首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma最新文献

英文 中文
Internal Versus External Fixation of the Anterior Ring in Unstable Pelvic Fractures Was Associated With Discharge to Home. 不稳定骨盆骨折前环内固定与外固定与出院有关。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002971
Joseph T Patterson, Ian G Hasegawa, Brandan Sakka, Andrew P Collins, Soroush Shabani, Andrew M Duong, Li Ding, Monica D Wong, Reza Firoozabadi, Joshua L Gary

Objective: To determine whether anterior internal or definitive external fixation combined with posterior internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures was associated with frequency of discharge to home.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Two Level 1 trauma centers and one academic tertiary referral center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients aged 16 years or older with unstable OTA/AO 61B/C pelvis fractures treated with operative fixation of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons from October 2020 to November 2022.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the adjusted odds of discharge to home with internal fixation compared with definitive external fixation of the anterior pelvic ring on multivariable analysis considering patient, injury, and treatment characteristics. Secondary outcomes included bivariable associations between anterior fixation type and intensive care unit (ICU) days, ventilator days, hospital length of stay, and hospital charges.

Results: Seventy-nine patients (65%) who were treated with internal fixation presented with higher mean Glasgow Coma Scale scores (13.5 ± 3.6 vs. 10.5 ± 5.4, P < 0.01) than 43 patients treated with definitive external fixation but were otherwise similar regarding age [mean 48.1 ± 19.9 vs. 41.2 ± 15.8, range (16-96) versus (19-77), P = 0.07], sex (36.7% vs. 44.2% female, P = 0.42193), mean body mass index (28.4 ± 6.2 vs. 28.7 ± 7.4 kg/m 2 , P = 0.93), any medical comorbidities (50.6% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.62), substance use (13.9% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.09884), insurance type ( P = 0.97), mean Injury Severity Score (24.8 ± 12.0 vs. 29.5 ± 14.0, range 5-57 vs. 10-57, P = 0.14), pelvis fracture pattern ( P = 0.12187), and preinjury living environment ( P = 0.67695). On multivariable analysis, patients treated with internal fixation were more frequently discharged to home (53.2% vs. 27.9%, odds ratio 3.39, 95% confidence interval 1.29-9.84, P = 0.0198). Patients treated with anterior internal fixation also experienced fewer mean ICU days (6.0 ± 8.8 vs. 9.8 ± 16.3, P = 0.0213), ventilator days (3.5 ± 8.2 vs. 6.9 ± 15.9, P < 0.0081), and hospital days (18.7 ± 16.2 vs. 31.2 ± 26.7, P < 0.01) and incurred less hospital charges ($278,563.29±$261,602.35 vs. $580,625.98±$503,067.98, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Patients who received anterior and posterior internal fixation of their unstable pelvis fractures were more likely to discharge to home than patients treated with anterior definitive external fixation and posterior internal fixation. Anterior internal fixation was also associated with fewer ICU, ventilator, and hospital days, as well as less hospital charges.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Autho

目的确定前路内固定或明确外固定结合后路内固定治疗不稳定骨盆骨折是否与出院回家的频率有关:设计:回顾性队列研究:设计:回顾性队列研究:两家一级创伤中心和一家学术性三级转诊中心:2020年10月至2022年11月期间,由三位受过研究培训的创伤骨科外科医生对不稳定OTA/AO 61B/C骨盆骨折患者进行骨盆前后环手术固定治疗:主要结果是在考虑患者、损伤和治疗特征的多变量分析中,内固定与骨盆前环明确外固定相比,调整后出院回家的几率。次要结果包括前固定类型与重症监护室(ICU)天数、呼吸机天数、住院时间和住院费用之间的双变量关联:结果:接受内固定治疗的 79 名患者(65%)的平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较高(13.5±3.6 vs 10.5±5.4,p):不稳定骨盆骨折患者接受前路和后路内固定治疗后,出院回家的几率高于接受前路明确外固定和后路内固定治疗的患者。前路内固定术还能减少重症监护室、呼吸机和住院天数,降低住院费用:证据等级:治疗 III 级。
{"title":"Internal Versus External Fixation of the Anterior Ring in Unstable Pelvic Fractures Was Associated With Discharge to Home.","authors":"Joseph T Patterson, Ian G Hasegawa, Brandan Sakka, Andrew P Collins, Soroush Shabani, Andrew M Duong, Li Ding, Monica D Wong, Reza Firoozabadi, Joshua L Gary","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002971","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002971","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether anterior internal or definitive external fixation combined with posterior internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures was associated with frequency of discharge to home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two Level 1 trauma centers and one academic tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients aged 16 years or older with unstable OTA/AO 61B/C pelvis fractures treated with operative fixation of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons from October 2020 to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the adjusted odds of discharge to home with internal fixation compared with definitive external fixation of the anterior pelvic ring on multivariable analysis considering patient, injury, and treatment characteristics. Secondary outcomes included bivariable associations between anterior fixation type and intensive care unit (ICU) days, ventilator days, hospital length of stay, and hospital charges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine patients (65%) who were treated with internal fixation presented with higher mean Glasgow Coma Scale scores (13.5 ± 3.6 vs. 10.5 ± 5.4, P < 0.01) than 43 patients treated with definitive external fixation but were otherwise similar regarding age [mean 48.1 ± 19.9 vs. 41.2 ± 15.8, range (16-96) versus (19-77), P = 0.07], sex (36.7% vs. 44.2% female, P = 0.42193), mean body mass index (28.4 ± 6.2 vs. 28.7 ± 7.4 kg/m 2 , P = 0.93), any medical comorbidities (50.6% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.62), substance use (13.9% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.09884), insurance type ( P = 0.97), mean Injury Severity Score (24.8 ± 12.0 vs. 29.5 ± 14.0, range 5-57 vs. 10-57, P = 0.14), pelvis fracture pattern ( P = 0.12187), and preinjury living environment ( P = 0.67695). On multivariable analysis, patients treated with internal fixation were more frequently discharged to home (53.2% vs. 27.9%, odds ratio 3.39, 95% confidence interval 1.29-9.84, P = 0.0198). Patients treated with anterior internal fixation also experienced fewer mean ICU days (6.0 ± 8.8 vs. 9.8 ± 16.3, P = 0.0213), ventilator days (3.5 ± 8.2 vs. 6.9 ± 15.9, P < 0.0081), and hospital days (18.7 ± 16.2 vs. 31.2 ± 26.7, P < 0.01) and incurred less hospital charges ($278,563.29±$261,602.35 vs. $580,625.98±$503,067.98, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received anterior and posterior internal fixation of their unstable pelvis fractures were more likely to discharge to home than patients treated with anterior definitive external fixation and posterior internal fixation. Anterior internal fixation was also associated with fewer ICU, ventilator, and hospital days, as well as less hospital charges.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Autho","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143492315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expedited Hip Fracture Surgery in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants Does Not Increase Perioperative Blood Loss. 直接口服抗凝剂的髋部骨折患者加速手术不会增加围手术期出血量。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002974
Juntian Wang, Peter Aldo Giammanco, Paal Nilssen, Julia Stone, Kathleen Breda, Milton Little, Charles Moon, Peter Yim, Carol Lin

Objectives: To compare blood loss and transfusion rates in geriatric patients with hip fracture on direct oral anticoagulants undergoing surgery ≤24 hours from admission (Expedited group) versus 24-72 hours from admission (Delayed group).

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients aged ≥65 years with a femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA 31A, 31B, and 32) on factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban) before admission from April 2014 to April 2024 were included.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Primary outcomes were preoperative blood loss (difference between admission hemoglobin (Hgb) and lowest preoperative Hgb), overall blood loss (difference between admission Hgb and lowest postoperative Hgb within 4 days postoperation), and transfusion rates. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and 90-day complication (cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal bleed, pneumonia, acute kidney failure, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates.

Results: The Expedited group (n = 67) and Delayed group (n = 183) were similar in age (85.2 ± 6.8 years (67-97) versus 84.4 ± 7.5 years (65-101), P = 0.405) and sex (50.7% vs. 37.2% male, P = 0.084). The Delayed group had higher preoperative blood loss (1.2 ± 1.3 g/dL vs. 0.80 ± 1.0 g/dL, P = 0.003) with no differences in overall blood loss (2.9 ± 0.1.7 g/dL vs. 2.9 ± 1.7 g/dL, P = 0.881) and transfusion rates (28.4% vs. 25.4%, P = 0.634). The Expedited group had a shorter length of stay (6.0 ± 5.6 days vs. 7.1 ± 3.3 days, P < 0.001). The Delayed group had a higher 90-day complication rate (41.5% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.001). The Expedited group did not have higher rates of 90-day readmission (22.4% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.593), reoperation (4.5% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.730), or mortality (9.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.581).

Conclusions: For geriatric patients with hip fracture on factor Xa inhibitors, surgery ≤24 hours from admission reduced preoperative blood loss without increasing risk for overall bleeding, transfusion, or 90-day complication.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

目的:比较老年髋部骨折患者在入院≤24小时(加速组)和24-72小时(延迟组)手术后直接口服抗凝剂的失血量和输血率。方法:设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:纳入2014年4月至2024年4月入院前服用Xa因子抑制剂(阿哌沙班或利伐沙班)的年龄≥65岁、股骨颈、粗隆间或粗隆下骨折(AO/OTA 31A、31B和32)的患者。结果测量和比较:主要结果为术前失血量(入院血红蛋白(Hgb)与最低术前血红蛋白的差异)、总失血量(入院血红蛋白与术后最低血红蛋白在术后4天内的差异)和输血率。次要结局是住院时间(LOS)和90天并发症(脑血管意外、心肌梗死、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、尿路感染、胃肠道出血、肺炎、急性肾衰竭、手术部位感染)、再入院、再手术和死亡率。结果:加速组(n=67)和延迟组(n=183)在年龄(85.2±6.8岁(67-97)比84.4±7.5岁(65-101),p=0.405)和性别(50.7%比37.2%,p=0.084)上相似。延迟组术前出血量较高(1.2±1.3 g/dL vs. 0.80±1.0 g/dL, p=0.003),但总出血量(2.9±0.1.7 g/dL vs. 2.9±1.7 g/dL, p=0.881)和输血率(28.4% vs. 25.4%, p=0.634)差异无统计学意义。加速组的LOS较短(6.0±5.6天vs. 7.1±3.3天)。结论:对于服用Xa因子抑制剂的老年髋部骨折患者,入院后≤24小时的手术可减少术前失血量,而不会增加总体出血、输血或90天并发症的风险。证据等级:治疗性III级。
{"title":"Expedited Hip Fracture Surgery in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants Does Not Increase Perioperative Blood Loss.","authors":"Juntian Wang, Peter Aldo Giammanco, Paal Nilssen, Julia Stone, Kathleen Breda, Milton Little, Charles Moon, Peter Yim, Carol Lin","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002974","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare blood loss and transfusion rates in geriatric patients with hip fracture on direct oral anticoagulants undergoing surgery ≤24 hours from admission (Expedited group) versus 24-72 hours from admission (Delayed group).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients aged ≥65 years with a femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA 31A, 31B, and 32) on factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban) before admission from April 2014 to April 2024 were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Primary outcomes were preoperative blood loss (difference between admission hemoglobin (Hgb) and lowest preoperative Hgb), overall blood loss (difference between admission Hgb and lowest postoperative Hgb within 4 days postoperation), and transfusion rates. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and 90-day complication (cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal bleed, pneumonia, acute kidney failure, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Expedited group (n = 67) and Delayed group (n = 183) were similar in age (85.2 ± 6.8 years (67-97) versus 84.4 ± 7.5 years (65-101), P = 0.405) and sex (50.7% vs. 37.2% male, P = 0.084). The Delayed group had higher preoperative blood loss (1.2 ± 1.3 g/dL vs. 0.80 ± 1.0 g/dL, P = 0.003) with no differences in overall blood loss (2.9 ± 0.1.7 g/dL vs. 2.9 ± 1.7 g/dL, P = 0.881) and transfusion rates (28.4% vs. 25.4%, P = 0.634). The Expedited group had a shorter length of stay (6.0 ± 5.6 days vs. 7.1 ± 3.3 days, P < 0.001). The Delayed group had a higher 90-day complication rate (41.5% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.001). The Expedited group did not have higher rates of 90-day readmission (22.4% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.593), reoperation (4.5% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.730), or mortality (9.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.581).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For geriatric patients with hip fracture on factor Xa inhibitors, surgery ≤24 hours from admission reduced preoperative blood loss without increasing risk for overall bleeding, transfusion, or 90-day complication.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"314-319"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143567434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Posterior Plating Versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures. 后路钢板与前后路螺钉在固定皮隆骨折后柱中的应用。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966
Mostafa M Baraka, Tamer A Fayyad, Mootaz F Thakeb, Mina A Lamei, Mohamed A Al Kersh

Objectives: To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior column fractures in pilon injuries regarding the (1) functional and (2) radiological outcomes and (3) the incidence of complications.

Methods:

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: All patients with 2-, 3-, and 4-column fracture according to the 4-column classification (orthopedic trauma association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures, and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.

Results: Thirty patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A [mean age 42.3 (range 19-65)] and 15 patients in group B [mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58)]. The mean follow-up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B, respectively. The AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared with group B ( P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared with indirect reduction and AP screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT05303389.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

目的:比较前后路螺钉(AP螺钉)与后路支撑钢板固定pilon损伤后柱骨折的结果,包括1)功能和2)放射学结果以及3)并发症的发生率。方法:设计:前瞻性、随机临床试验。地点:单中心,一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:研究期间所有根据四柱分类(OTA/AO 43-C1和43-C2)发生二柱、三柱和四柱骨折的患者均符合入选条件。将患者随机分为两组:A组采用后支板直接复位固定(A组)和AP螺钉间接复位固定(B组)。排除标准包括开放性骨折、病理性骨折、开放性骨折和骨折合并神经血管损伤的儿童年龄组。最小随访时间为24个月。结果测量和比较:主要结果是通过术后x线平片和计算机断层扫描(CT)评估复位质量。次要结果包括美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)功能评分和并发症发生率。结果:纳入30例患者,15例患者随机分为A组(平均年龄42.3岁,范围19 ~ 65岁)和B组(平均年龄38.0岁,范围23 ~ 58岁)。平均随访32个月(24 ~ 45个月)。A组解剖复位80%,B组解剖复位26.7%。A组AOFAS评分显著高于B组(p=0.03)。两组患者愈合时间及并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:与间接复位和前后路螺钉相比,直接复位和后路支架钢板的解剖复位比例更高。这反映在显著较高的AOFAS分数上。
{"title":"Posterior Plating Versus Anterior to Posterior Screws in Fixation of Posterior Column in Pilon Fractures.","authors":"Mostafa M Baraka, Tamer A Fayyad, Mootaz F Thakeb, Mina A Lamei, Mohamed A Al Kersh","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002966","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the results of anterior to posterior screws (AP screws) versus posterior buttress plating in the fixation of posterior column fractures in pilon injuries regarding the (1) functional and (2) radiological outcomes and (3) the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Center, Level 1 trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients with 2-, 3-, and 4-column fracture according to the 4-column classification (orthopedic trauma association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 43-C1 and 43-C2) during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: direct reduction and fixation by posterior buttress plating (group A) and indirect reduction with fixation by AP screws (group B). Exclusion criteria included pediatric age group with open physis, pathological fractures, open fractures, and fractures with neurovascular injuries. The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was the quality of reduction as evaluated using postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included, 15 patients were randomized to group A [mean age 42.3 (range 19-65)] and 15 patients in group B [mean age 38.0 in group B (range 23-58)]. The mean follow-up was 32 months (24-45 months). Anatomical reduction was achieved in 80% and 26.7% of group A and group B, respectively. The AOFAS score was significantly higher in group A compared with group B ( P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the time to union and the complication rates ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher percentage of anatomical reduction was associated with direct reduction and posterior buttress plating compared with indirect reduction and AP screws. This was reflected by a significantly higher AOFAS score.Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT05303389.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"288-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143458362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Indications for and Potential Benefits of Pelvis Stress Radiographs in Lateral Compression Injuries: What is the Supporting Evidence? State of the Art Review. 骨盆应力x线片在侧压迫损伤中的适应症和潜在益处:支持证据是什么?《艺术评论》
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003022
Burapachaisri Aonnicha, Sagi H Claude, Vallier Heather A, Tornetta Paul

Lateral compression pelvic fractures represent a spectrum of injuries with a range instability. Dynamic pelvic stress examinations (DPSE) including exam under anesthesia and lateral stress radiographs offer the potential advantage of more accurately identifying patients who may benefit from surgery to decrease malunion and improve clinical outcomes. This article examines the current literature on DPSE and critically analyzes the validity of its role in indicating patients for surgery. In addition, recommendations on the use of DPSE in clinical practice based on the current literature and surgeon experience are provided.

侧位压迫性骨盆骨折代表了一系列范围不稳定的损伤。动态骨盆压力检查(DPSE)包括麻醉下检查和侧应力x线片提供了更准确地识别可能从手术中获益的患者的潜在优势,以减少畸形愈合和改善临床结果。这篇文章检查了目前关于DPSE的文献,并批判性地分析了其在指示患者手术中的作用的有效性。此外,根据目前的文献和外科医生的经验,提出了在临床实践中使用DPSE的建议。
{"title":"Indications for and Potential Benefits of Pelvis Stress Radiographs in Lateral Compression Injuries: What is the Supporting Evidence? State of the Art Review.","authors":"Burapachaisri Aonnicha, Sagi H Claude, Vallier Heather A, Tornetta Paul","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lateral compression pelvic fractures represent a spectrum of injuries with a range instability. Dynamic pelvic stress examinations (DPSE) including exam under anesthesia and lateral stress radiographs offer the potential advantage of more accurately identifying patients who may benefit from surgery to decrease malunion and improve clinical outcomes. This article examines the current literature on DPSE and critically analyzes the validity of its role in indicating patients for surgery. In addition, recommendations on the use of DPSE in clinical practice based on the current literature and surgeon experience are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144187183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Above a Total Knee Replacement: An Updated Compatibility and Technique Guide for Fixation With a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail. 致编辑:全膝关节置换术后股骨髁上假体周围骨折:逆行髓内钉固定的最新兼容性和技术指南。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003020
Rachel Honig, Marcus Sciadini
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Above a Total Knee Replacement: An Updated Compatibility and Technique Guide for Fixation With a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail.","authors":"Rachel Honig, Marcus Sciadini","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003020","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144159682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding: Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Above a Total Knee Replacement: An Updated Compatibility and Technique Guide for Fixation with a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail. 关于全膝关节置换术后股骨髁上假体周围骨折的回复:逆行髓内钉固定的最新兼容性和技术指南。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003019
Daniel E Gerow, Hunter L Ross, Andrew Bodrogi, Kory J Johnson, Terrence J Endres
{"title":"Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding: Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures Above a Total Knee Replacement: An Updated Compatibility and Technique Guide for Fixation with a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail.","authors":"Daniel E Gerow, Hunter L Ross, Andrew Bodrogi, Kory J Johnson, Terrence J Endres","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144159687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Maximum Compressive Forces of Rescue Screws with Varying Diameters and Thread Patterns in Synthetic Osteoporotic and Normal Bone Models. 在合成骨质疏松和正常骨模型中不同直径和螺纹模式的救援螺钉的最大压缩力。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003018
Tyler Thorne, Makoa Mau, Lucas Marchand, Justin M Haller

Objectives: "Rescue screws" are used to address screw stripping during fracture fixation. Bone screw fasteners (BSF; Osteocentric Technologies) have a thread pattern that may enhance purchase. This study compared maximum compressive forces of traditional buttress screws (TBS; Stryker) and BSF in rescue/lag modes using synthetic models of osteoporotic and normal bone.

Methods: 2.7-mm TBS screws were placed in lag mode and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Rescue screws, varied by screw type and diameter, were placed in lag mode through previously stripped lag holes, using appropriate glide holes in the proximal cortex and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Force differences were compared between the stripped 2.7-mm TBS screws, and each rescue screws (3.5-mm TBS, 2.7-mm BSF, and 3.5-mm BSF). Trials were conducted on two synthetic-layered biomechanical models, a synthetic 20-10 pound-per-cubic-foot (PCF) osteoporotic model and a 40-30 PCF normal bone density model.

Results: 2.7-mm rescue BSF produced similar compression to the original 2.7-mm TBS lag screw (BSF-501.0 N vs TBS-577.0 N, p=0.441) in normal bone, but lower compression in osteoporotic bone (61.0 N vs 104.0 N, p=0.001). 3.5-mm TBS and BSF rescue screws increased the amount of compression in osteoporotic bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 136.0 N (16.4) vs 61.0 N (14.5); 3.5mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 198.4 N (4.2) vs 61.0 N (14.5) p<0.001) and in normal bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 968.0 N (30.3) vs 501.0 N (197.7); 3.5-mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 1136.0 N (51.2) vs 501.0 N (197.7) p<0.001) versus 2.7-mm rescue screws.3.5-mm rescue BSF produced more compression than 3.5-mm TBS (198.4 N (4.2) vs 136.0 N (16.3), p<0.001) in osteoporotic bone, but not in normal bone (1136.0 N (51.2) vs 968.0 N (30.3), p=0.106).

Conclusions: After stripping of a 2.7-mm Traditional Buttress Screw (TBS), 3.5-mm rescue TBS and Bone screw fasteners (BSF) generated more compressive force than the original lag screws in both normal and osteoporotic surrogate bone. 2.7-mm rescue BSF provided similar compression as the original lag screw in normal bone, but not osteoporotic bone. Depending on bone quality, surgeons can use different rescue screws to obtain similar or more fracture compression and construct stability.

目的:“救援螺钉”用于解决骨折固定过程中螺钉脱落的问题。骨螺钉紧固件(BSF;骨中心技术(Osteocentric Technologies)有一种螺纹模式,可以提高购买量。本研究比较了传统支撑螺钉(TBS;Stryker)和BSF在救援/滞后模式下使用骨质疏松和正常骨合成模型。方法:将2.7 mm TBS螺钉以滞后方式放置,测量脱模前的最大压缩力。根据螺钉类型和直径的不同,通过先前剥离的延迟孔以延迟模式放置救援螺钉,在近端皮质中使用适当的滑动孔,并测量剥离前的最大压缩力。比较剥离后的2.7 mm TBS螺钉与各救援螺钉(3.5 mm TBS、2.7 mm BSF和3.5 mm BSF)的受力差异。试验在两种合成层状生物力学模型上进行,一种是合成20-10磅/立方英尺(PCF)骨质疏松模型,另一种是合成40-30磅/立方英尺正常骨密度模型。结果:2.7 mm救援BSF在正常骨中产生与原始2.7 mm TBS拉力螺钉相似的压力(BSF-501.0 N vs TBS-577.0 N, p=0.441),但在骨质疏松性骨中产生较低的压力(61.0 N vs 104.0 N, p=0.001)。3.5 mm TBS和BSF救援螺钉增加了骨质疏松性骨的压迫量(3.5 mm TBS vs 2.7 mm BSF: 136.0 N (16.4) vs 61.0 N (14.5);3.5mm BSF vs 2.7 mm BSF: 198.4 N (4.2) vs 61.0 N(14.5)结论:在剥离2.7 mm传统支撑螺钉(TBS)后,3.5mm救援TBS和骨螺钉紧固件(BSF)在正常和骨质疏松的替代骨中产生的压缩力比原始拉力螺钉大。2.7 mm救援BSF在正常骨中提供与原始拉力螺钉相似的压迫,但在骨质疏松的骨中没有。根据骨质量的不同,外科医生可以使用不同的救援螺钉来获得相似或更多的骨折压迫和构建稳定性。
{"title":"Maximum Compressive Forces of Rescue Screws with Varying Diameters and Thread Patterns in Synthetic Osteoporotic and Normal Bone Models.","authors":"Tyler Thorne, Makoa Mau, Lucas Marchand, Justin M Haller","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003018","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>\"Rescue screws\" are used to address screw stripping during fracture fixation. Bone screw fasteners (BSF; Osteocentric Technologies) have a thread pattern that may enhance purchase. This study compared maximum compressive forces of traditional buttress screws (TBS; Stryker) and BSF in rescue/lag modes using synthetic models of osteoporotic and normal bone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2.7-mm TBS screws were placed in lag mode and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Rescue screws, varied by screw type and diameter, were placed in lag mode through previously stripped lag holes, using appropriate glide holes in the proximal cortex and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Force differences were compared between the stripped 2.7-mm TBS screws, and each rescue screws (3.5-mm TBS, 2.7-mm BSF, and 3.5-mm BSF). Trials were conducted on two synthetic-layered biomechanical models, a synthetic 20-10 pound-per-cubic-foot (PCF) osteoporotic model and a 40-30 PCF normal bone density model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2.7-mm rescue BSF produced similar compression to the original 2.7-mm TBS lag screw (BSF-501.0 N vs TBS-577.0 N, p=0.441) in normal bone, but lower compression in osteoporotic bone (61.0 N vs 104.0 N, p=0.001). 3.5-mm TBS and BSF rescue screws increased the amount of compression in osteoporotic bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 136.0 N (16.4) vs 61.0 N (14.5); 3.5mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 198.4 N (4.2) vs 61.0 N (14.5) p<0.001) and in normal bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 968.0 N (30.3) vs 501.0 N (197.7); 3.5-mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 1136.0 N (51.2) vs 501.0 N (197.7) p<0.001) versus 2.7-mm rescue screws.3.5-mm rescue BSF produced more compression than 3.5-mm TBS (198.4 N (4.2) vs 136.0 N (16.3), p<0.001) in osteoporotic bone, but not in normal bone (1136.0 N (51.2) vs 968.0 N (30.3), p=0.106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After stripping of a 2.7-mm Traditional Buttress Screw (TBS), 3.5-mm rescue TBS and Bone screw fasteners (BSF) generated more compressive force than the original lag screws in both normal and osteoporotic surrogate bone. 2.7-mm rescue BSF provided similar compression as the original lag screw in normal bone, but not osteoporotic bone. Depending on bone quality, surgeons can use different rescue screws to obtain similar or more fracture compression and construct stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144159683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In Response: Timing, Dosing, and Ethical Concerns in the TXA Trial in Hip Fractures. 回应:髋部骨折中TXA试验的时间、剂量和伦理问题。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003017
Brandon J Yuan, Krystin A Hidden, William W Cross, Stephen A Sems
{"title":"In Response: Timing, Dosing, and Ethical Concerns in the TXA Trial in Hip Fractures.","authors":"Brandon J Yuan, Krystin A Hidden, William W Cross, Stephen A Sems","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144150725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Timing, Dosing, and Ethical Concerns in the TXA Trial in Hip Fractures. 髋部骨折TXA试验的时间、剂量和伦理问题。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003016
J Ambrose Martino, Richard J Friedman
{"title":"Timing, Dosing, and Ethical Concerns in the TXA Trial in Hip Fractures.","authors":"J Ambrose Martino, Richard J Friedman","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003016","DOIUrl":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144150727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sagittal Malalignment and Unsatisfactory Fracture Gap Reduction are Risk Factors for Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty After High-Energy Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures. 矢状位错位和骨折间隙缩小不理想是高能双髁胫骨平台骨折后转行全膝关节置换术的危险因素。
IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003015
Garrett Gordon, Sarah Kurkowski, Samuel Gerak, Nihar Shah, Michael Archdeacon, T Toan Le

Objectives: To assess the incidence of and risk factors for conversion to total knee arthroplasty after bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.

Methods: Design: Retrospective, prognostic study.

Setting: Tertiary-referral, single-center, Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: From 2008-2021, patients were included if they had an operative 41C1-C3 tibial plateau fractures and had ≥2 years of follow-up.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, injury mechanism, medical history, surgical details (meniscal repair, external fixation, time to fixation), and radiographic data (Kellgren-Lawrence grade, reduction quality (defined as gap <2 mm after reduction), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA)) were collected and compared between patients that went onto require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and those that did not.

Results: 243 patients were included with mean age of 49.7 (19-89) years and 58.8% were male. Mean follow-up was 5.2±2.6 years. 13.6% (33) required total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after an average of 23.4 months. TKA patients were older (54.0 vs. 49.0 years, p=0.042) and had larger fracture gaps (2.9 vs. 1.7 mm, p=0.024). They also had less satisfactory reductions in fracture gap (42.4% vs. 62.9% achieving reduction with a gap of <2mm, p=0.026) and PPTA (33.3% vs. 61.9%, p=0.002). Risk factors for TKA included fracture gap >2.45 mm after fixation, age >50.5, and PPTA >15°.

Conclusions: Sagittal malalignment, age, and poor fracture gap reduction increased the risk of TKA conversion after OTA41C1-C3 fracture fixation.

Level of evidence: III, prognostic.

目的:探讨胫骨双髁平台骨折后转全膝关节置换术的发生率及危险因素。方法:设计:回顾性、预后研究。环境:三级转诊,单中心,一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:从2008-2021年,纳入手术41C1-C3胫骨平台骨折且随访≥2年的患者。结果测量和比较:年龄、性别、BMI、吸烟状况、损伤机制、病史、手术细节(半月板修复、外固定、固定时间)、影像学资料(kelgren - lawrence分级、复位质量(定义为间隙))。结果:纳入243例患者,平均年龄49.7(19-89)岁,其中58.8%为男性。平均随访5.2±2.6年。13.6%(33)患者在平均23.4个月后需要全膝关节置换术(TKA)。TKA患者年龄较大(54.0比49.0岁,p=0.042),骨折间隙较大(2.9比1.7 mm, p=0.024)。他们的骨折间隙复位也不太令人满意(42.4%对62.9%),固定后骨折间隙复位为2.45 mm,年龄>为50.5,PPTA >为15°。结论:矢状位错位、年龄、骨折间隙复位不良增加了OTA41C1-C3骨折固定后TKA转换的风险。证据等级:III级,预示预后。
{"title":"Sagittal Malalignment and Unsatisfactory Fracture Gap Reduction are Risk Factors for Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty After High-Energy Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures.","authors":"Garrett Gordon, Sarah Kurkowski, Samuel Gerak, Nihar Shah, Michael Archdeacon, T Toan Le","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the incidence of and risk factors for conversion to total knee arthroplasty after bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective, prognostic study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary-referral, single-center, Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>From 2008-2021, patients were included if they had an operative 41C1-C3 tibial plateau fractures and had ≥2 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, injury mechanism, medical history, surgical details (meniscal repair, external fixation, time to fixation), and radiographic data (Kellgren-Lawrence grade, reduction quality (defined as gap <2 mm after reduction), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA)) were collected and compared between patients that went onto require total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and those that did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>243 patients were included with mean age of 49.7 (19-89) years and 58.8% were male. Mean follow-up was 5.2±2.6 years. 13.6% (33) required total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after an average of 23.4 months. TKA patients were older (54.0 vs. 49.0 years, p=0.042) and had larger fracture gaps (2.9 vs. 1.7 mm, p=0.024). They also had less satisfactory reductions in fracture gap (42.4% vs. 62.9% achieving reduction with a gap of <2mm, p=0.026) and PPTA (33.3% vs. 61.9%, p=0.002). Risk factors for TKA included fracture gap >2.45 mm after fixation, age >50.5, and PPTA >15°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sagittal malalignment, age, and poor fracture gap reduction increased the risk of TKA conversion after OTA41C1-C3 fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, prognostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144078541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1