Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-03DOI: 10.4097/kja.24537
Jeong-Jin Min, Eun Jung Oh, Hyun Ji Hwang, Sungwoo Jo, Hyunsung Cho, Chungsu Kim, Jong-Hwan Lee
Background: Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%.
Results: A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0-32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.
{"title":"Hypotension after induction of anesthesia with remimazolam or etomidate: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.","authors":"Jeong-Jin Min, Eun Jung Oh, Hyun Ji Hwang, Sungwoo Jo, Hyunsung Cho, Chungsu Kim, Jong-Hwan Lee","doi":"10.4097/kja.24537","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24537","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine known for its hemodynamic stability over propofol. However, its hemodynamic effects compared to those of etomidate are not well established. This study aimed to determine whether the use of remimazolam is non-inferior to etomidate with regard to the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (6 mg/kg/h) or the etomidate group (0.3 mg/kg) for induction of anesthesia. Anesthetic depth was adjusted based on the bispectral index. Primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg within 15 min after endotracheal intubation, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 patients were finally analyzed. Incidence of post-induction hypotension was 36/71 (50.7%) in the remimazolam group and 25/73 (34.2%) in the etomidate group, with a rate difference of 16.5% (95% CI [3.0-32.6]) between the two groups that was beyond the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12.0%. The number of patients who needed vasopressors was similar in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this non-inferiority trial, remimazolam failed to show non-inferiority to etomidate in terms of post-induction hypotension when used as an induction drug for general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, different doses or infusion techniques of remimazolam should be compared with etomidate in various patient groups to fully assess its hemodynamic non-inferiority during induction of anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-21DOI: 10.4097/kja.24569
Elif Sarikaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Yasemin B Ustun, Halil Cebeci, Burhan Dost
Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia strategies. This study evaluated the efficacy of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) in this context.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between April and December 2023 included 60 patients who underwent LSG. Patients were divided into the EOIB (30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine/side) and control (no block) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 12-h MME consumption, pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil use, rescue analgesia requirements, time to first analgesic request, nausea/vomiting scores, antiemetic use, and American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Turkish Version (APS-POQ-R-TR) scores.
Results: The control group had significantly higher median opioid consumption than the EOIB group at 12 (14.4 vs. 5.8 mg; P < 0.001) and 24 h (25.9 vs. 10.6 mg; P < 0.001) postoperatively. The need for rescue analgesics did not differ significantly (43.3 vs. 23.3%; P = 0.1). The EOIB group exhibited significantly higher patient satisfaction (APS-POQ-R-TR score 2.91 vs. 4.42; P < 0.001) and consistently lower pain scores across all time points (P < 0.001). The EOIB group had lower nausea/vomiting scores (P < 0.001), fewer patients requiring antiemetics (16.7% vs. 40%; P = 0.045), longer time to first morphine request (57.5 vs. 25 min; P < 0.001), and lower remifentanil use (850 vs. 1050 μg; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The preoperative EOIB, as a part of multimodal analgesia, provides effective analgesia for acute pain in patients undergoing LSG.
背景:腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)术后疼痛明显,需要有效的多模式镇痛策略。在这种情况下,本研究评估了外斜肋间阻滞(EOIB)的疗效。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲研究于2023年4月至12月进行,包括60例接受LSG治疗的患者。患者分为EOIB组(30 ml 0.25%布比卡因/侧)和对照组(无阻滞)。主要观察指标为术后24小时内静脉注射吗啡毫克当量(MME)的累积用量。次要结局包括12小时MME消耗、疼痛评分、术中瑞芬太尼使用、抢救镇痛要求、首次镇痛要求时间、恶心/呕吐评分、止吐药使用和美国疼痛学会患者结局问卷-修订土耳其版(APS-POQ-R-TR)评分。结果:对照组的阿片类药物消费中位数明显高于EOIB组(14.4 vs. 5.8 mg;P < 0.001)和24 h (25.9 vs 10.6 mg;P < 0.001)。对镇痛药物的需求无显著差异(43.3 vs. 23.3%: P = 0.1)。EOIB组表现出更高的患者满意度(APS-POQ-R-TR评分2.91比4.42;P < 0.001),所有时间点疼痛评分均较低(P < 0.001)。EOIB组恶心/呕吐评分较低(P < 0.001),需要止吐药的患者较少(16.7%对40%;P = 0.045),第一次请求吗啡所需时间较长(57.5 vs. 25 min;P < 0.001),瑞芬太尼用量较低(850比1050 μg;P < 0.001)。结论:术前EOIB作为多模式镇痛的一部分,可有效缓解LSG患者的急性疼痛。
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of the external oblique intercostal fascial plane block on postoperative acute pain in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Elif Sarikaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Yasemin B Ustun, Halil Cebeci, Burhan Dost","doi":"10.4097/kja.24569","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia strategies. This study evaluated the efficacy of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between April and December 2023 included 60 patients who underwent LSG. Patients were divided into the EOIB (30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine/side) and control (no block) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 12-h MME consumption, pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil use, rescue analgesia requirements, time to first analgesic request, nausea/vomiting scores, antiemetic use, and American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Turkish Version (APS-POQ-R-TR) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group had significantly higher median opioid consumption than the EOIB group at 12 (14.4 vs. 5.8 mg; P < 0.001) and 24 h (25.9 vs. 10.6 mg; P < 0.001) postoperatively. The need for rescue analgesics did not differ significantly (43.3 vs. 23.3%; P = 0.1). The EOIB group exhibited significantly higher patient satisfaction (APS-POQ-R-TR score 2.91 vs. 4.42; P < 0.001) and consistently lower pain scores across all time points (P < 0.001). The EOIB group had lower nausea/vomiting scores (P < 0.001), fewer patients requiring antiemetics (16.7% vs. 40%; P = 0.045), longer time to first morphine request (57.5 vs. 25 min; P < 0.001), and lower remifentanil use (850 vs. 1050 μg; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preoperative EOIB, as a part of multimodal analgesia, provides effective analgesia for acute pain in patients undergoing LSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"159-170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.4097/kja.24481
Kun Liu, Lin He
Background: Delirium in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) may be associated with worse outcomes in children with moyamoya disease (MMD). This retrospective study aimed to describe the prevalence of PACU delirium in children with MMD and investigate its risk factors.
Methods: Patients with MMD aged < 15 years who underwent indirect revascularization between January 2014 and October 2023 were included in this study. Delirium was assessed using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale. Potential risk factors for PACU delirium were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.
Results: PACU delirium occurred in 245 (33%) of the 750 hemispheric procedures performed in 522 patients. Delirium was associated with a higher incidence in patients undergoing the first revascularization (37%) than in those undergoing the second (25%; P = 0.002). Cerebral infarction as the initial presentation (odds ratio [OR]: 4.64, first revascularization), high pediatric moyamoya magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score (OR: 2.75, first revascularization; OR: 3.50, second revascularization), and high intraoperative mean arterial pressure variability (mmHg/min) (OR: 9.17, first revascularization; OR: 8.82, second revascularization) were associated with PACU delirium. Conversely, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was associated with a lower incidence of PACU delirium (OR: 0.46, first revascularization; OR: 0.25, second revascularization).
Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients with MMD developed delirium in the PACU. High intraoperative blood pressure variability and preoperative MRI lesions are independent risk factors for PACU delirium in children with MMD. TIVA may exert a protective effect against PACU delirium. Further studies are required to clarify the causality of these associations.
{"title":"Post-anesthesia care unit delirium in children with moyamoya disease undergoing indirect revascularization: incidence and risk factors.","authors":"Kun Liu, Lin He","doi":"10.4097/kja.24481","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) may be associated with worse outcomes in children with moyamoya disease (MMD). This retrospective study aimed to describe the prevalence of PACU delirium in children with MMD and investigate its risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with MMD aged < 15 years who underwent indirect revascularization between January 2014 and October 2023 were included in this study. Delirium was assessed using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale. Potential risk factors for PACU delirium were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PACU delirium occurred in 245 (33%) of the 750 hemispheric procedures performed in 522 patients. Delirium was associated with a higher incidence in patients undergoing the first revascularization (37%) than in those undergoing the second (25%; P = 0.002). Cerebral infarction as the initial presentation (odds ratio [OR]: 4.64, first revascularization), high pediatric moyamoya magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score (OR: 2.75, first revascularization; OR: 3.50, second revascularization), and high intraoperative mean arterial pressure variability (mmHg/min) (OR: 9.17, first revascularization; OR: 8.82, second revascularization) were associated with PACU delirium. Conversely, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was associated with a lower incidence of PACU delirium (OR: 0.46, first revascularization; OR: 0.25, second revascularization).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with MMD developed delirium in the PACU. High intraoperative blood pressure variability and preoperative MRI lesions are independent risk factors for PACU delirium in children with MMD. TIVA may exert a protective effect against PACU delirium. Further studies are required to clarify the causality of these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142864813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-03DOI: 10.4097/kja.24493
Ji-In Park, Hyo-Seok Na, Ji-Na Kim, Jung-Hee Ryu, Howon Jang, Hyun-Jung Shin
Background: Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine. This study compared the effects of remimazolam and propofol on cognitive function in adult patients after surgery or other procedures.
Methods: We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus, for relevant studies. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who experienced delirium or impaired cognitive function postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. We estimated the odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model.
Results: In total, 1295 patients from 11 randomized controlled trials were included. The incidence of postoperative delirium was 8.0% in the remimazolam group and 10.4% in the propofol group that was not significantly different (OR: 0.74, 95% CI [0.39-1.42], P = 0.369, I2 = 32%). More favorable cognitive function, as assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, was observed in the remimazolam group compared to the propofol group (MD: 1.06, 95% CI [0.32-1.80], P = 0.005, I2 = 89%). Remimazolam lowered the incidence of hypotension (OR: 0.28, 95% CI [0.21-0.37], P = 0.000, I2 = 0%) compared to propofol.
Conclusions: Remimazolam did not increase the risk of postoperative delirium and maintained cognitive function well, providing hemodynamic stability during surgery compared to propofol.
背景:雷马唑仑是一种新型短效苯二氮卓类药物。本研究比较了雷马唑仑和异丙酚对手术或其他手术后成人患者认知功能的影响。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Web of Science、SCOPUS等电子数据库进行相关研究。主要结局是术后经历谵妄或认知功能受损的参与者比例。次要结局包括低血压、心动过缓和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率。我们使用随机效应模型估计95% ci的优势比(OR)和平均差异(MD)。结果:共纳入11项随机对照试验(rct)的1295例患者。雷马唑仑组术后谵妄发生率为8.0%,异丙酚组为10.4%,差异无统计学意义(OR, 0.74;95% ci [0.39, 1.42];P = 0.3692;I²= 32%)。使用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评估,雷马唑仑组的认知功能优于异丙酚组(MD: 1.06, 95% CI [0.32, 1.80], P = 0.0050, I²= 89%)。与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑降低了低血压的发生率(OR: 0.28, 95% CI [0.21, 0.37], P = 0.0000, I²= 0%)。结论:与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑不会增加术后谵妄的风险,并能很好地维持认知功能,在手术期间提供血流动力学稳定性。
{"title":"Effect of remimazolam on postoperative delirium and cognitive function in adults undergoing general anesthesia or procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ji-In Park, Hyo-Seok Na, Ji-Na Kim, Jung-Hee Ryu, Howon Jang, Hyun-Jung Shin","doi":"10.4097/kja.24493","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24493","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine. This study compared the effects of remimazolam and propofol on cognitive function in adult patients after surgery or other procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus, for relevant studies. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who experienced delirium or impaired cognitive function postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. We estimated the odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1295 patients from 11 randomized controlled trials were included. The incidence of postoperative delirium was 8.0% in the remimazolam group and 10.4% in the propofol group that was not significantly different (OR: 0.74, 95% CI [0.39-1.42], P = 0.369, I2 = 32%). More favorable cognitive function, as assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, was observed in the remimazolam group compared to the propofol group (MD: 1.06, 95% CI [0.32-1.80], P = 0.005, I2 = 89%). Remimazolam lowered the incidence of hypotension (OR: 0.28, 95% CI [0.21-0.37], P = 0.000, I2 = 0%) compared to propofol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam did not increase the risk of postoperative delirium and maintained cognitive function well, providing hemodynamic stability during surgery compared to propofol.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"118-128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013991/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-08DOI: 10.4097/kja.24915
Balaji Vaithialingam
{"title":"Comment on \"Cardiac arrest due to coronary vasospasm after sugammadex administration -a case report-\".","authors":"Balaji Vaithialingam","doi":"10.4097/kja.24915","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24915","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"78 2","pages":"178-179"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.4097/kja.24687
Sung Hee Han, Kristen L Kiroff, Sakura Kinjo
The application of extended reality (XR) technology is rapidly expanding in the medical field, including anesthesia. This review aims to introduce the current literature on XR utilization to help anesthesiologists adopt this technology in education and clinical practice. XR is useful for both knowledge acquisition and skill training in a wide range of settings, from students to medical professionals. One of its major benefits is harm reduction through simulation scenarios that allow for immersion in clinical situations and opportunities to practice procedures and tasks. These scenarios often involve both technical and non-technical skills, enabling clinicians to enhance their capabilities without risking patient safety. In clinical settings, XR can also be used with patients to increase familiarity with medical procedures, provide education, and reduce anxiety. XR can also serve as a distraction technique, diverting the patient's attention from medical procedures and enhancing comfort, which may contribute to reduced opioid use. Although the potential benefits of XR in anesthesia have been reported in various educational and clinical contexts, challenges, such as limited financial reimbursement and restricted technical accessibility, remain. With further research and technological advancements, XR technology has the potential for widespread adoption in anesthesia practice.
{"title":"Extended reality in anesthesia: a narrative review.","authors":"Sung Hee Han, Kristen L Kiroff, Sakura Kinjo","doi":"10.4097/kja.24687","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24687","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The application of extended reality (XR) technology is rapidly expanding in the medical field, including anesthesia. This review aims to introduce the current literature on XR utilization to help anesthesiologists adopt this technology in education and clinical practice. XR is useful for both knowledge acquisition and skill training in a wide range of settings, from students to medical professionals. One of its major benefits is harm reduction through simulation scenarios that allow for immersion in clinical situations and opportunities to practice procedures and tasks. These scenarios often involve both technical and non-technical skills, enabling clinicians to enhance their capabilities without risking patient safety. In clinical settings, XR can also be used with patients to increase familiarity with medical procedures, provide education, and reduce anxiety. XR can also serve as a distraction technique, diverting the patient's attention from medical procedures and enhancing comfort, which may contribute to reduced opioid use. Although the potential benefits of XR in anesthesia have been reported in various educational and clinical contexts, challenges, such as limited financial reimbursement and restricted technical accessibility, remain. With further research and technological advancements, XR technology has the potential for widespread adoption in anesthesia practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"105-117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013993/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142983567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Regional anesthesia techniques that provide analgesia to the entire lateral abdomen are limited. We present a modified external oblique intercostal block for complete lateral abdominal analgesia with a single injection.
Case: We performed a modified version of the external oblique intercostal block unilaterally at the tenth rib along the mid-axillary line in three patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (two single injections, one catheter placement) and tested the technique on a cadaver with 20 ml of dye bilaterally. All patients reported good postoperative pain relief without complications and had consistent sensory coverage of the T8-T12 dermatomes from the anterior-to-posterior axillary line. Anatomical assessment confirmed consistent bilateral staining of the lateral cutaneous branches T8-T12.
Conclusions: Conclusions: The initial clinical success and anatomical findings of the modified approach to the external oblique intercostal block suggest that this technique may be an effective option for lateral abdominal analgesia.
{"title":"Modified approach to external oblique intercostal block: a proof-of-concept pilot case series and anatomical evaluation -a case series.","authors":"Takashi Fujino, Koichiro Ichimura, Hidaka Anetai, Izumi Kawagoe","doi":"10.4097/kja.24832","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional anesthesia techniques that provide analgesia to the entire lateral abdomen are limited. We present a modified external oblique intercostal block for complete lateral abdominal analgesia with a single injection.</p><p><strong>Case: </strong>We performed a modified version of the external oblique intercostal block unilaterally at the tenth rib along the mid-axillary line in three patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (two single injections, one catheter placement) and tested the technique on a cadaver with 20 ml of dye bilaterally. All patients reported good postoperative pain relief without complications and had consistent sensory coverage of the T8-T12 dermatomes from the anterior-to-posterior axillary line. Anatomical assessment confirmed consistent bilateral staining of the lateral cutaneous branches T8-T12.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conclusions: The initial clinical success and anatomical findings of the modified approach to the external oblique intercostal block suggest that this technique may be an effective option for lateral abdominal analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"171-176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013986/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-23DOI: 10.4097/kja.24538
Chang-Hoon Koo, Si Un Lee, Hyeong-Geun Kim, Soowon Lee, Yu Kyung Bae, Ah-Young Oh, Young-Tae Jeon, Jung-Hee Ryu
Background: Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery.
Methods: Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil.
Results: Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group.
Conclusions: Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.
背景:在脑血管搭桥手术中维持稳定的血压对预防脑缺血至关重要。我们比较了雷马唑仑麻醉与异丙酚诱导和地氟醚维持麻醉对脑血管搭桥手术患者术中血流动力学稳定性和血管活性药物需求的影响。方法:65例患者随机分为雷马唑仑组(31例,雷马唑仑为主静脉麻醉)和对照组(34例,异丙酚诱导和地氟醚维持麻醉)。主要观察指标为术中低血压的发生。次要结局包括低血压持续时间、最低平均血压(MBP)、MBP的广义平均实际变异性(ARV)以及苯肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素或瑞芬太尼的用量。结果:雷马唑仑组低血压发生率和持续时间显著低于对照组(38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005;0 [0,10] vs. 7.5[1.25, 25]分钟,P = 0.008)。Remimazolam在最低MBP(78[73, 84]比69.5 [66.25,75.8]mmHg, P < 0.001)和广义ARV(1.42±0.49比1.66±0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036)方面也显示出更好的结果。雷马唑仑组所需苯肾上腺素(20[0,65]比100 [60,130]μg, P < 0.001)、去甲肾上腺素(162[0,365.5]比1335 [998.5,1637.5]μg, P < 0.001)和瑞芬太尼(1750[1454.5,2184.5]比531 [431,746.5]μg, P < 0.001)低于对照组。结论:在脑血管搭桥手术中,雷马唑仑麻醉比异丙酚诱导和地氟醚维持麻醉提供更好的血流动力学稳定性。
{"title":"Effect of remimazolam on intraoperative hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Chang-Hoon Koo, Si Un Lee, Hyeong-Geun Kim, Soowon Lee, Yu Kyung Bae, Ah-Young Oh, Young-Tae Jeon, Jung-Hee Ryu","doi":"10.4097/kja.24538","DOIUrl":"10.4097/kja.24538","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintenance of stable blood pressure (BP) during cerebrovascular bypass surgery is crucial to prevent cerebral ischemia. We compared the effect of remimazolam anesthesia with that of propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and the need for vasoactive agents in patients undergoing cerebrovascular bypass surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-five patients were randomized into remimazolam (n = 31, remimazolam-based intravenous anesthesia) and control groups (n = 34, propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia). The primary outcome was the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension. The secondary outcomes included hypotension duration, lowest mean BP (MBP), generalized average real variability (ARV) of MBP, and consumption of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or remifentanil.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Occurrence rate and duration of hypotension were significantly lower in the remimazolam group (38.7% vs. 73.5%, P = 0.005; 0 [0, 10] vs. 7.5 [1.25, 25] min, P = 0.008). Remimazolam also showed better outcomes for lowest MBP (78 [73, 84] vs. 69.5 [66.25, 75.8] mmHg, P < 0.001) and generalized ARV of MBP (1.42 ± 0.49 vs. 1.66 ± 0.52 mmHg/min, P = 0.036). The remimazolam group required less phenylephrine (20 [0, 65] vs. 100 [60, 130] μg, P < 0.001), less norepinephrine (162 [0, 365.5] vs. 1335 [998.5, 1637.5] μg, P < 0.001), and more remifentanil (1750 [1454.5, 2184.5] vs. 531 [431, 746.5] μg, P < 0.001) than the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam anesthesia may provide better hemodynamic stability during cerebrovascular bypass surgery than propofol-induced and desflurane-maintained anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"148-158"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013992/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143023804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}