首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences最新文献

英文 中文
Psychiatric Manifestations in Early to Middle Stages of Fragile X-Associated Tremor-Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS). 脆性 X 相关震颤共济失调综合征(FXTAS)早中期的精神表现。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230215
Mei Hung Chi, James A Bourgeois, Ellery Santos, Kyoungmi Kim, Matt Dominic Ponzini, Guadalupe Mendoza, Andrea Schneider, David Hessl, Flora Tassone, Randi J Hagerman

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to assess the psychiatric manifestations of early to middle stages of fragile X-associated tremor-ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and their relationship with executive function and FMR1 cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) repeat numbers across genders.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from 100 participants (62 men, 38 women; mean±SD age=67.11±7.90 years) with FXTAS stage 1, 2, or 3 were analyzed, including demographic information, cognitive measures, psychiatric assessments (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale-II [BDS-II]), and CGG repeat number.

Results: Participants with FXTAS stage 3 exhibited significantly worse psychiatric outcomes compared with participants with either stage 1 or 2, with distinct gender-related differences. Men showed differences in anxiety and hostility between stage 3 and combined stages 1 and 2, whereas women exhibited differences in anxiety, depression, interpersonal sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and somatization, as well as in the Global Severity Index, the Positive Symptom Distress Index, and the Positive Symptom Total. Among male participants, negative correlations were observed between BDS-II total scores and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as well as between anxiety and CGG repeat number.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that even at early FXTAS stages, patients have significant cognitive and other psychiatric symptoms, with notable gender-specific differences. This study underscores the clinical and prognostic relevance of comorbid psychiatric conditions in FXTAS, highlighting the need for early intervention and targeted support for individuals with relatively mild motor deficits.

研究目的本研究旨在评估脆性X相关震颤-共济失调综合征(FXTAS)早中期的精神表现及其与不同性别的执行功能和FMR1胞嘧啶-鸟嘌呤-鸟嘌呤(CGG)重复数之间的关系:分析了100名FXTAS 1、2或3期患者(62名男性,38名女性;平均±SD年龄=67.11±7.90岁)的横断面数据,包括人口统计学信息、认知测量、精神评估(症状核对表-90-修订版和行为控制障碍量表-II [BDS-II])和CGG重复数:结果:FXTAS 第 3 阶段的参与者与第 1 阶段或第 2 阶段的参与者相比,精神状况明显较差,且存在明显的性别差异。男性在焦虑和敌意方面表现出第三阶段与第一和第二阶段的差异,而女性则在焦虑、抑郁、人际关系敏感、强迫症状和躯体化方面表现出差异,在总体严重程度指数、积极症状压力指数和积极症状总指数方面也表现出差异。在男性参与者中,BDS-II总分与强迫症状之间呈负相关,焦虑与CGG重复次数之间也呈负相关:这些研究结果表明,即使在 FXTAS 的早期阶段,患者也会出现明显的认知症状和其他精神症状,并存在明显的性别差异。这项研究强调了 FXTAS 患者合并精神疾病在临床和预后方面的相关性,突出了对运动障碍相对较轻的患者进行早期干预和有针对性支持的必要性。
{"title":"Psychiatric Manifestations in Early to Middle Stages of Fragile X-Associated Tremor-Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS).","authors":"Mei Hung Chi, James A Bourgeois, Ellery Santos, Kyoungmi Kim, Matt Dominic Ponzini, Guadalupe Mendoza, Andrea Schneider, David Hessl, Flora Tassone, Randi J Hagerman","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230215","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to assess the psychiatric manifestations of early to middle stages of fragile X-associated tremor-ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and their relationship with executive function and <i>FMR1</i> cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) repeat numbers across genders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 100 participants (62 men, 38 women; mean±SD age=67.11±7.90 years) with FXTAS stage 1, 2, or 3 were analyzed, including demographic information, cognitive measures, psychiatric assessments (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale-II [BDS-II]), and CGG repeat number.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with FXTAS stage 3 exhibited significantly worse psychiatric outcomes compared with participants with either stage 1 or 2, with distinct gender-related differences. Men showed differences in anxiety and hostility between stage 3 and combined stages 1 and 2, whereas women exhibited differences in anxiety, depression, interpersonal sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and somatization, as well as in the Global Severity Index, the Positive Symptom Distress Index, and the Positive Symptom Total. Among male participants, negative correlations were observed between BDS-II total scores and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as well as between anxiety and CGG repeat number.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that even at early FXTAS stages, patients have significant cognitive and other psychiatric symptoms, with notable gender-specific differences. This study underscores the clinical and prognostic relevance of comorbid psychiatric conditions in FXTAS, highlighting the need for early intervention and targeted support for individuals with relatively mild motor deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141902022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship Between Posttraumatic Headache and Depression After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. 轻度脑外伤后创伤后头痛与抑郁之间的关系。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230143
Marissa L Beal, Kevin J Psoter, Kathleen T Bechtold, Veeran Nagpaul, Matthew E Peters, Vani Rao, Timothy E Van Meter, Hayley Falk, Frederick K Korley, Durga Roy

Objective: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can lead to psychiatric and somatic symptoms for some patients, including posttraumatic headache (PTH) and depression. This study attempted to further establish the relationship between PTH and depression following mTBI and investigate whether the presence of PTH immediately following injury can identify patients at risk for developing depressive symptoms up to 6 months later.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of data from Head Injury Serum Markers for Assessing Response to Trauma (HeadSMART), a prospective study of adult patients in the emergency department with head injury. Participants included 265 patients who met criteria for mTBI and completed the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, to identify PTH within 24 hours after injury, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, to assess depressive symptoms during follow-up. Measures were completed at the initial visit immediately after the injury in the emergency department and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits.

Results: Patients with acute PTH (aPTH) at time of injury were more likely to report PTH at 1, 3, and 6 months. They also had more severe depressive symptoms and a greater likelihood of clinically significant depression at all time points.

Conclusions: Patients with aPTH within 24 hours after injury were more likely to report continued symptoms of PTH and clinically significant depression at 1, 3, and 6 months. These findings provide support for using the presence of aPTH in the emergency department following mTBI as an indicator for monitoring persistent PTH and depressive symptoms in the postacute recovery period.

目的:轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)可导致部分患者出现精神和躯体症状,包括创伤后头痛(PTH)和抑郁症。本研究试图进一步确定轻微创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后 PTH 与抑郁症之间的关系,并调查受伤后立即出现 PTH 是否能识别出患者在 6 个月后出现抑郁症状的风险:本研究是对评估创伤反应的头部损伤血清标志物(HeadSMART)数据的二次分析,HeadSMART是一项针对急诊科头部损伤成年患者的前瞻性研究。参与者包括265名符合mTBI标准的患者,他们在受伤后24小时内填写了Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷以确定PTH,并填写了患者健康问卷-9以评估随访期间的抑郁症状。在受伤后立即到急诊科进行初诊以及1个月、3个月和6个月的随访时都完成了测量:结果:受伤时患有急性肺结核(aPTH)的患者更有可能在 1、3 和 6 个月时报告患有肺结核。在所有时间点,他们的抑郁症状也更严重,更有可能出现临床意义上的抑郁症:结论:受伤后 24 小时内出现 PTH 的患者更有可能在 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时持续出现 PTH 症状和临床意义上的抑郁。这些发现支持将 mTBI 后急诊科出现 aPTH 作为监测急性恢复期后持续 PTH 和抑郁症状的指标。
{"title":"Relationship Between Posttraumatic Headache and Depression After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Marissa L Beal, Kevin J Psoter, Kathleen T Bechtold, Veeran Nagpaul, Matthew E Peters, Vani Rao, Timothy E Van Meter, Hayley Falk, Frederick K Korley, Durga Roy","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230143","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230143","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can lead to psychiatric and somatic symptoms for some patients, including posttraumatic headache (PTH) and depression. This study attempted to further establish the relationship between PTH and depression following mTBI and investigate whether the presence of PTH immediately following injury can identify patients at risk for developing depressive symptoms up to 6 months later.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of data from Head Injury Serum Markers for Assessing Response to Trauma (HeadSMART), a prospective study of adult patients in the emergency department with head injury. Participants included 265 patients who met criteria for mTBI and completed the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, to identify PTH within 24 hours after injury, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, to assess depressive symptoms during follow-up. Measures were completed at the initial visit immediately after the injury in the emergency department and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with acute PTH (aPTH) at time of injury were more likely to report PTH at 1, 3, and 6 months. They also had more severe depressive symptoms and a greater likelihood of clinically significant depression at all time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with aPTH within 24 hours after injury were more likely to report continued symptoms of PTH and clinically significant depression at 1, 3, and 6 months. These findings provide support for using the presence of aPTH in the emergency department following mTBI as an indicator for monitoring persistent PTH and depressive symptoms in the postacute recovery period.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141902023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An 11-Fold Higher Risk of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment With Hispanic Ethnicity and Baseline Neuropsychiatric Symptoms. 西班牙裔和基线神经精神症状引发轻度认知障碍的风险高出 11 倍。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230180
Ricardo Salazar, Alok K Dwivedi, Luis A Alvarado, Michael Escamilla

Objective: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) have been linked to cognitive decline. This study explored ethnic differences and the effects of baseline NPSs on incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among 386 Hispanic and non-Hispanic participants from the Texas Harris Alzheimer's Research Study.

Methods: Data on NPSs from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire were available for all participants. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the effect of ≥1 NPS at baseline and Hispanic ethnicity on incident MCI over a 7-year follow-up period.

Results: NPSs at baseline were associated with incident MCI for Hispanic participants but not non-Hispanic participants. Being Hispanic with at least one NPS at baseline had an 11-times higher risk of incident MCI.

Conclusions: The Hispanic participants converted to MCI to a greater extent than the non-Hispanic participants. Only depressive symptoms increased the risk of MCI among non-Hispanics. Being of Hispanic ethnicity and having NPSs appeared to jointly increase the risk of progressing to MCI. To better understand the Alzheimer's disease continuum, further studies should explore other cultural, genetic, and medical risk factors influencing disease progression. Our findings strongly suggest the need to incorporate NPSs as outcomes of disease progression in future clinical trials involving Hispanic participants.

目的:神经精神症状(NPS)与认知能力下降有关。本研究探讨了德克萨斯州哈里斯阿尔茨海默氏症研究的 386 名西班牙裔和非西班牙裔参与者的种族差异以及基线 NPSs 对轻度认知障碍(MCI)事件的影响:所有参与者的 NPSs 数据均来自神经精神量表问卷。结果:基线NPS≥1和西班牙裔对7年随访期间MCI事件的影响采用Cox比例危险回归模型进行估计:基线时的NPS与西班牙裔参与者的MCI事件有关,但与非西班牙裔参与者无关。基线时至少有一次NPS的西班牙裔参与者发生MCI的风险比非西班牙裔高11倍:西班牙裔参与者比非西班牙裔参与者更容易转变为 MCI。在非西班牙裔参与者中,只有抑郁症状会增加 MCI 风险。西班牙裔和非老年痴呆症患者似乎共同增加了发展为 MCI 的风险。为了更好地了解阿尔茨海默病的连续性,进一步的研究应该探索影响疾病进展的其他文化、遗传和医疗风险因素。我们的研究结果有力地表明,在未来有西班牙裔参与者参与的临床试验中,有必要将NPSs作为疾病进展的结果。
{"title":"An 11-Fold Higher Risk of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment With Hispanic Ethnicity and Baseline Neuropsychiatric Symptoms.","authors":"Ricardo Salazar, Alok K Dwivedi, Luis A Alvarado, Michael Escamilla","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230180","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) have been linked to cognitive decline. This study explored ethnic differences and the effects of baseline NPSs on incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among 386 Hispanic and non-Hispanic participants from the Texas Harris Alzheimer's Research Study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on NPSs from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire were available for all participants. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the effect of ≥1 NPS at baseline and Hispanic ethnicity on incident MCI over a 7-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPSs at baseline were associated with incident MCI for Hispanic participants but not non-Hispanic participants. Being Hispanic with at least one NPS at baseline had an 11-times higher risk of incident MCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Hispanic participants converted to MCI to a greater extent than the non-Hispanic participants. Only depressive symptoms increased the risk of MCI among non-Hispanics. Being of Hispanic ethnicity and having NPSs appeared to jointly increase the risk of progressing to MCI. To better understand the Alzheimer's disease continuum, further studies should explore other cultural, genetic, and medical risk factors influencing disease progression. Our findings strongly suggest the need to incorporate NPSs as outcomes of disease progression in future clinical trials involving Hispanic participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Race-Ethnicity, Rurality, and Age in Prospective Preferences and Concerns Regarding Closed-Loop Implanted Neural Devices. 种族-民族、乡村和年龄对闭环植入式神经设备的前瞻性偏好和关注。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230190
Bryan B Chen, Tobias Haeusermann, Abraham Dada, Roy H Hamilton, Jennifer E James, Kristina Celeste Fong, Daniel Dohan, Winston Chiong

Objective: Responsive and human-centered neurotechnology development requires attention to public perceptions, particularly among groups underserved by existing treatments.

Methods: The authors conducted a preregistered nationally representative survey (https://osf.io/ej9h2) using the NORC at the University of Chicago AmeriSpeak panel. One vignette compared an implanted neural device with surgical resection in a scenario involving epilepsy, and another compared an implanted neural device with medications in a scenario involving mood disorders. The survey also contained questions about respondents' confidence that a device would be available if needed and confidence that enough research has been conducted among people like themselves. Responses were entered into nested survey-weighted logistic regression models, including a base demographic model (to test the overall effect of demographic factors) and an adjusted model that also included socioeconomic, religious and political, and health care access predictors.

Results: A total of 1,047 adults responded to the survey, which oversampled Black non-Hispanic (N=214), Hispanic (N=210), and rural (N=219) Americans. In the base demographic model, older Americans were more likely to prefer an implanted device in the two scenarios, and non-Hispanic Black Americans were less likely than non-Hispanic White Americans to prefer a device; rural Americans were less confident than urban or suburban Americans in having access, and non-Hispanic Black and rural Americans were less confident that enough research has been conducted among people like themselves. In adjusted models, income was a key mediator, partially explaining the effect of age and the contrast between Black and White non-Hispanic respondents on preferences for a device in the epilepsy scenario and fully explaining the effect of rurality on confidence in access.

Conclusions: Demographic differences in prospective preferences and concerns highlight the importance of including members of underserved communities in neurotechnology development.

目标以人为本的顺应性神经技术开发需要关注公众的看法,尤其是现有治疗方法服务不足的群体:作者利用芝加哥大学 NORC AmeriSpeak 小组进行了一次预先登记的全国代表性调查 (https://osf.io/ej9h2)。其中一个小故事在涉及癫痫的场景中比较了植入式神经设备和手术切除,另一个小故事在涉及情绪障碍的场景中比较了植入式神经设备和药物治疗。调查还包含一些问题,涉及受访者是否相信在需要时可以获得设备,以及是否相信已经在与自己类似的人群中开展了足够的研究。受访者的回答被输入嵌套的调查加权逻辑回归模型,其中包括一个基本人口统计模型(用于测试人口统计因素的总体影响)和一个调整模型,该模型还包括社会经济、宗教和政治以及医疗保健访问预测因素:共有 1,047 名成年人对调查做出了回应,其中非西班牙裔黑人(214 人)、西班牙裔美国人(210 人)和农村美国人(219 人)样本过多。在基本人口统计模型中,在两种情况下,美国老年人更倾向于植入装置,而非西班牙裔美国黑人比非西班牙裔美国白人更不倾向于植入装置;美国农村居民比城市或郊区居民对获得装置的信心更低,而非西班牙裔美国黑人和农村居民对在他们这样的人群中已开展足够研究的信心更低。在调整后的模型中,收入是一个关键的中介因素,它部分解释了年龄以及黑人和白人非西班牙裔受访者之间的对比对癫痫情景中设备偏好的影响,并完全解释了农村地区对获得设备的信心的影响:结论:预期偏好和关注点的人口统计学差异凸显了将未得到充分服务的社区成员纳入神经技术开发的重要性。
{"title":"Race-Ethnicity, Rurality, and Age in Prospective Preferences and Concerns Regarding Closed-Loop Implanted Neural Devices.","authors":"Bryan B Chen, Tobias Haeusermann, Abraham Dada, Roy H Hamilton, Jennifer E James, Kristina Celeste Fong, Daniel Dohan, Winston Chiong","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230190","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Responsive and human-centered neurotechnology development requires attention to public perceptions, particularly among groups underserved by existing treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a preregistered nationally representative survey (https://osf.io/ej9h2) using the NORC at the University of Chicago AmeriSpeak panel. One vignette compared an implanted neural device with surgical resection in a scenario involving epilepsy, and another compared an implanted neural device with medications in a scenario involving mood disorders. The survey also contained questions about respondents' confidence that a device would be available if needed and confidence that enough research has been conducted among people like themselves. Responses were entered into nested survey-weighted logistic regression models, including a base demographic model (to test the overall effect of demographic factors) and an adjusted model that also included socioeconomic, religious and political, and health care access predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,047 adults responded to the survey, which oversampled Black non-Hispanic (N=214), Hispanic (N=210), and rural (N=219) Americans. In the base demographic model, older Americans were more likely to prefer an implanted device in the two scenarios, and non-Hispanic Black Americans were less likely than non-Hispanic White Americans to prefer a device; rural Americans were less confident than urban or suburban Americans in having access, and non-Hispanic Black and rural Americans were less confident that enough research has been conducted among people like themselves. In adjusted models, income was a key mediator, partially explaining the effect of age and the contrast between Black and White non-Hispanic respondents on preferences for a device in the epilepsy scenario and fully explaining the effect of rurality on confidence in access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demographic differences in prospective preferences and concerns highlight the importance of including members of underserved communities in neurotechnology development.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142017720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Refining Research Diagnostic Criteria for Catatonia Among Delirium, Medical, Affective, and Psychosis Patient Groups. 在谵妄、内科、情感和精神病患者群体中完善紧张症的研究诊断标准。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230100
Paula T Trzepacz, José G Franco, Subho Chakrabarti, Abhishek Ghosh, Swapnajeet Sahoo, Rahul Chakravarty, Sandeep Grover

Objective: The authors proposed catatonia diagnostic criteria that require the presence of three neuropsychiatric symptom clusters, rated over 24 hours; this system differs from other symptom clustering proposals and is intended to increase diagnostic rigor over Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) or DSM-5 criteria.

Methods: By applying new BFCRS item score thresholds, symptoms were clustered into three categories to comprise the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Catatonia (RDCC): akinesia (criterion A), unusual motor signs (criterion B), and behavioral signs (criterion C). RDCC symptom clusters were analyzed in four prospectively evaluated patient groups (delirium, medical, affective, and psychosis) (N=341).

Results: Use of the RDCC, compared with the DSM-5-TR and BFCRS, resulted in far fewer diagnoses of catatonia in the four patient groups: medical, N=1 out of 42 (2%); affective, N=1 out of 45 (2%); psychosis, N=3 out of 53 (6%); and delirium, N=0 out of 201. Permutations of the RDCC with more relaxed criteria were assessed, requiring either symptom thresholds or numbers of symptoms to meet criteria, resulting in catatonia rate gradations between those obtained with the RDCC and those obtained with current systems. The Cochrane Q test found that the DSM-5-TR was not dissimilar to the RDCC, if fulfilling numerical thresholds for criteria A-C, although any level of symptom severity was allowed. Confirmatory factor analysis with three goodness-of-fit indexes validated the RDCC.

Conclusions: The RDCC requires akinetic symptoms on the basis of literature demonstrating their high BFCRS prevalence and exploratory factor analysis co-loadings, plus symptoms from unusual motor and behavioral signs. Compared with current lenient diagnostic approaches, having the symptoms required by the RDCC produced lower catatonia rates in the psychosis, affective, and medical groups and revealed no patients with catatonia in the delirium group. Subdividing DSM-5-TR symptoms into several different criteria may improve diagnosis. RDCC symptom clusters are both research data-based and amenable to further research for validation.

目的:作者提出的紧张症诊断标准要求在24小时内出现三个神经精神症状群;该系统不同于其他症状群提议,旨在提高诊断的严谨性,而非布什-弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表(Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale,BFCRS)或DSM-5标准:方法:通过应用新的布什-弗朗西斯卡他性评定量表(BFCRS)项目评分阈值,将症状分为三类,组成卡他性障碍研究诊断标准(RDCC):运动障碍(标准 A)、异常运动征象(标准 B)和行为征象(标准 C)。对四组前瞻性评估患者(谵妄、内科、情感和精神病)的 RDCC 症状群进行了分析(N=341):结果:与 DSM-5-TR 和 BFCRS 相比,使用 RDCC 诊断出的四组患者中紧张性精神障碍的人数要少得多:内科,42 人中有 1 人(2%);情感,45 人中有 1 人(2%);精神病,53 人中有 3 人(6%);谵妄,201 人中有 0 人。我们评估了具有更宽松标准的 RDCC 的排列组合,要求症状阈值或症状数量符合标准,从而得出 RDCC 和当前系统得出的紧张症发生率之间的分级。Cochrane Q 检验发现,如果符合标准 A-C 的数字阈值,DSM-5-TR 与 RDCC 并无差别,尽管允许任何症状严重程度。使用三个拟合优度指数进行的确认性因子分析验证了 RDCC:RDCC需要动眼神经症状,其依据是文献证明其在BFCRS中的高流行率和探索性因子分析的共同负荷,以及异常运动和行为体征的症状。与当前宽松的诊断方法相比,具备 RDCC 所要求的症状会降低精神病组、情感组和内科组的紧张症发生率,并且在谵妄组中没有发现紧张症患者。将 DSM-5-TR 的症状细分为几个不同的标准可能会改善诊断。RDCC 症状群既以研究数据为基础,又适合进一步研究验证。
{"title":"Refining Research Diagnostic Criteria for Catatonia Among Delirium, Medical, Affective, and Psychosis Patient Groups.","authors":"Paula T Trzepacz, José G Franco, Subho Chakrabarti, Abhishek Ghosh, Swapnajeet Sahoo, Rahul Chakravarty, Sandeep Grover","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230100","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors proposed catatonia diagnostic criteria that require the presence of three neuropsychiatric symptom clusters, rated over 24 hours; this system differs from other symptom clustering proposals and is intended to increase diagnostic rigor over Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) or DSM-5 criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By applying new BFCRS item score thresholds, symptoms were clustered into three categories to comprise the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Catatonia (RDCC): akinesia (criterion A), unusual motor signs (criterion B), and behavioral signs (criterion C). RDCC symptom clusters were analyzed in four prospectively evaluated patient groups (delirium, medical, affective, and psychosis) (N=341).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of the RDCC, compared with the DSM-5-TR and BFCRS, resulted in far fewer diagnoses of catatonia in the four patient groups: medical, N=1 out of 42 (2%); affective, N=1 out of 45 (2%); psychosis, N=3 out of 53 (6%); and delirium, N=0 out of 201. Permutations of the RDCC with more relaxed criteria were assessed, requiring either symptom thresholds or numbers of symptoms to meet criteria, resulting in catatonia rate gradations between those obtained with the RDCC and those obtained with current systems. The Cochrane Q test found that the DSM-5-TR was not dissimilar to the RDCC, if fulfilling numerical thresholds for criteria A-C, although any level of symptom severity was allowed. Confirmatory factor analysis with three goodness-of-fit indexes validated the RDCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RDCC requires akinetic symptoms on the basis of literature demonstrating their high BFCRS prevalence and exploratory factor analysis co-loadings, plus symptoms from unusual motor and behavioral signs. Compared with current lenient diagnostic approaches, having the symptoms required by the RDCC produced lower catatonia rates in the psychosis, affective, and medical groups and revealed no patients with catatonia in the delirium group. Subdividing DSM-5-TR symptoms into several different criteria may improve diagnosis. RDCC symptom clusters are both research data-based and amenable to further research for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142391161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional Neurological Disorders Among Patients With Tremor. 震颤患者的功能性神经紊乱
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230126
José Fidel Baizabal-Carvallo, Marlene Alonso-Juarez, Joseph Jankovic

Objective: Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are increasingly recognized in the general population and neurology clinics, and there is evidence that patients with neurological disorders are more likely to have a FND. This study was designed to identify the clinical features of FNDs among patients with movement disorders when the two disorders coexist.

Methods: The clinical histories and video recordings of 150 consecutive patients with tremors were examined: the types of tremor included essential tremor; essential tremor plus; dystonic tremor; tremor associated with dystonia; and drug-induced, myoclonic, orthostatic, task-specific, parkinsonian, Holmes, and unclassified tremor. Using criteria for "possible" and "probable" coexistent FND, clinical features that helped differentiate between functional and other neurological tremors were identified.

Results: There were 27 (18%) patients with functional manifestations, and 17 (11% of full sample) of these patients had signs suggestive of comorbid functional tremor. Patients with comorbid functional manifestations were younger at presentation, and these patients had greater severity of tremor, particularly upper limb postural tremor. Functional manifestations were not more commonly observed among patients with any particular type of tremor, except for patients with Holmes tremor, who were more likely to have comorbid functional neurological manifestations.

Conclusions: About 18% of patients with diverse types of tremors also had comorbid functional neurological manifestations. Of the coexistent FNDs, functional tremor was the most common. Patients with co-occurring functional and other neurological tremors presented for evaluation at a younger age and had greater severity of arm tremor than those without comorbid functional neurological manifestations.

目的:功能性神经紊乱(FNDs)在普通人群和神经病学临床中的认知度越来越高,有证据表明,患有神经系统疾病的患者更有可能患有 FNDs。本研究旨在确定运动障碍患者同时患有这两种疾病时 FND 的临床特征:研究人员对 150 名连续震颤患者的临床病史和视频记录进行了检查:震颤类型包括本质性震颤、本质性震颤加本质性震颤、肌张力障碍性震颤、肌张力障碍相关性震颤、药物诱发性震颤、肌阵挛性震颤、正位性震颤、任务特异性震颤、帕金森病性震颤、霍姆斯震颤和未分类震颤。根据 "可能 "和 "可能 "并存 FND 的标准,确定了有助于区分功能性震颤和其他神经性震颤的临床特征:结果:有 27 名(18%)患者有功能性表现,其中 17 名(占全部样本的 11%)患者有提示合并功能性震颤的体征。合并功能性表现的患者发病时年龄较轻,震颤的程度也较严重,尤其是上肢姿势性震颤。除了霍姆斯震颤患者更有可能合并神经系统功能性表现外,其他类型震颤患者的功能性表现并不常见:结论:约 18% 的不同类型震颤患者还合并有功能性神经系统表现。结论:约有 18% 的不同类型震颤患者同时伴有功能性神经表现,其中功能性震颤最为常见。与没有合并功能性神经系统表现的患者相比,合并功能性震颤和其他神经系统震颤的患者接受评估的年龄更小,手臂震颤的严重程度也更严重。
{"title":"Functional Neurological Disorders Among Patients With Tremor.","authors":"José Fidel Baizabal-Carvallo, Marlene Alonso-Juarez, Joseph Jankovic","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230126","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are increasingly recognized in the general population and neurology clinics, and there is evidence that patients with neurological disorders are more likely to have a FND. This study was designed to identify the clinical features of FNDs among patients with movement disorders when the two disorders coexist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical histories and video recordings of 150 consecutive patients with tremors were examined: the types of tremor included essential tremor; essential tremor plus; dystonic tremor; tremor associated with dystonia; and drug-induced, myoclonic, orthostatic, task-specific, parkinsonian, Holmes, and unclassified tremor. Using criteria for \"possible\" and \"probable\" coexistent FND, clinical features that helped differentiate between functional and other neurological tremors were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 27 (18%) patients with functional manifestations, and 17 (11% of full sample) of these patients had signs suggestive of comorbid functional tremor. Patients with comorbid functional manifestations were younger at presentation, and these patients had greater severity of tremor, particularly upper limb postural tremor. Functional manifestations were not more commonly observed among patients with any particular type of tremor, except for patients with Holmes tremor, who were more likely to have comorbid functional neurological manifestations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>About 18% of patients with diverse types of tremors also had comorbid functional neurological manifestations. Of the coexistent FNDs, functional tremor was the most common. Patients with co-occurring functional and other neurological tremors presented for evaluation at a younger age and had greater severity of arm tremor than those without comorbid functional neurological manifestations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterizing Neurobehavioral Dysregulation Among Former American Football Players: Findings From the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. 前美式橄榄球运动员神经行为失调的特征:DIAGNOSE CTE 研究项目的发现。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230133
Surya V Pulukuri, Tessa R Fagle, Diana Trujillo-Rodriguez, Suzan van Amerongen, Charles Bernick, Yonas E Geda, Jennifer V Wethe, Elaine R Peskind, Douglas I Katz, Michael L Alosco, Joseph N Palmisano, Yorghos Tripodis, Charles H Adler, Laura J Balcer, Eric M Reiman, Martha E Shenton, Jeffrey L Cummings, Robert A Stern

Objective: Neurobehavioral dysregulation (NBD), a core clinical feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, encompasses neuropsychiatric symptoms reported among individuals with a history of repetitive head impact exposure, including contact sport athletes. The objective of this study was to examine the construct and subconstructs of NBD through a series of factor and cluster analyses.

Methods: Six clinician-scientists selected self-report questionnaire items relevant to NBD from seven available neuropsychiatric scales through a blinded voting process. These items were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses in a sample of 178 former college and professional American football players and 60 asymptomatic individuals without a history of repetitive head impact exposure. All participants were enrolled in the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Research Project. Factor scores were generated on the basis of the optimal expert-informed model for NBD. Construct validity was assessed with neuropsychiatric scales not included in generation of the factor scores. Cluster analyses with NBD factor scores were used to examine symptom profiles.

Results: Factor analyses confirmed that NBD was composed of four subconstructs: explosivity, emotional dyscontrol, impulsivity, and affective lability. Cluster analyses indicated four distinct symptom profiles of NBD in this group of former football players: asymptomatic (N=80, 45%), short fuse (N=33, 19%), high affective lability (N=34, 19%), and high NBD (N=31, 17%).

Conclusions: These findings characterize NBD as a multifaceted clinical construct with a heterogeneous presentation, providing a foundation for empirical work on the diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome and research on the neurobiological underpinnings of NBD.

目的:神经行为失调(NBD)是外伤性脑病综合征的一个核心临床特征,包括有重复头部撞击史的个体(包括接触性运动运动员)的神经精神症状。本研究的目的是通过一系列因子和聚类分析来研究 NBD 的结构和子结构:方法:六位临床科学家通过盲法投票,从现有的七个神经精神量表中挑选出与 NBD 相关的自我报告问卷项目。这些项目在 178 名前大学和职业美式足球运动员以及 60 名无症状且无重复头部撞击史的样本中进行了确认性因子分析。所有参与者都参加了慢性创伤性脑病客观研究和评估研究项目的诊断、成像和遗传学网络。因子得分是根据专家提供的 NBD 最佳模型生成的。在生成因子得分时,未将神经精神量表包括在内,而是使用神经精神量表对结构效度进行了评估。使用 NBD 因子得分进行聚类分析,以检查症状特征:因子分析证实 NBD 由四个子结构组成:爆发性、情绪控制障碍、冲动性和情感易变性。聚类分析显示,在这群退役足球运动员中,NBD 有四种不同的症状特征:无症状(80 人,占 45%)、短导火线(33 人,占 19%)、高情感易变性(34 人,占 19%)和高 NBD(31 人,占 17%):这些研究结果表明,NBD 是一种多方面的临床表现,具有异质性,为创伤性脑病综合征诊断标准的实证工作和 NBD 的神经生物学基础研究奠定了基础。
{"title":"Characterizing Neurobehavioral Dysregulation Among Former American Football Players: Findings From the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project.","authors":"Surya V Pulukuri, Tessa R Fagle, Diana Trujillo-Rodriguez, Suzan van Amerongen, Charles Bernick, Yonas E Geda, Jennifer V Wethe, Elaine R Peskind, Douglas I Katz, Michael L Alosco, Joseph N Palmisano, Yorghos Tripodis, Charles H Adler, Laura J Balcer, Eric M Reiman, Martha E Shenton, Jeffrey L Cummings, Robert A Stern","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230133","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230133","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neurobehavioral dysregulation (NBD), a core clinical feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, encompasses neuropsychiatric symptoms reported among individuals with a history of repetitive head impact exposure, including contact sport athletes. The objective of this study was to examine the construct and subconstructs of NBD through a series of factor and cluster analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six clinician-scientists selected self-report questionnaire items relevant to NBD from seven available neuropsychiatric scales through a blinded voting process. These items were subjected to confirmatory factor analyses in a sample of 178 former college and professional American football players and 60 asymptomatic individuals without a history of repetitive head impact exposure. All participants were enrolled in the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Research Project. Factor scores were generated on the basis of the optimal expert-informed model for NBD. Construct validity was assessed with neuropsychiatric scales not included in generation of the factor scores. Cluster analyses with NBD factor scores were used to examine symptom profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factor analyses confirmed that NBD was composed of four subconstructs: explosivity, emotional dyscontrol, impulsivity, and affective lability. Cluster analyses indicated four distinct symptom profiles of NBD in this group of former football players: asymptomatic (N=80, 45%), short fuse (N=33, 19%), high affective lability (N=34, 19%), and high NBD (N=31, 17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings characterize NBD as a multifaceted clinical construct with a heterogeneous presentation, providing a foundation for empirical work on the diagnostic criteria for traumatic encephalopathy syndrome and research on the neurobiological underpinnings of NBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"38-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827700/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141734402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional Vision Loss Among Adults and Children: Literature Review and Comparative Analysis. 成人与儿童的功能性视力丧失:文献回顾与比较分析。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240027
Parker D Brady, Roberto Sergio Hernandez, Amber Salter, Melanie Truong-Le

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare functional vision loss (FVL) among adults and children, including its presentation and the biopsychosocial factors that may contribute to FVL development.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases were searched in April 2023 for studies reporting data on visual acuity loss (VAL), visual field defects (VFDs), psychiatric disorders, or biopsychosocial stressors of patients with FVL. Studies were excluded if they did not report information on the specific outcomes for all patients or reported on only a subset of FVL patients.

Results: Overall, 27 studies were included, comprising 1,476 patients. Twenty-six articles reported on visual symptoms, 14 on psychiatric disorders, and 11 on biopsychosocial stressors. The prevalence of VAL was similar among adults (80%) compared with children (83%), but VFDs were significantly more common among adults (86% in adults vs. 50% in children). The prevalence of a history of psychiatric disorders was similar among both adults (42%) and children (23%). Adults most commonly reported accidents or physical trauma (31%) as predisposing or precipitating factors for VAL, whereas children most frequently reported family or home stress (19%).

Conclusions: VFDs were found to be more common among adults than among children with FVL. Among adults and children with FVL, different psychiatric and biopsychosocial stressors were reported. This review was limited by the heterogeneous data among studies and unstandardized methods of data collection and reporting. Future research may seek to better understand the differences between adults and children with FVL and explore possible treatment options.

目的:本研究的目的是比较成人和儿童的功能性视力丧失(FVL),包括其表现和可能导致FVL发展的生物心理社会因素。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和PsycInfo数据库,于2023年4月检索报告FVL患者的视力丧失(VAL)、视野缺陷(vfd)、精神障碍或生物心理社会压力源的研究数据。如果研究没有报告所有患者的具体结果信息或仅报告FVL患者的一部分,则排除研究。结果:总共纳入了27项研究,包括1476名患者。26篇文章报道了视觉症状,14篇报道了精神障碍,11篇报道了生物心理社会压力源。成人VAL患病率(80%)与儿童相似(83%),但vfd在成人中更为常见(成人为86%,儿童为50%)。精神病史的患病率在成人(42%)和儿童(23%)中相似。成人最常报告的事故或身体创伤(31%)是诱发或诱发VAL的因素,而儿童最常报告的是家庭或家庭压力(19%)。结论:vfd在成人中比在儿童中更常见。在FVL的成人和儿童中,报告了不同的精神和生物心理社会压力源。本综述受到研究数据异质性和数据收集和报告方法不标准化的限制。未来的研究可能会寻求更好地了解成人和儿童FVL之间的差异,并探索可能的治疗方案。
{"title":"Functional Vision Loss Among Adults and Children: Literature Review and Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Parker D Brady, Roberto Sergio Hernandez, Amber Salter, Melanie Truong-Le","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare functional vision loss (FVL) among adults and children, including its presentation and the biopsychosocial factors that may contribute to FVL development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases were searched in April 2023 for studies reporting data on visual acuity loss (VAL), visual field defects (VFDs), psychiatric disorders, or biopsychosocial stressors of patients with FVL. Studies were excluded if they did not report information on the specific outcomes for all patients or reported on only a subset of FVL patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 27 studies were included, comprising 1,476 patients. Twenty-six articles reported on visual symptoms, 14 on psychiatric disorders, and 11 on biopsychosocial stressors. The prevalence of VAL was similar among adults (80%) compared with children (83%), but VFDs were significantly more common among adults (86% in adults vs. 50% in children). The prevalence of a history of psychiatric disorders was similar among both adults (42%) and children (23%). Adults most commonly reported accidents or physical trauma (31%) as predisposing or precipitating factors for VAL, whereas children most frequently reported family or home stress (19%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VFDs were found to be more common among adults than among children with FVL. Among adults and children with FVL, different psychiatric and biopsychosocial stressors were reported. This review was limited by the heterogeneous data among studies and unstandardized methods of data collection and reporting. Future research may seek to better understand the differences between adults and children with FVL and explore possible treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"appineuropsych20240027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breaking Down Binary Thinking in Neuropsychiatry. 打破神经精神病学中的二元思维。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240044
Joseph J Cooper, Barbara Schildkrout
{"title":"Breaking Down Binary Thinking in Neuropsychiatry.","authors":"Joseph J Cooper, Barbara Schildkrout","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"appineuropsych20240044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in Traumatic Brain Injury With Donepezil: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 多奈哌齐对外伤性脑损伤记忆修复的多中心评价:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230055
David B Arciniegas, Emily J Almeida, Angelle M Sander, Jay A Bogaards, Joseph T Giacino, Flora M Hammond, Cynthia L Harrison-Felix, Tessa Hart, Jessica M Ketchum, David C Mellick, Mark Sherer, John Whyte, Ross D Zafonte

Memory impairments are common chronic and functionally important consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Among patients with persistent verbal memory impairments due to TBI-related cholinergic deficits, donepezil (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) may improve these and related problems. The Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in TBI with Donepezil (MEMRI-TBI-D) study, a four-site, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 10-week clinical trial, evaluated the efficacy of donepezil on verbal memory impairments, co-occurring cognitive and noncognitive neuropsychiatric problems, and functional status among persons with severe, persistent, and functionally limiting verbal memory problems at least 6 months after mild, moderate, or severe TBI. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability measures were assessed. Seventy-five participants were randomly assigned to donepezil (N=37) and placebo (N=38) groups. In both modified intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, donepezil significantly improved memory (i.e., verbal learning, as measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Trials 1-3, the primary outcome measure) when compared with placebo. Treatment-responder rates in the donepezil and placebo groups were 42% and 18%, respectively, yielding a number needed to treat of 3.5. Among donepezil responders, delayed recall and processing speed also improved significantly. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates for donepezil and placebo were 46% and 8%, respectively, and mild or moderate (85%); diarrhea and nausea were significantly more common in the donepezil group, yielding a number needed to harm of 6.25 and a likelihood to be helped or harmed ratio of 1.79. These results suggest that donepezil is an efficacious treatment for severe, persistent memory impairments after predominantly severe TBI, with a relatively favorable safety and tolerability profile.

记忆障碍是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)常见的慢性和功能性重要后果。多奈哌齐(一种乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂)可以改善由于脑损伤相关胆碱能缺陷导致的持续性言语记忆障碍。多奈哌齐对创伤性脑损伤记忆修复的多中心评估(MEMRI-TBI-D)研究是一项四中心、随机、平行组、双盲、安慰剂对照、为期10周的临床试验,评估了多奈哌齐对轻度、中度或重度脑损伤后至少6个月的重度、持续性和功能性限制性言语记忆问题患者的言语记忆损伤、并发认知和非认知神经精神问题和功能状态的疗效。评估了疗效、安全性和耐受性措施。75名参与者被随机分配到多奈哌齐组(N=37)和安慰剂组(N=38)。在修改后的治疗意向和方案分析中,与安慰剂相比,多奈哌齐显著改善了记忆(即,根据霍普金斯语言学习测试-修订总试验1-3(主要结果测量)测量的语言学习)。多奈哌齐组和安慰剂组的治疗反应率分别为42%和18%,产生治疗所需的数字为3.5。在多奈哌齐应答者中,延迟回忆和处理速度也显著提高。多奈哌齐和安慰剂治疗后出现的不良事件发生率分别为46%和8%,轻度或中度(85%);在多奈哌齐组中,腹泻和恶心明显更常见,造成伤害所需的数字为6.25,帮助或伤害的可能性比为1.79。这些结果表明,多奈哌齐是治疗严重脑外伤后严重、持续性记忆障碍的有效药物,具有相对良好的安全性和耐受性。
{"title":"Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in Traumatic Brain Injury With Donepezil: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"David B Arciniegas, Emily J Almeida, Angelle M Sander, Jay A Bogaards, Joseph T Giacino, Flora M Hammond, Cynthia L Harrison-Felix, Tessa Hart, Jessica M Ketchum, David C Mellick, Mark Sherer, John Whyte, Ross D Zafonte","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Memory impairments are common chronic and functionally important consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Among patients with persistent verbal memory impairments due to TBI-related cholinergic deficits, donepezil (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) may improve these and related problems. The Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in TBI with Donepezil (MEMRI-TBI-D) study, a four-site, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 10-week clinical trial, evaluated the efficacy of donepezil on verbal memory impairments, co-occurring cognitive and noncognitive neuropsychiatric problems, and functional status among persons with severe, persistent, and functionally limiting verbal memory problems at least 6 months after mild, moderate, or severe TBI. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability measures were assessed. Seventy-five participants were randomly assigned to donepezil (N=37) and placebo (N=38) groups. In both modified intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, donepezil significantly improved memory (i.e., verbal learning, as measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Trials 1-3, the primary outcome measure) when compared with placebo. Treatment-responder rates in the donepezil and placebo groups were 42% and 18%, respectively, yielding a number needed to treat of 3.5. Among donepezil responders, delayed recall and processing speed also improved significantly. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates for donepezil and placebo were 46% and 8%, respectively, and mild or moderate (85%); diarrhea and nausea were significantly more common in the donepezil group, yielding a number needed to harm of 6.25 and a likelihood to be helped or harmed ratio of 1.79. These results suggest that donepezil is an efficacious treatment for severe, persistent memory impairments after predominantly severe TBI, with a relatively favorable safety and tolerability profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"appineuropsych20230055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142769804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1