superior to creatinine and cystatin C in predicting new-onset AKI (mean AUC 0.67 vs. 0.63, p < 0.001). Adding endostatin to creatinine improved the prediction of new-onset AKI and new-onset stage 3 AKI, but not the need for RRT. Endostatin was not associated with 30-day mortality after adjusting for the SAPS-3 score.
Conclusions: Endostatin at ICU admission is an independent predictor of new-onset AKI and may improve early AKI risk assessment in the ICU. However, its predictive value for RRT and 30-day mortality appears limited. External validation and studies on its clinical utility are warranted.
背景:内皮抑素是预测重症监护病房(ICU)急性肾损伤(AKI)和死亡率的一种有前景的生物标志物。我们研究了ICU入院时血浆内皮抑素水平作为ICU入院后48小时内新发AKI、ICU入院后7天内肾脏替代治疗(RRT)和30天死亡率的预测因子。方法:对4例icu患者进行回顾性多中心研究。在ICU入院时前瞻性采集血样并进行回顾性分析。肾脏疾病:改善全球预后(KDIGO)标准定义AKI。比较ICU入院时的内皮抑素,并根据肌酐、胱抑素C和简化急性生理评分3 (SAPS-3)进行调整。评估反复交叉验证的回归模型和受试者工作特征曲线下的平均面积。结果:共纳入4732例患者。内皮抑素与新发AKI (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 - 1.9)、新发3期AKI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.6)和RRT (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.4)相关,与肌酐、胱抑素C和SAPS-3无关。内皮抑素在预测新发AKI方面优于肌酐和胱抑素C(平均AUC 0.67 vs 0.63, p)。结论:ICU入院时内皮抑素是新发AKI的独立预测因子,可改善ICU早期AKI风险评估。然而,其对RRT和30天死亡率的预测价值似乎有限。对其临床应用的外部验证和研究是必要的。
{"title":"Plasma endostatin and its association with new-onset acute kidney injury in critical care.","authors":"Hazem Koozi, Jonas Engström, Anders Larsson, Martin Spångfors, Hans Friberg, Attila Frigyesi","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00820-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00820-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endostatin is a promising biomarker for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated plasma endostatin levels at ICU admission as predictors of new-onset AKI within 48 h after ICU admission, renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 7 days after ICU admission, and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre study was performed with admissions to four ICUs. Blood samples were prospectively obtained at ICU admission and retrospectively analysed. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria defined AKI. Endostatin at ICU admission was compared to and adjusted for creatinine, cystatin C, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3). Regression models and mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) from repeated cross-validation were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4732 admissions were included. Endostatin was associated with new-onset AKI (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5 <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.9), new-onset stage 3 AKI (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.6), and RRT (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05 <math><mo>-</mo></math> 1.4) independently of creatinine, cystatin C, and SAPS-3. Endostatin was superior to creatinine and cystatin C in predicting new-onset AKI (mean AUC 0.67 vs. 0.63, p < 0.001). Adding endostatin to creatinine improved the prediction of new-onset AKI and new-onset stage 3 AKI, but not the need for RRT. Endostatin was not associated with 30-day mortality after adjusting for the SAPS-3 score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endostatin at ICU admission is an independent predictor of new-onset AKI and may improve early AKI risk assessment in the ICU. However, its predictive value for RRT and 30-day mortality appears limited. External validation and studies on its clinical utility are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403487/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-27DOI: 10.1186/s40560-025-00816-9
Andrew Li, Prashant Nasa, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Abdulrahman Al-Fares, Ming-Cheng Chan, Young-Jae Cho, Moritoki Egi, Mohammad Omar Faruq, Carine Harmouche, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian, Ayman Kharaba, Aidos Konkayev, Faisal Muchtar, Khalid Mahmood Khan Nafees, Mendsaikhan Naranpurev, Do Ngoc Son, Pauline Yeung Ng, Mohd Basri Mat-Nor, Jose Emmanuel Palo, Mehmet Uyar, Zhongheng Zhang, Jigeeshu Divatia, Jason Phua, Yaseen M Arabi, Lowell Ling
Background: Practice and delivery of critical care in Asia varies according to healthcare structure, income setting, and cultural factors. Identifying research priorities specific to ICU patients and healthcare workers in Asia is needed to guide advancement of critical care in the region.
Methods: This was an international cross-sectional survey study with adapted methods from nominal group techniques. All members of the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials (ACCCT) Group were invited to submit research question suggestions. Submitted research questions were combined into summarized research questions, grouped into research themes, and individually ranked by number of mentions based on the original question submission (popularity). National and Regional Representatives rated the top 15% most popular summarized research questions by pre-defined importance and feasibility criteria.
Results: Between September 20, 2024 and December 10, 2024, 160 of 228 general members of the ACCCT Group (response rate 70.2%) participated in this survey study. The participants were from 112 hospitals across 24 countries and regions within Asia. Participants submitted 408 research questions, which were categorized into 15 themes and combined into 197 summarized research questions. The top three themes, as ranked by the number of mentions, were infection/sepsis, general ICU care, and structure/training/staffing/teamwork/safety. A threshold of 4 mentions was used to identify 26 summarized research questions that represented the top 15% most popular questions. Research questions related to sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome were ranked most important and feasible across the region.
Conclusion: Twenty-six of the most popular research questions in critical care were identified by Asian ICU workers and researchers to drive research agenda in Asia for the next decade.
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical research priorities in Asian intensive care units (ERA-ICU).","authors":"Andrew Li, Prashant Nasa, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Abdulrahman Al-Fares, Ming-Cheng Chan, Young-Jae Cho, Moritoki Egi, Mohammad Omar Faruq, Carine Harmouche, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian, Ayman Kharaba, Aidos Konkayev, Faisal Muchtar, Khalid Mahmood Khan Nafees, Mendsaikhan Naranpurev, Do Ngoc Son, Pauline Yeung Ng, Mohd Basri Mat-Nor, Jose Emmanuel Palo, Mehmet Uyar, Zhongheng Zhang, Jigeeshu Divatia, Jason Phua, Yaseen M Arabi, Lowell Ling","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00816-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00816-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice and delivery of critical care in Asia varies according to healthcare structure, income setting, and cultural factors. Identifying research priorities specific to ICU patients and healthcare workers in Asia is needed to guide advancement of critical care in the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an international cross-sectional survey study with adapted methods from nominal group techniques. All members of the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials (ACCCT) Group were invited to submit research question suggestions. Submitted research questions were combined into summarized research questions, grouped into research themes, and individually ranked by number of mentions based on the original question submission (popularity). National and Regional Representatives rated the top 15% most popular summarized research questions by pre-defined importance and feasibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 20, 2024 and December 10, 2024, 160 of 228 general members of the ACCCT Group (response rate 70.2%) participated in this survey study. The participants were from 112 hospitals across 24 countries and regions within Asia. Participants submitted 408 research questions, which were categorized into 15 themes and combined into 197 summarized research questions. The top three themes, as ranked by the number of mentions, were infection/sepsis, general ICU care, and structure/training/staffing/teamwork/safety. A threshold of 4 mentions was used to identify 26 summarized research questions that represented the top 15% most popular questions. Research questions related to sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome were ranked most important and feasible across the region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twenty-six of the most popular research questions in critical care were identified by Asian ICU workers and researchers to drive research agenda in Asia for the next decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144957192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Since the concept of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) was proposed, numerous studies have assessed patients and their family members. However, a wide range of assessment timings has been employed across previous studies. This study aimed to clarify how assessment timings have been implemented in existing PICS research through a scoping review, and to explore expert opinions on optimal assessment timing via an online survey.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review of studies assessing PICS-related outcomes, including physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments, as well as PICS in family members. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL, and screened by two independent pairs of reviewers. Eligible studies were published between January 2014 and December 2022. Studies lacking a clear description of assessment timing were excluded. We analyzed the reference point used to determine assessment schedules, the assessment time points, and their frequency. Additionally, an online questionnaire was administered to 23 members of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine PICS committee and working group members to collect expert opinions on these three aspects for clinical research.
Results: A total of 657 studies were included. In prior studies, hospital discharge was the most commonly used reference point for determining assessment schedule (240 studies, 40%). However, ICU discharge was identified by experts as the ideal reference point (16 votes, 47%). The most frequently used assessment time points were 3 months (262, 23%), 6 months (212, 19%), and 12 months (206, 18%) post-discharge. Experts most commonly selected the period between 6 and 12 months as the optimal time point for assessment. While single assessments were most common in previous studies (337, 51%), experts considered three assessments to be ideal (12, 44%).
Conclusions: This study revealed notable discrepancies between the assessment timing reported in previous studies and the opinions of experts regarding optimal timing. Standardization of assessment timing in PICS research is warranted to enhance methodological consistency and comparability.
{"title":"Optimal timing for assessing post-intensive care syndrome in clinical research: a scoping review and expert survey.","authors":"Kohei Tanaka, Nobuto Nakanishi, Keibun Liu, Kyohei Miyamoto, Akira Kawauchi, Masatsugu Okamura, Sho Katayama, Yuki Iida, Yusuke Kawai, Junji Hatakeyama, Toru Hifumi, Takeshi Unoki, Daisuke Kawakami, Fumimasa Amaya, Kengo Obata, Hidenori Sumita, Tomoyuki Morisawa, Norihiko Tsuboi, Ryo Kozu, Shunsuke Takaki, Junpei Haruna, Kohei Ota, Yoshihisa Fujinami, Nobuyuki Nosaka, Kasumi Shirasaki, Shigeaki Inoue, Osamu Nishida, Kensuke Nakamura","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00817-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00817-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the concept of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) was proposed, numerous studies have assessed patients and their family members. However, a wide range of assessment timings has been employed across previous studies. This study aimed to clarify how assessment timings have been implemented in existing PICS research through a scoping review, and to explore expert opinions on optimal assessment timing via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of studies assessing PICS-related outcomes, including physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments, as well as PICS in family members. Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL, and screened by two independent pairs of reviewers. Eligible studies were published between January 2014 and December 2022. Studies lacking a clear description of assessment timing were excluded. We analyzed the reference point used to determine assessment schedules, the assessment time points, and their frequency. Additionally, an online questionnaire was administered to 23 members of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine PICS committee and working group members to collect expert opinions on these three aspects for clinical research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 657 studies were included. In prior studies, hospital discharge was the most commonly used reference point for determining assessment schedule (240 studies, 40%). However, ICU discharge was identified by experts as the ideal reference point (16 votes, 47%). The most frequently used assessment time points were 3 months (262, 23%), 6 months (212, 19%), and 12 months (206, 18%) post-discharge. Experts most commonly selected the period between 6 and 12 months as the optimal time point for assessment. While single assessments were most common in previous studies (337, 51%), experts considered three assessments to be ideal (12, 44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed notable discrepancies between the assessment timing reported in previous studies and the opinions of experts regarding optimal timing. Standardization of assessment timing in PICS research is warranted to enhance methodological consistency and comparability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This study investigated the application of software-based data monitoring for quality control (QC) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) management.
Methods: This single-center pre-post intervention study, conducted in three ICUs of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, compared outcomes before (Jan-Dec 2023) and after (Jan-Dec 2024) implementing the Sharesource Connect system. Data from 9 Prismaflex CRRT machines were collected retrospectively during 2023 and prospectively on a monthly basis during 2024. Alongside the software, a comprehensive quality improvement program: (1) multidisciplinary team collaboration; (2) data-driven QC; and (3) structured training. Primary outcomes-filter lifespan, downtime percentage, delivered/prescribed dose ratio, ultrafiltration volume, and vascular access alarms-were compared.
Results: A total of 798 filters from 514 patients (2023) and 717 filters from 492 patients (2024) were analyzed. Key quality metrics improved significantly following implementation (2024 vs. 2023): Filter lifespan increased significantly from 20.08 ± 4.12 h to 24.08 ± 4.27 h (P = 0.043), Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved filter survival (Log-Rank p < 0.001). Cumulative survival increased from 2023 to 2024 at key time points: 12 h (69.1%-87.2%, + 18.1%), 24 h (30.9%-34.6%, + 3.7%), and 36 h (5.6%-13.6%, + 8.0%), with consistent improvements observed. Downtime percentage decreased from 39 to 28% (P = 0.015), reducing non-effective treatment time by 11 percentage points. The delivered/prescribed dose ratio increased from 82 to 86% (P = 0.046). The mean delivered dose was 35.67 ± 4.01 mL/kg/h (prescribed: 41.33 ± 4.5 mL/kg/h). Ultrafiltration volume remained stable (3.13 ± 0.37 vs. 3.52 ± 0.44 L/treatment day, P = 0.058). There was no significant difference in vascular access alarms (3.39 ± 1.44 vs. 2.93 ± 0.73 events/day, P = 0.392).
Conclusion: The Sharesource Connect system could be used for the monitoring, collection, and analysis of CRRT data to assist in the QC management related to CRRT, so as to provide a software basis for further multi-center studies or random control trials on the intelligent management of critical patients undergoing CRRT.
{"title":"Preliminary application of the Sharesource connect data collection and analysis system in the management of continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Wensan Wu, Jianli Wang, Chen Chen, Junqi Feng, Shuyi Zhang, An Shi, Jing Zhang, Xinyi He, Jiangchen Peng, Mingli Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00818-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40560-025-00818-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the application of software-based data monitoring for quality control (QC) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center pre-post intervention study, conducted in three ICUs of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, compared outcomes before (Jan-Dec 2023) and after (Jan-Dec 2024) implementing the Sharesource Connect system. Data from 9 Prismaflex CRRT machines were collected retrospectively during 2023 and prospectively on a monthly basis during 2024. Alongside the software, a comprehensive quality improvement program: (1) multidisciplinary team collaboration; (2) data-driven QC; and (3) structured training. Primary outcomes-filter lifespan, downtime percentage, delivered/prescribed dose ratio, ultrafiltration volume, and vascular access alarms-were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 798 filters from 514 patients (2023) and 717 filters from 492 patients (2024) were analyzed. Key quality metrics improved significantly following implementation (2024 vs. 2023): Filter lifespan increased significantly from 20.08 ± 4.12 h to 24.08 ± 4.27 h (P = 0.043), Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved filter survival (Log-Rank p < 0.001). Cumulative survival increased from 2023 to 2024 at key time points: 12 h (69.1%-87.2%, + 18.1%), 24 h (30.9%-34.6%, + 3.7%), and 36 h (5.6%-13.6%, + 8.0%), with consistent improvements observed. Downtime percentage decreased from 39 to 28% (P = 0.015), reducing non-effective treatment time by 11 percentage points. The delivered/prescribed dose ratio increased from 82 to 86% (P = 0.046). The mean delivered dose was 35.67 ± 4.01 mL/kg/h (prescribed: 41.33 ± 4.5 mL/kg/h). Ultrafiltration volume remained stable (3.13 ± 0.37 vs. 3.52 ± 0.44 L/treatment day, P = 0.058). There was no significant difference in vascular access alarms (3.39 ± 1.44 vs. 2.93 ± 0.73 events/day, P = 0.392).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Sharesource Connect system could be used for the monitoring, collection, and analysis of CRRT data to assist in the QC management related to CRRT, so as to provide a software basis for further multi-center studies or random control trials on the intelligent management of critical patients undergoing CRRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144873565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}