Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.3171/2025.8.JNS252040
Chengyuan Wu
{"title":"Editorial. Introducing the VPS Reporting Guideline as a framework to improve evidence in hydrocephalus care.","authors":"Chengyuan Wu","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS252040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.JNS252040","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.3171/2025.12.JNS251301a
Gillian Shasby
{"title":"Erratum. Surgical site infection after cranioplasty for brain tumor: insights from a 15-year Swedish multicenter cohort.","authors":"Gillian Shasby","doi":"10.3171/2025.12.JNS251301a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.12.JNS251301a","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.3171/2025.8.JNS251350
Samuel A Tenhoeve, Julian Brown, Matthew C Findlay, Saachi Jhandi, Janet Cortez, Ramesh Grandhi, Sarah Lombardo, Toby Enniss, Sarah T Menacho
Objective: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) provide neurosurgical consultation and imaging protocols by stratifying patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) according to injury severity. However, the effect of concomitant blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) on clinical progression and surgical intervention within this framework has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Biffl grade for BCVI evaluation should be incorporated into the BIG criteria to help determine clinical care, follow-up imaging, and treatment decisions for these patients.
Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with TBI who were transferred to a level 1 trauma center from 2019 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. For analysis, patients were stratified by BIG category and propensity matched (1:1) by age, sex, BIG classification, and frailty index. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without BCVI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of clinical progression (radiographic injury progression or clinical neurological deterioration) or the need for neurosurgical intervention, both in the overall cohort and in the BCVI subgroup.
Results: Overall, 999 patients (648 male, mean age 53.5 years) were included in this analysis, and 103 patients (10.3%) presented with BCVI in addition to TBI. The presence of BCVI was not independently associated with progression or the need for neurosurgical intervention in the overall cohort of patients with TBI or the matched cohort (103 patients with BCVI and 103 patients without BCVI). However, among patients with BCVI, both the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.01-9.37) and an injury classified as Biffl grade > I (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.46-10.96) significantly predicted progression or the need for intervention.
Conclusions: For patients with TBI, BCVI alone did not predict clinical progression or the need for neurosurgical intervention. However, higher Biffl grades and intracranial hemorrhage among patients with BCVI were associated with a greater risk of clinical progression or the need for neurosurgical intervention. These findings support the integration of BCVI-specific factors into triage models and highlight the need for refined clinical pathways that supplement BIG classification when BCVI is present.
目的:脑损伤指南(BIG)通过对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者根据损伤严重程度进行分层,提供神经外科会诊和影像学方案。然而,在此框架下,合并钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)对临床进展和手术干预的影响尚未研究。本研究的目的是确定BCVI评估的Biffl分级是否应纳入BIG标准,以帮助确定这些患者的临床护理、随访成像和治疗决策。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2023年转入一级创伤中心的成年TBI患者(年龄≥18岁)。为了进行分析,患者按BIG分类分层,并按年龄、性别、BIG分类和虚弱指数进行倾向匹配(1:1)。比较BCVI患者和非BCVI患者的临床结果。在整个队列和BCVI亚组中,进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定临床进展(影像学损伤进展或临床神经系统恶化)或需要神经外科干预的预测因素。结果:总体而言,999例患者(648例男性,平均年龄53.5岁)被纳入该分析,103例患者(10.3%)在TBI之外出现BCVI。在整个TBI患者队列或匹配队列(103例BCVI患者和103例无BCVI患者)中,BCVI的存在与进展或需要神经外科干预没有独立关联。然而,在BCVI患者中,颅内出血的存在(OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.01-9.37)和Biffl分级> I级的损伤(OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.46-10.96)均可显著预测病情进展或需要干预。结论:对于TBI患者,单独BCVI不能预测临床进展或需要神经外科干预。然而,BCVI患者较高的Biffl分级和颅内出血与更高的临床进展风险或需要神经外科干预相关。这些发现支持将BCVI特异性因素整合到分诊模型中,并强调了当BCVI存在时,需要完善的临床途径来补充BIG分类。
{"title":"Clinical progression in patients with concomitant blunt cerebrovascular injury and traumatic brain injury classified using the Brain Injury Guidelines.","authors":"Samuel A Tenhoeve, Julian Brown, Matthew C Findlay, Saachi Jhandi, Janet Cortez, Ramesh Grandhi, Sarah Lombardo, Toby Enniss, Sarah T Menacho","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS251350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.JNS251350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) provide neurosurgical consultation and imaging protocols by stratifying patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) according to injury severity. However, the effect of concomitant blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) on clinical progression and surgical intervention within this framework has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Biffl grade for BCVI evaluation should be incorporated into the BIG criteria to help determine clinical care, follow-up imaging, and treatment decisions for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with TBI who were transferred to a level 1 trauma center from 2019 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. For analysis, patients were stratified by BIG category and propensity matched (1:1) by age, sex, BIG classification, and frailty index. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without BCVI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of clinical progression (radiographic injury progression or clinical neurological deterioration) or the need for neurosurgical intervention, both in the overall cohort and in the BCVI subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 999 patients (648 male, mean age 53.5 years) were included in this analysis, and 103 patients (10.3%) presented with BCVI in addition to TBI. The presence of BCVI was not independently associated with progression or the need for neurosurgical intervention in the overall cohort of patients with TBI or the matched cohort (103 patients with BCVI and 103 patients without BCVI). However, among patients with BCVI, both the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.01-9.37) and an injury classified as Biffl grade > I (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.46-10.96) significantly predicted progression or the need for intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with TBI, BCVI alone did not predict clinical progression or the need for neurosurgical intervention. However, higher Biffl grades and intracranial hemorrhage among patients with BCVI were associated with a greater risk of clinical progression or the need for neurosurgical intervention. These findings support the integration of BCVI-specific factors into triage models and highlight the need for refined clinical pathways that supplement BIG classification when BCVI is present.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.3171/2025.8.JNS251448
Leonardo J C Cardoso, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Lucas P Mitre, Leonardo B O Brenner, Anthony E Bishay, Silvio Porto Junior, Gabriel S Barbosa, João Paulo Liute Scamarral, Gabriel Semione, Luis Fabrini Paleare, Túlio F S Leite, Raphael Bertani, Christian Ferreira, David Langer, Netanel Ben-Shalom
Objective: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement remains the primary treatment for hydrocephalus. However, the literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with studies assessing and reporting surgical and clinical outcomes in different ways, lacking standardization. The authors aimed to evaluate the quality of these studies and propose a reporting guideline focusing on essential elements to ensure reproducibility and comparability.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies were observational or randomized, reported clinical and/or surgical outcomes related to the treatment of hydrocephalus with VPS placement, included more than 200 patients, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2024. Studies were assessed and focused on 6 key domains: 1) baseline characteristics of the patient sample; 2) study methodology and reporting guidelines; 3) patient comorbidities and clinical status; 4) valve and shunt characteristics; 5) shunt failure, revision, and infection; and 6) postsurgical outcomes and complications.
Results: Forty-five studies comprising 95,597 patients were included. The authors' assessment revealed substantial gaps in the literature on VPS placement, including deficiencies across all domains. A VPS reporting guideline was developed, consisting of 50 items distributed across 6 domains, focusing on key surgical and clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: This review identified important gaps in methodological rigor and reporting across VPS studies for hydrocephalus, limiting the comparability and reproducibility of current evidence. To address these issues, the authors propose the VPS Reporting Guideline, a practical framework to enhance transparency, reproducibility, and comparability in future research, ultimately supporting better evidence synthesis and building of cumulative evidence.
目的:脑室-腹膜分流术(VPS)的放置仍然是脑积水的主要治疗方法。然而,关于这一主题的文献是异质的,研究以不同的方式评估和报告手术和临床结果,缺乏标准化。作者旨在评估这些研究的质量,并提出一项报告指南,重点关注基本要素,以确保可重复性和可比性。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,作者系统地检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库。符合条件的研究是观察性或随机的,报告了与放置VPS治疗脑积水相关的临床和/或手术结果,包括200多名患者,并在2000年1月1日至2024年6月1日期间以英文发表。研究被评估并集中在6个关键领域:1)患者样本的基线特征;2)研究方法和报告准则;3)患者合并症及临床状况;4)阀门及分流特性;5)分流失败、翻修和感染;6)术后结果和并发症。结果:纳入45项研究,共95,597例患者。作者的评估揭示了VPS安置文献的巨大差距,包括所有领域的缺陷。制定了VPS报告指南,包括分布在6个领域的50个项目,重点关注关键的手术和临床结果。结论:本综述确定了脑积水VPS研究在方法学严谨性和报告方面的重要差距,限制了现有证据的可比性和可重复性。为了解决这些问题,作者提出了VPS报告指南,这是一个实用的框架,可提高未来研究的透明度、可重复性和可比性,最终支持更好的证据合成和累积证据的建立。
{"title":"Enhancing reporting standards and cumulative evidence in ventriculoperitoneal shunt studies: a systematic review and reporting guideline proposal.","authors":"Leonardo J C Cardoso, Marcio Yuri Ferreira, Lucas P Mitre, Leonardo B O Brenner, Anthony E Bishay, Silvio Porto Junior, Gabriel S Barbosa, João Paulo Liute Scamarral, Gabriel Semione, Luis Fabrini Paleare, Túlio F S Leite, Raphael Bertani, Christian Ferreira, David Langer, Netanel Ben-Shalom","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS251448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.JNS251448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement remains the primary treatment for hydrocephalus. However, the literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with studies assessing and reporting surgical and clinical outcomes in different ways, lacking standardization. The authors aimed to evaluate the quality of these studies and propose a reporting guideline focusing on essential elements to ensure reproducibility and comparability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Eligible studies were observational or randomized, reported clinical and/or surgical outcomes related to the treatment of hydrocephalus with VPS placement, included more than 200 patients, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2024. Studies were assessed and focused on 6 key domains: 1) baseline characteristics of the patient sample; 2) study methodology and reporting guidelines; 3) patient comorbidities and clinical status; 4) valve and shunt characteristics; 5) shunt failure, revision, and infection; and 6) postsurgical outcomes and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five studies comprising 95,597 patients were included. The authors' assessment revealed substantial gaps in the literature on VPS placement, including deficiencies across all domains. A VPS reporting guideline was developed, consisting of 50 items distributed across 6 domains, focusing on key surgical and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified important gaps in methodological rigor and reporting across VPS studies for hydrocephalus, limiting the comparability and reproducibility of current evidence. To address these issues, the authors propose the VPS Reporting Guideline, a practical framework to enhance transparency, reproducibility, and comparability in future research, ultimately supporting better evidence synthesis and building of cumulative evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Nerve injuries can have devastating effects on patients' quality of life. However, the clinical results of direct nerve repair, which is commonly performed for peripheral nerve injury, are often unsatisfactory because of undesirable tension at the repair site. Previous studies have suggested that using a nerve conduit as a connector could provide outcomes that are equivalent to, or potentially better than, direct suture repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanisms of peripheral nerve regeneration through a short gap encapsulated in a conduit using transgenic mice.
Methods: Sixty-four transgenic mice (Thy1 yellow fluorescent protein [YFP]-16), in which all axon fibers of the motor and sensory nerves constitutively express YFP, were used in this study. The sciatic nerve of each mouse underwent transection to artificially create an injury. Two weeks later, two types of repair operations were performed: 1) direct epineurial suture (direct repair [DR] group); and 2) repair using an artificial nerve (a polyglycolic acid conduit) as a nerve connector (connector repair [CR] group). Recovery was monitored by serial in vivo imaging of axonal growth and was assessed through histomorphometric measurements such as the axon number, myelinated fiber diameter, myelin sheath thickness, and g-ratio. Functional recovery was evaluated by calculating the area of anterior tibialis muscle fibers and using the von Frey filament test. Gene expression at the repair site was also analyzed.
Results: Although regeneration was slower in the CR than the DR group, the muscle area at week 6 was significantly higher in the CR group, indicating better motor recovery. Moreover, sensory recovery was similar between the CR and DR groups at the final 12-week examination.
Conclusions: These findings indicate that repair using an artificial nerve as a connector achieved better, albeit slow, functional recovery than repair using a direct epineural suture.
{"title":"Peripheral nerve injury repair using a nerve connector as an alternative to direct repair.","authors":"Satoshi Otani, Satoshi Ichihara, Masao Suzuki, Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Sayaka Ishii, Nana Ito, Wataru Kihara, Akira Hara, Ayato Hayashi, Katsuhiko Maezawa, Muneaki Ishijima","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS243203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.JNS243203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nerve injuries can have devastating effects on patients' quality of life. However, the clinical results of direct nerve repair, which is commonly performed for peripheral nerve injury, are often unsatisfactory because of undesirable tension at the repair site. Previous studies have suggested that using a nerve conduit as a connector could provide outcomes that are equivalent to, or potentially better than, direct suture repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanisms of peripheral nerve regeneration through a short gap encapsulated in a conduit using transgenic mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-four transgenic mice (Thy1 yellow fluorescent protein [YFP]-16), in which all axon fibers of the motor and sensory nerves constitutively express YFP, were used in this study. The sciatic nerve of each mouse underwent transection to artificially create an injury. Two weeks later, two types of repair operations were performed: 1) direct epineurial suture (direct repair [DR] group); and 2) repair using an artificial nerve (a polyglycolic acid conduit) as a nerve connector (connector repair [CR] group). Recovery was monitored by serial in vivo imaging of axonal growth and was assessed through histomorphometric measurements such as the axon number, myelinated fiber diameter, myelin sheath thickness, and g-ratio. Functional recovery was evaluated by calculating the area of anterior tibialis muscle fibers and using the von Frey filament test. Gene expression at the repair site was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although regeneration was slower in the CR than the DR group, the muscle area at week 6 was significantly higher in the CR group, indicating better motor recovery. Moreover, sensory recovery was similar between the CR and DR groups at the final 12-week examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that repair using an artificial nerve as a connector achieved better, albeit slow, functional recovery than repair using a direct epineural suture.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ali Gharibi Loron, William D Chow, Andrew D Pumford, Conan Y Zhao, Michael B Keough, Hyo Bin You, Bobby Do, Jenna R Schwartz, Robert L Foote, Anita Mahajan, David M Routman, Kathy J Stien, Michael J Link, Terry C Burns, Elizabeth Yan, Paul D Brown, Bruce E Pollock, Ian F Parney
Objective: Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond 3 months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluated prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection.
Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at their institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived less than 90 days after SRS were identified and case matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. The authors modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) < 70 (OR 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole-brain radiation (OR 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of poor survival, whereas CNS progression before SRS (OR 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with survival < 90 days. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%.
Conclusions: Key predictors of 90-day survival after SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurological deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.
目的:脑转移瘤显著影响神经认知功能和总体生存。立体定向放射手术(SRS)是有限转移和预期生存期超过3个月的患者治疗的基石。尽管有目前的指导方针,但据报道,接受SRS的脑转移患者中有高达20%在90天内死亡。本研究回顾性评估与SRS术后90天生存率相关的预后因素,旨在改善患者选择。方法:作者回顾性分析了2015年至2023年间在其机构接受伽玛刀SRS治疗脑转移的1546例患者。170名患者在SRS后存活不到90天,与170名存活超过90天的患者相匹配。测量变量包括患者人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、治疗史、功能状态和原发癌症的控制情况。作者使用二项和多变量逻辑回归模拟srs后90天的生存。结果:多因素分析强调Karnofsky性能评分(KPS) < 70 (OR 17.4, p < 0.001)、既往全脑辐射(OR 6, p = 0.004)和局灶性神经功能缺损(OR 3.02, p = 0.003)是不良生存的重要预测因素,而SRS前CNS进展(OR 0.22, p < 0.001)和系统性癌症控制(OR 0.556, p = 0.002)与生存< 90天相关。该预测模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.85,准确度为80%,灵敏度为87%,特异性为71%。结论:脑转移患者SRS后90天生存率的关键预测因素包括功能状态(KPS)、系统性癌症控制、中枢神经系统进展状态和局灶性神经功能缺陷。这些发现是辅助决策和SRS患者选择的补充因素。
{"title":"Prognostic factors for 90-day survival after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis patients.","authors":"Ali Gharibi Loron, William D Chow, Andrew D Pumford, Conan Y Zhao, Michael B Keough, Hyo Bin You, Bobby Do, Jenna R Schwartz, Robert L Foote, Anita Mahajan, David M Routman, Kathy J Stien, Michael J Link, Terry C Burns, Elizabeth Yan, Paul D Brown, Bruce E Pollock, Ian F Parney","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS25859","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.JNS25859","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond 3 months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluated prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at their institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived less than 90 days after SRS were identified and case matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. The authors modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) < 70 (OR 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole-brain radiation (OR 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of poor survival, whereas CNS progression before SRS (OR 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with survival < 90 days. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key predictors of 90-day survival after SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurological deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.3171/2025.8.JNS251142
Thomas J Wilson, Zarina S Ali, Gavin A Davis, Nora F Dengler, Ketan Desai, Debora Garozzo, Fernando Guedes, Christian P G Heinen, Jennifer Hong, Line G Jacques, Ekkapot Jitpun, Thomas Kretschmer, Mark A Mahan, Rajiv Midha, Willem Pondaag, Ross C Puffer, Lukas Rasulic, Wilson Z Ray, Elias Rizk, Carlos A Rodriguez-Aceves, Yamaan S Saadeh, Yuval Shapira, Mariano Socolovsky, Robert J Spinner, Eric L Zager
Objective: Core outcome sets (COSs) are needed to promote data consistency across studies as well as data synthesis and comparability. The aim of the current study was to use a modified Delphi process to develop a COS for lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy (LFCN), hereafter COS-LFCN.
Methods: A 5-stage approach was used to develop the COS-LFCN: 1) consortium development, 2) literature review to identify potential outcome measures, 3) Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion, 4) Delphi survey to develop definitions, and 5) consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. This study followed the Core Outcome Set - STAndards for Development, (COS-STAD) recommendations.
Results: The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 25 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 14 countries. The final COS-LFCN consisted of 41 factors and outcomes covering domains of demographics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor/sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months, with the consensus optimal time points for assessment being preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
Conclusions: The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS for LFCN and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-LFCN should serve as the minimum data to be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on LFCN. Incorporation of this COS will help improve consistency in reporting, data synthesis and comparability, and minimize outcome reporting bias.
{"title":"Core outcomes in nerve surgery: development of a core outcome set for lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy.","authors":"Thomas J Wilson, Zarina S Ali, Gavin A Davis, Nora F Dengler, Ketan Desai, Debora Garozzo, Fernando Guedes, Christian P G Heinen, Jennifer Hong, Line G Jacques, Ekkapot Jitpun, Thomas Kretschmer, Mark A Mahan, Rajiv Midha, Willem Pondaag, Ross C Puffer, Lukas Rasulic, Wilson Z Ray, Elias Rizk, Carlos A Rodriguez-Aceves, Yamaan S Saadeh, Yuval Shapira, Mariano Socolovsky, Robert J Spinner, Eric L Zager","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS251142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.8.JNS251142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Core outcome sets (COSs) are needed to promote data consistency across studies as well as data synthesis and comparability. The aim of the current study was to use a modified Delphi process to develop a COS for lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy (LFCN), hereafter COS-LFCN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-stage approach was used to develop the COS-LFCN: 1) consortium development, 2) literature review to identify potential outcome measures, 3) Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion, 4) Delphi survey to develop definitions, and 5) consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. This study followed the Core Outcome Set - STAndards for Development, (COS-STAD) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 25 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 14 countries. The final COS-LFCN consisted of 41 factors and outcomes covering domains of demographics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor/sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 12 months, with the consensus optimal time points for assessment being preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS for LFCN and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-LFCN should serve as the minimum data to be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on LFCN. Incorporation of this COS will help improve consistency in reporting, data synthesis and comparability, and minimize outcome reporting bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John P Marinelli, Ghazal S Daher, Karl R Khandalavala, Eric E Babajanian, James R Dornhoffer, Christine M Lohse, Bruce E Pollock, Paul Brown, Jamie J Van Gompel, Maria Peris Celda, Brian A Neff, Colin L W Driscoll, Matthew L Carlson, Michael J Link
Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the long-term efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the primary treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma.
Methods: Adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included.
Results: A total of 749 patients met inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 566, 76%) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle at SRS. The median patient age at SRS was 62 years, half (50%) of the patients were women, and 744 (99%) exhibited House-Brackmann grade I facial nerve function at SRS. A total of 42 patients experienced radiosurgical failure and underwent salvage treatment; the median duration of follow-up for the patients who did not undergo salvage treatment was 7.0 years. Overall tumor control rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after SRS were 100% (100%-100%, 718), 98% (97%-99%, 589), 96% (94%-97%, 464), 92% (90%-95%, 258), and 91% (89%-94%, 125), respectively. Patient age (hazard ratio [HR] for a 10-year increase of 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19; p = 0.5), presence of a macrocystic tumor (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14-2.46; p = 0.5), and treated tumor volume (HR for a 1-cm3 increase of 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.18; p = 0.8) were not significantly associated with the risk of salvage. Three distinct post-SRS tumor behavior patterns were observed, with 13% of patients demonstrating tumor pseudoprogression, all but 4 of whom demonstrated pseudoprogression by year 5 post-SRS.
Conclusions: SRS demonstrates durable tumor control through 15 years of follow-up in most patients (91%); however, a minority are found to still experience SRS failure even beyond 10 years of surveillance. Although occurring in only a minority of patients, tumor pseudoprogression can be evident out to 5 years or longer post-SRS.
目的:本研究的目的是描述单段立体定向放射手术(SRS)原发性治疗散发性前庭神经鞘瘤的长期疗效。方法:纳入2000年至2022年接受SRS的散发性前庭神经鞘瘤成人(≥18岁)患者。结果:共有749例患者符合纳入标准,大多数(n = 566, 76%)患者在SRS时肿瘤延伸至桥小脑角。SRS时患者的中位年龄为62岁,半数(50%)患者为女性,744例(99%)患者在SRS时表现出House-Brackmann I级面神经功能。42例患者放疗失败,接受抢救治疗;未接受抢救治疗的患者的中位随访时间为7.0年。SRS后1、3、5、10和15年的总体肿瘤控制率(95% CI,仍有危险的人数)分别为100%(100%-100%,718)、98%(97%-99%,589)、96%(94%-97%,464)、92%(90%-95%,258)和91%(89%-94%,125)。患者年龄(10年风险比[HR]增加0.92,95% CI 0.71-1.19, p = 0.5)、是否存在大囊性肿瘤(HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14-2.46, p = 0.5)和治疗肿瘤体积(1 cm3增加的HR为1.02,95% CI 0.88-1.18, p = 0.8)与挽救风险无显著相关。观察到三种不同的srs后肿瘤行为模式,13%的患者表现出肿瘤假性进展,其中4例患者在srs后第5年表现出假性进展。结论:SRS在大多数患者(91%)的15年随访中显示持久的肿瘤控制;然而,即使超过10年的监测,少数人仍然经历SRS失败。虽然只发生在少数患者中,但在srs后5年或更长时间内,肿瘤假性进展可能很明显。
{"title":"Long-term tumor control after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma.","authors":"John P Marinelli, Ghazal S Daher, Karl R Khandalavala, Eric E Babajanian, James R Dornhoffer, Christine M Lohse, Bruce E Pollock, Paul Brown, Jamie J Van Gompel, Maria Peris Celda, Brian A Neff, Colin L W Driscoll, Matthew L Carlson, Michael J Link","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS25829","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS25829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to describe the long-term efficacy of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the primary treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 749 patients met inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 566, 76%) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle at SRS. The median patient age at SRS was 62 years, half (50%) of the patients were women, and 744 (99%) exhibited House-Brackmann grade I facial nerve function at SRS. A total of 42 patients experienced radiosurgical failure and underwent salvage treatment; the median duration of follow-up for the patients who did not undergo salvage treatment was 7.0 years. Overall tumor control rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after SRS were 100% (100%-100%, 718), 98% (97%-99%, 589), 96% (94%-97%, 464), 92% (90%-95%, 258), and 91% (89%-94%, 125), respectively. Patient age (hazard ratio [HR] for a 10-year increase of 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19; p = 0.5), presence of a macrocystic tumor (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14-2.46; p = 0.5), and treated tumor volume (HR for a 1-cm3 increase of 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.18; p = 0.8) were not significantly associated with the risk of salvage. Three distinct post-SRS tumor behavior patterns were observed, with 13% of patients demonstrating tumor pseudoprogression, all but 4 of whom demonstrated pseudoprogression by year 5 post-SRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SRS demonstrates durable tumor control through 15 years of follow-up in most patients (91%); however, a minority are found to still experience SRS failure even beyond 10 years of surveillance. Although occurring in only a minority of patients, tumor pseudoprogression can be evident out to 5 years or longer post-SRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-02DOI: 10.3171/2025.8.JNS243158
Timothy R Smith, John B Lazor, Jonathan R Slotkin, Eric J Woodard, Sourabh Boruah, David A Bichara, Michael C Brown, Brian J Hess, Kevin T Foley
Objective: Cranial bone flap fixation is typically achieved by using titanium plates and screws (TPS), which are the standard of care. However, the use of hardware to achieve long-term bone fixation and healing across a kerf line poses challenges and potential complications, including infection, nonunion, loosening, cranial flap bone resorption, pain, cosmetic deformity, and CSF leakage. The use of a tetracalcium phosphate and phosphoserine (TTCP-PS) regenerative bone adhesive to fixate cranial flaps has been previously shown to be advantageous compared to TPS in an in vivo ovine model and a human cadaveric model. However, the potential impact of TTCP-PS on the underlying brain has not been previously studied. To investigate the local tissue effects of TTCP-PS bone adhesive compared to TPS, a clinically relevant sheep craniotomy model was developed.
Methods: Twelve skeletally mature crossbred sheep were used in this study. All craniotomies and surgical procedures were performed by an experienced, US-trained, licensed, and practicing attending neurosurgeon. Bilateral parietal craniotomies were created using a Medtronic Midas Rex craniotome and perforator. Durotomy was performed and repaired in half of the subjects. Craniotomies were repaired with TPS or the TTCP-PS bone adhesive. CT scans were performed postoperatively and at 12 weeks. Histopathology was performed on the brain and cranial bone.
Results: All sheep reached the study endpoint. Histopathological changes in underlying cerebral cortical tissue were comparable in magnitude and incidence between groups (minimal superficial cortical deformation/loss and/or malacia/loss). The magnitude of microgliosis and astrogliosis related to the cortical changes was comparable between groups (minimal/mild and minimal, respectively). Histopathological findings were procedural in nature, associated with the craniotomy model, and unrelated to the bone flap fixation method. The histological changes did not result in clinically adverse effects.
Conclusions: TTCP-PS was safe, producing no significant difference in adverse effects on local tissues compared to standard craniotomy with plate and screw fixation. This is the first study to quantify histological changes in the underlying cerebral cortex due to standard craniotomy technique.
{"title":"Demonstration of the safety of a regenerative bone adhesive for cranial flap fixation in a 12-week clinically relevant sheep model.","authors":"Timothy R Smith, John B Lazor, Jonathan R Slotkin, Eric J Woodard, Sourabh Boruah, David A Bichara, Michael C Brown, Brian J Hess, Kevin T Foley","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS243158","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS243158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cranial bone flap fixation is typically achieved by using titanium plates and screws (TPS), which are the standard of care. However, the use of hardware to achieve long-term bone fixation and healing across a kerf line poses challenges and potential complications, including infection, nonunion, loosening, cranial flap bone resorption, pain, cosmetic deformity, and CSF leakage. The use of a tetracalcium phosphate and phosphoserine (TTCP-PS) regenerative bone adhesive to fixate cranial flaps has been previously shown to be advantageous compared to TPS in an in vivo ovine model and a human cadaveric model. However, the potential impact of TTCP-PS on the underlying brain has not been previously studied. To investigate the local tissue effects of TTCP-PS bone adhesive compared to TPS, a clinically relevant sheep craniotomy model was developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve skeletally mature crossbred sheep were used in this study. All craniotomies and surgical procedures were performed by an experienced, US-trained, licensed, and practicing attending neurosurgeon. Bilateral parietal craniotomies were created using a Medtronic Midas Rex craniotome and perforator. Durotomy was performed and repaired in half of the subjects. Craniotomies were repaired with TPS or the TTCP-PS bone adhesive. CT scans were performed postoperatively and at 12 weeks. Histopathology was performed on the brain and cranial bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All sheep reached the study endpoint. Histopathological changes in underlying cerebral cortical tissue were comparable in magnitude and incidence between groups (minimal superficial cortical deformation/loss and/or malacia/loss). The magnitude of microgliosis and astrogliosis related to the cortical changes was comparable between groups (minimal/mild and minimal, respectively). Histopathological findings were procedural in nature, associated with the craniotomy model, and unrelated to the bone flap fixation method. The histological changes did not result in clinically adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TTCP-PS was safe, producing no significant difference in adverse effects on local tissues compared to standard craniotomy with plate and screw fixation. This is the first study to quantify histological changes in the underlying cerebral cortex due to standard craniotomy technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12874171/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146028826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew L Carlson, John P Marinelli, Eric E Babajanian, Ghazal S Daher, James R Dornhoffer, Karl R Khandalavala, Christine M Lohse, Jamie J Van Gompel, Maria Peris Celda, Brian A Neff, Colin L W Driscoll, Michael J Link
Objective: Wait-and-scan surveillance is now commonly employed for initial management of small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas. Although small differences in tumor size are unlikely to impact outcomes significantly, treatment with either radiosurgery or microsurgery is usually recommended following radiological detection of tumor growth. The objective of the current study was to identify potential inflection points in vestibular schwannoma tumor size, where the risks of treatment with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) accelerate to inform timing of intervention.
Methods: Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included.
Results: A total of 749 patients with a median age at SRS of 62 years were studied, the majority (n = 566 [76%]) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) at SRS. The optimal tumor size cut point to predict SRS failure and need for salvage treatment was 4 mm or more of CPA extension (c-index 0.59, HR 3.60, p = 0.01). The optimal tumor size cut point to predict the outcome of facial nerve paresis was 13 mm or more of CPA extension, resulting in a c-index of 0.63 (HR 2.88, p = 0.01). Among patients with at least 3 months of surveillance before SRS, those with a tumor growth rate ≥ 2.5 mm/year were more likely to undergo salvage treatment than those with a growth rate < 2.5 mm/year, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance (HR 1.82, p = 0.18).
Conclusions: The risk of SRS failure requiring salvage treatment and the risk of post-SRS facial nerve paralysis increase at sizes of approximately 4 and 13 mm extension into the CPA, respectively, providing a size threshold anchor to help guide treatment decision-making regarding timing of SRS. Furthermore, rapid tumor growth during the initial wait-and-scan period may be associated with an increased risk of radiosurgical failure, which may influence choice of treatment.
目的:等待扫描监测是目前普遍采用的初始管理的中小型前庭神经鞘瘤。尽管肿瘤大小的微小差异不太可能显著影响预后,但通常建议在放射学检测到肿瘤生长后进行放射手术或显微手术治疗。当前研究的目的是确定前庭神经鞘瘤肿瘤大小的潜在拐点,在这些拐点上,单次立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗的风险会加快,从而为干预时机提供信息。方法:纳入2000年至2022年接受SRS的散发性前庭神经鞘瘤成人(≥18岁)患者。结果:共有749例患者在SRS时的中位年龄为62岁,其中大多数(n = 566[76%])患者在SRS时肿瘤延伸至桥小脑角(CPA)。预测SRS失败和需要挽救治疗的最佳肿瘤大小切点是CPA延伸4mm或更多(c-index 0.59, HR 3.60, p = 0.01)。预测面神经麻痹预后的最佳肿瘤大小切点为CPA延伸13mm及以上,c-index为0.63 (HR 2.88, p = 0.01)。在SRS前监测至少3个月的患者中,肿瘤生长速度≥2.5 mm/年的患者比生长速度< 2.5 mm/年的患者更有可能接受挽救治疗,但差异无统计学意义(HR 1.82, p = 0.18)。结论:SRS失败需要挽救治疗的风险和SRS后面神经麻痹的风险分别在延伸至CPA约4和13 mm时增加,为指导SRS时机的治疗决策提供了一个大小阈值锚定。此外,在最初的等待和扫描期间,肿瘤的快速生长可能与放射手术失败的风险增加有关,这可能影响治疗的选择。
{"title":"Defining clinically significant tumor size in sporadic vestibular schwannoma to inform timing of radiosurgery during wait-and-scan management: further evidence supporting size threshold surveillance.","authors":"Matthew L Carlson, John P Marinelli, Eric E Babajanian, Ghazal S Daher, James R Dornhoffer, Karl R Khandalavala, Christine M Lohse, Jamie J Van Gompel, Maria Peris Celda, Brian A Neff, Colin L W Driscoll, Michael J Link","doi":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS25830","DOIUrl":"10.3171/2025.8.JNS25830","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wait-and-scan surveillance is now commonly employed for initial management of small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas. Although small differences in tumor size are unlikely to impact outcomes significantly, treatment with either radiosurgery or microsurgery is usually recommended following radiological detection of tumor growth. The objective of the current study was to identify potential inflection points in vestibular schwannoma tumor size, where the risks of treatment with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) accelerate to inform timing of intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma who underwent SRS from 2000 through 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 749 patients with a median age at SRS of 62 years were studied, the majority (n = 566 [76%]) of whom had tumors extending into the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) at SRS. The optimal tumor size cut point to predict SRS failure and need for salvage treatment was 4 mm or more of CPA extension (c-index 0.59, HR 3.60, p = 0.01). The optimal tumor size cut point to predict the outcome of facial nerve paresis was 13 mm or more of CPA extension, resulting in a c-index of 0.63 (HR 2.88, p = 0.01). Among patients with at least 3 months of surveillance before SRS, those with a tumor growth rate ≥ 2.5 mm/year were more likely to undergo salvage treatment than those with a growth rate < 2.5 mm/year, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance (HR 1.82, p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of SRS failure requiring salvage treatment and the risk of post-SRS facial nerve paralysis increase at sizes of approximately 4 and 13 mm extension into the CPA, respectively, providing a size threshold anchor to help guide treatment decision-making regarding timing of SRS. Furthermore, rapid tumor growth during the initial wait-and-scan period may be associated with an increased risk of radiosurgical failure, which may influence choice of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146029975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}