Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00028-0
Pushpa Narayanaswami, Donald B Sanders, Laine Thomas, Dylan Thibault, Jason Blevins, Rishi Desai, Andrew Krueger, Kathie Bibeau, Bo Liu, Jeffrey T Guptill
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction. Treatment typically includes symptomatic oral cholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppression, and immunomodulation. In addition to corticosteroids, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the most frequently used immunosuppressants in North America. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of these two drugs, and to assess the effect of the dose and duration of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a prospective cohort study at 19 academic centres in Canada and the USA. We included patients (aged ≥18 years) with autoimmune myasthenia gravis, who were never treated with immunosuppressants. Treating clinicians determined the choice of medication, dose, follow-up intervals, and drug monitoring. Outcome measures and adverse events were recorded at each visit. We assessed two co-primary outcomes. The first was the patient-reported Myasthenia Gravis-Quality of Life 15-revised (MGQOL-15r) score, measured as the mean change from treatment initiation to the follow-up visit with the lowest score. A clinically meaningful reduction (CMR) in MGQOL-15r was defined as a 5-point decrease. The second was a composite clinical outcome of disease improvement (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status Minimal Manifestations or better) and low adverse event burden (defined as grade ≤1 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). We also compared these outcomes in patients receiving an adequate dose and duration of azathioprine (≥2 mg/kg per day for at least 12 months) or mycophenolate mofetil (≥2 g per day for at least 8 months) and a lower dose or shorter duration of these agents. We used propensity score weighting with generalised linear regression models. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03490539).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 1, 2018, and Aug 31, 2020, 167 patients were enrolled; 85 did not receive azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and were excluded. Four were excluded from outcome analyses because they had scores of 0 on an outcome measure at treatment initiation. Of the 78 patients included in analyses, 47 received mycophenolate mofetil (median follow-up 25 months [IQR 13·5-31·5]) and 31 received azathioprine (median follow-up 20 months [IQR 13-30]). The mean change in MG-QOL15r was -10·4 (95% CI -18·9 to -1·3) with mycophenolate mofetil and -6·8 (-17·2 to 3·6) with azathioprine (mean difference -3·3, 95% CI -7·7 to 1·2; p=0·15). 38 (81%) of 47 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 18 (57%) of 31 receiving azathioprine had a CMR in MG-QOL15r (risk difference 24·0%; 95% CI -0·2 to 48·0; p=0·052). The clinical composite outcome was achieved in 22 (47·7%) of 47 patients who received mycophenolate mofetil and nine (28·1%) of 31 who received azathioprine (risk difference 19·6%, 95% CI -4·9 to 44·2; p=0·12). Descriptive analysis did not find a difference in the propor
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis (PROMISE-MG): a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Pushpa Narayanaswami, Donald B Sanders, Laine Thomas, Dylan Thibault, Jason Blevins, Rishi Desai, Andrew Krueger, Kathie Bibeau, Bo Liu, Jeffrey T Guptill","doi":"10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00028-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00028-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction. Treatment typically includes symptomatic oral cholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppression, and immunomodulation. In addition to corticosteroids, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the most frequently used immunosuppressants in North America. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of these two drugs, and to assess the effect of the dose and duration of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a prospective cohort study at 19 academic centres in Canada and the USA. We included patients (aged ≥18 years) with autoimmune myasthenia gravis, who were never treated with immunosuppressants. Treating clinicians determined the choice of medication, dose, follow-up intervals, and drug monitoring. Outcome measures and adverse events were recorded at each visit. We assessed two co-primary outcomes. The first was the patient-reported Myasthenia Gravis-Quality of Life 15-revised (MGQOL-15r) score, measured as the mean change from treatment initiation to the follow-up visit with the lowest score. A clinically meaningful reduction (CMR) in MGQOL-15r was defined as a 5-point decrease. The second was a composite clinical outcome of disease improvement (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status Minimal Manifestations or better) and low adverse event burden (defined as grade ≤1 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). We also compared these outcomes in patients receiving an adequate dose and duration of azathioprine (≥2 mg/kg per day for at least 12 months) or mycophenolate mofetil (≥2 g per day for at least 8 months) and a lower dose or shorter duration of these agents. We used propensity score weighting with generalised linear regression models. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03490539).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 1, 2018, and Aug 31, 2020, 167 patients were enrolled; 85 did not receive azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and were excluded. Four were excluded from outcome analyses because they had scores of 0 on an outcome measure at treatment initiation. Of the 78 patients included in analyses, 47 received mycophenolate mofetil (median follow-up 25 months [IQR 13·5-31·5]) and 31 received azathioprine (median follow-up 20 months [IQR 13-30]). The mean change in MG-QOL15r was -10·4 (95% CI -18·9 to -1·3) with mycophenolate mofetil and -6·8 (-17·2 to 3·6) with azathioprine (mean difference -3·3, 95% CI -7·7 to 1·2; p=0·15). 38 (81%) of 47 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 18 (57%) of 31 receiving azathioprine had a CMR in MG-QOL15r (risk difference 24·0%; 95% CI -0·2 to 48·0; p=0·052). The clinical composite outcome was achieved in 22 (47·7%) of 47 patients who received mycophenolate mofetil and nine (28·1%) of 31 who received azathioprine (risk difference 19·6%, 95% CI -4·9 to 44·2; p=0·12). Descriptive analysis did not find a difference in the propor","PeriodicalId":17989,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Neurology","volume":"23 3","pages":"267-276"},"PeriodicalIF":48.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139746854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00463-5
Amaia Muñoz-Lopetegi, Mar Guasp, Laia Prades, Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, Mireia Rosa-Justícia, Víctor Patricio, Thaís Armangué, Lorena Rami, Roger Borràs, Josefina Castro-Fornieles, Albert Compte, Carles Gaig, Joan Santamaria, Josep Dalmau
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder that can be treated with immunotherapy, but the symptoms that remain after treatment have not been well described. We aimed to characterise the clinical features of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis for 1 year starting within the first year after initial immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective cohort study, we recruited patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis as soon as possible after they had received conventional immunotherapy for initial symptoms; patients were recruited from 21 hospitals in Spain. Patients were excluded if they had an interval of more than 1 year since initial immunotherapy, had pre-existing neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders, or were unable to travel to Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain). Patients visited Hospital Clínic de Barcelona on three occasions-the first at study entry (visit 1), the second 6 months later (visit 2), and the third 12 months after the initial visit (visit 3). They underwent neuropsychiatric and videopolysomnography assessments at each visit. Healthy participants who were matched for age and sex and recruited from Hospital Clínic de Barcelona underwent the same investigations at study entry and at 12 months. Cross-sectional comparisons of clinical features between groups were done with conditional logistic regression, and binary logistic regression was used to assess associations between cognitive outcomes at 12 months and clinical features before initial immunotherapy and at study entry.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 42 participants agreed to be included in this study. 24 (57%) participants had anti-LGI1 encephalitis (mean age 63 years [SD 12]; 13 [54%] were female and 11 [46%] were male) and 18 (43%) were healthy individuals (mean age 62 years [10]; 11 [61%] were female and seven [39%] were male). At visit 1 (median 88 days [IQR 67-155] from initiation of immunotherapy), all 24 patients had one or more symptoms; 20 (83%) patients had cognitive deficits, 20 (83%) had psychiatric symptoms, 14 (58%) had insomnia, 12 (50%) had rapid eye movement (REM)-sleep behaviour disorder, nine (38%) had faciobrachial dystonic seizures, and seven (29%) had focal onset seizures. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures were unnoticed in four (17%) of 24 patients and focal onset seizures were unnoticed in five (21%) patients. At visit 1, videopolysomnography showed that 19 (79%) patients, but no healthy participants, had disrupted sleep structure (p=0·013); 15 (63%) patients and four (22%) healthy participants had excessive fragmentary myoclonus (p=0·039), and nine (38%) patients, but no healthy participants, had myokymic discharges (p=0·0051). These clinical and videopolysomnographic features led to additional immunotherapy in 15 (63%) of 24 patients, which resulted in improvement of these features in all 15 indivi
{"title":"Neurological, psychiatric, and sleep investigations after treatment of anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis in Spain: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Amaia Muñoz-Lopetegi, Mar Guasp, Laia Prades, Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, Mireia Rosa-Justícia, Víctor Patricio, Thaís Armangué, Lorena Rami, Roger Borràs, Josefina Castro-Fornieles, Albert Compte, Carles Gaig, Joan Santamaria, Josep Dalmau","doi":"10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00463-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00463-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder that can be treated with immunotherapy, but the symptoms that remain after treatment have not been well described. We aimed to characterise the clinical features of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis for 1 year starting within the first year after initial immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective cohort study, we recruited patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis as soon as possible after they had received conventional immunotherapy for initial symptoms; patients were recruited from 21 hospitals in Spain. Patients were excluded if they had an interval of more than 1 year since initial immunotherapy, had pre-existing neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders, or were unable to travel to Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain). Patients visited Hospital Clínic de Barcelona on three occasions-the first at study entry (visit 1), the second 6 months later (visit 2), and the third 12 months after the initial visit (visit 3). They underwent neuropsychiatric and videopolysomnography assessments at each visit. Healthy participants who were matched for age and sex and recruited from Hospital Clínic de Barcelona underwent the same investigations at study entry and at 12 months. Cross-sectional comparisons of clinical features between groups were done with conditional logistic regression, and binary logistic regression was used to assess associations between cognitive outcomes at 12 months and clinical features before initial immunotherapy and at study entry.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between May 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 42 participants agreed to be included in this study. 24 (57%) participants had anti-LGI1 encephalitis (mean age 63 years [SD 12]; 13 [54%] were female and 11 [46%] were male) and 18 (43%) were healthy individuals (mean age 62 years [10]; 11 [61%] were female and seven [39%] were male). At visit 1 (median 88 days [IQR 67-155] from initiation of immunotherapy), all 24 patients had one or more symptoms; 20 (83%) patients had cognitive deficits, 20 (83%) had psychiatric symptoms, 14 (58%) had insomnia, 12 (50%) had rapid eye movement (REM)-sleep behaviour disorder, nine (38%) had faciobrachial dystonic seizures, and seven (29%) had focal onset seizures. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures were unnoticed in four (17%) of 24 patients and focal onset seizures were unnoticed in five (21%) patients. At visit 1, videopolysomnography showed that 19 (79%) patients, but no healthy participants, had disrupted sleep structure (p=0·013); 15 (63%) patients and four (22%) healthy participants had excessive fragmentary myoclonus (p=0·039), and nine (38%) patients, but no healthy participants, had myokymic discharges (p=0·0051). These clinical and videopolysomnographic features led to additional immunotherapy in 15 (63%) of 24 patients, which resulted in improvement of these features in all 15 indivi","PeriodicalId":17989,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Neurology","volume":"23 3","pages":"256-266"},"PeriodicalIF":48.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139746867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00505-7
Joanna Laurson-Doube, Anne Helme, Francesco Nonino, Thomas Piggott, Nick Rijke, Deanna Saylor
{"title":"WHO considers multiple sclerosis treatments essential.","authors":"Joanna Laurson-Doube, Anne Helme, Francesco Nonino, Thomas Piggott, Nick Rijke, Deanna Saylor","doi":"10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00505-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00505-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17989,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Neurology","volume":"23 2","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":46.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139546856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：