Lancet Oncology最新文献

Background: Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is aberrantly expressed on the surface of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and neuroendocrine prostate cancer cells. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the DLL3-targeted imaging tracer [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 (composed of the anti-DLL3 antibody SC16.56 conjugated to p-SCN-Bn-deferoxamine [DFO] serving as a chelator for zirconium-89) in patients with neuroendocrine-derived cancer.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, first-in-human study of immunoPET-CT imaging with [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56. The study was done at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Patients aged 18 years or older with a histologically verified neuroendocrine-derived malignancy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. An initial cohort of patients with SCLC (cohort 1) received 37-74 MBq [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 as a single intravenous infusion at a total mass dose of 2·5 mg and had serial PET-CT scans at 1 h, day 1, day 3, and day 7 post-injection. The primary outcomes of phase 1 of the study (cohort 1) were to estimate terminal clearance half-time, determine whole organ time-integrated activity coefficients, and assess the safety of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56. An expansion cohort of additional patients (with SCLC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, atypical carcinoid tumours, and non-small-cell lung cancer; cohort 2) received a single infusion of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at the same activity and mass dose as in the initial cohort followed by a single PET-CT scan 3-6 days later. Retrospectively collected tumour biopsy samples were assessed for DLL3 by immunohistochemistry. The primary outcome of phase 2 of the study in cohort 2 was to determine the potential association between tumour uptake of the tracer and intratumoural DLL3 protein expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04199741.

Findings: Between Feb 11, 2020, and Jan 30, 2023, 12 (67%) men and six (33%) women were enrolled, with a median age of 64 years (range 23-81). Cohort 1 included three patients and cohort 2 included 15 additional patients. Imaging of the three patients with SCLC in cohort 1 showed strong tumour-specific uptake of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-SC16.56 at day 3 and day 7 post-injection. Serum clearance was biphasic with an estimated terminal clearance half-time of 119 h (SD 31). The highest mean absorbed dose was observed in the liver (1·83 mGy/MBq [SD 0·36]), and the mean effective dose was 0·49 mSv/MBq (SD 0·10). In cohort 2, a single immunoPET-CT scan on day 3-6 post-administration could delineate DLL3-avid tumours in 12 (80%) of 15 patients. Tumoural uptake varied between and within patients, and across anatomical sites, with a wide range in maximum standardised uptake value (from 3·3 to 66·7). Tumour uptake by [⁸⁹Zr

Background: Current guidelines recommend use of adjuvant imatinib therapy for many patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs); however, its optimal treatment duration is unknown and some patient groups do not benefit from the therapy. We aimed to apply state-of-the-art, interpretable artificial intelligence (ie, predictions or prescription logic that can be easily understood) methods on real-world data to establish which groups of patients with GISTs should receive adjuvant imatinib, its optimal treatment duration, and the benefits conferred by this therapy.

Methods: In this observational cohort study, we considered for inclusion all patients who underwent resection of primary, non-metastatic GISTs at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY, USA) between Oct 1, 1982, and Dec 31, 2017, and who were classified as intermediate or high risk according to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Miettinen criteria and had complete follow-up data with no missing entries. A counterfactual random forest model, which used predictors of recurrence (mitotic count, tumour size, and tumour site) and imatinib duration to infer the probability of recurrence at 7 years for a given patient under each duration of imatinib treatment, was trained in the MSKCC cohort. Optimal policy trees (OPTs), a state-of-the-art interpretable AI-based method, were used to read the counterfactual random forest model by training a decision tree with the counterfactual predictions. The OPT recommendations were externally validated in two cohorts of patients from Poland (the Polish Clinical GIST Registry), who underwent GIST resection between Dec 1, 1981, and Dec 31, 2011, and from Spain (the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas), who underwent resection between Oct 1, 1987, and Jan 30, 2011.

Findings: Among 1007 patients who underwent GIST surgery in MSKCC, 117 were included in the internal cohort; for the external cohorts, the Polish cohort comprised 363 patients and the Spanish cohort comprised 239 patients. The OPT did not recommend imatinib for patients with GISTs of gastric origin measuring less than 15·9 cm with a mitotic count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm² or for those with small GISTs (<5·4 cm) of any site with a count of less than 11·5 mitoses per 5 mm². In this cohort, the OPT cutoffs had a sensitivity of 92·7% (95% CI 82·4-98·0) and a specificity of 33·9% (22·3-47·0). The application of these cutoffs in the two external cohorts would have spared 38 (29%) of 131 patients in the Spanish cohort and 44 (35%) of 126 patients in the Polish cohort from unnecessary treatment with imatinib. Meanwhile, the risk of undertreating patients in these cohorts was minimal (sensitivity 95·4% [95% CI 89·5-98·5] in the Spanish cohort and 92·4% [88·3-95·4] in the Polish cohort). The OPT tested 33 different durations of imatinib treatment (<5 years) and found that 5

Background: Project Orbis is a global initiative that aims to streamline regulatory review processes across international regulators in the USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Israel, Brazil, Singapore, and Switzerland to bring promising cancer drugs to patients earlier. We explored the clinical benefit, time to regulatory approval and health technology assessment recommendations, reimbursement outcomes, and monthly treatment prices of cancer drugs reviewed through this initiative.

Methods: For this retrospective, comparative analysis, we identified cancer drug approvals reviewed through Project Orbis in the USA, Canada, and the UK between May 1, 2019, and Nov 1, 2023. Approvals of cancer drugs reviewed Project Orbis were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Centre of Excellence and all other FDA approvals from the Drugs@FDA database. The co-primary outcomes were time of regulatory review, time from regulatory approval to health technology assessment recommendation (England, Scotland, and Canada), reimbursement outcomes, clinical benefit (defined as median gains in progression-free survival and overall survival) between cancer drug approvals reviewed by Project Orbis and other FDA approval processes, and monthly treatment prices. The Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's Exact tests were used to examine statistical significance between approvals reviewed through Project Orbis and other FDA approvals during the same period.

Findings: Between May 1, 2019 and Nov 1, 2023, 81 (33%) of 244 cancer drugs approved by the FDA were reviewed through Project Orbis. The median overall survival gains were 4·1 months (IQR 3·3-5·1) compared with 2·7 months (2·1-3·9) for other FDA approvals. Similarly, progression-free survival gains were 2·6 months (IQR 1·7-4·9) for Project Orbis compared with 2·6 months (0·6-5·1) for other FDA approvals. Neither overall survival (p=0·11) nor progression-free survival (p=0·44) gains were significantly different between the two cohorts of approvals. Of the 14 UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approvals reviewed by the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the agency gave positive recommendations for all 14 (100%). Of the 15 MHRA approvals reviewed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the agency gave positive recommendations for six (40%). Of the 49 approvals reviewed by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), the agency conditionally recommended 44 (90%). The time between regulatory approval to NICE recommendation increased from a median of 137 days (IQR 102-172) in 2021 to 302 days (184-483) in 2023, SMC recommendation increased from 185 days (in 2021 for one drug only) to 368 days (IQR 313-476) in 2023, and CADTH decision increased from 97 days (in 2020 for one drug only) to 202 days (IQR 153-304) in 2023. The median monthly price of approvals reviewed through Project Orbi

In this Policy Review we discuss ten key pressure points in the NHS in the delivery of cancer care services that need to be urgently addressed by a comprehensive national cancer control plan. These pressure points cover areas such as increasing workforce capacity and its productivity, delivering effective cancer survivorship services, addressing variation in quality, fixing the reimbursement system for cancer care, and balancing of the cancer research agenda. These areas have been selected based on their relative importance to ensuring sustainable cancer services, persistence as key issues in the NHS, and their impact on delivering better and more equitable and affordable patient outcomes. Many of these pressure points are not acknowledged explicitly in any current discourse. The evidence we provide points to their impact on the ability to deliver world class cancer care, but also to their amenability to affordable solutions if given the relevant prioritisation and investment. The current narrative needs to move away from a technocentric approach to improving care, to one focused on understanding the complexity of cancer services and the wider health system to drive improvements in survival, quality of life, and experience for patients.