Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy最新文献

Purpose: Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) is a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) subtype with a strong clinical association with smoking habits and a very low incidence in never-smokers. Molecular profiling of SCC in never-smokers could unveil tumor vulnerabilities and new treatment strategies.

Patients and methods: We considered a patient cohort of 17 former or current smokers (51.5%) and 16 never-smoker SCC patients (48.5%). TruSight Oncology^® 500, investigating hotspots in 523 cancer-related genes, Tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), and RNA sequencing was performed on tumor tissue. Genomic and transcriptomic profiles were compared between smokers and never-smoker patients.

Results: The most frequently altered genes were TP53 (67%), CDKN2A (20%) and PIK3CA (17%), with no substantial differences between groups, except for TP53 which was more frequently mutated in smokers (86.7% vs 46.7%, p = 0.05), who also showed a higher TMB with respect to non-smokers (median 11 mut/Mb vs 5.5 mut/Mb, p = 0.028); all patients were stable for MSI score (median 1.87 vs 1.82, p = 0.87). Activating mutations in EGFR and MET were found in one and two never-smokers, respectively. Three smoker patients had simultaneous amplifications in FGF3, FGF19 and FGF4. Enrichment analyses showed that cyclin-dependent protein Ser/Thr kinase activity and PI3K signaling pathways were affected in both groups, while cellular damage response was exclusively altered in never-smokers. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering on transcriptomes effectively identified different specific transcriptional subtypes between smokers and never-smokers. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted that tumors from never-smokers are characterized by dysregulation in cell membrane potential and ion homeostasis across cell membrane pathways.

Conclusion: Genomic and transcriptomic profiles deeply differentiate SCC occurring in never-smokers with respect to SCC in smoker patients. Moreover, SCC could carry canonical NSCLC) activating mutations. Our data suggest that deep molecular analyses resolve tumor heterogeneity and may help with new algorithm-based treatment strategies for SCC.

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) represents a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and it has poor pathologic differentiation, aggressive progression, and early metastasis. Conventional antitumor therapies demonstrate limited efficacy against PSC, which is frequently associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, single-arm Phase II trial. This study has been registered with Clinical Trials (ChiCTR2000031478). Patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination with chemotherapy, the treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary endpoints comprising progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events.

Results: From March 2021 through August 2023, a total of 38 patients were enrolled. The study comprised predominantly male participants (91%, n=34) with a median age of 65.4 years. Notably, 86.8% (n=33) had smoking histories. The ORR and DCR were 73.7% and 94.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.7) and median OS was not reached. The most common immune-related adverse events were pneumonitis, the incidence of which was 13.2%. The majority of observed AEs were grades 1 or 2 and all AEs were manageable. Only two patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3 immune-related pneumonitis during the study.

Conclusion: In our trial, we found that ICI combination with chemotherapy showed robust efficacy alongside acceptable toxicity in advanced-stage PSC. Taken together, ICI combination with chemotherapy could be a better option for PSC.

Introduction: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive tumor initiation, relapse, and metastasis. Our research team developed polycaprolactone electrospun (PCL-ES) scaffolds for enriching lung CSCs (LCSCs) since monolayer culture do not allow the study of this malignant population. The upregulation of fatty acid synthase (FASN) correlates with resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and its inhibition induces cytotoxicity in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the role of FASN and related signaling pathways in LCSCs cultured in PCL-ES scaffolds and to evaluate the effectiveness of FASN inhibitor G28, a synthetic derivative of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), against this population.

Methods: EGFR-TKI-sensitive and -resistant cell modes were used. FASN expression and function were studied by RT-qPCR, Western blotting, and free fatty acid quantification, while related signaling pathways (EGFR, MAPK, AKT, and STAT3) were examined by Western blotting. The effects of G28 on LCSCs -including its impact on FASN and related signaling-were evaluated using the MTT assay and Western blotting.

Results: LCSCs cultured in PCL-ES scaffolds showed a significant FASN upregulation, supporting their proliferation and maintenance. Despite reduced EGFR activation in 3D-cultured cells, downstream signaling responses differed: PC9 cells exhibited higher levels of p-AKT, p-MAPK, and p-STAT3, while PC9-GR3 cells showed reduced p-MAPK and p-AKT, with no changes in p-STAT3. Regarding G28 treatment, it exhibited cytotoxic effects in both 2D- and 3D-cultured cells, suggesting potential efficacy in targeting both non-LCSCs and LCSCs. Furthermore, the treatment downregulated FASN and AKT, reducing or avoiding the proliferation of this malignant population.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the potential of G28 as a therapeutic option for targeting LCSCs in both sensitive and resistant EGFRm NSCLC cells, though additional studies are required to validate these results and assess their clinical applicability.

The current standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves a concurrent platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy, followed by consolidative therapy with durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, based on the PACIFIC trial (NCT02125461). However, the utility of durvalumab in EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients is questionable based on post-hoc analysis and multi-institutional retrospective analysis. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with proven clinical efficacy in NSCLC. Given that durvalumab showed no benefit in unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC, it is exciting that most recently, the LAURA trial has demonstrated promising outcomes with adjuvant osimertinib in unresectable, stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC after definitive chemoradiotherapy with significant improvement in PFS compared to placebo. Furthermore, the LAURA trial demonstrates that osimertinib has a protective effect against distant metastases and CNS progression in this patient population. Here, we explore the results of the LAURA trial and how it transforms the standard-of-care treatment for patients with unresectable, stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC moving forward.

Introduction: Comprehensive profiling of mutations in the EGFR gene is vital for selecting patients eligible for EGFR targeted therapies.

Methods: We investigated the prevalence of EGFR mutations and treatment patterns in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Vietnam as a part of EARLY-EGFR (Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04742192), a global, real-world study. Consecutive patients with surgically resected stage IA-IIIB, non-squamous NSCLC were diagnosed from August 2021 to June 2022 and were prospectively enrolled from November 2021 to July 2022.

Results: A total 200 patients (age: median [range], 60.0 [30.0-80.0] years) were enrolled from 3 centers; 56.0% were males and 64.0% never smoked. The prevalence of EGFR mutations was 51.0% (102/200) including deletions in exon-19 (49.0%) and exon-21 L858R mutations (33.3%). Females (73.9%, 65/88), patients aged ≥60 years (52.5%, 53/101), nonsmokers (61.2%, 63/103) and those with stage I (55.8%, 67/120) had higher prevalence of EGFR mutations. Multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]) showed EGFR mutations to be significantly associated (p < 0.05) with female gender (aOR = 5.90), age ≥60 years (aOR = 1.05), and stage III disease (vs stage I) (aOR = 0.30).

Conclusion: These results underscore the need for EGFR testing early in management algorithm of NSCLC in Vietnam to identify patients eligible for targeted therapy in concordance with international guidelines.

Purpose: In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), transformation to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is associated with poor outcomes, and the optimal treatment strategy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical factors and treatments associated with outcomes in this group.

Patients and methods: This retrospective multicenter study enrolled patients with SCLC transformed from advanced NSCLC after progression on EGFR-TKI treatment. We analyzed clinical and demographic characteristics, first-line EGFR-TKI treatments, and subsequent regimens to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes.

Results: Twenty-seven patients diagnosed with SCLC transformation after EGFR-TKI therapy between 2018 and 2023 were enrolled, most of whom had an EGFR exon 19 deletion (67%). The subsequent treatment regimens included traditional chemotherapy (CT) in 12 patients (44%), combined CT/EGFR-TKI in 10 patients (37%), and combined CT/immunotherapy in 5 patients (19%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment, subsequent SCLC treatment, and overall survival (OS) were 16.1 months, 6.4 months, and 39.5 months, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median PFS for subsequent treatments were 38.5%, 69.2%, and 6.4 months, respectively. The DCRs for subsequent CT, CT/TKI, and CT/immunotherapy were 41.7%, 88.9%, and 100%, respectively. ORR and PFS were higher in the CT/TKI (44.4% and 7.2 months) and CT/immunotherapy (80.0% and 11.3 months) groups compared to CT (16.7% and 3.7 months), but these differences were not statistically significant. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no significant differences in PFS and OS among treatments.

Conclusion: In patients with SCLC transformed from advanced NSCLC after EGFR-TKI treatment, adding immunotherapy and EGFR-TKI to CT improved DCR and showed trends in ORR and PFS, but did not provide an OS benefit. More prospective studies with varied therapeutic approaches are needed to confirm these findings.

Objective: Extensive stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) is the most lethal lung cancer, and the addition of immunotherapy conferred a slight survival benefit for patients. Extensive molecular profiling of patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (CT+IO) would be able to identify molecular factors associated with patients' survival.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, 99 ES-SCLC patients were considered. Of the 79 includible patients, 42 received CT (median age 71 y/o, I-IIIQ: 65-76), and 37 received CT+IO (median age 71 y/o, I-IIIQ 66-75). The FoundationOne CDx assay was performed on patients' tumor tissues.

Results: The most mutated genes were TP53 (99%), RB1 (78%), PTEN (23%) and MLL2 (20%), with no significant differences between the treatment groups. As a continuous variable, Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) had an effect on patients' progression-free survival (PFS) by type of treatment (HR 1.81 (95%, CI: 0.99-3.31) and HR 0.84 (95%, CI: 0.56-1.26) for patients treated with CT and CT+IO, respectively). TMB was also computed and dichotomized using two different cut-offs: considering cut-offs of 10 mut/Mb and >16 mut/Mb, 45 patients (57%) and 68 patients (86.1%) had a low TMB, respectively. A high TMB (cut-off 10 mut/Mb) predicted worse PFS in patients treated with CT (p=0.046); even though not statistically significant, a high TMB (cut-off 16 mut/Mb) predicted a better survival in patients treated with CT+IO. Moreover, at univariate analysis, MLL2 mutations were associated with better prognosis in the overall case series (HR_PFS = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28-0.94), and overall survival (HR_OS = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28-0.97).

Conclusion: In ES-SCLC, TMB is associated with worse survival in patients treated with CT alone, and with better survival in patients treated with CT+IO, whether considered as a continuous or a dichotomized variable, at different cut-offs. Alterations in epigenetic factors are also associated to better patient prognosis.

Background: BRAF mutations are generally divided into three classes based on the different altered mechanism of activation.

Methods: We queried the public AACR GENIE database (version 13.1), which includes tumor mutation burden (TMB) data, to explore potential molecular differences among the three classes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Results: Out of 20,713 unique NSCLC patients, 324 (1.6%) were BRAF mutations positive (BRAF+) class I, 260 (1.3%) class II, and 236 (1.1%) class III. The distribution of patient characteristics, including sex, age, and race, remains uniform across the three classes. The median TMB (mt/MB) was 6.5, 9.5, and 10.3 for class I, II, and III, respectively. The mean TMB was 61.5 ± 366.1 for class I, 40.5 ± 156.2 for class II, and 129.4 ± 914.8 for class III. About 30.5% of BRAF V600E+ patients had TMB ≥ 10; 47.7% of class II had TMB ≥ 10; and 52.5% of class III had TMB ≥ 10. For those patients with TMB ≥ 10, the median TMB was 45, 28.9, 18.4 for class I, II, and III, respectively. For TMB ≥ 10 patients, TP53 mutation was the most common co-alterations across all 3 classes.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of BRAF+ NSCLC patients exhibited a TMB ≥ 10, among all three classes of BRAF mutation classification, including BRAF V600E+ NSCLC. Class III mutations appeared to have the highest median TMB, followed by class II, and then class I.

Mutations in KRAS G12C are among the more common oncogenic driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In December 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to adagrasib, a small molecule covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C, for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC who received at least one prior systemic therapy based on promising results from phase 1 and 2 trials wherein adagrasib demonstrated a median PFS of 6.5 months. Results from the phase 3 KRYSTAL-12 trial were recently presented, showing benefit with adagrasib compared to docetaxel, with participants in the adagrasib group demonstrating a PFS of 5.5 months compared to 3.8 months in the docetaxel group. However, these results fall short of the 6-month PFS benchmark that had seemed achievable from what had been seen in phase 1 and 2 trials, mirroring similarly disappointing results from the CodeBreaK 200 trial wherein sotorasib, the first-in-class KRAS G12C inhibitor, also failed to meet the 6-month benchmark also thought to be possible when examining earlier trials. These results raise the question of adagrasib's true value in the second-line treatment setting and compel us to explore more potent novel therapies, combination therapies, and more as we seek to break the 6-month PFS barrier in the treatment of KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC.

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) ^G12C-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 10-13% of advanced nonsquamous NSCLC cases in Western populations, presenting a significant therapeutic challenge owing to the difficulty of directly targeting KRAS. Adagrasib, an oral small-molecule covalent inhibitor, irreversibly and selectively targets KRAS^G12C in its inactive state. It received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on December 12, 2022, following the KRYSTAL-1 Phase II trial. The Phase III KRYSTAL-12 trial demonstrated that adagrasib significantly improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with docetaxel (HR, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.76; P<0.0001) and increased the intracranial objective response rate (ORR) to 40% in the central nervous system (CNS) evaluable population. This paper evaluates the clinical efficacy of adagrasib in KRAS ^G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC discussing its potential advantages over other inhibitors such as sotorasib. Despite not reaching the 6-month mPFS benchmark, adagrasib offers significant clinical benefits, particularly for the management of CNS metastases. In this pros and cons debate, we argue that adagrasib has broken the KRAS ^G12C enigma code in NSCLC.