Miki Scaravaglio, Vincenzo Ronca, Marco Carbone, Pietro Invernizzi
<p>Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterised by T-cell–mediated destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, leading to progressive cholestasis and, if untreated, end-stage liver disease with the attendant need for liver transplantation (LT). In addition, symptoms like fatigue and pruritus affect up to 70% of patients, significantly impairing patients' quality of life [<span>1</span>]. The introduction of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) nearly 30 years ago revolutionised PBC management and changed the natural history of the disease by improving cholestasis [<span>2</span>] and transplant-free survival [<span>3</span>]. However, UDCA is ineffective in up to 40% of patients and does generally not alleviate symptoms, highlighting the need for effective second-line therapies [<span>4</span>]. To date, second-line therapies for PBC include the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist obeticholic acid (Ocaliva, OCA) and four peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists: fenofibrate and bezafibrate (off-label) and elafibranor and seladelpar (licensed).</p><p>OCA, approved in 2016, was supported by the POISE trial, where 47% of patients (vs. 10% placebo) achieved the primary endpoint, defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reduction < 1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) and ≥ 15% reduction from baseline, and normal bilirubin at 12 months [<span>5</span>]. Although the COBALT confirmatory trial was terminated due to recruitment issues [<span>6</span>], the POISE long-term safety extension (LTSE) study showed that PBC patients treated with OCA for 6 years had a 2.4% rate of clinical events (LT or death), significantly lower than rates in non-OCA treated real-world external controls from the Global PBC (10.0%) and UK-PBC (13.2%) cohorts [<span>7</span>]. The major safety concerns that emerged in the trial and post-approval studies were worsening of pruritus and the occurrence of severe liver injury in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [<span>5, 8</span>]. In a decision that, while surprising to the community, may have been anticipated by regulators, the EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended the revocation of the marketing authorization for OCA. The recommendation stems from the conclusion that the benefits of OCA no longer outweigh its associated risks. Following a thorough review of the available evidence, the committee determined that the clinical benefits of OCA have not been substantiated [<span>9</span>].</p><p>PPAR agonists exert anticholestatic effects through activating PPARs with different specificities. Among them, the pan-PPAR agonist bezafibrate has been extensively used as off-label treatment in PBC patients with no response or intolerant to UDCA based on the results of the phase 3 BEZURSO and FITCH trials. In the BEZURSO trial [<span>10</span>], 31% of bezafibrate-treated patients (vs. 0% in the placebo group) met the primary endpoint, defined as nor
{"title":"Improving Primary Biliary Cholangitis Outcomes in the Evolving Landscape of Second-Line Therapies","authors":"Miki Scaravaglio, Vincenzo Ronca, Marco Carbone, Pietro Invernizzi","doi":"10.1111/liv.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterised by T-cell–mediated destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, leading to progressive cholestasis and, if untreated, end-stage liver disease with the attendant need for liver transplantation (LT). In addition, symptoms like fatigue and pruritus affect up to 70% of patients, significantly impairing patients' quality of life [<span>1</span>]. The introduction of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) nearly 30 years ago revolutionised PBC management and changed the natural history of the disease by improving cholestasis [<span>2</span>] and transplant-free survival [<span>3</span>]. However, UDCA is ineffective in up to 40% of patients and does generally not alleviate symptoms, highlighting the need for effective second-line therapies [<span>4</span>]. To date, second-line therapies for PBC include the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist obeticholic acid (Ocaliva, OCA) and four peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists: fenofibrate and bezafibrate (off-label) and elafibranor and seladelpar (licensed).</p><p>OCA, approved in 2016, was supported by the POISE trial, where 47% of patients (vs. 10% placebo) achieved the primary endpoint, defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reduction < 1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) and ≥ 15% reduction from baseline, and normal bilirubin at 12 months [<span>5</span>]. Although the COBALT confirmatory trial was terminated due to recruitment issues [<span>6</span>], the POISE long-term safety extension (LTSE) study showed that PBC patients treated with OCA for 6 years had a 2.4% rate of clinical events (LT or death), significantly lower than rates in non-OCA treated real-world external controls from the Global PBC (10.0%) and UK-PBC (13.2%) cohorts [<span>7</span>]. The major safety concerns that emerged in the trial and post-approval studies were worsening of pruritus and the occurrence of severe liver injury in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [<span>5, 8</span>]. In a decision that, while surprising to the community, may have been anticipated by regulators, the EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended the revocation of the marketing authorization for OCA. The recommendation stems from the conclusion that the benefits of OCA no longer outweigh its associated risks. Following a thorough review of the available evidence, the committee determined that the clinical benefits of OCA have not been substantiated [<span>9</span>].</p><p>PPAR agonists exert anticholestatic effects through activating PPARs with different specificities. Among them, the pan-PPAR agonist bezafibrate has been extensively used as off-label treatment in PBC patients with no response or intolerant to UDCA based on the results of the phase 3 BEZURSO and FITCH trials. In the BEZURSO trial [<span>10</span>], 31% of bezafibrate-treated patients (vs. 0% in the placebo group) met the primary endpoint, defined as nor","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/liv.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}