JTO Clinical and Research Reports最新文献

Introduction

RET inhibitors with impressive overall response rates are now available for patients with NSCLC, yet the identification of RET fusions remains a difficult challenge. Most guidelines encourage the upfront use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), or alternatively, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) when NGS is not possible or available. Taken together, the suboptimal performance of single-analyte assays to detect RET fusions, although consistent with the notion of encouraging universal NGS, is currently widening some of the clinical practice gaps in the implementation of predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

This situation prompted us to evaluate several RET assays in a large multicenter cohort of RET fusion–positive NSCLC (n = 38) to obtain real-world data. In addition to RNA-based NGS (the criterion standard method), all positive specimens underwent break-apart RET FISH with two different assays and were also tested by an RT-PCR assay.

Results

The most common RET partners were KIF5B (78.9%), followed by CCDC6 (15.8%). The two RET NGS-positive but FISH-negative samples contained a KIF5B(15)-RET(12) fusion. The three RET fusions not identified with RT-PCR were AKAP13(35)-RET(12), KIF5B(24)-RET(9) and KIF5B(24)-RET(11). All three false-negative RT-PCR cases were FISH-positive, exhibited a typical break-apart pattern, and contained a very high number of positive tumor cells with both FISH assays. Signet ring cells, psammoma bodies, and pleomorphic features were frequently observed (in 34.2%, 39.5%, and 39.5% of tumors, respectively).

Conclusions

In-depth knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of the different RET testing methodologies could help clinical and molecular tumor boards implement and maintain sensible algorithms for the rapid and effective detection of RET fusions in patients with NSCLC. The likelihood of RET false-negative results with both FISH and RT-PCR reinforces the need for upfront NGS in patients with NSCLC.

Introduction

Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated (EGFRm+) NSCLC. Despite good BM-related outcomes of osimertinib, several patients still experience intracranial progression. A possible explanation is pharmacologic failure due to low plasma trough levels (C_min,SS) and consequently limited intracranial osimertinib exposure. We investigated the relation between osimertinib C_min,SS and BM development or progression.

Methods

A prospective multicenter cohort study, including patients receiving osimertinib for advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC. At osimertinib start, patients were allocated to the BM or no or unknown BM cohort and were further divided into subgroups based on osimertinib C_min,SS (low, middle, and high exposure). Cumulative incidence of BM progression or development and overall survival were determined for each group.

Results

A total of 173 patients were included, with 49 (28.3%) had baseline BM. Of these patients, 36.7% experienced BM progression, of which 16.7% in the low (<159.3 ng/mL), 40.0% in the middle, and 47.1% in the high (>270.7 ng/mL) C_min,SS subgroups. After 12 months, the cumulative incidence of BM progression for the BM cohort was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–49.0), 31% (95% CI:10.6–53.9), and 31% (95% CI:10.8–54.5) per C_min,SS subgroup, respectively. After 20 months, this was 20% (95% CI:2.6–49.0), 52% (95% CI:23.8–74.2), and 57% (95% CI:24.9–79.7), respectively. For the no or unknown BM cohort, 4.0% developed BM without differences within C_min,SS subgroups.

Conclusions

No relation was found between osimertinib C_min,SS and BM development or progression in patients with advanced EGFRm+ NSCLC. This suggests that systemic osimertinib exposure is not a surrogate marker for BM development or progression.

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–based treatment has become standard treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. We aimed to determine the survival benefit of upfront radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs) in patients with NSCLC who received ICI alone (ICI-alone) or with chemotherapy (ICI-chemo).

Methods

This study included consecutive patients with NSCLC having BMs who received ICI alone or ICI-chemo at 50 institutes between February 2017 and September 2021. The presence of BMs was confirmed by imaging before treatment. Treatment outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not receive upfront radiotherapy for BMs. Potential confounding factors were adjusted between the groups through inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis and overlap weighting (OW) analysis with propensity scores.

Results

Patients were grouped as ICI-alone cohort, 224 patients (upfront-radiotherapy group, 135 patients; no-radiotherapy group, 89 patients) and ICI-chemo cohort, 367 patients (upfront-radiotherapy group, 212 patients; no-radiotherapy group, 155 patients). In the ICI-alone cohort, the overall survival of the upfront-radiotherapy group was significantly longer than that of the no-radiotherapy group (IPTW-adjusted hazards ratio [HR] = 0.45 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29–0.72], OW-adjusted HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.35–0.77]). In contrast, in the ICI-chemo cohort, the OS of the upfront-radiotherapy group was not significantly different from that of the no-radiotherapy group (IPTW-adjusted HR = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.70–1.48], OW-adjusted HR = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.65–1.33]).

Conclusions

Upfront radiotherapy for BMs was associated with longer overall survival in patients with NSCLC who received ICI alone; however, it did not exhibit survival benefits in the patients who received ICI-chemo.

EGFR mutations are among the most common driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. Rare alterations, such as the EGFR-RAD51 fusion, respond to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors but can be missed by limited genomic sequencing panels. Here, we report a case of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in a never-smoker patient who initially did not have a targetable alteration identified on two different sequencing panels. The initial response to combination chemoimmunotherapy was short-lived. A rare EGFR-RAD51 fusion was then identified using a more in-depth sequencing panel. The patient experienced a dramatic and durable response to osimertinib. This case highlights the rarity of EGFR-RAD51 fusions, the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and the importance of a thorough search for targetable alterations in never-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma.

MET exon 14 skipping mutation has emerged as a new oncogenic driver in NSCLC with available targeted therapies, including Food and Drug Administration–approved inhibitors capmatinib and tepotinib. Potential resistance mechanisms are beginning to be described and include several on-target and off-target mutations. Here, we report an emergent secondary RET fusion in a patient with a primary MET exon 14 skipping mutation that progressed on capmatinib after the initial response. Subsequently, this patient received both a RET inhibitor (selpercatinib) followed by another MET-targeted treatment (tepotinib) without clinical benefit. Thereafter, cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor with activity against RET and MET was started with a rapid clinical and radiologic benefit.

Introduction

Stage III NSCLC is a heterogeneous disease, representing approximately one-third of newly diagnosed lung cancers. Brazil lacks detailed information regarding stage distribution, treatment patterns, survival, and prognostic variables in locally advanced NSCLC.

Methods

RELANCE/LACOG 0118 is an observational, retrospective cohort study assessing sociodemographic and clinical data of patients diagnosed with having stage III NSCLC from January 2015 to June 2019, regardless of treatment received. The study was conducted across 13 cancer centers in Brazil. Disease status and survival data were collected up to June 2021. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses, and a multivariable Cox regression model were performed. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

We recruited 403 patients with stage III NSCLC. Most were male (64.0%), White (31.5%), and smokers or former smokers (86.1%). Most patients had public health insurance (67.5%), had stage IIIA disease (63.2%), and were treated with concurrent chemoradiation (53.1%). The median follow-up time was 33.83 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.43–37.50). Median overall survival (OS) was 27.97 months (95% CI: 21.57–31.73), and median progression-free survival was 11.23 months (95% CI: 10.70–12.77). The type of treatment was independently associated with OS and progression-free survival, whereas the types of health insurance and histology were independent predictors of OS only.

Conclusions

Brazilian patients with stage III NSCLC with public health insurance are diagnosed later and have poorer OS. Nevertheless, patients with access to adequate treatment have outcomes similar to those reported in the pivotal trials. Health policy should be improved to make lung cancer diagnosis faster and guarantee prompt access to adequate treatment in Brazil.

Introduction

In Chinese patients with NSCLC, prevalence of EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) disease is high. In the global phase 3 ADAURA study (NCT02511106), adjuvant osimertinib was found to have a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo in resected stage IB to IIIA EGFRm NSCLC. We present efficacy and safety data from a subgroup analysis of 159 Chinese patients enrolled in the People’s Republic of China from ADAURA.

Methods

In ADAURA, patients with completely resected stage IB to IIIA EGFRm (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R) NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo for 3 years or until disease recurrence/discontinuation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was permitted before randomization, per physician/patient choice. Primary end point was investigator-assessed DFS in stage II to IIIA disease; secondary end points included DFS in stage IB to IIIA (overall population), overall survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety.

Results

Of 682 patients enrolled globally, 159 patients in the People’s Republic of China were included in this subgroup analysis (osimertinib n = 77; placebo n = 82). Baseline characteristics were balanced across the treatment arms. At data cutoff, stage II to IIIA DFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.42; maturity 59%); stage IB to IIIA DFS HR was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.17–0.48; maturity 42%). At 13% maturity (21 deaths), HR for overall survival in the stage IB to IIIA population was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.21–1.20). HRQoL was maintained from baseline, and safety was consistent with the global population.

Conclusions

In this population of Chinese patients from ADAURA, adjuvant osimertinib was found to have a clinically meaningful improvement in DFS versus placebo, with maintained HRQoL and a safety profile consistent with the global study population.

Introduction

Low-dose computed tomography screening (LDCT) and lung nodule programs (LNP) promote early lung cancer detection, improve survival; Multidisciplinary Care Programs (MDC) promote guideline-concordant care. The impact of such program-based care on “real-world” lung cancer survival is unquantified. We evaluated outcomes of lung cancer care delivered through structured programs in a community health care system.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study linking institutional prospective observational LDCT, LNP and MDC databases with Tumor Registry of Baptist Cancer Center facilities. We categorized all patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2011 and 2021 into program-based care versus non-program-based care cohorts. We compared patient characteristics, stage distribution, treatment modalities, survival and mortality in each pathway of care.

Results

Of 12,148 patients, 237, 1,165, 1,140 and 9,606 were diagnosed through the LDCT, LNP, MDC or no program, respectively; non-program-based care sequentially diminished from 96.3% to 66.5%, diagnosis through LDCT increased from 0.5% to 7.1%, LNP from 3.5% to 20.8%; and MDC alone decreased from a high of 12.8% in 2014 to 5.6% in 2021. Program-based care was associated with earlier stage (p < 0.001), higher surgical resection rates (p < 0.001), greater use of adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001), better aggregate and stage-stratified survival (p < 0.001), and lower all-cause and lung cancer-specific mortality (p < 0.001). Recipients of non-program-based care were considerably less likely to receive lung cancer treatment; results remained consistent when patients receiving no treatment were excluded.

Conclusions

Program-based care was associated with substantially better survival. Increasing access to program-based care should be explored as a matter of urgent public policy.

MET protooncogene (MET) alterations are known driver oncogenes in NSCLC. Since the identification of MET as a potential therapeutic target, extensive clinical trials have been performed. As a result, MET-targeted therapies, including MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and MET antibody–drug conjugates now play important roles in the standard treatment of MET-altered NSCLC; they have considerably improved the outcomes of patients with tumors that harbor MET oncogenic drivers. Although clinical agents are currently available and numerous other options are in development, particular challenges in the field require attention. For example, the therapeutic efficacy of each drug remains unsatisfactory, and concomitantly, the resistance mechanisms are not fully understood. Thus, there is an urgent need for optimal drug sequencing and combinations, along with a thorough understanding of treatment resistance. In this review, we describe the current landscape of pertinent clinical trials focusing on MET-targeted strategies and discuss future developmental directions in this rapidly expanding field.