Journal of Psychopharmacology最新文献

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) can present a variety of clinical presentations and has high inter-individual heterogeneity. Multiple studies have suggested various subtype models related to symptoms, etiology, sex, and treatment response. Employing different regimens is common when treating MDD, and identifying effective therapeutics requires time. Frequent treatment attempts and failures can lead to a diagnosis of treatment resistance, and the heterogeneity of treatment responses among individuals makes it difficult to understand and interpret the biological mechanisms underlying MDD.

Aim: This study explored the differentially expressed proteins and commonly altered protein networks across drug treatments by comparing the serum proteomes of patients with MDD treated with drug regimens (T-MDD, n = 20) and untreated patients (NT-MDD, n = 20).

Methods: Differentially expressed proteins were profiled in non-drug-treated and drug-treated patients with depression using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The common protein networks affected by different medications were studied.

Results: Of the proteins profiled, 12 were significantly differentially expressed between the T-MDD and NT-MDD groups. Commonly altered proteins and networks of various drug treatments for depression were related to the complement system and immunity.

Conclusions: Our results provide information on common biological changes across different pharmacological treatments employed for depression and provide an alternative perspective for improving our understanding of the biological mechanisms of drug response in MDD with great heterogeneity in the background of the disease.

Background: The 9-item Concise Health Risk Tracking - Self-Report (CHRT-SR₉) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure of suicidal risk. The goal of this article is to provide an evidence-based interpretation of the CHRT-SR₉ total score in terms of four clinically actionable categories of suicidal risk (none, mild, moderate, and severe).

Methods: Data from two large programs involving adolescents and adults were combined in this paper. In these studies, the CHRT-SR₉ was anchored against an independent measure of suicidal risk, the suicide item (Item #9) in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with categories 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). In the combined data (n = 1945), we calculated the cumulative percentage of data across these four categories and the percentile score of the CHRT-SR₉ total score that corresponded to these percentages; from this, we developed ranges of the CHRT-SR₉ total score that corresponded to the four categories of Item #9 of PHQ-9. We also calculated similar ranges for two broad subscales of the CHRT-SR₉ total score; Propensity and Suicidal Thoughts. To assess the robustness of our findings, we repeated the analysis at another timepoint across studies.

Results: Findings indicated that the CHRT-SR₉ total score (range: 0-36) can be categorized as none (0-14), mild (15-21), moderate (22-26), and severe (27-36). Similar categories were calculated for the Propensity and Suicidal Thoughts subscales. The findings were the same when repeated at another timepoint.

Conclusion: This categorization of the CHRT-SR₉ total score can place patients into clinically meaningful and actionable categories of suicidal risk.

Background: There are limited data regarding gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) allosteric modulator sleep-aid medications in persons with depression, insomnia, and suicidal ideation (SI).

Aims: This secondary analysis examined the relationship of age to insomnia and the impact of age on the treatment of insomnia with zolpidem extended-release (zolpidem-ER) in depressed suicidal patients. A prior report found that the addition of zolpidem-ER promoted significantly superior reductions in global severity of insomnia in depressed outpatients with insomnia and SI over 8 weeks, but here we report the differences among early, middle, and late insomnia.

Methods: This secondary analysis examined the three early, middle, and late insomnia items of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and their relationship to age and responsiveness to treatment with zolpidem-ER. One hundred and three patients with major depression, SI, and insomnia received open-label serotonin reuptake inhibitors and were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive zolpidem-ER or placebo at bedtime. Results: Older age at baseline was associated with worse middle and late insomnia, but not with early insomnia. Subsequent treatment with zolpidem-ER produced superior improvement in early and middle insomnia, but not late insomnia.

Conclusions: These findings are consistent with the known age-related advancement of sleep timing in the general population and depressed outpatients and with the expected effects of a short half-life GABA allosteric modulator sleep aid. By implication, prescribers of pharmacologic treatment of insomnia in depressed patients should consider an alternative to zolpidem-ER when late insomnia is a concern.Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01689909.

Background: Variable benefits have been reported from the adjunctive use of simvastatin and the 5HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron, in patients with schizophrenia. We investigated their independent efficacy and possible synergy to improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia within a single trial.

Methods: A 6-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 4-arm, 2 × 2 factorial design, in three centres in Pakistan. In total, 303 people with stable treated schizophrenia aged 18-65 were randomly allocated to add-on ondansetron, simvastatin, both or neither. The primary outcome was a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative score at 3 and 6 months.

Results: Mixed model analysis and analysis of covariance revealed no main effects of simvastatin or ondansetron but a significant negative interaction between them (p = 0.03); when given alone, both drugs significantly reduced negative symptoms compared to placebo but they were ineffective in combination. Individual treatment effects versus placebo were -1.9 points (95%CIs -3.23, -0.49; p = 0.01) for simvastatin and -1.6 points for ondansetron (95%CIs -3.00, -0.14; p = 0.03). Combined treatment significantly increased depression and side effects. In those with less than the median 5 years of treatment, ondansetron improved all PANSS subscales, global functioning measures and verbal learning and fluency, whereas simvastatin did not.

Conclusion: Small improvement in negative symptoms on simvastatin and ondansetron individually are not synergistic in combination in treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Ondansetron showed broad efficacy in patients on stable antipsychotic treatment within 5 years of illness. The findings suggest that ondansetron should be evaluated in patients at risk of psychosis or early in treatment.

Background: Anxiety and depression cause major detriment to the patient, family, and society - particularly in treatment-resistant (TR) cases, which are highly prevalent. TR prevalence may be due to current diagnoses being based not on biological measures but on symptom lists that suffer from clinical subjectivity, variation in symptom presentation, and comorbidity.

Aims: Goal-conflict-specific rhythmicity (GCSR) measured using the Stop-Signal Task (SST) may provide the first neural biomarker for an anxiety process and disorder. This GCSR has been validated with selective drugs for anxiety. So, we proposed that GCSR could differ between TR and non-TR individuals and do so differently between those diagnoses normally sensitive to selective anxiolytics and those not.

Methods: We recorded electroencephalograms (EEG) from 20 TR participants (4 GAD, 5 SAD and 11 MDD) and 24 non-TR participants (4 GAD, 5 SAD and 15 Comorbid GAD/MDD (GMD)) while they performed the SST.

Results: There was significant positive GCSR in all groups except the GAD-TR group. GAD-TR lacked GCSR in the low-frequency range. However, TR had little effect in SAD or MDD/GMD populations with apparent increases not decreases.

Conclusions: Overall, these results suggest that GAD may occur in two forms: one resulting from excessive GCSR and so being drug sensitive, and the other resulting from some other mechanism and so being TR. In SAD and MDD groups, heightened GCSR could be a consequence rather than the cause, driven by mechanisms that are normally more sensitive to non-selective panicolytic antidepressants.

Science on methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and MDMA-like substances is faced with the unique situation that this class of psychoactive agents is referred to with two basic names for its effects on the mind: empathogens and entactogens. Empathogen usually refers to the prosocial, empathetic, and openness properties of MDMA, while entactogen usually refers to the introspective and self-awareness properties of this substance. We review the origin and usage of the two terms, and also review recent findings that support that MDMA is an empathogen and an entactogen. Mostly no specified reasons can be detected whether research groups employ the term "entactogenic," "empathogenic," both, or neither, in their publications. A case is made that the use of two basic names for the effects on the mind for the same class of psychoactive substances is not warranted because a holistic principle underlies empathogenic and entactogenic properties of MDMA: an intense feeling of connection. Entactogenic characterizes being deeply connected to oneself, and empathogenic being deeply connected to others. We therefore suggest the name connectogen as the new basic name for the mind effects of MDMA and MDMA-like substances, a term having the connotation of producing a joining together/producing a connection. Thus, MDMA is basically a connectogen with at least the two major connective properties: entactogenic (intrapersonal) and empathogenic (interpersonal). Furthermore, first evidence shows that MDMA might also have further connectogenic properties such as a strong sense of connection with the here-and-now, the body, the world, and with spiritual principles. Finally, we compare connectogenic properties of MDMA with connectogenic properties of classic psychedelics, and lay out some future research in this regard.

Introduction: This study explores how individuals self-treat psychiatric conditions with psychedelics outside medical guidance bridging the gap in understanding unregulated therapeutic use.

Aims: The primary objective was to extract specific factors underlying the effects of psychedelics, exploring their relationship with the need for medication, particularly for mental health conditions like depression and anxiety. Additionally, we aimed to understand how the likelihood of being prescribed pharmacological medication varies based on mental health diagnoses and demographic factors.

Methods: This research utilised the Global Drug Survey 2020, an annual online survey focused on substance use patterns and demographics, incorporating modules addressing mental health and psychedelic use. The study employed Exploratory Factor Analysis to discern latent factors underlying the self-reported effects of psychedelics. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the association between identified factors and the likelihood of current prescribed medication usage.

Results: In all, 2552 respondents reported using psychedelics for self-treatment of mental health conditions. Three significant factors were identified: Improved Mental Health, Improved Self-Awareness and Neuro-Sensory Changes. The majority of the sample reported a history of depression (80%) or anxiety (65.6%), with a significant association observed between reported factors of psychedelics' effects and current medication usage for mental health, especially notable in cases of depression or comorbid depression and anxiety.

Conclusions: Perceived symptom improvement following psychedelic self-treatment may reduce the need for medically supervised pharmacological interventions. These findings highlight the potential of psychedelics to positively influence mental health and self-awareness, paving the way for further research into their therapeutic application.

Background: Voter initiatives in Oregon and Colorado authorize legal frameworks for supervised psilocybin services, but no measures monitor safety or outcomes.

Aims: To develop core measures of best practices.

Methods: A three-phase e-Delphi process recruited 36 experts with 5 or more years' experience facilitating psilocybin experiences in various contexts (e.g., ceremonial settings, indigenous practices, clinical trials), or other pertinent psilocybin expertise. Phase I, an on-line survey with qualitative, open-ended text responses, generated potential measures to assess processes, outcomes, and structure reflecting high quality psilocybin services. In Phase II, experts used seven-point Likert scales to rate the importance and feasibility of the Phase I measures. Measures were priority ranked. Qualitative interviews and analysis in Phase III refined top-rated measures.

Results: Experts (n = 36; 53% female; 71% white; 56% heterosexual) reported currently providing psilocybin services (64%) for a mean of 15.2 [SD 13.1] years, experience with indigenous psychedelic practices (67%), and/or conducting clinical trials (36%). Thematic analysis of Phase I responses yielded 55 candidate process measures (e.g., preparatory hours with client, total dose of psilocybin administered, documentation of touch/sexual boundaries), outcome measures (e.g., adverse events, well-being, anxiety/depression symptoms), and structure measures (e.g., facilitator training in trauma informed care, referral capacity for medical/psychiatric issues). In Phase II and III, experts prioritized a core set of 11 process, 11 outcome, and 17 structure measures that balanced importance and feasibility.

Conclusion: Service providers and policy makers should consider standardizing core measures developed in this study to monitor the safety, quality, and outcomes of community-based psilocybin services.

Background: Cannabis is the most widely used psychoactive drug in the United States. While multiple studies have associated acute cannabis consumption with alterations in cognitive function (e.g., visual and spatial attention), far less is known regarding the effects of chronic consumption on the neural dynamics supporting these cognitive functions.

Methods: We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) and an established visuospatial processing task to elicit multi-spectral neuronal responses in 44 regular cannabis users and 53 demographically matched non-user controls. To examine the effects of chronic cannabis use on the oscillatory dynamics underlying visuospatial processing, neural responses were imaged using a time-frequency resolved beamformer and compared across groups.

Results: Neuronal oscillations serving visuospatial processing were identified in the theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-14 Hz), and gamma range (56-76 Hz), and these were imaged and examined for group differences. Our key results indicated that users exhibited weaker theta oscillations in occipital and cerebellar regions and weaker gamma responses in the left temporal cortices compared to non-users. Lastly, alpha oscillations did not differ, but alpha connectivity among higher-order attention areas was weaker in cannabis users relative to non-users and correlated with performance.

Conclusions: Overall, these results suggest that chronic cannabis users have alterations in the oscillatory dynamics and neural connectivity serving visuospatial attention. Such alterations were observed across multiple cortical areas critical for higher-order processing and may reflect compensatory activity and/or the initial emergence of aberrant dynamics. Future work is needed to fully understand the implications of altered multispectral oscillations and neural connectivity in cannabis users.

Background: The recreational use of LSD, a synthetic psychedelic drug, has surged in recent years, coinciding with a renewed research focus on its potential psychotherapeutic properties.

Aim: This study aims to describe the experiences and perceptions of individuals engaging in LSD use for the first time, derived from a large international sample.

Methods: This study utilised 2018 Global Drug Survey data collected from 6 November 2017 to 10 January 2018. Participants who initiated LSD use in the preceding 12 months answered questions on their experiences, social settings, harm-reduction behaviours, and demographics. Descriptive statistics were employed, and characteristics of those seeking emergency medical treatment (EMT) and those not planning further LSD use were compared with other respondents.

Results: Among 3340 respondents who used LSD in the past year, their first-time experiences generally exceeded expectations, with 97.7% expressing excitement. Adverse and unwanted side effects were rarely reported, and only 17 individuals needed EMT. Feelings of fear were reported by most (64.1%), but only very mildly and not enough to put them off from wanting to use LSD again.

Discussion: Although the occurrence of unwanted side effects seems low and the LSD experience is generally pleasurable, vigilance amid the rising illicit use of LSD through harm-reduction education is still important in preventing possible risks.