首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews最新文献

英文 中文
Improving Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care via Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing: A Multi-PBRN Quality Improvement Project. 通过实践促进和学术详述提高初级保健中的癌症筛查率:多PBRN质量改进项目。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-10-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1855
Christopher P Morley, Laura A Schad, Laurene M Tumiel-Berhalter, Laura A Brady, Alexandrea Bentham, Karen Vitale, Amanda Norton, Gary Noronha, Carlos Swanger

Purpose: In the United States, cancer screening rates are often below national targets. This project implemented practice facilitation and academic detailing aimed at increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in safety-net primary care practices.

Methods: Three practice-based research networks across western and central New York State partnered to provide quality improvement strategies on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Pre/postintervention screening rates for all participating practices were collected annually, as were means across all practices over 7 years. Simple ordinary least squares linear regression was used to calculate the trend for each cancer type and test for statistical significance (ie, P≤0.05), using the ordinal time point as a fixed effect.

Results: An overall increase in mean screening rates was seen over the duration of this project for colorectal (24.6% preintervention to 48.0% in year 7 of intervention; P<0.001) and breast cancer (37.0% preintervention to 48.6% in year 7; P=0.460). Mean cervical cancer screening rates decreased (35.5% preintervention to 31.4% in year 7; P=0.209). Success in increasing screening rates varied across regions of New York State.

Conclusions: Practice facilitation and academic detailing were successful in significantly increasing, on average, colorectal cancer screening rate. Cervical cancer screening showed an overall decrease, likely due to difficulties for primary care practices in tracking and implementation, as many patients seek this service at outside gynecology facilities. Regional differences, guideline changes, and practice reorganization each may have played a part in observed trends. A standardization of queries being used to pull screening rates is an important step in increasing the reliability of these data.

目的:在美国,癌症筛查率往往低于国家目标。该项目实施了实践促进和学术细化,旨在提高安全网初级保健实践中的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率:方法:纽约州西部和中部的三个基于实践的研究网络合作提供乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的质量改进策略。每年收集所有参与实践的干预前/后筛查率,以及所有实践在 7 年内的平均值。使用简单的普通最小二乘法线性回归计算每种癌症类型的趋势,并检验统计显著性(即 P≤0.05 ),将序时点作为固定效应:结果:在项目实施期间,大肠癌的平均筛查率总体有所提高(干预前为 24.6%,干预后第 7 年为 48.0%;PC 结论:实践促进和学术细化工作取得了显著成效:实践促进和学术细化成功地大幅提高了平均结直肠癌筛查率。宫颈癌筛查率总体上有所下降,这可能是由于初级保健实践在跟踪和实施方面遇到了困难,因为许多患者是在外面的妇科机构寻求这项服务的。地区差异、指南变化和实践重组都可能对观察到的趋势起到一定作用。要提高这些数据的可靠性,必须对筛查率的查询进行标准化。
{"title":"Improving Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care via Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing: A Multi-PBRN Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Christopher P Morley, Laura A Schad, Laurene M Tumiel-Berhalter, Laura A Brady, Alexandrea Bentham, Karen Vitale, Amanda Norton, Gary Noronha, Carlos Swanger","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1855","DOIUrl":"10.17294/2330-0698.1855","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the United States, cancer screening rates are often below national targets. This project implemented practice facilitation and academic detailing aimed at increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in safety-net primary care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three practice-based research networks across western and central New York State partnered to provide quality improvement strategies on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Pre/postintervention screening rates for all participating practices were collected annually, as were means across all practices over 7 years. Simple ordinary least squares linear regression was used to calculate the trend for each cancer type and test for statistical significance (ie, P≤0.05), using the ordinal time point as a fixed effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall increase in mean screening rates was seen over the duration of this project for colorectal (24.6% preintervention to 48.0% in year 7 of intervention; P<0.001) and breast cancer (37.0% preintervention to 48.6% in year 7; P=0.460). Mean cervical cancer screening rates decreased (35.5% preintervention to 31.4% in year 7; P=0.209). Success in increasing screening rates varied across regions of New York State.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practice facilitation and academic detailing were successful in significantly increasing, on average, colorectal cancer screening rate. Cervical cancer screening showed an overall decrease, likely due to difficulties for primary care practices in tracking and implementation, as many patients seek this service at outside gynecology facilities. Regional differences, guideline changes, and practice reorganization each may have played a part in observed trends. A standardization of queries being used to pull screening rates is an important step in increasing the reliability of these data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8530242/pdf/jpcrr-8.4.315.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39580553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Objective Structured Clinical Examination Case for Opioid Management: Standardized Patient Ratings of Communication Skills as a Predictor of Systems-Based Practice Scores. 阿片类药物管理的客观结构化临床检查案例:沟通技巧的标准化患者评分作为基于系统的实践评分的预测因子。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1800
Heidi Kenaga, Tsveti Markova, R Brent Stansfield, Sarwan Kumar, Pierre Morris

The Wayne State University Office of Graduate Medical Education (WSUGME) uses an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess its programs' contribution to enhancing residents' communication skills. In response to revisions in Michigan's opioid-prescribing mandates in 2017, WSUGME developed a pain management case in collaboration with faculty and the Wayne State University School of Medicine to educate residents about these mandates while gauging their skills in Systems-Based Practice (SBP), an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Core Competency. This study examined whether resident OSCE performance predicted year-end milestones scores in SBP1 (coordinates patient care within various health care delivery settings), SBP2 (works in interdisciplinary teams to enhance patient safety and improve patient care quality), and SBP3 (practices and advocates for cost-effective, responsible care). Participants included two cohorts of first- (PRG-1) and second-year (PRG-2) residents in 6 programs: one cohort from academic year 2018-2019 (n=33), the other from 2019-2020 (n=37). Before the OSCE, WSUGME emailed residents the new state prescription requirements. During the simulated encounter, standardized patients rated residents on a validated communication instrument, and WSUGME conducted a linear regression of patient ratings on resident SBP milestone scores. The ratings of communication skills of PRG-1 residents did not predict any of the year-end SBP milestones. However, ratings of communication skills of PRG-2 residents predicted SBP1 and SBP2, though not SBP3, milestones. The OSCE opioid case proved to be a valid measure of PRG-2 residents' competence gained across the first year but was less meaningful when applied to PRG-1 residents.

韦恩州立大学研究生医学教育办公室(WSUGME)使用客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)来评估其项目对提高住院医生沟通技巧的贡献。为了响应2017年密歇根州阿片类药物处方规定的修订,WSUGME与教职员工和韦恩州立大学医学院合作开发了一个疼痛管理案例,以教育居民了解这些规定,同时衡量他们在基于系统的实践(SBP)中的技能,这是研究生医学教育核心竞争力认证委员会。本研究考察了驻地欧安组织的表现是否预测了SBP1(在各种医疗保健服务环境中协调患者护理)、SBP2(在跨学科团队中工作以加强患者安全和改善患者护理质量)和SBP3(实践和倡导具有成本效益的负责任护理)的年终里程碑得分。参与者包括6个项目的两组一年级(PRG-1)和二年级(PRG-2)居民:一组来自2018-2019学年(n=33),另一组来自2019-2020学年(n=37)。在欧安组织之前,WSUGME通过电子邮件向居民发送了新的州处方要求。在模拟会面期间,标准化的患者在经过验证的通信工具上对住院医生进行评分,WSUGME对住院医生的收缩压里程碑评分进行了患者评分的线性回归。PRG-1居民的沟通技巧评分并不能预测任何年终收缩压里程碑。然而,PRG-2居民的沟通技巧评分可以预测SBP1和SBP2,而不是SBP3的里程碑。欧安组织阿片类药物案例被证明是PRG-2居民在第一年获得的能力的有效衡量标准,但应用于PRG-1居民时意义不大。
{"title":"An Objective Structured Clinical Examination Case for Opioid Management: Standardized Patient Ratings of Communication Skills as a Predictor of Systems-Based Practice Scores.","authors":"Heidi Kenaga,&nbsp;Tsveti Markova,&nbsp;R Brent Stansfield,&nbsp;Sarwan Kumar,&nbsp;Pierre Morris","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1800","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Wayne State University Office of Graduate Medical Education (WSUGME) uses an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess its programs' contribution to enhancing residents' communication skills. In response to revisions in Michigan's opioid-prescribing mandates in 2017, WSUGME developed a pain management case in collaboration with faculty and the Wayne State University School of Medicine to educate residents about these mandates while gauging their skills in Systems-Based Practice (SBP), an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Core Competency. This study examined whether resident OSCE performance predicted year-end milestones scores in SBP1 (coordinates patient care within various health care delivery settings), SBP2 (works in interdisciplinary teams to enhance patient safety and improve patient care quality), and SBP3 (practices and advocates for cost-effective, responsible care). Participants included two cohorts of first- (PRG-1) and second-year (PRG-2) residents in 6 programs: one cohort from academic year 2018-2019 (n=33), the other from 2019-2020 (n=37). Before the OSCE, WSUGME emailed residents the new state prescription requirements. During the simulated encounter, standardized patients rated residents on a validated communication instrument, and WSUGME conducted a linear regression of patient ratings on resident SBP milestone scores. The ratings of communication skills of PRG-1 residents did not predict any of the year-end SBP milestones. However, ratings of communication skills of PRG-2 residents predicted SBP1 and SBP2, though not SBP3, milestones. The OSCE opioid case proved to be a valid measure of PRG-2 residents' competence gained across the first year but was less meaningful when applied to PRG-1 residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297494/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.261.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39254684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The Experience of OFF Periods in Parkinson's Disease: Descriptions, Triggers, and Alleviating Factors. 帕金森病患者OFF期的经历:描述、触发因素和缓解因素
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1836
Sneha Mantri, Madeline Lepore, Briana Edison, Margaret Daeschler, Catherine M Kopil, Connie Marras, Lana M Chahine

Purpose: Wearing off of Parkinson's disease medication is common, but triggers and coping strategies for this transient phenomenon are poorly understood. We aimed to assess the lived experience of OFF periods for people with Parkinson's disease.

Methods: Participants in the longitudinal Fox Insight study who endorsed OFF periods were invited to complete a survey consisting of both multiple-choice and free-text responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize multiple-choice responses, and free-text responses were classified into themes through iterative discussion by 3 movement disorders specialists.

Results: A total of 2110 participants (52.4% male) completed the survey. Tremor was the most common description of OFF periods (n=1038, 49.2%), followed by gait changes (n=535, 25.4%) and rigidity (n=430, 20.4%). Of 1498 specific triggers for OFF symptoms, the most common was stress (n=920, 61.4%), followed by anxiety/depression (n=476, 31.8%) and tiredness/fatigue (n=351, 23.4%). Common coping strategies (n=1416 responses) included exercise (n=678, 47.9%), taking a break (n=504, 35.6%), and meditation (n=276, 19.5%).

Conclusions: Although OFF periods are common, the individual experiences of OFF vary. This knowledge could be used to develop new counseling strategies for OFF periods in people with Parkinson's disease.

目的:帕金森氏症药物的药效逐渐消失是很常见的,但人们对这种短暂现象的诱因和应对策略知之甚少。我们的目的是评估帕金森病患者OFF期的生活经历。方法:在纵向Fox Insight研究中,支持OFF期的参与者被邀请完成一项包括多项选择和自由文本回答的调查。描述性统计用于总结多项选择回答,自由文本回答通过3名运动障碍专家的反复讨论分类为主题。结果:共2110人完成调查,其中男性占52.4%。震颤是OFF期最常见的描述(n=1038, 49.2%),其次是步态变化(n=535, 25.4%)和僵硬(n=430, 20.4%)。在诱发OFF症状的1498个特定诱因中,最常见的是压力(n=920, 61.4%),其次是焦虑/抑郁(n=476, 31.8%)和疲劳/疲劳(n= 3551, 23.4%)。常见的应对策略(n=1416)包括锻炼(n=678, 47.9%)、休息(n=504, 35.6%)和冥想(n=276, 19.5%)。结论:虽然OFF期是常见的,但OFF的个体经历是不同的。这一知识可用于为帕金森病患者的OFF期制定新的咨询策略。
{"title":"The Experience of OFF Periods in Parkinson's Disease: Descriptions, Triggers, and Alleviating Factors.","authors":"Sneha Mantri,&nbsp;Madeline Lepore,&nbsp;Briana Edison,&nbsp;Margaret Daeschler,&nbsp;Catherine M Kopil,&nbsp;Connie Marras,&nbsp;Lana M Chahine","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1836","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Wearing off of Parkinson's disease medication is common, but triggers and coping strategies for this transient phenomenon are poorly understood. We aimed to assess the lived experience of OFF periods for people with Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the longitudinal Fox Insight study who endorsed OFF periods were invited to complete a survey consisting of both multiple-choice and free-text responses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize multiple-choice responses, and free-text responses were classified into themes through iterative discussion by 3 movement disorders specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2110 participants (52.4% male) completed the survey. Tremor was the most common description of OFF periods (n=1038, 49.2%), followed by gait changes (n=535, 25.4%) and rigidity (n=430, 20.4%). Of 1498 specific triggers for OFF symptoms, the most common was stress (n=920, 61.4%), followed by anxiety/depression (n=476, 31.8%) and tiredness/fatigue (n=351, 23.4%). Common coping strategies (n=1416 responses) included exercise (n=678, 47.9%), taking a break (n=504, 35.6%), and meditation (n=276, 19.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although OFF periods are common, the individual experiences of OFF vary. This knowledge could be used to develop new counseling strategies for OFF periods in people with Parkinson's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297496/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.232.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39255229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Comprehensive Review and Update of Burning Eye Syndrome. 灼眼综合征的综合回顾与最新进展。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1813
Stephen Giacomazzi, Ivan Urits, Briggs Hoyt, Ashley Hubble, Elyse M Cornett, Kyle Gress, Karina Charipova, Amnon A Berger, Hisham Kassem, Alan D Kaye, Omar Viswanath

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca ("dry eye") is a common (14%-30% of adults over age 48) though difficult to treat condition that causes both discomfort and disability with associated dryness, pain, and visual disturbances. Etiology is not clearly understood but is likely varied, with a subset of patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain referred to as "burning eye syndrome." This review of existing literature summarizes the clinical presentation, natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities of burning eye syndrome. Chronicity of burning eye syndrome is likely secondary to increased nociception from the cornea, decrease in inhibitory signals, and nerve growth factor expression alterations. Treatment centers around symptomatic alleviation and reduction of inflammation. Conservative treatments focus on well-being and perception and include exercise, acupuncture, and cognitive behavioral therapy. Topical treatment consists of the anti-adhesion T-cell antagonist lifitegrast, corticosteroids, and cyclosporine; all have moderate efficacy and good safety. Autologous serum eye drops are a second-line topical that may promote corneal and neural healing on top of symptomatic relief. When these treatments fail, patients may trial neuromodulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Despite general treatment safety, more research is needed to develop novel approaches to this condition, possibly focusing more directly on the neurological component.

干燥性角膜结膜炎(“干眼”)是一种常见的疾病(占48岁以上成年人的14%-30%),但很难治疗,它会导致不适和残疾,并伴有干燥、疼痛和视力障碍。病因尚不清楚,但可能多种多样,其中一部分患者患有慢性神经性疼痛,称为“灼眼综合征”。本文综述了灼眼综合征的临床表现、自然史、病理生理及治疗方法。灼眼综合征的慢性可能继发于角膜伤害感觉增加、抑制信号减少和神经生长因子表达改变。治疗以症状缓解和减少炎症为中心。保守疗法侧重于健康和感知,包括运动、针灸和认知行为疗法。局部治疗包括抗黏附t细胞拮抗剂lifitgrast、皮质类固醇和环孢素;疗效中等,安全性好。自体血清滴眼液是在缓解症状的基础上促进角膜和神经愈合的二线外用药物。当这些治疗失败时,患者可以尝试经颅磁刺激的神经调节。尽管一般治疗是安全的,但需要更多的研究来开发治疗这种疾病的新方法,可能更直接地关注神经系统成分。
{"title":"Comprehensive Review and Update of Burning Eye Syndrome.","authors":"Stephen Giacomazzi,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Briggs Hoyt,&nbsp;Ashley Hubble,&nbsp;Elyse M Cornett,&nbsp;Kyle Gress,&nbsp;Karina Charipova,&nbsp;Amnon A Berger,&nbsp;Hisham Kassem,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (\"dry eye\") is a common (14%-30% of adults over age 48) though difficult to treat condition that causes both discomfort and disability with associated dryness, pain, and visual disturbances. Etiology is not clearly understood but is likely varied, with a subset of patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain referred to as \"burning eye syndrome.\" This review of existing literature summarizes the clinical presentation, natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities of burning eye syndrome. Chronicity of burning eye syndrome is likely secondary to increased nociception from the cornea, decrease in inhibitory signals, and nerve growth factor expression alterations. Treatment centers around symptomatic alleviation and reduction of inflammation. Conservative treatments focus on well-being and perception and include exercise, acupuncture, and cognitive behavioral therapy. Topical treatment consists of the anti-adhesion T-cell antagonist lifitegrast, corticosteroids, and cyclosporine; all have moderate efficacy and good safety. Autologous serum eye drops are a second-line topical that may promote corneal and neural healing on top of symptomatic relief. When these treatments fail, patients may trial neuromodulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Despite general treatment safety, more research is needed to develop novel approaches to this condition, possibly focusing more directly on the neurological component.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297487/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.255.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39255232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Business Cards as a Mechanism to Encourage Patient Feedback About Trainees. 名片作为一种机制来鼓励病人对学员的反馈。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1802
Marc Atzenhoefer, Jodie Ruffin, David Parewski, Nicole Deklotz, M Fuad Jan, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, Suhail Q Allaqaband

This project sought to evaluate if business card distribution improved the utility of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys by serving as a feedback mechanism for trainees. Between fall 2018 and spring 2019, patient encounters for 6 cardiovascular disease fellows were tracked over two 60-day periods. Six weeks were allowed for HCAHPS surveys to be returned. Business cards were subsequently deployed and encounters similarly tracked. During the control-group monitoring period, 721 patient encounters were logged and 80 (11.1%) surveys were returned. Qualitative feedback, in the form of free-response comments, was provided in 41 (51.3%) surveys. Business cards were then deployed and encounters similarly tracked. During the business card period, 508 patient encounters occurred and 97 (19.1%) surveys were returned. Qualitative feedback was provided in 52 (53.6%) surveys. No fellow-specific feedback was returned in either group. Business card use by trainees was associated with an improved rate of survey return, from 11.1% to 19.1%, but no effect on feedback to fellows or patient satisfaction scores was found. HCAHPS surveys were not useful in providing trainees with feedback. Immediate verbal feedback from patients via ancillary staff was observed. A method of relaying communication from patients to ancillary staff and medical education programs is needed.

本项目旨在评估名片的发放是否作为培训生的反馈机制,提高了医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估(HCAHPS)调查的效用。在2018年秋季至2019年春季期间,对6名心血管疾病研究员的患者遭遇进行了为期60天的跟踪研究。HCAHPS调查的返回时间为6周。随后,他们部署了名片,并对遭遇进行了类似的追踪。在对照组监测期间,记录了721例患者就诊,并返回了80份(11.1%)调查。在41项(51.3%)调查中,以自由回应评论的形式提供了定性反馈。然后使用名片,并以类似的方式跟踪会面情况。在名片使用期间,共接待508名患者,并返回97份(19.1%)问卷。有52项(53.6%)调查提供了定性反馈。两组都没有收到针对同伴的反馈。受培训者使用名片与调查回报率的提高有关,从11.1%提高到19.1%,但对同事的反馈或患者满意度得分没有影响。HCAHPS调查在向学员提供反馈方面没有作用。通过辅助人员观察到患者的即时口头反馈。需要一种将患者的信息传递给辅助人员和医学教育项目的方法。
{"title":"Business Cards as a Mechanism to Encourage Patient Feedback About Trainees.","authors":"Marc Atzenhoefer,&nbsp;Jodie Ruffin,&nbsp;David Parewski,&nbsp;Nicole Deklotz,&nbsp;M Fuad Jan,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Perez Moreno,&nbsp;Suhail Q Allaqaband","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project sought to evaluate if business card distribution improved the utility of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys by serving as a feedback mechanism for trainees. Between fall 2018 and spring 2019, patient encounters for 6 cardiovascular disease fellows were tracked over two 60-day periods. Six weeks were allowed for HCAHPS surveys to be returned. Business cards were subsequently deployed and encounters similarly tracked. During the control-group monitoring period, 721 patient encounters were logged and 80 (11.1%) surveys were returned. Qualitative feedback, in the form of free-response comments, was provided in 41 (51.3%) surveys. Business cards were then deployed and encounters similarly tracked. During the business card period, 508 patient encounters occurred and 97 (19.1%) surveys were returned. Qualitative feedback was provided in 52 (53.6%) surveys. No fellow-specific feedback was returned in either group. Business card use by trainees was associated with an improved rate of survey return, from 11.1% to 19.1%, but no effect on feedback to fellows or patient satisfaction scores was found. HCAHPS surveys were not useful in providing trainees with feedback. Immediate verbal feedback from patients via ancillary staff was observed. A method of relaying communication from patients to ancillary staff and medical education programs is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297493/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.267.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39254685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Incidental Finding of Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return of the Left Upper Lobe, a Rare Anatomical Variation. 偶然发现的异常肺静脉回流左上叶,一个罕见的解剖变异。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1809
Anika Dutta, Loren Zuiderveld

Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR) is a rare congenital abnormality in which 1 to 3 of the pulmonary veins connect to the right atrium rather than the left atrium. In this synthesis of the literature on PAPVR of the left upper lobe, we attempt to illustrate this clinical entity using a case detected incidentally on chest computed tomography, explain the anatomical aspects of this anomaly, and summarize the reported incidence and etiology of left-sided PAPVR. Lastly, differential diagnoses, clinical relevance, and management of left-sided PAPVR are presented. The identification of this variant is important, as it may have serious consequences.

部分肺静脉回流异常(PAPVR)是一种罕见的先天性异常,其中1至3条肺静脉连接右心房而不是左心房。在本文中,我们综合了关于左上叶PAPVR的文献,试图通过一个胸部计算机断层扫描偶然发现的病例来说明这一临床实体,解释这种异常的解剖学方面,并总结了报道的左侧PAPVR的发病率和病因。最后,鉴别诊断,临床相关性和管理的左侧PAPVR提出。这种变异的识别很重要,因为它可能会产生严重的后果。
{"title":"Incidental Finding of Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return of the Left Upper Lobe, a Rare Anatomical Variation.","authors":"Anika Dutta,&nbsp;Loren Zuiderveld","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1809","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR) is a rare congenital abnormality in which 1 to 3 of the pulmonary veins connect to the right atrium rather than the left atrium. In this synthesis of the literature on PAPVR of the left upper lobe, we attempt to illustrate this clinical entity using a case detected incidentally on chest computed tomography, explain the anatomical aspects of this anomaly, and summarize the reported incidence and etiology of left-sided PAPVR. Lastly, differential diagnoses, clinical relevance, and management of left-sided PAPVR are presented. The identification of this variant is important, as it may have serious consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297490/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.277.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39254687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Does Exercise Prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women? A Clin-IQ. 运动能预防孕妇妊娠期糖尿病吗?Clin-IQ。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1811
Olivia Lust, Tana Chongsuwat, Elizabeth Lanham, Ann F Chou, Elizabeth Wickersham

Excessive weight gain during pregnancy has been on the rise globally, leading to increased prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). A diagnosis of GDM often leads to pregnancy and infant-related complications. Regular exercise may have the potential to prevent GDM. However, evidence surrounding the utility of exercise during pregnancy as an effective risk reduction intervention has been mixed. This clinical inquiry examined the role of regular exercise during pregnancy in preventing GDM in both obese and normal-weight women and analyzed specific aspects of exercise that make it an effective preventive measure. The review of evidence included 3 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 1 umbrella review. Findings identified several components of an exercise program that can reduce GDM risk. Specifically, an exercise intervention of 40- to 60-minute sessions 3 times per week beginning as early as possible during pregnancy and continuing with good adherence over the course of pregnancy yielded clinically significant results. Adhering to a similar exercise routine before pregnancy also was shown to be protective against GDM for all women, but especially so for women who are overweight or obese.

妊娠期体重过度增加在全球范围内呈上升趋势,导致妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的患病率增加。GDM的诊断通常会导致妊娠和婴儿相关并发症。经常锻炼可能有预防GDM的潜力。然而,关于孕期运动作为一种有效的降低风险的干预措施的效用的证据却参差不齐。这项临床调查研究了怀孕期间定期运动在预防肥胖和正常体重妇女GDM中的作用,并分析了运动的具体方面,使其成为一种有效的预防措施。证据综述包括3项荟萃分析、3项系统综述和1项总括性综述。研究结果确定了锻炼计划的几个组成部分,可以降低GDM的风险。具体来说,每周进行3次,每次40- 60分钟的运动干预,在怀孕期间尽早开始,并在整个怀孕过程中坚持下去,产生了显著的临床效果。在怀孕前坚持类似的锻炼也被证明对所有女性都有预防GDM的作用,但对超重或肥胖的女性来说尤其如此。
{"title":"Does Exercise Prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women? A Clin-IQ.","authors":"Olivia Lust,&nbsp;Tana Chongsuwat,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lanham,&nbsp;Ann F Chou,&nbsp;Elizabeth Wickersham","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1811","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excessive weight gain during pregnancy has been on the rise globally, leading to increased prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). A diagnosis of GDM often leads to pregnancy and infant-related complications. Regular exercise may have the potential to prevent GDM. However, evidence surrounding the utility of exercise during pregnancy as an effective risk reduction intervention has been mixed. This clinical inquiry examined the role of regular exercise during pregnancy in preventing GDM in both obese and normal-weight women and analyzed specific aspects of exercise that make it an effective preventive measure. The review of evidence included 3 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 1 umbrella review. Findings identified several components of an exercise program that can reduce GDM risk. Specifically, an exercise intervention of 40- to 60-minute sessions 3 times per week beginning as early as possible during pregnancy and continuing with good adherence over the course of pregnancy yielded clinically significant results. Adhering to a similar exercise routine before pregnancy also was shown to be protective against GDM for all women, but especially so for women who are overweight or obese.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297497/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.281.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39254688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
COVID-19 Deliveries: Maternal Features and Neonatal Outcomes. COVID-19分娩:孕产妇特征和新生儿结局。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1848
Viviana Zlochiver, Blair Tilkens, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, Fatima Aziz, M Fuad Jan

Integrated, data-driven criteria are necessary to evaluate delivery outcomes in pregnancies affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzed maternal demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and delivery outcomes of 85 ethnically diverse, adult pregnant women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of delivery. Median maternal and gestational ages were 27 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 23-31) and 39 weeks (IQR: 37.3-40.0), respectively. Of the 85 SARS-CoV-2-positive participants, 67 (79%) had no COVID-19 symptoms at the time of routine COVID-19 admission testing, 14 (16%) reported mild COVID-19 symptoms, and 4 (5%) presented severe COVID-19 symptoms that required hospitalization. Patients in the severe COVID-19 group had significantly longer hospitalizations than those with nonsevere COVID-19 (7 [IQR: 4.5-9.5] vs 2 [IQR: 2-3] days; P<0.01). Neonatal outcomes included 100% live births with a median 1-minute Apgar score of 8 and 15% preterm births. No neonatal deaths or vertical transmissions were reported, and all neonatal intensive care unit admissions were related to prematurity. Overall, maternal symptom prevalence and peripartum complication rates were low, suggesting a generally good prognosis for pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infections at the time of delivery.

在持续的COVID-19大流行期间,需要综合的数据驱动标准来评估受严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)影响的妊娠的分娩结果。本研究分析了85名不同种族的成年孕妇的产妇人口统计学、临床特征、治疗和分娩结果,这些孕妇在分娩时检测出SARS-CoV-2阳性。中位产妇年龄和胎龄分别为27岁(四分位数间距[IQR]: 23-31)和39周(IQR: 37.3-40.0)。在85名sars - cov -2阳性参与者中,67人(79%)在常规COVID-19入院检测时没有COVID-19症状,14人(16%)报告了轻度COVID-19症状,4人(5%)出现了需要住院治疗的严重COVID-19症状。重症组患者的住院时间明显长于非重症组(7 [IQR: 4.5-9.5] vs 2 [IQR: 2-3]天;P
{"title":"COVID-19 Deliveries: Maternal Features and Neonatal Outcomes.","authors":"Viviana Zlochiver,&nbsp;Blair Tilkens,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Perez Moreno,&nbsp;Fatima Aziz,&nbsp;M Fuad Jan","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1848","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated, data-driven criteria are necessary to evaluate delivery outcomes in pregnancies affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzed maternal demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and delivery outcomes of 85 ethnically diverse, adult pregnant women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of delivery. Median maternal and gestational ages were 27 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 23-31) and 39 weeks (IQR: 37.3-40.0), respectively. Of the 85 SARS-CoV-2-positive participants, 67 (79%) had no COVID-19 symptoms at the time of routine COVID-19 admission testing, 14 (16%) reported mild COVID-19 symptoms, and 4 (5%) presented severe COVID-19 symptoms that required hospitalization. Patients in the severe COVID-19 group had significantly longer hospitalizations than those with nonsevere COVID-19 (7 [IQR: 4.5-9.5] vs 2 [IQR: 2-3] days; P<0.01). Neonatal outcomes included 100% live births with a median 1-minute Apgar score of 8 and 15% preterm births. No neonatal deaths or vertical transmissions were reported, and all neonatal intensive care unit admissions were related to prematurity. Overall, maternal symptom prevalence and peripartum complication rates were low, suggesting a generally good prognosis for pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infections at the time of delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297489/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.286.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39254689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Determining the Perception and Willingness of Primary Care Providers to Prescribe Advanced Diabetes Technologies. 决定初级保健提供者对先进糖尿病技术处方的认知和意愿。
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1819
Alexander O'Donovan, Sean M Oser, Jessica Parascando, Arthur Berg, Donald E Nease, Tamara K Oser

Advanced diabetes technologies have produced increasingly favorable outcomes compared to older treatments. Disparities in practice resources have led to a treatment disparity by clinical setting, where endocrinologists typically prescribe far more such technologies than primary care providers (PCPs). Fully automated artificial pancreas systems (APS), which combine technologies to deliver and adjust insulin dosing continuously in response to automatic and continuous glucose monitoring, may be more straightforward for PCPs to prescribe and manage, therefore extending their benefit to more patients. We aimed to assess willingness of PCPs to prescribe advanced diabetes technologies through a cross-sectional survey of PCPs from 4 geographically diverse centers. While respondents were uncomfortable initiating (63 of 72, 88%) or adjusting (64 of 72, 89%) traditional insulin pumps, their views on APS were quite different: 71 of 76 (93%) saw advantages to prescribing APS by PCPs rather than only endocrinologists. Most would consider prescribing APS for type 1 diabetes (58 of 76, 76%) and type 2 diabetes (52 of 76, 68%). No differences were seen among attendings, residents, or nurse practitioners. APS were much more acceptable than traditional insulin pumps among this primary care sample. If successful, primary care management of closed-loop APS would greatly increase access to such therapies and reduce disparities among those patients who face more difficulty accessing subspecialty care than they do primary care.

与旧的治疗方法相比,先进的糖尿病技术产生了越来越有利的结果。实践资源的差异导致了临床环境的治疗差异,内分泌学家通常比初级保健提供者(pcp)开出更多的此类技术。全自动人工胰腺系统(APS)结合了各种技术,可以根据自动和连续的血糖监测连续地输送和调整胰岛素剂量,对于pcp来说,这可能更容易处方和管理,从而使更多的患者受益。我们的目的是通过对来自4个地理位置不同中心的pcp进行横断面调查,评估pcp开具先进糖尿病技术的意愿。虽然受访者对启动(72,88%中的63人)或调整(72,89%中的64人)传统胰岛素泵感到不舒服,但他们对APS的看法却大不相同:76人中有71人(93%)认为由pcp而不是仅由内分泌学家开处方APS有好处。大多数人会考虑为1型糖尿病(76人中的58人,76%)和2型糖尿病(76人中的52人,68%)开APS。在主治医师、住院医师和执业护士之间没有发现差异。在这个初级保健样本中,APS比传统胰岛素泵更容易接受。如果成功的话,闭环APS的初级保健管理将大大增加此类治疗的可及性,并减少那些更难获得亚专科护理的患者之间的差异。
{"title":"Determining the Perception and Willingness of Primary Care Providers to Prescribe Advanced Diabetes Technologies.","authors":"Alexander O'Donovan,&nbsp;Sean M Oser,&nbsp;Jessica Parascando,&nbsp;Arthur Berg,&nbsp;Donald E Nease,&nbsp;Tamara K Oser","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced diabetes technologies have produced increasingly favorable outcomes compared to older treatments. Disparities in practice resources have led to a treatment disparity by clinical setting, where endocrinologists typically prescribe far more such technologies than primary care providers (PCPs). Fully automated artificial pancreas systems (APS), which combine technologies to deliver and adjust insulin dosing continuously in response to automatic and continuous glucose monitoring, may be more straightforward for PCPs to prescribe and manage, therefore extending their benefit to more patients. We aimed to assess willingness of PCPs to prescribe advanced diabetes technologies through a cross-sectional survey of PCPs from 4 geographically diverse centers. While respondents were uncomfortable initiating (63 of 72, 88%) or adjusting (64 of 72, 89%) traditional insulin pumps, their views on APS were quite different: 71 of 76 (93%) saw advantages to prescribing APS by PCPs rather than only endocrinologists. Most would consider prescribing APS for type 1 diabetes (58 of 76, 76%) and type 2 diabetes (52 of 76, 68%). No differences were seen among attendings, residents, or nurse practitioners. APS were much more acceptable than traditional insulin pumps among this primary care sample. If successful, primary care management of closed-loop APS would greatly increase access to such therapies and reduce disparities among those patients who face more difficulty accessing subspecialty care than they do primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297491/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.272.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39254686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient-Centered Language Use in Journals Publishing Research Focused on Heart Failure. 心衰期刊发表研究中以患者为中心的语言使用横断面分析
IF 1.7 Pub Date : 2021-07-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1821
Vivian Pham, Benjamin Greiner, Ryan Ottwell, Matt Vassar, Micah Hartwell

Purpose: Detrimental effects of using non-patient-centered language (nPCL) have been reported for diabetes, mental illness, and obesity, and both the American Medical Association (AMA) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommend using patient-centered language in medical literature. Heart failure is a common yet stigmatized disease, and nPCL may further propagate stigma. This study analyzed current use of nPCL in journals focused on heart failure research and also examined whether the journals steer authors to adhere to AMA or ICMJE guidelines regarding nPCL.

Methods: Following systematic search of PubMed for heart failure-related articles published from May 1, 2018, to April 30, 2020, cross-sectional analysis was performed. Each selected article was inspected for an array of nPCL terms and frequency of nPCL usage. Chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess relationships between study characteristics and nPCL use.

Results: Of the 195 articles fully analyzed, 108 (55.4%) contained a nPCL term, the most frequently used being "heart failure patient" (78.7%), "burden" (23.1%), and "suffer" (15.7%). Use of nPCL was disproportionately more common in original research articles (63.5%) and less common in case reports (18.2%). Articles that did not detail any treatment or intervention used the most nPCL (71.1%). No statistically significant association was found between a journal's impact factor and its adherence to AMA or ICMJE recommendations.

Conclusions: nPCL is widely used in publications reporting on heart failure. We encourage authors and journals to reduce nPCL to help decrease the stigma patients with this disease often encounter.

目的:使用非以患者为中心的语言(nPCL)对糖尿病、精神疾病和肥胖的有害影响已被报道,美国医学协会(AMA)和国际医学杂志编辑委员会(ICMJE)都建议在医学文献中使用以患者为中心的语言。心力衰竭是一种常见但被污名化的疾病,而nPCL可能进一步传播污名化。本研究分析了目前nPCL在心力衰竭研究期刊上的使用情况,并检查了这些期刊是否引导作者遵守AMA或ICMJE关于nPCL的指南。方法:系统检索PubMed 2018年5月1日至2020年4月30日发表的心力衰竭相关文章,进行横断面分析。每个选定的文章都检查了一系列nPCL术语和nPCL使用频率。采用卡方检验和多变量logistic回归来评估研究特征与nPCL使用之间的关系。结果:在195篇文献中,108篇(55.4%)包含nPCL术语,使用频率最高的是“心力衰竭患者”(78.7%)、“负担”(23.1%)和“受苦”(15.7%)。nPCL在原创研究文章中的使用比例更高(63.5%),在病例报告中的使用比例更低(18.2%)。没有详细说明任何治疗或干预措施的文章使用了最多的nPCL(71.1%)。期刊的影响因子与其对AMA或ICMJE建议的依从性之间没有统计学上的显著关联。结论:nPCL在心力衰竭的报道中被广泛使用。我们鼓励作者和期刊减少nPCL,以帮助减少患有这种疾病的患者经常遇到的耻辱。
{"title":"Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient-Centered Language Use in Journals Publishing Research Focused on Heart Failure.","authors":"Vivian Pham,&nbsp;Benjamin Greiner,&nbsp;Ryan Ottwell,&nbsp;Matt Vassar,&nbsp;Micah Hartwell","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Detrimental effects of using non-patient-centered language (nPCL) have been reported for diabetes, mental illness, and obesity, and both the American Medical Association (AMA) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommend using patient-centered language in medical literature. Heart failure is a common yet stigmatized disease, and nPCL may further propagate stigma. This study analyzed current use of nPCL in journals focused on heart failure research and also examined whether the journals steer authors to adhere to AMA or ICMJE guidelines regarding nPCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following systematic search of PubMed for heart failure-related articles published from May 1, 2018, to April 30, 2020, cross-sectional analysis was performed. Each selected article was inspected for an array of nPCL terms and frequency of nPCL usage. Chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess relationships between study characteristics and nPCL use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 195 articles fully analyzed, 108 (55.4%) contained a nPCL term, the most frequently used being \"heart failure patient\" (78.7%), \"burden\" (23.1%), and \"suffer\" (15.7%). Use of nPCL was disproportionately more common in original research articles (63.5%) and less common in case reports (18.2%). Articles that did not detail any treatment or intervention used the most nPCL (71.1%). No statistically significant association was found between a journal's impact factor and its adherence to AMA or ICMJE recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>nPCL is widely used in publications reporting on heart failure. We encourage authors and journals to reduce nPCL to help decrease the stigma patients with this disease often encounter.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297495/pdf/jpcrr-8.3.248.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39255231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1