Journal of Korean Medical Science最新文献

Background: Despite their effectiveness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been associated with adverse effects, underscoring the importance of continuous surveillance to ensure vaccine safety and effective management of public health. Herein, the characteristics and risk factors of vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) were identified to gain an in-depth understanding of vaccine safety by investigating the impact of the vaccination dose on changes in post-vaccination AEs.

Methods: Herein, a linked database of COVID-19 vaccination records from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, AE reports from the COVID-19 Vaccination Management System, and healthcare claims from the National Health Insurance Service, targeting ≥ 5-year-old individuals, was utilized (study duration = February 26, 2021, to January 31, 2023). The frequency and severity of reported post-vaccination AEs were evaluated. Furthermore, we specifically explored AEs in relation to the cumulative dosage of vaccines administered while evaluating associated risk factors.

Results: During the observation period, 42,804,523 individuals completed the COVID-19 vaccination series, with 365,900 reporting AEs, with headache, muscle pain, and fever being the most frequently reported. Notably, the AE reports were approximately twice as high for women than for men, which was further exacerbated following both doses. Analysis by age group revealed that AE reports were lower among children, adolescents, and older adults than in the middle-aged cohort (age = 50-64 years), with higher reports observed for 18-49-year-old individuals. Additionally, a higher risk of reporting was identified among individuals with lower socioeconomic status compared with those of middle socioeconomic status. Excluding dementia, the risk of reporting AEs was high in individuals with underlying diseases compared with those without, for instance, the risk of reporting AEs following two-dose vaccinations was approximately twice as high in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that women, younger people, those with a lower socioeconomic status, and those with underlying health conditions reported a higher incidence of AEs following COVID-19 vaccinations. This emphasizes the need for continued monitoring to ensure safe vaccination and address vaccine-related anxiety and fear, especially within the aforementioned groups.

Background: To assess the effectiveness of rescue cerclage concerning pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with acute cervical insufficiency (CI) complicated with intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI) compared with those managed expectantly.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 87 consecutive singleton pregnant women (17-25 weeks) with acute CI who underwent amniocentesis to assess IAI. Amniotic fluid (AF) samples were assayed for interleukin-6 to define IAI (≥ 2.6 ng/mL). Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in a subset of CI patients with IAI. The primary outcome measures were spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) at < 28 and < 34 weeks, and the secondary outcomes were interval from sampling to delivery, neonatal survival, neonatal birth weight, and histologic and clinical chorioamnionitis. Macrolide antibiotics were prescribed depending on the type of microorganism isolated from the AF, clinically suspected IAI, and the discretion of the attending clinician.

Results: IAI was identified in 65.5% (57/87) of patients with CI, of whom 73.6% (42/57) were treated with macrolide antibiotics. Among the CI patients with IAI (n = 57), 40 underwent rescue cerclage and 17 were expectantly managed. The rates of SPTBs at < 28 and < 34 weeks were significantly lower and the latency period was significantly longer in the cerclage group than in the group that was managed expectantly. The median birth weight and neonatal survival rate were significantly higher in the cerclage group than in the group that was managed expectantly. However, the rates of histologic and clinical chorioamnionitis did not differ between the groups. Multivariable analyses revealed that rescue cerclage placement and administration of macrolide antibiotics were significantly associated with a decrease in SPTBs at < 28 and < 34 weeks, prolonged gestational latency, and increased likelihood of neonatal survival, after adjusting for possible confounding parameters; however, macrolide antibiotic administration did not reach statistical significance with respect to SPTB at < 34 weeks and neonatal survival (P = 0.076 and 0.063, respectively).

Conclusion: Rescue cerclage along with macrolide antibiotic treatment may positively impact pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with CI complicated by IAI, compared with expectant management. These findings suggest the benefit of cerclage placement even in patients with CI complicated by IAI.

Background: A rapid decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is considered an important phenotype of the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the associations between specific genetic variants (single-nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs) and this phenotype remain uncertain.

Methods: We enrolled 6,516 individuals from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). A rapid decline in FEV1 was defined as an annual decrease of FEV1 ≥ 60 mL/year. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between SNP variants and the rapid decline in FEV1. Considering the significant impact of smoking on lung function, a subgroup analysis based on smoking history was also conducted.

Results: A genome-wide association analysis of the rapid decline in FEV1 identified 15 association signals (P < 5.0 × 10^-8). Among the 15 nucleotide variants, rs9833533 and rs1496255 have been previously reported to be associated with lung function development. In the subgroup analysis, rs16951883 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.24; P = 5.87 × 10^-8) was the most significant SNP associated with rapid decline in FEV1 among never smokers, followed by rs41476549, rs16840064, and rs1350110. Conversely, among ever smokers, rs10959478 (aOR, 4.74; P = 8.27 × 10^-7) showed the highest significance, followed by rs6805861, rs9833533, and rs16906215.

Conclusion: We identified 15 nucleotide variants linked to a rapid decline in FEV1, including two SNPs previously reported to be associated with lung function development. Additional SNPs, which were associated with COPD, may be found using novel phenotypes.

Public health and clinical medicine should identify and characterize modifiable risk factors for skin cancer in order to facilitate primary prevention. In existing literature, the impact of occupational exposure on skin cancer, including malignant melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, has been extensively studied. This review summarizes the available epidemiological evidence on the significance of occupational risk factors and occupations associated with a higher risk in skin cancer. The results of this review suggest that there is sufficient epidemiological evidence to support the relationship between the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancers and occupational exposure to solar radiation, ultraviolet radiation, ionizing radiation, arsenic and its compounds, and mineral oils. Occupational exposure to pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls appears to provide sufficient epidemiological evidence for melanoma, and a higher risk of melanoma has been reported among workers in petroleum refining and firefighters. This comprehensive analysis will establish a foundation for subsequent investigations and developing targeted interventions of focused preventive measures against skin cancer among the working population.

Background: The association between preoperative opioid or glucocorticoid (GC) use and clinical outcomes, such as postoperative mortality after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), is unclear.

Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. Patients who underwent TJA (total knee or total hip arthroplasty) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were included. We examined whether the patients had been prescribed opioids or oral GC for > 90 days prior to TJA.

Results: In total, 664,598 patients who underwent TJA were included, among whom 245,260 (52.4%), 23,076 (3.5%), and 47,777 (7.2%) were classified into the opioid, GC, and opioid and GC groups, respectively. Compared to the non-user group, the opioid and GC user groups showed 53% (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.30; P = 0.010) higher odds of in-hospital mortality. Compared to non-users, GC users (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.34; P < 0.001) and opioid and GC users (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.35; P < 0.001) showed a higher risk of 1-year all-cause mortality. Compared to the non-user group, GC users (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15; P < 0.001) and opioid and GC users (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; P = 0.014) showed higher odds of postoperative complications.

Conclusion: Preoperative GC use and concomitant use of opioid analgesics with GC were associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity after TJA. However, preoperative chronic opioid analgesic use alone did not affect postoperative mortality or morbidity.

Background: The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method is a widely used tool for assessing patient severity and predicting survival probability in trauma care. However, its accuracy and applicability in the Korean context, particularly for neurotrauma patients, have not been thoroughly validated yet. Previous studies at a single institution have identified significant discrepancies between TRISS predictions and actual outcomes, particularly in severe neurotrauma cases. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the TRISS method on a national scale using data from multiple regional trauma centers (RTCs) in Korea.

Methods: We utilized data from the Korea Trauma Data Bank collected from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021. A total of 70,785 patients were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The probability of survival was calculated using the TRISS method. Patients were categorized into neurotrauma and non-neurotrauma groups. Misclassification rate (MR) was measured by comparing the predicted survival or death using the TRISS method with the actual outcomes to assess the predictive validity of the TRISS method.

Results: This study included 28,285 neurotrauma patients and 42,503 non-neurotrauma patients. The neurotrauma group had higher actual deaths (2,401) than the non-neurotrauma group (809). The neurotrauma group also had a significantly higher mortality rate per 100,000 population (8,489.50 vs. 1,903.40). MR was significantly higher in neurotrauma patients (8.07%) than in non-neurotrauma patients (1.92%). Patients with severe head injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) had the highest MR (32.27%).

Conclusion: Our study confirms that the TRISS method's misclassification issues observed at a single institution are prevalent across multiple RTCs in Korea. The accuracy of the TRISS method decreases with increasing injury severity, particularly in neurotrauma patients. These findings highlight the need to revise evaluation criteria and develop more accurate prediction models tailored to the Korean trauma care system. Implementing these changes will enhance the reliability of trauma care assessments and ensure more equitable support for RTCs, ultimately improving the quality and equity of trauma care in Korea.

Background: There is a dearth of research on the factors linked with adverse events (AEs) associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMVr) and molnupiravir (MOL), particularly in the elderly. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate self-reported AEs and identify factors associated with the occurrence of AEs following NMVr or MOL treatment among survey participants aged 60 years or older in South Korea.

Methods: This nationwide survey was conducted through in-person interviews using structured questionnaires, from July 24 to August 31, 2023. Eligible participants included individuals aged 60 years or older who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and received NMVr or MOL. The study outcomes included self-reported demographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics associated with the occurrence of AEs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each characteristic in participants with and without AEs.

Results: Of the 520 participants, 123 (23.7%) experienced at least one AE with oral COVID-19 treatment: 21.0% (96/458) for NMVr and 43.5% (27/62) for MOL. None of the participants reported any serious AEs. Increased odds of AE occurrence were observed in participants treated with MOL compared to those treated with NMVr (aOR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.67-5.57), a history of two or more compared to one COVID-19 diagnosis (1.93; 1.03-3.62), and self-reported health status as "Unhealthy" compared to "Healthy" (2.65; 1.31-5.36).

Conclusion: No AEs required further evaluation to change treatment strategies in elderly patients on NMVr or MOL. Several factors, including the use of MOL, history of COVID-19, and reported health status, were associated with an increased incidence of AEs. Both treatments may still be useful choices for patients with non-severe COVID-19 aged 60 years or older. However, close monitoring of unidentified potential harm and further investigation of the factors associated with the occurrence of AEs are needed.