Korean Journal of Anesthesiology最新文献

Background: Klinefelter syndrome (KS), usually the 47,XXY karyotype, is the most common sex chromosome anomaly in males. However, many cases remain undiagnosed because the clinical presentation is highly variable and physicians are not sufficiently trained to assess for this condition. To the best of our knowledge, only three detailed reports on anesthesia in patients with KS are currently available.

Case: We report the case of a 74-year-old male with KS who underwent ureterorenoscopy under general anesthesia. Despite the characteristic clinical presentation of KS and its typical sequelae, the course of anesthesia was unremarkable.

Conclusions: Despite the unremarkable anesthetic course in our case, anesthetists should be aware of the potential for a difficult airway and cardiovascular and other complications associated with this syndrome. During preoperative examination, attention should be paid to common secondary manifestations of KS to avoid perioperative complications.

Background: Distal nerve block approaches have been explored to reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) more effectively than interscalene block (ISB). However, these approaches are associated with a high incidence of HDP. The costoclavicular block (CCB) provides effective analgesia while reducing HDP. Here, we hypothesized that CCB would decrease the incidence of HDP compared to ISB while still providing effective pain relief after surgery.

Methods: Seventy patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided CCB (n = 35) or ISB (n = 35). Each group received 0.2% ropivacaine (20 ml CCB, 10 ml ISB). The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP, as measured using M-mode ultrasound. Diaphragmatic excursion, pulmonary function test results, opioid consumption, and pain scores were evaluated.

Results: Sixty-six patients were included. CCB group had a significantly lower incidence of HDP than those in the ISB group (5.9% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001). The diaphragmatic excursion reduction was significantly more in the ISB (3.87 cm) group than in the CCB (0.25 cm) group (P < 0.001). The decrease in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline was significantly greater in the ISB. There was no significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups during the entire postoperative period.

Conclusions: Compared with ISB, CCB significantly reduced the incidence of HDP while maintaining effective analgesia and causing less pulmonary function impairment. CCB may be a viable option for diaphragmatic-sparing analgesia after shoulder surgery.

Background: Although total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil is frequently used to optimize intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), the exact effect of remimazolam on IONM remains unknown. Here, we compared the effects of propofol and remimazolam along with remifentanil on IONM during TIVA.

Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 64 patients requiring IONM during cervical spine surgery were administered either propofol (Group P) or remimazolam (Group R). The preoperative latencies of the somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP; N20 for the median nerve and P37 for the tibial nerve) were measured. SEP latencies and amplitudes and motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured 30 min after anesthetic induction (T1), 30 min after surgical incision (T2), after laminectomy or discectomy (T3), immediately after plate insertion or pedicle screw fixation (T4), and before surgical wound closure (T5). The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the N20 latency changes measured at T1 and preoperatively.

Results: The change in SEP latencies including N20 and P37 at T1 compared with preoperative time was not significantly different between Groups P and R. Except for the amplitude of the right abductor brevis, there was no significant group-by-time interaction effect for intraoperative MEP amplitudes or SEP latencies and amplitudes.

Conclusions: TIVA with remimazolam and remifentanil for cervical spine surgery yielded stable IONM, comparable to those observed with conventional TIVA with propofol and remifentanil. Further clinical trials are needed in other surgical contexts and with more diverse patient populations to determine the effects of remimazolam on IONM.

Background: Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine that has recently been used for general anesthesia. This study compared the safety and efficacy of remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile agent-based anesthesia in adults undergoing general anesthesia.

Methods: We searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus for relevant studies. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced hypotension during surgery. Secondary outcomes included incidence of bradycardia, extubation time, duration in the post-anesthesia care unit hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV). We estimated the relative risk (RR) and mean difference with 95% CIs using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 969 patients from 12 randomized controlled trials were included. The incidence of hypotension was 14% and 34% in the remimazolam and volatile agent groups, respectively. Remimazolam significantly lowered the incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.43, 95% CI [0.29-0.63], P = 0.0000, I2 = 26%). The remimazolam group had a PONV incidence of 13%, compared to 28% in the volatile agent group, indicating a significant difference (RR: 0.51, 95% CI [0.37-0.72], P = 0.0001, I2 = 15%). No significant differences were observed in the other outcomes.

Conclusions: Remimazolam-based TIVA demonstrated favorable hemodynamic effects, with a lower incidence of hypotension and similar bradycardia rates, compared to volatile agent-based anesthesia. Furthermore, the reduction in PONV supports the use of remimazolam-based TIVA as a valuable method for general anesthesia.

Background: Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery.

Methods: Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil.

Results: Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group.

Conclusions: Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia strategies. This study evaluated the efficacy of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) in this context.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between April and December 2023 included 60 patients who underwent LSG. Patients were divided into the EOIB (30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine/side) and control (no block) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative intravenous (IV) morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 12-h MME consumption, pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil use, rescue analgesia requirements, time to first analgesic request, nausea/vomiting scores, antiemetic use, and American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Turkish Version (APS-POQ-R-TR) scores.

Results: The control group had significantly higher median opioid consumption than the EOIB group at 12 (14.4 vs. 5.8 mg; P < 0.001) and 24 h (25.9 vs. 10.6 mg; P < 0.001) postoperatively. The need for rescue analgesics did not differ significantly (43.3 vs. 23.3%: P = 0.1). The EOIB group exhibited significantly higher patient satisfaction (APS-POQ-R-TR score 2.91 vs. 4.42; P < 0.001) and consistently lower pain scores across all time points (P < 0.001) The EOIB group had lower nausea/vomiting scores (P < 0.001), fewer patients requiring antiemetics (16.7% vs. 40%; P = 0.045), longer time to first morphine request (57.5 vs. 25 min; P < 0.001), and lower remifentanil use (850 vs. 1050 μg; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The preoperative EOIB, as a part of multimodal analgesia, provides effective analgesia for acute pain in patients undergoing LSG.

Background: Regional anesthesia techniques that provide analgesia to the entire lateral abdomen are limited. We present a modified external oblique intercostal block for complete lateral abdominal analgesia with a single injection.

Case: We performed a modified version of the external oblique intercostal block unilaterally at the tenth rib along the mid-axillary line in three patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (two single injections, one catheter placement) and tested the technique on a cadaver with 20 ml of dye bilaterally. All patients reported good postoperative pain relief without complications and had consistent sensory coverage of the T8-T12 dermatomes from the anterior-to-posterior axillary line. Anatomical assessment confirmed consistent bilateral staining of the lateral cutaneous branches T8-T12.

Conclusions: The initial clinical success and anatomical findings of the modified approach to the external oblique intercostal block suggest that this technique may be an effective option for lateral abdominal analgesia.

Background: Emergence agitation (EA) occurs in preschool children after ophthalmic surgery as eye shields induce visual disturbance. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of light-transmitting eye shields as an alternative to traditional medical gauze eye shields for wound dressing in terms of EA incidence following strabismus surgery.

Methods: We randomly assigned 70 preschool children undergoing bilateral strabismus surgery to receive either light-transmitting (LT group, n = 35) or medical gauze (MG group, n = 35) eye shields upon the completion of surgery. The primary outcome was the difference in EA incidence between the groups.

Results: After adjusting the data for age and sex, children in the LT group were less likely to develop EA than those in the MG group (5 of 35 children [14.3%] vs 15 of 35 children [42.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 95% CI: 0.28, 0.08-0.94; P = 0.040). Compared with the MG group, a significant reduction in the median score of the peak Aono's four-point scale was observed in the LT group (P = 0.024; Benjamini-Hochberg [BH] critical value = 0.050). Additionally, the incidences of agitation (peak Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium score ≥ 16) and propofol administration in the LT group were significantly lower than those in the MG group (P = 0.022; BH critical value = 0.038 and P = 0.017; B-H critical value = 0.025, respectively).

Conclusions: The application of light-transmitting eye shields for wound dressing could help prevent EA after pediatric bilateral strabismus surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia.