Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration最新文献

英文中文

Conclusions: Public Administration Under the Rule of Democratic Backsliders 结论:民主倒退者统治下的公共行政

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.013

J. Pierre, B. Peters, Michael W. Bauer, S. Becker, Kutsal Yesilkagit

引用次数: 1

Resilience Without Resistance: Public Administration Under Mutating Populisms in Office in Italy 没有抵抗的韧性:意大利执政中民粹主义变异下的公共行政

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.004

Fabrizio Di Mascio, A. Natalini, E. Ongaro

引用次数: 3

Public Administration in Poland in the Times of Populist Drift 民粹主义漂移时代的波兰公共行政

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.006

S. Mazur

引用次数: 1

Index 指数

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.015

引用次数: 0

“Doublespeak Populism” and Public Administration: The Case of Mexico “双重民粹主义”与公共行政:以墨西哥为例

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.009

Mauricio I. Dussauge-Laguna

引用次数: 6

Illiberal Transformation of Government Bureaucracy in a Fragile Democracy: The Case of Hungary 脆弱民主中政府官僚体制的不自由转型:匈牙利的案例

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.005

György Hajnal, Zsolt Boda

引用次数: 4

Working, Shirking, and Sabotage in Times of Democratic Backsliding: An Experimental Study in Brazil 民主倒退时期的工作、逃避与破坏:巴西的实验研究

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.011

João V. Guedes-Neto, B. Peters

引用次数: 6

Technocratic-Populist Mayors and Public Administration in Three European Cities 三个欧洲城市的技术官僚-民粹主义市长与公共管理

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.007

Eliška Drápalová

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Populists, Democratic Backsliding, and Public Administration 引言:民粹主义者、民主倒退与公共行政

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.002

M. Bauer, B. Peters, J. Pierre, Kutsal Yesilkagit, S. Becker, Peters Pierre Bauer, Yesilkagit Becker

Liberal democracy is at risk. Its ascent since the SecondWorldWar has recently come to a halt. Once considered to be the only political game in town, the fate of liberal democracy is growing more uncertain as actual and aspiring authoritarians have begun to undermine its hallmark institutions. Political pluralism, separation of powers, and rule of law are increasingly called into question. The “end of history,” implying the exhaustion of viable systematic alternatives to Western liberalism (Fukuyama 1989; 2006), has failed to come closer in recent years. Instead, liberal democracy is contested as it has not been since 1945. Two trends contribute to liberal democracy’s current stagnation. On the one hand, many authoritarian regimes – China above all, but also many Middle Eastern and African states – have not faltered, as modernization theories once predicted. Rather, they have proven resilient, even in the face of external and internal pressure. On the other hand, many democracies, both old and new, have seen authoritarian backlashes. While almost complete collapses of democracy, such as in Venezuela, remain exceptions, governments in countries such as Turkey, Hungary, and Poland have implemented far-reaching illiberal reforms – hollowing out their democratic institutions. Even the United States, one of the most robust liberal democracies, has witnessed authoritarian dynamics with President Trump. In many other Western states, too, liberal democracy is under siege, as authoritarianminded parties shift political discourses and thereby influence policies, or even enter government and implement illiberal reforms. Many of these current processes of liberal-democratic backsliding are driven by populism. A rather controversial term in political practice, populism can be understood as “a thin-centred ideology that

自由民主正处于危险之中。它自二战以来的上升势头最近已经停止。自由民主曾经被认为是唯一的政治游戏，但随着实际的和有抱负的威权主义者开始破坏其标志性制度，自由民主的命运正变得越来越不确定。政治多元化、三权分立和法治日益受到质疑。“历史的终结”，意味着对西方自由主义可行的系统替代方案的穷尽(Fukuyama 1989;2006年)，但近年来未能接近。相反，自由民主受到了自1945年以来从未有过的质疑。两种趋势导致了自由民主目前的停滞。一方面，许多专制政权——尤其是中国，但也包括许多中东和非洲国家——并没有像现代化理论曾经预测的那样动摇。相反，事实证明，即使面对外部和内部压力，它们也具有弹性。另一方面，许多民主国家，无论新旧，都出现了专制主义的反弹。尽管委内瑞拉等民主国家几乎完全崩溃的情况仍属例外，但土耳其、匈牙利和波兰等国的政府已经实施了影响深远的非自由主义改革——掏空了它们的民主制度。即使是最强大的自由民主国家之一的美国，也见证了特朗普总统的威权动态。在许多其他西方国家，自由民主也受到了围攻，因为专制的政党改变了政治话语，从而影响了政策，甚至进入政府并实施了不自由的改革。当前许多自由民主倒退的进程都是由民粹主义推动的。民粹主义在政治实践中是一个颇有争议的术语，可以理解为“一种以瘦为中心的意识形态

{"title":"Introduction: Populists, Democratic Backsliding, and Public Administration","authors":"M. Bauer, B. Peters, J. Pierre, Kutsal Yesilkagit, S. Becker, Peters Pierre Bauer, Yesilkagit Becker","doi":"10.1017/9781009023504.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504.002","url":null,"abstract":"Liberal democracy is at risk. Its ascent since the SecondWorldWar has recently come to a halt. Once considered to be the only political game in town, the fate of liberal democracy is growing more uncertain as actual and aspiring authoritarians have begun to undermine its hallmark institutions. Political pluralism, separation of powers, and rule of law are increasingly called into question. The “end of history,” implying the exhaustion of viable systematic alternatives to Western liberalism (Fukuyama 1989; 2006), has failed to come closer in recent years. Instead, liberal democracy is contested as it has not been since 1945. Two trends contribute to liberal democracy’s current stagnation. On the one hand, many authoritarian regimes – China above all, but also many Middle Eastern and African states – have not faltered, as modernization theories once predicted. Rather, they have proven resilient, even in the face of external and internal pressure. On the other hand, many democracies, both old and new, have seen authoritarian backlashes. While almost complete collapses of democracy, such as in Venezuela, remain exceptions, governments in countries such as Turkey, Hungary, and Poland have implemented far-reaching illiberal reforms – hollowing out their democratic institutions. Even the United States, one of the most robust liberal democracies, has witnessed authoritarian dynamics with President Trump. In many other Western states, too, liberal democracy is under siege, as authoritarianminded parties shift political discourses and thereby influence policies, or even enter government and implement illiberal reforms. Many of these current processes of liberal-democratic backsliding are driven by populism. A rather controversial term in political practice, populism can be understood as “a thin-centred ideology that","PeriodicalId":166815,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129707033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Incomplete Democratization, System Transformation, and the Civil Service: A Case Study on the Weimar Republic and the Nazi Regime in Germany 不完全民主化、制度转型与公务员制度:以魏玛共和国和德国纳粹政权为例

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781009023504.003

Bastian Strobel, Sylvia Veit

引用次数: 2

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀