{"title":"Most countries under-price their carbon emissions","authors":"","doi":"10.1787/09a98dbb-en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1787/09a98dbb-en","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":178695,"journal":{"name":"Economic Policy Reforms","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124658562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ústavný súd Slovenskej republiky na neverejnom zasadnutí 23. septembra 2010 v senáte zloženom z predsedu Jána Lubyho, zo sudkyne Ľudmily Gajdošíkovej a sudcu Ladislava Orosza v konaní o sťažnosti Š. F., B., zastúpeného advokátom JUDr. P. D., B., ktorou namieta porušenie svojho základného práva na prerokovanie veci bez zbytočných prieťahov podľa čl. 48 ods. 2 Ústavy Slovenskej republiky postupom Okresného súdu Bratislava II v konaní vedenom pod sp. zn. 21 C 241/2007, za účasti Okresného súdu Bratislava II, takto
{"title":"Slovenská republika","authors":"EZ Nál","doi":"10.1787/9f6beefb-sk","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1787/9f6beefb-sk","url":null,"abstract":"Ústavný súd Slovenskej republiky na neverejnom zasadnutí 23. septembra 2010 v senáte zloženom z predsedu Jána Lubyho, zo sudkyne Ľudmily Gajdošíkovej a sudcu Ladislava Orosza v konaní o sťažnosti Š. F., B., zastúpeného advokátom JUDr. P. D., B., ktorou namieta porušenie svojho základného práva na prerokovanie veci bez zbytočných prieťahov podľa čl. 48 ods. 2 Ústavy Slovenskej republiky postupom Okresného súdu Bratislava II v konaní vedenom pod sp. zn. 21 C 241/2007, za účasti Okresného súdu Bratislava II, takto","PeriodicalId":178695,"journal":{"name":"Economic Policy Reforms","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122656450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-02-19DOI: 10.1787/sits-v2018-1-table19-en
Helga Amesberger, Luzenir Caixeta, E. Greif, Birgit Sauer
2.1. Organismos y estructuras Ministerio Federal para Asuntos Europeos e Internacionales (BMEIA) El Ministerio Federal para Asuntos Europeos e Internacionales (cuya sigla BMEIA corresponde en alemán a BundesMinisterium für Europäische und Internationale Angelegenheiten), es el punto focal para la cooperación con los gobiernos de los países en desarrollo y su función consiste en mantener la congruencia en el marco de la Cooperación Austríaca para el Desarrollo. En 2004, el BMEIA administró directamente el 6% de la AOD, pero luego de crearse la ADA en 2006 ese volumen se redujo al 2,95% (BMEIA, 2007).
2.1. 欧洲和国际事务部联邦机构和结构(BMEIA)联邦欧洲和国际事务(缩写BMEIA符合德国BundesMinisterium für Europäische und Internationale Angelegenheiten),震中是同发展中国家政府的合作和保持一致,其作用是奥地利发展合作框架内。2004年,BMEIA直接管理了6%的官方发展援助,但在2006年ADA成立后,这一比例下降到2.95% (BMEIA, 2007年)。
{"title":"Austria","authors":"Helga Amesberger, Luzenir Caixeta, E. Greif, Birgit Sauer","doi":"10.1787/sits-v2018-1-table19-en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1787/sits-v2018-1-table19-en","url":null,"abstract":"2.1. Organismos y estructuras Ministerio Federal para Asuntos Europeos e Internacionales (BMEIA) El Ministerio Federal para Asuntos Europeos e Internacionales (cuya sigla BMEIA corresponde en alemán a BundesMinisterium für Europäische und Internationale Angelegenheiten), es el punto focal para la cooperación con los gobiernos de los países en desarrollo y su función consiste en mantener la congruencia en el marco de la Cooperación Austríaca para el Desarrollo. En 2004, el BMEIA administró directamente el 6% de la AOD, pero luego de crearse la ADA en 2006 ese volumen se redujo al 2,95% (BMEIA, 2007).","PeriodicalId":178695,"journal":{"name":"Economic Policy Reforms","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127849057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Part I Rivalling realities: introduction obstacles to democratic consolidation. Part II The quest for solutions: constitutions and constitutionalism the justice model - human rights and social justice consociational models - power-sharing for stability. Part III Assessing the contenders: methodological critique - the validity of the models for South Africa normative acceptability practical feasibility. Part IV The "final" constitution: constitutional compromises dynamics of constitution-making and constitutionalism. Appendix
{"title":"South Africa","authors":"Siri Gloppen","doi":"10.4324/9780429052828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052828","url":null,"abstract":"Part I Rivalling realities: introduction obstacles to democratic consolidation. Part II The quest for solutions: constitutions and constitutionalism the justice model - human rights and social justice consociational models - power-sharing for stability. Part III Assessing the contenders: methodological critique - the validity of the models for South Africa normative acceptability practical feasibility. Part IV The \"final\" constitution: constitutional compromises dynamics of constitution-making and constitutionalism. Appendix","PeriodicalId":178695,"journal":{"name":"Economic Policy Reforms","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126075012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter examines health politics and the compulsory health insurance system in Lithuania and traces the development of its healthcare system. Since the country declared independence from the Soviet Union in 1990, Lithuanian health politics have revolved around restructuring and rationalizing the overcapacities of the inherited healthcare system, increasing levels of public finance to those sufficient to meet healthcare needs, and making good on the patient rights implied by a universal system. Despite those efforts, high out-of-pocket payments remain an obstacle to health solidarity, healthcare provision—which is predominantly public—is overly dependent on inpatient care, and public financing measured as a share of GDP remains low. As the chapter outlines, other issues include low levels of satisfaction with and trust in the health system and the persistence of informal payments to ensure quality care.
{"title":"Lithuania","authors":"L. Murauskienė","doi":"10.1787/548eaada-en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1787/548eaada-en","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines health politics and the compulsory health insurance system in Lithuania and traces the development of its healthcare system. Since the country declared independence from the Soviet Union in 1990, Lithuanian health politics have revolved around restructuring and rationalizing the overcapacities of the inherited healthcare system, increasing levels of public finance to those sufficient to meet healthcare needs, and making good on the patient rights implied by a universal system. Despite those efforts, high out-of-pocket payments remain an obstacle to health solidarity, healthcare provision—which is predominantly public—is overly dependent on inpatient care, and public financing measured as a share of GDP remains low. As the chapter outlines, other issues include low levels of satisfaction with and trust in the health system and the persistence of informal payments to ensure quality care.","PeriodicalId":178695,"journal":{"name":"Economic Policy Reforms","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126523072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}