Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma最新文献

Objectives: Determine adherence to a newly implemented protocol of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in geriatric hip fractures.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with a hip fracture treated with cephalomedullary nailing or hemiarthroplasty (CPT codes 27245 or 27236).

Outcome measures and comparisons: Adherence to a protocol for FICB, time intervals between emergency department arrival, FICB, and surgery stratified by time of admission.

Results: Three hundred eighty patients were studied (average age 78 years, 70% female). Approximately 53.2% of patients received an FICB, which was less than a predefined acceptable adherence rate of 75% ( P < 0.001). Approximately 5.0% received an FICB within 4 hours and 17.3% within 6 hours from admission. Admission during daylight hours (7 am -7p m ) when compared with evening hours (7 pm -7 am ) was associated with improved timeliness ([8.3% vs. 0% within 4 hours, P < 0.001] [27.5% vs. 2.4% within 6 hours, P < 0.001]). Improved adherence to the protocol was observed over time (odds ratio: 1.0013, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.0025, P = 0.0388).

Conclusions: FICB implementation was poor but gradually improved over time. Few patients received an FICB promptly, especially during night hours. Overall, this study demonstrates that implementation of an FICB program at a Level I academic trauma center can be difficult; however, many hurdles can be overcome with institutional support and dedication of resources such as staff, space, and additional training.

Objectives: To investigate the utility of postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans in identifying indications for revision surgery after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Urban level 1 trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures with surgical fixation (open reduction and internal fixation or percutaneous fixation) with routine postoperative CT scans.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Primary outcome-revision surgery based on postoperative imaging, including intra-articular osteochondral fragments, implant complications, and malreductions. Secondary outcome-quality of reduction on radiographs versus CT scans.

Results: One hundred forty-eight patients were included. The revision surgery rate was 15.5% (23/148); indications included malpositioned implants (6.7%, n = 10), malreductions (5.4%, n = 8), and intra-articular loose bodies (3.4%, n = 5). Only 8.7% (2/23) of the indications for revision surgery were identified on postoperative radiographs, with the remainder being identified on CT scans. Revision surgeries were found to be associated with male gender (proportional difference: 19.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4%-29.4%; P = 0.04) and T-type fractures (PD 28.7%; CI, 9.0%-48.9%; P = 0.001). Revision surgery was not found to be associated with age, body mass index, posterior wall fractures, concurrent pelvic ring fractures, or surgical approach. On radiographs, 51.3% (n = 76/148) had anatomic reductions (<2 mm) compared with only 10.2% (n = 15/148) on CT scans.

Conclusions: Indications for revision of acetabular fixation surgeries and poor reductions were frequently missed on plain radiography and identified on postoperative CT scans. This suggests that the use of advanced imaging such as intraoperative 3D imaging or postoperative CT scans may be beneficial.

Level of evidence: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: To compare acute outcomes between patients undergoing fix and replace (FaR) versus open-reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone in the treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Setting: Single Level 2 Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: Consecutive acetabular fracture patients ≥ 55 years of age treated by two orthopaedic trauma surgeons at one tertiary care center from January 2017 to April 2022 with FaR versus ORIF were identified. Included were those with complete datasets within the 180-day global period. Excluded were patients with previous ORIF of the acetabulum or femur, or revision total hip arthroplasty.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative weight-bearing status, postoperative disposition, time to postoperative mobilization, and 90-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes compared included demographic information, injury mechanism, surgical time, complications, revisions, and preoperative and postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS Jr.) scores. These were compared between FaR and ORIF groups.

Results: Seventeen FaR patients (average age 74.5 ± 9.0 years) and 11 ORIF patients (average age 69.4 ± 9.6 years) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range: 6-75.6 months). More FaR group patients were ordered immediate weight-bearing as tolerated or partial weight-bearing compared with ORIF alone (70% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.03). More patients in the FaR group had pre-existing hip osteoarthritis compared with ORIF alone (71% vs. 27%, P = 0.05). Fracture classification ( P = 0.03) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ( P = 0.02) differed between the 2 groups. There were no other differences in demographics, LOS ( P = 0.99), postoperative disposition ( P = 0.54), time to postoperative mobilization ( P = 0.38), 90-day readmission rates ( P = 0.51), operative time ( P = 0.06), radiographic union ( P = 0.35), time to union ( P = 0.63), pre- ( P = 0.32) or postoperative HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.80), delta HOOS Jr. scores ( P = 0.28), or reoperation rates between groups ( P = 0.15).

Conclusions: FaR and ORIF seem to be sound treatment options in the management of geriatric acetabular fractures. Patients in the FaR group achieved immediate or partial weight-bearing earlier than the ORIF group; however, time to postoperative mobilization did not differ between the two groups. The remainder of acute postoperative outcomes (LOS, postoperative disposition, and 90-day readmission rates) did not differ between the two groups.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: A novel protocol was previously presented for nonoperative management of Weber B (OTA/AO 44B) ankle fractures with criteria of medial clear space <7 mm on gravity stress (GS) radiographs and ipsilateral superior clear space and contralateral GS medial clear space within 2 mm. This study recruited an operative cohort for comparison of outcomes.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Level 1 academic center.

Patient selection criteria: The recruited operative cohort consisted of patients who may have been considered for the nonoperative protocol, but underwent surgery instead.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Kellgren-Lawrence scale for evaluation of arthritis, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot, Olerud Molander Ankle, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and PROMIS (physical function, depression, pain interference) scores for the current operative cohort were compared with that of the original nonoperative cohort.

Results: There were 20 patients in the operative cohort and 29 in the original nonoperative cohort. Mean follow-up was 6.9 and 6.7 years, respectively. The following outcome scores were better for the nonoperative cohort compared with the operative, respectively: LEFS, 75.2 and 68.1 ( P = 0.009); Olerud Molander Ankle, 94.1 and 89.0 ( P = 0.05); American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, 98.5 and 91.7 ( P = 0.0003); PROMIS Physical Function, 58.2 and 50.4 ( P = 0.01); PROMIS Pain Interference, 42.2 and 49.7 ( P = 0.004). The PROMIS Depression, 42.8 and 45.4 ( P = 0.29), was not different between groups. All patients achieved union of their fracture. Surgical complications included implant removal (15%), SPN neurapraxia (5%), and delayed wound healing (5%).

Conclusions: In carefully selected patients with isolated Weber B fractures, nonoperative management may be considered because it can lead to equivalent or superior outcomes with none of the risks typically associated with surgical intervention.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a significant difference existed in the rate of infection after ballistic traumatic arthrotomy managed operatively compared with those managed without surgery.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic Level I Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with ballistic traumatic arthrotomies of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, or ankle who received operative or nonoperative management.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The rates of infection and septic arthritis in those who received operative or nonoperative management.

Results: One hundred ninety-five patients were studied. Eighty patients were treated nonoperatively (Non-Op group), 16 patients were treated with formal irrigation and debridement in the operating room (I&D group), and 99 patients were treated with formal I&D and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (I&D + ORIF group). Patients in all 3 groups received local wound care and systemic antibiotics. No patients in the Non-Op or I&D group developed an infection. Six patients in the I&D + ORIF group developed extra-articular postoperative infections requiring additional interventions.

Conclusions: The infection rate in the I&D + ORIF group was consistent with the infection rates reported in orthopaedic literature after fixation alone. In addition, none of the infections were cases of septic arthritis. This suggests that traumatic arthrotomy does not increase the risk for infection beyond what is expected after fixation alone. Importantly, the Non-Op group represented a series of 80 patients who were treated nonoperatively without developing an infection, indicating that I&D may not be necessary to prevent infection after ballistic arthrotomy. The results suggest that septic arthritis after civilian ballistic arthrotomy is a rare complication regardless of the choice of treatment.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objective: To identify technical factors associated with nonunion after operative treatment with lateral locked plating.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Ten Level I trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: Adult patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures (OTA/AO type 33A or C) treated with lateral locked plating from 2010 through 2019.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Surgery for nonunion stratified by risk for nonunion.

Results: The cohort included 615 patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures. The median patient age was 61 years old (interquartile range: 46 -72years) and 375 (61%) were female. Observed were nonunion rates of 2% in a low risk of nonunion group (n = 129), 4% in a medium-risk group (n = 333), and 14% in a high-risk group (n = 153). Varus malreduction with an anatomic lateral distal femoral angle greater than 84 degrees, was associated with double the odds of nonunion compared to those without such varus [odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.2; P = 0.03]. Malreduction by medial translation of the articular block increased the odds of nonunion, with 30% increased odds per 4 mm of medial translation (95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = 0.03). Working length increased the odds of nonunion in the medium risk group, with an 18% increase in nonunion per 10-mm increase in working length (95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = 0.01). Increased proximal screw density was protective against nonunion (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92; P = 0.02) but yielded lower mRUST scores with each 0.1 increase in screw density associated with a 0.4-point lower mRUST (95% CI, -0.55 to -0.15; P < 0.001). Lateral plate length and type of plate material were not associated with nonunion. ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Malreduction is a surgeon-controlled variable associated with nonunion after lateral locked plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures. Longer working lengths were associated with nonunion, suggesting that bridge plating may be less likely to succeed for longer fractures.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: To determine change in stiffness and horizontal translation of a geriatric extra-articular proximal tibia fracture model after intramedullary nailing with distal (long)-segment blocking screws versus proximal (short)-segment blocking screws.

Methods: Unstable extra-articular proximal tibia fractures (OTA/AO 41-A3) were created in 12 geriatric cadaveric tibias. Intramedullary nails were locked with a standard construct (4 proximal screws and 2 distal screws). Specimens were then divided into 2 groups (6 matched pairs per group). Group 1 had a blocking screw placed lateral to the nail in the proximal segment (short segment). Group 2 had a blocking screw placed 1 cm distal to the fracture and medial to the nail (long segment). Specimens were then axially loaded and cycled to failure or cycle completion (50,000 cycles).

Results: Long-segment blocking screws significantly decreased the amount of horizontal translation at the fracture site compared with short-segment screws (0.77 vs. 2.0 mm, P = 0.039). They also resulted in a greater trend towards greater baseline stiffness, (807.32 ± 216.95 N/mm vs. 583.12 ± 130.1 N/mm, P = 0.072). There was no difference in stiffness after cyclic loading or survival through 50,000 cycles between the long-segment and short-segment groups.

Conclusion: Long-segment blocking screws added to an intramedullary nail construct resulted in decreased horizontal translation at the fracture site compared with short-segment screws in this model of a geriatric proximal tibia fracture.

Clinical relevance: Blocking screws are commonly used to aid in fracture alignment during intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. Even when not required to attain or maintain alignment, the addition of a blocking screw in either the proximal or the distal (long) segment may help mitigate the "Bell-Clapper Effect" in geriatric patients.

Objectives: There are multiple established patient positions for placement of a percutaneous retrograde posterior column screw for fixation of acetabulum fractures. The sciatic nerve is at risk of injury during this procedure because it lies adjacent to the start point at the ischial tuberosity. The purpose of this study was to define how the position of the sciatic nerve, relative to the ischial tuberosity, changes regarding the patient's hip position.

Methods: In a cohort of 11 healthy volunteers, ultrasound was used to measure the absolute distance between the ischial tuberosity and the sciatic nerve. Measurements were made with the hip and knee flexed to 90 degrees to simulate supine and lateral positioning and with the hip extended to simulate prone positioning. In both positions, the hip was kept in neutral abduction and neutral rotation.

Results: The distance from the lateral border of the ischial tuberosity to the medial border of the sciatic nerve was greater in all subjects in the hip-flexed position versus the extended position. The mean distance was 17 mm (range, 14-27 mm) in the hip-extended position and 39 mm (range, 26-56 mm) in the hip-flexed position ( P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The sciatic nerve demonstrates marked excursion away from the ischial tuberosity when the hip is flexed compared with when it is extended. The safest patient position for percutaneous placement of a retrograde posterior column screw is lateral or supine with the hip flexed to 90 degrees.

Objective: To identify patient, injury, and treatment factors associated with the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) after talar fractures, with particular interest in modifiable factors.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: 21 US trauma centers and 1 UK trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with talar neck and/or body fractures from 2008 through 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients who were at least 18 years of age with fractures of the talar neck or body and minimum 12 months follow-up or earlier diagnosis of AVN were included. Further exclusion criteria included non-operatively treated fractures, pathologic fractures, pantalar dislocations, and fractures treated with primary arthrodesis or primary amputation.

Outcome measurements and comparisons: The primary outcome measure was development of AVN. Infection, nonunion, and arthritis were secondary outcomes.

Results: In total, 798 patients (409 men; 389 women; age 18-81 years, average 38.6 years) with 798 (532 right; 264 left) fractures were included and were classified as Hawkins I (51), IIA (71), IIB (113), III (158), IV (40), neck plus body (177), and body (188). In total, 336 of 798 developed AVN (42%), more commonly after any neck fracture (47.0%) versus isolated body fracture (26.1%, P < 0.001). More severe Hawkins classification, combined neck and body fractures, body mass index, tobacco smoking, right-sided fractures, open fracture, dual anteromedial and anterolateral surgical approaches, and associated medial malleolus fracture were associated with AVN ( P < 0.05). After multivariate regression, fracture type, tobacco smoking, open fractures, dual approaches, age, and body mass index remained significant ( P < 0.05). Excluding late cases (>7 days), time to joint reduction for Hawkins type IIB-IV neck injuries was no different for those who developed AVN or not. AVN rates for reduction of dislocations within 6 hours of injury versus >6 hours were 48.8% and 57.5%, respectively. Complications included 60 (7.5%) infections and 70 (8.8%) nonunions.

Conclusions: Forty-two percent of all talar fracture patients developed AVN, with talar neck fractures, more displaced fractures, and open injuries having higher rates. Injury-related factors are most prognostic of AVN risk. Surgical technique to emphasize anatomic reduction, without iatrogenic damage to remaining blood supply appears to be prudent.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.